Dear Media Representatives

It has been 5 long years since the earliest COVID-19 cases were noticed in November 2019. Last Saturday, I gave a talk in Whangarei where I was able to look back, discuss the way ahead and answer questions.  I reached the conclusion that we need a review. We need to take a long hard look at the events and outcomes of the last five years and then have some serious conversations. 

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

The role of journalists is not just to entertain, but to tell us what is going on in society. They look for truths under the surface and behind the scenes and then share their insights. They are unafraid to ask questions, even if the answers are sometimes unpalatable.

Newspapers and media reports are full these days of personal tragedies, more people dying too early, including young people with cancer or diseases that used to be rarely seen. However, few deep questions are being asked. It is the unprecedented sudden increase in the rate of these events during the pandemic that needs investigation and analysis.

Journalists worth their salt would be asking why the cancer statistics have not been published since 2019? Why are our hospitals overcrowded as never before? Why exactly are we falling ill, what with, and what are the numbers? Why are we frequently off work sick? Why have disability rates soared? Why are young people being affected as never before (see here and here)? Why is there a mental health crisis? Why are mortality stats elevated?

As we have been reporting at the Hatchard Report and GLOBE for nearly four years now, the weight of published scientific evidence points to a unique health crisis that is man-made. With a better understanding of the risks of gene editing, early warnings and more caution this might have been prevented. There are simple lessons to be learned, lessons that need to be reported in the media and widely discussed in society.

COVID-19 itself is a virus which most now believe with good reason was designed in a lab and then escaped. It uses the spike proteins on its surface to attach itself to a human cell. It then fuses with the cell and manufactures copies of itself. As we remarked early in the pandemic, being the result of genetic engineering rather than of zoonotic origin, it was likely to be unstable and suffer a high rate of mutation. This has proved to be the case. Multiple variants of COVID-19 have proved highly adept at evading vaccines and hiding from the immune system for long periods of time in various parts of our physiology, causing the symptoms of Long Covid.

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are designed to breach the human cell membrane and repurpose the cell to produce spike proteins in the hope that our immune system will then learn to recognise and control the COVID-19 virus which has spikes on its surface. In the event, these COVID-19 vaccines have not proved effective, it is now even apparent that multiple vaccine doses encourage rather than prevent Covid infection. Moreover the spike protein is now recognised as a cardio toxin and the mRNA vaccine a deterrent to our immune functions. 

Thus both the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines utilise mechanisms which are destructive of cell integrity. Cellular integrity is at the basis of health. Our life begins with a single cell which multiplies to become the 37 trillion cells of the fully grown person. Each of these cells contains the same genetic identity. Each person has a genetic identity which differs from all other people in some respects. The ultimate purpose of the immune system is to protect and preserve the unique genetic identity of an individual’s cells.

The whole cell, nucleus, cytoplasm and membrane, is the wheelhouse of the boat of life. That first cell and all subsequent cells contain our capacity for experience, intelligence, drive and emotions. It contains our individual history and the history of our family and race. It supports our consciousness, our capacity to be awake. Everything that we treasure in life relies upon the integrity of our cells. Biotechnology knows very, very little if anything about how these precious human attributes are supported by our genetics. Both the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines are designed to disrupt and repurpose cellular genetic functions and they do so on a vast scale, affecting billions of cells. As we have written previously, this threatens not just our health but who we are. It can leave life adrift without an anchor.

A crime without a name

None of these risks are strangers to science, they were well known to researchers in the field before the pandemic. What is strange is the determination of the biotechnology industry to plough ahead with risky genetic experiments whose results could not be contained, not just might but actually did escape and spread without limit and could not be recalled. The commercial arm of biotechnology ignored these dangers and exposed the whole of humanity to the extreme risks during the COVID-19 pandemic. And still risky experimentation continues.

The risks were obvious to everyone working in the biotech field from the outset. So why did they go ahead? In 2014, Jennifer Doudna, the inventor of CRISPR gene editing had a dream. In it, a fellow researcher took her to meet Adolf Hitler who was sitting ready with pen and paper and asking “I want to understand the uses and implications of this amazing technology you have developed”. Doudna recalled, in an interview with her biographer Walter Isaacson, “I was jolted awake from the nightmare. As I lay in the dark, my heart racing, I couldn’t escape the awful premonition with which the dream had left me”. She began to have trouble sleeping at night, fearing she had created a toolbox for future Frankensteins who would pervert her work.

In January 2015 at a conference of biotechnology researchers in the Napa Valley and during subsequent meetings, her thinking changed. The excitement generated by hundreds of biotech researchers gathered together reinforcing each other swayed her opinion. She decided that gene editing could do some good. She and her colleagues rejected the idea that gene editing was unnatural. In her mind Doudna began to minimise the prospect of risks. In the end, the conference participants and the biotech industry as a whole resolved to fight any attempt to regulate or limit their work. This opened Pandora’s box, setting the stage for the COVID-19 pandemic which was just a few years away.

As many as ten million people have died during the last five years as a result of the pandemic, insurance data suggests four times this number have suffered some form of lasting health disability. At the Hatchard Report we have documented that the balance of evidence favours Covid vaccination as the main culprit, but whether these injuries were from COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccines is to a large extent immaterial. All of the deaths resulted from biotechnology experimentation. 

I am reminded of Winston Churchill’s response when he received confirmation of the Nazi holocaust: “We are in the presence of a crime without a name”.

The crime is even more strange because it is not at all clear exactly who is to blame. It is not just one person leading the charge. There has been a collective failure of intelligence. Millions of people worldwide have been trained in colleges and universities, and even in schools, to edit genes using CRISPR technology. They have been told that this will lead to a bright future free of disease and encouraged to make a profession out of it. Entrepreneurs have invested heavily and governments generously funded the commercial endeavours that spring out of each new discovery in the hope of a health breakthrough, but little of use has emerged except literally heart break.

Many people who have become involved in the commercial biotech juggernaut, including those in the media and PR industry writing about it, are unaware of the risks. It is as if they were given inaccurate directions, took a wrong turn and suddenly found themselves in the wrong part of town at the wrong time. Vast sums of money have been spent on public relations and AI designed to promote a biotechnology future. Much of this is written by hidden persuaders who have little scientific knowledge themselves. In most cases they are simply doing their best to earn a living using the inaccurate and misleading information that has been fed to them.

Western countries have been persuaded that genetic editing is a scientific miracle that is going to make life better. 80% of people have been COVID-19 vaccinated and ‘educated’ to accept a ‘safe and effective’ narrative. As a result it is hard to change public opinion and the course of events that has been set in motion. However the weight of mainstream published scientific evidence has increasingly moved against the safety of COVID-19 vaccination. News outlets around the world are beginning to acknowledge COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects. Even the BBC, a bastion of pro-vaccine PR, has recently publicized vaccine harms, albeit a few years late as called out by GB News.

Here in New Zealand, we are probably the least informed among western nations about the origins of COVID-19 and the risks of COVID-19 vaccination. Unfortunately, the rejection of an informed and cautious approach is beginning to appear deliberate on the part of those who edit media content. Take this for example: on 21st October the Boston Globe published an article “People in their 30s and 40s are facing an unprecedented wave of memory problems“. The Globe is behind a paywall so it is unlikely that many Kiwis read it. Luckily, RNZ and the New Zealand Herald picked it up, but were we actually lucky? NO, we were not.

The Globe article reported that memory lapses are expected as we age, but examined evidence that many surprisingly young people are suddenly losing their grip. It found that for the 15 years prior to the pandemic the numbers affected had remained steady, but then increased rapidly by 33% (affecting one million more young people in America) following the start of the pandemic. This is a red flag: a sudden increase coinciding with the pandemic. The implication was not lost on the Globe which left its readers able to connect the dots. The NZ rehash of the Globe report didn’t mention the actual figures or the timing and merely fobbed off its readers with the suggestion we have too much information these days, advising us to watch a little less TV. We were being dumbed down, just when we should be shaken awake.

That is our message today: shake off the lethargy, stand up for journalism as it should be. Ask the hard questions. Demand the facts and figures, they are being hidden and need to be exposed to fresh air. One thing is sure, a lot of long held conventional opinions need to be revisited and investigated. Times have moved on irrevocably and we need to rediscover where we stand in the changed landscape. Journalists have a vital role to play in this process. We have to evolve out of the pandemic. We need to educate ourselves about the hidden and truly serious dangers of gene editing. Forewarned is forearmed.

There is Safe and Effective Roadshow visiting Queenstown, Dunedin, Nelson and Wellington organised near the beginning of November. I hope you take the opportunity to attend and report the debate. We have never needed this more keenly. The time is now.

Sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

How has Health New Zealand missed a massive death signal among young age groups in New Zealand following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination?

New OIA data shows a 188% rise in the 3 month mortality risk among the 12-19 age group following mRNA vaccination and an 83% rise in the 20-30 age group.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

An OIA HNZ00064867 released 22 October 2024 under freedom of information by Health New Zealand lists the number of people in 2021 and 2022 who died within 93 days (3 months) of receiving a Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, broken down by age.

During this 2021/22 period some 12 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered to the New Zealand population of 5 million. Official figures have already revealed that all cause mortality rose in 2021 in tandem with the COVID-19 vaccination program despite the absence of COVID-19 infection and flu which was mostly due to New Zealand border closures. In 2022 New Zealand all cause deaths were 38,574 (7.4 deaths/1000 population) and in 2019 they were 34,260 (6.9 deaths/1000 population). This is an increase of 7.8%. This figure is concerning and we have previously discussed the implications at length.

The newly released OIA data allows us to find out if the excess mortality rate of any age bracket has been disproportionately affected in the 3 months following COVID-19 vaccination during 2021 and 2022.

There are 552,000 teenagers in the 12-19 age bracket. 58% of this group were vaccinated during 2021/22

There are 687,000 people aged 20-30 in New Zealand. 78% of this group were vaccinated during 2021/22.

Very few of either age group received booster shots during the time period.

The OIA reported there were 67 deaths recorded within 93 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the 12-19 age bracket for 2021/22

There were 166 deaths recorded within 93 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the 20-30 age bracket for 2021/22.

1st and 2nd shots were recommended to be given at a 21 day interval.

Allowing for the vaccination coverage rate, over the two year period the 12-19 age group as a whole were within 93 days of a COVID-19 vaccination for just 9% of the time. Yet their 3 month deaths (67) accounted for 26% of the total number of deaths (254) in their age bracket over the two year period. An increased mortality risk of 188%

The 20-30 age group as a whole were within 93 days of a COVID-19 vaccination for 12% of the time over the 2 years. Yet their 3 month deaths (166) accounted for 22% of the total number of deaths (762) in their age bracket over the two year period. That is an increased mortality risk of 83%.

The other age brackets covered by the OIA (30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and 71+) had a 3 month mortality risk relatively close to the elevated all cause mortality risk for the period. None of these age groups had a disproportionately elevated mortality risk, merely the already mentioned excess death rate.

What the data means explained in the simplest possible terms:

The 12-19 and 20-30 age brackets had a disproportionate mortality risk in the 3 months following vaccination. This may have contributed to the deaths of as many as 40 teenagers and 70 people in their twenties. It greatly increases the likelihood that a number of unexplained or unexpected deaths noted among the younger age brackets occurring in 2021 and 2022 were caused by mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. By implication the health, including long term health, of thousands more may have been adversely affected. These figures are very alarming. How were they missed?

The last published Medsafe Safety Report up to November 2022 records that a total of 184 deaths had been reported to CARM as adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. Medsafe itself admits that this figure is very likely to be grossly under-reported. At the time, Medsafe determined that 163 of the reported deaths were unlikely to be related to vaccination, 15 could not be assessed, while 6 cases were possibly linked to the vaccines. In other words, they publicly dismissed almost any association between COVID-19 vaccines and mortality.

Medsafe dismissed any association by claiming that only a very limited list of disease types could ever be the result of a vaccination. Thus people dying from heart attacks, strokes, sudden onset cancers, types of neurological illness, unexplained sudden death, accidents due to brain fog, acute kidney illness and suicide were all excluded as unrelated. We now know that all of these categories of illness could be related to adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Yesterday in our article “Mental Health, Genetics, and Covid Vaccine Adverse Effects” we reported published findings and scientific reasoning showing that the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines have a very broad spectrum which encompasses the above illness categories. Moreover there is also evidence showing an increased health and mortality risk from the COVID-19 vaccines continues long past three months. How have Health New Zealand missed the implications? Perhaps they haven’t.

In our article “Staggering New Data From Health New Zealand and Others” we reported an OIA documenting a massive rise in Accident and Emergency presentations for chest pain among the under forties. Currently standing at around 30,000 per year, up from 4,400 in 2020. Health New Zealand has not issued a public comment. Nor have the New Zealand media published the figures. 

Our concerns run deeper than negligence.

We have been aware for some time of persistent but unsubstantiated and undocumented rumours reaching us from a number of independent sources reportedly close to families who had young family members who died subsequent to COVID-19 vaccination and who are reported to have received 6 figure compensation sums from the government on the condition set by an NDA that they not talk about the matter publicly.

We are raising this matter publicly now because of the mortality and health data disclosed by the recent OIA data and published studies which add credence to the claim that the health of a significant number of younger age groups are likely to have been substantially affected subsequent to vaccination. Although we do not have a copy of any such NDA, if they do exist our legal advice suggests that the secrecy requirements contained in an NDA, depending on its terms, may be challenged in the courts and could be deemed illegal. We can put anyone who feels they may have been affected in touch with legal representation up to date with the issue. Certainly any attempt to silence people adversely affected by a public health initiative appears to run contrary to New Zealand law.

If these rumours are true, they indicate that sections of the government knew or suspected that there was a mortality risk. If they are not true, this in no way detracts from the seriousness of the elevated mortality risk for young age groups following COVID-19 vaccination documented above.

If such payments did take place, we suppose the intent of the government would have been to prevent widespread public vaccine hesitancy. Essentially that would have been a part of their openly avowed strategy to dismiss some expert warnings and any notion that the completely novel and largely untried genetic mRNA vaccine method might pose unique risks or that the risks outweighed any protective effect.

In any case, the figures we report today suggest that there should have been an entirely different response. If the mortality data had been critically examined at the time, as it should have been, it would have revealed a significant death signal for younger age groups. If Health New Zealand had set aside its prejudicial faith in the word ‘vaccine’ and assessed the data as it came to hand, there could have been a different outcome. Considering it was known very early on that younger people had an almost zero mortality risk from COVID-19 infection itself, this should have led to an early cessation of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine rollout. There should have been no pressure exerted on schools, school children, university students and parents to get young people vaccinated, quite the reverse.

Two years ago we published an article “How Can People In Power Lie So Comfortably” in which we commented on some unexpected deaths of children. The death of any child or young person reverberates through extended families and whanau. It drags the whole society down in shock, grief, confusion and regret. It blights the future. Now we know all this might have been avoided.

Instead, the mortality risk, if known or suspected in the inner circles of Health New Zealand, was never made public knowledge. The opposite in fact. To this day Health New Zealand publicity misleadingly claims that COVID-19 vaccination is generally safe and necessary.

We have published these figures in the public interest well aware that, as we have repeatedly asked, a comprehensive analysis of population wide comparative health outcomes of the New Zealand public subsequent to the COVID-19 vaccination rollout should be made or the full data set released for public scrutiny. This needs to include vaccination status by date and age along with health outcomes and mortality data by date and type.

The data used in our analysis comes exclusively from OIAs and Official Health New Zealand and Stats New Zealand websites. Health New Zealand vaccination data is usually published with the following disclaimer:

“Data are sourced from the Aotearoa Immunisation Register (AIR) and may be subject to any data quality issues still to be resolved in AIR, which includes, but is not limited to: Incorrect vaccination event dates, miscoding of vaccination given, miscoded indication code and miscoding of person to vaccination event. Note that these data quality issues are largely attributed to the fact that many fields within AIR are free text and are therefore prone to data entry errors.”

As a result, the exact margin of error of the New Zealand COVID-19 statistics is unknown, but the calculated mortality signals contained in the latest OIA are so large that they should be a matter of great public concern. Failing to raise the matter in any public forum constitutes a breach of public trust and the New Zealand Bill of Rights. This information should be distributed as widely as possible. The carefully crafted PR myth of COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy needs to be exploded. It doesn’t fit real life New Zealand Health data. Disregarding a risk to children is unconscionable.

This article investigates why COVID-19 vaccines have such a broad spectrum of adverse effects. It offers some deep insights and ways forward.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

An analysis published in the Journal of the European Society of Medicine entitled “Suspected Causes of the Specific Intolerance Profile of Spike-Based Covid-19 Vaccines (Review/Analysis)” investigates some specific reasons why COVID-19 vaccines cause such a broad spectrum of adverse effects. It concludes:

“The exceptionally wide range, frequency and severity of reported adverse reactions associated with spike-based Covid-19 vaccination exceeds the known level of conventional vaccination. This is a cause for serious concern.  From a pharmacological point of view, spikes are highly potent substances, and they are not innocuous antigens. Therefore, they do NOT appear to be suitable for preventive immunisation against comparatively harmless infections [such as Covid-19].”

It reported that COVID-19 infection rates in the general population were higher after vaccination programmes began in 2021 than before in 2020. Following vaccination, spike proteins are distributed very broadly in the physiology where they are associated with the development of organ dysfunction over an extended period of time. The author writes:

“An overwhelming body of evidence supports the consequences of the main mode of action of spike-based COVID-19 vaccines, namely the down-regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) by spikes. This  enzyme….is not only responsible for cardiovascular homeostasis, but is also involved in pro-inflammatory, procoagulant, pro-fibrotic and immunological effects via its main vasoconstrictor effector, angiotensin II.” 

This is a step towards explaining the magnitude and diversity of the spectrum of adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and the mechanisms, but only a step in that direction. There are many other researchers investigating the basis for broad scale effects of COVID-19 vaccines over extended periods of time following inoculation. 

Writing under the tag line Nepetalactone Newsletter, a paper on Substack reports evidence of a positive tumour biopsy one year after vaccination which can be linked back to BNT162b2 plasmid DNA replication. Disturbingly, the paper reports a previously recognised bio-molecular mechanism which can enable the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to be self-replicating and thereby subject to spreading in a population through genetic shedding.

Both these papers are highly technical in nature, but essentially point to dysfunction in immunoprotective mechanisms. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise that immune mechanisms protect us from not just one disease or a specific group of diseases but all diseases.

An initiative in Australia has highlighted some of the dangers of plasmid DNA contamination of COVID-19 vaccines referred to in the Substack paper. Following a comprehensive presentation from experts which included Australian test results, it received support from the Local Council in Port Hedland. They sent a letter to every one of the 537 Australian Local Councils saying:

“We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption.”

The council will also send letters to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines. For a full review of the Port Hedland discussions and support go here. This offers some hope that, with the publication of studies like those referenced above, the tide of public and government opinion may start to turn.

So just how broad are the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines? 

A Substack report from Pierre Kory MD asks “Are Medical Errors On the Rise Due To Cognitive Impacts Of The mRNA Vaccine?“. This is a deep dive into a subject that we have often addressed at the Hatchard Report here and here. Kory reviews the published literature documenting cognitive decline subsequent to mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, as we have also in our earlier articles, and then goes on to report his own observation of increased incidence of medical misadventure which he attributes to brain fog caused by COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. He cites increased incidence of disability claims, VAERS reports of cognitive disorder, insurance claims and traffic accidents as corroborating data. 

In our articles at GLOBE here and here, we have suggested that mRNA vaccines can degrade intelligence. We formulated a general proposition that: intelligence is proportional to measures of coherent functioning in physiology. In other words, consciousness is supported by a network of trillions of cells that can function coherently only as long as each cell contains identical genetic material. We have described this as a biofield phenomenon. Crucially, the defining characteristic of human consciousness is its self-referral capacity. No one in the field of biology understands how our cellular genetics supports the expression of this function in human consciousness, but the principles of physical science allied with the received knowledge of cultural traditions can offer some vital insights.

An analogy will help explain the relationship between consciousness, genetics and human physiology. Very Large Array telescopes consist of multiple radio frequency telescopes placed miles apart which are networked together. They act as a single massive telescope which can tune into or ‘see’ into the radiation spectrum of objects in the distant deep Cosmos. Crucially each member telescope of the array must work in an identical fashion to all the other telescopes.

In this analogy our network of trillions of cells with identical genetic material is like an array. Individual cells are receivers of consciousness. When networked together they can tune into universal consciousness. In human physiology, this intercellular network supports a single identity or personality.

Consciousness supported by the cellular network has two sides: active and non-active, expressed and silent, object referral and self referral. The functioning side of the consciousness network includes perceptions, decisions, reflections and actions, but all of these rely on their connection with the silent non-active phase of universal consciousness, just as physical laws which function in the universe rely on their connection with the silent non-active unified level of natural law, sometimes referred to as the ground state of natural law. This universal level of consciousness exists independent of physiology, but is able to be experienced and expressed in individual life through the physiology.

In the waking consciousness of daily life, the non-active phase of consciousness is overshadowed by constant activity, perception and thinking. The purpose of traditional deep meditation is to clarify this situation, settling the mind to the extent that a clear relationship with universal consciousness is established uncluttered by activity. This is accompanied by deep metabolic rest and coherent brain functioning. A state of transcendence develops as the WHOLE physiology settles to its ground state. Research supporting the HOLISTIC nature of the effect of deep meditation is discussed in our article “New Studies Further Confirm Adverse Effects of Covid Vaccines. Can These Be Reversed, if So How?“. Ultimately, with regular practice a clear connection with universal consciousness is maintained along with activity. These points are discussed and referenced in our paper Evolution, Genetics, Physics, and Consciousness available for download.

Many people believe that consciousness is located in specific areas of the brain. It is true that some specific expressed functions of consciousness are carried out by specific areas and structures contained in the neural network of the brain, but the ground state of consciousness is connected to the physiology as a WHOLE. A first person report by Bill Lumley reprinted by the Daily Mail recounts his experience of being fully conscious while on life support and having been diagnosed as brain dead. The functioning aspect of his brain was quiescent, but his silent witness value of consciousness was fully awake.

In this context it is clear that there are two distinct phases of operation in the human physiological network. Inter-cellular connections outside the cell membrane support the connective network functions through biomolecular, electric and chemical media for example. The receiver functions are contained inside the cell membrane where our DNA and its genetic expressions are housed. Any intervention which edits or alters activity inside the cell membrane, as both viral infections and mRNA vaccines do, can disrupt our capacity to tune into universal consciousness. If the disruption involves a sufficiently large number of cells as is the case with severe infections and COVID-19 vaccines, research shows that the clarity of consciousness along with its functions can be degraded even leading eventually to the onset of dementia.

So far, explanations of the broad spectrum of adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines have focused on the factors external to the cell membrane such as the effect of the spike protein. It may be that the more powerful explanation lies in the disruption of the internal genetic functioning of cells which disrupts our connection with universal law and universal consciousness.

Colleagues working in Holland developed a reference work on adverse effects of modern medical interventions which interact with molecular mechanisms outside the cell membrane. They documented 19,136 scientific review articles published in scientific journals between 2000 and 2005 on 44,532 subjects comprising more than 82,000 pages of research abstracts alone. When modern medicine adopted and even mandated mass mRNA vaccination during the pandemic they crossed a red line and began interfering with the command and control mechanisms of the WHOLE physiology. The broad spectrum hazards of genetic interventions dwarf those of prior medical interventions in both scope and seriousness. They are more long lasting and potentially fatal and they cannot be recalled using any known conventional medical approaches.

Collective effects of consciousness

The Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) radio telescope, comprises ten 25-meter dishes located from Hawaii in the west to the U.S. Virgin Islands in the east that constitutes the world’s largest dedicated, full-time astronomical instrument. Indian sage Maharishi Mahesh Yogi suggested in the seventies that the receiving and amplification of consciousness can be enhanced by large groups practising meditation together, a collective principle widely recognised in many historical cultural and religious traditions. The very wide base of published research supporting this phenomenon documenting reduced crime and conflict is discussed and fully referenced in my book Your DNA Diet. This opens the possibility of collective healing of the individual and society at large.

Healing the adverse effects of genetic interventions will require linking back to the source of life in universal law. Whether this is referred to as God’s Will or natural law doesn’t matter so much as the understanding that human life has a source, course and goal guided by the fundamental laws or eternal truths of the Cosmos. Reconnecting with these has always involved both our ancient relationship with the intelligence in plants and our relationship with universal consciousness—the self of all. If a new era of understanding and health is to dawn in human life, it must involve our source.

Last week we covered alarming official figures for chest pain among the under forties in New Zealand released under OIA. A ten fold increase which began before New Zealand had COVID-19 but after the mRNA vaccine rollout began.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share.

The story was picked up by the Australian media who pressed their state health authorities for data, and bingo the same alarming trend was uncovered in NSW and Queensland. Under pressure in a live interview with 2GB Sydney, NSW Health Minister Ryan Park said he had consulted at length with NSW Chief Health Officer Dr. Kerry Chant and as a result admitted to the interviewer “without a doubt some people presented to our ED’s with chest pain after the vaccination”. The Minister then tried to blame COVID-19 infection as the greater threat, but had to backtrack when the interviewer pointed out the chest pain trend in Australia also began before COVID-19 took hold as it did here in New Zealand.

Back here in New Zealand we have been subject to a week long public silence on the figures. From our correspondence bag, I know many of you have joined us in contacting MPs, health officials, and the media to ask for comment, but so far silence, again leaving the vaccine injured out in the cold. Watch this page for updates, they are coming.

Similar scenarios are being played out around the world. The UK Daily Mail leads with “Alarming rise of ‘super-fit’ slim young people suffering heart attacks“. It reports a 66% rise in heart attacks in the USA among people aged 18-44 since the pandemic began. It says:

“One in five heart attack patients are now younger than 40”

The article reports interviews with doctors who casually and conveniently blame the sudden acceleration in heart problems almost exclusively on COVID-19 infection, whilst mRNA COVID-19 vaccination cardiac side effects are wrongly dismissed as rare and non serious. The article states misleadingly:

“Once in the body, the Covid virus can cause the heart to become inflamed, a condition known as myocarditis, leading to damage that makes it harder to pump blood around the body. Over time, in extreme cases, this can damage the organ to the point it becomes too weak to adequately pump enough blood to the rest of your body, causing heart failure.”

After the reveal of the pre-COVID-19 but post-vaccine New Zealand chest pain figures and other recently published studies, the prevalent misconception being promoted by health authorities, governments and the media that COVID-19 infection is the ultimate cause of the cardiac problems and sudden deaths among the youth needs to be firmly corrected. A study of 820,000 UK adolescents entitled “Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents” which compared health outcomes for vaccinated with the unvaccinated found zero cases of myopericarditis among the unvaccinated group who suffered COVID-19 infection. In other words, cases of myopericarditis occurred exclusively among those who had received a Pfizer mRNA vaccine.

The tsunami of illness among working age people comes with a massive economic cost. An article in the UK Telegraph headlines “How Britain’s sickness crisis blew a £15bn hole in the economy”. What’s more, just like the chest pain crisis in New Zealand, the trend is accelerating into 2024.

The government is treating the trend as a plague of worklessness. A newly appointed government tsar, himself recovering from a recent heart attack, urges people to get back on their feet. It fails to ask what might be causing ill health. It shouldn’t be too difficult to interpret the timeline of the above graph. Yet government misdirection and denial are typical responses. Nor are governments unafraid to simply hide the alarming figures. Here in New Zealand, Stats NZ has responded to concern about rising excess deaths by stopping publication of weekly mortality figures, and that is just one example. 2019 is the last year figures for cancer incidence in NZ were published by the Cancer Control Agency. Access to cardiac hospitalisation and incidence data past 2020 is restricted by Health NZ.

The OIA chest pain statistics for the under 40s was a rare look behind a closed door. Other statistics pointing in exactly the same direction include the last available Medsafe Covid Safety Report #46 dated November 2022 which records a cumulative 13,000 reports of chest pain following COVID-19 vaccination, a number which Medsafe itself admits is grossly under reported.

Another corroborating statistic is the leaked Wellington Region data showing an 83% increase in cardiac hospital admissions. For obvious reasons, we can’t reveal our source for this.

You have to ask yourself why 11,000 Health NZ medical staff and contractors sought and received Covid vaccine exemptions and why ACC staff point blank refused to be subject to any vaccine mandate. They knew first hand what was happening.

There is no prior history of this fit under 40 age group reporting to EDs pre-pandemic in tens of thousands. Just think, pre-pandemic someone under forty dying suddenly in the USA with a supposed cardiac condition was so rare, that it was standard practice for the police to require a toxicology report to check that they hadn’t been poisoned. How times have changed.

You can imagine that in a climate of denial and restriction, it has been very hard for the New Zealand public to realise the extent of the problem and the risks they face. One of our subscribers forwarded our recent email on the myocarditis crisis, which referenced a just-released official Medsafe report, to a friend they believed might be open to listen. The reply came back “I’m afraid I won’t read anything from this guy – he’s a well-known spreader of misinformation”. I wonder what the friend would say if they realised they had just refused to hear about the conclusions of a damning government report? A report that our mainstream media has failed to cover. I wonder what they would say if they knew that unlike the government we reference published studies in all of our public missives.

Fortunately, there is some help on the way from public spirited journalism. The independent Centrist reports they supported the successful defamation battle of Chantelle Baker against the New Zealand Herald and the often quoted Kate Hannah of the Disinformation Project, which was set up and funded by the Prime Minister’s Department. Kate Hannah had labelled Baker part of the “NZ Disinformation Dozen” and called her a “useful idiot”. According to the Centrist, the settlement is tantamount to “an admission that Kate Hannah is not an expert whose opinion is above defamation laws”. We note the settlement also brings the Prime Minister’s Department into grave disrepute.

I expect the damning verdict will escape attention from mainstream media. This just goes to show how far the government has succeeded in conditioning the public to close their minds. As a result, our media is full of stories of family tragedies without connecting the dots. Those raising questions from within the medical profession have been silenced, stood down and in a number cases struck off, creating a climate of fear.

We wonder how much further the government plans to proceed along this path? It seems determined to hold its course, continuing to approve and promote novel biotech medicines and mRNA vaccines despite alarming published evidence building up in reputable journals documenting the harms. We have summarised and referenced these papers again and again. Letters and emails to government ministers, MPs and health authorities remain ignored and largely unanswered. The government is now determined to press ahead with biotechnology deregulation, extending lax public health oversight to include unlabelled novel GM foods.

There are three types of leaders. The first and best are those who surround themselves with wise and learned counsellors, who listen to both sides of an argument and then decide on a course of action having taken into account fact, tradition, culture, morality and the welfare of their followers. The second are those who have a clique of like-minded counsellors, who make a pretence of having considered the arguments and parade their piety. The third type is the worst. They decide on a course of action of their own choice that accords with their personal goals and ideology without regard to the needs of time or place, the facts on the ground, or the opinion of others. They pursue their policies whether it does harm or good. It is not possible to persuade, negotiate with or influence such leaders with common sense. Our only recourse is the ballet box and that too offers only poor and manipulated choices.

Especially during the pandemic, governments around the world have adopted the position that they are in charge of dictating technological conformity. This extends from our food choices to what type of car we are allowed to purchase. Technology rules our lives and dogs our heels. The AI in our television listens in on our living room conversations and maps out our next purchase and our next drug. It rewrites the past for us, distorts the present and lays out a uniform future of ill health, mediocrity and drudgery. The pharmaceutical industry, whose tentacles, courtesy of Prime Minister Luxon and Judith Collins, will now extend into our pantry cupboard and onto our dining room table, has played a leading role in promoting and exploiting this trend which fully accords with the third type of leadership.

We are now reaping the ill harvest of this madness. Enough is enough. Shout it from the rooftops. People young and old are being poisoned by novel biotechnology experimentation protected from any scrutiny or accountability. This has to stop without delay.

The extraordinary New Zealand data of chest pain and cardiac incidence among the under forties, which has increased tenfold and remains high right up to the present, has provoked many questions and comments to our email inbox. Ranging from ‘how could the authorities let this happen’ to the ridiculous ‘the OIA doesn’t exist’ and everything in between. Making sense of the scale of the disaster is hard, and facing up to the failure and duplicity of those charged with protecting our health is even more perplexing.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

The OIA data for chest pain and cardiac events is not an isolated statistic. Medsafe have just released the results of a follow up survey of 298 NZ patients who received a clinical diagnosis of mRNA vaccine induced myopericarditis at least 90 days prior to filling in the survey. This survey was conducted two years ago. Inexplicably, Medsafe have waited until now to release the results. Contrary to earlier advice given to people experiencing symptoms of myocarditis that the final outcome would be mild and self-limiting, the survey revealed persistent serious problems beyond 90 days which had not been resolved.

“The median age was 36.5 years. 62% were male…. Chest pain was the most frequently reported physical symptom, experienced by 287 (96.3%) participants, followed by fatigue (256; 85.9%), shortness of breath (251; 84.2%), palpitations (234; 78.5%), and dizziness (189; 63.4%).. Twenty-two (7.4%) participants reported fainting.”

Representative survey responses to a range of open-ended questions about work, family life, treatment, follow up, etc included the following:

“Tried to exercise again and pericarditis symptoms returned.”

“Chest pain is extreme… not being able to walk without a cane.”

“This experience has caused anxiety and depression.”

“Before I was diagnosed, I was a full-time worker and into [sporting activity], since I got it, I can’t work at all or do any exercise.”

“Not being able to take care of my children is just awful. I can’t even kick a ball with my sons anymore.”

“I was initially told a number of times in ED that I was having anxiety attacks. I felt like no one was listening to me which made it even harder.”

“Was anxious about having the booster and I was fobbed off. I am not an ‘anti-vaxxer’. Doctors need to listen and be more empathetic.”

“Disappointed with lack of after care. Absolutely no specialist follow-up. Very disappointing.”

“Utter frustration that I had to go privately to get any help. Was told it would take one year to get any cardiac test. I would still be waiting for a diagnosis. I had to go privately.”

“To hear… myopericarditis repeatedly being reported as a mild consequence of vaccination was a huge insult and should immediately stop. This is not a mild sequela for many. This is a profound life changing and devastating event.”

“ACC – although accepting my vaccine injury treatment injury claim – decided seven days was sufficient time to recover [from it]… it took… nearly 8 months after the claim, for full cover to be approved.”

The Key Learnings section of the report admits there were deficiencies in:

• The vaccine information given to the public.
• Reporting systems for adverse reactions.
• Knowledge about possible adverse reactions.
• Keeping up to date with the implications of clinical publishing

The net effect was to create a deficient clinical and informational response to the tens of thousands of individuals reporting to GPs and emergency departments with chest pain. As a result, myopericarditis has been greatly under diagnosed or a diagnosis and clinical response has been delayed, even in some cases for years.

This is still continuing. The New Zealand Herald leads this morning with an article “Auckland man waited in Middlemore Hospital A&E in seven-hour ordeal”. A 39 year old man reported with chest pains. He was triaged and x-rayed within 35 minutes, but then waited 7 hours to see a doctor. During this time, he sat and sometimes had to stand along with hundreds of patients in the waiting room. He witnessed people sleeping on the floor, others walking out with medical tubes attached to their arm and a bleeding pregnant woman who sat on a hard chair for five hours before being seen.

The article doesn’t inform the public that the man was just one out of well over 30,000 individuals who will report to Accident and Emergency with chest pains this year, compared to just 2,000 pre-pandemic. It doesn’t tell us whether this was his first visit. It doesn’t tell us what the outcome was, whether he was referred to a cardiologist with a wait time of over a year. In other words, it leaves the public poorly informed. Despite the official data that has just come to light, it fails to correct the misleading information about vaccine-induced myopericarditis and chest pain incidence that the paper has been dutifully relaying to the public at the behest of the government and the health service for the last few years.

It doesn’t tell the public that if the man eventually secures an appointment to see a cardiologist, he will probably be asked if he is COVID-19 vaccinated and then confidentially and quietly advised to never have another shot. In contrast, while he is waiting for the appointment, he might receive numerous messages from the free-spending PR department of Health New Zealand via TV or text advising him to get another mRNA COVID-19 booster.

All because, as the Medsafe report concludes, Health New Zealand and the government are suffering from a clinical information deficit that they have failed to correct, along with an irrational faith in a so-called vaccine that doesn’t prevent disease, but rather causes it.

I don’t want to sound too harsh, but now we are aware of the astounding figures Health New Zealand has been sitting on and hiding from the public for the last few years, we have to ask serious questions about the probity of the management. They are supposed to protect and promote public health. Health New Zealand has become a medical system out of sync with reality along with a staff stretched beyond elastic limits. In other words, its left hand doesn’t know what its injured right hand is doing.

In the comments section of the Medsafe report, there were people who said they felt isolated and too socially embarrassed to even speak to their GP in case they were labelled as an anti-vaxxer and became a complete social pariah. It is easy to forget how much effort and money the government pouted into labelling the unvaccinated. They became antisocial, extremist and anti-science. They were accused of seeking to undermine democracy and overthrow the government. The government funded documentary Web of Chaos aired twice on prime time TV and remains On Demand. It complained about so-called disinformation over images of nuclear bombs exploding and Hitler making speeches.

We now know that current Health Minister Shane Reti’s plans to fix Health New Zealand by targeting reduced wait times and Science and Technology Minister Judith Collins plans to deregulate biotechnology experimentation and do away with GM food labelling, are straight out of Alice in Wonderland. Those asking questions about mRNA vaccine safety, mandates and died suddenly were right all along. The longer a public mea culpa and a stop to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination rollout is delayed, the further Health New Zealand, the media and the government are falling down their own rabbit hole which poses a very serious danger to public health and stability.

Vaccine injury and the serious long term adverse health prospects

Today, we report two new sources of alarming information about COVID-19 vaccine injury. One from Health New Zealand data and the other from the New Zealand health insurance industry. We ask how the government could have either missed these or deliberately ignored them. We then go on to discuss network theory and physiology. We will show how mRNA vaccines are able to have extensive and long lasting effects.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share.

Health New Zealand Emergency Department data

An OIA (freedom of information) request to Health New Zealand asked for “The number of people under the age of 40 presenting to Emergency Departments (A&E) throughout New Zealand hospitals with Chest Pain or Heart Issues by year?” The Health New Zealand answer (OIA reference: HNZ00061156) contains shattering information:

Year | Number presenting to Emergency Departments with chest pain

2019  2219

2020  4406

2021 13063

2022 21416

2023 20005

2024 (to June) 14639

The definition of chest pain for the purposes of this data includes right sided chest pain, chest wall pain, chest pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, chest pain on breathing, acute chest pain, chest pain on exertion, assessment of chest pain, anterior chest wall pain, atypical chest pain, history of chest pain, costal margin chest pain, non-cardiac chest pain, cardiac chest pain, dull chest pain, left sided chest pain, central chest pain, and ischaemic chest pain.

For the benefit of our overseas readers, these figures need to be read in the context of COVID-19 incidence in New Zealand. Because of border closures, quarantine, and lockdowns, New Zealand had close to zero Covid cases until February 2022. In contrast, Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccination became available in February 2021 for older people and those at risk. General availability for those under 40 years started towards mid 2021. Legislation making COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compulsory for those in various state employment sectors (vaccine mandates) was enacted in November 2021. The mandates were also adopted by the vast majority of private employers.

With this timeline in mind, the close association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and chest pain and/or heart disease among younger people becomes very clear. The surge in Emergency Department chest pain admissions began well before the COVID-19 infection took hold in New Zealand but immediately after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination programme began. The incidence of chest pain and heart disease took off in 2021 as more of the age group were vaccinated. Nor do the figures suggest a strong independent effect of lockdowns on chest pain and cardiac health.

Whilst the OIA figures are only by year and for the under 40s, 2021 official weekly figures for vaccination and mortality for all age groups combined, that we reported at the time, show a very close association. All cause death rates rose in tandem with mRNA vaccination.

The OIA figures suggest approximately a ten fold increase in chest pain and/or cardiac events among those under 40 probably associated with the administration of mRNA vaccines. Moreover the figures to June 2024 indicate the trend is still continuing.

These alarming figures are not marginal. They stand up and slap you in the face. They have been in the possession of Health New Zealand from the outset, but the public has heard nothing about them from official sources. Health New Zealand is still offering mRNA vaccines and telling the public the jabs are safe and effective. The serious implications are obvious. As we have been asking repeatedly, the government must first pause mRNA vaccinations and then publish the health outcomes of the last few years by date, age, vaccination status, and disease category. Only then can the longer term effect of the mRNA vaccines be known in detail. Instead, the government is not just hiding the figures and continuing to promote the mRNA vaccines, but also prosecuting a whistle blower who leaked mortality data.

• How many parents have taken their children in for COVID-19 mRNA vaccination relying on the safe and effective narrative of Health New Zealand and the government when all along Health New Zealand was sitting on these truly alarming figures?
• How many young adults have casually accepted COVID-19 vaccination, unaware that those offering them knew they could be very dangerous?
• How many working age Kiwis were coerced after November 2021 into taking the jab on pain of losing their job, profession and home?
• How many New Zealanders are still suffering the devastating adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine injury years later?

All this happened when Health New Zealand should have realised, or possibly did know very well, what was going on from their own data and from overseas sources early in 2021. When finally on 15 December 2021 Health New Zealand wrote privately to District Health Boards admitting that mRNA vaccines could cause myocarditis, they said the incidence was as few as 3 cases in 100,000 vaccinations. Their own data, as reported above, told a completely different story.

If these were all single individuals, the OIA figures would show that in the under 40 age group in New Zealand in 2021 1 out of every 130 individuals reported to an Emergency Department with chest pain or cardiac events. In fact, individuals with more serious cases would have been presenting multiple times, therefore this ratio will be higher, but not by orders of magnitude.

The majority were apparently sent home with ibuprofen and told to stop worrying (???). They were not made aware that overseas studies indicated their symptoms could be the start of long term illness and vulnerability to cardiac issues, as we reported in our March 2022 article “Study Finds Persistent Heart Abnormalities Among Child Vaccine Recipients”.

In 2022, chest pain incidence increased by a further 64% among the under 40s to a total of over 20,000 cases and continued at that level in 2023. These are not all the same people week after week and year after year, suggesting the long term rate of incidence of chest pain requiring a visit to an Emergency Department is staggeringly high.

The 15th December 2021 letter was signed by Ashley Bloomfield, New Zealand Director General of Health now honoured as Sir Ashley Bloomfield and currently directing the global pandemic response plan at WHO (World Health Organisation). The letter was also signed by Dr Andrew Connolly, Chief Medical Officer, Dr Juliet Rumball-Smith, GM Clinical Quality & Safety COVID-19 Vaccine & Immunisation Programme, and by Astrid Koornneef, Director, National Immunisation Programme. From the above OIA, it is clear that these people carry the heavy responsibility of failing to investigate the extent of vaccine injury, misinforming the public, GPs, and the DHBs, and endangering public health.

In addition to this, there has been a persistent public narrative that the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccination are limited and generally mild. This is a false narrative. It is counterfactual to the known pre-pandemic ten year 25% mortality risk of acute myocarditis. In fact, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination poses significant cardiac mortality risks. A study conducted in Spain and just published by the prestigious journal Vaccine entitled “Association of SARS-CoV-2 immunoserology and vaccination status with myocardial infarction severity and outcome” concluded:

“The combination of Covid vaccination and natural SARS-CoV2 infection was associated with the development of severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock in patients with myocardial Infarction, possibly related to an increased serological response.”

The researchers examined outcomes from 950 heart attack patients from March 2020 through March 2023 in a Madrid hospital. They found COVID-19 vaccinated and previously COVID-19 infected patients had an over 50 percent higher risk of death or heart failure than unvaccinated people who had also been previously infected – and a 90 percent higher risk than those who were unvaccinated and previously uninfected.

These researchers in Spain simply did what we have been asking our government to do for four years. Monitor the health outcomes of patients, compare the data for the vaccinated with the unvaccinated and analyse the results. Given our alarming increase in Emergency Department stats, why would our government omit to do this?

The Spanish study goes a long way to explaining why there is the persistently high rate of Emergency Department admissions with chest pain and heart failure up to the present day as the OIA data shows. In other words, cardiac adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination are not necessarily mild and often do not go away over time. In fact, the adverse cardiac effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination can be exacerbated by a subsequent COVID-19 infection. Moreover, as we have been reporting, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination also raises igG4 antibody levels which leaves the COVID-19 vaccinated more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, a process known as immune imprinting. In other words, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination triggers a form of cardiac double jeopardy.

Alarm bells sounding among private health insurers

Our second source of information has been passed on to the Hatchard Report from within the New Zealand Private Health Insurance industry. Around 36% of the New Zealand population are covered by some form of private health insurance. Among these there are about 920,000 working adults (up to 65 years). According to our source, the incidence of heart disease and cancer has accelerated to record highs in the years since 2020. However the most concerning trend for our health insurance industry involves another condition.

Some health insurance policies include income protection coverage for working adults should they become sick and unable to work. In the event of an illness, the insured’s income will be covered if they are absent from work as a result. For the majority of illnesses this coverage does not extend indefinitely because treatment for most conditions can get people feeling well enough to return to work. However there has been a recent significant and concerning blow out in the number of working adults suffering from cognitive decline—a condition sufficient to cause long term incapacity to work. Individual cases can cause insurers to continue to make income support payments over many years, costing millions of dollars per person.

To put it bluntly, this information may indicate there has been a significant increase in the incidence of early onset dementia among working age adults.

A year ago we published an article “The Long Read: Mental Health Issues are Multiplying. Why?“. We now have to ask if the alarming rises in anxiety, confusion and depression that we reported at the time have in some cases been developing into long term cognitive decline? The Health Insurance Industry is generally very secretive, the fact that they are now very concerned and seeking solutions says a lot about how serious this might be.

Networks and COVID-19 vaccine injury

The general public in New Zealand is so poorly informed on these issues, that people are still unable to connect the dots joining the well publicised crisis in our health system and COVID-19 vaccination. A lot of people accessing mainstream media sources are wondering why there are still people who have refused multiple COVID-19 vaccinations. To them it might seem incredible for anyone to suggest that a simple vaccination can cause widespread harm. In fact traditional vaccination has always been associated with adverse effects, some of them very serious. Moreover, reductions in the rate of serious infectious diseases like smallpox preceded vaccination programmes and was largely achieved via public hygiene measures. However, whatever you might think about that, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are not traditional vaccines in any sense.

How could a vaccination cause cancer, heart disease and dementia, that’s ridiculous right? Apparently, though, mRNA vaccines are at high rates. How? To answer this question in simple terms we refer to network theories of immunity. Networks are connected by a communication system and are usually designed to achieve a shared purpose. Every person has around 37 trillion cells that each contain identical DNA (with the exception of red blood cells which have no DNA to expedite unimpeded circulation). Our cells are networked through multiple means of communication, chemical, electrical, vibrational etc., yet we have a single personal and genetic identity and our cells share a single immune purpose to maintain health. Cells cooperate with one another to achieve this purpose. They do so through multiple trillions of communications and actions everyday which repair the integrity and uniformity of our DNA and repel foreign pathogens and toxins.

Cooperation is crucial to the functioning of networks. Individual units in a network must continue to work towards a shared purpose, otherwise a network could collapse. This is why botnets and viral software are so dangerous to computer networks. They repurpose the protocols of network members which can eventually spread and collapse the network viability. We have seen many cases of computer viruses over the last few years affecting the networks of various organisations and corporations.

mRNA vaccines cross the cell membrane (traditional vaccines do not) and repurpose their genetic functions. Thereby they affect the command and control functions of our physiology. In the case of COVID-19 vaccines, billions of cells are repurposed to produce the spike proteins found on the surface of the COVID-19 virus. The purpose of the mRNA vaccine is to encourage the immune system to develop a response against COVID-19 spike proteins and therefore COVID-19 infection. Almost everyone now realises these mRNA vaccines are very ineffective at protecting from repeated COVID-19 infections, but the accompanying risks are not generally well known. In simple terms:

• The spike protein produced in massive quantities following COVID-19 vaccination, sometimes for months, is now recognised as a cardio toxin.
• The billions of cells repurposed by mRNA vaccines are no longer able to properly perform their immune functions and their role in the immune network which includes fighting cancer and protecting from pathogens. Thus opening a door for a wide range of illnesses.
• Our higher mental functions rely on unique, exact and specific characteristics of genetic functions which are disrupted by COVID-19 vaccines. Thereby the potential for mental illness is increased.

In sum, our cell-based immune network no longer has a single purpose. Our internal physiological communication systems distribute the resulting imbalanced functions and proliferate health problems. It is as if our whole physiological network of genes, cells and organs has been invaded by a rogue agent. The network is fighting itself, as happens with autoimmune diseases. If the number and density of mRNA vaccine repurposed cells is sufficiently large our immune system can fail to clear up the mess. In this case, a wide variety of disease outcomes can result.

This has to stop now

This has not been a merely theoretical article. The Health New Zealand data and the other results and studies we have been reporting speak for themselves. The fact that Health New Zealand has not acknowledged the import of their own statistics is a huge failure of intelligence. It is all but unforgivable. Despite early warning signals, Health New Zealand has failed to take account of facts well known to biotechnology researchers and reported in the literature long before the pandemic began. Gene therapies, of which COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is a type, can have multiple physiological adverse effects including whole system instability and collapse.

Health New Zealand have hidden behind an unjustified fiction that COVID-19 vaccination can only be blamed for a very limited, often mild and treatable known set of adverse reactions. In other words, they have excluded reported serious health outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination from any causal investigation. They turned their heads and looked away. In fact the data we have reported above illustrates just how far they have misled the public. In reality, the public have become unknowing participants in a deadly game of Russian roulette.

It is so far past time to recognise past mRNA COVID-19 vaccine harm and the growing dangers ahead. Especially as multiple mRNA vaccines are under development and soon to be offered to the public. Our government is planning to deregulate biotechnology, rushing like a moth to the flame. This has to stop now.