An article “Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine” has been published in the journal Open Forum of Infectious Diseases in their June 2023 issue. The study of 51,107 healthcare employees found that the bivalent vaccine was only a miserly 29% effective against the BA4/5 Covid variant which was in any case superseded by the BQ variant after which vaccine effectiveness dropped to 20%, and then, when the XBB variant began to dominate, effectiveness fell to zero. Yes zero, but not actually nothing; incredibly, repeated vaccination makes things worse.

This should be a familiar story. For decades, Coronaviruses have been well known to rapidly mutate and avoid vaccine protection. The fact that our government has launched an expensive promotional campaign to promote the bivalent vaccine, when it is proven to have zero effectiveness against the currently dominant XBB strain, speaks volumes about their incompetence.

But it is another finding of the study that is actually of far greater concern. The authors note:

“The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received….The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19”

The authors describe this finding as ‘unexpected’, but then go on to admit three other large studies have found similar results (see here, here, and here).

The inescapable conclusion:

mRNA Covid vaccines increase your risk of contracting Covid 19.

This substantiates those arguing that Covid vaccines ‘imprint’ the immune system and limit its flexibility to deal with infection. In simple terms, the immune system becomes stuck with not just an ineffective response, but it steps backwards. In technical terms, the authors conclude:

“Immune imprinting from prior exposure to different antigens in a prior vaccine and class switch toward noninflammatory spike-specific immunoglobulin G4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination have been suggested as possible mechanisms whereby prior vaccine may provide less protection than expected….it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed….The unexpected finding of increasing risk with increasing number of prior COVID-19 vaccine doses needs further study.”

You might think that this is the fact which governments and pharmaceutical firms most want to hide from the public, but you would be wrong. Quietly vaccine adverse effects have been piling up, hospitalisations increasing, and excess deaths rising. All at unprecedented record levels, but even this is not the most carefully hidden dirty secret. People have, after all, been figuring this out for themselves. Fewer and fewer people are taking the boosters because they obviously don’t prevent Covid infection. More and more people have been asking probing questions of their GP, because they don’t feel well.

The Biggest Secret Being Kept From the Public is the Use of Biotechnology Itself

Remember at the start of the vaccine programme, the government, pro-vaccine scientists and experts, the health department, the fact checkers, WHO, big pharma fact sheets and the media all took great pains to tell the public this was NOT an experimental vaccine. This was the biggest lie of all in need of near total protection from exposure.

It was important to everyone who sought to profit from the pandemic and the vaccines that biotech medicine should be seen as an extension of existing medicine. It isn’t.

When physics began to penetrate the nucleus of the atom, it was more than an extension of previous physics. The laws, the energy levels, the potential instability, and the nuclear particles all functioned under rules structurally different from those of earlier physics. Rules so different that the potential destructive outcomes dwarfed any previous man-made cataclysm. Since that time, nuclear technology has had to be guarded more carefully than any previous technology. The longevity and carcinogenic properties of nuclear waste and the threat of global annihilation have cast a shadow tens of thousands of years into the future.

mRNA vaccines penetrated, not the nucleus of the atom, but the cell wall and its nucleus—the very basis of life. mRNA and adenovirus vaccines are not mere extensions of modern medicine, they aim to redesign the cellular operation. Life begins with a single cell. The truly miraculous stability of human physiology and psychology was set to be altered.

It was already known that such interventions were mutagenic and highly risky, but against all common sense a decision was taken to press the launch button, not in a contained laboratory but in every country simultaneously altering every human life on the planet. It was essential for those seeking to profit from the new biotech era they have initiated, and remains essential, that the public should not know of the risks or the extreme novelty of what is being undertaken.

An analogy should make this clear. When a foreign power is seeking to insert their spy into the heart of a rival’s intelligence service, it is a time of the greatest sensitivity. No one must know what is being attempted. This action is going to place them in a position of superiority, and render their opponent’s intelligence ineffective. Until their mole is established, fully accepted, and above suspicion, it is vital that no one should suspect them.

Biotechnology medicine is a field that is conceived as a source of vast almost unimaginable profits. A field that will supersede much of conventional medicine and render it obsolete. The United States, UK and many other nations believe that their long term economic future and global superiority is intimately tied to the development, implementation, and promotion of patented systems of biotechnology medicine. A lot is at stake. Hence no one must know just how premature its implementation is and just how risky.

Biotechnology is a step far into the unknown, way too far. Scientists do not actually know how cellular genetic structures and functions support human consciousness, health, and development, yet they have been prepared to risk all this in a global spin of the roulette wheel. The ball has already come to rest on the wrong colour, but it is essential that no one knows, because like hopelessly addicted gamblers, the same scientists, corporations, and misinformed political hacks wish to spin the wheel again,…and again, ….because they are blinded by their own hubris, convinced that in the end they will win back their losses. But you cannot recoup human life.

Next time you read in the paper about the wonderful future of biotechnology, spare a thought for the cautious scientists who have found that mRNA vaccines are not just ineffective, they make things worse. They are gradually finding out just how terribly bad it could become. Biotechnology experimentation needs to be banned, the evidence is available now, the dirty secret is out of the bag.

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) has announced that the incidence of atrial fibrillation has increased by 50% over the last decade. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a condition which causes an irregular and often rapid heart rate. It can lead to stroke and heart failure. The BHF did not release any supporting figures by year which might point to a potential cause. Watch Dr. John Campbell describing as ‘astonishing’, both the huge rise in AF and the lack of detailed data.

Here in New Zealand heart disease is at record levels, but politicians of all parties are repeating again and again, along with their expert Dr. Michael Baker, that there are no excess deaths. As if repeating a lie will be enough to make it come true. However, the official tally of OECD statistics shows that in 2023 New Zealand deaths are running at an astonishing 18.2% above the long term average. The second highest rate among 31 OECD nations.

This doesn’t appear to matter one whit to our politicians who remain confident they are one source of truth, fully in control of mainstream media, backed by the medical establishment, able to censor social media, protected from the courts by parliamentary privilege, and not required to answer any questions.

It probably hasn’t escaped your notice that all these are recognised characteristics of cult leaders who systematically manipulate their followers and seek to exercise total control. To say that cults do not end well would be an understatement. Once your followers are sufficiently prepped to ignore fact, any crooked and perverted manipulation becomes a possibility.

Once indoctrinated, it is difficult to persuade cult followers they have been duped. Leaders ensure that every event that runs counter to their ideology is neatly fitted into their world view whether based on fact or not. It becomes especially damaging when the force of law is used to ensure compliance and eliminate redress.

You can hardly avoid news of sudden onset illness or unexpected deaths in the daily newspapers or among friends, but there is always an innocuous sounding cause on offer. If considered rationally, the unprecedented number of unusual deaths would render these excuses implausible. However, cults don’t do rational.

Quietly Disaster Has Been Creeping Up on Us

This brings us to a rather sad realisation—with all the elected political parties complicit in Covid policy, it is almost ludicrous to believe that the coming election will change anything. Prepandemic, our current situation was almost inconceivable, but quietly disaster has been creeping up on us.

Published in 2020, an article in Harvard University Health Publishing gives us a hint. Senior Editor Robert Shmerling argues that it is not possible or even practical as a medical practitioner to be guided by “to do no harm” as the Hippocratic oath suggests, instead saying:

You can’t tell ahead of time whether a test or treatment will ‘do no harm’.

In other words, it has become widely accepted in medical practice that adverse events are inevitable and unpredictable. This is an argument that seeks to justify the irresponsible push for risky and dangerous biotech medicine and experimentation at any cost.

So what will change minds? When you look at Ponzi schemes, dictators, and cults, the answer is always the same. They end when total disaster strikes. Just how high will excess deaths have to rise before the powers that be accept that a giant mistake has been made?

Inside the Covid cult there are a few cracks appearing in the safe and effective narrative. It has quietly become acceptable for doctors to privately advise their patients that they might be vaccine injured, for pathologists to advise the children of friends that they should avoid Covid vaccination, for vaccinologists to say they won’t be getting any more boosters. These are small steps that indicate a direction of change, they also indicate that those at the health frontline know that something has gone radically wrong.

However, the political and media endorsement of biotechnology remains near total. Given the weight of Covid science publishing, there is no justification for this.

The suggestion that New Zealand’s pandemic policy has been world beating is a hollow lie, pandering to notions of national pride and allegiance. Like the medicos who think it is impossible to “to do no harm”, politicians are actually denying the obvious. By doing so they are tacitly endorsing inevitable deaths in the course of policy. This is a very militaristic, self-obsessed, and flawed way to think—glorious sacrifice—“Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die”.

Pandemic policy has stolen our bodily autonomy and our right to medical choice. It has overruled nature’s design of immunity and health. It has debased truth, substituting government pronouncement. It has seized control of children from families and whanau. It has inserted propaganda into education. It has rendered employees subservient. It has cancelled dialogue.

In short, it has taken the world in which we thought we lived and turned it upside down. It is no good thinking this is a battle between right and left. That too is a story to keep everyone distracted from the real issues. It is a question of what kind of fundamental individual rights can we retain? Rights that we previously took for granted.

By framing the world as vaccinated vs unvaccinated, political power backed by pharmaceutical money has redrawn ideological boundaries along the lines of novel biotechnologies. This is a giant act of deception that completely ignores the transhumanism involved.

When I was growing up, we gave thanks for the harvest. The modern age has joined in the cult of biotechnology, this seems to offer supremacy over nature, but it hasn’t worked. To succeed, to know, to enjoy you have to work with nature.

The hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program. Which means that if you choose to buy the book mentioned in the next paragraph, we may recieve a small commission at not extra cost to you.

I have just finished reading “The History of the World in 100 Plants” by Simon Barnes. Barnes concludes: we are descended from the biodiversity and bioabundance of plants. “Look at this planet and its uncountable plants. We owe them everything”. Taittiriya Upanishad confirms “life-breath is indeed food.” We depend entirely on the natural world around us, yet biotechnology is seeking to overthrow this mutual interdependency and substitute a ephemeral figment of man’s imagination and pride—an impossible dream and a hideous nightmare that puts our continued existence at risk.

Voting for today’s crop of politicians is a forlorn hope, it is a blank check for continued biotechnology experimentation on ourselves. It is a licence to adulterate our traditional food sources and place them in the hands of unscrupulous biotechnology megacorporations.

There may be ways to restore individual health. Plants are our evolutionary forebears. They supported and helped create the genetic stability that we have enjoyed until today, hopefully, their intelligent use through diet and herbal traditions can help restore public health. A precondition of progress is the recognition of mistakes, the cessation of biotech vaccines for humans and animals, renewed protections of pure natural foods, and a recognition of their role in maintaining health.

This is not a time to give up our rights, and hand them to the same politicians who have already laughed at medical choice and mocked those suffering serious adverse events, who have run roughshod over our Bill of Rights. They don’t deserve our vote. Under their leadership it could all begin again.

A study of data from 1.5 million subjects in the US healthcare system reveals an increased risk of blindness over two years following mRNA vaccination.

Updated: 6:00 PM 22 May 2023

Fortunately, many people are waking up to a multi-billion dollar web of self-interest promoted by our government, the health establishment, the pharmaceutical/biotech industry, and legacy media…. but not everyone. True to form, the NZ Herald this morning leads with a lament, apparently only a minority of eligible New Zealanders have risked taking the bivalent vaccine.

In support of its call to vaccinate yet again, the Herald article cites a study published by Cambridge University Press which looks at “Inequities in COVID-19 Omicron infections and hospitalisations for Māori and Pacific people in Te Manawa Taki Midland region, New Zealand”. A close look at the study reveals now familiar deficiencies that we have discussed in the pages of the Hatchard Report before:

• As expected, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is anyone who is actually unvaccinated + anyone who had a single dose. The paper should be tossed in the bin for this alone.
• The paper doesn’t specify whether or not they consider someone vaccinated in the first week after receiving their shot, but probably they are using Ministry of Health definitions which discard the crucial first week of data following mRNA vaccination thereby omitting adverse outcomes.
• Many people were admitted to hospital for causes unrelated to Covid between February and May but still tested positive. This factor was only removed in early July when they started filtering for unrelated morbidities.
• The study data time frame was February to June 2022. This was an interesting period. ‘Efficacy’ against Covid hospitalisation and mortality started in favour of boosters, but crossed over by May as the vaccine efficacy wore off and then entered negative territory. In other words, after May 2022 boosted individuals had a higher chance of Covid infection and death than the unvaccinated. The study would have got a very different set of results if they had considered May-September as well or instead.

If you take a broad sample of recently published research, it seems avoiding repeated Covid vaccination could be a very significant and safe choice.

Increased Risk of Blindness Over Two Years Following mRNA Vaccination

A very large and carefully specified study published in prestigious journal Nature of US healthcare data involving 1.5 million subjects has found that your risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) doubles within the two years following Covid vaccination when compared to unvaccinated individuals (see here for a detailed explanation of the study findings by Dr. Mobeen Syed).

The results are especially alarming because all categories of people whose health history and drug use might lead to a propensity to suffer from RVO were excluded from the study. The two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and previous hospitalisation. In other words, the results point very clearly to a doubling of risk for those receiving mRNA vaccines.

The retina is the layer of tissue at the back of the inner eye that converts light images to nerve signals and sends them to the brain. Retinal vein occlusion is a blockage of the small veins that carry blood away from the retina. It is most often caused by the formation of a blood clot which blocks the flow of blood through the retina and causes severe damage to the blood vessels and the retina itself.

Retinal vascular occlusion involves the loss of sight in the affected eye; in simple terms it leads to blindness. Many people suffering from retinal vascular occlusion do regain some vision naturally. However, vision rarely returns to normal. There is no known intervention to reverse or open retinal vascular blockages. Older people are especially vulnerable to retinal vascular occlusion, the same people our government and Te Whatu Ora are vigorously targeting to take another Covid shot.

It seems Te Whatu Ora is suffering from selective blindness itself. It is so keen to promote its vaccine uptake strategy, that it is not keeping up to date with the increasingly long list of concerning mRNA Covid vaccine adverse effect studies, and certainly not informing the public about these risks.

So What Sort of Blood Clots Develop as a Result of mRNA Vaccination, and How Do They Form?

Considering that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes has increased dramatically, you would think that funded research could prioritise research in this area, but in the post Covid vaccine era, you would of course be wrong. Everyone involved with promoting biotech vaccines is busy looking the other way.

This article contains microscopy photos of unusual blood clots found in the arteries of suddenly deceased individuals. They contain relatively large fibrous, crystalline, and wire-like structures, not the cellular agglomerations of typical blood clots. These cannot normally be observed until autopsies are performed. Micro clots are another type of risk.

The retinal vascular occlusion study suggests mechanisms for micro clot formation, including molecular mimicry of the Spike-protein and/or heparin suppression. Heparin is the factor which prevents platelet aggregation or micro clotting. The retinal arteries and veins are unusual in as much as small pathogenic micro clots forming in the blood can be directly observed in the eye. Moreover, their effects are immediately apparent to the patient and the treating physician. This opens a possible window into the study of the formation of blood clots following mRNA vaccination and their treatment.

Increasingly the New Zealand government’s Covid policy looks blinkered, defensive, and deceptive. Last week, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) released a tender for a major contract to provide ‘insights to build an empirical picture of the disinformation landscape.’ The newly appointed disinformation Tsar (at a cost of $450,000), whoever they are, will do well to look into the government itself. It might have become the principal source of misinformation in the nation.

According to Mintel, which styles itself as the world’s leading Market Intelligence agency, 2023 is the year of “hyperfatigue”—a state of continual physical, emotional and mental exhaustion. In a recent UK survey, 35% of people said they were too tired to make healthy changes to their diet and activity levels, suggesting many are in a vicious circle of fatigue-induced self-sabotage, leading to more fatigue.

Cancer Research UK, estimates that 40% of all cases of cancer could be avoided if more people lived healthier lives, for example by eating more healthily, being active, maintaining a normal weight, avoiding sunburn and not smoking, but we’re not taking their advice. Basically, we’re too tired to tackle our tiredness.

So what has made 2023 so unusually fatigued? Might it have something to do with an infectious disease almost certainly created in a laboratory possibly as part of a bioweapon development programme along with a misnamed vaccine, also created in a biolab, that doesn’t work and appears to make people sick? You tell me.

There are an increasing number of unwell people suffering from conditions which studies show might be caused or complicated by mRNA vaccination, but the government is keeping quiet and relying on hyperfatigue and its own one source of truth doctrine to prevent people looking any deeper. We recently heard from a young acquaintance who informed us of their heart disease diagnosis. They remained not just uninformed of the possible cause, but also reassured by government advertising that Covid vaccines are safe.

You don’t have to look very far for a cause these days. A Japanese paper published last week outlines the case of a man who developed myocarditis immediately after the administration of his fifth shot. Hospitalisations are at record levels, our health system is under siege, …..and winter is coming.

Corrected and updated: 14 May 2023

We have arrived at a point in an election year when our votes matter, so expect some surprising replies to our emails and even some answers to our questions. BUT, if today was anything to go by, it won’t be without fireworks.

Yesterday, I fact checked David Seymour, who, in his Reality Check Radio interview, had asserted very strongly that New Zealand has had no excess deaths. I used the statistical graphical interface from the Human Mortality Database run by the University of California and the Max Planck Institute in Germany to generate charts to illustrate Seymour’s misunderstanding. This interface queried the same official data as Our World in Data referred to by David Seymour.

Once you factor in the absence of seasonal flu in 2021, these charts illustrate very clearly that New Zealand has had elevated rising rates of excess deaths beginning in 2021 and continuing since.

Clinging to Total Lunacy

However, David Seymour and Rachel Beauchamp, his Executive Assistant, wrote to a number of correspondents this morning (12 May) rejecting the information I posted. David stood by his assessment that deaths in New Zealand were below historical averages. In fact, a little bit more than that, David said that anyone who clings to the idea that mRNA vaccines killed anyone is in his words “clinging to total lunacy” (???).

In February, the New Zealand Herald, that bastion of mainstream Covid orthodoxy, published an article entitled “New Zealand records biggest increase in registered deaths in 100 years” The Herald article referred to 2022 mortality figures.

From the headline, it won’t have escaped your notice that the excess deaths have become so large that even the Herald wasn’t able to ignore them, but politicians apparently can. So who are the lunatics now?

The Herald article did its best to downplay the significance of so many people dying:

It began its statistical sleight of hand by comparing 2022 to 2021 rather than the historical average of deaths.

Then mentioned that 2020 had very low deaths because border controls and lockdowns kept seasonal flu and respiratory illness at very low levels. That is true, but it forgot to mention that the same controls and no flu conditions applied to most of 2021 as well.

A Lot of People Are Dying

Was it just a selective memory that made David forget that the Herald had published the official record of elevated excess deaths? Should we expect the Ministry of Health to warn politicians about the elevated number of people dying? Or have they been making sure that the concerning data has a low profile in order to protect themselves from criticism? Is it all going very wrong for the Covid vaccination lobby? Are they panicking? What do you think?

No worries though, the Herald called in that well worn epidemiologist Michael Baker, who for the first time seemed to admit that something might be going wrong. Rather than claiming, as he has previously, that New Zealand has no excess deaths, he started reminiscing about the great success in the initial years of the pandemic, (presumably 2020 when we had no Covid, no vaccines, no flu, and very few doubts about Michael Baker).

In his email, David Seymour asserted that New Zealand has negative excess deaths (less than expected from historical trends). The fundamental of this assertion is that if you average the very low death totals from 2020 with subsequent years, you can make the excess deaths in 2021, 2022, and 2023 look a lot less concerning.

This cumulative averaging of deaths used by Michael Baker, tends to hide what is really going on. In fact, unexplained New Zealand excess deaths are getting larger year by year since 2020. It also avoids facing the fact that hospital admissions are also getting larger year by year and disproportionately affecting the vaccinated. Like the rise in deaths, hospital admissions began to rise in 2021, before we had Covid, but after we had the vaccine rollout, despite the relative absence of seasonal flu.

The Elephant in the Corner of the Room is Becoming Too Large to Ignore

We have reached a point now where the elephant in the corner of the room is becoming too large to ignore. The record-breaking mortality figures from 2022 were complicated by the high number deaths recorded as Covid related. These have tailed off in 2023. Therefore the continuing high rate of excess deaths is doubly concerning.

Have we entered the phase of political disbelief, when it becomes clear that something has gone terribly wrong, but no one wants to accept responsibility? In which misdirection and finger pointing become routine responses.

David Seymour wants us to doubt our sanity. Public health should not be a political football, it is a matter of life and death. Right now, while death is getting the upper hand, no one in authority wants to accept responsibility or do anything about it.

New Zealand is not alone. Overnight the UK Mirror published an article ‘Brits are dying in their tens of thousands – and we don’t really have any idea why‘ It continued:

“Tens of thousands more Brits died than usual from May to December 2022, excluding Covid as a cause of death, raising serious questions as to why so many died”. 

It described the figures as “shocking.”

Professor David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, told the Mirror:

“a lot of Brits are dying, but not necessarily of a specific cause”. 

After talking to the experts and considering everything from hot summers to obesity to dementia to flu to old age to demographic changes, the Mirror concludes:

“This still leaves tens of thousands of dead Brits, with no clear explanation as to quite how they died”.

New Zealand Excess Deaths 18% Above the Five-Year Average

Just as in New Zealand, the high level of excess deaths in the UK is continuing unabated. The week ending April 21 2023, the Office of National Statistics reported excess deaths were 21% above the five year average. That is 2540 excess deaths in one week alone. Currently, in New Zealand, 2023 excess deaths are running at 18% above the five year average, a very comparable figure.

For two years we have been writing about published scientific research containing evidence of increased illness related to Covid vaccination—cancers, heart disease, myocarditis, kidney disease, strokes, neurological illness, etc. These are all conditions with long term implications for health and longevity. We seem to be facing these consequences now, but the government and the health authorities are looking the other way.

The level of polarisation around the issue of Covid vaccine safety is highly concerning. This is a time to carefully examine the excess mortality and hospitalisation data by age, vaccination status, and disease category. Instead, we are finding that considerable efforts are being made to ensure data is hidden from the public. It is especially concerning to find the leaders of New Zealand political parties continuing to push the idea of vaccine safety in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.

Please continue to speak up. The more sane voices we can raise, the greater the chance of someone finally taking these excess deaths seriously.

A preprint paper published this month, shows that IgG4 antibodies are present in the umbilical cord blood of infants born to vaccinated mothers, highlighting a theoretical risk to newborns of an ineffective response to Covid infection. This highlights just how many unknowns we are dealing with when it comes to assessing what will be the long term outcomes of mRNA vaccination.

BUT was this really unknown to those recommending that mRNA vaccination was safe for pregnant women? Documents released by Pfizer under court order reveal that Pfizer and the FDA were well aware of clinical trial results indicating appalling outcomes for babies of pregnant women.

Watch this 20 minute video where dozens of so-called New Zealand experts are recorded telling us that the mRNA Covid vaccines are completely safe for pregnant women in direct contradiction of Pfizer trial results available in April 2021. These indicated an unfolding disaster for babies, including miscarriage, premature birth, cardiac arrest, toxic breast milk, spike protein crossing the placenta, etc.

In the video, their comments are juxtaposed with scientists exposing the highly disturbing content of the Pfizer trials of pregnancy outcomes.

Was the New Zealand Government Aware of This Information?

Certainly, the contractual arrangements that our government had made with Pfizer would have required Pfizer to fully inform the Ministry of Health of all the results of vaccine trials.

BUT the Ministry of Health has completely ignored the information which has become public knowledge. From 1st May 2023, they are again encouraging pregnant and breastfeeding mothers from 16 and up to get a further booster shot. Why? Especially considering the increased incidence of miscarriages and stillbirths since the New Zealand vaccine rollout began.

I can’t imagine at this point in time a more important video to watch than this 20 minute film of our experts lining up to misinform prospective mothers of safety. Were they misled by Pfizer, by the Ministry of Health, by politicians, by the FDA, or by all of the above. OR did they just decide to promote a safety rating without even any evidence to back up their statements? We may never know, but the lesson of this video is clear, we will not be able to trust the medical czars again.