Refocusing National Energies to Prevent Recurrence and Assist Those Affected.

As an end to mandates makes its slow way out of the starting gate, it is time to take stock and begin to remediate the severe damage that has been done to our nation and our world, its scientific, medical, social, and economic institutions and to individual citizens.

The Hatchard Report wants to reiterate that both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated have been disadvantaged by disinformation, discrimination, and medical misadventure.

In fact, governments distracted their populations from needed debate by dividing us into vaxxed and unvaxxed—characterised as the ‘saved’ and the ‘dangerous’. 

They created this strong distinction without any adequate scientific basis.

Their fear narrative overhyped the dangers of Covid infection—the mean age of deaths was in fact similar to average life expectancy.

The mRNA vaccines did not stop transmission, rapidly waned in effectiveness, and caused unprecedented rates of adverse effects. 

To move forward from this, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated will need to take common cause.

scientific debate involving rational discussion has been from the outset suppressed and outlawed

PART ONE

The Need for Rational Science

We need to recognise that a scientific debate involving rational discussion has been from the outset suppressed and outlawed.

Journal publishing on Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccination now runs into tens of thousands of articles. The data reported and their conclusions need to begin to inform changed government policy.

We are now fully aware that in the Omicron environment, mRNA vaccination has virtually no impact on transmission, infection, and hospitalisation rates.

It is also clear that excess all-cause deaths have risen in association with vaccination rates in a number of countries including ours. Unusually this has affected working-age individuals at an unprecedented rate.

We have discussed that a paper published in May 2021 indicated that mRNA vaccination causes a drop in T cell production. T cells are our first line of immune defence. 

It is also clear that contrary to initial expectations, the genetic sequences in mRNA vaccines are relatively mobile and can affect diverse organ systems in the physiology, interfering with their functions.

The Hatchard Report and others have covered and referenced many of these findings in depth during the last few months.

The main point we want to emphasise here is that although Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccine have unique specific effects which distinguish them from each other, they also have a great many toxic effects in common.

For example, high rates of cardiac events. There are long-term impacts of both on health, but their true extent remains largely uninvestigated, and in fact, will only be known as time passes.

Reorienting Our Health Service Response

Here in New Zealand and in other countries, health services need to capture an accurate picture of the health impacts and provide appropriate treatment and compensation for those affected.

In mainstream media, it continues to be unacceptable to associate high rates of cardiac events and strokes with vaccination.

Unprecedented rates of health events among athletes, public figures, and the general population are being variously dismissed as due to stress and described as a ‘Warne anxiety effect’ or a ‘holiday heart syndrome’ etc.

This is patently absurd. The refusal of health authorities in many countries, including our own, to countenance what is becoming obvious and the subject of speculation needs to be rectified.

Accurate surveys of adverse events following vaccination and Covid-19 infection need to be instituted.

Up until now, in most countries, adverse effects reports have been collected through passive voluntary systems leading to massive underreporting. A recent survey of 4,000 representative subjects in Israel reported a disturbing picture—50% of mRNA vaccine recipients who responded experienced adverse effects. 

The incidence rate, severity, and duration of long Covid following Omicron is also unknown.

Any studies need to take account of the fact that people will experience adverse outcomes as a result of both vaccination and Covid infection, their relative importance should be assessed through proper selection of experimental groups: unvaxxed with covid, unvaxxed without covid, vaxxed (1,2, and 3 doses) with covid, and vaxxed without covid.

Otherwise, the complicating effects of mRNA vaccination on Covid outcomes will be underestimated.

• National rates of heart disease and stroke among all age groups, known common outcomes of both vaccination and Covid-19, need to be monitored in real time, rather than reporting at a three year lag as is happening at present.
• Cancer rates need to be monitored. Mutagenic cancer-causing events could become more common when T cell function is suppressed, as it is immediately after mRNA vaccination.

Action Step—Assisting Those Affected

Most importantly, we need to make renewed efforts to identify and assist those affected. 

Due to lack of information, misinformation, or in some cases indifference, GPs and hospital doctors have dismissed many serious medical events as unrelated to vaccination.

Thus people suffering strokes, cardiac events, occurence or resurgence of cancers, and a wide range of other conditions have been left in the dark concerning possible causes.

As such, they have been unaware of the possibility of making insurance and ACC claims. Nor in many cases, have families been able to make rational sense of sudden debilitating health impacts. 

Qualified personnel volunteering at NZDSOS, VFF, and the Health Forum NZ have for more than a year been dialoguing with those affected who have been alert to a possible connection.

No cooperative investigation has been undertaken by Medsafe and the Ministry of Health who have thereby ensured that they remain in blissful ignorance of the true extent of adverse effects.

This is a scandal that needs to be rectified immediately. 

The content and character of government Covid messaging needs to change radically. It should encourage people to come forward, whose health has been affected since the mRNA vaccination rollout began.

A demonstrably independent team should be set up, dedicated to creating a reliable statistical picture and treatment system. This should cover both the vaccine injured and long Covid sufferers.

PART TWO

The Likely Origin of Covid Needs to Influence Our Approach

There is another vital and cogent reason why the vaxxed and unvaxxed have a common cause.

It is likely that both Covid-19 and the mRNA vaccines have similar origins and certain that they have similar effects.

Although we may never know the exact sequence of events that led to the pandemic, there are many reasons to suppose that Covid-19 originated in a laboratory:

• Twelve genetic sequences in the spike protein were known to laboratories before the pandemic. The odds against their appearance together in a specific functioning order have been estimated by some to be more than a trillion to one. One of these sequences reportedly originated in the HIV pathogen, another was the subject of a Moderna patent—sources too diverse to suddenly merge together in a natural setting.
• Chinese virologist Shi Zengli working at the Wuhan Virology Lab, is now known to have been conducting gain of function research funded by the US government. Before the pandemic, she created novel pathogens capable of infecting humans that involved the insertion of unusual sequences similar to those found in the Covid-19 spike protein. Her successful endeavours are the subject of papers she published prior to 2020.
• The high mutation rate and apparent instability of the Covid-19 pathogen that has led to the formation of over 30,000 variants and to radical changes in its symptoms as it mutated, indicates that Covid-19 was probably not a naturally occurring relatively stable variant in an animal population. Moreover the unique spike protein configuration has not been found in animal viruses despite a vigorous search.
• The determination of the Chinese government right from the start to completely eradicate Covid-19, indicates that they possibly knew something about its origins and the dangers it posed. It is possible that they had foreknowledge of the exact nature, purpose, and dangers of the gain of function experiments being conducted at Wuhan.

We now know that the highly unusual Covid spike protein has a strongly toxic effect on the human physiology both from Covid infection and following mRNA vaccination. 

The mRNA vaccine teaches human cells to produce the novel spike protein in order to stimulate an immune response.

Following mRNA vaccination, our body creates spike protein sequences in high concentrations, millions if not billions of times higher than the exposure you might receive from an air borne Covid infection caused by someone coughing or sneezing.

In some cases, the physiology produces or harbours spike protein for months after both vaccination and Covid infection where it is able to continue to adversely affect health.

Action Step—Biotechnology Experimentation Should be Paused

Biotech experimentation is very risky. It has likely created a lethal disease and certainly a lethal vaccine, both of which have had global impacts on health running to millions of casualties.

We must insist on a rational debate about these topics and action to curb laboratory work, otherwise, exotic biotechnology experimentation will continue and proliferate. 

Already pharmaceutical PR is calling for more investment in biotechnology to ‘avert’ future threats. A claim that should be dismissed as absurd. The idea that biotechnology is curing disease is the stuff of myths.

In actuality, as we have just experienced, it is introducing lethal and random risks affecting genetic stability and immune function. This should have been well known through the results of earlier studies on gene therapy outcomes.

Due to government indifference to enforcing ethical safeguards of experimentation, their lack of attention to science publishing, and their reliance on the deceptively comforting use of the word ‘vaccine’ to describe a novel and ineffective biotechnology intervention, we are facing an ongoing global public health crisis of unprecedented proportions.

The implication is that biotechnology experimentation should be paused around the world, otherwise inevitable laboratory accidents will occur again, possibly with even more devastating consequences.

Guy Hatchard has written a book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet.

The text below is an approximate transcript of this video.

Mark Steyn

Have you had your fourth booster yet?

You know, they say sure, you’ll still get the COVID. But don’t worry, it’ll be much milder you won’t be going into the ICU.

There doesn’t seem to be a lot of science behind that assertion. And there’s mounting evidence to the contrary.

A Polish study has found that mRNA vaccines may be damaging brain cells and immune systems.

I talked a couple of weeks ago that they’re causing an uptick in chilblains. Chilblains, you can probably handle. The death of your brain cells and the collapse of your immune system is slightly worse news than chill Blaine’s.

Meanwhile, a German study of all-cause mortality has found that since the vaccinations got going, young and middle-aged persons are dying in larger numbers.

Dr. Guy Hatchard has been writing about this at the conservative woman website for some time. And he joins us now from New Zealand.

Guy the big takeaway from this, which I think is quite extraordinary, is that in 2020 when the COVID started raging, it didn’t actually cause excess mortality that year, because most of the people who died were over the average life expectancy in countries like the UK.

So for example, the average age of COVID death was at 8.5 years or whatever it was. Then they start vaccinating everybody and suddenly we have a huge uptick in deaths of the middle aged and the young and we’re getting used to like celebrity, there’s a spate of celebrity 52-year-olds, I noticed having fatal heart attacks. Something odd is going on, is it not?

Dr. Guy Hatchard

Absolutely it is. The paper yesterday here New Zealand Herald, greetings from The Hobbit Kingdom Mark, the headline Most COVID Patients in the Omicron Outbreak are Vaccinated, but that is no reason to doubt vaccine benefits.

And they also ran an article saying that the huge uptick in cardiac events, they dubbed it the WARNE effect. They said middle-aged men are getting anxiety because they think they may be similar to Shane Warne, and they’re having heart attacks because of anxiety. And that’s what happens when the government

Mark Steyn

Is that actually is that actually true? Are people seriously arguing that Shane Warne died of anxiety – who was a brilliant cricketer, and I regret that I’ll never actually see him do some of those incredible things he did in the 90s.

But people are actually arguing now that this is completely, this is some sort of anxiety, general anxiety that he died of.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

People are doing anything, but admit that something has gone terribly wrong. If our government here for example, was to admit that there was, there had been a wrong turn, you know, we’ve had two years of saturation advertising, you can’t turn on the television or go to social media without being told that mRNA vaccines are completely safe and effective.

And people have become brainwashed and the government has curated this, they paid for it. They paid the media. And now they’re faced with the fact that it actually doesn’t work.

Now, we actually had COVID We’ve had COVID free in New Zealand for two years. Now we have COVID. The vaccinated and unvaccinated are getting it about equally as far as the relative population numbers are concerned.

So it would be political suicide for Ardern to admit for two years that they had been pulling the wool over our eyes and there’s no doubt that that happened. Absolutely deliberately.

The government swept the side effects under the carpet. We had 2000 excess deaths in our very small country during the time that the vaccine was rolled out.

Mark Steyn

Yeah, that’s and that’s very significant. As you say in a population the size of New Zealand. You can see similar things, I think in the most totally vaccinated communities on Earth.

In Gibraltar, for example, and in Israel, they’re still saying though, like the United States, for example, is still saying you’re gonna get need to get the fourth booster.

Right now is there actually any scientific justification for giving anybody another shot of this stuff?

Dr. Guy Hatchard

We’ve known for a long time that every time you take one of these injections, the immune system gets suppressed. In fact, my best friend that I went to university with died from immune suppression.

It’s been known from; there was a paper published, for example, in May 2021, analysing this issue, and now we know a lot more than that. So why is this happening?

Well, pharmaceutical and biotech companies are really directly plumbed into governments, they’re plumbed into medicines regulators, there’s this International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities, the UK is a member is New Zealand as a member.

And that’s a direct line into pharmaceutical propaganda and distortion of evidence. And this is driving government opinion. I’m just Jacinda Ardern has famously said the government should be your only source of information.

Well, her only source of information is pharmaceutical companies. And that, you know, I don’t like to use the word, conspiracy, but it’s a coalition of information systems, mainstream media systems, governments, and biotech companies who are ideologically committed to a biotechnology future.

And that’s a really dangerous future.

We’re facing a different kind of war together. We’re facing a title war, a temple biological war.

Mark Steyn

Why do you think in the normal course of events, there should be room for a diversity of opinion of this. Now, you’ve written about, for example, these German and Polish studies, these are not countries that we think of as fringe countries full of Kooks who’ve cooked this thing up.

Why do they not get more play? Why two years in, is the media still so invested in the official narrative, and only that

Dr. Guy Hatchard

There’s a lot of money riding on it, I think. You know, Biotechnology is seen as the future. And that runs through the whole political and economic system that we have.

And if, if this, if it was to get out, for example, and be accepted, which it should be, that the disease was caused by, it was created in a lab, and the vaccine is created in a lab, people would start to realise that we’re facing something that we’ve never faced before, which is indiscriminate war.

BioTE biotech war is, is a kind of what it’s called the psychology of the serial killer. Any victim will do. Friend or foe. And the more the merrier. Because these diseases, these pathogens do not distinguish between people and countries.

This is a frightening prospect, were and it has to be stopped. But stopping that would change a whole system, which is predicated on the technological evolution of medicine. Whereas in fact, you know, 95% of our health is actually what we eat and what we do how we conduct ourselves.

Mark Steyn

Yeah. No, you’re absolutely right about that. And that’s why I find the most fascinating thing, the stark contrast between excess mortality. That’s as basic an indicator as you can get.

And the fact that when the COVID was rampaging around, there was ultimately no increase in excess mortality because it targeted, basically the very old, then we switch things up.

We come up with these vaccines, and we insist on doing something that’s never been done before where we say basically, everybody on the planet has to get this stuff injected into their arm, including people who are at no risk whatsoever, such as people in young middle age, in the flower of youth, or even primary school children.

So we insist that all of those people have to get jabbed with this stuff. And there is a discernible uptick in excess mortality. And yet, we’re not permitted to talk about it.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

Absolutely. You can’t go there, you can’t talk about it whatsoever. And that is being curated by governments and being suppressed by media. And it’s not a rational argument.

I think one thing we have to realise Mark that we’re not involved in a rational argument here. It’s not a question of sitting down with someone and saying, let’s look at the science because I was in a position at the start here of corresponding with people who were advising the government.

And when I started to raise some doubts, and say, well, look the side effects don’t look good, then the conversation finished. And it was a point of faith that the vaccine was a standalone solution.

And this has been a point of faith in an increasingly, kind of commercially orientated medical system, that vaccination is the standalone solution.

Whereas in fact, the central underpinning factors of health are, what we eat, how we exercise, how well we sleep, how well we, you know, conduct ourselves. So we enjoy and we’re not stressed, these other real factors of health.

I suggested right from the start here. I said to the government, we have to go ahead and have a programme to help people improve their health habits, but that was completely rejected. No, we’re going to go with vaccination.

Mark Steyn

Yeah, we, for example, obesity is one of the factors, the most serious underlying conditions if you’re 40 pounds overweight, or whatever. That’s more determinant of how you’re going to handle COVID than anything.

But what I can’t understand now is why there must be discussion of some of this at the highest levels in government. And yet governments around the world, in Canada, for example, you can’t get on a train unless you’ve been vaccinated.

So you’re stuck where you are, you can’t take a train from Montreal to Toronto unless you’ve got proof of your vaccination status. How can they still insist on that? Given A what happened with the Omicron? So we’ve seen it makes no difference and B what these the disturbing questions these studies are raising.

Dr. Guy Hatchard

It’s a form of hubris. People have started to play God.

I think you can see this in politics is that your last guest was talking about this, that people really believe in themselves and their authority. Our whole system of having stakeholders has disappeared.

Historically, democracy had stakeholders. And it dates right back to King John and the Magna Carta when he had to, instead of he had to rule with the Barons instead of over them.

And we have had scientists, we have had people in medicine and so on. And the government has moved away from that model. They no longer have stakeholders, they play it more like a reality TV game where there’s only one winner and he tells every way he gets all the money and he tells everyone what to do.

And, this kind of psychology is wrapped up with it. Plus, there’s this idea that has been sold to everyone that biotechnology is going to cure every disease. And this is the big lie.

Look at the research. It’s highly mutagenic. It’s the gene therapy that has been huge over the last 30 years. It’s not working.

Mark Steyn

Now, that’s a very good point. And it’s good of you to remind us of Magna Carta, we need to get some of these guys into a big baggy field off the River Thames and do that to them all over again.

Thank you very much Guy.

We’re gonna stay on this and we will watch we will read what you write and we will watch for other studies from Germany and Poland and such places.

A new preprint study conducted in Poland and published at bioRxiv investigates the effect of mRNA vaccine on glial cells in vitro (outside the physiology). Its conclusions point to possible effects of mRNA vaccines on crucial brain functions.

Glial cells or neuroglia, are non-neuronal cells in the central nervous system, including the brain, spinal column and the peripheral nervous system, that do not produce electrical impulses.

They maintain homeostasis and form the white fatty coating called myelin which protects axons—the electrical communication pathways between neurons.

Glial cells have several main functions in the brain including:

1. to surround neurons and hold them in place;
2. to supply nutrients and oxygen to neurons;
3. to insulate one neuron from another;
4. to destroy pathogens and remove dead neurons.
5. to protect the integrity of the blood-brain barrier
6. to facilitate neurotransmission and synaptic connections
7. to support physiological processes like breathing

Glial cells have far more cellular diversity and functions than neurons, and glial cells can respond to and manipulate neurotransmission in many ways.

Additionally, glial cells can affect both the preservation and consolidation of memories and are understood to be involved in cognitive processes.

The authors of the paper were mainly engaged in demonstrating the effectiveness of new RAMAN imaging technology for use in the investigation of alterations in biochemical pathways associated with cancer development.

However, their research unexpectedly revealed a range of effects of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine on mitochondria which amount to reductions in immune responses by glial cells which normally operate to support the immunity and functioning of the brain.

The authors conclude:

“We observed the effect of the mRNA vaccine on biodistribution of different chemical components, particularly cytochrome c, in the specific organelles of human brain glial cells: nucleus, mitochondria, lipid droplets, cytoplasm, rough endoplasmatic reticulum and membrane.

“We showed that mRNA vaccine (Pfizer) changes mitochondria by downregulation of cytochrome c resulting in lower effectiveness of respiration (oxidative phosphorylation) and lower ATP production. It can lead to lower immune system response.”

The authors further conclude that alterations in lipid (fat) production at the mitochondrial membrane are consistent with changes normally associated with increased aggressiveness of brain cancers and cell death.

This is a highly technical paper which is explained in a video here.

The study was conducted outside the brain in vitro (cellular research in vivo, inside the brain, is beyond present technical means) so its conclusions are subject to caution.

Moreover, for the same reasons, we do not know how much, or if, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine penetrates into the brain. The study is also a preprint, which means it has not yet undergone extensive peer review although it has been judged suitable by bioRxiv for public release and comment.

Nevertheless its conclusions are highly concerning. They are consistent with other studies showing that the Pfizer mRNA degrades immune response and they indicate the need for further research in this direction.

We have previously written that insufficient information is available about the effect of mRNA vaccine on higher human functions.

Most of all, this study confirms that the introduction of mRNA vaccines was rushed without sufficient safety testing of long term and broader spectrum secondary effects.

It also confirms that the introduction of active genetic sequences mRNA into the human physiology can have serious effects on stability (homeostasis) and mutagenesis through reduced immune capability.

Molecular and electrical pathways in the brain are tightly controlled, energised, and protected through gene-based functions. Interference with gene function can have multiple unexpected outcomes as happened here to brain cells in vitro.

The study authors imply that there may be accelerated death of glial cells whose functions, listed at the start of this article, support crucial brain processes.

This study underlines how far removed the global Covid pandemic response has been from a precautionary approach. Our government should take note.

Launching novel genetic technologies in a hurry without adequate testing can result in uncontrolled serious adverse outcomes.

Slowly but surely the truth is seeping out, and it is not pretty. On May 6 2021 a preprint paper was published on medRxiv The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate immune responses

This paper, which caused little stir at the time, reports that the body’s first immune defense against illness — T-cells — are suppressed following Pfizer mRNA vaccination. The paper summarised:

“In conclusion, the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine induces complex functional reprogramming of innate immune responses, which should be considered in the development and use of this new class of vaccines.”

We could be forgiven for not knowing exactly what this implies for our health, but recently US pathologists have been speaking up about an uptick in cancers.

If T-cells are suppressed, cancers receive a ‘get out of jail free’ card

If T-cells are suppressed, cancers receive a ‘get out of jail free’ card. Everyone will be aware of what this means, most cancers develop slowly over time, but without adequate T-cell function, they can develop and spread more rapidly.

Precisely what pathologists are reporting in the US, including even unexpected sudden-onset cancers.

This paper was published 10 months ago, so why wasn’t more done to follow up on the warning in the paper? An interview with US pathologist Dr. Ray Cole provides the answers.

Early warning signs and calls to perform autopsies on deaths subsequent to vaccination, and thereby cast a wider investigative net, were ignored by medical professionals and administrators. They said “we really don’t want to get into that”.

The Problems with Our Pandemic Response Run Deep

Much the same has happened here in New Zealand. In most cases, autopsies have been judged unnecessary, removing a vital tool from the process of discovering the causes of excess deaths.

Despite the introduction of a novel biotech vaccine following greatly reduced testing requirements, few if any additional safeguards were introduced. Mandatory reporting of adverse effects following vaccination was specifically rejected.

The problems go much deeper than that. Many factors have contributed to the largest public health safety failing in New Zealand history. These involved failings at many levels and in many sectors of healthcare, government, and the media.

The government and the ministry of health decided to accept reassurances from Pfizer about safety and efficacy at face value. Nothing that emerged subsequently shook their faith or reduced their saturation advertising promising the public safety:

• Early warnings from Israel in the first half of 2021 that vaccine effectiveness wore off rapidly and did not even get close to the 95% that Pfizer promised were dismissed.

• A post-marketing report from Pfizer in April 2021 documenting a huge range of adverse effects was kept hidden.

• The conclusions of scientific journal papers reporting high rates of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination, especially among the under 40s, were not passed on to GPs or hospitals until mid December 2021, six months after they first came to light.

Why Did the Government Hide Data From the Public?

Have The NZ Government Sought to Hide Covid Vaccination Risks?

Increasingly over the last few years our government and the medical profession have become firmly plugged into the pharmaceutical PR pipeline. To coin a phrase, this became the government’s only source of truth. Pfizer has an appalling safety record, so our government certainly has to share the blame.

It gets worse, the government had strong faith, they decided to insist on regulations which went beyond those recommended by Pfizer. Vaccination exemptions which Pfizer said should be granted to those injured by the first dose were denied by Dr. Ashley Bloomfield. Vaccine adverse events were judged to be mild and short lived without any long term data to back up the claim.

Most of the early warning signs were a matter of public record in science journals, so why were few warning voices raised among the medical profession? GPs that spoke up were sanctioned and threatened with expulsion by the General Medical Council. Neither did the media report their concerns, except to lampoon them as fringe wackos deserving of punishment.

Dire Predictions Were Misleading

Clearly, the government was afraid of a severe outbreak. Modellers were predicting 80,000 Covid deaths in New Zealand. Overseas reports of deaths appeared to be catastrophic. We now know that the British and American press promoted sensational coverage.

Deaths because of Covid were likely as low as 10% of deaths with Covid. UKSHA reports that the average age of Covid deaths was 82.9 years, higher than the UK life expectancy.

There were also early mistakes with treatment protocols. Intubation is a very invasive and risky procedure, 85% of those with Covid receiving this treatment died. It is now seldom used.

Promising cost-effective early treatment protocols were dismissed as quack cures, while pharmaceutical companies quietly urged governments to wait for their expensive medicines under development.

Money Turned Heads

There was another powerful force at work—money.

Our government decided to borrow big and splash the cash. From the outset, they set aside $64 billion dollars of additional borrowing to be spent on mitigating the impact of the pandemic especially by encouraging vaccination.

The full strategy and figures haven’t been released by the government (an answer to an OIA request contains significant redactions), but these are some of the mostly secondhand reports we have received:

• Doctors reportedly receive $300 for each person they vaccinate

• Institutions offering testing are paid $125 for each test administered

• If you rounded up people and ferried them to vaccination centres, the bounty was $100 per person

• Pharmacies are paid $45 per RAT test

• Very substantial cash grants were made to Maraes that agreed to host vaccination without a rigorous requirement for accounting.

• Our government pays around $110 to laboratories for each PCR test completed (USA hospitals have charged patients as much as NZ$1,000 for each test, but only pay $75 to the lab)

• Our government has never officially confirmed what they pay Pfizer for each injection. Estimates range from $30 to $60 for each jab (10 million have been given).

• Mainstream media was paid at least $60 million in government grants in addition to proceeds from the massive government advertising budget.

These are just the tip of the iceberg, the list goes on. This was a time of cash bonanzas for many associated with the medical profession. A GP I know had reservations about the safety of the Pfizer mRNA jab, but enthusiastically promoted Covid vaccination to his patients. The money was too good to turn down.

It takes real dedication to spend $64 billion, but the government managed it and more besides. You and I will have to pay this back. Increasing our low emergency bed capacity was not even prioritised.

Hospitals like Whangarei General with sewage leaking within its walls were told they would have to wait for repairs while the Covid gravy train rolled on.

Was Evidence Cited from a Balanced Perspective?

Members of the medical profession found themselves in the public eye. They all knew that there was only one message acceptable to the government: ‘vaccinate’.

Turning a blind eye to risks became a professional requirement.

Ethical standards were reframed, the hippocratic oath forgotten. There is no doubt this was a matter of faith, faith in vaccination as a stand-alone medical intervention beyond reproach.

The fact that mRNA technology bore no resemblance in its action or effects to anything that had previously been called a vaccine, was something that could be forgotten in the heady days when epidemiologists, modellers, and vaccine experts became front page news and revered public idols.

Did scientists, ministers, and government advisors reference the primary evidence while speaking? If they did (which was seldom), they were very careful to cite papers written by colleagues who were every bit as enthusiastic as themselves, often funded by vested interests. Were they well paid?

Apparently so, new institutions such as Te Punaha Matatini, enjoyed government support and duly published papers advising the government among other things that adverse effects of mRNA vaccination were a conspiracy theory.

Journal papers raising questions were dismissed as fringe. Privately some admitted there were dangers and deficiencies, but had faith that vaccinations would improve in the long run, so no worries.

Yesterday the government announced that unvaccinated New Zealand citizens abroad would no longer be required to enter MIQ on their return. A sign that things are changing.

However it will take more than just rolling back mandates to normalise the New Zealand health landscape. The effects of propaganda will have to be rolled back, safety measures introduced, independent voices installed within our regulatory systems. Lessons must be learned.

Principally the inherent dangers of novel biotechnology need to be recognised. The whole biotechnology research enterprise, which likely caused the pandemic, should be paused and reassessed.

Already we are witnessing the pharmaceutical PR machine placing articles in papers around the world calling for money to be spent on developing new biotech vaccines for their future pandemics.

This should be a never again moment, but it will not be so unless we wake up to the need for medical reform, government accountability, and media balance.

The New Zealand Bill of Rights needs to be entrenched in the constitution. Those adversely affected need to be compensated including those who lost their livelihoods. Otherwise fear will remain normalised.

Yesterday a new paper at an open access platform (OSF) was published about German excess all-cause deaths. This offered confirmatory evidence concerning the excess all-cause deaths in NZ we have already reported. It adds significantly to the growing body of evidence being reported around the world.

There are a number of interesting points in the German data which is broken down by age. During 2020, Covid infections peaked but all-cause mortality was not seriously elevated, whereas during 2021 while the mRNA vaccine was being rolled out, German all-cause deaths were elevated for the 15-79 year old age range.

This is not an isolated statistic. All-cause deaths among working age populations are increasing. Official US all-cause death data paints a depressingly similar picture to the German and New Zealand stats. Commercial insurance data confirms this.

Edward Dowd, an internationally respected investment advisor who manages billions of dollars, reported in February that US group life insurance policy claims for death benefits are increasing dramatically.

These policies cover employees working for US corporations. Dowd reported Q4 increases 2021 vs 2019: Agon +56%, Unum +36%, Lincoln National +57%, Prudential +41%, Reinsurance Group of America +21%, Harford Mutual Insurance Group +32%.

A comparison of 15-79 year old German all-cause deaths with vaccinations by month shows how vaccination numbers mirrored deaths.

It also shows how an increase in all-cause deaths occured when boosters were rolled out. The relationship is similar to the observed excess all-cause deaths in NZ.

The significance of this data cannot be overestimated. UKHSA reports that the average age of people dying from Covid is 82.9 years, higher than the average UK life expectancy.

Therefore all-cause deaths among the 15-79 year age bracket are not expected to increase significantly as a result of Covid infections. The implications of the observed rises across multiple countries are very disturbing.

Most studies of long term outcomes following Covid infection are not differentiating between subjects who have been vaccinated and those who are not.

This allows vaccine advocates, pharmaceutical manufacturers, and governments to continue to blame adverse outcomes including deaths on Covid infection alone or chance events without considering the adverse effect of mRNA vaccination, whose long term impacts may be even larger.

The German data supports causal attribution of increases in all-cause deaths to the effects of mRNA Covid vaccination.

What We Are All Thinking but Are Not Allowed to Say

It is still not politically correct to talk about Covid vaccination deaths. This week’s People magazine reports a 25 year old celebrity is recovering after developing a blood clot that moved to her brain.

A vascular neurologist commented

“We think of stroke as being something that happens in older ages, but we are seeing it in younger and younger people. It relates, generally, to people having unhealthy lifestyles, maybe not eating as well or not getting regular exercise”.

Neither of which possible causes apply to the celebrity, a fit, healthy eater. The vascular surgeon omitted to mention that the increases in deaths among younger age groups accelerated just last year.

This case is just one more of a long and unprecedented list of celebrities and sports people suffering recent thrombotic and cardiac events, but we are not allowed to utter the magic words ‘mRNA vaccination’.

Others are beginning to see the light. This week John Campbell, respected provaxx YouTube Covid commentator from the UK with 2 million followers, changed sides. He read out the key points from the court-ordered Pfizer release of adverse effects documents, threw up his hands in despair, and expressed anger at how we have all been misled from the start.

A list of 1,223 deaths and 42,086 adverse events across broad categories of serious illness led to his censure. Read more about the key Pfizer document at the Hatchard Report.

New Zealand Carries on Regardless

At a press conference on Thursday, Northern Region Health Coordination Centre (NRHCC) chief clinical officer Dr. Andrew Old said only a third of the 1,000 people currently in hospital with Covid-19 were there due to the effects of the virus.

He did not provide any details about how many of this third were vaccinated and how many unvaccinated. He didn’t provide any data on how many of the modest number of deaths were ‘with Covid’ and how many were ‘because of Covid’.

So all bets are off when it comes to analysing New Zealand data. Yet Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, the New Zealand Director General of Health, who was interviewed by Mike Hosking yesterday morning, said the 1,000 people in hospital would not be there if it wasn’t for Covid. Hosking had to correct him (a big thank you to Mike).

This means for the last few weeks we have been subjected to a meaningless psychobabble of palpably false Covid statistics designed by the Ministry of Health to contain us in a state of constant fear.

What the government hasn’t really talked about is their failure to upgrade the emergency departments of New Zealand hospitals (they’ve had two years to prepare), instead spending 64 billion dollars of borrowed money promoting an ineffective Covid vaccination programme.

The NZ Herald reports our hospital system is in crisis, strained to breaking point. The statistics show that the hospitals are overwhelmed with vaccinated Covid patients, but you wouldn’t know it unless you moved beyond government propaganda.

The unqualified ‘explainers’ of mainstream media are willing partners in this deception:

The NZ Herald suggested that the unvaccinated should be denied entry to New Zealand for the foreseeable future (translation: permanently).

Stuff wrote that being vaccine hesitant is analogous to membership of a sex cult.

The public is heartedly sick of being treated like kindergarten children. Despite the mounting evidence of ineffectiveness and serious harm, the focus of government and the health system is still saturation advertising proclaiming the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccination.

Meanwhile thousands of people in and out of hospital with serious illness continue to be under-resourced and in some cases neglected. A situation exacerbated by the sacking of unvaccinated health staff.

The NZ Ministry of Health is in Denial

So why hasn’t our Ministry of Health commented on the association between excess all-cause death and mRNA vaccination, except to go into denial? Well the Ministry of Health isn’t squeaky clean when it comes to statistics.

Last week Radio NZ reported that 97% of the New Zealand population are vaccinated but the unvaccinated account for 17% of hospitalisations. But my team found that the Ministry of Health has been using NZ population figures based upon everyone registered with a GP or who has used the health service in the previous year.

These records are known to be considerably below the true population. If you use the corrected population figures, as low as 85% of eligible New Zealanders may be vaccinated which equates with the percentage of vaccinated hospital admissions with Covid (all categories of vaccination 1, 2, and 3.).

So the effect of mRNA vaccination on Omicron is, as other overseas studies have indicated, very limited, at most limited to a small effect of boosters which wears off rapidly (within 10 weeks according to Israeli data).

UKHSA data suggests that as the effectiveness of the vaccine wanes, the individual is left with a lower immunity than before vaccination.

Excess all-cause death is not a statistic that can be ignored. Dr. Ashley Bloomfield says it is not necessary to institute mandatory reporting of adverse events following vaccination.

What planet is he on?

We need an immediate end to mandates, proper assessment of adverse effects, and adequate compensation and treatment for those affected.