New information reveals the truth is a lot darker, but there are also paths to healing.

Have you noticed a proliferation of websites promoting ‘cures’ for long COVID-19 and vax injury? These talk in terms of compromised immune responses that need readjusting often through dietary formulas or supplements or even medicines that are sold via the sites. No doubt you have the same questions as us, do they work and if not what might?

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

To answer this question we need to review the historical fundamentals of what has gone wrong with public health and then understand what has happened recently. Only then can we start to identify the directions pointing to possible solutions to the unique medical challenges created by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

During the twentieth century improvements in nutrition, housing, hygiene, sanitation, work conditions, medicine, surgery and neonatal care boosted our health and longevity. In 1900 the global average life expectancy at birth was 32 years rising to 64 years in 2000, a relentlessly positive rise.

Yet it was also a century characterised by chemical proliferation. As the decades wore on, more and more largely unregulated chemicals entered our daily life via food additives, synthetic foods, chemical agriculture, the environment, the air we breath, housing, industrial processes, the oceans, the water we drink and medicines. A paper published in November 2021 entitled “Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity” reported: 

“Recent analysis of global inventories of chemicals estimates humans have synthesised over 350,000. New synthetic chemicals are constantly being developed: recently, the USA alone produced an average of 1500 new substances a year. Many of these substances are known to be toxic in small doses, sometimes in combination with other pollutants, or as breakdown products after release into the biosphere and geosphere.”

Many are forever chemicals which accumulate in the environment or in human and animal tissues posing a long term threat to health and life. As a result, even as longevity was increasing, our immunity and health were declining. We were becoming more vulnerable to disease. As the century drew to a conclusion, the growth in mental illness, cancers, heart disease, life threatening allergies, respiratory illness, disabilities and autoimmune conditions was eroding longevity. Fortunately this was almost balanced by further improvements in healthcare protocols and quality of life measures, that is until the current century dawned, when something truly novel and frightening began to take its toll—a longevity killer. But this was not just the result of unfortunate mistakes, nor was it due to lack of precautionary testing or foresight, there was planning involved.

An article in the UK Daily Telegraph entitled “Lab leak most likely source of Covid, says Prof Tim Spector” begins to spill the beans. Prof. Spector is not someone speaking from the sidelines nor is he in any way under qualified. He is a professor of genetic epidemiology at King’s College, London, a world leading centre for gene therapy research. He was awarded the OBE for his work advising Downing Street during the pandemic and for his role in creating the Zoe virus tracker. Prof. Spector told a Zoe podcast that it was:

“Obvious” there had been a cover-up about the origins of the pandemic…I don’t think there’s any doubt that this virus emanated in China, in a place near Wuhan……and that the most likely source of this was a lab leak from Wuhan.”

Prof. Spector said there were scientists experimenting with hazardous viruses at the Wuhan Virology Lab that got out of control rather than it being a plot, but he points to a trail of shredded documents and email exchanges between the US and China at the time, saying:

“There was a very obvious cover-up very early on by various governments saying we have to get a report out there saying this is all down to bats so people aren’t going to blame labs and scientists” He continued: the aim was to keep the credibility of biotechnology research going in the public’s mind.

Back in 2021 I was in touch with a leading researcher at King’s College. He held much the same precautionary opinion as Spector and told me this was generally held by his colleagues. He also indicated caution concerning COVID-19 vaccine safety, pointing out that the biotechnologies involved were risky and had unpredictable effects. However in 2021, my contact was too frightened to go on the public record with his conclusions. Prof. Spector’s broadcast indicates that the tide of concern at King’s College has risen enough to speak out.

Prof. Spector concluded by warning that the gain of function research to increase the potency of viral pathogens undertaken at Wuhan was dangerous. Ongoing research of a similar nature was still occurring at labs around the world.“It should be treated with the same seriousness as the threat of nuclear war. It could all happen again starting in another lab if we’re not careful,” he said.

The research at Wuhan was funded in part by the Chinese military. From the outset, serious money backing biotechnology research has been tied to the development of bioweapons. These programmes are highly secretive and kept out of public view, but there is no doubt that a cat and mouse game of pathogen and vaccine research is being played out privately in government funded labs around the globe. An article published in Health Security during 2022 entitled “Next-Generation Biowarfare: Small in Scale, Sensational in Nature?“, makes no bones about it, calling for:

“Closer collaboration between frontline civilian scientists and national security establishments to build rapidly scalable networks of expertise…which will enable tactical versatility and more precise [bioweapon] attacks.”

All this adds up to a very powerful reason for governments to hide the origins of COVID-19. In fact the dangers and risks of biotechnology research have been kept well hidden from the public for years. Gene editing is inherently mutative, but all of the public messaging emphasises imagined benefits from procedures which don’t yet fully work, nor are likely to in the future. As I am writing this report, evidence of the reluctance of the New Zealand government to admit any error surfaced remarkably enough in the New Zealand Herald (at last) under the headline “Covid-19 inquiry: Vaccine mandates ‘undeniably’ eroded trust, harmed some New Zealanders“. Our government was apparently reluctant to release the findings of a Royal Commission which is critical of the actions of the New Zealand parliament and the Health Service during the pandemic. 

On the morning of 28th November Commission Chairman Prof. Tony Blakely hinted at the contents of their report saying “Vaccine mandates caused huge pain to a “substantial minority” during the pandemic and Government should consider whether their benefits outweighed their harms”. Blakely urged the government to reverse its decision not to release the report until 2026 saying “there is no reason why the report could not be released today and its key recommendations acted on immediately.”

By the afternoon, the government gave in to the pressure and released the report. It is no wonder that our government wanted the report kept under wraps, they are currently introducing legislation to deregulate biotechnology which will expose our whole population to the hazardous outcomes of novel genetic experiments affecting our foods and medicines. As part of this process, the government has saturated the media with fanciful reports about the economic and health benefits of biotechnology that are unsubstantiated by science. They have also latched on to the PR fiction of ‘safe’ gene editing.

These glossy PR pieces of unscientific fluff do not disclose that key sectors of government-sponsored biotech research in many countries around the world are actually designing ways to kill people, as apparently happened by mistake (???) at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

The pandemic has made one thing absolutely crystal clear—inevitable biotechnology mistakes cannot be contained, they will spread without limit.

Millions of people have died during the pandemic. A paper published in Nature puts the number of excess deaths up till the end of 2022 around the world at 15 million. Two years later the figure is now close to 30 million. The colossal tally of excess deaths includes some among our friends and relatives, as well as public figures like sports stars, politicians and entertainers. So how has it been possible to hide from the public the deadly contribution of biotechnology experimentation?

No doubt governments and medical authorities have been able to censor the content of science journals, mainstream media and even social media platforms sticking closely to a PR narrative, but there are other factors. The rigid paradigm and methods of medical orthodoxy dictate the terms of discussion when it comes to illness and death. There is a limited list of possible causes of death and this list does not include biotechnology or gene editing. Diagnoses of cancer or heart disease etc. are labels that dictate paths of treatment and if fatal are intended to bring a sense of closure to the victim and the family.

The news that someone died suddenly following a cardiac arrest is nothing unusual and it closes the door to further scrutiny. But what if 30 million people die unexpectedly including young people before their time from a wide array of supposed causes, as has happened? You would think it is time to call in Sherlock Holmes, but unfortunately Sherlock has been confined under house arrest and gagged from speaking by the powers that be.

The twenty-first century is becoming the century of biotechnology experimentation in which we are unwitting guinea pigs, closely segregated from the reality of our dire situation.

Many of the proposed ‘cures’ for COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine injury are tied to orthodox medical diagnoses. They describe the injuries as caused by cardiac toxins or autoimmune illness for example, but is this the whole picture? Unfortunately not. The root cause of COVID-19 vaccine injury is mRNA vaccine interference with genetic, cellular structures and functions, including genomic effects caused by plasmid DNA contamination. This is capable of causing system-wide malfunction in the human physiology which research confirms has shown up during the pandemic in various guises in all eleven human organ systems. 

It is not at all the case that medical interventions designed to alleviate specific symptoms and conditions caused by vaccine injury can address the root cause—genetic disruption inside the cell membrane.

Examination of a consciousness-based approach to health

At the beginning of today’s article we promised to explore avenues of remediation. As the structure of DNA was being discovered, Queen Elizabeth was crowned and Everest conquered in 1953, something far more ancient was stirring and coming to the attention of the West that today should offer some hope—consciousness-based medicine. To understand its relevance and importance we will draw an analogy. Suppose you owned a Patek Philippe watch and for some reason it was damaged. Perhaps you dropped it in the bath or ran over it. The protective case is breached and the mechanism damaged. There are more than 200 tiny moving parts in such a watch and given its immense value, your only option is to send it back to the maker in Switzerland for repair.

Inside the cell membranes of each of our 37 trillion human cells there are over 100 trillion atomic components that are invisible to the human eye and working together at a dizzying speed to keep us healthy. In each cell our DNA suffers between 10,000 and 100,000 damage events each day which are repaired by elaborate self-interacting mechanisms intrinsic to the entire internal cellular structure and function. Without these repairs, the genetic transcription processes and routes which maintain our health in its widest possible sense would become abortive and leave behind DNA breaks that can drive genome rearrangements, instability, or cell death. In other words, our health depends on the exact coordinated arrangement of trillions of cellular components in trillions of cells.

Modern experimental gene technology such as that employed by mRNA vaccines invades the cell membrane and repurposes the hugely complex internal mechanism of the cell on which our health depends. The enterprise is foolhardy in the extreme and the accumulating evidence of excess death and illness during the pandemic confirms this. The complexity involved is staggering and little understood by modern biology. Any suggestion that further primitive invasive medical interventions breaching the cell might fix the problem are ludicrous. Once mRNA vaccine injured, the human body is like a very expensive watch that needs to be sent back to its maker for repair. But what if we don’t know who made it or the address of the place of design and manufacture?

As we have discussed frequently in our reports, our physiology is intimately paired with our consciousness. Physiology supports awareness, but what if consciousness creates physiology? If we are going to repair the damage caused by the biotechnology experimentation that characterised the COVID-19 pandemic, we are going to have to begin to understand consciousness, the missing piece of the equation of life. This is going to take us on a journey that may be very foreign to some or more familiar to others, but wherever we are starting from, we are going to have to go deeper. Investigation of consciousness has been the peculiar preserve of the ascetics and saints in cultures around the world, it now has to become the common coin of public health.

As an example we take a remarkable discovery made by Maharishi Mahesh Yogi in conjunction with Western scientists which pertains to the ancient Vedic literature and its deep relationship with human physiology. The discovery is published in a 640 page book which details an extraordinary correspondence between the structure and functions of the human physiology and the forty branches of the Vedic literature entitled “Human Physiology – Expression of Veda and the Vedic Literature. Modern Science and Ancient Vedic Science Discover the Fabrics of Immortality in the Human Physiology“. 

So what are the Veda and Vedic literature and where do they originate? Veda is a Sanskrit word that means ‘knowledge’ or more specifically ‘total or holistic knowledge’. It is closely identified with consciousness or Atma as it is termed in Sanskrit. Maharishi is adamant that Vedic literature has been widely mistranslated by westerners who often wrongly dismiss its expressions as the poetic or religious fancies of a primitive civilisation. He teaches that translation can never capture the significance of the Vedic literature, only mislead the reader. In fact it is not the supposed meaning, but the vibrational quality of the sequence of Vedic sounds and pauses between sounds that are important.

Western scholars have variously dated the extensive Vedic literature to between 1000 to 3500 years ago. Indian tradition and historians paint a very different picture. In this view, the Vedas originated as an oral tradition of recitation begun in great antiquity by highly adept ascetics. According to the Vedic literature itself, the Vedas are not man made, they are sequences of vibrations or sounds which correspond with fundamental laws of nature. They arise from a process known as Vedic cognition during which they zoom forth or appear in the awareness of enlightened sages or rishis. Thus the Vedic literature presents itself as timeless knowledge or science that was acquired through the subjective means of gaining knowledge—self exploration. They contain sequences of sounds true for all times, places and for all people carefully preserved by pandit families until the present day. If you wish you canlisten to short segments of the sounds from all forty branches of the Vedic literature along with a graphic indication of corresponding bodily systems affected. Sit in a quiet place and listen.

A very recent discovery has confirmed the antiquity of the Veda. The Harappan civilisation in the Indus Valley began around 9000 years ago. Archeological excavations 100 years ago uncovered a large and orderly city with sanitary water supply and drainage indicative of urban planning, all set out on a grid of roads facing the cardinal directions. Among the many finds were a small number of seals written in an unknown script that seemed to predate any other known writing, whose meaning has eluded understanding until now. A cryptographer working in the US has now deciphered the script and thereby rewritten history. He discovered that the Harappans invented a script to write down Vedic expressions that had hitherto been solely preserved through countless ages in an oral tradition.

The book Human Physiology Expression of Veda and Vedic Literature demonstrates that the extensive Vedic Literature presents the step by step sequential unfoldment of the structure and function of the entire physiology. Maharishi and scientists discovered that as it unfolds, sound by sound, word by word, chapter by chapter, book by book it comments on itself, explaining itself, it is self referral—an essential characteristic of consciousness and biological systems.

Within its many books, the Vedic literature contains its own key—instructions how to experience or know consciousness in its pure state. If this is properly understood, as was explained by Maharishi, it sets out a comprehensive system to reset the physiology in full health by handling the physiology from the side of the holistic nature of consciousness—the originator of physiology. Vedic sounds are prescribed to initiate this process.

In an legacy archive interview Maharishi explains this is not based on intellectual scholarship or translations, it is based purely on the experience of the holistic sequence of Vedic sounds. The Vedic techniques are designed to be easily acquired, disarmingly simple to practice for anyone once taught person to person by a traditionally trained teacher. We cover the proven results of some of the techniques in our book Your DNA Diet. They are intended to set up a cosmic harmony or resonance with the laws of nature governing the physiology thereby resetting it to the ground state or source of natural law which is experienced in an expanded state of consciousness.

If you are thinking this is too esoteric for me, think again. Hundreds of published studies document the benefits of yoga, meditation, herbal remedies, and Ayurveda which are included in the approaches of the Vedic literature. There are many similar approaches discovered by saintly souls and deep thinkers which are preserved by cultural traditions around the world still available today. You may already be following one of these. These may be foreign to the largely pharmaceutical perspective we have been taught to respect and accept without question, but they are not foreign to the Self (Atma) of all. Our consciousness is NOT a foreign concept, it is our most intimate SELF, It is who we are, the familiar partner of our entire bodily lifespan crying out to be explored and understood.

The pandemic outcomes have presented a stark choice to mankind. Do we continue to blindly trust a cabal of so-called experts who are pursuing reckless biotech experimentation and count bioweapon killers among their number or do we start to learn how to fully understand and use the capabilities of our self-referral consciousness to heal? Once started and with persistence, paths to enlightened consciousness can rapidly become a royal road to health.

We receive snippets of information from time to time and it now appears there are cracks developing in the solid wall of New Zealand COVID-19 vaccine defences. Some frontline medical staff are confronting the obvious.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

We have had first hand reports that some cardiac surgeons are quietly advising cardiac bypass patients to refuse boosters if they want to stay healthy. At a recent hospital meeting of Auckland cardiologists, a participant told the meeting that the time has come to admit the source of the current epidemic of heart disease. The spike protein generated by the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is a cardio toxin. As a result, cardiology waiting rooms and hospital cardiac wards are full, especially with young patients, and the problem is not going away. It is getting worse. 

The scale of the problem is off the charts, and it is crying out for a public discussion. So what is stopping this? The executive arm of our medical system is avoiding the obvious implications of key health data. The New Zealand Medical Council is still prosecuting doctors who cautioned patients about possible adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine in the early days of the pandemic. This has created an ongoing atmosphere of fear among practising doctors, they are reluctant to come forward with their doubts, for fear of losing their jobs and professional registration.

A follow up set of questions probing the OIA which revealed a ten fold increase of chest pain presentations to A&E among the under forties has so far met with a blank wall. One request was submitted on 2nd October, and under Official Information Act request (OIA) legislation, a reply should have been forthcoming by now. Instead Health New Zealand has written to say “Health New Zealand needs more time to make a decision on your request”. 

Unfortunately, the delay in the publication of health data is not limited to cardiac illness. Figures for cancer incidence have not been published since 2020—an unheard-of situation. Normally, cancer data is published annually. This is an important tool which helps in the early detection of any safety signals. An OIA request for information on cancer incidence covering the years 2020 to 2024 has been refused by Health New Zealand on the grounds that the information would compromise patient confidentiality. In fact, anonymised data collated by year cannot be traced back to any individual, pre-pandemic the publication of such data was routine.

Other countries, however, are releasing cancer figures, and they are damning. A recent conference presentation by James Royle a UK consultant oncology surgeon paints a very concerning picture. He reports and graphs a sudden change in the rate and patterns of cancer presentation dating back to 2021, which has continued to accelerate during the last two years. This involves the sudden onset of aggressive, often incurable stage 4 cancers exhibiting a novel biology, so called turbo cancers. The trend is particularly evident in bowel cancer stats. These are also affecting young people not previously considered at risk.

You can see clips of Royle’s presentation at an Irish medical conference interspersed in this summary by Dr. John Campbell. Royle asserts there is a causal association between the COVID-19 vaccine rollout and cancer incidence that is supported by both temporal association and his reference list of 13 biomolecular cancer mechanisms known to be triggered by mRNA vaccines. Royle systematically discounts the effect of other causal factors being promoted by poorly informed media such as poor diet, lockdowns, and genetics. They don’t fit the novel cancer data pattern and presentation types being seen by oncologists.

Unusually, a single cause (mRNA vaccination) has been identified for two normally unrelated conditions—heart disease and cancer. Why is this? The answer lies in the novel vaccine technology being employed. Uniquely, mRNA vaccines cross the cell membrane and interfere with genetic mechanisms designed to protect our health. Up until now, we have in many ways taken our health for granted. Unaware that trillions of immune actions are automatically initiated by our cellular-based genetics every single minute of the day and night to keep our body in balance and preserve our health. mRNA vaccines lock billions of cells out of this process and repurpose their genetic and immune functions to produce foreign toxic spike proteins. This is enough to trigger multiple immune failures, some of which can have fatal consequences.

At the outset of the pandemic, our health professionals were, for the most part, unaware of the published evidence documenting the dangers of mRNA vaccines. They were bombarded with ‘safe and effective’ PR messages. They were mandated to participate both personally and in their practice. They were threatened with serious consequences if they asked questions and warned against doing their own research. They received generous financial compensation if they towed the government line.

It appears that the executive level of Health New Zealand management is still rigorously enforcing these procedures, even as frontline medical professionals are becoming aware of the obvious—mRNA vaccines don’t work and they are seriously degrading public health. Until some brave doctors decide to speak up, we will remain stuck in an information blackout.

After five long COVID-19 years, it is at last time to take a win

The result of the US election has momentous implications for the COVID-19 safety debate here in New Zealand and around the world. President Trump has appointed Robert F Kennedy Jnr. (RFK) leader of a program to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA). In his victory speech last night, Trump promised to give RFK “wide latitude” to fix America’s health problems. In an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal in September RFK outlined the beginnings of a program to tackle the chronic disease epidemic affecting the US, especially the youth, by among other things: 

• Unshackling the health system from the unethical and overtly commercially predatory straight jacket of the pharmaceutical industry.
• Closing the revolving doors and conflicts of interest which enable drug manufacturers to unfairly influence the regulatory process.
• Reforming the regulations on medical drug advertising which has prejudiced the media in the United States and New Zealand against open debate of drug safety.
• Reforming regulations governing pesticide and chemical use.
• Educating people about the dangers of a highly processed diet and removing the crop subsidies which make highly processed foods so cheap.
• Funding research on preventive, alternative and holistic approaches to health and requiring doctor training to include such information.

RFK also plans to cease fluoridation of water. The key to understanding Kennedy’s approach is his grasp of independent evidence-based medicine. The relief and hope that this brings to COVID-19 campaigners is exemplified in this election night post from Robert Malone. How far will Kennedy go in righting the wrongs of the COVID-19 era and the vaccine mandates? We are not sure. Some, like Steve Kirsch, are already laying out their stall for comprehensive Covid vaccine reform. We join Steve in wishing for a very broad brush.

The main challenge we face in our distant corner of the world is a public health information gap

New Zealand has been following the lead of the US government on COVID-19 policy, even pushing ahead of it in some cases. Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines come from America and were approved by the US CDC. Pfizer’s contractual immunity from prosecution stems directly from US vaccine immunity laws. For the record, the Harris campaign and the Democrat Party required that all their staffers and volunteers be up to date with COVID-19 shots and boosters. The Biden administration also made it a mandatory condition of public funding of hospitals that employees, including doctors, were fully COVID-19 vaccinated. Therefore, we appear to have dodged a bullet. 

We have to decouple from reliance on prior US vaccine policy and misinformation, ask some serious questions and have public discussions. Mistakes were made and these have to be corrected. Continuing efforts to stop any public discussion of the official health data here in New Zealand is adding up to criminal folly.

So, will the outcome of the US election affect our health discussions here in New Zealand? Yes, we believe so. The blocks to public discussion in America and on the world stage will be lessened if not removed. New Zealand is not so isolated that this will not trickle through our borders into the public narrative.

A study of 3.4 million health records in the Korean national health database entitled “The impact of COVID-19 status and vaccine type following the first dose on acute heart disease: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea” reveals that individuals receiving mRNA vaccines are at higher risk of heart disease. Notably, younger people have an even higher risk profile than older adults.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

The study analysed the health records of individuals for just 21 days following either their first COVID-19 vaccine dose and/or any COVID-19 infection. In both cases, there was an elevated risk of heart disease, including acute cardiac injury, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, cardiac arrest, and cardiac arrhythmia. This supports the findings of our recent reports: 

Firstly, “Staggering New Data From Health New Zealand and Others” reported official Health New Zealand data obtained via an Official Information Act request (OIA), documenting a massive increase in admissions to Accident and Emergency among individuals under 40, rising from 2,000 per year to over 20,000 per year.

Secondly, “Breaking: 188% Rise in Mortality Risk Among New Zealand Teens Following Covid-19 Vaccination” reported official Health New Zealand data released under OIA showing that teens and people in their twenties had a disproportionately elevated risk of death in the 90 days following a COVID-19 vaccination.

Taken together, these findings show an ongoing risk of serious illness following mRNA vaccination that especially affects younger age groups. Significantly, this risk continues for months and years subsequent to COVID-19 vaccination.

Please note these are official New Zealand government figures. In other words, the conclusions are indisputable. Scepticism and accusations of misinformation are untenable. The figures show that Health New Zealand has been vigorously pursuing a universal mRNA vaccination policy that is known to damage the health of young people over the short and longer term. These official figures show that the consequences of this policy are very serious indeed. 

An article from the Scottish Daily Mail covering an unrelated situation presents some salutary lessons. The article examines the case of Portland Oregon, where authorities decriminalised the use of hard drugs in November 2020. By 2022, the streets of downtown Portland were littered with discarded needles and comatose addicts. Serious crime rose. Portland reversed its policy when faced with the evidence. 

Glasgow, however, has decided to copy Portland’s mistake and decriminalise hard drugs. They are making policy not based on evidence but on a social theory known as the harm reduction movement. This theory says that drug addicts will gradually emerge from their addiction when they no longer face prosecution but are rather assisted and counselled, including the provision of clean needles and pure drugs. In the modern context, the theory isn’t working, but the liberal Scottish government believes it should and will. They are rejecting the evidence of their own eyes, in favour of their social beliefs..

They are planning to give drugs to people that they know will cause harm.

When you believe that you are pursuing a social good, sometimes it can result in harm. As the evidence of harms from mRNA vaccines has accumulated, the theory that mRNA vaccines are safe and effective is no longer tenable, but the authorities are stuck in a do or die mode. Having gone so far down one road, they appear unable to turn back or even contemplate that a mistake has been made. They are psychologically dependent on a theory that has been disproved.

It is never too late to learn. We now know that a mistake has been made, and the mRNA vaccine policies are misguided. Even at this late hour, everyone will only feel relief if the facts are squarely faced and the appropriate corrections made to policy that reflect the official data.

Dear Media Representatives

It has been 5 long years since the earliest COVID-19 cases were noticed in November 2019. Last Saturday, I gave a talk in Whangarei where I was able to look back, discuss the way ahead and answer questions.  I reached the conclusion that we need a review. We need to take a long hard look at the events and outcomes of the last five years and then have some serious conversations. 

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

The role of journalists is not just to entertain, but to tell us what is going on in society. They look for truths under the surface and behind the scenes and then share their insights. They are unafraid to ask questions, even if the answers are sometimes unpalatable.

Newspapers and media reports are full these days of personal tragedies, more people dying too early, including young people with cancer or diseases that used to be rarely seen. However, few deep questions are being asked. It is the unprecedented sudden increase in the rate of these events during the pandemic that needs investigation and analysis.

Journalists worth their salt would be asking why the cancer statistics have not been published since 2019? Why are our hospitals overcrowded as never before? Why exactly are we falling ill, what with, and what are the numbers? Why are we frequently off work sick? Why have disability rates soared? Why are young people being affected as never before (see here and here)? Why is there a mental health crisis? Why are mortality stats elevated?

As we have been reporting at the Hatchard Report and GLOBE for nearly four years now, the weight of published scientific evidence points to a unique health crisis that is man-made. With a better understanding of the risks of gene editing, early warnings and more caution this might have been prevented. There are simple lessons to be learned, lessons that need to be reported in the media and widely discussed in society.

COVID-19 itself is a virus which most now believe with good reason was designed in a lab and then escaped. It uses the spike proteins on its surface to attach itself to a human cell. It then fuses with the cell and manufactures copies of itself. As we remarked early in the pandemic, being the result of genetic engineering rather than of zoonotic origin, it was likely to be unstable and suffer a high rate of mutation. This has proved to be the case. Multiple variants of COVID-19 have proved highly adept at evading vaccines and hiding from the immune system for long periods of time in various parts of our physiology, causing the symptoms of Long Covid.

mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are designed to breach the human cell membrane and repurpose the cell to produce spike proteins in the hope that our immune system will then learn to recognise and control the COVID-19 virus which has spikes on its surface. In the event, these COVID-19 vaccines have not proved effective, it is now even apparent that multiple vaccine doses encourage rather than prevent Covid infection. Moreover the spike protein is now recognised as a cardio toxin and the mRNA vaccine a deterrent to our immune functions. 

Thus both the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines utilise mechanisms which are destructive of cell integrity. Cellular integrity is at the basis of health. Our life begins with a single cell which multiplies to become the 37 trillion cells of the fully grown person. Each of these cells contains the same genetic identity. Each person has a genetic identity which differs from all other people in some respects. The ultimate purpose of the immune system is to protect and preserve the unique genetic identity of an individual’s cells.

The whole cell, nucleus, cytoplasm and membrane, is the wheelhouse of the boat of life. That first cell and all subsequent cells contain our capacity for experience, intelligence, drive and emotions. It contains our individual history and the history of our family and race. It supports our consciousness, our capacity to be awake. Everything that we treasure in life relies upon the integrity of our cells. Biotechnology knows very, very little if anything about how these precious human attributes are supported by our genetics. Both the COVID-19 virus and the COVID-19 vaccines are designed to disrupt and repurpose cellular genetic functions and they do so on a vast scale, affecting billions of cells. As we have written previously, this threatens not just our health but who we are. It can leave life adrift without an anchor.

A crime without a name

None of these risks are strangers to science, they were well known to researchers in the field before the pandemic. What is strange is the determination of the biotechnology industry to plough ahead with risky genetic experiments whose results could not be contained, not just might but actually did escape and spread without limit and could not be recalled. The commercial arm of biotechnology ignored these dangers and exposed the whole of humanity to the extreme risks during the COVID-19 pandemic. And still risky experimentation continues.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

The risks were obvious to everyone working in the biotech field from the outset. So why did they go ahead? In 2014, Jennifer Doudna, the inventor of CRISPR gene editing had a dream. In it, a fellow researcher took her to meet Adolf Hitler who was sitting ready with pen and paper and asking “I want to understand the uses and implications of this amazing technology you have developed”. Doudna recalled, in an interview with her biographer Walter Isaacson (Amazon link) “I was jolted awake from the nightmare. As I lay in the dark, my heart racing, I couldn’t escape the awful premonition with which the dream had left me”. She began to have trouble sleeping at night, fearing she had created a toolbox for future Frankensteins who would pervert her work.

In January 2015 at a conference of biotechnology researchers in the Napa Valley and during subsequent meetings, her thinking changed. The excitement generated by hundreds of biotech researchers gathered together reinforcing each other swayed her opinion. She decided that gene editing could do some good. She and her colleagues rejected the idea that gene editing was unnatural. In her mind Doudna began to minimise the prospect of risks. In the end, the conference participants and the biotech industry as a whole resolved to fight any attempt to regulate or limit their work. This opened Pandora’s box, setting the stage for the COVID-19 pandemic which was just a few years away.

As many as ten million people have died during the last five years as a result of the pandemic, insurance data suggests four times this number have suffered some form of lasting health disability. At the Hatchard Report we have documented that the balance of evidence favours Covid vaccination (Amazon link) as the main culprit, but whether these injuries were from COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccines is to a large extent immaterial. All of the deaths resulted from biotechnology experimentation. 

I am reminded of Winston Churchill’s response when he received confirmation of the Nazi holocaust: “We are in the presence of a crime without a name”.

The crime is even more strange because it is not at all clear exactly who is to blame. It is not just one person leading the charge. There has been a collective failure of intelligence. Millions of people worldwide have been trained in colleges and universities, and even in schools, to edit genes using CRISPR technology. They have been told that this will lead to a bright future free of disease and encouraged to make a profession out of it. Entrepreneurs have invested heavily and governments generously funded the commercial endeavours that spring out of each new discovery in the hope of a health breakthrough, but little of use has emerged except literally heart break.

Many people who have become involved in the commercial biotech juggernaut, including those in the media and PR industry writing about it, are unaware of the risks. It is as if they were given inaccurate directions, took a wrong turn and suddenly found themselves in the wrong part of town at the wrong time. Vast sums of money have been spent on public relations and AI designed to promote a biotechnology future. Much of this is written by hidden persuaders who have little scientific knowledge themselves. In most cases they are simply doing their best to earn a living using the inaccurate and misleading information that has been fed to them.

Western countries have been persuaded that genetic editing is a scientific miracle that is going to make life better. 80% of people have been COVID-19 vaccinated and ‘educated’ to accept a ‘safe and effective’ narrative. As a result it is hard to change public opinion and the course of events that has been set in motion. However the weight of mainstream published scientific evidence has increasingly moved against the safety of COVID-19 vaccination. News outlets around the world are beginning to acknowledge COVID-19 vaccine adverse effects. Even the BBC, a bastion of pro-vaccine PR, has recently publicized vaccine harms, albeit a few years late as called out by GB News.

Here in New Zealand, we are probably the least informed among western nations about the origins of COVID-19 and the risks of COVID-19 vaccination. Unfortunately, the rejection of an informed and cautious approach is beginning to appear deliberate on the part of those who edit media content. Take this for example: on 21st October the Boston Globe published an article “People in their 30s and 40s are facing an unprecedented wave of memory problems“. The Globe is behind a paywall so it is unlikely that many Kiwis read it. Luckily, RNZ and the New Zealand Herald picked it up, but were we actually lucky? NO, we were not.

The Globe article reported that memory lapses are expected as we age, but examined evidence that many surprisingly young people are suddenly losing their grip. It found that for the 15 years prior to the pandemic the numbers affected had remained steady, but then increased rapidly by 33% (affecting one million more young people in America) following the start of the pandemic. This is a red flag: a sudden increase coinciding with the pandemic. The implication was not lost on the Globe which left its readers able to connect the dots. The NZ rehash of the Globe report didn’t mention the actual figures or the timing and merely fobbed off its readers with the suggestion we have too much information these days, advising us to watch a little less TV. We were being dumbed down, just when we should be shaken awake.

That is our message today: shake off the lethargy, stand up for journalism as it should be. Ask the hard questions. Demand the facts and figures, they are being hidden and need to be exposed to fresh air. One thing is sure, a lot of long held conventional opinions need to be revisited and investigated. Times have moved on irrevocably and we need to rediscover where we stand in the changed landscape. Journalists have a vital role to play in this process. We have to evolve out of the pandemic. We need to educate ourselves about the hidden and truly serious dangers of gene editing. Forewarned is forearmed.

There is Safe and Effective Roadshow visiting Queenstown, Dunedin, Nelson and Wellington organised near the beginning of November. I hope you take the opportunity to attend and report the debate. We have never needed this more keenly. The time is now.

Sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

How has Health New Zealand missed a massive death signal among young age groups in New Zealand following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination?

New OIA data shows a 188% rise in the 3 month mortality risk among the 12-19 age group following mRNA vaccination and an 83% rise in the 20-30 age group.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

An OIA HNZ00064867 released 22 October 2024 under freedom of information by Health New Zealand lists the number of people in 2021 and 2022 who died within 93 days (3 months) of receiving a Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, broken down by age.

During this 2021/22 period some 12 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered to the New Zealand population of 5 million. Official figures have already revealed that all cause mortality rose in 2021 in tandem with the COVID-19 vaccination program despite the absence of COVID-19 infection and flu which was mostly due to New Zealand border closures. In 2022 New Zealand all cause deaths were 38,574 (7.4 deaths/1000 population) and in 2019 they were 34,260 (6.9 deaths/1000 population). This is an increase of 7.8%. This figure is concerning and we have previously discussed the implications at length.

The newly released OIA data allows us to find out if the excess mortality rate of any age bracket has been disproportionately affected in the 3 months following COVID-19 vaccination during 2021 and 2022.

There are 552,000 teenagers in the 12-19 age bracket. 58% of this group were vaccinated during 2021/22

There are 687,000 people aged 20-30 in New Zealand. 78% of this group were vaccinated during 2021/22.

Very few of either age group received booster shots during the time period.

The OIA reported there were 67 deaths recorded within 93 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the 12-19 age bracket for 2021/22

There were 166 deaths recorded within 93 days of COVID-19 vaccination in the 20-30 age bracket for 2021/22.

1st and 2nd shots were recommended to be given at a 21 day interval.

Allowing for the vaccination coverage rate, over the two year period the 12-19 age group as a whole were within 93 days of a COVID-19 vaccination for just 9% of the time. Yet their 3 month deaths (67) accounted for 26% of the total number of deaths (254) in their age bracket over the two year period. An increased mortality risk of 188%

The 20-30 age group as a whole were within 93 days of a COVID-19 vaccination for 12% of the time over the 2 years. Yet their 3 month deaths (166) accounted for 22% of the total number of deaths (762) in their age bracket over the two year period. That is an increased mortality risk of 83%.

The other age brackets covered by the OIA (30s, 40s, 50s, 60s and 71+) had a 3 month mortality risk relatively close to the elevated all cause mortality risk for the period. None of these age groups had a disproportionately elevated mortality risk, merely the already mentioned excess death rate.

What the data means explained in the simplest possible terms:

The 12-19 and 20-30 age brackets had a disproportionate mortality risk in the 3 months following vaccination. This may have contributed to the deaths of as many as 40 teenagers and 70 people in their twenties. It greatly increases the likelihood that a number of unexplained or unexpected deaths noted among the younger age brackets occurring in 2021 and 2022 were caused by mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. By implication the health, including long term health, of thousands more may have been adversely affected. These figures are very alarming. How were they missed?

The last published Medsafe Safety Report up to November 2022 records that a total of 184 deaths had been reported to CARM as adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination. Medsafe itself admits that this figure is very likely to be grossly under-reported. At the time, Medsafe determined that 163 of the reported deaths were unlikely to be related to vaccination, 15 could not be assessed, while 6 cases were possibly linked to the vaccines. In other words, they publicly dismissed almost any association between COVID-19 vaccines and mortality.

Medsafe dismissed any association by claiming that only a very limited list of disease types could ever be the result of a vaccination. Thus people dying from heart attacks, strokes, sudden onset cancers, types of neurological illness, unexplained sudden death, accidents due to brain fog, acute kidney illness and suicide were all excluded as unrelated. We now know that all of these categories of illness could be related to adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Yesterday in our article “Mental Health, Genetics, and Covid Vaccine Adverse Effects” we reported published findings and scientific reasoning showing that the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines have a very broad spectrum which encompasses the above illness categories. Moreover there is also evidence showing an increased health and mortality risk from the COVID-19 vaccines continues long past three months. How have Health New Zealand missed the implications? Perhaps they haven’t.

In our article “Staggering New Data From Health New Zealand and Others” we reported an OIA documenting a massive rise in Accident and Emergency presentations for chest pain among the under forties. Currently standing at around 30,000 per year, up from 4,400 in 2020. Health New Zealand has not issued a public comment. Nor have the New Zealand media published the figures. 

Our concerns run deeper than negligence.

We have been aware for some time of persistent but unsubstantiated and undocumented rumours reaching us from a number of independent sources reportedly close to families who had young family members who died subsequent to COVID-19 vaccination and who are reported to have received 6 figure compensation sums from the government on the condition set by an NDA that they not talk about the matter publicly.

We are raising this matter publicly now because of the mortality and health data disclosed by the recent OIA data and published studies which add credence to the claim that the health of a significant number of younger age groups are likely to have been substantially affected subsequent to vaccination. Although we do not have a copy of any such NDA, if they do exist our legal advice suggests that the secrecy requirements contained in an NDA, depending on its terms, may be challenged in the courts and could be deemed illegal. We can put anyone who feels they may have been affected in touch with legal representation up to date with the issue. Certainly any attempt to silence people adversely affected by a public health initiative appears to run contrary to New Zealand law.

If these rumours are true, they indicate that sections of the government knew or suspected that there was a mortality risk. If they are not true, this in no way detracts from the seriousness of the elevated mortality risk for young age groups following COVID-19 vaccination documented above.

If such payments did take place, we suppose the intent of the government would have been to prevent widespread public vaccine hesitancy. Essentially that would have been a part of their openly avowed strategy to dismiss some expert warnings and any notion that the completely novel and largely untried genetic mRNA vaccine method might pose unique risks or that the risks outweighed any protective effect.

In any case, the figures we report today suggest that there should have been an entirely different response. If the mortality data had been critically examined at the time, as it should have been, it would have revealed a significant death signal for younger age groups. If Health New Zealand had set aside its prejudicial faith in the word ‘vaccine’ and assessed the data as it came to hand, there could have been a different outcome. Considering it was known very early on that younger people had an almost zero mortality risk from COVID-19 infection itself, this should have led to an early cessation of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine rollout. There should have been no pressure exerted on schools, school children, university students and parents to get young people vaccinated, quite the reverse.

Two years ago we published an article “How Can People In Power Lie So Comfortably” in which we commented on some unexpected deaths of children. The death of any child or young person reverberates through extended families and whanau. It drags the whole society down in shock, grief, confusion and regret. It blights the future. Now we know all this might have been avoided.

Instead, the mortality risk, if known or suspected in the inner circles of Health New Zealand, was never made public knowledge. The opposite in fact. To this day Health New Zealand publicity misleadingly claims that COVID-19 vaccination is generally safe and necessary.

We have published these figures in the public interest well aware that, as we have repeatedly asked, a comprehensive analysis of population wide comparative health outcomes of the New Zealand public subsequent to the COVID-19 vaccination rollout should be made or the full data set released for public scrutiny. This needs to include vaccination status by date and age along with health outcomes and mortality data by date and type.

The data used in our analysis comes exclusively from OIAs and Official Health New Zealand and Stats New Zealand websites. Health New Zealand vaccination data is usually published with the following disclaimer:

“Data are sourced from the Aotearoa Immunisation Register (AIR) and may be subject to any data quality issues still to be resolved in AIR, which includes, but is not limited to: Incorrect vaccination event dates, miscoding of vaccination given, miscoded indication code and miscoding of person to vaccination event. Note that these data quality issues are largely attributed to the fact that many fields within AIR are free text and are therefore prone to data entry errors.”

As a result, the exact margin of error of the New Zealand COVID-19 statistics is unknown, but the calculated mortality signals contained in the latest OIA are so large that they should be a matter of great public concern. Failing to raise the matter in any public forum constitutes a breach of public trust and the New Zealand Bill of Rights. This information should be distributed as widely as possible. The carefully crafted PR myth of COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy needs to be exploded. It doesn’t fit real life New Zealand Health data. Disregarding a risk to children is unconscionable.