Last week a school child died of a sudden medical event in New Zealand while running, and 12 thousand miles away, the 24 year old captain of a hurling team in Ireland collapsed mid game and died soon after.
The New Zealand school principal said:
This is absolutely tragic, it’s devastating. We’ve got very sad students and staff, and we are doing everything we can to support them.
In Ireland, the president called the death an “inestimable loss” to his loved ones and the local community. The Taoiseach (Irish PM) also expressed his sympathies, saying that he was “shocked and saddened” to hear about the hurler’s passing.
They join a very long and growing list of apparently healthy people, young and old, who have died suddenly and unexpectedly over the last 18 months.
Three years ago, this would have been unusual, and much commented upon, but today few are asking questions. The articles in Stuff and the BBC disappeared off the front pages within a very short time.
Are Authorities Exercising Their Right to Remain Silent on Sudden Deaths
There will be some medical explanation offered to bereaved parents. Legitimate privacy concerns will ensure that this is kept private. No doubt it will be agreed that they are tragic deaths, but possibly unavoidable, for which no one is at fault. The school principal says that she is doing everything she can. The Taoiseach professed himself shocked.
No one can point the finger here without information, but it is not possible to ignore a hard fact: sudden deaths are happening too many times, considerably more times than in the past, meanwhile the authorities appear to be exercising their right to remain silent.
Given accumulating evidence of vaccine harm, it might be a great relief to everyone in the medical profession, the media, and government if the pandemic simply whimpers to an end as appears to be happening in the UK leaving no questions answered and no apology required. But there is a question of justice.
The NZ Crimes Act, clause 155—Duty of persons doing dangerous acts—says:
Every one who undertakes…to administer…medical treatment, or to do any other lawful act, the doing of which is or may be dangerous to life, is under a legal duty to have and to use reasonable knowledge, skill, and care in doing any such act, and is criminally responsible for the consequences of omitting…to discharge that duty.
The emphasis is on knowledge and care. Was this always diligently exercised during the pandemic, or have the authorities sometimes looked the other way as new evidence came to light?
Repeated Exposure to Covid Spike Protein is Teaching the Immune System to Ignore the Spike Protein
In June, a paper was published in the journal Science titled; Immune boosting by B.1.1.529 (Omicron) depends on previous SARS-CoV-2 exposure
This technical paper has had over 250,000 views. It suggests that repeated Covid vaccination has an effect similar to repeated injections designed to acclimatise a person with allergies to small quantities of the allergen (such as bee venom). Eventually, the immune system learns to ignore the venom and thus escapes the excessive and damaging immune system reaction to stings.
In the same way, repeated exposure to the Covid spike protein in vaccines is teaching the immune system to ignore the spike protein. The immune system no longer bothers to fight Covid off. Thereby boosters are not helping us to avoid Covid, they are leaving us more vulnerable to reinfection. The conclusion is that repeated boosters should be avoided.
I term the publication of a paper like this as: apology lite—boosters are not useful, but never mind it is not too bad—you’ll probably get over it as long as you stop taking the jabs.
Of course, even this sort of useful information is not passing through the hands of government, politicians of all parties, media, and medical administrators and onto the public. Given their high profile promotion of vaccines and mandates, it is possibly way too embarrassing for them.
Real and Serious Dangers Associated With Covid Vaccination
The real problem arises because this Science paper, and most Covid papers, seldom tell you that there are other real and serious dangers associated with Covid vaccination—that would be vaccine heresy and might result in censorship.
Risks that might and do result in illness and sometimes death. Health conditions that may never go away or even get worse, including potentially fatal increased incidence of blood clots, neurological conditions, heart disease, and cancers (according to 2021 US military data and US insurance data).
These appear to be contributing to record levels of all cause mortality affecting all ages.
The German government came clean two weeks ago and admitted the prevalence of health problems was significant, serious, and life changing, but they stopped short of pausing public vaccinations. That might have constituted an admission of guilt.
Are those in government, the media, and the medical profession referencing the full scope of science journal publishing? Are they keeping count of the unusual extent and character of health outcomes? If they admitted doing so, they might be forced to admit complicity in a crime. A crime of such unprecedented proportions that bids to defy belief.
Is any particular sudden death related to vaccination in any way? In many cases we don’t have sufficient information and therefore can’t speculate, but the number and circumstances of recent sudden death cases appears to be too high to ignore. Two weeks ago we reported the sudden death of six Canadian doctors.
Has the government contributed to a public health tragedy by failing to admit that there are serious risks from Covid vaccination for every age group and few if any measurable benefits for those under 50?
It appears there is a discussion to be had, if we are ever permitted to do so, and there may be a case to answer in a court of law where every aspect of the evidence can be presented and cross examined.
