In the short space of three years, New Zealand society has been transformed. Our economic circumstances, our health landscape, our political ideas, our attitude to the rest of the world, and crucially, our social cohesion have undergone a sea change. This change has not been a positive step of progress. How was this allowed to happen? Was this imposed on us, or did we do it to ourselves?

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

Well, you will no doubt give me a one word answer—Covid. But what does that mean? You have to go back at least to 2017 to begin to understand what happened. At that point in time, medical authorities and the general public began to be subject to carefully placed publicity announcing that novel mRNA technology was on the verge of curing all disease.

Biotechnology was compared to the operation of one of the most common and useful modern tools of our everyday lives—computers. Tal Zak, CEO of Moderna explained in a TED Talk:

“We think of DNA like an operating system….we are hacking the software of life, the genetic code, and that has profound implications for the cure of everything from flu to cancer….We think of biotechnology as information therapy.”

Heady stuff, but this was in fact an attempt by biotechnologists to shake off some very dark truths. An article in Gene Therapy in January 2003 entitled “Adverse effects of gene therapy: Gene therapy can cause leukaemia: no shock, mild horror but a probe” reported:

“There is a risk of treatment-induced malignancy from retrovirally based gene therapies.…its spectre has always loomed over the field.”

An article in Frontiers in Oncology in April 2019, just before the pandemic, entitled “Gene Therapy Leaves a Vicious Cycle” summarised a history of catastrophes:

“…gene therapy has been caught in a vicious cycle for nearly two decades owing to immune response, insertional mutagenesis, viral tropism, off-target activity, unwanted clinical outcomes (ranging from illness to death of participants in clinical trials), and patchy regulations.”

The authors of this study wanted to encourage us all to think that these problems had almost been solved. There was one small fly in the ointment—they hadn’t yet, nor were they likely to be in the future. Such statements were designed to keep investments and grant money flowing. They were based on vain hopes not facts (to find out more about inherent problems with biotechnology read “Twenty Reasons Biotechnology Experimentation Should Be Outlawed”).

Trouble was brewing as governments rushed to introduce mRNA vaccines after ridiculously short trials whose concerning initial outcomes were being kept well hidden, including a wide range of adverse effects and some unexplained deaths. An article in Nature Medicine entitled “Gene Therapy Needs a Long-Term Approach” published on April 15 2021, as the vaccine roll out began around the world, summed up serious warnings being voiced behind the scenes:

“Gene-therapy trials are on the rise, but more needs to be done to understand the long-term risks associated with this type of treatment…..[there are] growing concerns about the late adverse effects.”

As we have repeatedly covered in our reports, published scientific research has picked apart the mRNA safe and effective narrative. We now know from official government data, carefully designed research protocols and in many cases personal experience that these adverse effects include the disruption of most of our major physiological systems: cardiovascular, immunologic, neurological, pulmonary, gastrointestinal-excretory, dermatologic, haematologic and reproductive.

Each of these systems relies on the genetic structures contained in our cells, the very same cells that were being repurposed by mRNA injections to perform jobs distinctly different from the trillions of tasks that they normally undertook. The tasks that keep us alive and well. We were being hacked, as Tal Zak suggested, but not by information therapy, rather by disinformation therapy. Studies show our cells were being reprogrammed to produce toxic spike proteins in quantity over a long period of time, whilst their usual immune functions were suppressed. The stage was set for a catastrophe.

If you want a graphic illustration of what the breakdown of even one of these physiological systems looks like, review this scientific paper entitled “Autoimmune skin disorders and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination – a meta-analysis” published in the Journal of the German Society of Dermatologists. The pictures it contains are not for the squeamish. The paper examines the results of 187 publications recording cases of skin conditions which developed subsequent to Covid vaccination. These are cases of the body attacking itself and fall into just one category of adverse effects among many.

Why didn’t we know this could happen? Why didn’t anyone in authority warn us.?

It is a common refrain among uninformed observers that the government, the medical establishment and the media would never get safety so wrong, but they did and the reasons are not so very far from something spelt M O N E Y. Having decided to close our borders and only open them when the whole population had been vaccinated, the government began paying key players to get on board and ostracising those you didn’t.

This carrot and stick approach worked very well. Reportedly doctors were paid $75 each vaccine dose administered, but could lose their practising certificate if they publicly asked questions. A similar coercive approach was floated among a range of professions. Other organisations received even larger per head payments to ferry people into vaccination centres. Schools were given a free hand to ‘encourage’ participation of pupils irrespective of the wishes of parents. This included exclusion from normal activities. The media received cash grants and direct payments to air specific content. Businesses were recompensed for lost income. Fear was also a great motivator. It became very easy to accept the cash and keep quiet.

Just how much money was involved?

It wasn’t small. Reportedly, medical practices were paid $135 for each nasal swab they performed. Naturally the focus of some doctors stepped up a gear. A well organised effort to contact patients enabled some practices to swab 200 patients a day bringing in $27,000 for a day’s work, more than the yearly pension of a retired couple. It is very hard to turn this kind of money down and honestly admit that the vaccines were not only not working, but patient health was suffering. In all, we estimate that the government paid a total of more than $2 billion for administering these pandemic medical services in the community (excluding those provided by hospitals).

By mid 2022 the government had also paid over $19 billion in wage subsidies, much of it to companies who continued to turn in healthy profits for the period. There was little sympathy for employees sacked for remaining unvaccinated, who stood to lose their profession and in many cases the roof over their heads—the family home.

These figures dwarf the $1 billion used to purchase vaccines. Therefore the vast majority of money spent by the government during the pandemic did not go overseas, it was used to pay people to support government policies without thinking about the consequences.

Now we know beyond any reasonable doubt that mRNA vaccines come with high levels of adverse effects and long term health issues, what is the government doing to recompense those adversely affected? Incredibly, the government wants to blame those most affected. Watch Chris Hipkins say with a straight face that people affected by vaccine mandates “ultimately made their own choices”. The level of gas lighting is shocking. Aside from NZ First and minor parties started in response to pandemic mismanagement, this opinion seemed to be shared by all the major parties. No one is prepared to shoulder any blame whatsoever or make up for past mistakes.

Our elected politicians have failed to acknowledge adverse effects, failed to call for the compensation of affected people through ACC, and now wish to blame the sufferers themselves. Their answer: You did it to yourselves, go away. Not a single one among our current crop of 120 elected politicians accepts any responsibility for pandemic missteps. Don’t make the mistake of voting them back this October. There is little point in voting anyone in, unless, as a minimum, they plan to immediately entrench the Bill of Rights as an inviolable constitutional principle.

Last week we reported two recently published scientific studies. One of these found that COVID-19 vaccination increases susceptibility to bacterial and viral infection among the young—it weakens immune responses. The other found that COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocardial injury is far more common than previously thought—affecting one person in 35—1000 times higher than the rate admitted by our government. Today we highlight two more studies.

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

A study available at PubMed entitled “Detection of recombinant Spike protein in the blood of individuals vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2: Possible molecular mechanisms” employed mass spectrometry to detect the presence of a version of the Covid spike protein known as a PP type that specifically results only from mRNA vaccination. The authors report that

“The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological samples analysed, and its presence was independent of the SARS CoV-2 IgG antibody titre. The minimum and maximum time at which PP-Spike was detected after vaccination was 69 and 187 days, respectively.”

In the study conducted in Southern Italy, 20 subjects were mRNA vaccinated, 20 were unvaccinated (this group of subjects did not have Covid or Covid antibodies), another 20 subjects were unvaccinated but tested positive for Covid. Only the vaccinated group tested positive for the vaccine induced PP-spike protein.

Early claims were widely publicised that spike protein would only be produced for a few days after vaccination, supposedly sufficient to stimulate an immune response, and then would cease. However, no study supported these claims. The new study proves these claims false. Over half of the vaccinated subjects had the PP-spike protein for up to the 6 month duration of the study. The authors theorised that:

“It is possible that the mRNA sequences from the vaccine may be integrated or re-transcribed in some cells”.

Given the suspected association between myocardial damage and the spike protein, this points to the continuous production of a cardiac toxin by some genetically transformed cells in a high proportion of vaccinated individuals. As the study terminated after six months, it is quite possible, if not probable, that the effect may continue past six months.

This is not isolated speculation, last year we commented on a study entitled Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line, which found that reverse transcription of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine occurs in vitro (outside the human body). We now have good reason to suspect it also occurs inside our physiology.

A die-hard vaccine advocate might try to defend Covid vaccination, arguing that it increases some risks but on the plus side reduces the rate and risks of Covid infections. Yet a year ago a study was published in the journal of Clinical Infectious Diseases entitled Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Naturally Acquired Immunity versus Vaccine-induced Immunity, Reinfections versus Breakthrough Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study which found that the opposite is the case. The authors reported that vaccinated individuals have a 13-fold increased risk of a breakthrough Covid infection when compared to unvaccinated individuals who have acquired natural immunity through prior infection. Moreover, the vaccinated group had a 7-fold increased risk of symptomatic Covid infection involving hospitalisation when compared to the unvaccinated.

This doesn’t seem to have prevented health authorities from rushing to hand out more Covid jabs the minute new variants are reported, without stopping to investigate. The newly detected Pirola (BA.2.86), a variant of Omicron, is a case in point. The UK government is speeding up Covid vaccination programmes and widening availability before anything reliable is known about its severity or transmissibility.

In a message for the public, UK Health Security Agency chief executive Dame Jenny Harries falsely asserted:

“Thanks to the success [???] of our vaccine programme, we have built strong, broad immune defences against new variants throughout the population.”

And followed up with the non-sequitur—you need to get yet another shot—saying “In the meantime, please come forward for the vaccine when you are called.”

Dr. Trisha Greenhalgh, a so-called internationally renowned expert and UK government adviser based at the formerly prestigious University of Oxford urged the government: “It might be a good idea to vaccinate everyone”

It makes me wonder if our health tsars are thinking before speaking, or are they stuck on auto-pilot? This all reminds me of people standing on street corners with signs saying “the end is nigh” or rather “the golden age is just around the next corner if only you will take one more dose of my marvellous medicines”. It doesn’t make any sense when you compare these statements to health data and published science.

There are occasional flashes of realism creeping in. Dyed in the wool vaccine supporter Stuff newspaper admitted last week, “We lack quality evidence about how effective different interventions are.” In other words, we have been feeding you a lot of balderdash. You can say that again.

Two weeks ago, we reported official NZ government figures recording that the number of people unable to work because of disability had increased by 37.5% since 2020. Recently it was reported that the number of people of working age with a disability in the USA rose by 857,000 in June. The media comment on such alarming figures is often tied up with vague talk of Long Covid, which only serves to confuse the issue and pump the fear factor. The effect of mRNA vaccination is simply not mentioned. The four studies we have cited in this and our previous release reveal a completely different story.

The authors of these papers went to great lengths to separate the effect of Covid infection from the effect of mRNA Covid vaccination. In each case, the effect Covid vaccination alone was to blame for adverse effects or poor immune responses. It is notable that other data we have previously reported indicates that each subsequent Covid vaccination dose further increases the risks of adverse effects.

There is a lesson here. I am reporting the above studies with a blanket recommendation, don’t take any more doses of mRNA Covid vaccines. The risks are verified to be substantial and serious. But let’s ask a more probing question: Why are mRNA vaccines so dangerous?

mRNA vaccines are designed to breach the cell membrane which protects the genetic intelligence of the body.

An analogy might make the significance of this process clear. Imagine a castle which houses the wise ruler of a territory. Safe in his castle, the ruler exercises his power and is able to manage the whole territory. An enemy army approaches. Using cannons, they breach the castle walls and create havoc, deposing the ruler and his administration. The system of wise rule breaks down, and everyone in the territory is now at risk. The invaders thought they would take over the territory and benefit from its riches. Instead, chaos rules.

The genetic intelligence operating inside our cells is completely different from the linear intelligence used to design mRNA vaccines. Linear or limited human intelligence makes one decision at a time that unfolds a chain of events. Genetic intelligence makes multiple decisions simultaneously and manages multiple interlocking functions in the trillions of cells in the human body, like the ruler in the castle who manages the whole territory. The mRNA vaccine is the invading army, it is not designed to protect the myriad functions of genetic intelligence, in fact, it undermines them.

The studies we have looked at in this, and our last release illustrate how immune function is compromised by mRNA vaccines. They illustrate the dangers which surface when multi-purpose genetic intelligence is replaced by a single focus on one particular type of activity to the exclusion of general immunity. Finally, they show how natural immunity is better placed to handle viral threats.

This points to a general principle—natural laws take multiple decisions simultaneously at all places, man-made laws are limited to specific circumstances and places. Uncountable trillions of physiological functions are automatically and precisely taken care of by our cells functioning under genetic intelligence every hour of the day. Replacing this kind of intelligence with crude fragments of genetic material invented in a lab is dangerous in the extreme, it is potentially terminal.

Just look around at the state of the world after the pandemic. We have emerged damaged. Resetting our medical, administrative, justice and economic systems is proving hard indeed. Chaos is threatening to rule.

There are time-honoured systems of protecting immunity. The traditional systems of Indian Ayurveda, Chinese medicine, and Western herbal lore utilise the genetic intelligence of plants to enhance immune function. Spiritual well being supported by prayer is revered. Systems of meditation known to multiple cultures provide very deep rest aiding recovery. Exercise, dietary, and breathing regimes are also proven to aid recovery. Fresh air, sunshine and family time are necessary. These provide major benefits. Studies confirm considerable improvements in health across a range of multiple conditions. I discuss and reference these in my book Your DNA Diet.

As we move into the election, we have to ask what are the health perspectives of the candidates and potential new political leaders? As the pandemic unfolded, government health policy, media comment and medical advice became highly integrated, but it was integrated around a false paradigm of health that was heavily promoted by pharmaceutical interests focused on profit. New science findings have revealed some very hard truths about safety. The establishment has found these very difficult to face. Before voting, we need to know who among our future politicians are capable of assimilating the new perspective on health and protecting us from falling victim to ever more invasive genetic experimentation.

We have entered the election silly season where politicians of all parties are promising us the earth. All the more important that we keep our feet on the ground and stick to the facts.

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

It takes time to design, fund, execute, and publish good studies, but a succession of very concerning results have recently been published in scientific journals. Will this change the drift of Covid politics and media reporting? It should, but instead, we are being treated to yet more scare stories and vaccine talk. So what are facts?

A Swiss study published July 4th, 2023, in the European Journal of Heart Failure entitled “Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination” has found that myocardial injury is far more common than previously thought. The authors realised that passive reporting of myocarditis following vaccination would only capture severe cases, missing milder cases which also affect future cardiac health outcomes.

In their prospective study of 777 healthcare workers following Moderna Covid mRNA booster vaccination, the authors tested for acute dynamic increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration above the gender-specific normal upper limit on day 3 after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause. 40 participants were found to have such elevated troponin levels, and 22 of these were adjudicated to have vaccine-associated myocardial injury. That is a whopping rate of one person out of 35 recipients. Women were more likely to be affected than men. As a measure of scale, 1 in 35 is a thousand times higher than the myocarditis rate currently admitted by our government.

A study published in Frontiers in Immunology 25th August 2023 entitled “BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination in children alters cytokine responses to heterologous pathogens and Toll-like receptor agonists” offers even more concerning information. Children aged 5-11 vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine had a reduced immune response to viral and bacterial pathogens when tested 28 days after their second shot. In other words, they suffered Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency (VAIDS). In short, they had become more vulnerable to a range of diseases as a result of vaccination. For a detailed discussion of the implications read here.

I can’t help thinking of the judges who ordered the vaccination of children against the wishes of one or other parents. I can’t help thinking of the elevated rates of heart disease in New Zealand. The unprecedented high rates of vaccine injury and excess deaths. The studies cited above provide further understanding of how this is happening.

These are not unexpected findings. Eminent scientists have warned about these outcomes from early in the vaccine rollout.

These early warnings fell on deaf ears, they should do so no longer. The medical tsars, media explainers, and political leaders need to take note, yet they are still stuck firmly in a groove.

Rather than building on facts presented in carefully designed and executed studies like these, politicians in election mode are finely tuned to speaking whatever they think may get them more votes. With a population heavily conditioned by government advertising to fear a plague of Covid, the common political strategy is to play on the fear and promise to make it all go away with, you guessed it, more vaccines. Watch Joe Biden on the campaign trail at Lake Tahoe over the weekend say:

“I signed off this morning on a proposal we have to present to Congress a request for additional funding for a new vaccine that is necessary, that works.”

“And tentatively, not decided, finally but tentatively, it is recommended that – it would likely be recommended that everybody get it,” the president continued. “Whether they got it before or not.”

You don’t need me to tell you that ‘recommended for everyone whether vaccinated before or not’ is political-speak for renewed vaccine mandates. If you compare Biden’s ideas with the above studies, you realise that the political and financial clout of pharmaceutical companies is big enough to drown any facts out of the conversation—even if it might send us to hospital.

The plain idiocy of this view should by now be obvious, but this seems to have escaped a great many people. Watch former democratic representative Harold Ford’s reaction to the Biden agenda. He plans to get his seventh shot and admits to having had Covid three times already. What goes through someone’s mind getting a seventh when the previous six definitely haven’t worked? You tell me.

I’m speechless, or rather frozen in front of my keyboard. What more can you possibly say to warn about the dangers of mRNA Covid vaccines? Especially when no one in authority is likely to be listening. They don’t work, they harm 1 in 35 within 3 days, and they trigger immune deficiency, which could lower resistance to a range of diseases. Cancers, heart disease, strokes, and kidney disease are on the rise but keep on taking the COVID-19 vaccines, the government tells us. The unwritten sub text:—we will continue to spend big on Covid vaccines, thereby supporting the American economy, helping to increase our national debt, and destroying our national health service.

So what makes our politicians, media pundits, and medical authorities so wilfully blind to our welfare? There appear to be a number of reasons, not the least of which are money and power. Covid has become our leading bureaucratic industry. It has multiplied opportunities to wield political and professional power and benefit from lucrative contracts.

The state expects to control our lives. A month ago, the SIS reported to parliament that foreign powers were conducting interference in New Zealand. They included the usual suspects like China and Iran but also went further to warn that New Zealanders had begun to talk about concepts foreign to our national identity, like the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

The US First Amendment prevents the government from making laws that

‘regulate an establishment of religion, or that prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.’

I am sure you will agree that these are not concepts that are foreign to New Zealand. We have almost identical principles in our Bill of Rights. Principles that the government and the courts set aside during the pandemic.

These are not abstract principles, they are fundamental to a healthy relationship between the people and the state. The plans of Western governments, including ours, appear to be going in an opposite direction—more state control over fundamental rights and freedom of speech. To find out more about this, watch here.

Ever escalating control of the means of communication and information content is an unsustainable strategy. As Abraham Lincoln said:

“You can fool some of the people all of the time and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”

Inevitably, the truth will rise to the surface, just as it is through the process of Covid science investigation and publishing. Continuing to ignore the accumulating evidence of harm amounts to political folly of the worst kind. The verdict of history will no doubt be very harsh, but the harm to individual and public health is already devastating.

Follow me and join the conversation on Twitter and/or Facebook

Another among hundreds of novel biotech vaccines currently under development for a range of diseases has gained approval from the US FDA. 

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

Abrysvo is Pfizer’s vaccine for the prevention of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) in infants through active immunisation of pregnant women at 32-36 weeks of gestational age.

Approval was granted despite the results of the clinical trial of 7126 participants, which found the rate of preterm births among the experimental group was 17% higher than the placebo group. Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in children under 5 years. RSV is a common respiratory illness that usually causes mild cold-like symptoms.

This appears to be an indication that drug safety standards have been significantly relaxed in the wake of the pandemic. High rates of adverse effects no longer appear to be a barrier to approval.

Here in New Zealand, there is a pervading sense of unreality as we drag ourselves towards an election where almost none of the candidates are prepared to discuss our unprecedented rate of excess death except to deny it is happening.

Last night I thought “a society that normalises death has lost its way” and then I started to laugh because of course death is entirely normal, in the end everyone will experience it. Perhaps a better way to express this disturbing thought is to realise that our society seems to have lost its capacity to value life.

It is profoundly worrying to reflect on the state of society.

Our medical system is overwhelmed and in any case seems determined to support pharmaceutical interventions that not only don’t work but also harm the recipients. Our economic circumstances appear unfair and unbalanced and set to become more challenging.

It is hard not to feel that everything that we had previously trusted, or in some cases tolerated, has failed us. We certainly felt we had a place in society that for many people no longer exists. There have been moments of family tragedy and some alienation too. Loss of employment and career prospects. The advice of some cultural or religious mentors has suddenly appeared inappropriate or even damaging to followers. The courts have rejected our right of medical choice, ignoring the provisions of the Bill of Rights.

Politicians are untrustworthy and more to the point uninterested or worse aggressive.

Unbelievably, everyone in authority seems all set to do it all again. National and ACT are pledged to deregulate biotechnology experimentation, apparently completely unmoved by the rapidly growing evidence of an accident at the biotech lab in Wuhan.

If you want to know just how disturbingly tied up with political and military madness this policy is, watch Tucker Carlson interview Robert F. Kennedy Jnr here or Russell Brand summarise the evidence here. If you want to review what is inherently unsafe about biotechnology, read my short summary, “Twenty Reasons Biotechnology Experimentation Should Be Outlawed“

The sheer bloody-minded commitment to a biotech future whatever the human cost speaks of lack of intelligence, complete disregard of the risk to life, venal greed, confused imagination and a deranged desire to play God.

Our first and continuing reaction has been to try to put it all right, to restore a sense of normality. We have rushed about talking to anyone who will listen and even some who refuse to listen. We have talked rationally, referenced science, history, and human rights all to a largely unresponsive and often hostile audience. So what do we do now?

The inevitable reaction is to question whether something has gone fundamentally wrong with the foundational principles of our society.

Earlier this year, we had a big storm up here in Northland. Two panels were completely blown out of our greenhouse. Recently I found time to mend it. In order to slot the panels back into place, I had to disassemble dozens of bolts holding the affected corner together, until I got down to the foundation. There I found the cause of the problem. One bolt was missing. It was never assembled properly, which meant the whole structure was able to flex in the wind enough to release the panels. If the foundation isn’t right, the structure can’t stand.

So what is the foundation of society?

It’s a big question that has no doubt already occurred to you and occupied your thoughts, as it has mine. Which and where are the foundational principles that we can rely on in troubled times?

Whilst democracy appears to have failed us and technology has sometimes isolated and disempowered us, the sun still rises every day. Can we rely on nature to see us through? Perhaps like me, you find it alarming that the focus of political rhetoric has shifted to changing nature through biotechnology.

Certainly, we must retain our faculty of discrimination between right and wrong, truth and falsehood. In the confused blur of the information age we also need to identify what is primary and what is secondary, to distinguish cause from effect. The integrity of our genetic identity is certainly primary to health. National and ACT’s plan to relax the safety rules governing biotech experimentation are reckless and out of touch with the pandemic lessons we should be learning from. Pretending to the public that all is well is an indication of what we could suffer during the next political term.

Imposing risk to human life, or even ignoring it, is a kind of madness. This suggests that collective consciousness could have been adversely affected by the pandemic. Civilisation depends on the quality of consciousness of its members. Stability, adaptability, creativity, intelligence, respect, fairness, empathy and countless other rational qualities have built civilization, debase these and we can hardly imagine where we will end up.

Justice is a function of society that should never be bypassed. There are countless cases of miscarriage of justice throughout history that bring shame on all those involved. For example, Edward Ates, a fifty year old black man was released in 2018 after spending 20 years in a Texas jail for a murder he did not commit. Five years later, he is still classified as out on parole despite DNA evidence that proves he did not commit the crime. Ates was convicted partly through the false testimony of a felon who was promised a reduced sentence.

The authorities in Texas have no desire to exonerate Ates because he would be eligible for compensation, so he still languishes with the stigma of parole status, despite being completely innocent. The Innocence Project believes they know who the actual perpetrator was. The Texas authorities are abusing their power by failing to pursue justice for Ates and failing to go after the real perpetrator. They are determined to stick to their big lie despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, including DNA. The Ates case is the subject of episode three of Web of Death, entitled Crowdsourced Justice which is currently streaming on Disney.

The parallels to pandemic justice have probably not escaped you. Three years ago the unvaccinated were wrongly accused of a crime and punished. Despite growing evidence that mRNA vaccination is neither effective nor safe, the unvaccinated still carry a stigma. Mistakes have not been acknowledged. The real victims of the crime are the vaccinated who have been subjected not just to Covid infection which is almost certainly the result of an escaped genetically modified virus, but they have also received multiple shots designed to teach their nervous system to produce toxic levels of its spike protein. The perpetrators have never been subject to public scrutiny, instead, they have been richly rewarded.

Doubling down on unregulated biotechnology experimentation, as National and ACT are proposing, will simply create opportunities to repeat offences. The parallels to Ates’ case stop here. Ates was one man wrongly convicted of a horrific murder. The pandemic has created billions of victims, millions of wrongly convicted individuals, and tens of thousands of very rich perpetrators. Genetic modification is inherently unsafe, spreads without limit, and can never be recalled.

New Zealand official birth and death figures for 12 months to the end of June 2023 released.

UPDATED: 17 August 2023 8:15 am.

Stats New Zealand released the official figures for births and deaths for the period 1st July 2022 to 30th June 2023 today. The short summary accompanying the release of the horrifying figures compares these to the previous 12 months and reports increases in deaths and reductions in live births. 2022/23 figures would have best been compared to the July 2018 to June 2019 totals, the first available pre-pandemic period. We report this comparison below.

There were 38,442 deaths among all ages for July 2022-June 2023 compared to 33,753 deaths in the 2018/19 comparable period. This is an increase of 4,689 deaths (up 14%) which occurred at a rate of 90 excess deaths per week.

Working age people were also affected. Deaths among 15 to 64 year olds were up by 6%. Figures released by the Household Labour Force Survey reports rates of disability sufficient to preclude joining the workforce among this age group has increased by 37.5% over the same period and now stands at 14.3% of the workforce. That is huge. Why?

Alarmingly, natural live birth increase (births minus deaths) fell from 26,500 in 2018/19 to 19,185 in 2022/23 a decrease of 7,400 or 28%. This is an absolutely unprecedented drop. Nothing even remotely like this has been recorded previously.

Covid deaths over this whole period reported by Our World in Data appear insufficient to explain the increase in deaths. Nor is an ageing population sufficient explanation for the figures that is a long term gradual trend, this is a sudden rise.

We have been aware of data like this for some time now, but there has been deafening silence from our politicians who are currently running for re-election. We are heading into this election under unusual and coercive constraints that have no precedent in our history as a nation.

Due to the events of the last three years, the machinery of government has assumed more control over our medical and food choices. The concerning birth and death figures must be regarded as a verdict on policies which have enjoyed cross party support.

As a result of government policies, we have lost many of our rights as NZ citizens. None of the parties currently elected to Parliament have any plans to revoke this government overreach. So what has gone wrong and how will this affect us if we re-elect the same group of political parties to power?

Pandemic policies have established a precedent allowing the government to enforce compliance with its medical rules. They coerced almost everyone to take specific injections with high rates of adverse effects. Restrictions on social movement and communication have been normalised. Agreements with social media providers and the mainstream press have censored the availability of independent information and hampered scientific dialogue. Access to official public health data has been limited.

The government has also passed the Therapeutic Products Bill which has legitimised the substitution of thousands of natural ingredients with untested synthetic alternatives without requirements for clear labelling. The Bill also facilitates dose restrictions and banning of many traditional herbal products and supplements at the whim of a government bureaucrat.

The government has authorised the addition of chemical fluorides to public water supplies. It has mandated the addition of chemical supplements to staple foods including a synthetic form of folic acid to flour which is hard to metabolise and inhibits some metabolic pathways vital for health.

Re-electing sitting members of parliament from any party is a prescription for more of the same. Our current politicians are refusing to face up to some hard facts. We are in the midst of a medical emergency of unprecedented proportions. Our hospitals are overwhelmed, our politicians are silent.

Unbelievably, our politicians and medical tsars continue to ignore accumulating evidence being published in learned science journals pointing to adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. Despite this, the government is still funding advertising encouraging the population to receive further booster injections. They don’t work and they endanger health.

There are no plans to investigate what has gone wrong. It is time to say goodbye to 120 MPs from across the political spectrum who have spectacularly failed our nation in its hour of need. If they are re-elected our ability to manage our own health choices will be gone for good.

The judgement on their competence is there in black and white from their own statistics—deaths are up 14%, net live birth increase down 28%, disability up 37.5%. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know where this is going. Mistakes were made, and now they cannot be hidden or denied any longer. Some hard questions must be asked and answered.

Our media is compliant and lazy in a coverup. They have enjoyed government support.

None of this is in the character of our nation or in its history. It is time to wake up.

The UK Daily Mail leads today with a story about the heart attack suffered by Bronny James on the basketball court. According to two UK doctors described as leading experts and cited by the Mail, the suggestion that this might be the result of a vaccine injury is a conspiracy theory.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

The article concedes that deaths from heart disease are at record levels and also concedes that Covid vaccines cause heart damage, but stiffly maintains that those conflating these two facts are not only in error but are also engaged in a conspiracy to pervert truth and presumably justice. The BBC also chimes in with an article claiming piously, “there is no evidence to support the implication vaccines might be involved”.

At the ‘heart’ of these claims is the suggestion that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare, so rare that it could not possibly be causing the huge rate of excess deaths from heart disease which amounts, according to the British Heart Foundation, to a massive 30,000 extra UK deaths per year when compared to pre-pandemic levels.

At the same time as Bronny James was suffering a tragic heart attack and its aftermath, Swiss scientists finalised a scientific paper for publication entitled “Sex specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination”. This is a landmark study because it is a gold standard, carefully-planned, prospective study with a rigorous schedule of tests rather than an incomplete retrospective assessment of past events.

777 health care workers were tested for myocardial damage three days after booster vaccination and compared to the same number of controls. 40 of them (1 in 20) had elevated troponin levels indicative of damage to cardiac cells. These people (65% of them women) were subject to follow up tests and 22 of them (1 in 35) were judged to have vaccine-induced myocardial injury. This careful study proves that myocardial injury has been massively underreported. The Mail reports that the UK Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had previously estimated a rate of just 1 in 666. Now known to be wrong by a factor of 20.

By no stretch of the imagination can myocardial injury be judged to be ‘extremely rare’ as the Mail suggests. Nor, according to this detailed discussion by Dr. John Campbell is this level of risk something any of us would consider taking on unless we faced imminent death as an alternative, which we don’t. For another discussion see this informative substack article.

Fortunately, the short term effects among those tested in the Swiss study did not include severe outcomes, but another prospective study completed in 2022 in Thailand on 314 high school students did find such severe effects. It is well known that myocarditis has both short term and long term outcomes. The elevated rate of excess deaths from heart disease in the general population does point to the need to ask questions. Asking them publicly does not amount to a conspiracy. The dismissal of these claims suggests there is an attempt to cover up on the part of the same doctors who coerced us to take the jabs and told us they were effective and safe (they aren’t).

Other causal factors for the steep rise in excess deaths from heart disease suggested by the Mail include the rise in ambulance response times to cardiac incidents from 30 to 90 minutes. It is surely not too hard for the newspaper to realise that if there are more cardiac events there will be longer response times, not the other way around. Another suggestion widely touted until recently was a supposed failure to prescribe statins during the pandemic, this disappeared from newsprint pages when it was realised that statin prescriptions have actually not decreased.

If you want to know just how convoluted denial of responsibility can become, read a translation of an article from Sweden where a 30 year old man died after receiving a booster jab. The government paid his family financial compensation but listed the event as the result of a medicine given in error rather than suffer the embarrassment of calling it a vaccine related death. A paper analysing autopsy results following Covid vaccination underlines the intended obfuscation of this kind of doublespeak.

Behind this posturing and denial of responsibility lies something much darker with more chilling implications for public health. It is not just heart attacks that are up to levels never seen before. Ditto for cancers, kidney injury, neurological injury, strokes, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, stillbirths, cognitive decline and crucially unexplained deaths.

These statistics point to the need for probing questions of a different type. Are the vaccines or indeed Covid infection, which the balance of evidence now suggests both came from a biotech lab, causing generalised immune instability and more worryingly, how long is this going to go on, and how bad will it get?

Sometimes you find that you have to face up to extreme challenges in your personal life. Our responses to these crises define who we are and what we can become. This can require admitting to ourselves and others that we got it all wrong. Apology and humility build character and support honesty.

Crises can also engulf the whole of society. The casual dismissal of questions about vaccine safety shows we have arrived at just such a societal crisis. A crisis of health and truth whose dimensions appear to dwarf anything civilisation as a whole has had to face in our lifetimes. The beginnings of this crisis are no doubt lost in history, but the turning point came when some decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry at the start of the pandemic decided it would be safe to unleash biotechnology on the general public. We are just at the beginning of this era. The WHO 2030 Agenda predicts that we will all be subject to hundreds of novel vaccines within the decade.

Biotechnology medicine was well known to be unsafe and inherently mutagenic pre-pandemic. Crucially it wasn’t so much what we knew, but what we didn’t know that constituted the colossal error of judgement, hubris, cruelty and greed. A single cell, the origin of life, contains an uncountable 100 trillion atoms organised into 42 million protein molecules and twenty thousand genes. Scientists have only a vague picture of how cells work. They have no idea how cells produce consciousness, how cells join together (37.2 trillion of them) to form a single human identity with amazing autonomic functions and immunity.

What we thought they knew can only be described as a crude notion put together from a few isolated facts derived from a countable number of experiments. Scientists don’t understand how intra-cellular transport and selection is managed. They only have a hazy comprehension of the role of electric fields, molecular shape, vibrational modes, so-called dark areas of our genome and multi-gene cooperative functions.

What we do know for certain is the immense precision involved and the vulnerability to even very small edits to their structure. Cells work very hard to protect this precision, each one completes over 70,000 self-repairs every day. With this in mind, it becomes very apparent that those working in the field of gene therapy knew from previous failures and disasters just how potentially dangerous Covid vaccines could be. Some did warn their superiors, who not only ignored them but set about telling the general public that that biotechnology was completely safe and near 100% infallible. This was a big lie, not to say the crime of the century.

As you no doubt know very well, once you have told one lie, it is very hard to avoid telling more lies which can eventually become a world of untruth that eats away at your conscience and peace. This has become the fate of society during the pandemic. No one is participating more enthusiastically than the fourth estate. Everyday, newspapers print articles claiming that excess deaths, which are running into millions world wide, are normal or non-existent and have nothing to do with the obvious culprit. Governments are looking the other way and piously washing their hands of the matter like Pontius Pilate, while medical authorities are busying themselves hiding the data and refusing to carry out tests and autopsies.

The new generation of biotech medicines are squarely aimed at editing the internal operation of cells, the control system that keeps our physiology and our life flying safely along. It shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that handicapping the pilot might crash the plane. The only surprise is that millions of crashed planes world wide are being ignored. We are living in a very different world from the one we thought we inhabited. I hope we are not so daft that we stop asking questions on the advice of those manifestly profiting from the pandemic.

After reporting earlier that there have been 100,000 extra UK deaths from heart disease alone, the Mail concludes by claiming without evidence that the number of vaccine-related deaths pales in comparison to the estimated 230,000 deaths that Covid inoculation has supposedly saved (???)—a figure widely disputed and believed to be wildly inflated. Even so 2 to 5 are not odds that I would accept if I had to put my life up as collateral, would you?

Articles like those today in the Daily Mail and the BBC, and there are many of them published everyday, are not just bad journalism, they are part of an insidious push to promote drugs that are known to harm people. They are intended to quiet the concern of people worldwide who are waking up to their tragic side effects and complete ineffectiveness. The purpose is manifestly the inflation of the profits of a trillion dollar industry who has proved itself callous and criminal, unfit to dominate public health policy as they do through revolving doors between regulators and industry insiders and through obscene advertising expenditure and gifts to medical professionals.

Image Credits

Photo by Chris on Unsplash