Home Blog Page 7

What is Natural Law?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
What is Natural Law?

The world is in crisis and in transition as I write. Nuclear armed powers India and Pakistan are at war, extending the conflict zone that has engulfed the Middle East. China is specifically threatening Taiwan with new weapons it has deployed successfully in Pakistan. The devastating effects of experimental biotechnology, whether in the form of engineered viruses or vaccines, have killed millions and adversely affected the lives of billions. Biotech battle lines have been set and the US administration has belatedly launched a rearguard action. Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jnr. has made key appointments at the FDA and at other agencies, who are insisting on scientific safety and efficacy testing standards for medicines and foods. mRNA technology is specifically under fire. Shares in biotech companies have tanked as a result. In an act of schizophrenia, mainstream media have largely abandoned caution and common sense in favour of attacks on Trump administration appointees, including RFK Jnr., whatever the validity of their statements and questions. As conflicts deepen, we have decided to go back to the most fundamental and ancient principles of natural law in an effort to describe solutions.

Natural law, physics and consciousness

There are innumerable laws of nature operating at every level of creation and at every time and place. At their foundation is the most powerful level of natural law, a field of supersymmetry, which is present everywhere with its whole potential available at every point. The laws of physics describe four fundamental forces Electromagnetism, Weak and Strong Nuclear forces and Gravity. These merge together at smaller time and distance scales, just like the four fingers of the hand which come together at the palm, eventually becoming completely unified at the Planck scale (10-33 cms and 10-43 secs).

The self referral character of the unified level of nature’s functioning identifies it as a field of universal consciousness which transcends time and space, yet supports it everywhere. This is further verified by the necessity of referencing an ‘observer’ to complete consistent physical theories of reality. Thus the material universe is irrevocably joined to our own consciousness. A connection we benefit from personally everyday as we perceive the world around us. Going deeper, the experience of the source of all the laws of nature is fully available to everyone in their own most settled state of consciousness which can be effortlessly achieved in deep meditation.

How do you know the truth?

The essence of natural law is the ‘Truth’—that which is: ‘Pure Consciousness’ or ‘Being’ with a capital ‘B’. When truth is respected and protected, in the management of society and in the daily life of everyone, society can prosper. Word of mouth can be trusted and the rule of national law can be just and fair.

An article in the NY Times headlines “A.I. Is Getting More Powerful, but Its Hallucinations Are Getting Worse”. It reports “A new wave of “reasoning” systems from companies like OpenAI is producing incorrect information more often. Even the companies don’t know why.” A.I. bots analyse enormous amounts of stored digital data from past internet postings.The NY Times continues: “AI Systems do not — and cannot — decide what is true and what is false. Sometimes, they just make stuff up, a phenomenon some A.I. researchers call hallucinations. On one test, the hallucination rates of newer A.I. systems were as high as 79 percent.” 8 out of 10 answers were wrong—a failing grade.

AI systems use mathematical probabilities to guess the best response, they are not using a strict set of rules defined by human engineers. So they make a certain number of mistakes. “Despite our best efforts, they will always hallucinate,” said Amr Awadallah, the chief executive of Vectara, a start-up that builds A.I. tools for businesses, and a former Google executive. “That will never go away.”In other words, even in critical applications AI systems can be completely unreliable.Nor will AI systems be able to innovate in the full sense of the word, they can simply rearrange things, or to use more understandable language, they can mimic and misrepresent the past and jumble up present reality. The truth remains hidden.

All computer hardware uses binary digital networks where logic gates can be either off or on and nothing in between. In contrast the human mind is not binary. It has sophisticated tools to know the truth. It experiences through five senses, it reasons with the intellect and can weigh the significance of the past. It perceives, infers, compares and crucially it listens and discusses with others who also have conscious minds.

According to the ancient science of reasoning known as Nyaya, there are sixteen points which can be used to test the validity of knowledge. In addition to the above, these include:

  • The capacity to identify and categorise distinct objects, objectives and relevant examples.
  • The capacity to identify, entertain and quantify doubt.
  • Knowing established principles including applying steps of logic and reasoning to draw conclusions.
  • Probing and attacking opposing views including the use of argument, dispute and ridicule.
  • The exposure of contradictions, fallacies, circular arguments, unproven premises, irrelevant material and disagreement on foundational premises.
  • Identifying words with two meanings, invalid generalisations, futile discussions and the correct use of analogies and metaphor.

In addition the human mind can identify special qualities of an object and assign numerical values and a hierarchy to its structure and antecedents.

The human mind carries out many of these processes instinctively, they are built into our mind/body set up.

The Science of Yoga further identifies harmonious and beneficial behaviours and procedures which reveal and enhance, rather than disrupt, the essential unity of life. Such principles are found in cultural, philosophical and religious traditions around the world;

Human consciousness has another possibility certainly not open to a computer, the direct appreciation or experience of the grand unity of life. In other words, participating in the WHOLENESS of existence. We are aware that a human can only know one thing at a time, whereas the laws of nature know and manage all things everywhere simultaneously. Something that religious people designate as God’s Will. Despite the limitation of human consciousness to one thing at a time, the apex of human awareness involves rising to a complete harmony with natural law that gives the benefit of all knowledge—becoming fully immersed in the natural order and essential joy of creation. An achievement that has been recognised in the lives of saints and sages throughout the ages.

What is national law?

Society is subject to national law which is created by human intervention operating in the field of politics and justice. Since time immemorial it has been recognised that national law depends for its authority on natural law. Only if national law respects and harmonises with natural law does it have true validity. If national law contradicts or violates natural law, it fails to uphold the integrity of society. When natural law is continuously violated in individual and national life, stress builds up in individual and collective consciousness and in nature, eventually erupting into conflict and catastrophe..

We cannot vote for natural law in national elections. In fact, politicians we elect do not generally recognise the sovereign power of natural law. Successive governments have passed laws which fail to recognise the steps of valid reasoning outlined above. Thus mistakes pile up on top of one another. In this way national law legitimises the violation of natural law. For example, sweeping generalisations have been made about the safety of small percentages of chemical or biosynthetic compounds added to foods, as well as processing residues. This has not been based on actual safety testing. As a result there have been rapidly accelerating rates of cancer. Such mistakes fail to grasp the integrated interdependent evolutionary history of the biosphere—how natural food chains allow the assimilation of nature’s intelligence.

Crucially, the intelligence of living organisms including human intelligence depends on the integrity of our genetic structures. This in turn depends on the quality of food we consume everyday. Whole fresh unadulterated food is essential to maintain health. Moreover our capacity to harmonise with natural law depends on the natural integrity of our own genetic structures in all their complexity and sophistication. Thus genetic structures support the ability to experience the fundamental nexus of cosmic life. How this miracle of life is achieved is beyond the understanding of modern biotechnology, yet the biotech industry is continuing to recklessly edit genetic systems. A recipe for disaster that dwarfs most other dangers of the modern age and threatens annihilation.

How do you increase harmony with natural law?

We are faced with the reckless ignorance of modern politicians and parties about the dangers of biotechnology and their consequent inability to protect human health and happiness. New laws like the NZ Gene Technology Bill are sweeping aside common rights and protections in a rush to deregulate biotech experimentation, even mandating individual compliance. Although almost powerless at the ballot box due to the lack of suitable candidates and knowledgeable media coverage, we can become more powerful and influence decision making. We can do this through recognising the power of WHOLENESS within. This can be achieved through increased harmony with natural law, whereby the power of nature is co-opted to our cause. This is an indirect approach to conflict resolution, but the power of natural law which governs the whole universe is actually the best friend and supporter we can have.

We have control over our thought, speech and action, including what food we consume.

The essence of natural law is truth, remaining truthful is a powerful technology to harness natural law. The technique to achieve this was explained by Shakespeare who wrote this advice in his play Hamlet:

“This above all: to thine own self be true, and it must follow, as the night the day, thou canst not then be false to any man.”

History records the lives of individuals in every age who liberated their nations because they stuck resolutely to truth and justice. The highest form of ‘being true to thine own self’ is achieved in deep meditation but the saying also calls for disciplined thinking and speaking. The sweet truth is important, overly harsh words, even though true, can harm others. Constantly finding fault with others without providing solutions reflects back negatively on everyone including oneself. Every teacher knows that identifying even one positive trait in a student and then appreciating and encouraging it, works a thousand times better than criticism and disparagement.

We cannot know the innumerable effects of any action in their entirety, but always consider the time and place of any action. Is the action suitable for the environment? Is the time right?

The ancients celebrated and acknowledged the changing seasons and the cycles of nature which support growth. For example, it is well known that planting according to the phases of the moon is more successful, perhaps what is not so well known is how the effect of the seasons, circadian rhythms and lunar phases spills over into everyday life. The current English parliament was elected and the cabinet chosen on a no moon day, you can check the result out in the newspapers.

Cathedrals, temples and ancient monuments were often oriented to the rising sun. The morning sun is especially healing and energising. According to architectural principles known as Vastu Vidya, an entrance facing true east brings support of nature and improved health for the occupants.

Avoid cruelty to others and to animals. Those that put profit before health, happiness, morality and justice degrade the quality of their life and that of others. There are always consequences in this life or the next. Ultimately truth alone will triumph.

Politicians have assumed more and more power over our daily lives in ignorance of the sovereignty of natural law. But nature knows better than man how to organise. Working with nature is important. An organic diet rich in whole foods and fresh fruits and vegetables is healthy, it connects us with the pool of genetic intelligence in the biosphere. When I worked in Armenia for a year, high up in the Caucasus Mountains the dinner table included plates of fresh herbs to sprinkle on the meal. I met many people of a great age still in fine health. There were also many caves carved into hillsides where early Christian mystics practised meditation. Ancient traditions including herbal medicine in the home have been mistakenly forgotten. Around monasteries in Europe, there are still varieties of medicinal herbs flourishing in meadows. Variety is the spice of life.

Invitation

For a forest to be green, the trees must be green. For the world to be at peace, for the government to act intelligently, for the society to be healthy, peace, intelligence and health must be within the reach of individual members. This should be the result of education. Unfortunately education today has failed its students. They are not developing their full potential and graduates remain unaware of their deep connection with natural law. This is why we are continuing to promote our educational initiative to understand the wholeness of life and act in accord with natural law. We are inviting you to support and participate in this endeavour and look forward to hearing from you.

A Licence To Kill

Guy Hatchard
-
0
A Licence To Kill

The average number of sunshine hours in New Zealand is above 2,000 per year. In the United Kingdom, it averages around 1,350.

Incredibly, the Telegraph reports that the British government has decided to approve experiments to ‘dim the light of the sun’. The British boffins (is that the right term or should it be ‘buffoons’, or possibly ‘dimwits’) are going to try to turn clouds whiter and intend to seed the upper atmosphere with pollution in order to deflect light from the sun. I suppose they are aware of periods in history when particles emitted by volcanic eruptions dimmed the light of the sun and caused widespread famine and death. But no matter, Prof Mark Symes, the programme director for ARIA (Advanced Research and Invention Agency), said: “Everything we do is going to be safe by design.”

The UK isn’t stopping there, in what should be a win for common sense the Supreme Court has ruled there are only two sexes, but a movement has sprang up across the country. Some hospitals are defying moves to have women only wards. The London Marathon organisers have decided to let trans people run in the women’s category offering a life line to those bearded ladies with their larger hearts and bigger bone structures who aspire to the top step of sporting achievement. Sometimes we just don’t know what to think.

Over in the United States, President Trump is worried that there are too few genuine American babies being born and too many foreign tourist births. A curious mix. The fall in fertility that has engulfed the Western world should be a matter of concern. Certainly, our diet and lifestyle are having an effect, but have we considered our clothing? We should be. A study published in 1993 entitled “Effect of different types of textile fabric on spermatogenesis: an experimental study” found that male dogs that were dressed in polyester underpants lost fertility whereas there was no effect on those dressed in cotton or wool. Similar studies on female dogs in 2007/8 found falls in fertility and effects of polyester garments on pregnancy including spontaneous abortions. How they managed to persuade the dogs to wear underpants for six months is a mystery, an even bigger mystery is why they didn’t ask the same questions of humans? How dim is that? This should have raised red flags thirty years ago. Instead our underwear shops are full of polyester.

Nature knows better than man how to organise

Nature is not just neutral. It is trying to help us. Fashionable scientists and governments from both sides of the aisle scoff at those sticking to natural living. It seems that everyone these days feels they have the right to edit or cancel nature. Have we forgotten that nature has laws? These are not rules, they are paths to promote evolution. Physical laws have a common mathematical structure of least action. With their cosmic reach, they have succeeded over millions of eons and continue to operate in our favour today. Nature is not just neutral as some seem to think, it supports and promotes health. Organic cotton vs polyester, whole foods vs processed foods, sunshine vs artificial light, herbs vs chemicals, the fragrance of a rose vs synthetic scents, natural immunity vs injections, fresh air vs air conditioning, spring water vs chlorinated and fluoridated water, the human voice vs autotune: we know which ones come first. Take one step more and realise that ‘natural’ is not just helpful, it is essential. And then a second step to realise that thousands of synthetic chemicals and processes are polluting and degrading life on the planet, the air, the water, the soil, our food, our life and our health.

Most people can feel the distinction between the real and the synthetic, you can touch, see, taste, smell or hear the difference. Consumers instinctively care about traditional natural foods. A misconception of the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill and similar biotech deregulation around the world is the suggestion that there will be a high demand for ‘climate friendly’ alternative foods. This doesn’t seem to be the case. An article from the Australian Daily Mail entitled “Vegan ‘butcher’ unleashes as business dries up amid surprising new trend: ‘We’re out of money’“. It documents falling demand for plant based meat alternatives with multiple companies in the industry going under during the last two years.

The article documents the reasons consumers are turning away including:

  • Higher price: “Budget concerns are a much bigger factor now, and also environmental concerns, [i.e. long term damage to the environment] “
  • “Plant-based was considered healthy, then people realised it’s mostly processed foods and the trend now is on whole foods,”

Most of these meat alternatives are produced using biotech processes subject to residual DNA contamination in virtually all products. Contrary to the expectations of governments and biotech entrepreneurs, these are not proving attractive to consumers. They aren’t economic winners for anyone.

There is a deeper agenda here. Cast aside for a moment all the legislative fluff contained in hundreds of pages of the Gene Technology Bill, the main purpose appears to be the removal of any requirement to label the GM origin of biotech foods. This will remove any element of consumer preference. We simply won’t know what we are eating. The biotech moguls believe removal of any labelling is the only way for GM foods to establish a market presence. This amounts to a carte blanche to experiment on the public, a ‘licence to kill’ which extends into the field of medicine as happened during the pandemic.

Of course, under the proposed regulatory regime, GM food will not be sold without any labels, their labels will happily splash about deceptive and misleading words like natural, healthy, whole, nutritious, tasty and so on without any hint of their GM origins. The whole Gene Technology Bill enterprise is an intentional consumer fraud. 

We cannot change the past, but what we do in the present can change our future

Write to your MP, demand the withdrawal of the Gene Technology Bill and a provision for full disclosure labelling of all genetically altered origins including processing using genetically modified microorganisms. Tell your friends, shopkeepers you know and work colleagues about the Gene Technology Bill. There has been so little public discussion that few people are aware of its draconian provisions,

Sunday 27th is the last day to make a submission to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into Covid-19 Phase 2. Make your submission and add the observation that the Gene Technology Bill pre-empts the Commission’s work. It contains a clause legalising medical mandates. The Bill should be withdrawn.

Landmark Study Finds Repeated mRNA Vaccination Increases Vulnerability to Cancer Progression

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Landmark Study Finds Repeated mRNA Vaccination Increases Vulnerability to Cancer Progression

This article goes deeply into the principles of natural law governing life everywhere, it presents fundamental problems outlined in recently published scientific papers and then suggests the solution.

Fortunately, some responsible scientists around the world are continuing to investigate the fallout from the global mRNA COVID-19 vaccination programme which delivered 13 billion doses in total. Japanese scientists have completed a study of the effect of COVID-19 vaccination on Pancreatic Cancer (PC) patients in their hospital system entitled “Repeated COVID-19 Vaccination as a Poor Prognostic Factor in Pancreatic Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Center Cohort Study“. The study is having a global impact, within a day of its publication it has already been downloaded 4000 times.

The study begins with the obligatory homage to mRNA technology damning it with faint praise as “a significant technological advance”, which is a misrepresentation still necessary to ensure the paper’s acceptance for publication (yes, journals are still clinging on to the fantasy). It then plunges into the detailed story of cancer vulnerability. It examined the impact of COVID-19 vaccinations on the survival of 272 PC patients in their hospital admitted between January 2018 and November 2023.

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive cancer with a low survival rate (about 10-12% after 5 years). It is often detected at a late stage when it is already invading nearby structures, eventually metastasising to other parts of the body. The Japanese study found that repeated COVID-19 booster vaccinations are associated with poorer overall survival in patients with PC.

“Patient outcomes had improved each year by 2020; however, it began to deteriorate in 2021 and outcomes in 2022-2023 were significantly worse than those in 2018-2021”

The authors investigated a possible mechanism and concluded as follows:

“Notably, our analysis reveals that high levels of IgG4 [an immune suppressant we have discussed in many previous reports including our Open Letter to Medical Professionals and Life Scientists] induced by vaccination, correlate with a detrimental prognosis in these patients.These insights provide essential information regarding the interplay between vaccination and cancer progression, which has significant implications for patient management strategies. Our study highlights the necessity for ongoing research into the long-term effects of mRNA vaccinations on cancer prognosis, which remains a pressing concern in the evolving landscape of public health and cancer treatment.”

The complex statistical analysis involved detailed consideration and matching into groups for age, sex, comorbidities, treatment history, vaccination history, etc. Overall those COVID-19 vaccinated 2 times had a longer survival than those vaccinated 3 times (p=0.006). Microbiological testing found a reduced immune response in the 3 times vaxxed group compared to the 2 times vaxxed group. The study did not examine outcomes for other cancer types. I leave this omission for your reflection.

The enduring mystery is why our health system is still recommending and encouraging mRNA COVID-19 vaccination? The release of this study comes following on from the release of dozens of others we have reported (see here for example) documenting serious adverse effects and higher death rates following mRNA vaccination. Yet on the same day as the study release, April 16, the World Health Organisation announced a legally binding agreement among its members (including New Zealand) on how to respond to future pandemics. Central to this agreement, which is set to be ratified in May, is the ‘sharing’ of drugs and vaccines between rich and poor nations. A better word than sharing might be proliferation.

The nature of life is to grow

How can it be that the world’s so-called medical experts have got it so wrong that they are still promoting a vaccination method which itself promotes cancer progression? The answer lies in a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of life. The discovery of DNA in 1953 has established a myth that the key to life has been discovered and nothing much more needs to be said about life’s abstract basis. This has shifted the focus of medical research onto a programme of editing DNA and then measuring what happens. An essentially destructive approach to life.

The deeper import of the discovery of DNA has somehow escaped the field of biotechnology. DNA is the physiological mechanism by which life perpetuates itself. Simply put ‘the nature of life is to grow’. ;Any process of editing DNA is going to try to perpetuate itself—almost the definition of cancer. The immune system is dedicated to defending the unique characteristics of an individual’s DNA. It corrects accidental mutations trillions of times over every 24 hour period. Given this situation, those researching DNA set themselves to solve the ‘problem(???)’ of how to defend their edits from being rejected by the immune system. In other words, how to give their edited version of DNA a chance to grow. To do so, they have experimented with means to evade or shut down natural immune responses (seehere for more discussion). Again we arrive at the door of cancer.

A study published in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience entitled “Expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cerebral Arteries: Implications for hemorrhagic stroke Post-mRNA vaccination” confirms just how successful they have been in perpetuating their rogue genetic edits. This study found the presence of COVID-19 spike protein in the cerebral arteries of almost half of female stroke victims up to 17 months post vaccination. This was accompanied by evidence of inflammatory cell infiltration. This finding reinforces the results of other studies which have located persistent spike protein in different areas of the physiology. The implication is clear, COVID-19 vaccine genetic sequences appear to effectively interfere with the long term genetic functioning of recipients. This is not a desirable or tolerable outcome.

Our cellular genetic system is remarkable. Every cell contains the whole genome, so the whole is contained in every part. Yet the whole is more than the sum of the parts.These principles of SCI do not just apply to a single organism, each species has cellular DNA at its basis. Together, the world of millions of types of organisms form a WHOLE network. There is a constant mutual exchange of influence, information and nourishment going on in this vast network, all based on the structural yet also dynamic intelligence contained in cellular genetics. Order is present everywhere in the system. It is not random. The whole system is grounded in the underlying laws of nature investigated by physics, but crucially it is also an expression of the supreme intelligence personified in consciousness. Thuslife is built up in layers on the ground of consciousness. The outer depends on inner.

The important thing to appreciate here is the wholesale assault on the order of natural law that is currently taking place. As we have reported, the genetic engineering of our food sources (grains and vegetables), food processing (using genetically modified microorganisms), organisms (animals and insects), medical interventions and cosmetics is undermining the holistic order in nature and in our lives. All of these modified elements are, according to the nature of genetic systems, vying with one another to survive, grow and take over existing natural processes. They are doing so, not holistically based on millions of years of mutually beneficial evolution, but incoherently and destructively based on millions of man made and computer generated DNA edits. This all points in one direction, genetic experimentation needs to stop. It has become a cancer rapidly growing throughout society and in the lives of individuals.

Very early on in the pandemic, eminent scientists like Robert Malone warned about this obvious possibility or rather inevitability, but their warnings went unheeded. Worse, efforts were made to undermine their credibility and cancel their public platform. By this time, vast pandemic profits were in prospect. Money and influence was expended to ensure these were realised. Now the WHO agreement wants to set this prospect in concrete. It needs to be opposed. Fortunately the US has withdrawn its funding from WHO, an example New Zealand needs to study very carefully. Our science policy needs to take account of scientific findings rather than ignore them.

So why aren’t studies like those cited above raising alarm bells in the media?

This year’s AUT (Auckland University of Technology) annual Trust in Media Survey found that only 32% of Kiwis trust the media most of the time, down from 53% in early 2020. Dr. Merja Myllylahti, co-director of the AUT Research Centre for Journalism, Media, and Democracy (JMAD), was interviewed this week by Jack Tame of TVNZ. She said criticism of media coverage during the pandemic was unfair because the media was not singing the government messaging (???) Myllylahti believes that media organisations are now doing a more transparent job of explaining what they are doing and correcting their mistakes(???) This lack of self-reflection was extraordinary and confronting. In a totally confusing interview, Myllylahti described open media debate in the US as chaos. Whereas we know that open access platforms like Substack and X are actually the information transfer and debating forums that have enabled us to share the results of scientific investigation that governments and vested interests have tried to hide from the public. Incredibly, Myllylanti said she has no idea why Kiwis don’t trust the media (LOL). Even denying there is any such thing as objectivity—almost a rejection of truth and a licence to ignore scientific findings. None of this was called out by Jack Tame who seemed oblivious to what was staring him in the face.

A test of truth needs three elements:

  • Personal experience—what happens to people
  • Scientific investigation—using logic and experimentation
  • Traditional use—does it last in time?

Initially government advisors uncritically accepted the advice from the pharmaceutical and biotech industry that mass vaccination would be safe and effective. Then they made a fatal error, they deliberately ignored or discounted the millions of reports of adverse effects. This meant they had rejected one of the foundational principles of knowledge—personal experience. Nor had long term safety been established, especially as gene therapy was known to have long term consequences. This was glossed over. Again, with fatal consequences which are still unfolding.

Pandemic policy didn’t have the required breadth of evidence to pass as knowledge. We were told to trust the science, but it wasn’t science that was being offered to us. Pandemic policy became an exercise in ideology, authority, publicity and profit to the detriment of public health. It still is. It is critical going forward to continue to question the faulty policies that WHO, governments, medical authorities, the media and others with vested interests are promoting. This is why the Hatchard Report has a policy of referencing published science, analysing logic and referencing traditional knowledge. We are in a fight for survival, we need to speak up.

Give Us Our Daily Bread, but Please Stop Genetically Modifying the Yeast

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Give Us Our Daily Bread, but Please Stop Genetically Modifying the Yeast

There is a poem written by Harry Baker

If ever I die and thee be not sure that I’m dead
Just put butter and jam on fresh baked bread
Then wave them vittles over me head
If my mouth don’t open, thee be sure that I’m dead

Appreciation of bread is a universal language. Cultures all over the world have their favourites—wholewheat, pita, lavash, chapati, sourdough, corn bread, pumpernickel, baguette. The list is long and people are very protective of their traditions and tastes.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

What is happening to bread today?

There are pure food laws in the EU designed to protect traditional recipes, ingredients and their names. Back in 2018 a study entitled “Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [naturally occurring yeast] metabolites produced during fermentation on bread quality parameters: A review” reported that baker’s yeast was not genetically modified saying “due to the fact that the majority of consumers in Europe highly reject the use of genetically modified microorganisms in the production of food, other strategies to improve bread quality must be investigated.” 

Eight years later, if you ask Google today ‘Is yeast free of GM ingredients?’, it will answer in the affirmative and refer you to the 2018 study. Whew! So why did I get a headache when I ate too many slices of toast for breakfast?

To get around the need to convince consumers that their bread was still pure and traditional. Bakers began a tradition of ‘flour improvers’. I say ‘bakers’, but I don’t actually mean bakers, I should have said chemists and biotechnologists because they are the ones designing our daily bread. (Just in passing, I wonder if we would trust the person who empties our septic tank to make our wedding cake?) These are lauded in PR blurbs as ingenious people who come up with creative solutions to problems (that don’t actually exist).

So-called flour improvers contain a cocktail of enzymes, oxidants, reducing agents, bleaching agents, emulsifiers and additives, many, if not most of which, are produced by batch fermentation processes using genetically modified microorganisms (GMMs).  Flour improvers contain: 

amylases, hemicellulases, transglutaminases, pentosanases, proteases, mono- and diglycerides, ascorbic acid, potassium bromate, benzoyl peroxide, chloride di-oxide, potassium iodate, chlorine, azodicarbonamide, L-cysteine hydrochloride, sodium metabisulphite, lipophilic glyceryl monostearate, sodium stearoyl lactylate, diacetyl tartaric acid esters of mono- and diglycerides, lecithin, lipoxygenase, xylanase, guar and xanthan gum, calcium propionate, acetic acid, vinegar, butylated hydroxyanisole, propylene glycol, tert-butylhydroquinone, aspartame, acesulfame potassium, sucralose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, sodium erythorbate and polyglycerol esters, along with so-called fortification additives including ferrous sulphate, calcium carbonate, zinc sulphate, thiamine hydrochloride, riboflavin, nicotinic acid, folic acid and vitamin A acetate.

This is not even a comprehensive list, I forgot to mention the agrochemical residues for example, but they are all permitted by the authorities supposed to be protecting our health who allow most of them to be lumped together on the label under the title ‘flour improvers’??? Their actual purpose is to ensure that supermarket bread can be produced uniformly and continuously in super quick time yet last the distance for long periods in a plastic bag at room temperature, all achieved using the cheapest possible ingredients through industrial scale mechanised processes. 

If you bake sourdough at home you will know that none of these ingredients are necessary for a successful product, although a little bit of practice and knowledge goes a long way.

The effect of this chemical cocktail on the consumer is really of little interest to those producing the bread. Many years ago I had a meeting with the CEO of one of New Zealand’s biggest bread makers, I was urging him to restart production of their discontinued organic bread line. He replied that consumers were not interested enough, and then confided in me that he never ate his company’s bread, he only bought artisan sourdough for home consumption. Seeing the above list of ingredients, I can see why:)

However, this does not stop the people responsible for marketing bread showing pictures of golden wheat blowing in the wind and basking in the sunshine along with made up stories about the miraculous health benefits of bread (if only it actually deserved the name bread) and yeast. A Stuff newspaper report quotes Ralph Thorogood, chairman of the Baking Industry Research Trust which represents the only two big companies making bread in New Zealand (both owned by overseas interests), argues that in principle commercial bakers don’t do anything different to what an artisan baker does saying: 

“Weighing up our ingredients, we mix them together in a large scale mixer the same as the craft bakery does. We take that dough and divide it into individual pieces. The craft baker does it by hand on a divider.” Yeah Right!!

Yeast is not what we are told it is

With those words of commercial wisdom, let us return to yeast itself. Over the years, our universities have trained a great many biotechnologists. These people all need a crust to live on and something to do with their lives. Stymied by the consumer preference in Europe for natural yeast, they worked with the marketing gurus to come up with an acceptable work around. Enter stage left ‘self cloned’ yeast, a term which was judged to be potentially acceptable to consumers, or rather might deceive them. Self cloned yeast is just genetically modified yeast with a deceptive name. It is widely used in bread making today and is rapidly replacing natural yeast. Of course the obliging regulators decided it doesn’t need to be identified as Genetically Modified (GM), after all it has a pretty enough name, no need to confuse fussy consumers. In the end the labels just say ‘yeast’.

Our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth” explains that all of the genetically modified processes which produce the multitude of ingredients in bread have one very concerning and scientifically verified problem—genetic contamination with DNA fragments that can take control of our physiological processes and potentially give us a headache and much worse.

So we have arrived at a crisis. The supermarket plastic fantastic loaf is off the table and that little packet of yeast we buy at the supermarket to put in our healthy bread maker at home is actually not healthy at all nor apparently only yeast nor even what we formerly called yeast. The answer lies in expensive artisan breads for those who can afford them, home made sourdough for those with the time, or with chapatis—unleavened breads you can make at home in ten minutes (not the store bought wraps or chapatis).

I know that this is all very challenging, depressing even, especially for busy people and families, but it is nonetheless happening to us. It is as if we have suddenly discovered that our familiar friends, upon whom we rely, are not our friends at all. Bread is just one example among thousands of convenience foods and drinks whose production processes are being genetically redesigned by biotechnologists and then deceptively marketed as ‘healthy, natural, precise, nourishing, and beneficial’ (poison, dare I say it).

Our digestive processes, our liver, our kidneys have to deal with the fallout everyday, but there are aspects of DNA contamination which can’t be easily managed. This puts a strain on our capacity to maintain optimum health. It can seriously degrade health. Multiple studies that we have often reported over the last few years point to an association between processed food consumption, chronic illness and cancer—conditions whose incidence is accelerating. So far the processed food industry has been hiding behind the complexity of the food chain, saying that there is no proven causation. This is a convenient cover for their lack of honesty, integrity, and disregard for consumer health, involving deceptive labelling, secretive changes to traditional foods and now genetic engineering of ingredients and processes.

The government is trying to pass the Gene Technology Bill which will remove GM labelling requirements, grant immunity from criminal responsibility, do away with any need for testing and encourage genetic experimentation with our food. A sort of harakiri for our traditional foods. Now is the time to speak up. Contact your local MP. Call for the Bill to be withdrawn. Call for all GM ingredients to be identified on labels. Call for an end to risky biotechnology experimentation. Call your supermarket. Don’t buy these unlabelled GM contaminated items and tell them why. Tell them to get different suppliers and different goods. We as consumers have a lot more power than we realise.

Where Have We Arrived in the Food Chain and Where Do We Go From Here?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Where Have We Arrived in the Food Chain and Where Do We Go From Here?

A study undertaken in the EU entitled “Pesticide residues with hazard classifications relevant to non-target species including humans are omnipresent in the environment and farmer residences” has found residues of more than 200 different pesticides in household dust across Europe. Most of the pesticide residues were hazardous to non-target species (that includes us humans), and some of the pesticides found were non-approved highly hazardous types. Pesticides were also detected in the air we breathe and the water we drink. It raises the question of forever chemicals accumulating relentlessly in the environment. Other sources of pollution include construction materials used in homes, traffic exhaust, plastic micro particles, etc. The cumulative effects are unknown but are suspected to significantly contribute to the rising incidence of diseases like cancer, allergies and inflammatory illness.

You are probably already aware of these sources of pollution. You may be taking care to avoid them as much as possible. For example you may prefer organic food—the study found lower levels of pollution in and around organic farms. Some of you may be taking your shoes off before entering the house. You may even live in a house constructed of natural materials in a remote area. You may try to avoid polyester. You may filter your household water supply. Despite all these personal measures, we are all facing rising levels of pollution with inadequately assessed consequences for our health.

Increasingly, the biggest sources of pollution in our lives are the pre-prepared foods we buy at the supermarket. The substitution of natural enzymatic processing aids with genetically engineered versions has increased not just the level of pollution but the type of hazard. Engineered versions are designed to be more long lasting and powerful in their action. Moreover, as we have reported in our article “Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth“, they are contaminated with antibiotics and antibiotic resistant bacterial strains as well as genetic promoters designed to catalyse cell proliferation.

For example, sauces and pickled condiments like chutneys, ketchup and mayonnaise contain acetic acid (Food Additive No. E260). Acetic acid is the main component of vinegar and is widely used in various food products as a flavour, acidity regulator and preservative. It used to be produced through a process of natural fermentation and was generally recognised as safe (GRAS) when consumed in reasonably small quantities. Now the majority is produced synthetically on an industrial scale, using genetic engineering. The changes introduced in the manufacturing process are manyfold, including: 

  • Artificial stimulation of the expression of the gene for pyrroloquinoline quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (PQQ-ADH), an enzyme.
  • Modifying acetogenic bacteria which enable acetic acid to be produced from a wider range of raw materials
  • Introducing high temperature tolerant modified bacterial genes

These processes inevitably involve residual contamination of the end food product including novel DNA along with associated health consequences that have not been studied or acknowledged by the processed food industry.  Patak’s Mango Chutney for example now includes E260 among its ingredients. We have stopped buying it. There is actually no need to include any E260. Herbs and spices supply enough flavour and its sugar content preserves long life. This is just one product among thousands that have been altered by genetically modified microorganisms.

Cooking has always involved processes, but until the chemical proliferation of the twentieth century these were naturally induced by boiling, decoction, precipitation, fermentation, dehydration, milling, etc or through the addition of natural herbs and products from plants and animals. Over millennia our physiology became accustomed to these, not just through repeated exposure, but because they involve natural DNA that echoed our own, with which we share long phylogenetic roots. Our digestion is able to naturally derive nourishment from these. Another word for nourishment or nutrition is the assimilation of order or intelligence.

The engineered genetic structures that are now accompanying processed foods contain man-made genetic sequences that are foreign to our digestion and physiology. The body has no history of assimilating these, nor would we want to. Genetic sequences initiate a completely different kind of pollution from chemicals, they contain instructions to carry out and control complex biological processes. They can potentially interface with parts of our physiology and overwhelm or take over other processes. Many of them are actually designed to do so during food processing but when ingested they can start similar foreign processes in our physiology. These can be very unhealthy, such as those genetically engineered to precipitate solids in solution used to make cheeses which might affect our blood, coronary and arterial systems, menstruation, haemorrhoids, varicose veins, circulation, brain blood supply, etc.

Importantly, genetic sequences are the physical counterparts of conscious processes. They are as if thoughts or memories, fragments of consciousness expressing itself. As we have reported here and here, studies show people receiving organ transplants can experience the preferences or desires of the donor. People receiving stem cells during bone marrow transplants can experience psychological difficulties. Contamination from synthetic genetically engineered sequences during food processing is a novel form of contamination whose consequences remain unresearched. 

However, the detailed long term consequences of mRNA vaccination are beginning to be examined. A 2025 study for example published in Molecular Systems Biology entitled  “Persistent epigenetic memory of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in monocyte-derived macrophages” reveals that mRNA jabs may cause a level of epigenetic rearrangement that challenges the immune system and its capacity to keep cancer at bay. 

So why haven’t we been reading much about this in mainstream media? Alex Berenson is an investigative reporter formerly of the NY Times, now writing on Substack.com using the handle Unreported Truths. Berenson’s site is proving to be a clearing house for leaked information from the scientific community. In some recent posts Berenson reveals that many scientists are aware of the problems with mRNA vaccines (they don’t work and cause a wide range of adverse effects) and are actively discussing them in closed sessions. But they are circling the wagons and refusing to go public with concerns. There is apparently too much at stake—funding, professional standing, in fact the validity of the whole gene therapy enterprise.

Fundamentally, the growing use of gene editing is knocking on the door of the absolute fundamental of life, the organising power of consciousness which expresses itself through genetic structures. If the biotech community and its corporate masters continue to roll out their plans for even more invasive and disruptive technologies, they will inevitably initiate more widespread damage than the pandemic has so far. The question is when will the penny drop and how far down the road to disaster will we have travelled by then? More to the point, how can we stop the out of control gene vehicle and get back from there?

There is no doubt in my mind that the ancient science of Ayurveda has encountered something similar in the past. The ancient record of the Mahabharata war five thousand years ago talks about human cloning and the disastrous consequences for the peace and stability of individuals, families and nations. Ayurveda offers rejuvenation therapies which enliven transformative processes inherent in our physiology to encourage a healthy aging process. Ancient Ayurvedic texts refer to procedures called Pancha Karma—five fold cleansing and Kayakalpa, literally ‘renewal of the body’. These approaches had been to a certain extent lost or distorted as a result of the persecution of traditional Indian medicine under British rule, but they are now beginning to be rediscovered. They are highly specific and exacting, a necessary feature of their success. The use of pure herbal ingredients, meditation techniques, and breathing exercises under the supervision of traditional experts is necessary. It may be that the world will need to look to the knowledge of Ayurveda kept alive in Indian family traditions for answers to the long term woes of genetic engineering, but be careful of pharmaceutical industries who are contaminating traditional medicine everywhere.

Today all that is still in the future, because the scientific community is paralysed by their own hubris, unable to own up to their mistakes or stop their programme of genetic experimentation. The Gene Technology Bill is set to open the door to disaster wider, the New Zealand Parliament is promising the earth but is actually sleep walking towards the zero hour. To use a coarse phrase, don’t piss on my door and tell me it is only rain. Contact your MP, they need waking up.

Sometimes Civilisations Are Overwhelmed by Their Own Excesses

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Sometimes Civilisations Are Overwhelmed by Their Own Excesses

If some of you are still thinking that the nation’s health is built on universal vaccination protocols you might examine the results of research more closely.

The Cleveland Clinic is a prestigious medical institution in Ohio. It is consistently ranked as one of the best hospitals in the United States. For the past twenty years in the fields of cardiology, heart, and vascular surgery, Cleveland Clinic has been ranked and regarded as the best and highest-performing hospital in the world. It requires regular vaccination for its 54,402 staff, but allows applications for exemptions on medical or religious grounds.

In 2024/25 it mandated the flu vaccine. In all, 43,857 staff (82%) received the vaccine. The remainder received exemptions and were unvaccinated. A study approved by the Clinic has just been published on MedRxiv under the title “Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season“. It examines the outcomes of the vaccination program over a 25 week period. It found:

“Over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. In an analysis adjusted for age, sex, clinical nursing job, and employment location, the risk of influenza was significantly higher for the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated state (HR, 1.27; 95% C.I., 1.07 – 1.51; P = 0.007), yielding a calculated vaccine effectiveness of −26.9% (95% C.I., −55.0 to −6.6%).”

In other words the flu shot predisposed its staff to become infected with influenza—a negative effectiveness. The results are challenging to the accepted flu vaccination protection paradigm.

Sometimes it is necessary to go back to basics to examine the fundamentals of what we believe in and what we do. A message that has never been more timely than today. Increasingly, public messaging is being based on belief, ideology and advertising tricks rather than science and common sense. The effect of this mistake is exacerbated by the rapid changes taking place in medicine, food and technology.

The slice of toast we are eating today could be quite different from that of last year, but the packaging might be unaltered.

An article entitled “Making genetically engineered food palatable“, just published by Chemistry World, the journal of the Royal Society of Chemistry, spills the beans. It promises that the latest round of genetically modified (GM) foods, about to be released following deregulation, will include “more aesthetically pleasing fruits and vegetables” that will boost vitamin content, have a longer shelf life and “make greens that actually taste delicious”???

According to the article, mega corporation Bayer (that acquired Monsanto in 2016 for US$66 billion) “is deeply attuned to what consumers are seeking” ??? It is marketing a CRISPR edited GM mustard green which has been stripped of its pungent bitter taste by a biotech startup called Pairwise. Bayer believes this has improved [bland?] flavour and nutrition which will make salad more appealing to consumers. The claim of higher nutritional value is based on nothing more than a suggestion from the CEO of Pairwise that the taste is so improved that consumers will eat more of it than traditional lettuce, because the ‘strong flavour’ has been removed. In other words, we will stuff our face with it in an effort to detect the taste.

Forget about this hype, the main reason Bayer is so excited is contained in this quote from the article:

“Bayer and Pairwise point out the genetically altered salad greens aren’t considered a genetically modified organism under the traditional understanding of a GMO – and this could make a big difference in how appealing these next-generation foods could be.”

Translating this into plain English, under the new GM regulations, or rather lack of them, there will be no requirement to label the switch. Consumers need not be told that the product is genetically altered. In other words, under the Gene Technology Bill here in New Zealand and similar deregulation overseas, gene edited foods using CRISPR will be classed as ‘natural’. A slight of hand that has Bayer rubbing its hands in glee. The UK Food Standards Authority (UKFSA) has also joined in saying that up until now consumers have been confusing gene-edited food with genetically modified food??? Luckily for us, any sense of confusion will all come to an end with the removal of any requirement for labelling. We won’t know what we are eating.

Those working in the biotech industry are at pains to point out that no one has found even a single case of an adverse effect of a GM food. A rather bold claim since it might also be said that no definitive comparison has ever been undertaken. Instead, the claim of safety is largely based on a rather loose comparison between the health of Americans who have unlabelled GM foods and Europeans where labelling has been required so far. According to this imperfect analysis published in 2016 by the National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine, which aims to promote US science, “there is no difference in patterns of cancer, diabetes, kidney diseases, autism or food allergies between the US and the EU”.

This is an absurd claim. According to multiple studies published in learned journals over the last decade, Americans enjoy some of the worst health statistics in the developed world. For example a 2023 report of the Commonwealth Fund concludes:

“The U.S. has the lowest life expectancy at birth, the highest death rates for avoidable or treatable conditions and the highest maternal and infant mortality.It has the highest rate of people with multiple chronic conditions and an obesity rate nearly twice the OECD average.”

As far as GM food is concerned, just a glance at these American health stats should raise alarm bells, but don’t worry, if you turn the other way and refuse to look, you won’t find anything to be concerned about.

So what exactly is Bayer planning for our dinner plates?

So far there have been two waves of genetic engineering of our food. The first involved GM crops. Out of the many wannabe entrants in the first wave, the main staples that have caught on globally are pest resistant and pesticide tolerant varieties of GM soy, canola and corn. Varieties of alfalfa, sugar beet and papaya are also grown in the US. These crops have all faced consumer resistance and are relatively easy to avoid if you choose foods labelled non-GMO. The second wave has involved wide spread gene engineering of food processing enzymes and additives. As we have reported in our article Major Health Alert: the Extraordinary Genetically Modified Invasion of Our Supermarkets by Stealth, this has escaped labelling requirements, yet studies show it has involved a significant degree of contamination with associated risks to health.

In addition to those already mentioned, a third wave consisting of gene-edited fruit and vegetables is being approved. These are unlabelled and are just beginning to hit markets. Including:

  • GABA enriched Tomatoes from Sanatech seeds, 
  • Non-browning Avocados and Salad Greens from GreenVenus, 
  • Long shelf life Purple Tomato from Norfolk ‘Healthy’ Produce, 
  • Powdery mildew resistant Grapes from VitisGen3
  • So-called Conscious Salad Greens from Pairwise
  • Seedless Blackberries from Pairwise
  • Arctic Apples from Okanagan Specialty Fruits
  • Summer Squash and Zucchini from Bayer
  • White Button Mushroom from Yinong Yang
  • BG25 GM Potato from SPS International 
  • Golden Rice from Bayer and Syngenta

These varieties are just a small fraction of the GM types under development. Some of the above are already approved in New Zealand, including Golden Rice and Arctic Apples for example, but have not yet reached our supermarket shelves probably because of current GM labelling requirements. That is all about to change. They are now set to escape labelling requirements under the provisions of the Gene Technology Bill in New Zealand and similar legislation elsewhere. The explosive proliferation of GM foods is taking off due to the use of generative AI technology which drives research by designing experimental gene edits. Complimenting this, large companies now have been gifted another weapon for their marketing arsenal. They can simply use their profits to incentivise governments and farmers in order to take over market share without having to negotiate consumer choice, all courtesy of biotech deregulation—a potentially cosy financial relationship.

As a result, our supermarket basket and even an innocent looking packet of seeds for the home garden are rapidly becoming objects of suspicion and deceit.

Consumption of traditional fresh natural fruit and vegetables and whole foods is known to be associated with longevity and health. Multiple studies have found reduced incidence of the main killers—cancer, heart disease and inflammatory conditions. Mega corporations are now moving to control this sector and replace heritage types with patented GM varieties. The potential health outcomes are unknown, but the hype is in full swing. The UKSFA is quoted as saying consumers perceive the new generation of CRISPR gene-edited foods as “safer and more natural”???Alexander Gutmann, spokesperson for Bayer, told Chemistry World “I wouldn’t consider making food healthier or making food tastier as vanity”. This is PR messaging for our consumption, softening us up to believe. It is not based on anything other than a desire to capture markets and manipulate consumers.

The writer of the article in Chemistry World, unabashedly promoting the ‘virtues’ of GM food, is Kristina Megget who announces herself as follows: “I have been empowering people to believe in themselves to become the people they want to be and achieve their goals and dreams since the start of 2023.”

I trust you are seeing what I see, we are in danger of sinking under the weight of misguided faith in biotechnology along with unalloyed greed for profit and market control. Agriculture, food and medicine have become dominated and completely transmuted by biotech processes and products, but there are few if any attempts to critically assess health outcomes. These people have no shame, their use of the words ‘natural’ and ‘healthy’ are misleading and appear sinister in intent. A big shout out today for the Cleveland Clinic, who measured some results and had the courage to publish. We could all do with a dose of reality before we are overwhelmed by deceptive biotech assumptions and practices, cast adrift from any realistic assessment of health outcomes.

Warning—the Gene Technology Bill Will Bypass Public Health Protections and Initiate an All Out War on Our Humanity

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Warning—the Gene Technology Bill Will Bypass Public Health Protections and Initiate an All Out War on Our Humanity

First we set out the background, later we will draw out the implications as we stand on the threshold of an unfettered era of biotech experimentation.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

An article in the 28th March NY Times is entitled Top F.D.A. Vaccine Official Resigns, Citing Kennedy’s ‘Misinformation and Lies’. It reports the ‘resignation’ of Dr Peter Marks, who led the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), which authorised and monitored the safety of vaccines and a wide array of other treatments, including cell and gene therapies. In a statement, Dr. Marks attacked Robert F. Kennedy Jnr., Health and Human Services Secretary, writing “It has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary, but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.” This was a smoke screen.

The truth of the matter is rather different. To put it bluntly, Marks was sacked. During the pandemic, Marks overrode safety concerns expressed by senior members of his staff and granted emergency approval for COVID-19 vaccines. He also spearheaded the drive to approve COVID-19 vaccines for children. Marks is not actually a vaccinologist, yet he was overriding the advice of staff more qualified than himself. He went further, in 2021 he ousted Dr. Gruber and Dr. Krause, the top scientists at the Office of Vaccine Research, due to “intransigence” of these real vaccine experts to not ram through the approval of COVID-19 vaccines. Drs. Gruber and Krause had voiced concerns that they needed more time to understand the safety of the vaccine especially as it relates to inflammation of the heart, now a well known and accepted toxicity of the COVID-19 vaccines. 

It went wider than that, using its masterly grasp of understatement, the Times article admitted “[Marks] had come under criticism for being overly generous to companies that sought approvals for therapies with mixed evidence of a benefit.’ In fact, Marks had routinely approved gene products which had failed trials and which had shown a high risk of product failure and/or adverse effects. In other words, Marks was well known at the agency for cutting safety corners in a way that would benefit pharmaceutical/biotech companies and/or facilitate the political agenda of the Biden administration. Marks approved the use of COVID-19 vaccines for children despite the known fact that children have an extremely low risk of serious health effects of COVID-19 infection and yet a known significant increased risk of serious vaccine related toxicity.

Among other cases, Marks approved muscular dystrophy drug ELEVIDYS which had failed to reach a patient benefit threshold and caused liver failure in 22% of recipients and a death. He also approved Alzheimer’s treatment ADUHELM against the strident objections of his staff and advisory board, a drug with a clear lack of efficacy which carried risk of serious toxicity including brain swelling and bleeding that could be life threatening. Marks’ approval of ADUHELM was subsequently rescinded and a congressional inquiry found there were ‘unusually close’ interactions with Biogen, the drug’s developer.

The significance of Marks’ sacking needs to be understood. Under US law vaccine manufacturers enjoy freedom from any liability if a vaccine is approved for emergency use. That immunity lapses when the vaccine is included on the adult vaccine register, but is reinstated if the vaccine becomes part of the childhood vaccine schedule. Marks’ personal decisions at the FDA, against the advice of agency experts, have effectively shielded COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers from liability.

We can now turn to the Gene Technology Bill currently before Parliament here in New Zealand. The Bill appoints a Regulator to take decisions approving biotechnology experimentation, GM crops, biotech medicines and procedures, etc. A position not dissimilar to that of Marks at the FDA. The Bill also includes Clause 187—Protection from Civil and Criminal Liability which shields the regulator, his staff, employees, advisors, etc from any liability for their decisions. In effect, the Bill is introducing a system that is wide open to the type of manipulation that Marks undertook at the FDA

At the weekend, we released an article entitled “Weight loss drug enables you to swap one disease for dozens of others“. The day after our release the Trump administration announced the cancellation of Medicare funding for weight loss drugs, apparently in response to the high rate of side effects. In complete contrast and against the run of evidence, we reported that Wegovy has just been approved in New Zealand for weight loss despite the growing international record of serious side effects. New Zealand Associate Health Minister David Seymour MP commented that he wants to hurry up the approval of new drugs. Opening our regulators to the kind of pressure that the Biden administration put on the FDA which led to the deadly fiascos overseen by Marks. 

The New Zealand Gene Technology Bill sets out the most permissive biotechnology regime in the world. The net effect of clauses in the Gene Technology Bill and ramped up political pressure will be to bypass standard precautionary drug safety principles and hurry the approval and use of unsafe ineffective drugs. A repeat of pandemic policy decisions taken by poorly informed politicians, their advisors and medical authorities. No wonder they want to include a clause in the Gene Technology Bill freeing them from any civil or criminal liability. We are really curious how our politicians managed to get their head into a space where they boast they are improving public health, yet all those involved need a blanket protection from any liability whatsoever?

The Bill before Parliament is no routine piece of legislation, it deals with the deregulation of experiments which alter the foundation of life. The Bill is so permissive that a great many types of biotech experiments using CRISPR gene editing are being automatically waved through without even having to pass the desk of the regulator. In addition, products and procedures approved by overseas regulators are mandated for approval here in New Zealand, no questions asked. 

There is a very big problem with this approach. CRISPR gene editing is not working in the way that was anticipated ten years ago when there was talk of it tackling society’s biggest killers: cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. But despite billions of dollars, dozens of startup launches, and some advances, that dream feels further away than ever, reports the biotech and pharma business news site Endpoints News. In fact scientists ignored early warning signs that were reported in Nature as far back as 2018 when authors Michael Kosicki, Kärt Tomberg and Allan Bradley delivered their warning in unmistakable terms:

“In the clinical context of editing many billions of cells, the multitude of different mutations generated makes it likely that one or more edited cells in each protocol would be endowed with an important pathogenic lesion. Such lesions may constitute a first carcinogenic ‘hit’ in stem cells and progenitors, which have a long replicative lifespan and may become neoplastic with time.”

“We found that changes in the DNA have been seriously underestimated before now,” Bradley, a professor at Britain’s Wellcome Sanger Institute, told Reuters. “And anyone thinking of doing this in humans should proceed with great caution.”

Instead of heeding the warnings, scientists went ahead and facilitated a truly reckless era of experimentation that initiated a global pandemic.

Our genes form an information system which reaches back through the generations into the far distant past, back to the beginning of time. All of life’s lessons learned are stored in our genes, those that involve health, intelligence, food, happiness, the whole of life as we know it. Lines of ancestry are threads of knowledge. Thrown together in society they form the shared knowledge base of our civilization. Genes are not the kind of history found in dusty libraries, but a living presence preserving and promoting life utilising the life lessons of the past. Genes also reach down their roots into the smallest time and distant scales of the universe, they are continuously connected with the universal laws of nature promoting Cosmic evolution. Because of this, genes are not just personal, they are part of an interconnected network of information that supports life as we know it.

Thus genes form a Cosmic switchboard connected to the ocean of natural law—the knowledge base of the universe. Performing untold trillions of actions with a frequency and reach right down to the infinitesimal Planck scale of 10-43 seconds and 1.6 x 10-35 meters. Beyond that even, into the self-referral structure of the unified level of natural law, which is identical with the field of consciousness.

Knowledge is structured in consciousness. Society is a vast play of knowledge taking place within the unbounded ocean of consciousness. Thus our genes play a crucial role in enabling us to enjoy the support of the ultimate reality.

Knowledge has organising power. Genetic structures, being the means to connect with knowledge, have organising power. Genetic sequences are not static, it is their nature to perform actions. Once edited, our past is rewritten, novel genetic sequences can initiate entirely alien processes. Edited genetic structures are outside of the evolved web of genetic knowledge integrated across history, time and space and connected with universal consciousness. Thus they can destabilise reality. During the last five years we have had a brief glimpse into the power of genetic experimentation to undermine human health and civilisation. The chaotic state of the world today is no accidental happenstance. It is just the beginning of a war on humanity.

This is a war like no other ever imagined. This is not the type of global war we have been fearing, but something more insidious and even more pervasively harmful.  As we have reported, for years public relations firms working for pharmaceutical giants and biotech startups have been preparing the ground, deceiving the public into thinking that this is a war on ill health and a gateway to a bright future of long life and happiness. To achieve this deception, it has been necessary to paper over the cracks by hiding the published scientific facts and ignoring the abject failures. It has been necessary to stifle open debate, as Dr Peter Marks did at the FDA, as our government working with the media did in New Zealand, as the medical authorities achieved by silencing doctors asking questions.

The New Zealand Gene Technology Bill opens the door wide. Whether the people promoting this Bill know what they are doing or not, their actions are challenging the rule of natural law, the great Cosmic order which begins with universal consciousness which is a most treasured experience and highest attainment of human life. No wonder they want protection from civil and criminal liability. But there is another kind of law—Cosmic law. One thing leads to another, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. As you sow so shall you reap. The destruction of the delicately balanced web of genetic order will inevitably initiate a downward spiral for those who participate. This is a time to hold onto the self. A time to hold on to natural law. A time to remember the lessons of the past. A time to value cultural and traditional knowledge. A time to eat wisely. A time to speak up before it is too late. Not a time to leap off the edge into the unknown darkness below.

Some people are thinking the Gene Technology Bill can be adjusted. Perhaps a few more safeguards or restrictions on open field crops. They are imagining this as just a routine piece of legislative business. This is not the case, it is a bridge too far deep into enemy territory. Closer examination of the promised benefits and faux scientific justifications shows them to be out of date, misleading or just plain false. The Gene Technology Bill needs to be abandoned.

Weight Loss Drug Enables You to Swap One Disease for Dozens of Others

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Weight Loss Drug Enables You to Swap One Disease for Dozens of Others

The New Zealand Government has announced the approval of weight loss drug Wegovy.

In an interview with the Herald, Associate Health Minister David Seymour (soon to be our Deputy PM) welcomed the move, but said the process of approving medicines in New Zealand remains too slow. He said the approval of Wegovy is “very exciting” and continued “it will be a game changer for a lot of people”. Seymour enthused that the drug will prevent people going to hospital and overall save our health system money.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

Over in America, where weight loss drugs have become a part of the weird celebrity scene, a significantly different story is unfolding that Seymour has inexplicably missed. The results of a 2025 study of 215,000 users conducted at Washington University has been published by Nature Medicine under the title “Obesity drugs: huge study identifies new health risks“. Whilst confirming that the injectable drugs can assist weight loss and reduce the impact of a number of associated illnesses such as stroke, heart disease and diabetes, they described the risk reduction as modest. Significantly, researchers found a wide range of serious adverse effects. These included a doubled risk of pancreatitis, an 11% increase in the risk of arthritis and an elevated risk of low blood pressure and serious kidney disease.

The Washington University researchers warned that the adverse effects can be “very severe” and “need to be recognised”. The full list of side effects reads like a veritable Who’s Who of disease. Contrary to Seymour’s promise that Wegovy could start to empty our hospitals, the UK Daily Mail reported in January that the number of people in hospital as a result of weight loss drug side effects has rocketed.

This appears to be another case of the long term adverse effects of novel drugs starting to kick in as their popularity and length of use increases. The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) records that 400 people have been hospitalised with weight loss drug side effects so far with the most recent numbers soaring by 46% in one month alone.

More worrying still, a January study published in JAMA Ophthalmology is entitled “Ophthalmic Complications Associated With the Antidiabetic Drugs Semaglutide and Tirzepatide” It examines the reports of blindness following weight loss drug use. An article in the NY Post published on March 8 is entitled “We went blind after using weight-loss drugs like Ozempic and Mounjaro”. It reports that one US firm of Attorneys alone has received hundreds of GLP-1 (the main ingredient of weight loss drugs) medication and vision loss cases. A 56 year old mechanic from New Jersey told the paper: “I’ve been a mechanic my whole life but I can’t do anything with my hands anymore,” said Norris, who stopped taking Mounjaro around July 2024 but still has significantly impaired vision.

The growing prevalence of a wide range of adverse effects highlights one possible effect of the New Zealand Gene Technology Bill. The Bill mandates that drugs approved in two overseas medical jurisdictions will be automatically approved here. This raises the spectre of misleading patient information and widespread unforeseen health problems, as happened during the pandemic. Informed consent is increasingly missing in action in New Zealand as health authorities appear to be taking a “we always recommend the best drug” approach, rather than rigorously informing patients of their options and the risks.

Automatically reaching for a prescription drug along with the acceptance of adverse effects have both become normalised to the detriment of public health. Obesity is an area crying out for more considered attention. It is easy to dismiss the condition as solely the result of over eating or as some would term it ‘lack of self control’, but while these factors are highly significant and known to be controlled through lifestyle changes including exercise, diet, meditation and counselling, recent research implicates another critical factor. A 2022 study entitled “Obesity—an unexplained epidemic” published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition identifies industrial food production as playing a central role in the growth of obesity since the year 2000.

Approval of a weight loss drug is not a permanent remedy for obesity, it might just be another step along a route to industrial food, risky drugs and the proliferation of chronic disease. The Gene Technology Bill will deregulate the production and use of many genetically altered foods which, as we have reported here and here, are subject to high levels of contamination. Lack of provision in the Bill for testing, labelling and traceability will leave the public in the dark about what they are buying and eating and the possible effects.

There is currently a political storm in New Zealand over the repugnant social media posts of a Green MP, it is worth reflecting that the MP involved has virtually no political power or influence and therefore his worrying behaviour is unlikely to cause any lasting harm to the general population. The hullabaloo is legitimate, yet we shouldn’t lose sight of the actions of the current government whose Gene Technology Bill is set to have a lasting impact on the health and well being of the whole population and that of future generations. It is those who wield real political and regulatory power in the government whose decisions can cause widespread harm to public health, especially if they fail to complete their due diligence or keep up to date with research findings.

New Zealand Government Initiates Moves to Delete People Asking Medical Questions

Guy Hatchard
-
0
New Zealand Government Initiates Moves to Delete People Asking Medical Questions

Even When Backed by Science.

New Zealand physician Dr. Sam Bailey has had her medical registration rescinded along with an award of legal costs and fines totalling $158,000. The charges levelled against Bailey are detailed in an article in Stuff newspaper. The Medical Professional Conduct Committee submitted that the positions Bailey took in her YouTube videos were “not in the realm of legitimate scientific debate”, had the “hallmarks of conspiracy theory” and contained “deliberate efforts to undermine or discredit the official position and experts”.

Following the case of another doctor who raised concerns about the health effects of McDonald’s menus, ACT Leader David Seymour and the Health Minister Simeon Brown have issued a diktat limiting public servants in the medical sector from opposing the government no matter if their concerns are valid or not. Seymour is the Minister for Regulation and the Associate Minister of Health, Finance, and Education who mid year, will become Deputy Prime Minister. He announced that he and Brown are “putting muppets back in their box”.

So what did Dr. Sam Bailey actually say that was so offensive to the government that they are seeking to further curtail free speech? Were her questions out of the realm of legitimate scientific debate? According to the Stuff article the main charges were:

1. Bailey was accused of questioning the accuracy and appropriateness of PCR testing of COVID-19. A 2021 article available on PubMed is entitled “Analytical Performance of COVID-19 Detection Methods (RT-PCR): Scientific and Societal Concerns“. It concludes “According to several reports, the diagnostic accuracy of many of the currently available RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 may be lower than optimal, as false-positive, and false-negative results are seen in a small but significant proportion of individuals.”

2. Bailey said the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine had a short development and testing timeline. She said it “was not a safe product” and alleged people had been dying as a result. A 2024 study entitled “COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals” concluded “This multi-country analysis confirmed pre-established safety signals for myocarditis, pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. Other potential safety signals that require further investigation were identified.”

3. Bailey suggested the COVID-19 fatality rate was much lower than suggested by official figures. A 2021 study entitled “Case fatality rate of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis” concluded “The present review results highlighted the need for transparency in testing and reporting policies and denominators used in case fatality rate (CFR) estimation. It is also necessary to report the case’s age, sex, and the comorbidity distribution of all patients, which are essential in comparing the CFR among different segments of the population.”

4. Bailey was critical of some figures among the medical establishment. For example she said “Unfortunately, scientists like Dr. Siouxsie Wiles seem to have become detached from the very nature of human health as they focus on molecular test results and top-down political policies.” Dr Wiles is a high profile advocate of masking, vaccines and lockdowns. A 2022 article in Frontiers journal is entitled “Side-Effects of Public Health Policies Against Covid-19: The Story of an Over-Reaction“. It concluded “Our article has highlighted just some of the many side effects of Non Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) that have been adopted by our governments since the COVID-19 crisis began. Even in a terrible epidemic, decisions cannot be taken without an exhaustive risk-benefit analysis, not to mention consideration of civil liberties.”

5. Dr Bailey suggested that our body’s ‘terrain’ was more important than the effect of viral infection or germs when determining potential COVID-19 outcomes. Terrain theory is a controversial offshoot of functional medicine, but the assertion that pre-existing health conditions are crucial determinants of COVID-19 outcomes is clearly mainstream science with multiple scholarly references. A 2022 study entitled “COVID-19 mortality is associated with pre-existing impaired innate immunity in health conditions“. It concludes: “Our results suggest that impaired innate immunity in pre-existing health conditions is associated with increased hazard of COVID-19 mortality. The discovered molecular risk factors are potential prognostic biomarkers and targets for therapeutic intervention.”

Our intention above is to highlight the fact that from the outset of the pandemic, the substance of the charges laid against Dr. Bailey were in fact the subject of genuine scientific debate and continue to be so up to the present. Whether you agree with Dr. Bailey or not, her assertions were similar to questions being widely discussed and investigated by mainstream scientists. 

Has Dr. Bailey been the subject of an unjustified prosecution?

Dr Bailey has been convicted on seven counts of being a ‘discredit to the medical profession’ and a person whose public statements have the ‘hallmarks of conspiracy theory’. Not too far from the accusations that female herbalists (witches) routinely faced in early modern Scotland. To support this extraordinary conviction, the Health Practitioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal (HPDT) hired a so-called expert in misinformation—research fellow Dr Sanjana Hattotuwa. Dr. Hattotuwa is based in Sri Lanka, where he began work as a democracy activist and is now working at the Centre for Policy Alternatives. He studied for a PhD in Social Media and Politics from the University of Otago in 2021. 

He is cited on the website of the “Center for the Study of Organised Hate” based in Washington DC whose director is Raqib Hameed Naik, a Kashmiri journalist. Its focus is combating extremism, radicalisation, disinformation, violence and hate speech around the world. Hattotuwa was formerly the director of the now defunct Disinformation Project set up by the Ardern government with the possible intention of censoring media coverage of COVID-19 policy. 

Hattotuwa has had some previous public exposure in New Zealand where he shared the effect of reading disinformation on personal cleanliness. He explained to a TVNZ audience that he needs to take long showers at the conclusion of the day in order to wash off the effects of disinformation. The show pictured him in the shower so we know that he is speaking the truth. I did an AI google search entitled “Scholarly articles, do showers wash away the effects of disinformation?”. It replied “It looks like there aren’t many great matches for your search” which just goes to show the limitations of AI. If only Dr. Sam Bailey had taken more showers.

In response to questions from the NZ Herald about the costs and fines levelled against Bailey, Medical Council chairwoman, Dr Rachelle Love, said the case’s legal costs included preparation for hearings, gathering evidence, paying for expert opinions, and ensuring that the process was fair and thorough. She cited the complexity of the case and the need to be fair and thorough. Am I missing something here? You tell me.

Even epidemiologist Dr. Michael Baker, another government COVID-19 spokesperson whose public statements Bailey also questioned, believes our government has gone too far in suppressing free speech on medical topics saying: “Having to go through a centralised vetting process, which will be risk averse and potentially politicised, will ultimately reduce the ability of our system to respond to public health issues.” The New Zealand Parliament under Ardern and now Luxon has shown itself unable to tolerate questions. The main loser has been the New Zealand public who if they followed the government experts should be making sure they don’t read too much scientific literature and just in case, take a great many more (now compulsorily fluoridated) showers.

A Strange Mental Illness is Spreading via Infected Information Networks

Guy Hatchard
-
0
A Strange Mental Illness is Spreading via Infected Information Networks

An article published by the UK Daily Mail on March 17th is entitled “One of the first to suggest Covid was created in a lab, biologist Alina Chan faced death threats and was branded a ‘race traitor’. Now she tells IAN BIRRELL… ‘There was a real conspiracy among very powerful scientists. The cover-up was morally repugnant” The story is unfolded at length and well worth the time spent reading it. Our article today discusses how this could have happened and why similar tropes are continuing to influence public opinion to this day.

Listen to the Audio version here.

From the outset, anyone who even suggested that the investigation of the origin of COVID-19 should include the possibility that COVID-19 came from a lab that faced censorship, ridicule, and professional ostracism. It is now well known this was an organised campaign by a cabal of some of the world’s leading scientists apparently anxious to avoid any blame. They went so far as to use their influence as a ‘trusted source’ and their position in society to undermine, discredit and suppress the early lab leak conclusions of the secret services of many countries. Simultaneous with their publication of fraudulent papers promoting a zoonotic origin, these same scientists were exchanging emails between themselves admitting that the lab origin of COVID-19 was far and away the most plausible explanation.

As you know, we have written revealing snippets of this story before, but among the interesting new features which are emerging now are the apologies being offered by journalists who were deceived into writing articles which supported the zoonotic origin and also attacked those asking questions. It is about time our New Zealand papers followed suit and came clean. 

Media outlets have begun to admit error

On March 16th the NY Times, which was an early enthusiastic champion of a zoonotic origin, published an article entitled “We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives“. It reports that 77 Nobel Laureates and 31 scientific societies were involved in the cover up that included deliberately planning to mislead journalists. Alarmingly, the article warns that risky research on deadly pathogens is still going on at Wuhan whose early results are reported in a 2025 paper published by the journal Cell. The NY Times believes we should all be very worried about this, especially because the research is continuing under an inadequately low lab safety protocol (BSL-2 plus). 

Extraordinarily, some of the scientists involved in the cover up are still making key decisions that affect us all. Jeremy Farrar, now chief scientist at the World Health Organisation (WHO), instructed the authors of a paper that was subsequently published by Nature: they should specifically rule out a lab origin. Lord Vallance, now the UK Government’s Science Minister, quashed the conclusion of MI6 Chief Sir Richard Dearlove that a lab leak origin was 100% certain.

Despite signs of awakening among some media outlets, misleading scientific papers, which exclusively promoted a zoonotic origin and attacked anyone suggesting a lab leak, have still not been retracted. For example such papers at Nature Medicine, the Lancet, and our own Te Punaha Matatini are still up online uncorrected by the subsequent revelations, reliable data and analysis. Moreover some doctors who were leading the charge to suppress questions about vaccine safety are trying to reposition themselves as ‘trusted sources’ by reinterpreting pandemic history. Don’t be fooled. The mea culpas are skin deep only.

Zero Hedge has published an article entitled “Dr. Leana Wen Admits Some COVID ‘Conspiracy Theories’ Were Actually True“. From early on in the pandemic, Wen took a harsh stance on vaccine dissent during her regular appearances on CNN as a medical analyst, her opinion pieces for the Washington Post and her time as a guest contributor for NPR, PBS, BBC, and MSNBC, where she called for severe restrictions on the unvaccinated. She now admits that COVID-19 vaccines among other things caused menstrual difficulties and says “Covid dissenters should have been able to ask questions” and that she would have answered them. A faux apology with a hollow ring. No doubt she misses those heady days when she shone in the international media limelight.

All this wisdom of hindsight hides the fact that the same people apologising today and telling us they were misled were actually given the evidence at the time but ignored it. NY Times reporter Donald McNeil Jnr. is now complaining bitterly that he was deliberately fooled into believing the zoonotic origin. Saying in a Telegraph interview that “he became sceptical of the hypothesis the virus was engineered in a Wuhan lab after several top epidemiological virologists insisted it wasn’t possible”. McNeil said their efforts to throw him “off track” influenced the newspaper’s coverage of the theory and likely contributed to the topic being “dropped” for a year. In his book The Wisdom of Plagues, McNeil said the scientists “clearly misled me early on” and he was a “victim of deception”. In fact McNeil was told at the time by no less a person than renowned microbiologist Richard H Ebright that the research at Wuhan was ‘like looking for a gas leak with a lighted match’. McNeil should have looked deeper, no excuses.

How distorted information networks manipulate us 

The situation gives us an insight into how information networks influence us in the modern era. There are such massive amounts of information circulating out there today that people rely on so-called trusted sources to tell them what to think and say. The media, governments, science communities, health authorities, PR companies, pharmaceutical giants and intelligence services all know how this works and have shown themselves prepared to distort the truth, manipulate trusted sources and exploit information networks to serve their own ends. (To find out more about network behaviour read The Human Network—How We’re Connected and Why it Matters by Mathew O. Jackson).

As is the case for hypnosis, there are ranges of susceptibility to being influenced. Susceptibility can be greatly enhanced through the manipulation of multiple information sources simultaneously. Simply put, if there are a small enough number of influential trusted sources relied upon by the public, misleading statements deliberately sent by a very very small number of ‘experts’ to target these sources can overwhelm or rapidly transform public conversations and crowd out contrary opinions. In other words, people hear the same story over and over again from multiple sources despite the fact that it originates from a single source. This results in an extreme bias which over reflects the views of the single source. Precisely what happened to the public discussions about COVID-19 origins and vaccine safety.

As regards the source of COVID-19, the situation was farcical from the start. The source of the outbreak was so obvious from the beginning, that it is hard to know how anyone could say it came from an animal with a straight face. Yet the surge of information designed to influence the media was so overwhelming that many so-called trusted news sources like the BBC are still sticking to the story that we may never know where COVID-19 came from. As if they are standing on their doorstep looking out and then someone appears by their side and they wonder where they came from. Of course they came from inside the house, there was nowhere else they could have come from.

COVID-19 vaccine messaging was designed to mislead

The mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safe and effective messaging was equally overwhelming. The pharmaceutical industry was already highly practiced at influencing decisions through its control of information networks and regulatory practices. Medicines regulatory bodies worldwide, like our Medsafe, are linked together by ICMRA (International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities) and WHO databases funded by the pharmaceutical industry. These databases electronically and instantly provide ready made opinions, rules and so-called facts that the national bodies adopt without sufficient forethought or investigation. This in turn compromises the advice they give to governments and the media which now carries with it the authoritative trusted Medsafe stamp of approval and authenticity. This message is relayed to the public through the multiple channels enlivened by Medsafe. This then becomes the subject of multiple private conversations which are reinforced when it becomes apparent that our overseas contacts all have reached the same conclusions (because they too have been influenced by the same fraudulent sources). Hey presto, it now appears almost idiotic and antisocial to hold any differing opinion.

It is important to note that the information originally circulated through ICMRA and WHO and then reposted by for example five eyes intelligence partners, medical networks, media articles and search engines was moulded to be highly specific and restrictive. It was designed to head off any vaccine hesitancy or criticism in advance and to overwrite any embarrassing facts that might run counter to the safe and effective narrative. From the outset a very short list of possible vaccine side effects was promulgated. This meant that the very obvious fact that millions of people around the world were reporting a wide range of serious illnesses following COVID-19 vaccination could be ignored or even condemned as hysteria or imagination.

The effect of this misinformation has been devastating. For example the UK Telegraph reports that the NHS has paid an American consulting company to assess claims for vaccine damage compensation. Of the 13,000 applicants, only a paltry 203 have been awarded any compensation. As a result, in total the US consultants have been paid more than the victims. This has only been possible because of the myths spread widely by ICMRA, WHO, and other so-called trusted sources that COVID-19 vaccines were inherently safe. In other words, the facilitators have been rendered blind by the perpetrators. They remain brainwashed by an information network so saturated by misinformation that they cannot change their opinions in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. You may reasonably conclude that those in positions of authority or influence unable to change their minds at this point are exhibiting symptoms akin to obsessive compulsive mental states or psychopathy.

Don’t be fooled by media sources who have conceded one small point of misinformation, pleading that they were misled. If they were really serious about correcting the situation, they would be publishing articles everyday asking questions and revealing the true extent of the gaslighting. They would be demanding help for the victims. They would be asking why biotechnology labs are still conducting research to make viruses more infectious and deadly and why governments are proposing to deregulate biotechnology and do away with testing and labelling. Don’t be fooled by medical experts who say we got it wrong then, but now we are back on track. Their paradigm and agenda remains unchanged. There is still a way to go before we are safe from the mad beliefs about genetic manipulation and transhumanism that have come to dominate the arrogant and money hungry biotech sector.

The way ahead in the information age

In the modern age, information has been mistaken for knowledge. To chart a way ahead, we have to understand that there is no end to information. During a visit to any library it becomes obvious that not all the books can be read, let alone remembered and not all of them are true. The information in the books remains in the books, what to speak of the information contained in computers. The authentic personal means of gaining knowledge is through the five senses, the mind and the intellect. Sorting out truth from falsehood involves personal experience, logic and traditional understanding. Our capacity to successfully navigate this path requires self-reflective consciousness.

Information networks have become imbalanced, they are easily influenced by a few sources. This is possible because too many people have given too much trust to information they receive via personal communication devices whose content has been narrowed down by algorithms controlled by AI with the intention of influencing content exposure. In essence, anonymous people or interests are controlling our reality. Sideways communication between social network members (that’s us) has become dominated by the controlled content. In effect, a closed controlled information network is created. 

Networks operated by physical laws are truly balanced. They can only be represented by multidimensional diagrams. They are safe by virtue of their interlocking multifaceted design rooted in their fundamentally unified self-referral supersymmetric source. The gravitation of the sun is at the centre of the solar system, but the planets interact with each other and also to a small extent have a reciprocal influence on the sun. Moreover the laws of nature involved operate from a silent abstract and universal space. All living systems rely on the continuous flow of information within their networks. Whereas entropy or disorder increases in closed systems, in open living systems order increases.

Administrative systems which try to centralise power, discourage or control lateral communications, and close off the population from influences outside the network boundaries are doomed to fail. These inward looking systems of administration will not be able to maintain themselves. They inevitably start to fall apart, as is happening now. Essentially, the administration of global problems has to cede elements of decision-making to a broader knowledge network that is more likely to make valid decisions.

To create this knowledge network, an extended period of self discovery is required. The full potential of the silent abstract universal field of natural law can be realised and harnessed in the least excited state of consciousness which is identical with the source of all the laws of Nature. The effect of balanced networks can be very powerful and rapid. History records the upsurge of creativity during the renaissance or philosophy during the enlightenment. Archeological records of ancient civilisations evidence periods of high learning and prosperity. A period of revival of knowledge and a social phase transition has already begun. The best way to navigate the vast changes that are set to transform our world is to hold onto the Self, our inner consciousness, which is the knower of reality and the compass of right action.

1...678...48Page 7 of 48