The NY Times is heralding a new company called Mechanize formed in San Francisco to produce software with the ‘audacious’ (???) goal of replacing 50% of white collar jobs with AI within the next five years. They plan “to fully automate all jobs….including doctors, lawyers, architects, and childcare [aka mothers and parents???]”.
Let me first rush to reassure you this is not going to happen, because recent definitive research has found that AI is not actually very intelligent. Artificial Idiot might be a better term. A devastating study commissioned by Apple computers has found that AI suffers a complete accuracy collapse in the face of complex problems. The authors concluded that AI may be completely devoid of any reasoning ability that can be compared to that of humans. Leading AI critic Gary Marcus wrote on Substack “Anybody who thinks LLMs [the engines of AI models] are a direct route to the sort [of] AGI [artificial general intelligence] that could fundamentally transform society for the good is kidding themselves.”
It seems AI can’t even match the intelligence of the wild boar stalking around our property who has learnt to avoid traps, dogs and multiple hunters. The Apple study found that AI tends to prefer to waste time on trivial problems that are easy to solve and fails miserably when confronted with critical problems. The sort of white collar worker attributes all employers dread. If we do start relying on AI for white collar work we are going to rapidly find ourselves living in a world resembling Alice in Wonderland, or perhaps we are already there. Possibly planes will routinely fall out of the sky and ball point pens will clog up on their first use.
Our daily experience teaches us that life is a complex problem, one that we are working hard to solve every minute of the day. Rioters in Los Angeles have been burning self-driving cars, apparently the AI which controls these cars was unable to respond to the highly complex social problems involved. To sum it up, AI is rather simple minded and ill suited to life in general.
In fact the application of simplistic models to medicine has already led us to a world with serious problems resulting from interventions that are sold as solutions. A paper entitled “Evaluating Vaccine Effectiveness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Insights from Statistical and Machine Learning Methods“, has found that contrary to expectations, vaccinated individuals lost 40% more working days due to Covid infection than their unvaccinated counterparts (p<0.0001). But the vaccinated were not just taking a higher number of days off work, they were also dying in greater numbers as a study entitled Paradoxical increase in global COVID-19 deaths with vaccination coverage: World Health Organization estimates (2020–2023) published in April of this year concludes: “The Americas (39.8%) and Europe (34.1%) accounted for more than 70% of global COVID-19 deaths despite high vaccination”. Moreover Covid deaths increased when Covid vaccination began belatedly on continents like Africa.
These figures point to increasingly faulty modelling of the potential effects of medical interventions when compared to actual outcomes. A narrow focus on a highly simplified effect pathway of a medicine leads evaluators to ignore physiological and genetic complexity which is highly likely to lead to adverse effects.
Take so-called weight loss drugs like Wegovy, Mounjaro and Ozempic for example, that have been popularised by the Hollywood elite and clever campaigns from drug companies in alliance with the media. An article in New Scientist is entitled “GLP-1 drugs are only the start – the powerful drugs to expect next“. This outlines the widely touted claim that weight loss drugs are a gateway to health, potentially curing leading killers such as heart disease. The Guardian sums up the incredible claims in one startling paragraph:
“The benefits of being at a healthy weight are substantial, with one study published in January suggesting weight-loss jabs could reduce the risk of 42 diseases including heart disease, cancer, clotting disorders, Alzheimer’s, chronic kidney disease, addiction and a range of psychiatric conditions. There is early evidence that these benefits go beyond what might be expected due to the drugs’ metabolic effects.”
Phew!!! But these claims ignore the mounting evidence of harm. Known adverse effects include constipation and in extreme cases potentially fatal intestinal blockages, loss of vision including blindness, pancreatitis, nausea, stomach pain and gallbladder dysfunction. They also ignore the inevitable weight gain when the injections cease.
While the weight lost via GLP-1 drugs can bring about some health benefits, up to 40% of the weight lost includes a decrease in muscle mass and lessened bone density, along with a lowered resting metabolic rate. These are the symptoms of a condition associated with ageing known as sarcopenia — the gradual loss of muscle mass, strength, and function. In other words, weight loss drugs could be accelerating the aging process. Only longer term mortality studies will be able to assess the level of risk—studies that have not yet been undertaken. In time we may be viewing some rather prematurely aged Hollywood stars on the silver screen using walking canes to complete their action sequences and telling their lovers they are too tired to continue.
So much for the good then that RFK Jnr. has appointed all new US vaccine advisors after sacking the previous committee. Kennedy said the new members “have each committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations.” The health secretary added “All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense.” I don’t know what Kennedy thinks about AI, but I am truly grateful he did not appoint a short sighted computer to replace the committee, as some tech whizzes in kooky California are planning, instead trusting in common sense. I second that.
If you read the newspapers you may not know it, but biotechnology is going through a process of collapse.
According to authoritative pharmaceutical industry online Endpoints News:
“The opening months of 2025 have offered no respite to the chilly biotech market of the last few years, biotech correspondent Kyle LaHucik reported this week. Despite the comeback everybody seems to want, there’s been a steady drumbeat of restructurings, pipeline cuts, layoffs and short-lived pivots. Kyle highlighted iTeos Therapeutics, once a darling of the anti-TIGIT class of biotechs, as an embodiment of the current struggles. iTeos had a clinical failure and lost a partnership with GSK this spring. It’s now shut down.”
The picture is stark. Biotechnology is in a terminal existential crisis. According to Raymond James bankers who provided data to Endpoints, there were six strategic reviews launched in April alone, with 30 active strategic reviews as of May 4. These strategic reviews are being conducted because biotechnology research is not delivering viable products. According to Stifel bankers, at least 168 biotechs have negative enterprise value as of May 16. And the dreariness follows 90 total restructurings in 2024. Fewer than five new biotech companies have been floated so far this year, down from 16 last year.
Biotechnology is an industry built on an exclusively materialistic paradigm of life. In fact, as everyone experiences everyday, life involves a continuous interaction between consciousness and matter, mind and body, psychology and physiology, awareness and the environment. To pretend otherwise, to ignore consciousness as the prime mover of life, as myopic bioscientists continue to do so, is a fatal error and a scientific dead end.
As a result, biotechnology is an industry built on false advertising dreams and the same kind of financial thinking that leads millions of people, who are doomed to disappointment, to buy lottery tickets every week. Five years ago a door was opened which allowed failed Covid vaccine and treatment products onto the market without long term testing. This was not just ‘on the market’, it was forced on unwilling populations as a modern day exponential expansion of Mengele style medical research. The result has been a public health disaster, as we all now know. Except for some extreme dreamers who keep their faith and belief in a biotech future. Floundering in a sea of adverse events, they are trying to save their misguided and twisted paradigm of life by pretending success is just around the corner. Vinay Prasad, Trump’s head of the CBER which regulates biotechnology, has promised “to ‘rapidly’ push even small advances for rare disease drugs.”
Reality may now be catching up with this hopeful or is it hopeless kind of thinking, but unfortunately vaccines still enjoy protection from product liability or efficacy standards. Therefore the excessive claims of the industry and the harms that result cannot be judged in the courts. Nor do their deficiencies find any but the smallest echo in the media. There are powerful monetary, government and career incentives at work here. The billions made during the pandemic from fake cures is sufficient to drive to a frenzy those who seek to profit by controlling medical, political, scientific and financial narratives. Their twisted dreams extend to rebuilding the physiology of whole populations no matter the certainty of deadly risks, the sea of unknowns or the obvious and final impossibility of the whole enterprise.
The journal Nature headlined last week “Cancer-fighting immune cells could soon be engineered inside our bodies” Because CAR T-cell gene therapy for cancer sufferers is so expensive ($800,00 per shot), risky, difficult to administer, laborious and time consuming to make. Researchers are pushing the boundaries hoping to re-engineer the body’s own cells to produce novel cancer fighting capabilities using mRNA technology. What could possibly go wrong?
The terminology of biotechnology research is a ‘dead’ give away. An article in the Guardian headlines “‘Inverse vaccines’: the promise of a ‘holy grail’ treatment for autoimmune diseases“. Which describes the ‘hope’ or is it ‘hype’ of some researchers that the genetic suppression of parts of the immune system will cure a multitude of diseases. Really??? Suppressing the immune system will cure disease and there won’t be a downside??? Note the use of the word ‘promise’ and the reference to the myth of the ‘Holy Grail’ which brings to mind a fruitless search through the ages for something that may not exist, over which bloody battles were fought.
An article in the UK Telegraph entitled Mental health sick days soar by 5m in just a year should give us a heads up. “Staff took a record 20.5m days off because of mental health conditions including stress, anxiety and depression in 2024, according to the UK Office for National Statistics, up from 14.8m in 2023.” Consciousness is not divorced from our physiology as biotech proponents assume. Altering the fundamental genetic processes of a whole population can have unforeseen yet drastic mental health consequences. No worries for the culprits though, there is nothing currently in law to ensure that anyone is required to ask WHY? or HOW?
Despite the obvious need to investigate what is causing this massive shift in mental health outcomes, the doctrine of materialism protects those responsible from self doubt or any need to be restrained or judged. Currently at least 33 self-amplifying mRNA injection candidates are in development worldwide. Arcturus Therapeutics’ COVID-19 replicon injection (ARCT-154) has already been approved in: India (June 2022), Japan (November 2023) and the EU (February 2025). According to many researchers, self amplifying vaccines have the capability to automatically spread through populations.
“Spreading through populations” is music to the ears of military strategists doggedly preparing for the end of the world. As reported by Technocracy News “Last week, the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) put out a Request for Information (RFI) seeking information regarding “state-of-the-art capabilities in the simulation of disease outbreaks.” Including of course: “model lockdown, social distancing, vaccination & messaging strategies”. The RFI also asks participants “How are fatality rates and varying levels of population immunity (natural or vaccine-induced) incorporated into your simulations?” This obviously points to plans to use such failed strategies again on populations in the near future.
End of the world thinking seems to go hand in hand with the rise of mental ill health among the working population. The UK Telegraph headlines “How Britain’s biggest companies are preparing for a Third World War“. It reports that bosses want to ensure their companies can survive if ongoing conflicts ignite the global tinderbox—AKA a nuclear war. How people started to think global business will survive a nuclear war I can’t imagine. The acceptance of the unthinkable as an everyday problem of business in the modern world is almost a definition of the kind of insanity that has engulfed collective consciousness since 2020.
If you are feeling overwhelmed as I often am, take comfort from an article in the journal Risk Analysis entitled “Island refuges for surviving nuclear winter and other abrupt sunlight-reducing catastrophes“. It rates New Zealand and Australia as the places best placed to be able to weather a global catastrophe such as the mass crop failures following a nuclear war or a gigantic volcanic eruption. A caution though, we might have to start making 100% of our own stuff.
However you read current geopolitical trends and the trail of catastrophe that has dogged biotechnology experimentation, it is clear we are heading for a global transformation. Whether this is a life changing disaster or a positive phase transition is entirely up to us. By that I mean we have the power in our own consciousness to transform individual and collective life. For a forest to be green the trees have to be green. For peace to reign, individuals have to be at peace. For collective intelligence to dawn, individuals have to be alert. For the supermarkets to sell healthy food, we have to reassign our buying power at the till by making individual healthy food choices. This has to be a mass movement. All mass movements begin with individuals who are unafraid and unembarrassed to speak and act the truth. Consciousness is the greatest power in the world. It is time to rediscover that power inside ourselves.
There is little doubt that the world is in the process of transformation. Clearly a lot has to change.
All over the world significant numbers of people in every country are fed up with their governments and the institutions which have been guiding national life. This process accelerated during the pandemic as it became clear that a great deal was being hidden or distorted to facilitate public compliance. Now there is a process of public awakening slowly gaining momentum, but the actual course and final outcome of this restorative process remains hidden in the future, subject to uncertain events.
The pace of life and the density of information in every field of knowledge and endeavour has been accelerating exponentially. This has become so overwhelming that politicians and administrators everywhere have put up barriers to exclude broad-based information sources from their deliberations. Instead relying on their preferred advisors, economic principles, corporate lobbyists, political ideologies and crucially AI. As a result, the idea that the world can be transformed by presenting information to those in power has become a largely forlorn hope. We need new strategies.
To manage the explosion of information, technocrats are touting artificial intelligence, but computers are unaware, unable to experience in the way we do. They can only sample and summarise large amounts of information from the past. Therefore AI is destined to rehash all the failures of the past. Repeating the same mistakes that awakening populations are rejecting the world over.
Worse still, governments have started to use AI to distance themselves from public opinion. An article in Stuff is entitled “ACT leader David Seymour suggested ‘bots’ drove ‘fake submissions’ against his Regulatory Standards Bill“. Seymour was complaining because a public consultation received 23,000 submissions, 88% of which were opposed. Seymour has no evidence to support his accusation, he should have realised that, especially since the pandemic, the public is becoming more organised and alert to oppose government overreach. The really revealing part of the article is as follows: The Ministry for Regulation deputy chief executive of policy Andrew Royle admitted the ministry used AI to analyse the submissions received, saying:
“Its process included a “qualitative” analysis of about 1000 individual submissions. Group submissions and submissions over 10,000 words were read separately. The rest were summarised using AI.”
In other words, your submission to the government was very unlikely to be read by a human unless it exceeded 10,000 words, and this is just the beginning of the use of AI to control our lives and edit public narratives.
In parallel with this, our food sources and health systems are being edited and transformed through biotechnology experimentation and manufacturing. This is proceeding on a vast scale affecting the whole world’s population. It is happening not just without adequate safety testing, but despite evidence available to those controlling the process that gene editing is not just risky, but actually harming public health. Much of this is happening under the radar with the result that the public is not just uninformed, they are being misinformed and misled.
There are seeds of doubt emerging—Biotechnology is a ticking time bomb
Your local newspapers are probably not carrying articles like this one published May 27 by Barrons Investment Updates entitled “Gene Therapy Death Worsens Picture for an Already Troubled Field” which reports the death from treatment complications of a patient enrolled in a trial of gene therapy which was meant “to treat a rare genetic condition called Danon Disease, which weakens the heart muscle and generally kills male patients in early adulthood.” The trial has been suspended and the share price of the company involved, Rocket Pharmaceuticals of New Jersey, has fallen by 63%.
As the article explains, this is not an isolated case within the biotech industry. Another recent death occurred in March, when a patient on Sarepta Therapeutics’ Elevidys, an approved gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, died of liver failure. The process of gene therapy alters genetic sequences which triggers an immune response designed to protect us by eliminating invasive foreign DNA. As a result, gene therapy recipients inevitably face a lifetime of immunosuppressant drugs which affect their health, limit their lifespan and require hugely expensive ongoing monitoring and treatment. Thus gene therapy has inherent contradictions. Not only will gene therapy never be able to fulfil its exaggerated promises, but it will have an open ended negative affect on public health outcomes, as happened during the pandemic
The Barrons article concluded, “gene therapies have become largely unattractive to investors, who are worried about unexpected safety risks and commercialisation challenges”. In fact, the procedures are so costly, not just in terms of money but also in terms of the required number of highly trained medical personnel and sophisticated equipment for each patient and the amount of procedural individualisation involved, that it is inconceivable for any health system to fund them. The article reports that as a result medical biotech companies are finding it hard to enrol patients.
However our politicians remain largely isolated from the harsh realities and risks of biotechnology. Instead, subject to lobbying from corporate interests and researchers dependent on government grants, they are deregulating biotechnology. If biotechnology experimentation is not stopped, inevitably within a short timescale there will be another outbreak of a novel man made illness that causes a precipitous decline in mental and physical health on a global scale.
The extraordinary refusal to acknowledge the dangers of biotechnology needs to be met head on. An article in the UK Telegraph entitled “It’s time for the truth. Here’s the Covid Paper they don’t want you to read” reports “Still the scientific establishment is refusing to take the lab leak hypothesis seriously, let alone investigate it.” It asks the scientific establishment: “There are over 20 million people dead, and you don’t want to know why?”
There are still chances for us to register our opinion on the Gene Technology Bill, for example by signing and sharing the “Petition of Lisa Er: Halt the Gene Technology Bill and set up a Commission of Inquiry.” It just takes a minute to sign, and we need more signatures. Go to:
To have even more impact ask for a meeting with your local MP.
But some words of caution are needed here, we are not involved in a logical argument. There is an almost fanatical and certainly reckless mentality associated with biotechnology experimentation. The industry constantly projects false messianic messaging of a bright biotech future promising long life, health and enhanced abilities, but there is no evidence for this in fact the opposite and the people pumping out the message are well aware of the lie. There is a disregard for public preferences, scientific caution and medical outcome data. Therefore it would be a mistake to believe that a compromise is possible with the biotech industry. It should be clear that very little meaningful dialogue is taking place. To move out of this danger zone, we need to take big steps. Little steps, meaningless discussions, compromise and delay only play into the hands of the biotech industry and ultimately spell disaster.
We need a giant leap forward
Over the last few weeks we have been reflecting: “What more can we do?”What can our proposed Hill Station College of Natural Law offer to dispel the head in the sand attitude of governments, bypass the biotech corporate juggernaut and open the eyes of gaslit populations?
Despite all the turmoil and polarisation in society, the sun rises every day anew, the seasons revolve one into another and the business of natural law continues unabated. The managing power involved is beyond our comprehension. A simple analogy will explain this.
Every day we are eating food. To digest this, our physiology makes trillions of decisions for us every second of the day, it guides physiological transformations which turn our meals into bones, muscle, blood, brains, organs and everything else which sustains and facilitates our life. Doing so, it maintains the enormously complex structural integrity of trillions of physiological components. Even the design of an eye for example is beyond our capacity to completely understand, reproduce or redesign. Now let us suppose we receive a 1000 piece jigsaw for our birthday, it will take us days to complete. Our body achieves millions of times more than this every millisecond. Cosmic law scales this up to inconceivable levels of organisation.
Despite this, the body cannot function properly without the input of our consciousness. We must make the right food choices, rest and exercise in time, while behaving sensibly and considerately. Natural law is intimately tied to our consciousness. Consciousness is the key to our relationship with nature. Gaining the support of natural law involves managing our consciousness. Consciousness is the essence of life, but what facet of consciousness? Our thoughts, feelings, ideas or dreams?
The home of the laws of nature is abstract, not obviously seen or heard, rather silent but all powerful. Our connection with the laws of nature can be strengthened in the silent depths of our consciousness. Communion with nature is not found in the endless sea of information, but rather in the abstract WHOLENESS of our inner consciousness. Holistic consciousness is the fulcrum point around which everything is balanced.
Therefore the first principle of the College of Natural Law is research in consciousness. Throughout the ages this has been the aim of the practice of meditation. The practice of meditation has nourished all cultural, intellectual and religious traditions. If you are new to the idea of meditation, it is not hard to learn, and the rewards can be immense for the individual and very powerful for society.
The massive effect of meditation on society is reported in my paper published in Psychology, Crime, and Law, 2:3, 1996. The research was completed originally in 1993 and presented by invitation as a keynote speech to the Annual Conference of the British Psychological Society on Crime, 1-3 March 1993, Harrogate, UK. The study provided additional clear and powerful evidence that crime in any major city can be reduced within a few weeks by a group practicing meditation. The powerful Box-Jenkins ARIMA impact assessment time series analysis was used to test the hypothesis that Merseyside crime rate was significantly reduced after what is known as the Maharishi Effect threshold was surpassed by a group of 140 collectively practicing transcendental deep meditation and 12,000 others in the city practising at home. My book Your DNA Diet explains the details and more about the benefits of meditation.
My follow up study of quality of life in Merseyside in the years subsequent to 1988 illustrates a remarkable cascade of positive trends and initiatives engulfing everyday life in the city of 1.5 million people. The following effects illustrate the infinite organising power inherent in our own consciousness:
1) LOWEST CRIME
Crime decreased by 60% relative to national trends (p<0.00006). Merseyside used to have the second highest crime rate in the nation, but became the lowest among the Metropolitan areas by 1993.
2) REDUCED INSURANCE PREMIUMS
The Association of British Insurers announced that insurance premiums in Merseyside will fall due to falling crime rates
3) SHORTEST HOSPITAL WAITING LIST
By 1990 hospital waiting lists in the Merseyside Health Authority Region had fallen to the lowest in the UK, with numbers of people having to wait for vital operations 60% less than in the other UK regions.
4) FREEDOM FROM YOUTH RIOTS
There was an absence of riots among Merseyside youth in the early 90’s in contrast to the riots in other English cities (including Luton, London, Oxford, Salford, Cardiff, and Bristol)
5) IMPROVED DRUG TREATMENT PROGRAMMES
Merseyside became the world pioneer of the ‘harm reduction movement’ for the treatment of drug addiction and had the lowest rate of HIV positive among UK cities.
6) ECONOMIC REVIVAL
Formerly declining, Merseyside became a model of economic revival. The national press reported it as one of the first cities in the UK to show signs of an end to the 89/92 recession.
7) REDUCED UNEMPLOYMENT
Unemployment rates in Merseyside and West Lancashire improved steadily relative to national trends after 1988 with a cumulative 60% drop in hard core unemployment.
8) INCREASED EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY
The UK Central Statistical Office rated Merseyside office staff as 20% more productive than their counterparts in London.
9) REDUCED STRIKES
Merseyside was once renowned for poor industrial relations, but by 1993 less than 1% of all working days lost in the UK were in Merseyside, despite the fact that almost 3% of the UK population live here.
10) PURIFICATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT
There was a complete purification and restructuring of the Liverpool City government which had previously been reported as one of the most extreme, inept, and corrupt among UK cities in the early 1980’s.
11) NEW BUILDING PROJECTS
Reconstruction and beautification of the inner city and the large old dock areas of the city got underway, which had been one of Britain’s worst slum areas in the late 1970’s.
12) IMPROVED HOUSING
Following years of decline in housing quality in the 70’s and early 80’s, the Liverpool Housing Action Trust became the largest in the country.
13) REVIVED ENTERTAINMENT AND TOURISM INDUSTRY
There was a revival in film production, theatre, and tourism which had been in serious decline in the late 70’s and early 80’s. Numbers of visitors to Merseyside were up by 53% to 29 million in 1990 compared to 1985.
14) SPORTING SUCCESS
Teams from the North West of England dominated in many sporting events in the early 1990’s.
15) BALANCED SEASONS & ADEQUATE RAINFALL
Merseyside escaped the droughts of 1988 to 1989. The North West was reported by the local press as the only area in the country to have adequate rainfall during this period.
16) INCREASED HARMONY & CO-OPERATION
A unique level of co-operation and harmony along with increased optimism and self-confidence was in evidence on Merseyside among public and private sector bodies. The Merseyside Partnership brought together over 40 organisations to promote progress in the region.
17) INCREASED HAPPINESS
A psychological study completed in the early 90’s at Liverpool University rated Merseyside pensioners as having 50% less depression than their counterparts in New York or London.
18) INCREASED ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS
In the first project of its kind in Europe, forty local organisations working together in the Estuary Project Group reduced the pollution load in the Mersey Estuary by 80%, enabling wildfowl numbers to increase by 60% and 35 species of fish to return.
19) HEALTHY LIFESTYLE
A unique experiment in the Wirral (a suburb of Merseyside) was described in the national press as ‘a rare piece of co-operation in the public sector’. Under the ‘Life Project’ initiative, inner city residents took more exercise, reduced use of prescription drugs, stopped smoking, cut back on drink, and changed their diet.
20) QUALITY OF LIFE
There were many articles in the local and national press analysing why all this optimism and positivity suddenly grew up in Merseyside. An article in the Daily Mail summed it up with the headline “Merseyside is my Heaven on Earth”, in the Daily Telegraph “A Good Place With Good People>” (June 13, 1995 p. 15), while an industrial development promotional advertisement in the Times of London (13 November 1991) trumpeted “Success After Success On Merseyside”.
Consciousness is at the centre of the Cosmos. This is an eternal verity found in every cultural and religious tradition. Christ said “the Kingdom of Heaven is within”. Krishna advised “Brahman [wholeness of consciousness] brings eternal freedom”. Buddha said, “Peace comes within, do not seek it without”.
Sufi’s say, “Meditation in God is my capital”.Einstein said “Man has infinite dimensions and finds God in his conscience.” Ralph Waldo Emerson said “Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string.” Seneca said“It is the power of the mind to be unconquerable. ”Marcus Aurelius said “You have power over your mind – not outside events. Realise this, and you will find strength.””
Despite this wisdom of the ages, the institutions of modern civilization (if that is the right term) have forgotten their founding principles. A great leap forward will result when research in consciousness becomes a priority in education. We are talking here about individual research in consciousness in the silent depths of self referral consciousness.
An article in the UK Telegraph this morning comments on the cover up of Biden’s cognitive decline saying:
“The ability to have some trustworthy sources in the world does matter – and will matter an awful lot more in the years to come. The media that helped cover up Biden’s condition should take a serious and critical look at themselves – even though it’s not clear that self-criticism is something of which they are remotely capable.”
Unfortunately untrustworthy sources are not limited to the media. A paper published in the Journal of Independent Medicine is entitled “Metacritique of Influential Studies Purporting COVID-19 Vaccine Successes: Part 1 – Watson et al” which concludes that the risks of Covid vaccines outweigh any perceived benefits, saying one highly cited study, relied upon by health services, falsely purported to show Covid vaccines saved 14 million lives:
“[The study included] the use of inaccurate estimates of effectiveness and safety due to inadequate counting windows; lack of recognition of waning effectiveness and eventual negative effectiveness; failure to account for confounding variables; exaggerated infection and case fatality rates; insufficient consideration of vaccine-related risks; and possible financial or political conflicts of interest.”
Search engines which employ AI are another source of unreliable and biased information, or rather misinformation. Last week I used Google to try to find out if the official March 2025 figures for New Zealand births and deaths had been published. Google AI overview told me:
“In March 2025, New Zealand saw a 7% increase in both live births and deaths compared to the same month in 2024. There was a natural decrease, with 584 more deaths than births. The average daily birth rate was 44, while the average daily death rate was 63.”
This answer is entirely false, in fact the New Zealand March figures had not been published and AI, ever eager to speak with authority, simply substituted the latest Slovenian data for that of New Zealand. The current standard AI search engines which provide one sentence answers to complex questions, which may be inaccurate simplifications or even false, are going to be a greater and greater curse on our education system as time goes by.
Believing in one thing to the exclusion of many, thinking that a single winner is the only person worthy of praise and reward, maintaining faith in something that doesn’t work or for which there is no evidence, posing as an expert on something about which you know little and pretending to certainty when there is doubt are all symptoms of a failure of intelligence. This arises when the knower pays attention to a PART of a problem but fails to appreciate the WHOLE picture.
Last week there were articles in papers around the world like one in the NY Times entitled “Baby Is Healed With World’s First Personalized Gene-Editing Treatment“. A nine month old baby known as KJ suffers from a rare genetic disorder which affects only one out of 1.3 million babies and is usually fatal. A customised gene editing intervention has saved his life for now. I don’t want to debate the merits of a life saving procedure which has so far cost many millions of dollars and has left the child dependent on the attentions of a team of doctors for the rest of his life, but I do take issue with Dr Peter Marks, the recently replaced director of the US FDA Centre for Biologics Evaluation and Research, who claims in the New England Journal of Medicine that the procedure will “transform healthcare”.
170 million Americans are suffering from one or more chronic diseases and a senior medic is suggesting that a risky gene therapy technique costing multi million dollars per person and requiring the lifetime attention of many doctors per patient will transform healthcare. Such a view is not just myopic, it combines blind faith, professional conceit, corporate greed and disregard of the glaringly obvious—gene editing will not solve the crisis in public health. On present evidence it is more likely to exacerbate it.
Far far more likely to transform healthcare is a story published in the UK Telegraph entitled “Eat three yogurts a day and other secrets from the woman who lived to 117. This reports the findings of a study of the exceptionally healthy gut biome of a supercentenarian published under the title “The Multiomics Blueprint of Extreme Human Lifespan. “Individuals with a greater variety and “balance” of microbes in their gut seem to have a lower risk of experiencing around 70 different chronic conditions, ranging from heart disease to Type 2 diabetes, as each type of bacteria or microbe does something different for the body.” The subject of the study who lived in California ate three yogurts a day, had a diet rich in fruits and vegetables, exercised regularly, cut down on alcohol and avoided toxic people.
If you are going to start eating yogurt, remember to avoid the processed flavoured and sweetened versions that crowd our supermarket shelves, research shows they are unhealthy. Organic plain yogurts are available and it is very easy to make your own fresh yogurt overnight at home—the healthiest option.
Complementing this, the American Journal of Preventive Medicine has published a study entitled “Premature Mortality Attributable to Ultraprocessed Food Consumption in 8 Countries“. This reports “Each 10% extra intake of UPF, such as bread, cakes and ready meals, increases someone’s risk of dying before they reach 75 by 3%”, according to research conducted in countries including the US and England. This adds to a growing body of evidence that UPFs are a fast track to an early death. For example, US research published last year in the BMJ found that people who consume the most UPFs have a 4% higher risk of death overall and a 9% greater risk of dying from something other than cancer or heart disease. It identified processed meat, sugar and ultra-processed breakfast foods, such as cereals, as the unhealthiest UPF products.
You might think that faced with such overwhelming evidence, government health experts would be rushing to warn the public about UPFs and incentivise healthy eating. In fact, governments the world over seem to be suffering from extreme myopia. A May 17 article in the UK Guardian is entitled “UK government dropped health push after lobbying by ultra-processed food firms“. This recounts the sorry tale of how planned government advice to supermarkets to prioritise promotion of fresh produce and drop promotions of junk food was abandoned after lobbying by the Food and Drink Federation (which represents corporations including Nestlé, Mondelēz, Coca-Cola, Mars and Unilever), repeatedly demanded the government ditch the healthy initiative.
These are the very same corporations who have been very busy substituting the natural ingredients in our traditional foods with genetically modified processing aids which contain harmful contaminated residues, as we reported in our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth“. As the 117 year old supercentenarian advised: ‘it is sensible to avoid toxic people’ and that goes for the glossy products of toxic corporations too. As consumers, we have more power than we realise. Time to STOP putting UPFs in our supermarket carts.
Our government is planning to deregulate biotechnology experimentation, putting millions of our taxpayer dollars into risky biotech research whose inevitable mistakes cannot be recalled or remediated, while proven measures to greatly improve public health which can be easily implemented with virtually no cost and managed at home go unnoticed, unheralded and unsupported. This is all the result of an education system which is failing the young who are the future leaders of society. Overwhelmed with an explosion of technology, people are gradually losing the capacity to think clearly and comprehensively. We are being bombarded with messaging tailored to influence our financial and political choices touting the very latest fad over simple, cheap, traditional tried and tested solutions. This war on common sense, nature and tradition is increasingly being designed by inherently dumb computers with the aim of subtly usurping our cognitive abilities.
We may not appreciate the scope and size of the effects, but reaching for a calculator, accepting the answer of a search engine, media source, or government pronouncement uncritically, copying and pasting without thinking, letting AI write it for you, and putting something in our mouth without reading the label are all rendering our intellect inactive and rusty. Use it or lose it.
Outer depends on inner.
There is a deeper kind of technology fully available to all of us—a technology of consciousness. Reflective time spent in deep meditation or prayer is a means to revive and refresh our intellect, quietly integrating experience into a broader knowledge framework, connecting the PART with the WHOLE. Modern education with its focus on exterior technology and superficial ideas is debasing this possibility. The kind of society and times we are living through are the end result of ignoring our inner life. History records the rise and fall of civilisations. Invariably, it is the wide availability of deep spiritual and intellectual insight that drives the rise, and ignorance and cruelty that drives the fall. We are sleepwalking into the end times of our civilisation, because we don’t understand life, yet life is the closest thing to us. If you haven’t yet begun a personal journey to fully discover inner life, it is time to begin. As Wordsworth put it so beautifully in Lines Written Above Tintern Abbey:
“….that blessed mood, In which the burthen of the mystery, In which the heavy and the weary weight Of all this unintelligible world, Is lightened:—that serene and blessed mood, In which the affections gently lead us on,— Until, the breath of this corporeal frame And even the motion of our human blood Almost suspended, we are laid asleep In body, and become a living soul: While with an eye made quiet by the power Of harmony, and the deep power of joy, We see into the life of things.”
It would be a mistake to think that such deep insight comes upon us solely by chance. We have control over our behaviour and food, we can mostly choose what experiences we expose ourselves to. Our consciousness is our own to manage. Christ said the Kingdom of Heaven is Within, echoing the wisdom of the ages. St Francis found peace in nature and reflection, we can do so also. The Bhagavad Gita promises the natural result of the regular practice of deep meditation, saying “He whose mind is unshaken in the midst of sorrows, who amongst pleasures is free from longing, from whom fear and anger have departed, he is said to be a sage of steady intellect”. This is not a mood cultivated through indifference but the natural result of repeated experience of the transcendental bliss that Wordsworth described as he sat above Tintern Abbey. It is time we looked within and taught the next generation to do likewise. The collective effect of meditation on society is transformative and beneficial in a way that is unmatched by any modern technology. You can find out more about transcendental meditation and its effects on individual and collective consciousness in my book Your DNA Diet available from Amazon as a Kindle.
Sometimes life is actually very simple and the answers are staring us in the face, but someone is being highly paid to make the wrong answer sound preferable. There was a long article on Monday in Stuff newspaper entitled “Given months to live, a businessman looked overseas for treatment. Now he’s cancer free“. It was the first of a series of five to be published this week. The article describes the use of CAR T-cell therapy to treat lymphatic cancer. The author makes a pathetic attempt to give us a balanced view of the pros and cons, but unfortunately there are glaring omissions which invalidate the suggestion that CAR T-cell therapy is a miracle cure for our rising cancer rates.
The managing director of an Auckland construction firm fell suddenly ill during a family holiday in the Philippines and eventually was diagnosed with lymphatic cancer including a tumour the size of a football. When chemotherapy at Auckland Hospital failed to work, he was able to pay to travel to China to receive CAR T-cell treatment at a total cost of $600,000, (about 50% less than the equivalent cost in Australia).
The therapy involved extracting his white blood cells and then genetically modifying them to detect and consequently attack the cancerous cells that were aggressively multiplying in his physiology. The modified cells were multiplied in a bioreactor and then injected back into his body. Overall the process took weeks to complete and the current result is a happy one, the patient is in remission and beginning to participate in a more normal life. This kind of result is described as ‘revolutionary’.
A second Stuff article contains the tragic tale of a New Zealand policeman who unfortunately arrived in China too late to stem the tide of his cancer and died. The whole point of the series of articles is “to look at what it will take to embed CAR T-cell therapy into New Zealand’s health system”. Apparently biotech researchers believe that Kiwi ingenuity will devise a cheaper and better system and they want the government to press the green light for funding in order to make their company “the Rocket Lab of immunotherapy”. AKA they want more money.
So what is the bigger picture?
COST: CAR T-cell treatment is currently limited to lymphatic cancers, however there are plans to expand its application to other types of blood cancers. Currently there are approximately 28,000 people in New Zealand diagnosed with cancer each year, around 1,100 (4%) of them with lymphoma. The New Zealand health service spends $800 million each year on cancer treatment. If all lymphoma cases were treated with CAR T-cell therapy, the additional cost would be at the very least $660 million, all of it spent on just 4% of cancer cases.
EFFECTIVENESS: Cancer returns within one year in about half of CAR T-cell patients necessitating further treatment. The five year survival rate for recipients is around 40%.
SIDE EFFECTS: These can be severe and even fatal involving an over reaction of the immune system. This is one reason why the treatment involves a whole team of attending specialists for each patient.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
The big question that the series of articles fails to address is the CAUSE of the rocketing number of cases of lymphoma. New Zealand has the highest rate of lymphoma in the world 12.5 cases per 100,000. The lowest rate in the world is Bhutan with 0.65 cases per 100,000, (about 20 fold less than New Zealand). So what does Bhutan have that we don’t?
Among these, the Bhutanese government actively supports organic agriculture. They have implemented a National Framework for Organic Farming since 2007 and have a goal of converting 100% of farms to organic production. The government’s commitment is evident in various initiatives, including the National Organic Flagship Programme and the designation of a National Centre for Organic Agriculture. The programme, worth Bhutanese Ngultrum (Nu.) 1 billion (or USD 12.8 million), is the largest fund in the world as a percentage of GDP dedicated to the organic sector. There have been challenges along the way, but the government is continuing to push ahead because the long term health and economic benefits are obvious.
New Zealand is going in the opposite direction.
The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) has announced its intention to raise the allowable glyphosate residue limits on food crops. There has been hardly a whisper in mainstream media, but make no mistake — this is a big deal. Read all about it at the No More Glyphosate website. The site goes into depth covering the serious health and agricultural issues. Public submissions (or more properly protests) close this Friday 16th May at 5pm and can be accessed through the site. A petition to parliament currently with 12,000 signatures is also linked.
The move to increase allowable glyphosate levels in our foods is inextricably tied to the deregulation of GM crops proposed by the Gene Technology Bill currently before parliament. Many of these crops will require increased use of Glyphosate, necessitating a raised residue limit.
We have a rapidly increasing incidence of cancers, our hospital system is overwhelmed, pesticide and herbicide use is suspected to be linked to cancer incidence and our government is planning to increase allowable residues. How mad is that? No, not mad, deliberately and criminally putting the commercial objectives of large multinational corporations ahead of public health.
When you are lost in the bush, what do you do? Try to retrace your steps, not madly plunge further ahead.
When a contractor fails to complete the work or deceives you, what do you do? Change contractors.
The current government appears determined to degrade our food supply. We are rapidly reaching a public health tipping point. There is no other sensible approach except wholesale rejection, determined opposition and a personal agenda to drastically improve our health habits.
The world is in crisis and in transition as I write. Nuclear armed powers India and Pakistan are at war, extending the conflict zone that has engulfed the Middle East. China is specifically threatening Taiwan with new weapons it has deployed successfully in Pakistan. The devastating effects of experimental biotechnology, whether in the form of engineered viruses or vaccines, have killed millions and adversely affected the lives of billions. Biotech battle lines have been set and the US administration has belatedly launched a rearguard action. Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jnr. has made key appointments at the FDA and at other agencies, who are insisting on scientific safety and efficacy testing standards for medicines and foods. mRNA technology is specifically under fire. Shares in biotech companies have tanked as a result. In an act of schizophrenia, mainstream media have largely abandoned caution and common sense in favour of attacks on Trump administration appointees, including RFK Jnr., whatever the validity of their statements and questions. As conflicts deepen, we have decided to go back to the most fundamental and ancient principles of natural law in an effort to describe solutions.
Natural law, physics and consciousness
There are innumerable laws of nature operating at every level of creation and at every time and place. At their foundation is the most powerful level of natural law, a field of supersymmetry, which is present everywhere with its whole potential available at every point. The laws of physics describe four fundamental forces Electromagnetism, Weak and Strong Nuclear forces and Gravity. These merge together at smaller time and distance scales, just like the four fingers of the hand which come together at the palm, eventually becoming completely unified at the Planck scale (10-33 cms and 10-43 secs).
The self referral character of the unified level of nature’s functioning identifies it as a field of universal consciousness which transcends time and space, yet supports it everywhere. This is further verified by the necessity of referencing an ‘observer’ to complete consistent physical theories of reality. Thus the material universe is irrevocably joined to our own consciousness. A connection we benefit from personally everyday as we perceive the world around us. Going deeper, the experience of the source of all the laws of nature is fully available to everyone in their own most settled state of consciousness which can be effortlessly achieved in deep meditation.
How do you know the truth?
The essence of natural law is the ‘Truth’—that which is: ‘Pure Consciousness’ or ‘Being’ with a capital ‘B’. When truth is respected and protected, in the management of society and in the daily life of everyone, society can prosper. Word of mouth can be trusted and the rule of national law can be just and fair.
An article in the NY Times headlines “A.I. Is Getting More Powerful, but Its Hallucinations Are Getting Worse”. It reports “A new wave of “reasoning” systems from companies like OpenAI is producing incorrect information more often. Even the companies don’t know why.” A.I. bots analyse enormous amounts of stored digital data from past internet postings.The NY Times continues: “AI Systems do not — and cannot — decide what is true and what is false. Sometimes, they just make stuff up, a phenomenon some A.I. researchers call hallucinations. On one test, the hallucination rates of newer A.I. systems were as high as 79 percent.” 8 out of 10 answers were wrong—a failing grade.
AI systems use mathematical probabilities to guess the best response, they are not using a strict set of rules defined by human engineers. So they make a certain number of mistakes. “Despite our best efforts, they will always hallucinate,” said Amr Awadallah, the chief executive of Vectara, a start-up that builds A.I. tools for businesses, and a former Google executive. “That will never go away.”In other words, even in critical applications AI systems can be completely unreliable.Nor will AI systems be able to innovate in the full sense of the word, they can simply rearrange things, or to use more understandable language, they can mimic and misrepresent the past and jumble up present reality. The truth remains hidden.
All computer hardware uses binary digital networks where logic gates can be either off or on and nothing in between. In contrast the human mind is not binary. It has sophisticated tools to know the truth. It experiences through five senses, it reasons with the intellect and can weigh the significance of the past. It perceives, infers, compares and crucially it listens and discusses with others who also have conscious minds.
According to the ancient science of reasoning known as Nyaya, there are sixteen points which can be used to test the validity of knowledge. In addition to the above, these include:
The capacity to identify and categorise distinct objects, objectives and relevant examples.
The capacity to identify, entertain and quantify doubt.
Knowing established principles including applying steps of logic and reasoning to draw conclusions.
Probing and attacking opposing views including the use of argument, dispute and ridicule.
The exposure of contradictions, fallacies, circular arguments, unproven premises, irrelevant material and disagreement on foundational premises.
Identifying words with two meanings, invalid generalisations, futile discussions and the correct use of analogies and metaphor.
In addition the human mind can identify special qualities of an object and assign numerical values and a hierarchy to its structure and antecedents.
The human mind carries out many of these processes instinctively, they are built into our mind/body set up.
The Science of Yoga further identifies harmonious and beneficial behaviours and procedures which reveal and enhance, rather than disrupt, the essential unity of life. Such principles are found in cultural, philosophical and religious traditions around the world;
Human consciousness has another possibility certainly not open to a computer, the direct appreciation or experience of the grand unity of life. In other words, participating in the WHOLENESS of existence. We are aware that a human can only know one thing at a time, whereas the laws of nature know and manage all things everywhere simultaneously. Something that religious people designate as God’s Will. Despite the limitation of human consciousness to one thing at a time, the apex of human awareness involves rising to a complete harmony with natural law that gives the benefit of all knowledge—becoming fully immersed in the natural order and essential joy of creation. An achievement that has been recognised in the lives of saints and sages throughout the ages.
What is national law?
Society is subject to national law which is created by human intervention operating in the field of politics and justice. Since time immemorial it has been recognised that national law depends for its authority on natural law. Only if national law respects and harmonises with natural law does it have true validity. If national law contradicts or violates natural law, it fails to uphold the integrity of society. When natural law is continuously violated in individual and national life, stress builds up in individual and collective consciousness and in nature, eventually erupting into conflict and catastrophe..
We cannot vote for natural law in national elections. In fact, politicians we elect do not generally recognise the sovereign power of natural law. Successive governments have passed laws which fail to recognise the steps of valid reasoning outlined above. Thus mistakes pile up on top of one another. In this way national law legitimises the violation of natural law. For example, sweeping generalisations have been made about the safety of small percentages of chemical or biosynthetic compounds added to foods, as well as processing residues. This has not been based on actual safety testing. As a result there have been rapidly accelerating rates of cancer. Such mistakes fail to grasp the integrated interdependent evolutionary history of the biosphere—how natural food chains allow the assimilation of nature’s intelligence.
Crucially, the intelligence of living organisms including human intelligence depends on the integrity of our genetic structures. This in turn depends on the quality of food we consume everyday. Whole fresh unadulterated food is essential to maintain health. Moreover our capacity to harmonise with natural law depends on the natural integrity of our own genetic structures in all their complexity and sophistication. Thus genetic structures support the ability to experience the fundamental nexus of cosmic life. How this miracle of life is achieved is beyond the understanding of modern biotechnology, yet the biotech industry is continuing to recklessly edit genetic systems. A recipe for disaster that dwarfs most other dangers of the modern age and threatens annihilation.
How do you increase harmony with natural law?
We are faced with the reckless ignorance of modern politicians and parties about the dangers of biotechnology and their consequent inability to protect human health and happiness. New laws like the NZ Gene Technology Bill are sweeping aside common rights and protections in a rush to deregulate biotech experimentation, even mandating individual compliance. Although almost powerless at the ballot box due to the lack of suitable candidates and knowledgeable media coverage, we can become more powerful and influence decision making. We can do this through recognising the power of WHOLENESS within. This can be achieved through increased harmony with natural law, whereby the power of nature is co-opted to our cause. This is an indirect approach to conflict resolution, but the power of natural law which governs the whole universe is actually the best friend and supporter we can have.
We have control over our thought, speech and action, including what food we consume.
The essence of natural law is truth, remaining truthful is a powerful technology to harness natural law. The technique to achieve this was explained by Shakespeare who wrote this advice in his play Hamlet:
“This above all: to thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man.”
History records the lives of individuals in every age who liberated their nations because they stuck resolutely to truth and justice. The highest form of ‘being true to thine own self’ is achieved in deep meditation but the saying also calls for disciplined thinking and speaking. The sweet truth is important, overly harsh words, even though true, can harm others. Constantly finding fault with others without providing solutions reflects back negatively on everyone including oneself. Every teacher knows that identifying even one positive trait in a student and then appreciating and encouraging it, works a thousand times better than criticism and disparagement.
We cannot know the innumerable effects of any action in their entirety, but always consider the time and place of any action. Is the action suitable for the environment? Is the time right?
The ancients celebrated and acknowledged the changing seasons and the cycles of nature which support growth. For example, it is well known that planting according to the phases of the moon is more successful, perhaps what is not so well known is how the effect of the seasons, circadian rhythms and lunar phases spills over into everyday life. The current English parliament was elected and the cabinet chosen on a no moon day, you can check the result out in the newspapers.
Cathedrals, temples and ancient monuments were often oriented to the rising sun. The morning sun is especially healing and energising. According to architectural principles known as Vastu Vidya, an entrance facing true east brings support of nature and improved health for the occupants.
Avoid cruelty to others and to animals. Those that put profit before health, happiness, morality and justice degrade the quality of their life and that of others. There are always consequences in this life or the next. Ultimately truth alone will triumph.
Politicians have assumed more and more power over our daily lives in ignorance of the sovereignty of natural law. But nature knows better than man how to organise. Working with nature is important. An organic diet rich in whole foods and fresh fruits and vegetables is healthy, it connects us with the pool of genetic intelligence in the biosphere. When I worked in Armenia for a year, high up in the Caucasus Mountains the dinner table included plates of fresh herbs to sprinkle on the meal. I met many people of a great age still in fine health. There were also many caves carved into hillsides where early Christian mystics practised meditation. Ancient traditions including herbal medicine in the home have been mistakenly forgotten. Around monasteries in Europe, there are still varieties of medicinal herbs flourishing in meadows. Variety is the spice of life.
Invitation
For a forest to be green, the trees must be green. For the world to be at peace, for the government to act intelligently, for the society to be healthy, peace, intelligence and health must be within the reach of individual members. This should be the result of education. Unfortunately education today has failed its students. They are not developing their full potential and graduates remain unaware of their deep connection with natural law. This is why we are continuing to promote our educational initiative to understand the wholeness of life and act in accord with natural law. We are inviting you to support and participate in this endeavour and look forward to hearing from you.
The average number of sunshine hours in New Zealand is above 2,000 per year. In the United Kingdom, it averages around 1,350.
Incredibly, the Telegraph reports that the British government has decided to approve experiments to ‘dim the light of the sun’. The British boffins (is that the right term or should it be ‘buffoons’, or possibly ‘dimwits’) are going to try to turn clouds whiter and intend to seed the upper atmosphere with pollution in order to deflect light from the sun. I suppose they are aware of periods in history when particles emitted by volcanic eruptions dimmed the light of the sun and caused widespread famine and death. But no matter, Prof Mark Symes, the programme director for ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), said: “Everything we do is going to be safe by design.”
The UK isn’t stopping there, in what should be a win for common sense the Supreme Court has ruled there are only two sexes, but a movement has sprang up across the country. Some hospitals are defying moves to have women only wards. The London Marathon organisers have decided to let trans people run in the women’s category offering a life line to those bearded ladies with their larger hearts and bigger bone structures who aspire to the top step of sporting achievement. Sometimes we just don’t know what to think.
Over in the United States, President Trump is worried that there are too few genuine American babies being born and too many foreign tourist births. A curious mix. The fall in fertility that has engulfed the Western world should be a matter of concern. Certainly, our diet and lifestyle are having an effect, but have we considered our clothing? We should be. A study published in 1993 entitled “Effect of different types of textile fabric on spermatogenesis: an experimental study” found that male dogs that were dressed in polyester underpants lost fertility whereas there was no effect on those dressed in cotton or wool. Similar studies on female dogs in 2007/8 found falls in fertility and effects of polyester garments on pregnancy including spontaneous abortions. How they managed to persuade the dogs to wear underpants for six months is a mystery, an even bigger mystery is why they didn’t ask the same questions of humans? How dim is that? This should have raised red flags thirty years ago. Instead our underwear shops are full of polyester.
Nature knows better than man how to organise
Nature is not just neutral. It is trying to help us. Fashionable scientists and governments from both sides of the aisle scoff at those sticking to natural living. It seems that everyone these days feels they have the right to edit or cancel nature. Have we forgotten that nature has laws? These are not rules, they are paths to promote evolution. Physical laws have a common mathematical structure of least action. With their cosmic reach, they have succeeded over millions of eons and continue to operate in our favour today. Nature is not just neutral as some seem to think, it supports and promotes health. Organic cotton vs polyester, whole foods vs processed foods, sunshine vs artificial light, herbs vs chemicals, the fragrance of a rose vs synthetic scents, natural immunity vs injections, fresh air vs air conditioning, spring water vs chlorinated and fluoridated water, the human voice vs autotune: we know which ones come first. Take one step more and realise that ‘natural’ is not just helpful, it is essential. And then a second step to realise that thousands of synthetic chemicals and processes are polluting and degrading life on the planet, the air, the water, the soil, our food, our life and our health.
Most people can feel the distinction between the real and the synthetic, you can touch, see, taste, smell or hear the difference. Consumers instinctively care about traditional natural foods. A misconception of the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill and similar biotech deregulation around the world is the suggestion that there will be a high demand for ‘climate friendly’ alternative foods. This doesn’t seem to be the case. An article from the Australian Daily Mail entitled “Vegan ‘butcher’ unleashes as business dries up amid surprising new trend: ‘We’re out of money’“. It documents falling demand for plant based meat alternatives with multiple companies in the industry going under during the last two years.
The article documents the reasons consumers are turning away including:
Higher price: “Budget concerns are a much bigger factor now, and also environmental concerns, [i.e. long term damage to the environment] “
“Plant-based was considered healthy, then people realised it’s mostly processed foods and the trend now is on whole foods,”
Most of these meat alternatives are produced using biotech processes subject to residual DNA contamination in virtually all products. Contrary to the expectations of governments and biotech entrepreneurs, these are not proving attractive to consumers. They aren’t economic winners for anyone.
There is a deeper agenda here. Cast aside for a moment all the legislative fluff contained in hundreds of pages of the Gene Technology Bill, the main purpose appears to be the removal of any requirement to label the GM origin of biotech foods. This will remove any element of consumer preference. We simply won’t know what we are eating. The biotech moguls believe removal of any labelling is the only way for GM foods to establish a market presence. This amounts to a carte blanche to experiment on the public, a ‘licence to kill’ which extends into the field of medicine as happened during the pandemic.
Of course, under the proposed regulatory regime, GM food will not be sold without any labels, their labels will happily splash about deceptive and misleading words like natural, healthy, whole, nutritious, tasty and so on without any hint of their GM origins. The whole Gene Technology Bill enterprise is an intentional consumer fraud.
We cannot change the past, but what we do in the present can change our future
Write to your MP, demand the withdrawal of the Gene Technology Bill and a provision for full disclosure labelling of all genetically altered origins including processing using genetically modified microorganisms. Tell your friends, shopkeepers you know and work colleagues about the Gene Technology Bill. There has been so little public discussion that few people are aware of its draconian provisions,
Sunday 27th is the last day to make a submission to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Phase 2. Make your submission and add the observation that the Gene Technology Bill pre-empts the Commission’s work. It contains a clause legalising medical mandates. The Bill should be withdrawn.
This article goes deeply into the principles of natural law governing life everywhere, it presents fundamental problems outlined in recently published scientific papers and then suggests the solution.
Fortunately, some responsible scientists around the world are continuing to investigate the fallout from the global mRNA COVID-19 vaccination programme which delivered 13 billion doses in total. Japanese scientists have completed a study of the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on Pancreatic Cancer (PC) patients in their hospital system entitled “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study“. The study is having a global impact, within a day of its publication it has already been downloaded 4000 times.
The study begins with the obligatory homage to mRNA technology damning it with faint praise as “a significant technological advance”, which is a misrepresentation still necessary to ensure the paper’s acceptance for publication (yes, journals are still clinging on to the fantasy). It then plunges into the detailed story of cancer vulnerability. It examined the impact of COVID-19 vaccinations on the survival of 272 PC patients in their hospital admitted between January 2018 and November 2023.
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive cancer with a low survival rate (about 10-12% after 5 years). It is often detected at a late stage when it is already invading nearby structures, eventually metastasising to other parts of the body. The Japanese study found that repeated COVID-19 booster vaccinations are associated with poorer overall survival in patients with PC.
“Patient outcomes had improved each year by 2020; however, it began to deteriorate in 2021 and outcomes in 2022-2023 were significantly worse than those in 2018-2021”
The authors investigated a possible mechanism and concluded as follows:
“Notably, our analysis reveals that high levels of IgG4 [an immune suppressant we have discussed in many previous reports including our Open Letter to Medical Professionals and Life Scientists] induced by vaccination, correlate with a detrimental prognosis in these patients.These insights provide essential information regarding the interplay between vaccination and cancer progression, which has significant implications for patient management strategies. Our study highlights the necessity for ongoing research into the long-term effects of mRNA vaccinations on cancer prognosis, which remains a pressing concern in the evolving landscape of public health and cancer treatment.”
The complex statistical analysis involved detailed consideration and matching into groups for age, sex, comorbidities, treatment history, vaccination history, etc. Overall those COVID-19 vaccinated 2 times had a longer survival than those vaccinated 3 times (p=0.006). Microbiological testing found a reduced immune response in the 3 times vaxxed group compared to the 2 times vaxxed group. The study did not examine outcomes for other cancer types. I leave this omission for your reflection.
The enduring mystery is why our health system is still recommending and encouraging mRNA COVID-19 vaccination? The release of this study comes following on from the release of dozens of others we have reported (see here for example) documenting serious adverse effects and higher death rates following mRNA vaccination. Yet on the same day as the study release, April 16, the World Health Organisation announced a legally binding agreement among its members (including New Zealand) on how to respond to future pandemics. Central to this agreement, which is set to be ratified in May, is the ‘sharing’ of drugs and vaccines between rich and poor nations. A better word than sharing might be proliferation.
The nature of life is to grow
How can it be that the world’s so-called medical experts have got it so wrong that they are still promoting a vaccination method which itself promotes cancer progression? The answer lies in a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of life. The discovery of DNA in 1953 has established a myth that the key to life has been discovered and nothing much more needs to be said about life’s abstract basis. This has shifted the focus of medical research onto a programme of editing DNA and then measuring what happens. An essentially destructive approach to life.
The deeper import of the discovery of DNA has somehow escaped the field of biotechnology. DNA is the physiological mechanism by which life perpetuates itself. Simply put ‘the nature of life is to grow’. ;Any process of editing DNA is going to try to perpetuate itself—almost the definition of cancer. The immune system is dedicated to defending the unique characteristics of an individual’s DNA. It corrects accidental mutations trillions of times over every 24 hour period. Given this situation, those researching DNA set themselves to solve the ‘problem(???)’ of how to defend their edits from being rejected by the immune system. In other words, how to give their edited version of DNA a chance to grow. To do so, they have experimented with means to evade or shut down natural immune responses (seehere for more discussion). Again we arrive at the door of cancer.
A study published in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience entitled “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination” confirms just how successful they have been in perpetuating their rogue genetic edits. This study found the presence of COVID-19 spike protein in the cerebral arteries of almost half of female stroke victims up to 17 months post vaccination. This was accompanied by evidence of inflammatory cell infiltration. This finding reinforces the results of other studies which have located persistent spike protein in different areas of the physiology. The implication is clear, COVID-19 vaccine genetic sequences appear to effectively interfere with the long term genetic functioning of recipients. This is not a desirable or tolerable outcome.
Our cellular genetic system is remarkable. Every cell contains the whole genome, so the whole is contained in every part. Yet the whole is more than the sum of the parts.These principles of SCI do not just apply to a single organism, each species has cellular DNA at its basis. Together, the world of millions of types of organisms form a WHOLE network. There is a constant mutual exchange of influence, information and nourishment going on in this vast network, all based on the structural yet also dynamic intelligence contained in cellular genetics. Order is present everywhere in the system. It is not random. The whole system is grounded in the underlying laws of nature investigated by physics, but crucially it is also an expression of the supreme intelligence personified in consciousness. Thuslife is built up in layers on the ground of consciousness. The outer depends on inner.
The important thing to appreciate here is the wholesale assault on the order of natural law that is currently taking place. As we have reported, the genetic engineering of our food sources (grains and vegetables), food processing (using genetically modified microorganisms), organisms (animals and insects), medical interventions and cosmetics is undermining the holistic order in nature and in our lives. All of these modified elements are, according to the nature of genetic systems, vying with one another to survive, grow and take over existing natural processes. They are doing so, not holistically based on millions of years of mutually beneficial evolution, but incoherently and destructively based on millions of man made and computer generated DNA edits. This all points in one direction, genetic experimentation needs to stop. It has become a cancer rapidly growing throughout society and in the lives of individuals.
Very early on in the pandemic, eminent scientists like Robert Malone warned about this obvious possibility or rather inevitability, but their warnings went unheeded. Worse, efforts were made to undermine their credibility and cancel their public platform. By this time, vast pandemic profits were in prospect. Money and influence was expended to ensure these were realised. Now the WHO agreement wants to set this prospect in concrete. It needs to be opposed. Fortunately the US has withdrawn its funding from WHO, an example New Zealand needs to study very carefully. Our science policy needs to take account of scientific findings rather than ignore them.
So why aren’t studies like those cited above raising alarm bells in the media?
This year’s AUT (Auckland University of Technology) annual Trust in Media Survey found that only 32% of Kiwis trust the media most of the time, down from 53% in early 2020. Dr. Merja Myllylahti, co-director of the AUT Research Centre for Journalism, Media, and Democracy (JMAD), was interviewed this week by Jack Tame of TVNZ. She said criticism of media coverage during the pandemic was unfair because the media was not singing the government messaging (???) Myllylahti believes that media organisations are now doing a more transparent job of explaining what they are doing and correcting their mistakes(???) This lack of self-reflection was extraordinary and confronting. In a totally confusing interview, Myllylahti described open media debate in the US as chaos. Whereas we know that open access platforms like Substack and X are actually the information transfer and debating forums that have enabled us to share the results of scientific investigation that governments and vested interests have tried to hide from the public. Incredibly, Myllylanti said she has no idea why Kiwis don’t trust the media (LOL). Even denying there is any such thing as objectivity—almost a rejection of truth and a licence to ignore scientific findings. None of this was called out by Jack Tame who seemed oblivious to what was staring him in the face.
A test of truth needs three elements:
Personal experience—what happens to people
Scientific investigation—using logic and experimentation
Traditional use—does it last in time?
Initially government advisors uncritically accepted the advice from the pharmaceutical and biotech industry that mass vaccination would be safe and effective. Then they made a fatal error, they deliberately ignored or discounted the millions of reports of adverse effects. This meant they had rejected one of the foundational principles of knowledge—personal experience. Nor had long term safety been established, especially as gene therapy was known to have long term consequences. This was glossed over. Again, with fatal consequences which are still unfolding.
Pandemic policy didn’t have the required breadth of evidence to pass as knowledge. We were told to trust the science, but it wasn’t science that was being offered to us. Pandemic policy became an exercise in ideology, authority, publicity and profit to the detriment of public health. It still is. It is critical going forward to continue to question the faulty policies that WHO, governments, medical authorities, the media and others with vested interests are promoting. This is why the Hatchard Report has a policy of referencing published science, analysing logic and referencing traditional knowledge. We are in a fight for survival, we need to speak up.
If ever I die and thee be not sure that I’m dead Just put butter and jam on fresh baked bread Then wave them vittles over me head If my mouth don’t open, thee be sure that I’m dead
Appreciation of bread is a universal language. Cultures all over the world have their favourites—wholewheat, pita, lavash, chapati, sourdough, corn bread, pumpernickel, baguette. The list is long and people are very protective of their traditions and tastes.
Eight years later, if you ask Google today ‘Is yeast free of GM ingredients?’, it will answer in the affirmative and refer you to the 2018 study. Whew! So why did I get a headache when I ate too many slices of toast for breakfast?
To get around the need to convince consumers that their bread was still pure and traditional. Bakers began a tradition of ‘flour improvers’. I say ‘bakers’, but I don’t actually mean bakers, I should have said chemists and biotechnologists because they are the ones designing our daily bread. (Just in passing, I wonder if we would trust the person who empties our septic tank to make our wedding cake?) These are lauded in PR blurbs as ingenious people who come up with creative solutions to problems (that don’t actually exist).
amylases, hemicellulases, transglutaminases, pentosanases, proteases, mono- and diglycerides, ascorbic acid, potassium bromate, benzoyl peroxide, chloride di-oxide, potassium iodate, chlorine, azodicarbonamide, L-cysteine hydrochloride, sodium metabisulphite, lipophilic glyceryl monostearate, sodium stearoyl lactylate, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides, lecithin, lipoxygenase, xylanase, guar and xanthan gum, calcium propionate, acetic acid, vinegar, butylated hydroxyanisole, propylene glycol, tert-butylhydroquinone, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, sodium erythorbate and polyglycerol esters, along with so-called fortification additives including ferrous sulphate, calcium carbonate, zinc sulphate, thiamine hydrochloride, riboflavin, nicotinic acid, folic acid and vitamin A acetate.
This is not even a comprehensive list, I forgot to mention the agrochemical residues for example, but they are all permitted by the authorities supposed to be protecting our health who allow most of them to be lumped together on the label under the title ‘flour improvers’??? Their actual purpose is to ensure that supermarket bread can be produced uniformly and continuously in super quick time yet last the distance for long periods in a plastic bag at room temperature, all achieved using the cheapest possible ingredients through industrial scale mechanised processes.
If you bake sourdough at home you will know that none of these ingredients are necessary for a successful product, although a little bit of practice and knowledge goes a long way.
The effect of this chemical cocktail on the consumer is really of little interest to those producing the bread. Many years ago I had a meeting with the CEO of one of New Zealand’s biggest bread makers, I was urging him to restart production of their discontinued organic bread line. He replied that consumers were not interested enough, and then confided in me that he never ate his company’s bread, he only bought artisan sourdough for home consumption. Seeing the above list of ingredients, I can see why:)
However, this does not stop the people responsible for marketing bread showing pictures of golden wheat blowing in the wind and basking in the sunshine along with made up stories about the miraculous health benefits of bread (if only it actually deserved the name bread) and yeast. A Stuff newspaper report quotes Ralph Thorogood, chairman of the Baking Industry Research Trust which represents the only two big companies making bread in New Zealand (both owned by overseas interests), argues that in principle commercial bakers don’t do anything different to what an artisan baker does saying:
“Weighing up our ingredients, we mix them together in a large scale mixer the same as the craft bakery does. We take that dough and divide it into individual pieces. The craft baker does it by hand on a divider.” Yeah Right!!
Yeast is not what we are told it is
With those words of commercial wisdom, let us return to yeast itself. Over the years, our universities have trained a great many biotechnologists. These people all need a crust to live on and something to do with their lives. Stymied by the consumer preference in Europe for natural yeast, they worked with the marketing gurus to come up with an acceptable work around. Enter stage left ‘self cloned’ yeast, a term which was judged to be potentially acceptable to consumers, or rather might deceive them. Self cloned yeast is just genetically modified yeast with a deceptive name. It is widely used in bread making today and is rapidly replacing natural yeast. Of course the obliging regulators decided it doesn’t need to be identified as Genetically Modified (GM), after all it has a pretty enough name, no need to confuse fussy consumers. In the end the labels just say ‘yeast’.
Our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth” explains that all of the genetically modified processes which produce the multitude of ingredients in bread have one very concerning and scientifically verified problem—genetic contamination with DNA fragments that can take control of our physiological processes and potentially give us a headache and much worse.
So we have arrived at a crisis. The supermarket plastic fantastic loaf is off the table and that little packet of yeast we buy at the supermarket to put in our healthy bread maker at home is actually not healthy at all nor apparently only yeast nor even what we formerly called yeast. The answer lies in expensive artisan breads for those who can afford them, home made sourdough for those with the time, or with chapatis—unleavened breads you can make at home in ten minutes (not the store bought wraps or chapatis).
I know that this is all very challenging, depressing even, especially for busy people and families, but it is nonetheless happening to us. It is as if we have suddenly discovered that our familiar friends, upon whom we rely, are not our friends at all. Bread is just one example among thousands of convenience foods and drinks whose production processes are being genetically redesigned by biotechnologists and then deceptively marketed as ‘healthy, natural, precise, nourishing, and beneficial’ (poison, dare I say it).
Our digestive processes, our liver, our kidneys have to deal with the fallout everyday, but there are aspects of DNA contamination which can’t be easily managed. This puts a strain on our capacity to maintain optimum health. It can seriously degrade health. Multiple studies that we have often reported over the last few years point to an association between processed food consumption, chronic illness and cancer—conditions whose incidence is accelerating. So far the processed food industry has been hiding behind the complexity of the food chain, saying that there is no proven causation. This is a convenient cover for their lack of honesty, integrity, and disregard for consumer health, involving deceptive labelling, secretive changes to traditional foods and now genetic engineering of ingredients and processes.
The government is trying to pass the Gene Technology Bill which will remove GM labelling requirements, grant immunity from criminal responsibility, do away with any need for testing and encourage genetic experimentation with our food. A sort of harakiri for our traditional foods. Now is the time to speak up. Contact your local MP. Call for the Bill to be withdrawn. Call for all GM ingredients to be identified on labels. Call for an end to risky biotechnology experimentation. Call your supermarket. Don’t buy these unlabelled GM contaminated items and tell them why. Tell them to get different suppliers and different goods. We as consumers have a lot more power than we realise.
A study undertaken in the EU entitled “Pesticide residues with hazard classifications relevant to non-target species including humans are omnipresent in the environment and farmer residences” has found residues of more than 200 different pesticides in household dust across Europe. Most of the pesticide residues were hazardous to non-target species (that includes us humans), and some of the pesticides found were non-approved highly hazardous types. Pesticides were also detected in the air we breathe and the water we drink. It raises the question of forever chemicals accumulating relentlessly in the environment. Other sources of pollution include construction materials used in homes, traffic exhaust, plastic micro particles, etc. The cumulative effects are unknown but are suspected to significantly contribute to the rising incidence of diseases like cancer, allergies and inflammatory illness.
You are probably already aware of these sources of pollution. You may be taking care to avoid them as much as possible. For example you may prefer organic food—the study found lower levels of pollution in and around organic farms. Some of you may be taking your shoes off before entering the house. You may even live in a house constructed of natural materials in a remote area. You may try to avoid polyester. You may filter your household water supply. Despite all these personal measures, we are all facing rising levels of pollution with inadequately assessed consequences for our health.
Increasingly, the biggest sources of pollution in our lives are the pre-prepared foods we buy at the supermarket. The substitution of natural enzymatic processing aids with genetically engineered versions has increased not just the level of pollution but the type of hazard. Engineered versions are designed to be more long lasting and powerful in their action. Moreover, as we have reported in our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth“, they are contaminated with antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacterial strains as well as genetic promoters designed to catalyse cell proliferation.
For example, sauces and pickled condiments like chutneys, ketchup and mayonnaise contain acetic acid (Food Additive No. E260). Acetic acid is the main component of vinegar and is widely used in various food products as a flavour, acidity regulator and preservative. It used to be produced through a process of natural fermentation and was generally recognised as safe (GRAS) when consumed in reasonably small quantities. Now the majority is produced synthetically on an industrial scale, using genetic engineering. The changes introduced in the manufacturing process are manyfold, including:
Artificial stimulation of the expression of the gene for pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH), an enzyme.
Modifying acetogenic bacteria which enable acetic acid to be produced from a wider range of raw materials
Introducing high temperature tolerant modified bacterial genes
These processes inevitably involve residual contamination of the end food product including novel DNA along with associated health consequences that have not been studied or acknowledged by the processed food industry. Patak’s Mango Chutney for example now includes E260 among its ingredients. We have stopped buying it. There is actually no need to include any E260. Herbs and spices supply enough flavour and its sugar content preserves long life. This is just one product among thousands that have been altered by genetically modified microorganisms.
Cooking has always involved processes, but until the chemical proliferation of the twentieth century these were naturally induced by boiling, decoction, precipitation, fermentation, dehydration, milling, etc or through the addition of natural herbs and products from plants and animals. Over millennia our physiology became accustomed to these, not just through repeated exposure, but because they involve natural DNA that echoed our own, with which we share long phylogenetic roots. Our digestion is able to naturally derive nourishment from these. Another word for nourishment or nutrition is the assimilation of order or intelligence.
The engineered genetic structures that are now accompanying processed foods contain man-made genetic sequences that are foreign to our digestion and physiology. The body has no history of assimilating these, nor would we want to. Genetic sequences initiate a completely different kind of pollution from chemicals, they contain instructions to carry out and control complex biological processes. They can potentially interface with parts of our physiology and overwhelm or take over other processes. Many of them are actually designed to do so during food processing but when ingested they can start similar foreign processes in our physiology. These can be very unhealthy, such as those genetically engineered to precipitate solids in solution used to make cheeses which might affect our blood, coronary and arterial systems, menstruation, haemorrhoids, varicose veins, circulation, brain blood supply, etc.
Importantly, genetic sequences are the physical counterparts of conscious processes. They are as if thoughts or memories, fragments of consciousness expressing itself. As we have reported here and here, studies show people receiving organ transplants can experience the preferences or desires of the donor. People receiving stem cells during bone marrow transplants can experience psychological difficulties. Contamination from synthetic genetically engineered sequences during food processing is a novel form of contamination whose consequences remain unresearched.
However, the detailed long term consequences of mRNA vaccination are beginning to be examined. A 2025 study for example published in Molecular Systems Biology entitled “Persistent epigenetic memory of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in monocyte-derived macrophages” reveals that mRNA jabs may cause a level of epigenetic rearrangement that challenges the immune system and its capacity to keep cancer at bay.
So why haven’t we been reading much about this in mainstream media? Alex Berenson is an investigative reporter formerly of the NY Times, now writing on Substack.com using the handle Unreported Truths. Berenson’s site is proving to be a clearing house for leaked information from the scientific community. In some recent posts Berenson reveals that many scientists are aware of the problems with mRNA vaccines (they don’t work and cause a wide range of adverse effects) and are actively discussing them in closed sessions. But they are circling the wagons and refusing to go public with concerns. There is apparently too much at stake—funding, professional standing, in fact the validity of the whole gene therapy enterprise.
Fundamentally, the growing use of gene editing is knocking on the door of the absolute fundamental of life, the organising power of consciousness which expresses itself through genetic structures. If the biotech community and its corporate masters continue to roll out their plans for even more invasive and disruptive technologies, they will inevitably initiate more widespread damage than the pandemic has so far. The question is when will the penny drop and how far down the road to disaster will we have travelled by then? More to the point, how can we stop the out of control gene vehicle and get back from there?
There is no doubt in my mind that the ancient science of Ayurveda has encountered something similar in the past. The ancient record of the Mahabharata war five thousand years ago talks about human cloning and the disastrous consequences for the peace and stability of individuals, families and nations. Ayurveda offers rejuvenation therapies which enliven transformative processes inherent in our physiology to encourage a healthy aging process. Ancient Ayurvedic texts refer to procedures called Pancha Karma—five fold cleansing and Kayakalpa, literally ‘renewal of the body’. These approaches had been to a certain extent lost or distorted as a result of the persecution of traditional Indian medicine under British rule, but they are now beginning to be rediscovered. They are highly specific and exacting, a necessary feature of their success. The use of pure herbal ingredients, meditation techniques, and breathing exercises under the supervision of traditional experts is necessary. It may be that the world will need to look to the knowledge of Ayurveda kept alive in Indian family traditions for answers to the long term woes of genetic engineering, but be careful of pharmaceutical industries who are contaminating traditional medicine everywhere.
Today all that is still in the future, because the scientific community is paralysed by their own hubris, unable to own up to their mistakes or stop their programme of genetic experimentation. The Gene Technology Bill is set to open the door to disaster wider, the New Zealand Parliament is promising the earth but is actually sleep walking towards the zero hour. To use a coarse phrase, don’t piss on my door and tell me it is only rain. Contact your MP, they need waking up.