This article investigates why COVID-19 vaccines have such a broad spectrum of adverse effects. It offers some deep insights and ways forward.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

An analysis published in the Journal of the European Society of Medicine entitled “Suspected Causes of the Specific Intolerance Profile of Spike-Based Covid-19 Vaccines (Review/Analysis)” investigates some specific reasons why COVID-19 vaccines cause such a broad spectrum of adverse effects. It concludes:

“The exceptionally wide range, frequency and severity of reported adverse reactions associated with spike-based Covid-19 vaccination exceeds the known level of conventional vaccination. This is a cause for serious concern.  From a pharmacological point of view, spikes are highly potent substances, and they are not innocuous antigens. Therefore, they do NOT appear to be suitable for preventive immunisation against comparatively harmless infections [such as Covid-19].”

It reported that COVID-19 infection rates in the general population were higher after vaccination programmes began in 2021 than before in 2020. Following vaccination, spike proteins are distributed very broadly in the physiology where they are associated with the development of organ dysfunction over an extended period of time. The author writes:

“An overwhelming body of evidence supports the consequences of the main mode of action of spike-based COVID-19 vaccines, namely the down-regulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) by spikes. This  enzyme….is not only responsible for cardiovascular homeostasis, but is also involved in pro-inflammatory, procoagulant, pro-fibrotic and immunological effects via its main vasoconstrictor effector, angiotensin II.” 

This is a step towards explaining the magnitude and diversity of the spectrum of adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines and the mechanisms, but only a step in that direction. There are many other researchers investigating the basis for broad scale effects of COVID-19 vaccines over extended periods of time following inoculation. 

Writing under the tag line Nepetalactone Newsletter, a paper on Substack reports evidence of a positive tumour biopsy one year after vaccination which can be linked back to BNT162b2 plasmid DNA replication. Disturbingly, the paper reports a previously recognised bio-molecular mechanism which can enable the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to be self-replicating and thereby subject to spreading in a population through genetic shedding.

Both these papers are highly technical in nature, but essentially point to dysfunction in immunoprotective mechanisms. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realise that immune mechanisms protect us from not just one disease or a specific group of diseases but all diseases.

An initiative in Australia has highlighted some of the dangers of plasmid DNA contamination of COVID-19 vaccines referred to in the Substack paper. Following a comprehensive presentation from experts which included Australian test results, it received support from the Local Council in Port Hedland. They sent a letter to every one of the 537 Australian Local Councils saying:

“We are gravely concerned about the potential health risks posed by synthetic DNA contamination, including the dangers of genomic integration, cancer, hereditary defects and immune system disruption.”

The council will also send letters to every health practitioner within the Port Hedland area strongly urging them to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 modified-RNA (mod-RNA) vaccines. For a full review of the Port Hedland discussions and support go here. This offers some hope that, with the publication of studies like those referenced above, the tide of public and government opinion may start to turn.

So just how broad are the potential effects of COVID-19 vaccines? 

A Substack report from Pierre Kory MD asks “Are Medical Errors On the Rise Due To Cognitive Impacts Of The mRNA Vaccine?“. This is a deep dive into a subject that we have often addressed at the Hatchard Report here and here. Kory reviews the published literature documenting cognitive decline subsequent to mRNA COVID-19 vaccination, as we have also in our earlier articles, and then goes on to report his own observation of increased incidence of medical misadventure which he attributes to brain fog caused by COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination. He cites increased incidence of disability claims, VAERS reports of cognitive disorder, insurance claims and traffic accidents as corroborating data. 

In our articles at GLOBE here and here, we have suggested that mRNA vaccines can degrade intelligence. We formulated a general proposition that: intelligence is proportional to measures of coherent functioning in physiology. In other words, consciousness is supported by a network of trillions of cells that can function coherently only as long as each cell contains identical genetic material. We have described this as a biofield phenomenon. Crucially, the defining characteristic of human consciousness is its self-referral capacity. No one in the field of biology understands how our cellular genetics supports the expression of this function in human consciousness, but the principles of physical science allied with the received knowledge of cultural traditions can offer some vital insights.

An analogy will help explain the relationship between consciousness, genetics and human physiology. Very Large Array telescopes consist of multiple radio frequency telescopes placed miles apart which are networked together. They act as a single massive telescope which can tune into or ‘see’ into the radiation spectrum of objects in the distant deep Cosmos. Crucially each member telescope of the array must work in an identical fashion to all the other telescopes.

In this analogy our network of trillions of cells with identical genetic material is like an array. Individual cells are receivers of consciousness. When networked together they can tune into universal consciousness. In human physiology, this intercellular network supports a single identity or personality.

Consciousness supported by the cellular network has two sides: active and non-active, expressed and silent, object referral and self referral. The functioning side of the consciousness network includes perceptions, decisions, reflections and actions, but all of these rely on their connection with the silent non-active phase of universal consciousness, just as physical laws which function in the universe rely on their connection with the silent non-active unified level of natural law, sometimes referred to as the ground state of natural law. This universal level of consciousness exists independent of physiology, but is able to be experienced and expressed in individual life through the physiology.

In the waking consciousness of daily life, the non-active phase of consciousness is overshadowed by constant activity, perception and thinking. The purpose of traditional deep meditation is to clarify this situation, settling the mind to the extent that a clear relationship with universal consciousness is established uncluttered by activity. This is accompanied by deep metabolic rest and coherent brain functioning. A state of transcendence develops as the WHOLE physiology settles to its ground state. Research supporting the HOLISTIC nature of the effect of deep meditation is discussed in our article “New Studies Further Confirm Adverse Effects of Covid Vaccines. Can These Be Reversed, if So How?“. Ultimately, with regular practice a clear connection with universal consciousness is maintained along with activity. These points are discussed and referenced in our paper Evolution, Genetics, Physics, and Consciousness available for download.

Many people believe that consciousness is located in specific areas of the brain. It is true that some specific expressed functions of consciousness are carried out by specific areas and structures contained in the neural network of the brain, but the ground state of consciousness is connected to the physiology as a WHOLE. A first person report by Bill Lumley reprinted by the Daily Mail recounts his experience of being fully conscious while on life support and having been diagnosed as brain dead. The functioning aspect of his brain was quiescent, but his silent witness value of consciousness was fully awake.

In this context it is clear that there are two distinct phases of operation in the human physiological network. Inter-cellular connections outside the cell membrane support the connective network functions through biomolecular, electric and chemical media for example. The receiver functions are contained inside the cell membrane where our DNA and its genetic expressions are housed. Any intervention which edits or alters activity inside the cell membrane, as both viral infections and mRNA vaccines do, can disrupt our capacity to tune into universal consciousness. If the disruption involves a sufficiently large number of cells as is the case with severe infections and COVID-19 vaccines, research shows that the clarity of consciousness along with its functions can be degraded even leading eventually to the onset of dementia.

So far, explanations of the broad spectrum of adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines have focused on the factors external to the cell membrane such as the effect of the spike protein. It may be that the more powerful explanation lies in the disruption of the internal genetic functioning of cells which disrupts our connection with universal law and universal consciousness.

Colleagues working in Holland developed a reference work on adverse effects of modern medical interventions which interact with molecular mechanisms outside the cell membrane. They documented 19,136 scientific review articles published in scientific journals between 2000 and 2005 on 44,532 subjects comprising more than 82,000 pages of research abstracts alone. When modern medicine adopted and even mandated mass mRNA vaccination during the pandemic they crossed a red line and began interfering with the command and control mechanisms of the WHOLE physiology. The broad spectrum hazards of genetic interventions dwarf those of prior medical interventions in both scope and seriousness. They are more long lasting and potentially fatal and they cannot be recalled using any known conventional medical approaches.

Collective effects of consciousness

The Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) radio telescope, comprises ten 25-meter dishes located from Hawaii in the west to the U.S. Virgin Islands in the east that constitutes the world’s largest dedicated, full-time astronomical instrument. Indian sage Maharishi Mahesh Yogi suggested in the seventies that the receiving and amplification of consciousness can be enhanced by large groups practising meditation together, a collective principle widely recognised in many historical cultural and religious traditions. The very wide base of published research supporting this phenomenon documenting reduced crime and conflict is discussed and fully referenced in my book Your DNA Diet. This opens the possibility of collective healing of the individual and society at large.

Healing the adverse effects of genetic interventions will require linking back to the source of life in universal law. Whether this is referred to as God’s Will or natural law doesn’t matter so much as the understanding that human life has a source, course and goal guided by the fundamental laws or eternal truths of the Cosmos. Reconnecting with these has always involved both our ancient relationship with the intelligence in plants and our relationship with universal consciousness—the self of all. If a new era of understanding and health is to dawn in human life, it must involve our source.

Last week we covered alarming official figures for chest pain among the under forties in New Zealand released under OIA. A ten fold increase which began before New Zealand had COVID-19 but after the mRNA vaccine rollout began.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share.

The story was picked up by the Australian media who pressed their state health authorities for data, and bingo the same alarming trend was uncovered in NSW and Queensland. Under pressure in a live interview with 2GB Sydney, NSW Health Minister Ryan Park said he had consulted at length with NSW Chief Health Officer Dr. Kerry Chant and as a result admitted to the interviewer “without a doubt some people presented to our ED’s with chest pain after the vaccination”. The Minister then tried to blame COVID-19 infection as the greater threat, but had to backtrack when the interviewer pointed out the chest pain trend in Australia also began before COVID-19 took hold as it did here in New Zealand.

Back here in New Zealand we have been subject to a week long public silence on the figures. From our correspondence bag, I know many of you have joined us in contacting MPs, health officials, and the media to ask for comment, but so far silence, again leaving the vaccine injured out in the cold. Watch this page for updates, they are coming.

Similar scenarios are being played out around the world. The UK Daily Mail leads with “Alarming rise of ‘super-fit’ slim young people suffering heart attacks“. It reports a 66% rise in heart attacks in the USA among people aged 18-44 since the pandemic began. It says:

“One in five heart attack patients are now younger than 40”

The article reports interviews with doctors who casually and conveniently blame the sudden acceleration in heart problems almost exclusively on COVID-19 infection, whilst mRNA COVID-19 vaccination cardiac side effects are wrongly dismissed as rare and non serious. The article states misleadingly:

“Once in the body, the Covid virus can cause the heart to become inflamed, a condition known as myocarditis, leading to damage that makes it harder to pump blood around the body. Over time, in extreme cases, this can damage the organ to the point it becomes too weak to adequately pump enough blood to the rest of your body, causing heart failure.”

After the reveal of the pre-COVID-19 but post-vaccine New Zealand chest pain figures and other recently published studies, the prevalent misconception being promoted by health authorities, governments and the media that COVID-19 infection is the ultimate cause of the cardiac problems and sudden deaths among the youth needs to be firmly corrected. A study of 820,000 UK adolescents entitled “Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in children and adolescents” which compared health outcomes for vaccinated with the unvaccinated found zero cases of myopericarditis among the unvaccinated group who suffered COVID-19 infection. In other words, cases of myopericarditis occurred exclusively among those who had received a Pfizer mRNA vaccine.

The tsunami of illness among working age people comes with a massive economic cost. An article in the UK Telegraph headlines “How Britain’s sickness crisis blew a £15bn hole in the economy”. What’s more, just like the chest pain crisis in New Zealand, the trend is accelerating into 2024.

The government is treating the trend as a plague of worklessness. A newly appointed government tsar, himself recovering from a recent heart attack, urges people to get back on their feet. It fails to ask what might be causing ill health. It shouldn’t be too difficult to interpret the timeline of the above graph. Yet government misdirection and denial are typical responses. Nor are governments unafraid to simply hide the alarming figures. Here in New Zealand, Stats NZ has responded to concern about rising excess deaths by stopping publication of weekly mortality figures, and that is just one example. 2019 is the last year figures for cancer incidence in NZ were published by the Cancer Control Agency. Access to cardiac hospitalisation and incidence data past 2020 is restricted by Health NZ.

The OIA chest pain statistics for the under 40s was a rare look behind a closed door. Other statistics pointing in exactly the same direction include the last available Medsafe Covid Safety Report #46 dated November 2022 which records a cumulative 13,000 reports of chest pain following COVID-19 vaccination, a number which Medsafe itself admits is grossly under reported.

Another corroborating statistic is the leaked Wellington Region data showing an 83% increase in cardiac hospital admissions. For obvious reasons, we can’t reveal our source for this.

You have to ask yourself why 11,000 Health NZ medical staff and contractors sought and received Covid vaccine exemptions and why ACC staff point blank refused to be subject to any vaccine mandate. They knew first hand what was happening.

There is no prior history of this fit under 40 age group reporting to EDs pre-pandemic in tens of thousands. Just think, pre-pandemic someone under forty dying suddenly in the USA with a supposed cardiac condition was so rare, that it was standard practice for the police to require a toxicology report to check that they hadn’t been poisoned. How times have changed.

You can imagine that in a climate of denial and restriction, it has been very hard for the New Zealand public to realise the extent of the problem and the risks they face. One of our subscribers forwarded our recent email on the myocarditis crisis, which referenced a just-released official Medsafe report, to a friend they believed might be open to listen. The reply came back “I’m afraid I won’t read anything from this guy – he’s a well-known spreader of misinformation”. I wonder what the friend would say if they realised they had just refused to hear about the conclusions of a damning government report? A report that our mainstream media has failed to cover. I wonder what they would say if they knew that unlike the government we reference published studies in all of our public missives.

Fortunately, there is some help on the way from public spirited journalism. The independent Centrist reports they supported the successful defamation battle of Chantelle Baker against the New Zealand Herald and the often quoted Kate Hannah of the Disinformation Project, which was set up and funded by the Prime Minister’s Department. Kate Hannah had labelled Baker part of the “NZ Disinformation Dozen” and called her a “useful idiot”. According to the Centrist, the settlement is tantamount to “an admission that Kate Hannah is not an expert whose opinion is above defamation laws”. We note the settlement also brings the Prime Minister’s Department into grave disrepute.

I expect the damning verdict will escape attention from mainstream media. This just goes to show how far the government has succeeded in conditioning the public to close their minds. As a result, our media is full of stories of family tragedies without connecting the dots. Those raising questions from within the medical profession have been silenced, stood down and in a number cases struck off, creating a climate of fear.

We wonder how much further the government plans to proceed along this path? It seems determined to hold its course, continuing to approve and promote novel biotech medicines and mRNA vaccines despite alarming published evidence building up in reputable journals documenting the harms. We have summarised and referenced these papers again and again. Letters and emails to government ministers, MPs and health authorities remain ignored and largely unanswered. The government is now determined to press ahead with biotechnology deregulation, extending lax public health oversight to include unlabelled novel GM foods.

There are three types of leaders. The first and best are those who surround themselves with wise and learned counsellors, who listen to both sides of an argument and then decide on a course of action having taken into account fact, tradition, culture, morality and the welfare of their followers. The second are those who have a clique of like-minded counsellors, who make a pretence of having considered the arguments and parade their piety. The third type is the worst. They decide on a course of action of their own choice that accords with their personal goals and ideology without regard to the needs of time or place, the facts on the ground, or the opinion of others. They pursue their policies whether it does harm or good. It is not possible to persuade, negotiate with or influence such leaders with common sense. Our only recourse is the ballet box and that too offers only poor and manipulated choices.

Especially during the pandemic, governments around the world have adopted the position that they are in charge of dictating technological conformity. This extends from our food choices to what type of car we are allowed to purchase. Technology rules our lives and dogs our heels. The AI in our television listens in on our living room conversations and maps out our next purchase and our next drug. It rewrites the past for us, distorts the present and lays out a uniform future of ill health, mediocrity and drudgery. The pharmaceutical industry, whose tentacles, courtesy of Prime Minister Luxon and Judith Collins, will now extend into our pantry cupboard and onto our dining room table, has played a leading role in promoting and exploiting this trend which fully accords with the third type of leadership.

We are now reaping the ill harvest of this madness. Enough is enough. Shout it from the rooftops. People young and old are being poisoned by novel biotechnology experimentation protected from any scrutiny or accountability. This has to stop without delay.

The extraordinary New Zealand data of chest pain and cardiac incidence among the under forties, which has increased tenfold and remains high right up to the present, has provoked many questions and comments to our email inbox. Ranging from ‘how could the authorities let this happen’ to the ridiculous ‘the OIA doesn’t exist’ and everything in between. Making sense of the scale of the disaster is hard, and facing up to the failure and duplicity of those charged with protecting our health is even more perplexing.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

The OIA data for chest pain and cardiac events is not an isolated statistic. Medsafe have just released the results of a follow up survey of 298 NZ patients who received a clinical diagnosis of mRNA vaccine induced myopericarditis at least 90 days prior to filling in the survey. This survey was conducted two years ago. Inexplicably, Medsafe have waited until now to release the results. Contrary to earlier advice given to people experiencing symptoms of myocarditis that the final outcome would be mild and self-limiting, the survey revealed persistent serious problems beyond 90 days which had not been resolved.

“The median age was 36.5 years. 62% were male…. Chest pain was the most frequently reported physical symptom, experienced by 287 (96.3%) participants, followed by fatigue (256; 85.9%), shortness of breath (251; 84.2%), palpitations (234; 78.5%), and dizziness (189; 63.4%).. Twenty-two (7.4%) participants reported fainting.”

Representative survey responses to a range of open-ended questions about work, family life, treatment, follow up, etc included the following:

“Tried to exercise again and pericarditis symptoms returned.”

“Chest pain is extreme… not being able to walk without a cane.”

“This experience has caused anxiety and depression.”

“Before I was diagnosed, I was a full-time worker and into [sporting activity], since I got it, I can’t work at all or do any exercise.”

“Not being able to take care of my children is just awful. I can’t even kick a ball with my sons anymore.”

“I was initially told a number of times in ED that I was having anxiety attacks. I felt like no one was listening to me which made it even harder.”

“Was anxious about having the booster and I was fobbed off. I am not an ‘anti-vaxxer’. Doctors need to listen and be more empathetic.”

“Disappointed with lack of after care. Absolutely no specialist follow-up. Very disappointing.”

“Utter frustration that I had to go privately to get any help. Was told it would take one year to get any cardiac test. I would still be waiting for a diagnosis. I had to go privately.”

“To hear… myopericarditis repeatedly being reported as a mild consequence of vaccination was a huge insult and should immediately stop. This is not a mild sequela for many. This is a profound life changing and devastating event.”

“ACC – although accepting my vaccine injury treatment injury claim – decided seven days was sufficient time to recover [from it]… it took… nearly 8 months after the claim, for full cover to be approved.”

The Key Learnings section of the report admits there were deficiencies in:

• The vaccine information given to the public.
• Reporting systems for adverse reactions.
• Knowledge about possible adverse reactions.
• Keeping up to date with the implications of clinical publishing

The net effect was to create a deficient clinical and informational response to the tens of thousands of individuals reporting to GPs and emergency departments with chest pain. As a result, myopericarditis has been greatly under diagnosed or a diagnosis and clinical response has been delayed, even in some cases for years.

This is still continuing. The New Zealand Herald leads this morning with an article “Auckland man waited in Middlemore Hospital A&E in seven-hour ordeal”. A 39 year old man reported with chest pains. He was triaged and x-rayed within 35 minutes, but then waited 7 hours to see a doctor. During this time, he sat and sometimes had to stand along with hundreds of patients in the waiting room. He witnessed people sleeping on the floor, others walking out with medical tubes attached to their arm and a bleeding pregnant woman who sat on a hard chair for five hours before being seen.

The article doesn’t inform the public that the man was just one out of well over 30,000 individuals who will report to Accident and Emergency with chest pains this year, compared to just 2,000 pre-pandemic. It doesn’t tell us whether this was his first visit. It doesn’t tell us what the outcome was, whether he was referred to a cardiologist with a wait time of over a year. In other words, it leaves the public poorly informed. Despite the official data that has just come to light, it fails to correct the misleading information about vaccine-induced myopericarditis and chest pain incidence that the paper has been dutifully relaying to the public at the behest of the government and the health service for the last few years.

It doesn’t tell the public that if the man eventually secures an appointment to see a cardiologist, he will probably be asked if he is COVID-19 vaccinated and then confidentially and quietly advised to never have another shot. In contrast, while he is waiting for the appointment, he might receive numerous messages from the free-spending PR department of Health New Zealand via TV or text advising him to get another mRNA COVID-19 booster.

All because, as the Medsafe report concludes, Health New Zealand and the government are suffering from a clinical information deficit that they have failed to correct, along with an irrational faith in a so-called vaccine that doesn’t prevent disease, but rather causes it.

I don’t want to sound too harsh, but now we are aware of the astounding figures Health New Zealand has been sitting on and hiding from the public for the last few years, we have to ask serious questions about the probity of the management. They are supposed to protect and promote public health. Health New Zealand has become a medical system out of sync with reality along with a staff stretched beyond elastic limits. In other words, its left hand doesn’t know what its injured right hand is doing.

In the comments section of the Medsafe report, there were people who said they felt isolated and too socially embarrassed to even speak to their GP in case they were labelled as an anti-vaxxer and became a complete social pariah. It is easy to forget how much effort and money the government pouted into labelling the unvaccinated. They became antisocial, extremist and anti-science. They were accused of seeking to undermine democracy and overthrow the government. The government funded documentary Web of Chaos aired twice on prime time TV and remains On Demand. It complained about so-called disinformation over images of nuclear bombs exploding and Hitler making speeches.

We now know that current Health Minister Shane Reti’s plans to fix Health New Zealand by targeting reduced wait times and Science and Technology Minister Judith Collins plans to deregulate biotechnology experimentation and do away with GM food labelling, are straight out of Alice in Wonderland. Those asking questions about mRNA vaccine safety, mandates and died suddenly were right all along. The longer a public mea culpa and a stop to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination rollout is delayed, the further Health New Zealand, the media and the government are falling down their own rabbit hole which poses a very serious danger to public health and stability.

Vaccine injury and the serious long term adverse health prospects

Today, we report two new sources of alarming information about COVID-19 vaccine injury. One from Health New Zealand data and the other from the New Zealand health insurance industry. We ask how the government could have either missed these or deliberately ignored them. We then go on to discuss network theory and physiology. We will show how mRNA vaccines are able to have extensive and long lasting effects.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share.

Health New Zealand Emergency Department data

An OIA (freedom of information) request to Health New Zealand asked for “The number of people under the age of 40 presenting to Emergency Departments (A&E) throughout New Zealand hospitals with Chest Pain or Heart Issues by year?” The Health New Zealand answer (OIA reference: HNZ00061156) contains shattering information:

Year | Number presenting to Emergency Departments with chest pain

2019  2219

2020  4406

2021 13063

2022 21416

2023 20005

2024 (to June) 14639

The definition of chest pain for the purposes of this data includes right sided chest pain, chest wall pain, chest pain, musculoskeletal chest pain, chest pain on breathing, acute chest pain, chest pain on exertion, assessment of chest pain, anterior chest wall pain, atypical chest pain, history of chest pain, costal margin chest pain, non-cardiac chest pain, cardiac chest pain, dull chest pain, left sided chest pain, central chest pain, and ischaemic chest pain.

For the benefit of our overseas readers, these figures need to be read in the context of COVID-19 incidence in New Zealand. Because of border closures, quarantine, and lockdowns, New Zealand had close to zero Covid cases until February 2022. In contrast, Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccination became available in February 2021 for older people and those at risk. General availability for those under 40 years started towards mid 2021. Legislation making COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compulsory for those in various state employment sectors (vaccine mandates) was enacted in November 2021. The mandates were also adopted by the vast majority of private employers.

With this timeline in mind, the close association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and chest pain and/or heart disease among younger people becomes very clear. The surge in Emergency Department chest pain admissions began well before the COVID-19 infection took hold in New Zealand but immediately after the COVID-19 mRNA vaccination programme began. The incidence of chest pain and heart disease took off in 2021 as more of the age group were vaccinated. Nor do the figures suggest a strong independent effect of lockdowns on chest pain and cardiac health.

Whilst the OIA figures are only by year and for the under 40s, 2021 official weekly figures for vaccination and mortality for all age groups combined, that we reported at the time, show a very close association. All cause death rates rose in tandem with mRNA vaccination.

The OIA figures suggest approximately a ten fold increase in chest pain and/or cardiac events among those under 40 probably associated with the administration of mRNA vaccines. Moreover the figures to June 2024 indicate the trend is still continuing.

These alarming figures are not marginal. They stand up and slap you in the face. They have been in the possession of Health New Zealand from the outset, but the public has heard nothing about them from official sources. Health New Zealand is still offering mRNA vaccines and telling the public the jabs are safe and effective. The serious implications are obvious. As we have been asking repeatedly, the government must first pause mRNA vaccinations and then publish the health outcomes of the last few years by date, age, vaccination status, and disease category. Only then can the longer term effect of the mRNA vaccines be known in detail. Instead, the government is not just hiding the figures and continuing to promote the mRNA vaccines, but also prosecuting a whistle blower who leaked mortality data.

• How many parents have taken their children in for COVID-19 mRNA vaccination relying on the safe and effective narrative of Health New Zealand and the government when all along Health New Zealand was sitting on these truly alarming figures?
• How many young adults have casually accepted COVID-19 vaccination, unaware that those offering them knew they could be very dangerous?
• How many working age Kiwis were coerced after November 2021 into taking the jab on pain of losing their job, profession and home?
• How many New Zealanders are still suffering the devastating adverse effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine injury years later?

All this happened when Health New Zealand should have realised, or possibly did know very well, what was going on from their own data and from overseas sources early in 2021. When finally on 15 December 2021 Health New Zealand wrote privately to District Health Boards admitting that mRNA vaccines could cause myocarditis, they said the incidence was as few as 3 cases in 100,000 vaccinations. Their own data, as reported above, told a completely different story.

If these were all single individuals, the OIA figures would show that in the under 40 age group in New Zealand in 2021 1 out of every 130 individuals reported to an Emergency Department with chest pain or cardiac events. In fact, individuals with more serious cases would have been presenting multiple times, therefore this ratio will be higher, but not by orders of magnitude.

The majority were apparently sent home with ibuprofen and told to stop worrying (???). They were not made aware that overseas studies indicated their symptoms could be the start of long term illness and vulnerability to cardiac issues, as we reported in our March 2022 article “Study Finds Persistent Heart Abnormalities Among Child Vaccine Recipients”.

In 2022, chest pain incidence increased by a further 64% among the under 40s to a total of over 20,000 cases and continued at that level in 2023. These are not all the same people week after week and year after year, suggesting the long term rate of incidence of chest pain requiring a visit to an Emergency Department is staggeringly high.

The 15th December 2021 letter was signed by Ashley Bloomfield, New Zealand Director General of Health now honoured as Sir Ashley Bloomfield and currently directing the global pandemic response plan at WHO (World Health Organisation). The letter was also signed by Dr Andrew Connolly, Chief Medical Officer, Dr Juliet Rumball-Smith, GM Clinical Quality & Safety COVID-19 Vaccine & Immunisation Programme, and by Astrid Koornneef, Director, National Immunisation Programme. From the above OIA, it is clear that these people carry the heavy responsibility of failing to investigate the extent of vaccine injury, misinforming the public, GPs, and the DHBs, and endangering public health.

In addition to this, there has been a persistent public narrative that the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccination are limited and generally mild. This is a false narrative. It is counterfactual to the known pre-pandemic ten year 25% mortality risk of acute myocarditis. In fact, mRNA COVID-19 vaccination poses significant cardiac mortality risks. A study conducted in Spain and just published by the prestigious journal Vaccine entitled “Association of SARS-CoV-2 immunoserology and vaccination status with myocardial infarction severity and outcome” concluded:

“The combination of Covid vaccination and natural SARS-CoV2 infection was associated with the development of severe heart failure and cardiogenic shock in patients with myocardial Infarction, possibly related to an increased serological response.”

The researchers examined outcomes from 950 heart attack patients from March 2020 through March 2023 in a Madrid hospital. They found COVID-19 vaccinated and previously COVID-19 infected patients had an over 50 percent higher risk of death or heart failure than unvaccinated people who had also been previously infected – and a 90 percent higher risk than those who were unvaccinated and previously uninfected.

These researchers in Spain simply did what we have been asking our government to do for four years. Monitor the health outcomes of patients, compare the data for the vaccinated with the unvaccinated and analyse the results. Given our alarming increase in Emergency Department stats, why would our government omit to do this?

The Spanish study goes a long way to explaining why there is the persistently high rate of Emergency Department admissions with chest pain and heart failure up to the present day as the OIA data shows. In other words, cardiac adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination are not necessarily mild and often do not go away over time. In fact, the adverse cardiac effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination can be exacerbated by a subsequent COVID-19 infection. Moreover, as we have been reporting, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination also raises igG4 antibody levels which leaves the COVID-19 vaccinated more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, a process known as immune imprinting. In other words, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination triggers a form of cardiac double jeopardy.

Alarm bells sounding among private health insurers

Our second source of information has been passed on to the Hatchard Report from within the New Zealand Private Health Insurance industry. Around 36% of the New Zealand population are covered by some form of private health insurance. Among these there are about 920,000 working adults (up to 65 years). According to our source, the incidence of heart disease and cancer has accelerated to record highs in the years since 2020. However the most concerning trend for our health insurance industry involves another condition.

Some health insurance policies include income protection coverage for working adults should they become sick and unable to work. In the event of an illness, the insured’s income will be covered if they are absent from work as a result. For the majority of illnesses this coverage does not extend indefinitely because treatment for most conditions can get people feeling well enough to return to work. However there has been a recent significant and concerning blow out in the number of working adults suffering from cognitive decline—a condition sufficient to cause long term incapacity to work. Individual cases can cause insurers to continue to make income support payments over many years, costing millions of dollars per person.

To put it bluntly, this information may indicate there has been a significant increase in the incidence of early onset dementia among working age adults.

A year ago we published an article “The Long Read: Mental Health Issues are Multiplying. Why?“. We now have to ask if the alarming rises in anxiety, confusion and depression that we reported at the time have in some cases been developing into long term cognitive decline? The Health Insurance Industry is generally very secretive, the fact that they are now very concerned and seeking solutions says a lot about how serious this might be.

Networks and COVID-19 vaccine injury

The general public in New Zealand is so poorly informed on these issues, that people are still unable to connect the dots joining the well publicised crisis in our health system and COVID-19 vaccination. A lot of people accessing mainstream media sources are wondering why there are still people who have refused multiple COVID-19 vaccinations. To them it might seem incredible for anyone to suggest that a simple vaccination can cause widespread harm. In fact traditional vaccination has always been associated with adverse effects, some of them very serious. Moreover, reductions in the rate of serious infectious diseases like smallpox preceded vaccination programmes and was largely achieved via public hygiene measures. However, whatever you might think about that, mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are not traditional vaccines in any sense.

How could a vaccination cause cancer, heart disease and dementia, that’s ridiculous right? Apparently, though, mRNA vaccines are at high rates. How? To answer this question in simple terms we refer to network theories of immunity. Networks are connected by a communication system and are usually designed to achieve a shared purpose. Every person has around 37 trillion cells that each contain identical DNA (with the exception of red blood cells which have no DNA to expedite unimpeded circulation). Our cells are networked through multiple means of communication, chemical, electrical, vibrational etc., yet we have a single personal and genetic identity and our cells share a single immune purpose to maintain health. Cells cooperate with one another to achieve this purpose. They do so through multiple trillions of communications and actions everyday which repair the integrity and uniformity of our DNA and repel foreign pathogens and toxins.

Cooperation is crucial to the functioning of networks. Individual units in a network must continue to work towards a shared purpose, otherwise a network could collapse. This is why botnets and viral software are so dangerous to computer networks. They repurpose the protocols of network members which can eventually spread and collapse the network viability. We have seen many cases of computer viruses over the last few years affecting the networks of various organisations and corporations.

mRNA vaccines cross the cell membrane (traditional vaccines do not) and repurpose their genetic functions. Thereby they affect the command and control functions of our physiology. In the case of COVID-19 vaccines, billions of cells are repurposed to produce the spike proteins found on the surface of the COVID-19 virus. The purpose of the mRNA vaccine is to encourage the immune system to develop a response against COVID-19 spike proteins and therefore COVID-19 infection. Almost everyone now realises these mRNA vaccines are very ineffective at protecting from repeated COVID-19 infections, but the accompanying risks are not generally well known. In simple terms:

• The spike protein produced in massive quantities following COVID-19 vaccination, sometimes for months, is now recognised as a cardio toxin.
• The billions of cells repurposed by mRNA vaccines are no longer able to properly perform their immune functions and their role in the immune network which includes fighting cancer and protecting from pathogens. Thus opening a door for a wide range of illnesses.
• Our higher mental functions rely on unique, exact and specific characteristics of genetic functions which are disrupted by COVID-19 vaccines. Thereby the potential for mental illness is increased.

In sum, our cell-based immune network no longer has a single purpose. Our internal physiological communication systems distribute the resulting imbalanced functions and proliferate health problems. It is as if our whole physiological network of genes, cells and organs has been invaded by a rogue agent. The network is fighting itself, as happens with autoimmune diseases. If the number and density of mRNA vaccine repurposed cells is sufficiently large our immune system can fail to clear up the mess. In this case, a wide variety of disease outcomes can result.

This has to stop now

This has not been a merely theoretical article. The Health New Zealand data and the other results and studies we have been reporting speak for themselves. The fact that Health New Zealand has not acknowledged the import of their own statistics is a huge failure of intelligence. It is all but unforgivable. Despite early warning signals, Health New Zealand has failed to take account of facts well known to biotechnology researchers and reported in the literature long before the pandemic began. Gene therapies, of which COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is a type, can have multiple physiological adverse effects including whole system instability and collapse.

Health New Zealand have hidden behind an unjustified fiction that COVID-19 vaccination can only be blamed for a very limited, often mild and treatable known set of adverse reactions. In other words, they have excluded reported serious health outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination from any causal investigation. They turned their heads and looked away. In fact the data we have reported above illustrates just how far they have misled the public. In reality, the public have become unknowing participants in a deadly game of Russian roulette.

It is so far past time to recognise past mRNA COVID-19 vaccine harm and the growing dangers ahead. Especially as multiple mRNA vaccines are under development and soon to be offered to the public. Our government is planning to deregulate biotechnology, rushing like a moth to the flame. This has to stop now.

The UK Telegraph reports “Special education spending surges 70pc amid autism wave”. UK Department of Education figures show that the cost of supporting schoolchildren with special needs has jumped by more than two-thirds since lockdown from £6.9bn in 2018/19 to £12bn today. One in 100 UK primary schoolchildren are now entitled to formal council support as a result of autism, double the one in 200 before the pandemic.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and share and as an audio version.

Crucially, experts say that the autism figures are likely to understate the true scale of the issue as waiting times for a diagnosis have continued to grow. Which means the figures are not likely to be an artefact of changed reporting procedures or public awareness of the problem as is suspected to be the case for adult ADHD for example. It appears due to a steep rise in symptomatic autistic behaviour.

The UK is not alone in facing these problems. A report released by our Education Review Office (ERO) in March found that New Zealand school students are among the worst-behaved kids in the OECD. Notably behaviour has worsened during 2022 and 2023. As a result, Kiwi teachers are struggling to manage disruptive behaviour.

Our article “The Long Read: Is This the End of the Materialist Paradigm?” published in July referenced an analysis from the New York Times entitled “The Youngest Pandemic Children Are Now in School, and Struggling”.

The post 2019 mental health impairment is not just limited to children. In September 2023 we published “The Long Read: Mental Health Issues are Multiplying. Why?”. This reported multiple statistics documenting recent deterioration in mental health profiles.

The scale and scope of the post pandemic individual mental health problems and classroom disruption are unprecedented. There has been a tendency to ascribe these to the effects of lockdowns on home and work environments. We believe this is a speculative stretch and possibly the result of a blinkered or biased outlook which lacks the backing of sufficiently convincing scientific data and analysis.

The rapid rise in autism rates since 2019 is indicative of deeper causal factors. Scientists have found rare gene changes, or mutations, as well as small common genetic variations in people with autism, implying a genetic component. A growing area of research focuses on interaction of genetic and environmental factors. For example, a mother’s exposure to harmful contaminants during pregnancy may trigger a genetic mutation leading to autism in her child.

The suggestion that vaccines may cause autism became a scientific battleground for two decades from the early 90’s. To date any association has been dismissed by mainstream science as flawed and a myth. Significant questions remain, but despite these, the door is closed. Pursuing further research in this field has become a career ending option.

Now it seems the controversy needs to be revisited. mRNA vaccines are not traditional vaccines in any sense of the term. They are actually intended to edit intracellular genetic functions. A study published in 2022 found “Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line”. In other words, mRNA vaccines are both long acting and have the potential to cause genetic mutation—a strongly suspected causal factor for autism.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex developmental condition involving persistent challenges with social communication, restricted interests and repetitive behaviour. While autism is considered a lifelong disorder, the degree of impairment in functioning because of these challenges varies between individuals with autism. In essence, autism involves an unbalanced outlook, a lack of ability to engage appropriately with the social and behavioural environment.

In our article “The New Genetics — Huge Deficiencies in Our Understanding Need Correcting” we asserted “The greatest absurdity in the science of genetics is the exclusion of consciousness from its study, along with the false assumption that you can edit DNA and its expressions without altering consciousness or identity.” We reported that human life starts with a single cell which multiplies eventually into around 37 trillion cells, but only one single unique identity. The integrity of our identity relies on the preservation of genetic uniformity among cells.

In May we published our thought provoking article “Can Biotechnology Control Human Behaviour?“. Research on transplant recipients demonstrates how memory and behaviour can be distorted by the presence of foreign DNA in the body. We concluded:

“It is just a short step now to realise that gene editing, including any sort of editing of the chain of genetic functions within cells, could more or less automatically change our behaviour and psychological profile. More importantly, since our knowledge of cellular genetics now appears to be very incomplete, cellular genetic editing, if carried out on a scale commensurate with organ size, can scramble our behaviour, thinking, and understanding.”

At GLOBE we have been gradually building up a framework for the life sciences that includes consciousness. We recognise that mRNA vaccination in some cases may have impaired the holistic outlook and empathy usual to human thought, precisely because it disrupts the holistic genetic functioning that is uniformly shared by our trillions of cells. In our article “The Long Read: What is a Human Biofield?”, we have expanded on this understanding and suggest that genetic effects are networked and can be shared among groups of people. We suggest that higher human functions rely on very specific genetic and cellular characteristics that could be disrupted by mRNA vaccination.

The autism surge evident in newly released UK government data is a canary in the coal mine moment. Although changes in genetic structure and function following mRNA vaccination are not germline effects shared by all cells, they can affect billions of cells and do so to a lesser or greater extent in different individual recipients. Therefore there is a potential partial fit between the effects of mRNA vaccines on genetic and immune functions and the known association between genetic mutation events and autism incidence.

Among others, autistic traits include:

• Finding it easier to talk ‘at’ people, rather than engaging in a conversation.
• Persisting with behaviour that is unreasonable in the wider social context.
• Becoming fixated on ideas or behaviours including repetitive rituals.
• Being blunt in your assessment of people and things.
• Becoming upset if something unusual happens or if people express ideas or require behaviours that clash with your own preferences.

This is not an exhaustive list. In fact a great many other traits are associated with autism. Moreover the intensity of symptoms varies across a spectrum. Very often autistic people are misunderstood and their abilities underestimated. They can excel in their chosen specialised career. Far from being emotionally deficient, a significant body of research shows that autistic people often have intact emotional (affective) empathy alongside reduced cognitive empathy.

However all of the above list of characteristics have become more evident in individual and social interactions during the pandemic, including a polarisation of views that sometimes cuts across prior social, cultural, political and familial boundaries. This is sometimes associated with a refusal to accept that others may have their own good reasons to adopt views distinctly different from one’s own.

We suggest there is a case to propose and investigate a novel post mRNA Covid vaccination autistic syndrome which shares many characteristics with classical autism symptoms, but which also might have distinct differences.

To what extent any symptoms might or might not be a result of Covid vaccination can only be decided through research. Research comparing the short and long term health outcomes of the vaccinated with the unvaccinated across a wide spectrum of physical and mental conditions is required. Unfortunately most governments have closed access to the sort of health data that will allow such assessments to take place. We can only ask why? This sort of persistent and unreasonable denial could in fact be characterised as an autism trait. Can a government become autistic? You tell me.