Longer term follow up of children experiencing chest pain following Pfizer mRNA vaccination finds persistent heart abnormalities

The Czars of epidemiology advise the government to continue mandates

A follow up study conducted at the Seattle Children’s Hospital of children suffering myocarditis following their second dose of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was published in the Journal of Pediatrics on 25 March 2022.

The study followed up 16 male children, with an average age of 15 years, 3 to 8 months after their initial diagnosis with myocarditis within a short time frame following mRNA vaccination.

The authors used Electrocardiograms and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) to examine abnormalities in the heart such as myocardial scarring, fibrosis, strain, and reduced ventricular muscle extension which can be associated with reduced capacity to pump blood and increased risk of heart attack.

The authors found that although there was some measure of resolution after 3 – 8 months most subjects still had some persistent abnormalities.

“Although (initial) symptoms (such as chest pain, and exercise intolerance) were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment (solely with NSAIDS such as ibuprofen), we demonstrated persistence of abnormal findings on CMR at (3-8 months) follow up in most patients, albeit with improvement in extent of LGE (a measure of the heart’s capacity to pump efficiently).”

The authors warned:

“The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis. A meta-analysis including 8 studies found that presence of LGE is a predictor of all cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalization, recurrent acute myocarditis and requirement for mechanical circulatory support.”

For those who wish to review a detailed evaluation of this study by a medical expert, you can watch this video

Wider implications for New Zealand

The latest Medsafe Adverse Effects Report #41 lists 12,000 people who have experienced chest discomfort and 6,000 shortness of breath (all ages) following mRNA vaccination, both classic symptoms of myocarditis. The authors of the small study reported above concluded:

“In the cohort of adolescents with COVID-19 mRNA vaccine-related myopericarditis, a large portion have persistent LGE abnormalities, raising concerns for potential longer-term effects.”

It is clear that little has been done in New Zealand to follow up those affected by adverse effects. Many reporting to EDs or GPs with chest pain, tachycardia, or shortness of breath have been told that everything will be OK without clinical assessment. In many cases these symptoms were not even registered with CARM.

Even though the Seattle study had few participants, it red flags the possibility of subsequent cardiac events. It raises the possibility that sub clinical adverse effects of mRNA vaccination may have serious longer term impacts on health.

Until now these have been classified as non-serious in NZ. Persistent reports of cardiac events in the weeks and months following mRNA vaccination among ostensibly fit and healthy people of all age groups and genders, but especially men, can no longer be ignored or dismissed as unrelated. They need to be investigated.

This underlines the fact that the Pfizer mRNA vaccination roll out has been undertaken in the absence of long term follow up testing which often requires the use of sophisticated equipment such as CMR and MRI.

Moreover heart disease is not the only category of serious illness whose incidence may be increased by mRNA vaccination as other recent studies suggest. Possible long term adverse effects include cancer, kidney and liver disease, and neurological conditions. A recent court-ordered document release shows Pfizer and probably our government is aware of cases.

But our government is still persisting with advertising suggesting that mRNA vaccination is safe and effective. This is not supported by research. mRNA vaccination comes with some serious risks. Moreover the government was well aware of the risks from the start.

In an internal document released under OIA dated 10th February 2021 and signed by Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health and Chris Hipkins, Covid Response Minister discussing provisions for the vaccination of border workers, point 57 says:

“current data suggests severe adverse reactions are less than 1.1%”

Following 10 million injections, as we have had in NZ, that would amount to more than 100,000 adverse reactions (a figure not inconsistent with the grossly under reported 55,000 adverse reactions registered with CARM).

Did either Ashley Bloomfield, Jacinda Ardern, or Chris Hipkins ever hint to the public or the media that this was the expected outcome?

No they did not. They told the public the vaccine was completely safe and effective. They hid facts. More than this, Jacinda Ardern deleted the 33,000 reports of adverse effects that were posted on her FB page. She gaslighted the public.

Shocking Deficiencies in Advice Given to Government

In the light of the study at Seattle Children’s Hospital and other recent findings of potential long term health issues associated with mRNA vaccination, we will now look at the very recent official advice given to the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

A letter dated 13 March 2022 has been sent by the Strategic COVID-19 Public Health Advisory Group (the David Skegg committee) to The Hon Dr. Ayesha Verrall Associate Minister of Public Health.

Read or download the above-mentioned letter by clicking here >>> Strategic COVID-19 Public Health Advisory Group

The letter is entitled Vaccine Mandates and aims to review the government’s strategy for minimising harms caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, to health, society and the economy. The Committee assured the Minister: “we have been able to take a completely fresh look at the evidence.”

The signatories to the letter are Dr. David Skegg an epidemiologist, Dr. Maia Brewerton a clinical immunologist, allergist, and immunopathologist, Professor Philip Hill an epidemiologist and public health expert, Dr. Ella Iosua a biostatistician, Professor David Murdoch a clinical microbiologist, Dr. Nikki Turner an immunologist interested in preventive child health. All are vaccine advocates.

Point 29 calls for more measures to encourage children to be vaccinated.

Point 12 of their letter asserts: “As we now deal with a large Omicron outbreak, vaccination is undoubtedly reducing the numbers of people who are becoming seriously ill and require hospital treatment.”

However current NZ data discussed in articles at the Hatchard Report reveal that the rates of hospitalisation are equivalent for vaxxed and unvaxxed.

Not a single scientific reference is included in this letter.

Not a single reference is made to adverse effects of vaccination (currently running at 30-50 times higher than that of any previous vaccine).

Not a single reference is made to any need for informed consent prior to vaccination. The theme running throughout the letter is a need to normalise the use of vaccination mandates when they are needed in New Zealand going into the future.

The right of employers to enforce vaccine mandates is described as common.

High vaccination rates are said to reduce absenteeism and the collapse of public services and commercial businesses.

The letter admits that the protection provided by the Covid-19 vaccines wanes after a few months and says the term booster should be avoided. It recommends the needed number of mRNA vaccinations should be described as a course, and raises the imminent desirability of a fourth vaccine dose for at least some people.

Point 28 says: “For some cases, it would be appropriate for vaccination to be a condition for new employment.” This clause recommends the broad use and normalisation of vaccine requirements in New Zealand for many illnesses and in many service sectors.

Unaccountably the letter says “Encouraging vaccination in the general population was not one of the specific objectives of vaccine mandates.” It also says that vaccine hesitancy has been much less in New Zealand than other countries and that people “have been prepared to accept redeployment and redundancy”. In essence denying the obvious coercion involved in mandates.

The letter recommends that mandates continue in use for health care workers, aged and disabled caregivers, corrections workers, and border staff. There will be a review in six months time.

The overall content of the letter appears to suggest that vaccines have been the key element ensuring low Covid-19 incidence. It completely fails to discuss the obvious point that this success has been achieved through border controls and contact tracing, NOT mRNA vaccination.

Conclusion

The long term health effects of mRNA vaccination are becoming more obvious through published research findings. Meanwhile the government advisors have their heads in the sand.

Their careers have been built upon vaccination and now it seems they are prepared to ignore the obvious deficiencies of mRNA vaccination to save the government. One Chicago professor commented this week:

“New Zealand science is circling the drain”

This week we were subjected to a piece of theatre that transported us all into an uncertain future.

The problem is that for two years Jacinda Ardern, backed up by government-funded saturation advertising, has been educating the public that Pfizer mRNA vaccination is completely safe and fully effective. MSM has backed up Jacinda to the hilt.

This one-sided propaganda has created a counterrational outlook.

Light at the End of the Tunnel?

Meanwhile, in a parallel universe, some sense of contrition is creeping in at the edges. The Ministry of Health has announced it is conducting a survey of those affected by myocarditis and pericarditis.

To participate you will need to have registered an adverse reaction at CARM and seen a physician.

If you are affected by symptoms of myocarditis following vaccination such as:

• chest pains
• shortness of breath
• irregular heartbeat
• excessive fatigue
• swelling in the legs
• joint pain
• fever
• headache
• heart attack
• stroke, etc.

and haven’t registered with CARM already, I suggest you do so right away.

Please also alert any affected friends immediately.

You should consider registering a copy of your submission with NZDSOS. For full details of the Ministry of Health survey go to:

https://www.health.govt.nz/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-pfizer-vaccine-side-effects-and-reactions/covid-19-vaccine-myocarditis-and-pericarditis-study

I note that in a survey such as the one projected by the Ministry of Health, the results will be skewed by the absence of submissions from those who have already died as a result.

The prestigious Mayo Clinic lists heart attack, heart failure, stroke, blood clots, sudden cardiac death, and rapid irregular heart rhythms as complications of myocarditis.

If you know of such cases subsequent to vaccination, I suggest that you contact both Ministry of Health and NZDSOS to ask how their details may be added to the final result of the survey.

Two Worlds Apart

We can be forgiven for thinking that Ardern’s is a counterrational world. One part of the government continues to tell us that mRNA vaccination is completely safe and effective, while another part of the government is starting a survey to identify and monitor those whose heart health has been adversely affected.

Meanwhile, the government has just announced it will appeal the recent court ruling which struck down their vaccination mandates for police.

So the Ministry of Health is wondering what their long-term prognosis might be, whilst the government is going to court to insist that the police continue to be required to risk long-term cardiac damage.

Truth and Reconciliation is Needed

In other developments this week, the government’s announcement that vaccination passes are ending has led to a measure of confusion.

Some of Jacinda’s followers are apparently feeling cheated and betrayed. There has been an outburst of hate speech against unvaccinated individuals.

Someone posted a tweet referring to TVNZ news host Hilary Barry speaking last year when she referred to all unvaccinated people as unwashed ‘feral’ (a particularly offensive epithet in New Zealand) members of a street gang.

As a result, Barry’s Twitter followers reprised their approval and erupted in praise. Someone called for the death penalty for all unvaccinated. Some who tweeted dissent were blocked by Barry.

This morning when I looked, death threats against the unvaccinated were still up on some Twitter feeds of vocal Barry supporters. Some called for unvaccinated people to have their children removed into state care.

In the past, Barry has also called for unvaccinated people to be transported to a remote island (a suggestion that did lead to online threats against Barry).

After a complaint, the Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) found in Barry’s favour.

It is particularly concerning when remarks seek to dehumanise people. It is the same sort of attitude that allowed Mexican children to be held in cages at the US border without sufficient general public outcry.

The use of the word “feral” is moving towards the classification of some people as undeserving of their place in society.

Something that Jacinda Ardern appeared to condone when she admitted that her vaccination mandates were creating a two tier society.

If you condone threats against anyone on either side of the argument as the BSA did, it can only get worse.

The situation will only get resolved when Jacinda Ardern publicly tells her adoring followers that a ‘mistake’ has been made.

mRNA vaccination is actually not measurably ‘effective’ against Omicron and it can cause serious adverse effects.

When will Ardern come clean?

We hope Covid science journal publishing and political rhetoric will have to merge at some point.

A visit to the Dentist?

Until misinformation is acknowledged we are going to be living in a very strange world.

Yesterday, following the removal of vaccine passes, my daughter called up our dentist to book some much needed dental work for the family. The conversation went much as follows:

My daughter: Now that vaccine passes are no longer required, I need to book an appointment. We are unvaccinated, but we have had Covid so we are immune.

Receptionist: If we decide it is possible for you to make an appointment, you would have to come right at the end of the working day as we will have to clean the surgery after your visit.

My daughter: Don’t you clean the surgery after each appointment?

Receptionist: Yes, but we will need to complete a deep clean after you.

They haven’t yet agreed to make an appointment for us. We are possibly considered feral gang members, too unclean for their refined sensibilities.

A large part of the public have become addicted to the false sense of safety associated with vaccine passes. They have cemented a kind of group superiority that has historical parallels.

They have normalised a scapegoat psychology that falsely places the blame for everything on a class of people who want to maintain their health naturally. It is going to take a long time to return to planet earth.

Guy Hatchard has written a book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet.

Refocusing National Energies to Prevent Recurrence and Assist Those Affected.

As an end to mandates makes its slow way out of the starting gate, it is time to take stock and begin to remediate the severe damage that has been done to our nation and our world, its scientific, medical, social, and economic institutions and to individual citizens.

The Hatchard Report wants to reiterate that both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated have been disadvantaged by disinformation, discrimination, and medical misadventure.

In fact, governments distracted their populations from needed debate by dividing us into vaxxed and unvaxxed—characterised as the ‘saved’ and the ‘dangerous’. 

They created this strong distinction without any adequate scientific basis.

Their fear narrative overhyped the dangers of Covid infection—the mean age of deaths was in fact similar to average life expectancy.

The mRNA vaccines did not stop transmission, rapidly waned in effectiveness, and caused unprecedented rates of adverse effects. 

To move forward from this, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated will need to take common cause.

scientific debate involving rational discussion has been from the outset suppressed and outlawed

PART ONE

The Need for Rational Science

We need to recognise that a scientific debate involving rational discussion has been from the outset suppressed and outlawed.

Journal publishing on Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccination now runs into tens of thousands of articles. The data reported and their conclusions need to begin to inform changed government policy.

We are now fully aware that in the Omicron environment, mRNA vaccination has virtually no impact on transmission, infection, and hospitalisation rates.

It is also clear that excess all-cause deaths have risen in association with vaccination rates in a number of countries including ours. Unusually this has affected working-age individuals at an unprecedented rate.

We have discussed that a paper published in May 2021 indicated that mRNA vaccination causes a drop in T cell production. T cells are our first line of immune defence. 

It is also clear that contrary to initial expectations, the genetic sequences in mRNA vaccines are relatively mobile and can affect diverse organ systems in the physiology, interfering with their functions.

The Hatchard Report and others have covered and referenced many of these findings in depth during the last few months.

The main point we want to emphasise here is that although Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccine have unique specific effects which distinguish them from each other, they also have a great many toxic effects in common.

For example, high rates of cardiac events. There are long-term impacts of both on health, but their true extent remains largely uninvestigated, and in fact, will only be known as time passes.

Reorienting Our Health Service Response

Here in New Zealand and in other countries, health services need to capture an accurate picture of the health impacts and provide appropriate treatment and compensation for those affected.

In mainstream media, it continues to be unacceptable to associate high rates of cardiac events and strokes with vaccination.

Unprecedented rates of health events among athletes, public figures, and the general population are being variously dismissed as due to stress and described as a ‘Warne anxiety effect’ or a ‘holiday heart syndrome’ etc.

This is patently absurd. The refusal of health authorities in many countries, including our own, to countenance what is becoming obvious and the subject of speculation needs to be rectified.

Accurate surveys of adverse events following vaccination and Covid-19 infection need to be instituted.

Up until now, in most countries, adverse effects reports have been collected through passive voluntary systems leading to massive underreporting. A recent survey of 4,000 representative subjects in Israel reported a disturbing picture—50% of mRNA vaccine recipients who responded experienced adverse effects. 

The incidence rate, severity, and duration of long Covid following Omicron is also unknown.

Any studies need to take account of the fact that people will experience adverse outcomes as a result of both vaccination and Covid infection, their relative importance should be assessed through proper selection of experimental groups: unvaxxed with covid, unvaxxed without covid, vaxxed (1,2, and 3 doses) with covid, and vaxxed without covid.

Otherwise, the complicating effects of mRNA vaccination on Covid outcomes will be underestimated.

• National rates of heart disease and stroke among all age groups, known common outcomes of both vaccination and Covid-19, need to be monitored in real time, rather than reporting at a three year lag as is happening at present.
• Cancer rates need to be monitored. Mutagenic cancer-causing events could become more common when T cell function is suppressed, as it is immediately after mRNA vaccination.

Action Step—Assisting Those Affected

Most importantly, we need to make renewed efforts to identify and assist those affected. 

Due to lack of information, misinformation, or in some cases indifference, GPs and hospital doctors have dismissed many serious medical events as unrelated to vaccination.

Thus people suffering strokes, cardiac events, occurence or resurgence of cancers, and a wide range of other conditions have been left in the dark concerning possible causes.

As such, they have been unaware of the possibility of making insurance and ACC claims. Nor in many cases, have families been able to make rational sense of sudden debilitating health impacts. 

Qualified personnel volunteering at NZDSOS, VFF, and the Health Forum NZ have for more than a year been dialoguing with those affected who have been alert to a possible connection.

No cooperative investigation has been undertaken by Medsafe and the Ministry of Health who have thereby ensured that they remain in blissful ignorance of the true extent of adverse effects.

This is a scandal that needs to be rectified immediately. 

The content and character of government Covid messaging needs to change radically. It should encourage people to come forward, whose health has been affected since the mRNA vaccination rollout began.

A demonstrably independent team should be set up, dedicated to creating a reliable statistical picture and treatment system. This should cover both the vaccine injured and long Covid sufferers.

PART TWO

The Likely Origin of Covid Needs to Influence Our Approach

There is another vital and cogent reason why the vaxxed and unvaxxed have a common cause.

It is likely that both Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccines have similar origins and certain that they have similar effects.

Although we may never know the exact sequence of events that led to the pandemic, there are many reasons to suppose that Covid-19 originated in a laboratory:

• Twelve genetic sequences in the spike protein were known to laboratories before the pandemic. The odds against their appearance together in a specific functioning order have been estimated by some to be more than a trillion to one. One of these sequences reportedly originated in the HIV pathogen, another was the subject of a Moderna patent—sources too diverse to suddenly merge together in a natural setting.
• Chinese virologist Shi Zengli working at the Wuhan Virology Lab, is now known to have been conducting gain of function research funded by the US government. Before the pandemic, she created novel pathogens capable of infecting humans that involved the insertion of unusual sequences similar to those found in the Covid-19 spike protein. Her successful endeavours are the subject of papers she published prior to 2020.
• The high mutation rate and apparent instability of the Covid-19 pathogen that has led to the formation of over 30,000 variants and to radical changes in its symptoms as it mutated, indicates that Covid-19 was probably not a naturally occurring relatively stable variant in an animal population. Moreover the unique spike protein configuration has not been found in animal viruses despite a vigorous search.
• The determination of the Chinese government right from the start to completely eradicate Covid-19, indicates that they possibly knew something about its origins and the dangers it posed. It is possible that they had foreknowledge of the exact nature, purpose, and dangers of the gain of function experiments being conducted at Wuhan.

We now know that the highly unusual Covid spike protein has a strongly toxic effect on the human physiology both from Covid infection and following mRNA vaccination. 

The mRNA vaccine teaches human cells to produce the novel spike protein in order to stimulate an immune response.

Following mRNA vaccination, our body creates spike protein sequences in high concentrations, millions if not billions of times higher than the exposure you might receive from an air borne Covid infection caused by someone coughing or sneezing.

In some cases, the physiology produces or harbours spike protein for months after both vaccination and Covid infection where it is able to continue to adversely affect health.

Action Step—Biotechnology Experimentation Should be Paused

Biotech experimentation is very risky. It has likely created a lethal disease and certainly a lethal vaccine, both of which have had global impacts on health running to millions of casualties.

We must insist on a rational debate about these topics and action to curb laboratory work, otherwise, exotic biotechnology experimentation will continue and proliferate. 

Already pharmaceutical PR is calling for more investment in biotechnology to ‘avert’ future threats. A claim that should be dismissed as absurd. The idea that biotechnology is curing disease is the stuff of myths.

In actuality, as we have just experienced, it is introducing lethal and random risks affecting genetic stability and immune function. This should have been well known through the results of earlier studies on gene therapy outcomes.

Due to government indifference to enforcing ethical safeguards of experimentation, their lack of attention to science publishing, and their reliance on the deceptively comforting use of the word ‘vaccine’ to describe a novel and ineffective biotechnology intervention, we are facing an ongoing global public health crisis of unprecedented proportions.

The implication is that biotechnology experimentation should be paused around the world, otherwise inevitable laboratory accidents will occur again, possibly with even more devastating consequences.

Guy Hatchard has written a book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet.

The text below is an approximate transcript of this video.

Mark Steyn

Have you had your fourth booster yet?

You know, they say sure, you’ll still get the COVID. But don’t worry, it’ll be much milder you won’t be going into the ICU.

There doesn’t seem to be a lot of science behind that assertion. And there’s mounting evidence to the contrary.

A Polish study has found that mRNA vaccines may be damaging brain cells and immune systems.

I talked a couple of weeks ago that they’re causing an uptick in chilblains. Chilblains, you can probably handle. The death of your brain cells and the collapse of your immune system is slightly worse news than chill Blaine’s.

Meanwhile, a German study of all-cause mortality has found that since the vaccinations got going, young and middle-aged persons are dying in larger numbers.

Dr. Guy Hatchard has been writing about this at the conservative woman website for some time. And he joins us now from New Zealand.

Guy the big takeaway from this, which I think is quite extraordinary, is that in 2020 when the COVID started raging, it didn’t actually cause excess mortality that year, because most of the people who died were over the average life expectancy in countries like the UK.

So for example, the average age of COVID death was at 8.5 years or whatever it was. Then they start vaccinating everybody and suddenly we have a huge uptick in deaths of the middle aged and the young and we’re getting used to like celebrity, there’s a spate of celebrity 52-year-olds, I noticed having fatal heart attacks. Something odd is going on, is it not?

Dr. Guy Hatchard

Absolutely it is. The paper yesterday here New Zealand Herald, greetings from The Hobbit Kingdom Mark, the headline Most COVID Patients in the Omicron Outbreak are Vaccinated, but that is no reason to doubt vaccine benefits.

And they also ran an article saying that the huge uptick in cardiac events, they dubbed it the WARNE effect. They said middle-aged men are getting anxiety because they think they may be similar to Shane Warne, and they’re having heart attacks because of anxiety. And that’s what happens when the government

Mark Steyn

Is that actually is that actually true? Are people seriously arguing that Shane Warne died of anxiety – who was a brilliant cricketer, and I regret that I’ll never actually see him do some of those incredible things he did in the 90s.

But people are actually arguing now that this is completely, this is some sort of anxiety, general anxiety that he died of.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

People are doing anything, but admit that something has gone terribly wrong. If our government here for example, was to admit that there was, there had been a wrong turn, you know, we’ve had two years of saturation advertising, you can’t turn on the television or go to social media without being told that mRNA vaccines are completely safe and effective.

And people have become brainwashed and the government has curated this, they paid for it. They paid the media. And now they’re faced with the fact that it actually doesn’t work.

Now, we actually had COVID We’ve had COVID free in New Zealand for two years. Now we have COVID. The vaccinated and unvaccinated are getting it about equally as far as the relative population numbers are concerned.

So it would be political suicide for Ardern to admit for two years that they had been pulling the wool over our eyes and there’s no doubt that that happened. Absolutely deliberately.

The government swept the side effects under the carpet. We had 2000 excess deaths in our very small country during the time that the vaccine was rolled out.

Mark Steyn

Yeah, that’s and that’s very significant. As you say in a population the size of New Zealand. You can see similar things, I think in the most totally vaccinated communities on Earth.

In Gibraltar, for example, and in Israel, they’re still saying though, like the United States, for example, is still saying you’re gonna get need to get the fourth booster.

Right now is there actually any scientific justification for giving anybody another shot of this stuff?

Dr. Guy Hatchard

We’ve known for a long time that every time you take one of these injections, the immune system gets suppressed. In fact, my best friend that I went to university with died from immune suppression.

It’s been known from; there was a paper published, for example, in May 2021, analysing this issue, and now we know a lot more than that. So why is this happening?

Well, pharmaceutical and biotech companies are really directly plumbed into governments, they’re plumbed into medicines regulators, there’s this International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, the UK is a member is New Zealand as a member.

And that’s a direct line into pharmaceutical propaganda and distortion of evidence. And this is driving government opinion. I’m just Jacinda Ardern has famously said the government should be your only source of information.

Well, her only source of information is pharmaceutical companies. And that, you know, I don’t like to use the word, conspiracy, but it’s a coalition of information systems, mainstream media systems, governments, and biotech companies who are ideologically committed to a biotechnology future.

And that’s a really dangerous future.

We’re facing a different kind of war together. We’re facing a title war, a temple biological war.

Mark Steyn

Why do you think in the normal course of events, there should be room for a diversity of opinion of this. Now, you’ve written about, for example, these German and Polish studies, these are not countries that we think of as fringe countries full of Kooks who’ve cooked this thing up.

Why do they not get more play? Why two years in, is the media still so invested in the official narrative, and only that

Dr. Guy Hatchard

There’s a lot of money riding on it, I think. You know, Biotechnology is seen as the future. And that runs through the whole political and economic system that we have.

And if, if this, if it was to get out, for example, and be accepted, which it should be, that the disease was caused by, it was created in a lab, and the vaccine is created in a lab, people would start to realise that we’re facing something that we’ve never faced before, which is indiscriminate war.

BioTE biotech war is, is a kind of what it’s called the psychology of the serial killer. Any victim will do. Friend or foe. And the more the merrier. Because these diseases, these pathogens do not distinguish between people and countries.

This is a frightening prospect, were and it has to be stopped. But stopping that would change a whole system, which is predicated on the technological evolution of medicine. Whereas in fact, you know, 95% of our health is actually what we eat and what we do how we conduct ourselves.

Mark Steyn

Yeah. No, you’re absolutely right about that. And that’s why I find the most fascinating thing, the stark contrast between excess mortality. That’s as basic an indicator as you can get.

And the fact that when the COVID was rampaging around, there was ultimately no increase in excess mortality because it targeted, basically the very old, then we switch things up.

We come up with these vaccines, and we insist on doing something that’s never been done before where we say basically, everybody on the planet has to get this stuff injected into their arm, including people who are at no risk whatsoever, such as people in young middle age, in the flower of youth, or even primary school children.

So we insist that all of those people have to get jabbed with this stuff. And there is a discernible uptick in excess mortality. And yet, we’re not permitted to talk about it.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

Absolutely. You can’t go there, you can’t talk about it whatsoever. And that is being curated by governments and being suppressed by media. And it’s not a rational argument.

I think one thing we have to realise Mark that we’re not involved in a rational argument here. It’s not a question of sitting down with someone and saying, let’s look at the science because I was in a position at the start here of corresponding with people who were advising the government.

And when I started to raise some doubts, and say, well, look the side effects don’t look good, then the conversation finished. And it was a point of faith that the vaccine was a standalone solution.

And this has been a point of faith in an increasingly, kind of commercially orientated medical system, that vaccination is the standalone solution.

Whereas in fact, the central underpinning factors of health are, what we eat, how we exercise, how well we sleep, how well we, you know, conduct ourselves. So we enjoy and we’re not stressed, these other real factors of health.

I suggested right from the start here. I said to the government, we have to go ahead and have a programme to help people improve their health habits, but that was completely rejected. No, we’re going to go with vaccination.

Mark Steyn

Yeah, we, for example, obesity is one of the factors, the most serious underlying conditions if you’re 40 pounds overweight, or whatever. That’s more determinant of how you’re going to handle COVID than anything.

But what I can’t understand now is why there must be discussion of some of this at the highest levels in government. And yet governments around the world, in Canada, for example, you can’t get on a train unless you’ve been vaccinated.

So you’re stuck where you are, you can’t take a train from Montreal to Toronto unless you’ve got proof of your vaccination status. How can they still insist on that? Given A what happened with the Omicron? So we’ve seen it makes no difference and B what these the disturbing questions these studies are raising.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

It’s a form of hubris. People have started to play God.

I think you can see this in politics is that your last guest was talking about this, that people really believe in themselves and their authority. Our whole system of having stakeholders has disappeared.

Historically, democracy had stakeholders. And it dates right back to King John and the Magna Carta when he had to, instead of he had to rule with the Barons instead of over them.

And we have had scientists, we have had people in medicine and so on. And the government has moved away from that model. They no longer have stakeholders, they play it more like a reality TV game where there’s only one winner and he tells every way he gets all the money and he tells everyone what to do.

And, this kind of psychology is wrapped up with it. Plus, there’s this idea that has been sold to everyone that biotechnology is going to cure every disease. And this is the big lie.

Look at the research. It’s highly mutagenic. It’s the gene therapy that has been huge over the last 30 years. It’s not working.

Mark Steyn

Now, that’s a very good point. And it’s good of you to remind us of Magna Carta, we need to get some of these guys into a big baggy field off the River Thames and do that to them all over again.

Thank you very much Guy.

We’re gonna stay on this and we will watch we will read what you write and we will watch for other studies from Germany and Poland and such places.

A new preprint study conducted in Poland and published at bioRxiv investigates the effect of mRNA vaccine on glial cells in vitro (outside the physiology). Its conclusions point to possible effects of mRNA vaccines on crucial brain functions.

Glial cells or neuroglia, are non-neuronal cells in the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal column and the peripheral nervous system, that do not produce electrical impulses.

They maintain homeostasis and form the white fatty coating called myelin which protects axons—the electrical communication pathways between neurons.

Glial cells have several main functions in the brain including:

1. to surround neurons and hold them in place;
2. to supply nutrients and oxygen to neurons;
3. to insulate one neuron from another;
4. to destroy pathogens and remove dead neurons.
5. to protect the integrity of the blood-brain barrier
6. to facilitate neurotransmission and synaptic connections
7. to support physiological processes like breathing

Glial cells have far more cellular diversity and functions than neurons, and glial cells can respond to and manipulate neurotransmission in many ways.

Additionally, glial cells can affect both the preservation and consolidation of memories and are understood to be involved in cognitive processes.

The authors of the paper were mainly engaged in demonstrating the effectiveness of new RAMAN imaging technology for use in the investigation of alterations in biochemical pathways associated with cancer development.

However, their research unexpectedly revealed a range of effects of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine on mitochondria which amount to reductions in immune responses by glial cells which normally operate to support the immunity and functioning of the brain.

The authors conclude:

“We observed the effect of the mRNA vaccine on biodistribution of different chemical components, particularly cytochrome c, in the specific organelles of human brain glial cells: nucleus, mitochondria, lipid droplets, cytoplasm, rough endoplasmatic reticulum and membrane.

“We showed that mRNA vaccine (Pfizer) changes mitochondria by downregulation of cytochrome c resulting in lower effectiveness of respiration (oxidative phosphorylation) and lower ATP production. It can lead to lower immune system response.”

The authors further conclude that alterations in lipid (fat) production at the mitochondrial membrane are consistent with changes normally associated with increased aggressiveness of brain cancers and cell death.

This is a highly technical paper which is explained in a video here.

The study was conducted outside the brain in vitro (cellular research in vivo, inside the brain, is beyond present technical means) so its conclusions are subject to caution.

Moreover, for the same reasons, we do not know how much, or if, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine penetrates into the brain. The study is also a preprint, which means it has not yet undergone extensive peer review although it has been judged suitable by bioRxiv for public release and comment.

Nevertheless its conclusions are highly concerning. They are consistent with other studies showing that the Pfizer mRNA degrades immune response and they indicate the need for further research in this direction.

We have previously written that insufficient information is available about the effect of mRNA vaccine on higher human functions.

Most of all, this study confirms that the introduction of mRNA vaccines was rushed without sufficient safety testing of long term and broader spectrum secondary effects.

It also confirms that the introduction of active genetic sequences mRNA into the human physiology can have serious effects on stability (homeostasis) and mutagenesis through reduced immune capability.

Molecular and electrical pathways in the brain are tightly controlled, energised, and protected through gene-based functions. Interference with gene function can have multiple unexpected outcomes as happened here to brain cells in vitro.

The study authors imply that there may be accelerated death of glial cells whose functions, listed at the start of this article, support crucial brain processes.

This study underlines how far removed the global Covid pandemic response has been from a precautionary approach. Our government should take note.

Launching novel genetic technologies in a hurry without adequate testing can result in uncontrolled serious adverse outcomes.