There are so many new findings surfacing on pandemic effects, and some old chestnuts, that it is sometimes difficult to choose what to write about.

This article is also available as a PDF to download, print, and/or share, or you can listen to an audio version here.

For example, excess deaths in New Zealand continue high. OECD figures show that counting 2023 and the first 16 weeks of 2024, mortality is 6,300 deaths above the previous trend, up 15%. 2024 is up 14% at 1300 deaths that is 81 deaths every week in our small country above the historical trend. Growth in population is entirely unable on its own to explain these alarming figures. New Zealand is not alone, highly vaccinated countries share this trend.

Moreover, new findings are pointing to the prevalence, or almost exclusivity, of excess deaths found among the vaccinated segment of populations. It is a crisis of unprecedented proportions that should be absorbing the full attention of governments. However, the determination to avoid and negate these findings remains at a near total level. British MP Andrew Bridgen, for example, was expelled from the Tory party for even raising the issue publicly.

Here in New Zealand, the public wouldn’t know because of the continuing mainstream media blackout, and the misdirection orchestrated by the medical authorities and the government—the pretence that the main cause of the health crisis is health service resourcing and drug availability.

In scientific circles, the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination are denied by the simple expedient of refusing to acknowledge that it can cause anything other than a very restricted list of conditions, of which the main one is myocarditis. In other words, a generalised impact on immune system function, for which there is increasing evidence, remains off the table for any discussion. As long as this fiction is maintained, COVID-19 vaccination could not be causing excess deaths—a denial of the bleeding obvious.

In fact, the greatest mystery of the Covid pandemic is how so many minds have become closed to the obvious. Today, we live in a world of polarised, angry ideas and illogical actions. Having repeatedly raised the issue of excess deaths and met a brick wall of blank faces, we have realised the almost pointless or even counterproductive effect of raising the same issues over and over again with the same unresponsive people. Instead of dancing outside the fire circle and trying to attract the attention of those who are misdirecting the narrative, we have chosen to go back to the beginning and discuss the ABCs of biotechnology risks and more importantly the methods of self-healthcare that are known to work. We make no apology for writing at length. In the absence of fundamental understanding we would be lost.

The human gut and intelligence

The UK Daily Mail reviews a new book coming out at the end of the month entitled Genius Gut in an article this week under the headline “Looking after your gut can make you happier, less stressed and boost your memory, reveals DR EMILY LEEMING. Here’s the six unusual science-backed ways to do it”.

In her book, Leeming explains the importance of regular daily routines, getting your hands dirty in the garden, avoiding processed foods, regular exercise, and eating more fibre, especially whole grains, fruit and veg. The result is a healthy gut microbiome. Our body teems with microorganisms, they out number our human cells 10 to 1. Being small they comprise 1 to 3 percent of our body weight but they are still crucial for good health, particularly mental health.

A 2014 study entitled “The Gut Microbiome and the the Brain” concluded

“Gut microbes influence memory, mood, and cognition and are clinically and therapeutically relevant to a range of disorders, including alcoholism, chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and restless legs syndrome”

An article published in April 2024 entitled “Can your gut microbiome influence intelligence?” answers this question in the affirmative. Gut bacteria influence fluid intelligence. Although researchers are still working to understand the precise links between gut bacteria and health, one thing is now clear: We need a thriving gut microbiome to ensure good physical and mental health.

The article identifies 15 “good” bacteria associated with positive health markers and 15 “bad” bacteria associated with poor health markers. It reports that scientists are continuing to study the gut microbiome and uncover connections between our resident bacteria and a range of health conditions, including hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and heart disease.

The so-called gut-brain axis connects your gut and brain, allowing a two-way conversation. Part of this connection is formed by the vagus nerve, which runs between the brain and gut. It plays a role in several important functions, including digestion, mood, and the immune response.

In fact our gut is ‘conversation central’ when it comes to DNA. Surprisingly to researchers, successive studies and reviews have concluded that both the animal and human gut are hotspots for horizontal gene transfer, as discussed in this paper “Gene transfer events and their occurrence in selected environments“.

Step back and the big picture is fascinating, the gut is a microcosm of the global biological ecosystem of microbes and our brain relies on its connection with this microcosm to maintain its intelligence and health.

From the above you can see that scientists resort to human analogies when it comes to the mobility of DNA and the transfer of genetic information. Some of the words used to describe our connection with our gut bacteria for example are telling: “happy gut”, “talk” and “two-way conversation” are frequently used. This is entirely appropriate, we are exchanging information with our food, talking with our food. The quality and type of our food affects our health and our intelligence.

The implication is clear, our consciousness is affected by genetic information in our food. This is transferred via the gut where the right balance of bacteria is essential. This can be maintained by a diet based on the genetic intelligence contained in fresh natural food.

The gut is the machine which transfers food with foreign DNA into material compatible with our own individual unique genetic profile. Digestive processes filter and transform food through complex pathways and multiple steps over an extended time so that the end product can match and support our physiological health and stability, and it now also seems our mind. I discuss this concept more fully in my book Your DNA Diet.

Bypassing the immune system

There is another even more important take home from these findings. The gut contains an area of physiology walled off from the rest of the body. This is a matter of safety first. Failure of this wall, such as happens with a burst appendix for example, can be fatal if not treated immediately. Foreign DNA whether from bacteria or viruses is not welcome in our body. In large quantities, it can be fatal. In this context, bypassing the gut is inherently risky because it bypasses multiple digestive processes and safeguards designed to protect and support health.

This article contains amazon.com affiliate links, which means that IF you click on one of these links and buy something from Amazon, we MAY receive a small commission payment – at no extra cost to you.

Take another step down this road into the history of biotechnology. Twenty five years ago a book was published “The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS” (Amazon link) by Edward Hooper, a journalist. This monumental piece of investigative research and medical detective work closely and specifically identifies the start of the HIV epidemic with the development in 1957 of a live polio vaccine cultured in the kidneys of primates. By 1959, the resultant vaccine had been fed to nearly a million people (most of them children) in the Congo, Uganda, Rwanda and Burundi.

Hooper details the astonishing geographical correlation between the 1959 mass polio immunisations in Africa and the first recorded outbreaks of HIV. He questions whether the contamination from simian viruses in the kidneys eventually led to human infection with HIV. Since that time more than 30 million people have died of HIV over a period of 65 years. Find more detail on the controversy surrounding this topic here: The origin of Aids by Matt Ridley.

Hooper’s book was reviewed by the Guardian in 1999. The conclusion of the review warns:

“This book represents nothing less than a version of the Faust myth for our age. There have been scaremongers for every revolution. Some have been right, others wrong. But on the eve of a biotechnological future, scientists and all of us would do well to read The River (Amazon Link). For it is not often that one can say that the tensions in a book are those at the heart of civilization and its so-called progress.”

Would that the then nascent gene therapy industry had heeded the warning. The origin of AIDS could be connected with the process of vaccination which bypasses the gut and its safety mechanisms. Africans had been eating bush meat for millennia without developing AIDS. A novel experimental program of mass vaccination possibly became the channel for HIV to jump from primates to humans where, once transferred, it thrived.

Step forward to the Covid pandemic

The mass mRNA Covid vaccination programme not only penetrated the skin and thus bypassed the gut, it was also specifically designed to bypass the cell membrane and take control of the transfer of genetic information within the cell. In doing so, it transferred information from a coronavirus re-engineered in a lab to be more deadly than those occurring in animal populations. Three barriers, three immune defence mechanisms were crossed—the gut, the skin and the cell membrane—by both the Covid virus and the vaccine. As a direct result of this, 7 million people have died within the last four years.

There is a lot more to come. Not only are biotech scientists still re-engineering deadly viruses through gain of function research around the world, but also the whole biotechnology industry is focussed on technologies to cross one more barrier. They are intending to cross into the cell nucleus, the deepest heart of the cell, and re-engineer the essence of what makes us human through germline genetic engineering of nuclear DNA.

As Jennifer Doudna, inventor of CRISPR gene editing technology, affirms in her 2017 book “A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution” (Amazon Link):

“….have no doubt, this technology will — someday, somewhere — be used to change the genome of our own species in ways that are heritable, forever altering the genetic composition of human kind.”

That day is now upon us.

Under the guise of improving health and unlocking human abilities, scientists like Doudna, millions of them working in the biotechnology industry all around the world, are planning to use their limited intelligence and myopic vision to alter what makes us human and keeps us healthy. Those working in biotechnology represent themselves to the public, or even to themselves, as benefactors of health. In reality, they are herding mankind step by step towards the precipice of destruction—a precipice capable of swallowing everyone up, including the perpetrators themselves.

Aside from the tsunami of ill health and excess death which has come on the heels of the pandemic and the biotech response to it, how is it possible that the obvious effects on the mental health of entire populations have been missed? As we look at the spectacle of two decrepit individuals vying for the presidency of the most heavily armed nation in the world, what perhaps defies imagination is not the men themselves, but the fact that hundreds of millions of people have unthinkingly voted to nominate them.

Recently, one of my colleagues wrote from the UK that apparently, people have almost forgotten about COVID-19. It wasn’t even mentioned in the hours of election night coverage. Don’t think that by forgetting about the pandemic and getting back to so-called normal life, everything will go away. There is more to come from the powerful interests that are financing and promoting the rush to our biotechnology future.

It is necessary not only to protect our own health but the health of the world also.

An opinion piece from the UK Telegraph reprinted in the NZ Herald is entitled “What my daughter said to make me give up wine for good“. One comment from the author caught my eye “when your health, as mine has been in the past year, is suboptimal including a fibromyalgia diagnosis and a string of debilitating migraines, [both suspected adverse effects of Covid and COVID-19 vaccination] then all health-leeching habits must go, including wine.”

We agree, we need to cast a wide net, everything should be done to support our health. We have urged improvements in diet, exercise, daily routines and habits and the practice of meditation and reflection, but the looming threats to health also require that we speak up about the dangers of biotechnology. We are on the brink of disaster, a situation where it is dangerous to give up our voice. The qualities required are “persistence and conviction”.

Our voice should not just be limited to the immediate need to review what went wrong during the pandemic and who was to blame, but should also urgently address the dangers inherent in biotechnology in general. At our website GLOBE.GLOBAL you will find a range of articles that will completely alter any rosy but entirely false opinion about biotechnology ‘safety and efficacy’ you may have acquired from the media, PR propaganda, investment advice, or even from school or college. Our articles are carefully referenced to published papers in learned journals and established research findings.

Biotechnology is capable of wrecking even worse havoc and destruction in the near future. There is a compelling need for the International Genetic Charter. Its simple terms spell out in a few sentences the safeguards necessary to protect human life from genetic degradation. Please take a couple of minutes to sign up to The International Genetic Charter here.

We are so grateful to those in New Zealand who have woken up and share our concerns. New Zealand’s COVID-19 vaccine mandates hurt the nation so deeply that we are determined to share our experiences with the world. We are grateful to our small team of researchers and the range of correspondents and colleagues who are trying to reach the widest audience. We also want to thank those of you who have donated so that we can manage to continue our service. Your ongoing support is what keeps us going.

If you can manage to help, you can donate to:

Directly into our bank account:
Hatchard Report 03-0275-0056783-001
or by Credit/debit card (international donors)

Books mentioned in this article are available on Amazon.com

The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS by Edward Hooper

A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution Jennifer Doudna

Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World by Dr.Guy Hatchard

This article contains amazon.com affiliate links, which means that IF you click on one of these links and buy something from Amazon, we MAY receive a small commission payment – at no extra cost to you.

Professor Michael Plank of Covid-19 Aotearoa Modelling and Te Punaha Matatini is a mathematical biologist and epidemiologist commissioned by the New Zealand government to deliver mathematical modelling of COVID-19 in support of the pandemic response.

Today, he advised us all to roll the genetic dice one more time and get another COVID-19 mRNA vaccine to avoid winter illness. Is he up to date on the risks for the individual and humanity? Let’s find out.

This article is available as a PDF document to download/print or share.

---

A team of doctors at the authoritative Harvard Medical School is offering us another opinion in the journal The Neurohospitalist under the title “Fatal Post COVID mRNA-Vaccine Associated Cerebral Ischemia”. The study discusses a case of a thirty-year-old female recipient of the Moderna mRNA Covid shot who subsequently developed circulatory and inflammatory problems in her brain followed by a fatal stroke. The authors conclude:

“The side effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccination are still incompletely understood….clinicians should be aware of presentations like this one.”

Individual risks are growing with each vaccine

As we pointed out in our last article, the medical authorities really don’t know what is causing a surge in winter illness coming on top of our already overwhelmed hospital system. In an interview with Jamie Morton of the NZ Herald, Professor Plank references new so-called FLiRT variants of the JN.1 Covid strain. Rather than pressing the fear button and urging one more throw of the COVID-19 vaccine dice, Professor Plank might have drawn upon a couple of principles from Virology 101.

At this point in the pandemic, the biggest drivers of COVID variation are actually COVID-19 vaccines. The more Covid vaccines, the more Covid variants. Variants are running into uncountable millions. Among them, Covid variants that evade COVID-19 vaccines are set to flourish and spread.

Secondly, as we have referenced previously, repeated doses of Covid vaccines cause Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (VAIDS).

Thirdly, as is now admitted in the scientific literature, the more mRNA COVID-19 vaccine doses you have, the more exposed you become to serious risks, including heart disease, stroke and cancer.

We reported just days ago that prominent vaccine advocate Dr. Vinay Prasad is now suggesting that the evidence shows the risk of serious illness following mRNA Covid vaccination outweighs any potential benefit.

The gene illusion that is killing us

Possibly, Professor Plank doesn’t read the Hatchard Report. Nor does it appear that Jennifer Doudna, inventor of the CRISPR gene editing technique. Doudna is an unrepentant advocate of our individual and collective biotechnology future. In her book “A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution” Doudna says:

“Armed with the complete CRISPR toolkit, scientists can now exert nearly complete control over both the composition of the genome and its output.”

On a more sober note, Doudna continues:

“The power to control our species’ genetic future is awesome and terrifying. Deciding how to handle it may be the biggest challenge we have ever faced.”

But don’t think that means Doudna has embraced precautionary thinking, she describes belief in the safety of gene editing as the “scientific consensus” and continues “….have no doubt, this technology will — someday, somewhere — be used to change the genome of our own species in ways that are heritable, forever altering the genetic composition of human kind.”

In fact Doudna has no doubt that critics of rampant gene editing are fools, she is appalled by their ignorance. And concludes “human gene editing would almost assuredly never have the same catastrophic consequences as the detonation of a nuclear weapon”.

Doudna was writing in 2017 before the pandemic. Her assurances of safety were worthless. The millions of pandemic deaths that have scarred the world had not yet happened in 2017, but already an obscure laboratory in Wuhan was busy using Doudna’s CRISPR techniques to perform clandestine experiments to enhance coronaviruses. In effect, they were busy weaponizing a version of the highly infectious common cold. Gain of function experiments that would end up editing humanity.

The New York Post yesterday published an article entitled “Explosive emails show top NIH adviser deleted records, used ‘secret’ back channels to help Fauci evade COVID transparency“. Newly uncovered documents show those responsible, including Anthony Fauci in America conspired to cover up the truth about Wuhan and the origins of Covid. Well they might, that truth is just as explosive and devastating as nuclear detonation. As in war, millions have died as a result of CRISPR gene editing.

We have only just begun to realise how much humanity has been edited.

We have reported on the health effects of the pandemic and the Covid vaccines, but the true extent of the violent effects of the pandemic and our response to it are extraordinary and far reaching.

A lengthy article in the New York Times is entitled “How the Pandemic Reshaped American Gun Violence”. To assess the impact of the pandemic years, the New York Times created a map of every gun homicide in the United States since 2020, using data collected from the police and news media accounts by the nonprofit Gun Violence Archive.

The analysis revealed that gun deaths spread like a virus into new neighbourhoods during the pandemic: An additional 8.7 million Americans now live on a block near a gun homicide — a 23 percent increase from the pre-pandemic years.

Whilst gun violence is rife in America, we don’t have any cause for complacency here in lightly armed New Zealand. We too have suffered an unprecedented rash of violent crime and behaviour.

So can we lay some of the senseless violence and destructive behaviour at the feet of Covid vaccines? Short answer: no one knows. Suffice to say that the genetic mechanisms in our cells support not just our health but also our behaviour and crucially our consciousness.

I sat having my haircut a few days ago as the hairdresser sagely informed me that health all comes down to genes. This popular notion that we need to get our genes corrected is an illusion. That is the last thing we should be doing.

There is a fine line between truth and illusion, between empathy and hatred, discrimination and prejudice, and between humanity and the pitilessness of animal predatory behaviour. How our genes keep us on the right side of kindness is unknown. Our knowledge about the effect of gene editing on consciousness is still a blank slate. On that blank slate, like the entrance to Dante’s inferno, we should write “abandon hope all who enter here”.

Truly as Doudna said “The power to control our species’ genetic future is awesome and terrifying” but not in the sense that she meant ‘awesome’. We should rather reference the awesome shadow of Hiroshima and the Holocaust, and so should Doudna now if she has any post-pandemic common sense and wisdom of hindsight.

So there is at least one New Zealand official who is prepared to put their little finger up above the parapet. Coroner Sue Johnson has ruled that the death of Dunedin man Rory Nairn from post-vaccine myocarditis may have been prevented if he had been given more information before consenting to the Covid mRNA vaccination that later claimed his life. Her report highlights failures in informing the public of risks.

This article is available as a PDF document to download/print, or share, or you can listen to Guy here.

If you thought there might be some justice coming down the pipeline, think again. Health and Disability Commissioner Morag McDowell received a referral from the Coroner asking her to investigate. She has now issued a report. This identifies glaring failures of vaccination providers to inform consumers of the known risk of myocarditis and the urgent need to go to hospital if you had chest pains, but then concludes there is no need for disciplinary action due to the unprecedented circumstances of the worldwide pandemic.

Join with me in a deep groan of agonised incomprehension. How could this white washing happen?

Last week Stats New Zealand released the Births and Deaths update to March 2024. In summary:

Our birth rate, which was stable from 1975 to 2013, has declined 30% since that time. Last year the birth rate declined by a further 4%. Down by 2,500 births. The total fertility rate was 1.52 births per woman, down from 1.65. You need this figure to be around 2.1 to avoid population decline.

Our infant mortality has plateaued, reversing the previous decades long trend of gradual improvements.

Gratifyingly, our death rate declined compared to the previous year to 37,623 deaths, down from 38,835. However, this is still well above the pre-pandemic rate. We have calculated the rate of excess deaths allowing for population changes. Compared to the five years before the pandemic, the last five years have seen a cumulative total of 3,529 additional excess deaths.

To put this in perspective, the total is equivalent to 69 Christchurch Mosque Attacks or 18 Christchurch earthquakes. It is also 9 times higher than our current homicide rate. If you put these astronomical figures next to the refusal of the Health and Disability Commissioner and hundreds of other officials, parliamentarians, and medicos to take any disciplinary action, you can re-appraise it as an extraordinary act of looking the other way faced with a stealthy but deadly plague of serial killers in our midst.

Especially worrying is the lack of detail in the births and deaths report. The break downs are limited to age, sex and ethnicity, not by cause of death. We don’t know what these people are dying from. We know from hints that cardiac deaths and cancer deaths are up, but by how much and in what categories? Without this information you can’t craft any appropriate response to the health crisis. Hospitalisation and disability rates are admitted to be way up and out of control, but again the official stats are limited to things like emergency response times. Why this lack of detail?

We have recently reported snippets of overseas data. For example from leading UK oncologist Professor Angus Dalgleish which suggests reactivations of melanomas, lymphomas, leukaemias, colorectal, and kidney cancers. A Japanese study indicates increases in all cancer types after the third mRNA Covid booster. Dr. Frizzelle of Otago Medical School let slip in a recent interview that the rate of colorectal cancers in young NZers accelerated in 2022. How serious are these trends and how concerned should we be?

We are getting a lot of waffle from mainstream media. For example from Stuff newspaper “What illnesses are currently making Kiwis sick?” And the NZ Herald says “Why is everyone sick right now?”. These offer us a potpourri of what the Stuff health correspondent Hannah Martin refers to as ‘the usual winter culprits’—coughs, colds, flu, COVID-19, whooping cough, and RSV. Is this the extent of it? No.

If you want a reality check, try the 2023 emergency response report of Hato Hone St John ambulance service. In 2014 there were 99 ambulance call outs per 1000 people. In 2023 there were 130 ambulance callouts per 1000 people. That is an alarming 16% rise over 2019 and steady compared to 2022. These increased call outs are not for coughs and colds and they are not going away.

So why aren’t alarm bells ringing in the corridors of power, the medical establishment or the public arena here or overseas? Part of the answer was revealed by the UK Daily Telegraph last week in a piece of real investigative journalism entitled “The four-step ‘playbook’ the NHS uses to break whistleblowers“. The authors interviewed doctors who raised patient safety concerns. They recount how they were confronted with systemic bullying and harassment from managers and colleagues along with a culture of cover-up. The article covers multiple cases where:

“Law firms and private investigators are also often brought in to investigate the whistleblower, who is then told they are being suspended. Years of internal investigations, disciplinary hearings and legal battles typically follow, until medics succumb to the personal, professional and financial pressure and quit. Many doctors who have decades of expertise in their field and distinguished careers are reduced to depression and suicidal thoughts by the situation they find themselves in. Some sign non-disclosure agreements, enabling them to return to work if they promise to keep their mouths shut, others try to fight back through the High Court or employment tribunals, and others leave the NHS for private hospitals or quit the medical profession altogether.”

The evidence collected by The Telegraph suggests NHS employers are more likely to investigate the conduct of whistleblowers than the issue they have raised. Of the 52 medics interviewed by this newspaper, 41 said their own conduct was put under investigation. They were all subjected to counter-allegations after raising concerns.

One typical example involved Jasna Macanovic, a consultant hepatologist at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, who raised concerns with the Care Quality Commission about an “innovative” dialysis technique being used by her colleagues, which she said amounted to harmful experimentation. The CQC visited the trust to investigate, and within days of inspectors departing, Dr Macanovic was herself put under investigation. Ultimately Macanovic was cleared, but only after months of harassment.

Such ‘investigations’ often involve intimidating police interviews of the whistleblower. Another consultant told The Telegraph the investigative processes “give hospital management unbelievable power with no accountability. Essentially the NHS trusts investigate themselves, mark their own homework, and they become the judge, jury and executioner for the whistleblower all in one go.”

The four step process outlined and documented by the Telegraph is as follows:

Step 1: Investigate the whistleblower

Step 2: Bully and intimidate

Step 3: Weaponise General Medical Council referrals

Step 4: Demotion, disciplinary action and dismissal

The parallels with the treatment of the many conscientious New Zealand doctors struck off or suspended for advising their patients that COVID mRNA vaccines came with risks are obvious. Likewise, the Health Service whistleblower Barry Young who simply asked why so many people died after COVID-19 vaccination. He still faces court prosecution rather than any sort of internal assessment of mortality data.

The Health and Disability Commissioner should have noted that many doctors did tell their patients to beware of unquantified Covid vaccine risks. History is on their side. They have been validated by research findings and public health data. They should be acknowledged and praised, instead they remain sidelined, impoverished and discarded by the Medical Council of New Zealand who should have been reprimanded by the Commissioner.

At the root of the absolute refusal of the New Zealand medical establishment to acknowledge the failings and extent of the problems associated with mRNA vaccines is an appalling ignorance of the ABCs of the risk and safety profile of genetic interventions. We have documented some of these in our articles collected at GLOBE. It is time to speak up en masse.

This article is available as a PDF document to download/print or share.

What Sort of Future Should We Be Planning for Ourselves?

You may remember a couple of months ago that a man in the US received a kidney transplant from a genetically modified pig. This was the result of years of research and animal genetic modification carried out by multiple teams of researchers at a cost of many billions of dollars. In late March, the operation was hailed as a success and heralded by the world’s media and scientific journals as a beacon of hope for all people awaiting transplants. The prestigious scientific journal Nature announced it opened the door for an era of xenotransplanted (animal to human) organs.

This article is available as a PDF document to download/print, or share, or you can listen to Guy here.

The recipient, Richard Slayman, died suddenly a few days ago, just five weeks after being pronounced well and being discharged from hospital. His doctors at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) said on Sunday “there was no indication his death was a result of the transplant”. Please forgive my scepticism and crudity, but this reminds me of Peter Sellers as Dr. Clouseau in a lift who creates a bad smell then leaves someone standing next to him to take the fall.

To add insult to injury, following Mr Slayman’s death, Joren C. Madsen, Director of the MGH Transplant Center emphasised the significance of Mr Slayman’s contribution to medicine saying “Mr. Slayman becomes a beacon of hope for countless individuals suffering from end-stage renal disease and opens a new frontier in organ transplantation.” I suppose to say anything else like “we got it wrong” or “we are not sure what went wrong” or “this is a setback for xenotransplantation” or even “sorry, we overhyped this” might have dried up MGH’s funding.

I think you can see there is nothing routine or even conceivably financially viable about a procedure carried out on one person that absorbs billions of dollars and fails. To say that this will benefit “countless individuals” is just baseless hype. There is currently no basis to suggest that any such procedure will become viable for large numbers of individuals or more importantly no indication that it can be made to work safely for even one individual.

In another billion dollar misstep, after years of questionable research on animals, a Neuralink implant has mysteriously become detached from the first human patient’s brain. The patient, Noland Arbaugh, underwent surgery in February to attach a Neuralink chip to his brain, but the device’s functionality began to decrease within the month after his implant. Some of the device’s threads, which connect the miniature computer to the brain, had begun to retract.

According to the Guardian report, Neuralink, which Elon Musk owns and which was valued at about $5bn last year, has widely touted the success of its first implant, positioning itself as a world leader in brain-chip technology. Although the device is still in its early stages, the company’s disclosure brings more attention to the untested and complicated nature of the experimental procedure.

These are two cases of hugely costly invasive implantations carried out on single volunteers that have ended in setbacks or death. As you know, we are concerned at the Hatchard Report about another failed genetic intervention, (which increasingly looks like a genetic implantation), carried out on billions of individuals, in most cases without their informed consent and in many others against their will.

This brings me to a paper published in the journal Vaccine in April entitled “COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals” whose co-authors include or own Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris of the University of Auckland. We have commented on the worrying findings and deficiencies of this paper previously including its failure to investigate cancer incidence and other possible adverse effects, but I thought you would like to know that even ardent vaccine advocates are weighing into the debate on our side.

Vinay Prasad MD MPH is a hematologist-oncologist and Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco. He runs the VKPrasad lab at UCSF, which studies cancer drugs, health policy, clinical trials and better decision making. He is author of over 500 academic articles, and the books Ending Medical Reversal, and Malignant. He has analysed the paper on his YouTube channel and other blogs and is currently preparing an academic paper on the subject.

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Dr. Prasad comments that this paper shows a number of very concerning safety signals across a number of domains including myocarditis, ITP (immune thrombocytopenic purpura), Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s Palsy, ADEM (acute disseminated encephalomyelitis), pulmonary embolism, febrile seizures and more. More importantly he picks apart the methods used in the study and concludes that it significantly underestimates the rate of adverse effects.

Dr. Prasad goes on to describe the paper as ‘unnerving’ because it shows that the harms of the mRNA Covid vaccines clearly outweigh the benefits for many age cohorts and possibly most cohorts. On this basis he questions the wisdom and ethics of the medical authorities who mandated Covid vaccines. His short video (linked above) is well worth a view and remember this is an eminent vaccine advocate speaking out and blowing the whistle on the unthinking and unconscionable decisions of our medical tsars and physicians. You can’t sanitise this sort of behaviour, we have been lied to and now that the truth is coming out, no one wants to own up.

At the Hatchard Report, we want to maintain a commitment to positive solutions. In my book Your DNA Diet (to order go here), I outline the four areas of life that we can directly control ourselves: Experience, Behaviour, Food and Consciousness. We have referenced in other articles improved routines involving adequate exercise and rest; lighter, more nourishing natural food choices; and a routine of meditation, breathing exercises and yoga postures, but what kinds of practices can improve Experience?

There is a fundamental rule of experience: ‘what you pay attention to grows stronger in your life’ or rather ‘what you see is what you become’. The converse of this is expressed in the saying: ‘where is the time for the unwanted?’ In the field of experience we have to exercise discrimination. It is easy to fall into patterns of experience that are undesirable, especially in the internet era. There are two ways we can control this.

Firstly the most powerful path to wisdom is to follow the joy. Respect that inner voice which tells you if something is good. A walk in the morning sun by the beach is healing. A concert, a play, a get together with friends, a celebration of achievements or a milestone should not be postponed. Our choices should favour joy.

Secondly, if you know something is wrong or not useful, but you still feel compelled to participate, the technique to deal with it is to postpone. Maybe it feels too hard to decide to stop smoking altogether, but you can easily say to yourself I’ll postpone smoking for today, and then tomorrow, and so on.

I was strongly reminded this week of the need for faith, hope, and charity. Faith is a choice, hope is a necessity, and charitable actions that help create a brighter future should not be postponed.

An update from the Covid Royal Commission of Inquiry

This week my closest friend and colleague from university days passed away from cancer. It came on very suddenly, with no time to say goodbye or offer support. Although we both agreed about the lab origin of COVID-19 because of our mutual connections with the biotechnology research community, unfortunately, we differed in our attitude to the COVID-19 vaccine. My friend trusted his doctor’s advice.

This article is also available as a PDF document, to print, download or share.

The effects of gene editing cannot be contained, any mistakes can spread without limit and persist through generations. Nothing highlights this more than the very long tail of the pandemic. Highly vaccinated countries are still suffering elevated rates of excess deaths and record levels of hospitalisation years later. The BBC reported in March for example: “Sick people leaving workforce at record highs“.

When I spoke about my friend’s death to an acquaintance working for the health service, they mentioned their friend and others who had similarly passed away unexpectedly and too soon. They asked me, “Had I heard of the term sniper alley?” and explained that it is as if we are all in a narrow alleyway being shot at from a hidden location. You never know who will be hit next.

Mainstream media is full of tragic cases these days. This article in the New Zealand Herald entitled “Bowel cancer rates rising among New Zealanders under 50 years old, driving calls for even lower screening age” is typical. The article reports a study showing that rate of early-onset bowel cancer increased steadily in New Zealand between 2000 and 2020. In other words, in common with many Western countries, more people under the age of 50 are tragically diagnosed with bowel cancer. The rate had been increasing by 2.3% per year.

The study covers the twenty-year period prior to the pandemic, so why am I writing about it? One of the authors of the study, Professor Frank Frizzle, revealed to the Herald that the rate of increase has suddenly accelerated beyond the study period into 2022. He also said that little is known about what is driving the increase here and overseas. This is particularly concerning since young people are smoking less and eating less meat, previously identified risk factors for bowel cancer.

If Frizzle is looking for obvious causes of the long term pre-pandemic trend, he might investigate a recent article from the Brownstone Institute entitled “Prescription Drugs Are the Leading Cause of Death” or he might read this very recent study entitled “Exposure to pesticides and risk of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis” which found an association between insecticide and herbicide exposure and colorectal cancer.

However, neither of these possible risk factors has suddenly accelerated in 2022, so why have the rates of bowel cancer been accelerating recently in New Zealand? We don’t know because publicly available Health Service cancer data only goes to the end of 2021. In fact, we don’t know why our hospitals are overcrowded. We don’t know which specific disease rates are higher. Apparently, Professor Frizzle has more up-to-date information, but we don’t. The public is left with gossip from inside the medical profession that we are now living in sniper alley, tragic tales in mainstream media, and heart-rending personal anecdotes like mine and yours.

For the record, a study of cancer mortality in Japan was published in the journal Cureus in April entitled “Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan”. The study found that following vaccination with a third mRNA vaccine dose in 2022, researchers observed “significant excess mortalities” for all cancers.

Well, you might think, we have an ongoing public inquiry into the COVID-19 pandemic taking place here in New Zealand, surely that is going to take note of overseas research findings and answer our questions? Short answer: Not likely based on present evidence. Professor Tony Blakely, Chairman of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the Covid Response, issued a public statement on 7th May summarising progress so far with the move to revise its terms of reference. He managed all 900 words without once mentioning COVID-19 vaccine injury.

Blakely identified ‘vaccine effectiveness’ as a topic that might be included in the inquiry, but despite receiving a petition containing over 35,000 signatures expressing concern about vaccine safety, these risks are not mentioned once in his progress report. Professor Blakely seems determined to keep mum and continue to swim against the tide of concern. Despite being an epidemiologist, Prof. Blakely doesn’t mention what has been described elsewhere as the baffling association between excess mortality and Covid vaccination rates. Is he the right man for the job? You tell me.

The New Zealand Herald reprinted an article from the UK Daily Telegraph on Wednesday entitled “AstraZeneca withdraws Covid vaccine, months after admitting rare side effect“. Let’s have more honesty like this. The article preamble notes that 9087 doses of the vaccine were administered in New Zealand, with 319 recipients reporting adverse effects. In the UK, it is officially linked with at least 81 deaths. 50 injured recipients are currently engaged in a class action against the company. These figures are likely to be the tip of the iceberg.

In New Zealand the predominant vaccine has been the mRNA Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. 65,000 adverse effects have been reported to Medsafe, and Pfizer has admitted that there are side effects, including myocarditis, a form of heart disease. A prospective study in Thailand found measurable cardiovascular effects in a staggering 29% of subjects receiving the Pfizer vaccine, but this COVID-19 vaccine has not been withdrawn (review more links here). It is still being promoted here as ‘safe and effective’. New Zealand remains stuck in the COVID dark ages.