Home Blog Page 13

Effective Responses to Pandemics and Peace Are Not Far Removed From Each Other

0

My experience as an educator has taught me that change begins within. It is our inner experience that enables us to gain perspective, to re-evaluate and change gear. This is the need of our time.

This article is also available as aย PDF to download, print, and/or share, or listen to anย audio version here.

This point was forcibly driven home for me this week when I read the โ€œNew Zealand Pandemic Plan: A Framework For Action.โ€ This document has just been published by Health New Zealand laying out New Zealand policy in the event that WHO declares another pandemic. It is a prime example of an aspiring cabal of policy wonks stuck in the past, unable to change gear and move forward. For 211 pages the document rambles on rubber stamping all the mistakes of the Covid pandemic response. It dictates that in the near future, we will do it all againโ€”lockdowns, masks, vaccines, antivirals, mandates, social distancing, isolation, school and business closures, and censorship of media content.

How is it possible that Health New Zealand managed to validate all their previous pandemic actions when phase one of the Royal Commission of Inquiry doesnโ€™t report its findings until November? The answer to this conundrum may not be too far from the chief commissioner, who was himself involved in discussions which formulated Covid policy. A sort of self-saucing chocolate pudding arrangement, whereby you can have your cake and eat it too.

In an extraordinary display of dictatorial hubris and misplaced self-assurance, the document hails the Covid vaccine program as effective and safe, and an ideal model for future responses. Pandemics are flagged as zoonotic (from animals) in origin, no mention at all of the now widely accepted laboratory escape of biotech gain of function products.

Detecting and monitoring longer term morbidity and sequelae are described as established policy, along with informed consent, whilst failing to recognise this didnโ€™t happen during the Covid pandemic. Our alarming and continuing rate of excess deaths doesnโ€™t get a mention, instead Covid pandemic policy is described as saving thousands of lives. Nor does mRNA vaccine induced immune suppression, now widely discussed in the scientific literature, get a mention.

Most chilling of all, the policy recognises the power of a medical officer of health, in conjunction with the police, to detain persons in isolation by force and to continue to do so until necessary prescribed preventive treatment has been administered. You know what that means.

A close reading of this provision reveals that Health New Zealand expects the right to wield very broad powers during future pandemics, even broader than those it was granted during the Covid pandemic. Despite the frightening written word, Health New Zealand is clearly out of touch with reality. They are not managing the current health of New Zealand, how could they possibly imagine their failed policies will succeed in future? They may well find that the public rejects their myopic vision.

The New Zealand Pandemic Plan: A Framework For Action makes no mention of exercise, nutrition, lifestyle, diet or meditation, all of which, as we have previously reported, strengthen the immune system and promote health. Education in these topics would genuinely prepare New Zealand for any future health threats. As previously reported those who exercised, followed a lighter diet, used herbal remedies, or got enough sleep had very significantly lower rates of hospitalisation from Covid. Together they constitute a truly preventive approach and a recipe for longevity which published studies show are tens of times more effective than the current trends of biotech allopathy (which Health New Zealand unthinkingly expects to enforce on an unwilling population).

The exercise of raw power without regard to fact or justice is not limited to New Zealand; It is threatening to overtake the world.

To get some temporary relief from doom and gloom, you might admire the display on the eastern horizon in the early morning before dawn where you will see two bright points of lightโ€”fiery red Mars and Jupiter, known as the planet of knowledge, coming closer together day by day. They draw level around the middle of the month. Despite the beauty, some are calling this combination the โ€˜fire of knowledgeโ€™โ€”an augury of conflict. Whether you believe this or not, given the state of the world no one will be much surprised if they are right.

Polarisation, disinformation and anger are growing everyday around the world. If you are a history buff, you will be aware that these conditions precede global conflict. Although it hasnโ€™t been much reported here in New Zealand, if you follow international news sources you will be aware of regional conflicts which are reaching boiling point. The protagonists are tied to larger super powers who supply much of the armament which helps fuel the conflict. There is a point that is reached when the stress in society becomes unsustainable and war erupts.

Conflicts almost always have ancient roots, indicating unresolved stress in collective consciousness, coming down through countless generations. It is as though whole nations are stuck in the past, unable to find common ground or rationalise and resolve their emotions to move forward.

The โ€˜fire of knowledgeโ€™ has another meaning altogetherโ€”it refers to the deep silence of inner consciousness which alone stands unaffected by the world of outer sensory experience. This is the purifying fire of inner experience which burns up the dross of confused misapprehension, past mistakes and stress leaving a pure clarity of knowledge and an ocean of real peace.

Just after the Hiroshima nuclear devastation, Clement Atlee, British Prime Minister wrote โ€œSince wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defences of peace must be constructed.โ€

How we individuals protect, nourish and develop our consciousness is critical to our personal peace, and that of the society and the world as a whole. In the materialist climate of the current age, many have forgotten about the essential spirit of life and its great power to unlock peace and well being. If there is one thing we can do now for the world, even in remote New Zealand, it is to revive or restart a journey to inner peace and well being.

For a forest to be green the individual trees must be green, for the world to be at peace, individuals must be at peace. If you can place peace within the reach of individuals, peace can be within reach for the world. Fortunately peace is not far away from us. Since time immemorial, peace has been found in the inner self. Jesus taught โ€œThe Kingdom of Heaven is within youโ€. Buddha taught โ€œPeace comes from within, Do not seek it without.โ€ Gandhi added โ€œ”The greatest power in the world is that of the Soul. Peace is its highest expression.โ€

Madness is threatening to overwhelm the world, but never forget that fate is in our hands. Consciousness, our own inner self, operates at the fulcrum point of the cosmos. Peace and well being are tied together, we would do well to start learning about their essence, before it is too late. Our inner compass can see us safe through anything that is thrown in our path.

URGENT: Open Letter to Parliamentarians

0

Meeting the post-pandemic challenges facing the nation

I am writing to you on a matter of urgency that affects us all. Following on from the circumstances of the pandemic, the nation is facing new challenges on multiple fronts: with finances, the provision of healthcare, and regarding social and geopolitical relations. How we meet these in the coming months and years will define us as a nation going forward.

This article is also available as aย PDF to download, print, and/or share, or listen to anย audio version here.

This open letter is not seeking to assign blame for past mistakes, nor does it expect that the government alone is responsible for meeting these challenges. We must all recognise that our circumstances have radically changed during the last four and a half years. In some key cases, the values and practices in common use before the pandemic have become inappropriate or obsolete today. This is due to significantly altered circumstances.

It may well be that some of our past ideological standpoints are now outdated, our preconceptions about what is right and reliable may be mistaken and in need of reconsideration. Discovering what will be in the best interests of both the nation and the individual is a task requiring deep thought and the consideration of comprehensive evidence.

Government decisions are being made daily in an effort to chart a course ahead. The pandemic years have taught us that a wrong step now may have catastrophic consequences, even in the near future. We consider two of these in a spirit of scientific caution and common sense.

Constitutional challenges

The current parliament is proposing to deregulate biotechnology. This is an extraordinary step to be taking at this time. During the pandemic, biotechnology applications were de facto deregulated. The government of the day invoked Clause Five of the NZ Bill of Rights: Justified Limitations thereby setting aside basic human rights in the process of approving and enforcing novel mRNA vaccinations on the public. In addition, Covid-19, which is now widely understood to have originated in a laboratory, proved impossible to contain, In effect, it introduced itself into our nation without government approval or regulation.

Since 2021, New Zealand has suffered an excess mortality rate, which is continuing week by week up to the present time. Official figures reported to the OECD are conservatively in excess of 10% above the historical trend. Once population rises are accounted for, in excess of 50 people are dying each week unexpectedly. 50 lives lost to families, industry and the nation.

Having invoked the exception clause in the New Zealand Bill of Rights, it is incumbent on the current government to prove that this decision was in the public interest, not with rhetoric, but with facts and figures. Increasingly, evidence is being published in the scientific literature which strongly supports an adverse health effect of mRNA vaccination. To decide the issue, the only vital source of relevant evidence is a comparison of health outcomes between the vaccinated and unvaccinated segments of the population by age and condition. The fact that this information remains out of public view in New Zealand is a violation of our constitutional principles which state:

  1. The Rule of Law

Legislation should be consistent with fundamental constitutional principles, including the rule of law. Officials should carefully consider the impact of fundamental constitutional principles on proposed legislation or regulation , particularly when the legislation will:

  • change the relationship between citizens and the State in a fundamental way (for example, by encroaching on the operation of democratic processes, individual dignity or liberty, equality before the law or access to the courts);
  • modify or remove safeguards and limitations imposed on the exercise of State functions (for example, the rule of law, human rights, the spirit and principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, or natural justice).

The scope of the rule of law has at its core the following principle:

  • Everyone is subject to the law, including the Governmentโ€”People and institutions that wield power must do so within legal limits, and be accountable for their actions; everybody is equal before the law and is subject to it. The application of legislation to the Government itself is a cornerstone of a fair and free society.

2. The Principle of Legalityโ€”the dignity of the individual and the presumption in favour of liberty

All law is made (and, when enacted, should be construed by courts) against a matrix of values and principles that are regarded as fundamentally important to our legal system. These values and principles can be expressed at differing levels of abstraction. Fundamentally, they concern human dignity and liberty but these terms embrace a broader set of rights and freedoms that include:

  • the right not to be deprived of life;
  • physical integrity of oneโ€™s body, including freedom from medical treatment or scientific experimentation without consent;
  • freedom of conscience, religion, expression, association, assembly, and movement;
  • liberty, in the sense of freedom to make fundamental personal choices as to how one lives oneโ€™s life; and
  • procedural fairness, often referred to as natural justice.

The expectation of our constitution is that legislation and regulation will be construed and applied in light of these abiding values. As long as the government omits to release mortality data comparing the health outcomes of those who received mRNA vaccines with those who did not, it cannot reasonably deregulate biotechnology without violating our fundamental constitutional framework as outlined above.

It is of particular concern that a major priority of the governmentโ€™s biotech deregulation plan is the creation of a NZ mRNA Platform. This programme is already funded and in progress without any assurance of the safety of the platform, in fact with clear scientific evidence to the contrary. There are reasonable expectations and available evidence that the experimental outcomes of such a programme, on humans, animals and plants, will not be able to be contained. It may contaminate our food system and impact public health.

It is our contention that serious mistakes and omissions were made during the pandemic creating risks of such concern that they cannot be allowed to be repeated.

Therefore any deregulation of biotechnology should be paused until Phase 2 of the Covid-19 Royal Inquiry is able to report its findings on risk and safety.

Public Health Measures

The government has announced the appointment of a Commissioner, Professor Lester Levy, to oversee the operation of Health New Zealand. According to Health Minister Dr. Shane Retiโ€™s announcement, Health New Zealand is overspending its budget by $130 million per month. Reti said “The issues at Health New Zealand stem from the previous government’s mismanaged health reformsโ€ฆ. Our intention is to secure a better future for health in Nea Z.โ€

Whatever the causes, Health New Zealandโ€™s problems far exceed financial shortfalls or overspending. Leaked figures show there has been a surge in cardiac admissions, cancer incidence, and other health conditions. For example an 83% increase in cardiac hospital admissions in the Wellington Region.

Professor Levy in accepting the appointment revealed his family had experienced health issues during the past year. In this he is joined by hundreds of thousands of families across New Zealand. The potential causes have been masked by the pandemic education programme undertaken with cross party support which rammed home the โ€œsafe and effectiveโ€ mantra in the complete absence of long term health and safety assessments. This cloaked the nation with an extraordinary blanket of misinformation. As a result, the possible causes of a very large number of individual cases and family tragedies have been obscured. It is time to rectify this situation.

Moreover we are overdue for facts and figures which detail the massive growth of illness by category. Without this crucial evidence, no government attempts to improve the service of Health New Zealand will be successful. The health problems are too large and too unprecedented. They have novel causes.

Deep scientific and integrity issues

The issues surrounding biotechnology deregulation and public health are deep scientific issues requiring specialist assessment. Because of this, parliamentarians have become vulnerable to commercial lobbying. This influence comes from the pharmaceutical sector and the academic community, both have unreasonable expectations of continuing funding for biotechnology experimentation and implementation in a deregulated environment.

Much of the lobbying effort for biotech deregulation, and the governmentโ€™s response to it, is based on unsubstantiated hype about the efficacy and safety of products and their economic prospects.

The suggestion that our trading partners will eat up โ€˜sustainableโ€™ biotech food doesnโ€™t hold water. Tebrito, a Swedish firm producing food from mealworms, has just filed for bankruptcy following low consumer demand, despite millions of investment. Beyond Meat is currently in talks with bond holders to restructure its finances following disappointing sales. The stock price of biotech giant Moderna, an mRNA vaccine maker, is down to $120 as of yesterday off from its high of $484.

Therefore I am writing to urge caution, careful consideration of prior outcomes and research, and full public disclosure of up to date health data.

This should be assessed along with the benefit of expert advice that is free of commercial interest. The links embedded in this letter are there to provide you with the details of a precautionary view. Without such a probing risk assessment, we will be destined to perpetuate and repeat the same pandemic mistakes.

In closing I have to point out that this letter does not revolve around dry points of constitutional procedure or administrative efficiency. Nor is it about the judgement of history at some future time. It concerns the current health and life of individual citizens today, this week and every week, and the well being of the nation as a whole. At this time when past abuse in state care is receiving so much attention, we must remember a government and its members stand or fall on the integrity of their actions.

There are very deep principles of democracy and legitimacy at stakeโ€”the duty of care for its citizens that a government must evidence. But more than this, every week human life is ebbing away from families and the nation sooner than in the past. It is the task of politicians to face this squarely. If we continue to turn our back on relevant facts, refuse to investigate and ignore the plight of those affected we will continue to suffer the dire and growing consequences into an uncertain future, or with courage the present time can be a turning point in the history of our nation. It is in your hands.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

Principal at GLOBE and the Hatchard Report

Short and Sweet: The Appalling Decline in Mainstream Journalism

The lead article in the New Zealand Herald on 21st July entitled โ€œWellington company director Finlay Thompson loses 30kg taking Ozempic, wants medication fundedโ€ was written by youthful journalist Ethan Manera. Ethan, who began his career in 2023, is described by the newspaper as a multimedia journalist bringing us premium expert opinion.

This article is also available as aย PDF to download, print, and/or share, or listen to an audio version here.

The article recounts the case of company director Finlay Thompson who was overweight at 138kg at the beginning of last year. The enterprising Finlay enrolled in what the article described as a US-based drug trial of Ozempic. As a result, he received free treatment for weight loss. His weight fell as he continued with the weekly injections of Ozempic and after nine months stabilised at 108kg. He is worried that his period of free treatment is coming to an end and he is now asking the government to fund Ozempic for people like himself who wish to lose weight.

Finlay, who is managing director of Dragonfly, a high flying international data analysis company based in Wellington, told the paper that he had struggled with his weight because he overeats. According to Finlay โ€œI have no off buttonโ€. Finlay had tried a number of diets over the years and sometimes succeeded in losing weight, but always eventually put the weight back on. Finlay now sees Ozempic as a simple permanent solution, if only the government will financially back him and others like him.

Unbelievably, in compiling his front page article urging the government to fund the medication, Ethan forgot to mention that Ozempic costs $1550 for each one monthโ€™s supply. The 2021 NZ Health Survey found that one third of adults are overweight, in total about 1.35 million people. If the government were to fund Ozempic as a universal weight loss drug, the annual cost would be up to $25 billion if everyone opted in, close to our present entire national health budget.

No worries though, the article ploughs on quoting Finlay: โ€œWhen youโ€™re carrying around that extra weight, life is quite hard, itโ€™s not fun, every day is a problem. No doubt Finlay is right, obesity is a known risk factor for a number of health conditions including heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol, liver disease, sleep apnea and certain cancers, but is Ozempic a permanent or even safe solution? Short answer: NO.

Buried somewhere in the article was a telling sentence. โ€œThompsonโ€™s drug trial, however, has a catch; next month he has to stop taking Ozempic and begin a new medication.โ€ You see, Finlayโ€™s free drug trial was not testing Ozempic per se. Ozempic has been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes since 2017 and is available here in NZ for the condition. The drug trial was to test the effect of a secondary medication designed to alleviate the problems associated with stopping Ozempic. How Ethan missed highlighting this point is mind boggling.

Read the scientific literature and you will find that Ozempic is a drug in growing trouble. Clinical research findings on the safety of Ozempic indicate that its active ingredient semaglutide induces primarily mild and transient gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances and increases the risk of cholelithiasis (gallstones), but recent findings by researchers also suggest a long-term risk of pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer, and diabetic retinopathy (DRP, which can cause blindness).

An article on July 4th in the UK Daily Mail warns โ€œOzempic could make you go BLIND warn experts as worrying study finds patients on the drug are more likely to suffer irreversible optic nerve damage“. The medical director at NHS England warned the drugs can be dangerous and should not be seen as a ‘quick fix’ ;for people who ‘just want to lose a few poundsโ€™. The article reports side effects including loss of sexual function, kidney damage, organ failure, cancer, and many more

An article on June 3rd headlined โ€œWoman will never eat solid food again after weight-loss drug caused horror bowel injury that nearly killed her – as ‘thousands’ suffer devastating side-effects from Ozempic and Mounjaro, bombshell lawsuit claims“. The suit claims that conditions linked to Ozempic, Mounjaro and similar drugs include gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), bowel obstruction and intestinal blockage. Attorneys allege the drugs have also caused ‘malnutrition, dehydration, neurological disorders, and even death’.

A 11th July headline shouted โ€œShocking number of people are QUITTING Ozempic amid growing list of debilitating side effects“. It reports a study of US pharmacy data showing 9 out of 10 people quit using semaglutide drugs early because of adverse effects. The drug has even been cited as causing the loss of a sense of fun, contributing to cases of depression and suicide. The findings are also significant because previous research shows that when patients come off the drugs, as many as 80 percent put the kilograms back on.

Novo Nordisk, Ozempicโ€™s maker, pushed back replying to the Mail: it ‘does not believe these data are sufficient to draw conclusions about overall patient adherence and persistence to various GLP-1 medicines, including our treatments.โ€™ No wonder there is a desire to postpone concern to a distant future, Novo made a profit of NZ$15 billion in the first three months of 2024 alone on the back of its weight loss drugs.

It does only take a minute to find articles like those above, and many more in other newspapers, along with references in learned journals. So how did premium expert journalist Ethan miss them? Perhaps in his rush to make the front page, he didnโ€™t have time to look:) Or if he did do his due diligence, did he think that putting a superficial gloss on the facts would be just right for his readers or did he perhaps decide to shield Novo Nordisk from any criticism? You tell me.

Weight loss methods are one of the biggest lifestyle business sectors on the planet. This makes weight loss a very attractive target for pharmaceutical companies anxious to profit from the new class of biologic drugs that alter the fundamental parameters of our physiological functions. Biologics are drugs that promise miracle cures but typically cause very high rates of serious side effects as Ozempic does (see our article โ€œThe Fundamental Flaw in Biotech Medicineโ€ for more information on biologics and regulatory issues).

How much of our so-called journalism is now covert advertising and lobbying we may never know. Ethan could have looked a little more deeply into alternative approaches to weight loss that donโ€™t involve high cost and shocking side effects, but he chose not to, instead touting an injection that for many recipients will ruin their health. Sound familiar? This all goes to illustrate the misleading content of much mainstream journalism these days. This comes at a time when our health system is collapsing and excess deaths are at record levels, a time when we need informing and protecting more than ever before. Journalism seems to be absent at the wheel. Here in NZ people who do research, ask questions and expect answers have been labelled conspiracy theorists, what should we call journalists who donโ€™t ask questions? Any ideas?

What Has Become of Our Country?

The University of Auckland has announced that it is joining a research project of national significance co-hosted with Victoria University of Wellington and supported by the University of Otago and the Malaghan Institute of Medical Research.

This article is also available as aย PDF to download, print, and/or share, or you can listen to anย audio version here.

The project is to develop an mRNA vaccine platform. They plan to turn research into drug development, clinical testing and manufacture at an industrial scale. The plan has been signed off, presumably by Judith Collins MP, Science, Innovation and Technology Minister, and the participating universities. It has so far attracted an initial $70 million funding.

Curiously, the announcement quoted Professor John Fraser, Dean of the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences as saying of the pandemic: โ€œIt is difficult to contemplate what would have happened to the world if a treatment, one with 95% efficacy, had not been developed. Consider the impact that continues to this day.โ€ (Yes, we have been. This article reveals the actual efficacy is around 1-2% and this article examines the ongoing impacts of the Covid vaccination program)

Professor Fraser might have missed his calling, he possibly could have done stand up comedy. 95% efficacy (?????) To do what? Prevent transmission? No, everyone knows by now that even with four or more shots you can still catch Covid. Reduce deaths? No, excess deaths are at record levels.

According to the announcement, the speed at which those vaccines were developed has become legendary (possibly infamous might have been a better word choice). โ€œNew drugs traditionally take decades to develop, trial and bring to market, but mRNA techniques enable far faster development while also opening up new approaches for medical treatments.โ€ (There are very good well recognised reasons for caution in drug trials).

The announcement bristled with biotech bombast and a list of future cures that have been just around the corner for fifty years but never realised. According to Fraser, โ€œThe potential is that you can put a gene for anything inside our cells and the cells become the bioreactors.โ€ One wonders the extent and scope of experimentation that will be undertaken and whether any pathogens might escape from labs. No, that couldnโ€™t possibly happen.

He continues: the advantage to New Zealand is that with our own research and development facilities we will be able to replicate the rapid mRNA Covid vaccine development in the near future when the next inevitable pandemic arrives, most likely bird flu he speculates.

Joking aside, there are some very serious scientific issues here that seem to have been missed. The absence of long term testing has not proved to be a virtue but a huge liability. A paper entitled โ€œExploring the possible link between the spike protein immunoglobulin G4 antibodies and cancer progressionโ€ is a case in point. It concludes:

โ€œRepeated inoculation with messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines elicits immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibody production. Such an increase in the concentration of specific and non-specific IgG4 antibodies allows the growth of some types of cancer by blocking the activation of effector immune cells.โ€

The researchers at the University of Auckland, and the other institutions involved, undoubtedly should know about the suspected effects of Covid vaccine-induced IgG4 antibodies on immunity and turbo cancer development. The matter has been the subject of considerable scientific debate.

A paper in Nature entitled โ€œHumoral profiles of toddlers and young children following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination” found that toddlers and young children develop unusual elevated levels of IgG4 following mRNA vaccination.

It doesnโ€™t take a rocket scientist to put the findings of these two papers together (there are also many other relevant papers). This should be sufficient to raise questions about the long term safety of the mRNA platform and its propensity to cause cancers.

Indeed a preprint paper entitled โ€œA Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnatyยฎ: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on the Existing Literature” does just that. It examines a case study of lymphoma immediately post vaccination and summarises all currently scientifically published cases of cancer post mRNA vaccines and what might be the causes of such events. It posits six cancer forming mechanisms that might be triggered by mRNA vaccination.

So why are the researchers confidently assuring the NZ public that they will shortly be curing us of cancer, autoimmune disease and inherited genetic illness, rather than causing it?

The answer possibly lies in what has happened to our country over the last four years:

  • Scientific and academic dissent and debate has been suppressed in our education and medical systems. Anyone wishing to keep their tenure is very careful to avoid criticising mRNA vaccines, in fact in many professions you still have to be vaccinated to keep your job.
  • The courts have enforced the rights of any parent wishing to Covid vaccinate their children over their partner wishing to exercise caution. They have also failed to cross-examine government experts, thus ensuring a single mRNA narrative is overriding the provisions of our Bill of Rights.
  • All political parties (with the exception of NZ First) accept the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccination and the need for universal compliance. Incredibly, the government is now deregulating the biotechnology sector of which the announced NZ mRNA Platform is a step.
  • A government alliance with social media companies and mainstream media has completely shut down any public debate on Covid vaccines. Part of an ongoing widespread covert program to censor social media content that Elon Musk has just exposed.
  • The government funded a disinformation project which dismissed those questioning Covid origin and vaccine safety and efficacy as unintelligent, antisocial, extremists bent on undermining democracy. They funded documentaries aired on public television naming and shaming individuals.
  • The government has used regulations to prevent any comparison of the health outcomes between unvaccinated and vaccinated populations. In one instance, launching a high profile criminal case against a Ministry of Health whistleblower.

The last point closes the door on reality, without access to this comparative data any valid assessment of the safety of Covid vaccination is impossible.

I could go on, but you can understand that in this controlled and highly censored environment, the risky fantasies of biotechnology researchers easily have free rein. It seems that any opportunity to receive government funding, however risky the outcomes, can be grabbed with a clear conscience. No one will know what is really at stake, nor will anyone have a public forum for their legitimate questions.

Letโ€™s refer back to the studies cited above. One of them involves little children who had virtually zero risk of a serious outcome from Covid infection but a calculable serious risk from Covid vaccination in the short term and an unquantified risk over the longer term. Yet the public was still pressured to vaccinate their children with mandates and a false โ€œsafe and effectiveโ€ narrative. Is it morally wrong, as the government repeatedly suggested, to ask questions under these circumstances? You tell me.

Subjecting healthy children to risky novel medical interventions when they are not ill or at risk was judged an abhorrent criminal offence at trials held more than 75 years ago, but not now it seems.

What is being proposed by the University of Auckland, their partners and the government is not science as we understood it four years ago, because science involves the collection and comparison of evidence from multiple sources and its analysis from different perspectives. For four hundred years, post Galileo, science has been a public process, subject to debate and scrutiny, but no longer. Medical science is being redesigned to become an instrument for financial gain, status and a tool of the oppressive state.

In the press announcement of the NZ mRNA Platform, the spin doctors have been hard at work. Fraser tells us that โ€œwhat we do now [medicine pre-mRNA] is crude and primitiveโ€. The article presents mRNA as a sort of insurance policy against future catastrophes. Asked what exactly the program will target, Fraser sounded a vague note of reassurance for a bright future:

โ€œItโ€™s too early to say right now, and weโ€™re not pinning ourselves to any specific disease, but, of course, I have my favourite ones. What we will do is look at diseases that are most relevant to us, that the rest of the world is not doingโ€ฆ. Within seven years, the mRNA platform will be operating, and I would expect to see a number of homegrown therapeutics and clinical trials underway.โ€

So apparently they have been given carte blanche to experiment. Having followed the biotech industry and worked on the safety testing and certification side, I have been hearing statements like this for more than 30 years. Seven years is a long enough time frame to ensure that funding and investment continues in the absence of any benefits. When seven years is up, another glowing prospectus of future benefits will be carefully crafted. All the while, in the growing climate of censorship, no one will be able to talk about the mounting failures and adverse effects.

Biotechnology is a very technical area of knowledge. The other day chatting with a friend he asked me what I did with my time now that I am retired, when I mentioned biotechnology safety, he said it was beyond his pay grade and drew the conversation to a close. Biotechnology is something that we have all been subjected to without explanation. If we donโ€™t inform ourselves we will be confined by it without right of appeal. I pity our country which is firmly and finally closing the door on our right to be informed. We are being securely locked up.

A Message from New Zealand for the World

There are so many new findings surfacing on pandemic effects, and some old chestnuts, that it is sometimes difficult to choose what to write about.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and/or share, or you can listen to an audio version here.

For example, excess deaths in New Zealand continue high. OECD figures show that counting 2023 and the first 16 weeks of 2024, mortality is 6,300 deaths above the previous trend, up 15%. 2024 is up 14% at 1300 deaths that is 81 deaths every week in our small country above the historical trend. Growth in population is entirely unable on its own to explain these alarming figures. New Zealand is not alone, highly vaccinated countries share this trend.

Moreover, new findings are pointing to the prevalence, or almost exclusivity, of excess deaths found among the vaccinated segment of populations. It is a crisis of unprecedented proportions that should be absorbing the full attention of governments. However, the determination to avoid and negate these findings remains at a near total level. British MP Andrew Bridgen, for example, was expelled from the Tory party for even raising the issue publicly.

Here in New Zealand, the public wouldnโ€™t know because of the continuing mainstream media blackout, and the misdirection orchestrated by the medical authorities and the governmentโ€”the pretence that the main cause of the health crisis is health service resourcing and drug availability.

In scientific circles, the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination are denied by the simple expedient of refusing to acknowledge that it can cause anything other than a very restricted list of conditions, of which the main one is myocarditis. In other words, a generalised impact on immune system function, for which there is increasing evidence, remains off the table for any discussion. As long as this fiction is maintained, COVID-19 vaccination could not be causing excess deathsโ€”a denial of the bleeding obvious.

In fact, the greatest mystery of the Covid pandemic is how so many minds have become closed to the obvious. Today, we live in a world of polarised, angry ideas and illogical actions. Having repeatedly raised the issue of excess deaths and met a brick wall of blank faces, we have realised the almost pointless or even counterproductive effect of raising the same issues over and over again with the same unresponsive people. Instead of dancing outside the fire circle and trying to attract the attention of those who are misdirecting the narrative, we have chosen to go back to the beginning and discuss the ABCs of biotechnology risks and more importantly the methods of self-healthcare that are known to work. We make no apology for writing at length. In the absence of fundamental understanding we would be lost.

The human gut and intelligence

The UK Daily Mail reviews a new book coming out at the end of the month entitled Genius Gut in an article this week under the headline “Looking after your gut can make you happier, less stressed and boost your memory, reveals DR EMILY LEEMING. Here’s the six unusual science-backed ways to do itโ€.

In her book, Leeming explains the importance of regular daily routines, getting your hands dirty in the garden, avoiding processed foods, regular exercise, and eating more fibre, especially whole grains, fruit and veg. The result is a healthy gut microbiome. Our body teems with microorganisms, they out number our human cells 10 to 1. Being small they comprise 1 to 3 percent of our body weight but they are still crucial for good health, particularly mental health.

A 2014 study entitled “The Gut Microbiome and the the Brain” concluded

โ€œGut microbes influence memory, mood, and cognition and are clinically and therapeutically relevant to a range of disorders, including alcoholism, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and restless legs syndromeโ€

An article published in April 2024 entitled โ€œCan your gut microbiome influence intelligence?โ€ answers this question in the affirmative. Gut bacteria influence fluid intelligence. Although researchers are still working to understand the precise links between gut bacteria and health, one thing is now clear: We need a thriving gut microbiome to ensure good physical and mental health.

The article identifies 15 โ€œgoodโ€ bacteria associated with positive health markers and 15 โ€œbadโ€ bacteria associated with poor health markers. It reports that scientists are continuing to study the gut microbiome and uncover connections between our resident bacteria and a range of health conditions, including hypertensiondiabetesobesity, and heart disease.

The so-called gut-brain axis connects your gut and brain, allowing a two-way conversation. Part of this connection is formed by the vagus nerve, which runs between the brain and gut. It plays a role in several important functions, including digestion, mood, and the immune response.

In fact our gut is โ€˜conversation centralโ€™ when it comes to DNA. Surprisingly to researchers, successive studies and reviews have concluded that both the animal and human gut are hotspots for horizontal gene transfer, as discussed in this paper โ€œGene transfer events and their occurrence in selected environments“.

Step back and the big picture is fascinating, the gut is a microcosm of the global biological ecosystem of microbes and our brain relies on its connection with this microcosm to maintain its intelligence and health.

From the above you can see that scientists resort to human analogies when it comes to the mobility of DNA and the transfer of genetic information. Some of the words used to describe our connection with our gut bacteria for example are telling: โ€œhappy gutโ€, โ€œtalkโ€ and โ€œtwo-way conversationโ€ are frequently used. This is entirely appropriate, we are exchanging information with our food, talking with our food. The quality and type of our food affects our health and our intelligence.

The implication is clear, our consciousness is affected by genetic information in our food. This is transferred via the gut where the right balance of bacteria is essential. This can be maintained by a diet based on the genetic intelligence contained in fresh natural food.

The gut is the machine which transfers food with foreign DNA into material compatible with our own individual unique genetic profile. Digestive processes filter and transform food through complex pathways and multiple steps over an extended time so that the end product can match and support our physiological health and stability, and it now also seems our mind. I discuss this concept more fully in my book Your DNA Diet.

Bypassing the immune system

There is another even more important take home from these findings. The gut contains an area of physiology walled off from the rest of the body. This is a matter of safety first. Failure of this wall, such as happens with a burst appendix for example, can be fatal if not treated immediately. Foreign DNA whether from bacteria or viruses is not welcome in our body. In large quantities, it can be fatal. In this context, bypassing the gut is inherently risky because it bypasses multiple digestive processes and safeguards designed to protect and support health.

This article contains amazon.com affiliate links, which means that IF you click on one of these links and buy something from Amazon, we MAY receive a small commission payment – at no extra cost to you.

Take another step down this road into the history of biotechnology. Twenty five years ago a book was publishedย โ€œThe River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDSโ€ย (Amazon link) by Edward Hooper, a journalist. This monumental piece of investigative research and medical detective work closely and specifically identifies the start of the HIV epidemic with the development in 1957 of a live polio vaccine cultured in the kidneys of primates. By 1959, the resultant vaccine had been fed to nearly a million people (most of them children) in the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi.

Hooper details the astonishing geographical correlation between the 1959 mass polio immunisations in Africa and the first recorded outbreaks of HIV. He questions whether the contamination from simian viruses in the kidneys eventually led to human infection with HIV. Since that time more than 30 million people have died of HIV over a period of 65 years. Find more detail on the controversy surrounding this topic here: The origin of Aids by Matt Ridley.

Hooper’s book was reviewed by the Guardian in 1999. The conclusion of the review warns:

โ€œThis book represents nothing less than a version of the Faust myth for our age. There have been scaremongers for every revolution. Some have been right, others wrong. But on the eve of a biotechnological future, scientists and all of us would do well to read The River (Amazon Link). For it is not often that one can say that the tensions in a book are those at the heart of civilization and its so-called progress.โ€

Would that the then nascent gene therapy industry had heeded the warning. The origin of AIDS could be connected with the process of vaccination which bypasses the gut and its safety mechanisms. Africans had been eating bush meat for millennia without developing AIDS. A novel experimental program of mass vaccination possibly became the channel for HIV to jump from primates to humans where, once transferred, it thrived.

Step forward to the Covid pandemic

The mass mRNA Covid vaccination programme not only penetrated the skin and thus bypassed the gut, it was also specifically designed to bypass the cell membrane and take control of the transfer of genetic information within the cell. In doing so, it transferred information from a coronavirus re-engineered in a lab to be more deadly than those occurring in animal populations. Three barriers, three immune defence mechanisms were crossedโ€”the gut, the skin and the cell membraneโ€”by both the Covid virus and the vaccine. As a direct result of this, 7 million people have died within the last four years.

There is a lot more to come. Not only are biotech scientists still re-engineering deadly viruses through gain of function research around the world, but also the whole biotechnology industry is focussed on technologies to cross one more barrier. They are intending to cross into the cell nucleus, the deepest heart of the cell, and re-engineer the essence of what makes us human through germline genetic engineering of nuclear DNA.

As Jennifer Doudna, inventor of CRISPR gene editing technology, affirms in her 2017 bookย โ€œA Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolutionโ€ (Amazon Link):

โ€œโ€ฆ.have no doubt, this technology will โ€” someday, somewhere โ€” be used to change the genome of our own species in ways that are heritable, forever altering the genetic composition of human kind.โ€

That day is now upon us.

Under the guise of improving health and unlocking human abilities, scientists like Doudna, millions of them working in the biotechnology industry all around the world, are planning to use their limited intelligence and myopic vision to alter what makes us human and keeps us healthy. Those working in biotechnology represent themselves to the public, or even to themselves, as benefactors of health. In reality, they are herding mankind step by step towards the precipice of destructionโ€”a precipice capable of swallowing everyone up, including the perpetrators themselves.

Aside from the tsunami of ill health and excess death which has come on the heels of the pandemic and the biotech response to it, how is it possible that the obvious effects on the mental health of entire populations have been missed? As we look at the spectacle of two decrepit individuals vying for the presidency of the most heavily armed nation in the world, what perhaps defies imagination is not the men themselves, but the fact that hundreds of millions of people have unthinkingly voted to nominate them.

Recently, one of my colleagues wrote from the UK that apparently, people have almost forgotten about COVID-19. It wasnโ€™t even mentioned in the hours of election night coverage. Donโ€™t think that by forgetting about the pandemic and getting back to so-called normal life, everything will go away. There is more to come from the powerful interests that are financing and promoting the rush to our biotechnology future.

It is necessary not only to protect our own health but the health of the world also.

An opinion piece from the UK Telegraph reprinted in the NZ Herald is entitled โ€œWhat my daughter said to make me give up wine for good“. One comment from the author caught my eye โ€œwhen your health, as mine has been in the past year, is suboptimal including a fibromyalgia diagnosis and a string of debilitating migraines[both suspected adverse effects of Covid and COVID-19 vaccination] then all health-leeching habits must go, including wine.โ€

We agree, we need to cast a wide net, everything should be done to support our health. We have urged improvements in diet, exercise, daily routines and habits and the practice of meditation and reflection, but the looming threats to health also require that we speak up about the dangers of biotechnology. We are on the brink of disaster, a situation where it is dangerous to give up our voice. The qualities required are โ€œpersistence and convictionโ€.

Our voice should not just be limited to the immediate need to review what went wrong during the pandemic and who was to blame, but should also urgently address the dangers inherent in biotechnology in general. At our website GLOBE.GLOBAL you will find a range of articles that will completely alter any rosy but entirely false opinion about biotechnology โ€˜safety and efficacyโ€™ you may have acquired from the media, PR propaganda, investment advice, or even from school or college. Our articles are carefully referenced to published papers in learned journals and established research findings.

Biotechnology is capable of wrecking even worse havoc and destruction in the near future. There is a compelling need for the International Genetic Charter. Its simple terms spell out in a few sentences the safeguards necessary to protect human life from genetic degradation. Please take a couple of minutes to sign up to The International Genetic Charter here.

We are so grateful to those in New Zealand who have woken up and share our concerns. New Zealand’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates hurt the nation so deeply that we are determined to share our experiences with the world. We are grateful to our small team of researchers and the range of correspondents and colleagues who are trying to reach the widest audience. We also want to thank those of you who have donated so that we can manage to continue our service. Your ongoing support is what keeps us going.

If you can manage to help, you can donate to:

Directly into our bank account:
Hatchard Report 03-0275-0056783-001
or by Credit/debit card (international donors)

Books mentioned in this article are available on Amazon.com

The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS by Edward Hooper

A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Jennifer Doudna

Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World by Dr.Guy Hatchard

This article contains amazon.com affiliate links, which means that IF you click on one of these links and buy something from Amazon, we MAY receive a small commission payment – at no extra cost to you.

Government Announces Biotechnology Deregulation is Coming to New Zealand very soon. What Will It Mean for Us?

0

The Government has announced that during the next three months, it will take Cabinet decisions on new regulations to remove the ban on genetic engineering and enable the safe (???) use of gene technology in agriculture, health science, and other sectors (???). Following the Covid pandemic, the word โ€˜safeโ€™ has a very hollow ring to it. So what exactly will deregulated biotechnology look like, what projects will get the green light in New Zealand, who is involved, and is it safe?

This article is available as a PDF to download, print and share.

What Will Deregulated Biotechnology Look Like?

America has a biotechnology industry that fiercely lobbies the government to forestall any regulation. Integrated DNA Technologies, for example, is a company that sells โ€œall of the reagents needed for successful genome editingโ€ with kits designed for delivery into human cells beginning at $95. Over at a site called GeneCopoeia, a CRISPR Cas9 protein with a nuclear location signal starts at $69. A multitude of US companies seem to offer everything to get you going editing and cloning at home.

If you donโ€™t fancy making designer babies, you might like to order a deadly pathogen and see if you can make it any better at its job. This is not a joke, everything is available mail order delivered right to your door. In deregulated America, a huge community of biohackers has grown up dedicated to doing anything that can be done to human life as we know it. It was in this environment that American scientists were able to divert US government grants to Wuhan to build lethal coronaviruses.

What Projects Will Get the Green Light in New Zealand, and Who Is Involved?

In the first instance, biotechnology deregulation will particularly impact our traditional food sources. Already, at least $195 million has been funnelled into research to reduce ruminant methane emissions. The coalition government has pledged another $400 million to AgriZero to fund ongoing research. AgriZero is a joint government/private partnership tasked with researching โ€˜toolsโ€™ that will drive down ruminant emissions.

Partners Are Fonterra, Ravensdown, Silver Fern Farms, Rabobank, Asb, Anz, Synlait.

The โ€˜biotech solutionsโ€™ researched so far include vaccines, boluses (pills), feed additives, and GE grasses. Biotech PR dreamers have sold the idea that all of these tools will reduce ruminant methane. Letโ€™s not forget that methane is produced from normal digestive processes from animals that have been roaming the planet in large numbers for thousands of years without warming the globe.

An entire industry including universities and biotech companies (complete with unaccountable and highly paid board members, CEOs, etc) has already been born, all holding out their hands to the government to secure a never ending income stream for biotechnology experimentation. This industry is born out of the vague promises of gene dreamers that it will be โ€˜safe and effectiveโ€™ and the discredited notion that animal methane emissions are at the heart of climate change.

The levy and advocacy groups (Beef + Lamb NZ, Dairy NZ and Federated Farmers) all enthusiastically and naively support the research and development of biotech tools. Beef + Lamb NZ is also receiving government funding for its CoolSheep program that is researching low methane genetics even though this is at the expense of true productive traits that farmers have bred into New Zealand flocks for decades.

Multiple other projects are in the pipeline. The government recently established an RNA Platform to identify and support opportunities for New Zealand in areas such as human health and the health of other animals. It builds on global progress in the use of these technologies, most notably the development of mRNA vaccines.

As part of a series of Fast Start projects funded through the RNA Platform, investment has been approved for AgResearch scientists to provide a proof-of-concept for the application of mRNA vaccines in livestock, specifically to address Bovine Viral Diarrhoea (BVD). Nor are RNA Platform programs limited to animal research; they include crop science and human mRNA vaccines. There is a very broad brush at work

Just stop for a moment and think; as we have reported before, consumers do not want food with tinkered genes. Artificial meat companies are failing overseas. Our export partners are buying our agricultural products relying on our clean green grass fed image. Why throw that away?

AgriZero thinks otherwise. It believes that biotech animals with a low methane profile will be an international selling point to our increasingly discerning (???) international customers. Good luck with that. I used to work at Genetic ID, which built an international business out of GE free testing and certification. I can tell you that consumer suspicion of genetically modified food runs very deep indeed. You can only sell it widely if you are not required to label it. Something that the unregulated US market has embraced to the detriment of food traceability, safety, and consumer choice.

The AgriZero partnership is well aware of consumer disquiet; therefore, it operates behind a wall of secrecy. When asking detailed questions about safety, viability, efficacy, etc. you get short vague platitudes like this one from Rabobank:

โ€œPlease be reassured that Rabobank is continuing to work hard in the best interests of our clients and the wider sector.โ€

ASB Bank replied that it supports AgriZero because it wishes to

โ€œAccelerate the development of emissions reduction technology to get tools into farmersโ€™ hands soonerโ€ฆ that will reduce agricultural emissions by 30% by 2030โ€ฆin order to satisfy our trading partnersโ€

Do I detect an echo of the โ€˜warp speedโ€™ Covid vaccine development program that ignored safety and efficacy issues?

You might also be interested to learn that the dollars being invested by our government are not just staying here in New Zealand. AgriZero has invested $9.9 million into a US ag-biotech company ArkeaBio, a Bill Gates start-up, who are looking at methane vaccines. Why is New Zealand funding Bill Gates???

Representatives of BiotechNZ recently travelled to the BIO International Convention in San Diego and came home with the following wide ranging wish list for New Zealand biotechnology applications:

  • Acting as a feedstock for GMO fermentation processes.
  • Addressing immediate needs, such as reducing methane emissions from cows or reducing agricultural waste
  • Protecting products or industries at risk, like creating pest-resistant crop varieties or Bovine Viral Diarrhea (BVD) resistant cattle.
  • Addressing animal welfare concerns, such as producing cattle without horns or improving cattle thermotolerance.
  • Meeting consumer demands for specific traits, preferences for firmer fruit, longer lasting, or more nutrient-dense products.

I get the sense from the available correspondence that overseas interests are determined to dictate climate terms to our farming sector that will include the introduction of costly proprietary genetic technology. The costs and risks of this will fall on farmers, the high salaries will go to the technocrats, and the profits will go elsewhere. This has been the structure of US agriculture since the introduction of GM crops.

Is Biotechnology Safe?

If you have been following our websites HatchardReport.com and ;https://globe.global you will be well aware that research shows biotechnology applications have proved neither safe nor effective. The scientific findings need to be studied and absorbed at length. Off target effects and unanticipated outcomes are an inherent feature of gene editing. The proposed biotechnologies aimed at methane reductions and crop characteristics will contaminate our traditional foods with novel genetic sequences with as yet unknown consequences for animal and human health.

Fortunately there will be a wide ranging Covid inquiry starting in November that will provide a forum for discussions about safety, but in the meantime it is apparent from the governmentโ€™s biotechnology deregulation policy that they are determined to prejudge the issue and ignore the evidence of safety concerns.

The history of biotechnology in the US is very instructive in this regard. Jennifer Doundna, inventor of CRISPR gene editing technology, reported in a recent interview with Walter Isaacson that at first โ€œthe idea of editing a childโ€™s genes felt unnatural and scary for humanityโ€. But after a conference of biotechnologists in 2015, the idea began to recede in her thinking and was replaced with the thought โ€œthat someday we may consider it unethical not to use germline editingโ€. This kind of free market thinking dominates the sector. When biotechnologists get together their depth of self belief is astounding. Feeding off each otherโ€™s wildest fantasies, the push to remove regulation and ignore the risks is overwhelming.

Our academic and commercial biotechnology sector is no different, past failures with animal welfare and crop science are forgotten and the lessons ignored, in the rush to attract investment.

The experience of the COVID-19 pandemic should be a wake-up call. A deadly pathogen created through gene editing escaped easily from a lab and infected the worldโ€™s population. An mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was rapidly developed that proved neither safe nor effective. We are still grappling with the aftermath of millions of excess deaths. Biotechnology cannot be contained or recalled.

The events speak to a compelling need for the International Genetic Charter. Its simple terms spell out in a few sentences the safeguards necessary to protect human life from genetic degradation. Please take a couple of minutes to sign up to The International Genetic Charter here. Lobby your representatives to inform themselves fully of the risks.


Many thanks to Methane Science Accord for their research findings which have been very helpful in writing this article. You can review their website here.

The True Extent of Biotechnology Experimentationโ€”Itโ€™s Happening Now

0

The New Zealand government plans to deregulate biotechnology. What does that mean for our food supply and our health?

A comprehensive presentation by Kate Mason at the recent 100 year Biodynamic Conference in Australia cast light on the true extent of biotechnology experimentation currently underway and also on the techniques being used to deceive the public about its intent and scope. For one hour at a staccato pace, Mason flashed document after document on the screen detailing the involvement of national and international government and corporate interests determined to alter the nature and content of our food supply. If you can manage it, it is a truly frightening watch. It spoke volumes about the need for the International Genetic Charter.

Wildly imaginative biotech projects are being sold to governments by corporations under the cloak of a glossy facade of virtue signalling using deceptive buzz words like sustainable development, regenerative agriculture, increased resilience, climate smart mitigation, crop surveillance, strategic development, the food and agribusiness green revolution, transforming and future proofing the food system, zero hunger, innovation, the fourth industrial revolution, increasing consistency, nurturing the planet and feeding the world. Whew!!!

Biosynthetic food products are even being falsely promoted as more nutritious than organic food. None of this is backed by sound science. Although most, if not all, of these projects are doomed to fail and will ultimately disappear off the menu, along the way our taxes are being diverted to pay the handsome salaries of biotechnology schemers hungry for profit and fame, and boost corporate profits. More importantly, the experimentation will leave a toxic legacy of persistent genetic pollution which will continue to undermine plant health and human longevity through the generations.

Here are some of the main take home lessons of Masonโ€™s detailed research into the murky world of biotechnology experimentation and promotion.

Food is being designed in labs and manufactured in biosynthetic fermentation vats and vertical farms. This involves unregulated gene editing of crops and animals using CRISPR gene editing proven to have unpredictable effects but without any requirement to label end point foods.

Genetic modification of plant root systems to enhance carbon storage.

Synthetic meat such as lab grown quail whose genes are forced to multiply using unspecified genetic promoters in a medium of barley containing pig genes. The synthetic quail also contains biosynthetic vitamins and added minerals to โ€˜enhanceโ€™ or rather โ€˜correctโ€™ its deficient nutritional profile. This is about to be released in Australia and described as GMO free.

Food made from insect protein whose production is robotically controlled by AI technology in giant mega factories. Yes, these factories are being built right now and they are winning plaudits and awards from UNESCO.

Milk and cheese that doesnโ€™t come from cows, but from GM yeasts engineered to mimic milk production described as GMO free. All currently funded by Australian government partnerships with industry and venture capitalists. An echo of what we can expect coming soon here in New Zealand.

Tracking and tracing of food using blockchain leger systems from farm (or rather biovat) to fork distributed via the internet. This includes certification of food production methods to ensure it is good for the climate. This will effectively cede control of all food production and marketing to corporate and government interests. This will be deceptively disguised on your mobile phone app as if you now own a share in a farm or an animal and are actively saving the planet by eating ethical, safe, low carbon footprint, (biosynthetic) food (???).

3D printed food which you can make and shape to look like real food on your home kitchen printer using liquid coloured ink goos made from repurposed old food re-enlivened with biosynthetic additives and then delivered to your door by Woolworthโ€™s drones. Donโ€™t laugh, mad biotech scientists admired by government and media wonks are busy making it already and cooking it with lasers. This BBC article โ€œWhy 3D printed food is set to go mainstreamโ€ describes it as โ€˜healthierโ€™. Yummy!!!

Agricultural production organised around future foods biohubs able to monitor and control giant farms using AI surveillance. Crops are then synthesised into a variety of end edible (???) products with little resemblance to the original plants using precision (???) fermentation. The proposed food production processes use recombinant genetic techniques to bring together DNA from multiple sources. The first of these is being set up in Mackay, by the Queensland government because it is a centre of sugar production, a raw ingredient essential for the biosynthetic processes involved.

Genetically modified crops used to produce biofuels whose production will compete for land use with food crops.

Implanting tech devices in cows to monitor and control their microbiome in real time with the ultimate aim of producing personalised medicinal (???) milks. Yes, it really is happening.

Globalisation of the food production system including gene modification and patenting, pest management, fertilisation, distribution, and marketing. Capturing the global food market is potentially the most profitable business on the planet. Everyone has to eat every day. Governments are already partnering with the big multinationals in these areas. Fuelled by endless United Nations encouragement and reports.

A Global One Health System for human, animal, plant and environmental health using biotech pharmaceutical products. This is another agenda of the UN in partnership with the World Economic Forum, the WHO and corporate interests (principally including pharmaceutical giants) which is designed to change the way we view food. A.K.A. Resetting the Table for Pharmafood. This is being picked up by governments as they design national nutrition policies based on UN global models that are being talked about as โ€œbetter and more nutritious for usโ€. Included in this agenda are plans to mandate the content and menu of school lunches.

Within this wide ranging agenda is the production of vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs in GM plants and in animals whose distribution or effect cannot be contained or recalled. Yes, it really is happening now in hundreds of labs around the world and being talked about and funded in the corridors of power.

There is just one small problem, none of this biosynthetic food and medical technology is actually healthy or proven safe. The growth of biosynthetic food ignores the mass of research findings which verify that diets rich in natural foods improve health and longevity. They reduce your risk of cancer and heart disease, the number one killers, whereas processed foods do the opposite.

For example a study of the eating habits of 126,000 people over 9 years published on June 10 2024 by the Lancet entitled โ€œImplications of food ultra-processing on cardiovascular risk considering plant origin foods: an analysis of the UK Biobank cohort” found that whereas consumption of natural plant-based food lowers the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality by 13%, ultra-processed plant based foods increase the risk of CVD mortality by 12%.

All over the world supermarket shelves are being filled with unhealthy food, but consumers are not being told about it, We are being lulled into complacency by government pronouncements on safety and sustainability, lax regulations and certification which are being driven by cosy partnerships with biotech pharmaceutical giants, food conglomerates and globalist organisations. These novel synthetic foods are being described in glowing and deceptive terms and it is all about to get far worse and more controlled.

None of this makes any sense, nor does the level of control seem possible until we remember what we have just been through during the pandemic. Fantasy can become reality when information is controlled. The exact processes being employed by those developing synthetic foods are hidden behind patents and the lack of any labelling requirements. Thirty years ago people were concerned enough about their traditional foods to demand labelling of genetically modified content. The time has come to renew these demands. They are even more urgent now. Get ready to protect our natural food sources, sign up to The International Genetic Charter here. Its simple straightforward provisions lay out requirements for labelling and protection from biotechnology experimentation. Please share it widely.

Here in New Zealand, our government is pledged to deregulate biotechnology, precisely the opposite of the lessons we should have learned from the pandemic response. Who makes these kinds of decisions? Are they in their right minds? The wild promises of the biotechnology industry lobby are empty, but worse still they cloak severe and unpredictable levels of risk. We should remember the disastrous genetic experiments on cows in New Zealand fifteen years ago sponsored by the government. Our food security and trade are the last things we want to place at risk. The situation requires a long hard look at the reality of consumer preferences and safety. Biotech PR promising sustainable development and improved health which is influencing government policy and ideas does not match the published scientific assessments, quite the reverse.

A Truly Preventive Health System is Urgently Needed

0

Over the last couple of weeks I have given a number of interesting interviews. If you missed them, you might like to catch up on the replays. These include Rodney Hide on RCR, where we discuss Ayurveda, diet, and health also with Paul Brennan on RCR Breakfast, where we discuss the International Genetic Charter; and Marc Morano on TNT (who has a global audience), where we had a wide-ranging discussion.

I also had a comprehensive interview with Leighton Smith on his Newstalk ZB podcast series which brings me to todayโ€™s topic. Leighton was correctly concerned, as I know many of you are, that those responsible for rigidly enforcing lockdowns and mandates should be held to account, especially if they overstepped the mark. Ashley Bloomfieldโ€™s name was cited. Dr Bloomfield was formerly Jacinda Ardernโ€™s Director General of Health who zealously enforced Covid vaccine mandates even for many known to be already vaccine injured. Leighton and I had a difference of emphasis on this point, I feel we need to cast a very wide net and change the fundamental direction of bioscience research in addition to focusing on individual roles.

* hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

I am currently reading The Code Breaker* by prolific biographer Walter Isaacson. Isaacson gushes praise for biotechnology and especially for biotechnologists. He references cures for genetic disorders such as Huntingtonโ€™s, sickle cell anaemia and cystic fibrosis and writes as though these are already available. He also expects cures for deafness, blindness, cancers, depression, etc., and anticipates designer babies all sorted for height, IQ, skin colour and strength.

His naive, unquestioning acceptance of this industry’s public relations hype and wild bioscience fiction astounds me. None of the above โ€˜curesโ€™ exist. If he had done some deeper research, Isaacson would have struggled to uncover even one example of long term safe benefit from biotechnology. Commercial biotechnology is a vast industry built on dreams.

One of the discoverers of the structure of DNA, James Watson, writes in his biography The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA *that on completion of their model, his partner Francis Crick rushed into a pub in Cambridge shouting โ€œwe have found the secret of lifeโ€. As it has turned out, Crick might have better announced โ€œWe have found out how to destroy the secret of lifeโ€.

Along with sequencing the human genome, biochemists, rather like kindergarten children with their first scissors, began a program of cutting and snipping to alter the secret of life and find out what they could do without the help of nature or God. The discovery of DNA began an era of biotechnology that has become a global industry with one million people employed worldwide generating half a trillion dollars of revenue in 2022, but producing virtually no actual cures of disease or beneficial products. The opposite in fact, a vast industry built on a failed understanding of life that is delivering death and disease to millions.

This brings me back to Ashley Bloomfield. He is just one player functioning in a vast network of mistaken scientific endeavour whose paradigm casts them as guardians of the secret of life. Apparently this somehow gives biotechnologists the right to tell everyone in the world what to do. Precisely the project that Dr. Ashley Bloomfield now chairs at the World Health Organisation.

So how do you reverse a global scientific consensus which mistakenly believes itself to be the gatekeeper of the secret of life, but understands almost nothing about how cellular genetics supports conscious life?

Back in the 90โ€™s I presented evidence concerning the risks of genetic modification of foods before the New Zealand Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. The labelling of GM foods became a cause that captured the publicโ€™s imagination and I am sure initially protected many from harm. Although unfortunately synthetic biotechnology has since crept into the processed food sector largely unannounced and unlabelled.

I remember around that time there were also a number of discussions about the risks of gene technology in the health sector. There was a general feeling among those working in biochemistry that nothing should jeopardise the search for cures to genetically inherited diseases like cystic fibrosis. So virtually nothing was said on this subject at the Commission hearings.

In retrospect, this reluctance to publicly flag the potential risks of experimental gene therapy was a huge mistake. It allowed experimentation with novel gene interventions to continue more or less unimpeded. Its regulation was left to the enthusiastic biotechnologists who were conducting the research themselves. The fox was guarding the hen house, and the stage was set for Covid-19.

Last week we published The International Genetic Charter and invited you to sign up to its simple provisions designed to protect the public from harmful biotechnology experimentation. If you havenโ€™t already done so, please sign and circulate the charter. This can be a first step to enhance public awareness of the risks and remedies. To fix the vast problems in the health and food sectors that biotechnology is creating, regulation and information will be insufficient on their own. To persuade public acceptance of change you need to offer alternatives.

When it comes to food you donโ€™t have to look very far. Articles on the benefits of fresh whole foods and the dangers of ultra processed foods appear almost daily in the popular press. Like these in the Guardian entitled โ€œUltra-processed foods are ultra-bad for you. Hereโ€™s what to know” and โ€œI went a week without ultra-processed foods. Hereโ€™s what I learned“. These are backed by serious science. A wide range of inflammatory diseases including diabetes and many others are affected by poor quality food and benefitted by a fresh diet. The risk of developing the big killers including heart disease and cancer can be significantly reduced if you follow simple lifestyle and dietary guidelines.

Modern medicine has developed powerful diagnostic tools which have proved invaluable in the early detection of disease. More recently genetic tests have began to reveal that some people may inherit a predisposition to certain diseases. There is an ongoing debate on the ethics of treating diseases that havenโ€™t yet developed and might never do so. Especially when the treatments can themselves be ineffective and even harmful.

So can you go even further than these? Ayurveda, the ancient health science of India still practiced widely today, offers its own system of early detection and treatment. Ayurveda understands the body in terms of three fundamental principles or doshas: Vata (roughly information and transport systems), Pitta (digestion and transformation systems) and Kapha (structure and stability systems). According to Ayurveda, it is the balance between these three systems that determines health.

Ayurveda utilises a pulse diagnosis system that is able to detect the early genesis of illness before any overt symptoms of disease develop. It describes the development of disease in six stages.

  1. Imbalance: Lack of coordination between the doshas develops
  2. Location: The imbalance moves and locates in a particular part of body
  3. Accumulation: The imbalance grows and deposits obstructing material
  4. Decay: The accumulated material festers
  5. Symptoms: The first serious overt symptoms appear, such as discomfort, pain, swelling or rash, etc.
  6. Disease: The effects spread and become an identifiable disease

Ayurvedic diagnostic techniques can detect these early stages of imbalance and then offer multiple treatment modalities paired with the specific characteristics of the imbalance to restore balance between the doshas and thus prevent the disease before it arises. These interventions may include simple dietary and lifestyle advice, herbal supplements and specific procedures to cleanse the accumulated waste products.

Perhaps some of the more surprising features of Ayurveda are its simple and easily acquired self help preventative steps that can be followed at home. Including self-pulse diagnosis, body typing, daily routines, yoga, meditation and self cleanse procedures such as oil massage. Find out more about preventive health care in my book Your DNA Diet.

The predominance of allopathy and now biotechnology appears to be sowing the seeds of future disease rather than offering cure. More than 50% of adults now suffer from chronic or persistent illness. Palliative medications such as painkillers are overused and abused. Antibiotic resistance is growing. As a result, bacterial infections are becoming extremely difficult to treat. Fungi, parasites and viruses are also developing drug resistance.

To cap it all, mass use of mRNA vaccine technology has been identified in an article published by the BMJ as a factor contributing to excess deaths. It warned that side effects linked to the Covid vaccine had included ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome and brain haemorrhage, cardiovascular diseases, coagulation, haemorrhages, gastrointestinal events and blood clotting.

The massive gains in longevity over the last two hundred years are mainly due to improvements in hygiene, diet, housing, sanitation and lifestyle. During the last decade this long standing direction of improving longevity has begun to reverse. This should be ringing alarm bells in the medical profession where the reliance on allopathy and now biotechnology has overshadowed the far more effective and safe measures of preventive medicine. This imbalance needs to be corrected. Comprehensive information on preventive measures needs to be incorporated into our educational and health systems. It is worth remembering that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. If we want to repair our wounded and weary health service we need to revisit this old adage and take it very seriously indeed.

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

The Long Essential Read: The Dam is Breakingโ€”The Biotech Bubble is Bursting

0

For the last couple of years, the Hatchard Report has been asking the government and the medical establishment to compare the health outcomes of the vaccinated with the unvaccinated. There has been a wall of silence. Along with many others publishing, we have tried to break through to influence decision-makers with little obvious success up till now.

If you have been reading our reports you will know that the issue is very serious indeed. Excess deaths, hospitalisations, chronic illness, cancers and workplace absenteeism due to sickness and disability have all risen to record levels, but most of those in authority have been stone-walling this data.

Late last week the dam began to break with a little trickle of regret, following the news that a former Japanese Minister for Internal Affairs Kazuhiro Haraguchi had apologised directly to the citizenry for Covid-19 vaccine campaigns at a rally, and openly acknowledged that the tidal wave of sudden deaths presently occurring among the Japanese population is almost entirely of the Covid vaccinated group. Google is already trying to suppress and discredit even this note of apology.

Then, as we reported yesterday,ย the New York Times admitted that the evidence that Covid came from a Lab in Wuhan is overwhelming. Saying:

โ€œIt is undeniable that U.S. federal funding helped to build an unprecedented collection of SARS-like viruses at the Wuhan Institute, as well as contributing to research that enhanced them.”

Now the prestigious British Medical Journal has published an article โ€œExcess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: โ€˜Our World in Dataโ€™ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022” which reports:

โ€œThe highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1โ€‰,256โ€‰,942 excess deaths (P-score 13.8%) in 2021, the year in which both containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines were used to address virus spread and infectionโ€ฆ..and continued high (808,392) in 2022, when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continuedโ€ฆ..This raises serious concerns. Government leaders and policymakers need to thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.โ€

This in itself is not unique a few other scientific papers have made the same suggestion, but what was unique is the response of the UK Daily Telegraph who headlined โ€œCovid vaccination may have helped fuel rise in excess deathsโ€”Experts call for more research into side effects and possible links to mortality rates“. The dam has broken. The link between Covid vaccination and excess mortality is no longer a taboo subject.

We are one step ahead of the media here at the Hatchard Report. If both Covid and Covid vaccines are killing millions of people and still doing so, why arenโ€™t they banned? If both Covid and Covid vaccines are products of biotechnology experimentation why isnโ€™t it banned. Yesterday we publishedย The International Genetic Charterย which calls for just that.

Sign up toย The International Genetic Charter

New Zealand mainstream media frequently reprint articles from the UK Daily Telegraph. Will they have the courage to reprint the latest bombshell news from mainstream science, or will they continue their weak and implausible excuses for the current wave of heart disease, cancers, strokes and neurological illness swamping our health system, as it is among all highly vaccinated nations?

New Zealand media is not alone in their lack of in-depth analysis. The UK Daily Mail says sleep after a tipple of alcohol while airborne can be fatal and fumes โ€œwhy eating one chip is like smoking a cigaretteโ€. It also blames low fibre diets for a sudden surge in colon cancers. The NYPost agrees as it reports โ€œColorectal cancer is rising rapidly among young adults“. It also reports that a staggering 61% of US adults will have cardiovascular disease by 2050 if current accelerating trends continue, and by way of explanation it offers: โ€œbecoming a father might be bad for your heart“.

The scientific issue here should be obvious. If something suddenly starts to accelerate you have to look for explanations that donโ€™t simply refer to prior established behaviours. People have been tippling on planes, fathering children, falling asleep and eating to much sugar for centuries, this canโ€™t account for a sudden precipitous rise in excess deaths. This is the essence of scientific thinking, and thank God that some scientists are waking up.

Covid vaccination increases your risk of dying from Covid

A paper published in Frontiers in Immunology originating in Ohio, USA is entitled โ€œBrief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19โ€.

The study looks at the outcomes of 152 adults hospitalised with Acute Renal Failure (ARF) at Ohio State University hospital. ARF is a common problem in intensive care units and typically results in mortality rates between 50% to 80%. Of the patients, 112 had severe Covid and 40 did not have Covid. The study reports significantly higher death rates among the Covid vaccinated (p=0.002). It also found higher levels of IGg4 antibodies among the vaccinated, indicative of increased immune tolerance (impaired immune system efficiency).

The non-vaccinated Covid positive ARF patients had a mortality rate of 37%, but the vaccinated Covid patients had a rate of 70% almost twice that of the unvaccinated. In a masterly use of understatement, the authors concluded:

โ€œThese results suggest that among hospitalised patients, prior vaccination may not always be indicative of protection against mortality.โ€

It is results like these that are starting to raise eyebrows among those working in frontline medical services and research. Dr. Mikolaj Raszek, a genomist working in biosynthesis, is a case in point. Dr. Raszek, who has his own company Merogenomics in Canada, blogs on YouTube. Early on in the pandemic, Raszek sat on the fence and wondered how effective Covid vaccines would be. He has now changed his tone completely to one of deep concern. You can watch him analyse the above paper at this link.

Dr. Raszek reports he is in contact with a number of scientific colleagues who quietly share his concerns. One of them informed Raszek of a paper published way back before the pandemic in 2012 entitled โ€œImmunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus“.

SARS Cov 1 was a severe virus that emerged in China in 2002 and was eventually contained. To this day no one knows where it came from. Because of a concern about a reemergence or a deliberate release of the SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated around that time. The results of this study are concerning: it found that when a prototype Covid vaccine was administered to rodents they developed severe pulmonary disease. The authors warned in their conclusion:

โ€œMice administered any of the vaccines led to occurrence of Th2-type immunopathology suggesting that hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV components was induced. Caution in proceeding to application of a SARS-CoV vaccine in humans is indicated.โ€

You can imagine how I felt yesterday while reviewing this paper. Eight years before the Covid-19 pandemic, scientists knew about the risk of an accidental or deliberate release of a new version of SARS Cov 1 and they also knew that the disease had an unusual feature: vaccines made the symptoms worse.

Yet somehow biotechnologists in both the West and East decided to initiate gain of function research which developed more virulent types of coronavirus. Upon its escape from a lab, they forced the widespread use of a range of novel biotech Covid vaccines on the public following minimal and obviously inadequate safety testing as though we were a bunch of rats to be experimented on while mad people tried to play God. Given what was already known to science, none of this makes any sense unless there were much darker motivations somewhere in play.

Dr. Raczek is not alone in the pursuit of scientific reality. Dr. Willian Makis, a New Zealand surgeon working in a provincial hospital blogged on Substack a couple of days ago under the title โ€œConfessions of a New Zealand Surgeonโ€. Check it out. He reports the absolute chaos in our health system due to the surge in illness which he and some of his colleagues relate to vaccine induced immune deficiency.

It doesnโ€™t stop there.ย An in-depth analysis by Dr. Ursula Edgingtonย compared 2020 with 2023 and found that New Zealand Department of Transport staff suffered 188% more sick days, 130% more unpaid leave days and a 85% increase in bereavement leave.

Problems are not confined to the Health Service and our transport system, the NZ Herald reports โ€œSchools hit by wave of winter illnesses, worsening teacher shortage” but fails to connect this with Covid vaccines.

More and more invasive medicines and vaccines are in the pipeline

Unbelievably, the attitude of governments and regulators has stiffened back towards mandatory compliance. And to cap it all, the World Health Organisation wants to directly control the health policy of governments around the world. It appears to be all drifting out of our control into the hands of big pharma and their adherents, as excess deaths continue.

You can see the problem canโ€™t you? So far we seem to have been whistling in the wind, but as the dam is breaking it is more important than ever to speak up and share the information. It canโ€™t be allowed tot happen again. If we give in and forget the struggle, we will not be able to return to any semblance of pre-covid normality.

The goal posts have changed, we need to set them back to original values. During the pandemic people were trained through media appearances and 24/7 coverage not to ask questions. As a result, everyday medical consultations are now planned to involve the use of biotechnology along with the inherent serious risks but without informing the public what they are. The adverse effects and huge costs are on us, and the profits lie with the providers.

You donโ€™t have to look very far away to appreciate what is being designed for us. An article in the UK Daily Telegraph is entitled โ€œHow Ozempic became the new wonder drugโ€. It gets right to the point in the first paragraph with a quote from a nutritionist speaking at a recent conference: โ€œSemaglutide [the active ingredient in Ozempic] should be put in the water supplyโ€.

The comment was supposedly in jest, but a couple of paragraphs later we find that a trial of semaglutide (GLP-1) on people with a Body Mass Index (BMI) higher than 27, who are therefore at risk of cardiovascular disease, led to reductions in weight. As a result Dr Riyaz Somani, a consultant cardiologist at University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, said: โ€œThe implications are huge and are likely to lead to changes in current practice.โ€ For this, read: soon to be prescribed routinely and widely along with a coercive approach on the part of the health service.

Semaglutide is administered through weekly injections whereby it directly interacts with GLP-1 receptors in the brain reducing appetite. An EU conference entitled Select very recently discussed the use of semaglutide to treat not just obesity but also Alzheimers, Parkinsonโ€™s, mental illness, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and you name it.

The problem lies in the range of side effects, they are extensive, long term and serious as we have discussed in previous articles. My point here is not to bang the same old drum of alarm but to point out that few if any decision makers are listening. So what should we do and who will listen?

The effects of gene editing are not containable.

The products of biotechnology experimentation can affect everyone indiscriminately, spread without limit and blight succeeding generations. They cannot be recalled. Yet the urge to play God among the original promoters of biotechnology and the obscene pursuit of profit among the commercial arm of biotech has been so powerful that any sense of caution has been deliberately abandoned.

I am reminded of that iconic scene in Ripley Scottโ€™s 1979 movie Alien when Sigourney Weaver asks Ian Holm, playing the part of the chief scientific officer, why did he break with established protocol and let the infected crew member into the ship, endangering everyone? Holm replies that he took an executive decision even though according to protocol it wasnโ€™t his to take.

Pre-pandemic, even the death of one participant in a vaccine trial would have been enough to raise red flags. Now the post-pandemic authorities are devoid of any wisdom of hindsight, the commercial biotech juggernaut is barreling ahead with little or no regard for public safety.

Our response isย The International Genetic Charter which sets a benchmark not just for those of us who are determined to avoid the unfolding biotechnology catastrophe, but for humankind as a whole. For very good and scientific reasons we want to rebuild a life free of biotechnology experimentation. It is a statement of need and intent. It is short and to the point. Please read it and sign up your support. It will just take a couple of minutes of your time. You can circulate it to your friends and colleagues. This should no longer be a taboo subject. Scientific journals and some mainstream papers have began to admit the facts and the implications for public policy and accountability. Write to you MP and demand protection from biotechnology experimentation.

Sign up toย The International Genetic Charter

Download, print, or share theย PDF version of the Genetic Charter.

Game Changing Initiative: The International Genetic Charter

0

The World Health Assembly of WHO has announced that agreement has been reached on an amended version of the proposed International Health regulations to take effect in the event of another pandemic or global health threat. The assembly of 194 nations committed itself to seek ratification of the amended regulations within 12 months.

Sign up to The International Genetic Charter

The amended regulations were drafted under the co-chairmanship of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield of New Zealand and Dr Precious Matsoso of South Africa. Dr Bloomfield was formerly the New Zealand Director General of Health under the government of Jacinda Ardern. Dr. Bloomfield was responsible for enforcing COVID-19 vaccination mandates that were arguably the most restrictive and coercive in the world.

In the same week, the New York Times did an abrupt volte-face. After four years of doggedly insisting COVID-19 crossed into human populations from animals, it published a very detailed guest essay explaining โ€œWhy the Pandemic Probably Started in a Lab, in 5 Key Points“. The article reported:

โ€œIt has been estimated that at least 25 million people around the world have died because of COVID-19, with over a million of those deaths in the United States. Although how the pandemic started has been hotly debated, a growing volume of evidence โ€” gleaned from public records released under the Freedom of Information Act, digital sleuthing through online databases, scientific papers analysing the virus and its spread, and leaks from within the U.S. government โ€” suggests that the pandemic most likely occurred because a virus escaped from a research lab in Wuhan, China. If so, it would be the most costly accident [???] in the history of science.โ€

There is nothing in the article which suggests any steps have since been taken to ensure it canโ€™t happen again.

What should our response be? Looking forward towards the long term future, what should we be asking for? GLOBE has formulated โ€œThe International Genetic Charterโ€ which can be viewed and downloaded as a PDF. This lays out exactly what rights and safeguards are needed as a minimum to protect populations from genetic exploitation and abuse in the food and medical sectors.

Sign up to The International Genetic Charter

The International Genetic Charter sets out our individual and collective genetic rights, including the cessation of gain of function research, the right to full disclosure of substituted ingredients in food that have been modified or copied by biotechnology processes, the right to refuse any intervention that may alter our genetic functions, the right not to be subjected to misleading propaganda, vaccine mandates and many more.

The International Genetic Charter sets a benchmark for those of us who are determined to avoid the unfolding biotechnology catastrophe. For very good and scientific reasons we want to rebuild a life free of biotechnology. It is a statement of need and intent.

God helps those who help themselves. As Newton found, every action has an equal and opposite reaction. Whether you believe in Godโ€™s Will or physics, doesnโ€™t really matter here, the sweep of history shows there are always consequences to our actions. The wise know that the cycle of time moves to destroy the destroyer, while those that adhere to truth find it has its own strength. As you sow so shall you reap. This rule of universal karma is too easily forgotten but can never be sidestepped. You canโ€™t escape it.

The effects of gene editing are not containable. They can affect everyone indiscriminately, spread without limit, and blight succeeding generations. They cannot be recalled. Yet the urge to play God among the original promoters of biotechnology and the obscene pursuit of profit among the commercial arm of biotech has been so powerful that any sense of caution has been deliberately abandoned.

First we are inviting you to read The International Genetic Charter. At this critical time, the wide circulation of this document is very important. You can sign up to the International Genetic Charter. You can help in many other ways too which are set out in the charter.

Download, print, and share the PDF version.

This article was originally published on globe.global