spot_imgspot_img
Home Blog Page 45

Has Government Policy and Media Coverage Sunk To New Lows?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Has Government Policy and Media Coverage Sunk To New Lows?

Straw Poll—Which is True? Has Government Policy and Media Coverage of the Pandemic Sunk To New Lows or has it Risen to Heights of the Irrational?

Today NewsHub ran a straw poll asking Kiwis if the unvaccinated should be charged for hospital treatment.

The article received a resounding endorsement from University of Auckland epidemiologist Rod Jackson who was worried that when he next fell off a ladder he would be denied treatment because our hospital system is about to be clogged with thousands of seriously ill unvaccinated.

His ‘back of the envelope’ calculations included 900,000 under twelves among the unvaccinated, presumably he will be expecting them to pay up too.

NZ Initiative Chief Economist Dr. Eric Crampton thought this was a great idea. He said it would encourage vaccination and reduce health costs.

Hold on a minute, as a principle, this has great promise. Lung cancer is the leading cause of death in NZ with close to 2000 new cases each year.

The estimated cost of alcohol misuse in NZ is $7.85 billion. And then there are the obese, in 2019 the NZ government estimated that the annual cost of obesity in NZ was $624 million.

There is a double whammy here, smokers, alcohol abusers, and the obese are all far more likely to get Covid seriously, whether vaccinated or unvaccinated.

As these conditions mostly result from personal choices, shouldn’t these groups pay for their own health care?

No of course not, these people are just exercising their freedom of choice to have fun. Kiwis are not against fun, are we?

The unvaccinated are after all against fun, these killjoys are too busy taking care of their own health naturally and avoiding the unquantified risks of medical interventions to have fun.

Whoops, Did I Miss Something?

Thirty percent of all hospital medical expenditure in New Zealand ($870 million per annum) goes towards the treatment of adverse medical events (i.e. the remediation of illness caused by inappropriate medicines and treatments).

Should we make doctors pay for the treatment of adverse events?

This could save a lot of money….

The fact is that current media coverage is stoking fear and loathing. Is it appropriate to decide government policy by taking stock of a misinformed public?

As Jacinda Ardern suggested this week, we can ignore the concerns of the unvaccinated because they are not representative of Kiwis.

Are plans in the wings to deny them citizenship? Good idea, that will make them see sense. 

I am a scientist. The publication of scientific studies during the last two weeks in leading journals, raising further questions about long-term vaccine safety, carry weight with me, but I hope I can survive the weight of hysterical public opinion long enough to convince the media and the government to come clean.

Both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated catch and spread Covid easily, undermining the Government’s policy to inflame public opinion and deflect criticism by blaming and segregating the unvaccinated.

Quietly we have been underfunding hospital care and underpaying nurses for years, moreover, we have ignored the powerful effects of preventive health measures.

What would I do? Covid is predominantly a disease of the already ill. 85% of those becoming seriously ill have confounding comorbidities.

In addition to rational scientifically-supported public health measures and treatments specific to Covid, I would be betting on long-term measures to support public health by educating the public that healthy habits of exercise, diet, and sufficient rest are key methods to maintain health.

I might take GST off fresh fruit and vegetables. I could tax sugar and hard fats. I might improve labelling of ultra-processed foods.

I might legislate to improve air quality in homes by reducing the use of off-gassing building materials.

A Jaime Oliver style healthy eating programme in schools would be a big hit. Meditation and yoga are proven to have a big impact on health.

I’m dreaming aren’t I?

Far better to coop the unvaccinated up in ghettos and just have fun.

What Are the Urgent Historical Lessons of the Covid Crisis

Guy Hatchard
-
0
What Are the Urgent Historical Lessons of the Covid Crisis

Since the discovery of DNA, governments all over the world have poured money into the education of biotechnologists. Biotechnology gets the lion’s share of financial support at universities.

A whole generation of young biotech professionals has been created with a mission to change the world and a need to ensure that the funding of their research aspirations and their profession continues.

Going back to the nineties, genetically engineered crops were perceived as the future of biotechnology—they would revolutionise agricultural production and feed the world.

This promise was hype, it has not been realised in practice and crucially most people didn’t want scientists messing with their food.

The push back against engineered food was strong and successful.

Overnight biotechnologists became a cohort of highly trained individuals without a mission and with an uncertain future.

The intense debate surrounding GM food was skillfully redirected, whilst food might be a sacred cow, surely everyone could agree upon the medical application of biotechnology?

The new mission was an end to ill health, prevention of diseases, longer lifespans, and the correction of inherited genetic defects.

This was eagerly welcomed in all quarters and led to an accelerated growth in medical biotech experimentation.

This switch in direction was accompanied by carefully planned lobbying of governments and regulators, public relations full of rosy promises, and the development of commercial alliances.

Aware that their push to take over global agriculture had been scuppered by ‘natural’ activists, biotech moved to undermine the natural health products sector.

Draconian regulation of natural products was promoted and instituted in many countries and the myth that biotech medicines were more uniform and safer than natural herbs was promoted.

During this phase of the biotech campaign, global networks of regulators and cooperative data sharing were instituted.

For example, the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) was formed, an extra-governmental body closely allied with pharmaceutical companies and WHO.

This body openly sought to harmonise and incentivise the use of biotech medicines.

The problem with all these preparations was the ineffectiveness of the biotech technologies that were being researched and their dangerous side effects.

New medical biologic technologies consistently failed to meet established safety standards and also failed to adequately address the health problems they were designed to fix.

In one area, they were able to push ahead—biotech began to investigate the plethora of viruses that exist in nature and learned how to manipulate them.

Military involvement and funding of this endeavour was inevitable.

This research was promoted as a way to head off future pandemics.

The dark truth was the opposite—new viruses were secretly being created in unsafe laboratories and they posed threats to global health.

The story of the Wuhan Virology Institute and ‘gain of function’ experimentation has been widely explored.

The whole truth about it may never be known, but certainly, its lessons have not been learned.

Come the covid crisis all the careful planning of the biotech industry swung into action.

Early on it became apparent that covid was primarily a disease of the already unhealthy.

The single most important factors leading to serious incidence of the illnesses were comorbidities and exhaustion, including exhaustion of the immune system.

The vast majority of people were going to recover, so the obvious response at this point was to vigorously research medical interventions that eased the severity of symptoms AND to encourage natural approaches to improve general health including diet, meditation, and exercise. Neither of these happened.

The big money was to be made in universal mandated vaccination which was, long before covid, already the goal of the biotechnology juggernaut.

The public relations machine ramped up—alternative treatments were attacked, fear of the covid was promoted through exaggerated statistics and news items of individual tragedies.

Big money was spent lobbying and contributing to political parties. Through ICMRA, the only acceptable regulatory response mooted was universal vaccination.

Genetic vaccines were developed and the existing medical regulatory safety structure was dismantled overnight as emergency approval was granted.

The very use of the term ‘vaccine’ was designed to allay suspicion of what was essentially a completely novel and risky genetic intervention that fundamentally differed from traditional vaccines.

Researcher Blows the Whistle on Integrity Issues in Pfizer’s Vaccine Trial

The manipulation of government policy and public perception is continuing. mRNA vaccines cause adverse effects almost 60 times that of traditional vaccines, but this has been swept under the carpet (including, as the BMJ revealed on 2 November, through falsification of data at one of the test sites).

The relief of those who have the vaccine and feel generally healthy is played upon as an uncritical acceptance cue, while the stories of those injured by the vaccine are suppressed.

Unlike traditional vaccines, mRNA vaccines readily allow transmission aiding in the development of new mutations, yet public pronouncements continue that vaccines stop transmission.

The effectiveness of the vaccines has been overhyped, 95% might be measured within the first two months after vaccination, but by five months this has dropped below 50%, necessitating booster shots.

No matter, this is the ultimate cash cow of biotechnology, a vaccine that everyone in the world must take every six months.

The real fear of this biotechnology roll out is the unknown and unresearched long-term effects of mRNA and DNA medical interventions—a predicted nightmare we have yet to face.

Where Do We Go From Here?

Where is the research effort to discover what it is about the lifestyles and diet that support those who recover easily?

What is being done to encourage healthy lifestyles—surely the most promising solution to the long-term challenge of the pandemic? How can the highly funded public relations hype surrounding vaccination be aligned with truth?

How can the biased information channels which have been plumbed into governments be sanitised and aligned with real-world data?

Why are young children being vaccinated for an illness that has little effect on them?

It is a time to stand up, speak up and be counted.

Study Finds Covid Spike Protein Impedes DNA Repair

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Study Finds Covid Spike Protein Impedes DNA Repair

A study finds Covid spike protein impedes adaptive immunity and DNA repair in vitro.

DNA repair guards against the development of a very wide range of degenerative conditions and also prevents rapid chain reactions among those on the brink of physiological instability as a result of comorbidities including hidden imbalances.

This raises big questions about the degrading effects of Covid vaccines.

This is the smoking gun of vaccine safety.

Crucially this completely undermines any justification for vaccine mandates.

Also the whole lax voluntary vaccine adverse effects reporting system needs to be immediately upgraded and put on full alert.

A much wider range of adverse effects which had previously been dismissed as unrelated to vaccines needs to be retrospectively included in reporting.

The roll out of vaccines for the young needs to be put on hold immediately.

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV–2) has led to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID–19) pandemic, severely affecting public health and the global economy.

Adaptive immunity plays a crucial role in fighting against SARS–CoV–2 infection and directly influences the clinical outcomes of patients.

Clinical studies have indicated that patients with severe COVID–19 exhibit delayed and weak adaptive immune responses; however, the mechanism by which SARS–CoV–2 impedes adaptive immunity remains unclear.

Here, by using an in vitro cell line, we report that the SARS–CoV–2 spike protein significantly inhibits DNA damage repair, which is required for effective V(D)J recombination in adaptive immunity.

Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site.

Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.

Read the full text here: SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro

Those Who Ignore History Are Doomed to Repeat It

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Those Who Ignore History Are Doomed to Repeat It

Those who ignore history are doomed to repeat it: So what do you do if there is no history?

Caution!!! David Reich, Harvard geneticist, researcher of ancient DNA points out in his book ‘Who We Are, and How We Got Here’, that Adam and Eve extinction events are far more common than has been previously recognised.

Our adaptive evolutionary interface with the natural world around us is primarily through our digestive tract under the control of the body’s intelligence recorded in our DNA.

Now we are entering a new era of biologic genetic medicine—command and control structures are being planted directly into cells, not only bypassing the protective mechanisms inherent in our digestive tract but also altering the way our genetic intelligence functions within cells.

Cultural Diversity is an Evolutionary Safety Valve

CAUTION!!! It is worth reflecting that for the last twenty years geneticists have been researching ways to alter genetic structures, but have stopped short of implementing new technologies because of unintended side effects detected after extensive and lengthy trials.

Covid vaccines have not been subjected to such long-term trials, yet they are being enforced through mandates.

Evolution relies on diversity, it is nature’s safety factor. History shows that experiments in agricultural monoculture are doomed to lead to imbalance.

Similarly, cultural diversity is an evolutionary safety valve.

History is littered with failed experiments in totalitarian control. Central to cultural diversity is freedom of choice, including the capacity to maintain traditions.

On reflection, we recognise that our New Zealand culture is largely founded on the need to escape the social control and limited opportunities in Europe and elsewhere.

We are a people who value freedom and independence highly. Freedom of choice is one of the great sources of joy in life.

Mandating behaviour and medicines beyond the traditional norms is a step into the unknown that requires caution. Mandating a lack of caution is a mistake of the greatest proportions.

Government Planning to Control Natural All Health Products

Yesterday articles appeared widely in the New Zealand press urging control of all natural health products.

They were described as dangerous. People were advised by experts not to trust them in the covid era.

A government spokesman said that plans were being drawn up to control them.

Can we be forgiven for thinking that there are powerful forces conjoining to promote a new future of man-made genetically designed medicine, food, and crops?

A future controlled by large-scale global commercial enterprises—a risky monoculture system with no precedent in our history.

The adoption of genetic technology should not be universally mandated. There are many examples of medical misadventure in the recent past.

There are many highly qualified geneticists sounding the alarm, we are ignoring them, and are doing so because we have forgotten history.

Covid Is in the Main a Disease of the Unhealthy

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Covid Is in the Main a Disease of the Unhealthy

The push to blame the healthy: Statistically, Covid is in the main a disease of the unhealthy, 85% of seriously affected people have comorbidities.

Interestingly there was an article in one of our two national newspapers this morning prominently displayed. “How to avoid the wellness epidemic”.

It appeared to be poking fun at people who wanted to take care of themselves, rather than just taking a jab and returning to their unhealthy habits.

Curiously this was categorised in the ‘wellness’ section of the paper.

For those of us who have campaigned for natural health for years, it is clear that whatever victories we won over the years, we are now facing an all out assault, carefully curated in the media (both social and mainstream).

Increasingly I can’t stop short of calling this a conspiracy.

On the other hand, who is healthy and who is unhealthy?

It is a fine line.

I visited my doctor a few weeks ago for a skin check.

She tested my blood pressure and it was alarmingly elevated.

So she arranged for some blood tests. I had elevated cholesterol.

So, skipping the medication, I cut out butter and cheese, tucked into grapefruits, and took a herbal product.

I am back to the normal range now, but I never would have rated myself as unhealthy.

So a lot of people do unknowingly carry imbalance, and we do need to keep on top of it.

In many cases this can be done without becoming a burden on the health system. A stitch in time saves nine.

The current attacks on the unvaccinated are just part of a generalised move to get people to rely on pharmaceuticals exclusively.

The media (and governments) have become very vulnerable to paid content and influence.

Accordingly, drug companies have worked out how to extend their reach far into the public psyche.

The sustainable solution to Covid is more natural health, not less.

Related content:

You might be interested in my book titled:

Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

New genetic research results indicate that the DNA of plants plays a far greater role in health maintenance than previously thought.

The corollary of this is the great role that food additives, processes, medicines, and pollution are playing in the massive rise of certain diseases such as mental illness and cancer among the young.

Available now via Amazon.com >> Your DNA Diet

Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Contract Covid and Pass It on

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Both Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Contract Covid and Pass It on

Pro-choice: I see many pro-vaccine posts on FB. I am very glad that everyone has their own choice on this and feels confident to air their views.

I am concerned that the narrative about the dangers posed by the ‘unvaccinated’ has become toxic.

The truth is that both the vaccinated and unvaccinated contract Covid and both pass it on easily.

See from today’s Guardian for example:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/28/covid-vaccinated-likely-unjabbed-infect-cohabiters-study-suggests

Another article reports on the main worries—people dying or becoming seriously ill from covid are predominantly those with reduced immunity, especially the over 65s and those with comorbidities.

They need help to strengthen their health, they don’t need fear-based narratives about unvaccinated bogeymen

The transmissibility data undermines the Government’s passport narrative.

Yes, lockdowns have been effective, but no, the main dangers are not the unvaccinated. There is no reason to punish and shun them.

How Did the Hate Campaign Get Going?

You might like to read this article about Harry and Meghan.

It explains how a very small number of paid people can and do influence social media.

Who benefits financially from vaccine passports?

Vaccine companies who are known to influence social media and the regulatory environment.

https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ellievhall/bot-sentinel-meghan-markle-prince-harry-twitter

We are very trusting in NZ, let’s hope we don’t become unwitting vehicles for hate. Vaccine mandates will destroy the lives of many individuals and families with enquiring and ethical minds.

When it comes to Covid the best sources of information remain the original scientific papers, not media scandal sheets.

Published Papers Contradict Government Covid Policy

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Published Papers Contradict Government Covid Policy

Press Release: Published papers contradict Government Covid policy and indicate safety issues

From: Guy Hatchard Ph.D.,

I am a former employee of Genetic ID, a global food testing company. I have expertise in the statistics of safety, I am also a natural food advocate.

You can review my previous influential correspondence and submissions in the Parliamentary Library. I have lobbied previous Director Generals of Health and have been given an audience and a hearing.

Dear Media Representative

The Covid 19 vaccine has been given emergency approval. Vaccines are normally tested for 8-12 years before receiving approval.

During this time they are subjected to stringent tests.

Mandatory reports of adverse reactions are monitored over these years and the resulting statistics are compared with population norms to ascertain if there are any long-term adverse effects.

The data and analysis is subject to rigorous peer review. In some cases, adverse effects have been noted years after first vaccination.

Mandatory Reporting of Adverse Effects

1. In order to guard against underreporting and misreporting of adverse effects, the government needs to immediately institute mandatory reporting of all adverse effects and any illness after vaccination for a minimum of two months (at present reporting of adverse effects is only voluntary and if undertaken generally occurs immediately after vaccination).

It is to be noted that reports have been circulating widely on social media of individuals who have suffered heart attacks, strokes, and other debilitating effects soon after vaccination, but have been told by their GPs that they must be unrelated.

This is not the procedure followed when testing novel vaccines.

To achieve the required safety assessment the Department of Health needs to issue new guidelines to GPs and hospital staff about its CARM system, whose current policies are only geared to fully tested vaccines.

It is further noted that the Prime Minister’s FB page attracted over 33,000 comments about adverse effects which went uninvestigated and unreplied.

It is also noted that a whistleblower in the USA, who is a former employee of their VAERS system has noted deliberate under reporting of adverse effects.

2. As a second check for robust statistical certainty, vaccination date and status should be, until further notice, recorded on death certificates and reports of major medical events and centrally collected.

Without this, it will not be possible to detect any early unexpected adverse effects of vaccination in the general population.

These two requirements alone will be sufficient to fill the information and safety vacuum created by the emergency approval.

Without these, there is no certainty of safety.

How has this situation arisen and why must it be urgently addressed?

The word ‘vaccine’ has powerful and reassuring emotive implications. The public has specific expectations about vaccine safety and efficacy.

We have all benefited from reductions in serious diseases such as polio and smallpox.

Yet the Covid vaccines are not traditional vaccines, they are using novel gene technology.

This technology derives from medical research into experimental gene technology being used to investigate the possibility of helping individuals suffering genetic defects, as is the case in cystic fibrosis for example.

These technologies are known to have caused severe side effects.

They have not yet been developed to a sufficient level of safety to be approved.

Therefore every effort must be made to ensure at least standard safety protocols, such as those above, be implemented for Covid vaccines.

Why does the government need to take advice more widely from science experts other than those in the immediate circle of government?

There are commercial and scientific interests which are heavily invested in the success of the novel technology being used in Covid vaccines.

Their bias has influenced approval of Covid vaccines and treatments. Has this happened here?

Medsafe is a member of the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities.

ICMRA does not have the sanction of any governments, it is a bureaucratic alliance of medical regulators who enjoy close relationships with the global pharmaceutical industry.

It operates a shared database among all its members which it uses to harmonise and control medical choices amongst countries ensuring that all governments will receive the same advice from their regulatory bodies.

It aims to control use of all human medicine including the new genetic biologic medicines and vaccines.

The ICMRA website states its strategic aims: https://icmra.info/drupal/en

Regulatory convergence, alignment, and standards development of all human medicine, which will lead to harmonisation of global regulations.

During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, ICMRA is acting as a forum to support strategic coordination and international cooperation among global medicine regulatory authorities.

The aim of these activities is to expedite and streamline the development, authorisation and availability of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines worldwide.

Thus through a single body, powerful commercial interests can work behind the scenes to influence the global approach to medical regulation in every country.

They are in a position to monitor the information available to government personnel and limit the public message.

New Zealand has always prided itself on a measure of independence from global influence.

We have been a country able to make up its own mind and chart a course that supports our unique character and geographic location.

How Has this Affected New Zealand?

The current primary government messages and impressions conveyed by media coverage are very clear:

1. Selfish, misguided, unvaccinated people are encouraging transmission of Covid and endangering the public-spirited vaccinated citizens.

2. Vaccination is a largely standalone system which, if implemented for at least 90% of the eligible population, will ensure that life returns to ‘normal’.

3. It is safe for all children as young as five to be vaccinated in order to reduce transmission.

4. Unvaccinated individuals are encouraging mutations leading to new Covid variants.

None of these messages are unequivocably supported by published research. 1 to 4 are all controversial.

1A. Research shows that transmissible viral load is similar between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v4.full.pdf

1B. Moreover research on real world data shows that vaccination rates do not correlate with infection rates.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10654-021-00808-7.pdf

2. It is very evident from overseas countries with high vaccination rates such as those in the EU and UK that current fourth waves of Covid are substantial.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41423-021-00779-5

3. Research shows that risks of myocarditis (heart inflammation) among the under twenties are high and pose a health risk which may have long-term consequences.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.30.21262866v1

4. A number of papers point to the role of ‘vaccines that allow transmission’ in the development of mutations, including:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.19.21262139v2

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2776039

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1002198

The present policies of government are creating division in our society that prides itself on fairness and equality.

There is now a two-tier system in which many individuals are being marginalised and hugely financially disadvantaged.

This is being done without any scientific certainty of safety or information.

The deficiencies in safety information are creating an impression that it is OK to blame safety-concerned unvaccinated individuals for risks that are not of their making.

The unvaccinated are not primary vectors of transmission.

This thoughtful essay discusses the origins and divisive effect that current policies are creating:

https://charleseisenstein.substack.com/p/mob-morality-and-the-unvaxxed

I hope you can take the time to absorb the implications of this letter personally.

My earlier open letter to The Rt. Hon. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, MPs and members of the media on this topic elicited no response.

No one can make safety concerns go away by ignoring them and then victimising those asking questions.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

A Time for Passion and a Cool Head

Guy Hatchard
-
0
A Time for Passion and a Cool Head

Yesterday I posted a piece revealing new revelations about the lab origin of coronavirus. Someone questioned whether this matters.

Yes, it does, whether one has chosen to be vaccinated or not.

The situation is clear, a diverse group of scientists, decision-makers, and commercial interests committed to a biotech future, created a virus and then profited immensely from a vaccine.

Five Million Have Died and Counting

True crime is avidly watched, this is true crime on a scale that matches the worst of history, but it is going on with little comment and no correction.

History matters, our continuity of memory of events and trends is essential to evaluate the present.

A climate of fear has been created that has polarised populations.

Fear has replaced clear thinking, while the reassurance of vaccination has enabled us to sink back into indifference to the bigger issues at stake.

Twenty years ago the world was aflame with opposition to bioengineered foods with good reason.

We have a symbiotic evolutionary relationship with our natural environment, including our foods, which has lasted for millions of years.

The delicate balance of the ecosphere including our physiology relies on the stability of this balance.

It is readily understandable that this needs to be protected.

Fast forward to today, we stand at a crossroads.

Do we go down the new path of biotechnology and nanotechnology whose end is unclear, but already clouded with justifiable fears, or do we stick to life as normal?

The choice is not binary, the answer lies in a third way.

The World, Our World is in Crisis

Those who would manipulate have realised that framing choices as A or B, is a convenient way to divide and conquer.

Politics lulls us into thinking we need to give our unconditional allegiance to one party or the other, despite the little difference between them.

Now the wolf is at the door, it is time to change gear.

The crises of climate change, of chronic ill health, of housing, of species extinction, of famine, of pollution, have multiplied.

It is universally realised that action is needed, but it is equally clear that the governments and commercial interests are biased towards their own limited interests to the exclusion of the greater good, and even to the exclusion of survival.

It may be time for those who can see the looming future to pool their resources, to create alliances for knowledge.

This may involve difficult choices, but now is the time to make those choices and prepare to create a better future.

Do not think the choice is whether to vaccinate or not.

The choice is whether to survive or not.

Do not go gentle into that dark night.

It is a time for common counsel.

What divides us is not important, what seeks to control us, to harm us, and limit us must be addressed.

It is a time for meditation and action.

Avoiding Forced Vaccination and Losing Your Job

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Avoiding Forced Vaccination and Losing Your Job

Avoiding forced vaccination and losing your job—Please share:

If you are being forced to Vax in order to keep your job, here’s a way to handle it. Legal letter as follows:

“I write with regard to the matter of potential covid vaccine and my desire to be fully informed and appraised of ALL facts before going ahead.

I’d be most grateful if you could please provide the following information, in accordance with statutory legal requirements and the NZ Bill of Rights.”:

1. Can you please advise the approved legal status of any vaccine and if it is experimental?

2. Can you please provide details and assurances that the vaccine has been fully, independently, and rigorously tested against control groups over a sufficient time period and the subsequent outcomes of those tests and the accompanying data have been peer reviewed by independent and recognised scientists?

3. Can you please advise the entire list of contents of the vaccine I am to receive and if any are toxic to the body?

4. Can you please fully advise of all the adverse reactions associated with this vaccine since its introduction?

5. Can you please confirm that the vaccine you are advocating is NOT experimental mRNA gene altering therapy?

6. Can you please confirm that I will not be under any duress from yourselves as my employers, in compliance with the Nuremberg Code and the NZ Bill of Rights?

7. Can you please advise me of the likely risk of fatality, should I be unfortunate to contract Covid 19 and the likelihood of recovery?

8. Can you please advise me if I were to experience any adverse reactions including subsequent death is the manufacturer of the vaccine liable?

If the manufacturer isn’t liable will the company I’m currently employed with be responsible & liable including ongoing support for my dependents as it is their request that I have the vaccine in order to carry on my employment?

Once I have received the above information in full and I am satisfied that there is NO threat to my health, I will be happy to accept your offer to receive the treatment, but with certain conditions – namely that:

1. You confirm in writing that I will suffer no harm.

2. Following acceptance of this, the offer must be signed by a fully qualified doctor who will take full legal and financial responsibility for any injuries occurring to myself, and/or from any interactions by authorized personnel regarding these procedures.

3. In the event that I should have to decline the offer of vaccination, please confirm that it will not compromise my position and that I will not suffer prejudice and discrimination as a result?

I would also advise that my inalienable human rights are reserved and this request is made without prejudice to common law.

How are Decisions About Prevention and Treatment Options Being Made

Guy Hatchard
-
0
How are Decisions About Prevention and Treatment Options Being Made

Where and how are decisions being taken about prevention and treatment options for Covid 19?

In 2014 a new international regulatory body was convened.

The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities—ICMRA—comprises the Heads of the regulatory authorities of countries around the world, including the New Zealand regulator Medsafe, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) as an observer.

ICMRA does not have the sanction of any governments, it is a bureaucratic alliance of medical regulators who enjoy close relationships with the global pharmaceutical industry.

It operates a shared database among all its members which it uses to harmonise and control medical choices amongst countries ensuring that all governments will receive the same advice from their regulatory bodies. It aims to control use of all human medicine including the new genetic biologic medicines and vaccines.

The ICMRA website states its strategic aims:

Regulatory convergence, alignment, and standards development of all human medicine, which will lead to harmonisation of global regulations.

Regulatory cooperation, information- and work-sharing allowing controls on products in any country to be rapidly globalised.

It further states:

During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) is acting as a forum to support strategic coordination and international cooperation among global medicine regulatory authorities.

The aim of these activities is to expedite and streamline the development, authorisation, and availability of COVID-19 treatments and vaccines worldwide.

ICMRA members from around the world have jointly developed a statement to answer questions and reassure people about the oversight of COVID-19 vaccines.

Despite their emergency approval before safety tests have been completed, this statement explains vaccines undergo robust scientific evaluation to determine their safety, efficacy, and quality.

Through a single body, powerful commercial interests are able to work behind the scenes to hijack and harmonise the global approach to medical regulation in every country.

They are able to control the information available to governments and limit the public message.

So when you hear from the government that Medsafe (or the equivalent regulator in your country) has approved their policies as best practice, you now know that information came to the regulator via their connection an extra-governmental body located in cloud space, subject to commercial influence, that is not accountable to anyone.

1...444546Page 45 of 46

© hatchardreport.com. All rights reserved. Dr. Guy Hatchard is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles