Yesterday St John published their 2021 call out report. Startling rises underline the extent of vaccine injury.
In order to understand these figures refer back to Medsafe adverse effects reports I covered on February 3rd:
St John ambulance cases increased by 6.8% in 2021 to 555,000.
Out of the St. John categories of call outs, I have selected those conditions which correspond to common adverse effects of vaccination reported to Medsafe.
Note: to be complete I have also noted figures for suicide (up 30%) which are believed to be related to the effect of lockdowns.
The vaccine adverse effect categories increased by 17,000 cases.
The large rises in chest pain (up 6,102—+15.5%) and breathing problems (up 5,195—+14.4%) correspond to increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis.
It is to be noted that the St John figures are for those sufficiently ill to warrant the call of an ambulance. Generally ambulance cases involve people who are seriously ill and in need of urgent attention.
St John Figures Show Many Vaccine Injuries Are Serious
Of the 46,000 adverse effect cases reported to Medsafe following Covid vaccination, 8,500 were for chest pain and 5,000 for breathing difficulties.
Medsafe estimates that only 5% of adverse effects are recorded in its system.
The St John figures indicate that contrary to Medsafe’s assertion that these conditions were non-serious, a great many were serious enough to warrant an ambulance call out.
It is interesting that despite anecdotal reports from ambulance crews of high vaccine injury case loads, St John has no category for vaccine injury per see.
Instead St John joins the long list of official bodies in vaccine injury denial saying only that “St John attributes rises in chest pain and breathing difficulties to the direct impact of COVID-19 or COVID-19 lockdowns.” A rather inadequate assertion given the low Covid incidence in 2021.
For weeks now, I and others have been writing about the unprecedented level of vaccine injury supported by science journal publishing.
There has been an overwhelming level of support and more case records coming in daily through social media and the rapidly growing alternative press in New Zealand including the Daily Telegraph, The Buzz, The Daily Examiner, The Health Forum NZ, VFF, Gary Moller, Muriel Newman, and many others (too many to mention everyone, apologies).
Thank you for everyone’s support and continued efforts to stand up and speak up. So why the inexplicable silence from the government and mainstream media?
We are talking here of the lives of many tens of thousands of people in New Zealand adversely affected by vaccination, thousands very seriously. These are all people who followed government advice and accepted assurances of safety.
Adverse effects are running at an unprecedented 30 times more than previous vaccinations. We know that the standard response of silence in the face of statistics and personal stories has been curated directly by Jacinda Ardern who famously deleted 30,000 adverse effect comments on her FB page.
How does this work?
We don’t have to look very far into history.
Is Ardern Following in Tony Blair’s Footsteps?
Take the case of Tony Blair, like Ardern he is skilled in public relations—a mesmerising public speaker.
In his heyday, an overwhelmingly popular politician who articulated a vision that communicated a sense of hope and promise to the population. His appeal stretched across historical political boundaries.
At some point, he decided to use his abilities to promote a lie—fully aware of the UK spy agency report that they had none, he told the public that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
His lie provided justification for a war in which a million Iraqis died.
Tony Blair used his skills to impart to his global public a sense that the war was the right thing to do.
There were two elements to this—the invention of an imminent threat from fictious weapons to create fear in the population and demonisation of a foreign population of Iraqis in order that mass murder could be seen as a righteous act.
Has Ardern used the same tactics?
Quite early on in 2021, it should have been clear to the government from reports out of Israel that vaccination gave rise to heart disease.
As the vaccine rollout progressed in New Zealand, adverse effects piled up.
But saturation advertising promising that the vaccine was safe and effective continued.
Ardern used her PR skills to not only deflect questions, but demonise the vaccine hesitant as ill-informed, weak-minded people.
As the year went on, serious scientific work emerged documenting risks of vaccination—there were many.
These were not only ignored, but suppressed through the Ardern doctrine that the government should be the only source of information.
The Deception is Continuing with Omicron Misinformation
As the year ended, scientific studies of Omicron reached a number of important conclusions: Omicron is a mild illness that equally affects vaccinated and unvaccinated.
A study in Israel found even a fourth Covid booster is not enough to fight Omicron.
It is notable that health authorities in both the EU and Israel have tried to suppress information that Omicron is a mild illness unaffected by vaccination.
Similarly here in New Zealand, saturation advertising encouraging boosters has continued, painting a picture of severe risk from Omicron and the fiction that the booster shot provides protection.
No mention of the progressively increased risk of myocarditis with each vaccine dose.
Ardern has used her star power to promote a vaccination dream and she has succeeded in imparting a sense of righteous vaccination achievement to a large cohort of the population.
This has left the vaccine injured shut out of coverage, and the rest of the population unaware that they have been exposed through vaccination to a long-term unquantified risk of heart illness.
As with any exaggeration or lie, at some point there has to be an accounting. Almost everyone in New Zealand knows of a friend or family member adversely affected by vaccination.
Gradually the penny is dropping that these are not isolated unfortunate incidents but part of a pattern that the government has sought to sweep under the carpet.
Ardern, Hipkins, and Bloomfield are the central characters promoting vaccination at the expense of any reality check.
We suspect that they are finding it hard to admit the deception, but now they have to take responsibility.
Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)
