spot_imgspot_img
Home Blog Page 14

Startling Revelations Change Everything New Zealanders Have Been Schooled to Believe

0

Bombshell revelations reported this weekend by The Australian, a leading broadsheet owned by the Murdoch group, have huge implications for pandemic policy here in New Zealand. They should completely change public perceptions and understanding of the Covid landscape. These implications include legal liability, safety of public health measures, future pandemic responses, and personal health choices.

This article is available as a PDF document to print/download or share.

The Weekend Australian leads with an investigative article entitled‘Covid Cover-Up: How Science was Silenced’covering a chilling admission of guilt from Robert Kadlec—former Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Health at the US Department of Health. Kadlec told The Australian that he, Dr. Fauci, and National Institute of Health Director Francis Collins privately discussed how to turn down the heat on China in the early days of the pandemic by playing down concerns about a lab leak from Wuhan.

Kadlec said, 

“I think Tony Fauci was trying to protect his institution and his own reputation from the possibility that his agency was funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers who, beyond the scope of the grants received from the National Institutes of Health, may have been working with People’s Liberation Army researchers on defensive coronavirus vaccines.”

‘Defensive coronavirus vaccine research’ is a euphemism for military-funded gain of function research to mutate deadly pathogens in order to explore the creation of vaccines for use in the event of a bio-war.

Kadlec admitted, “We think vaccine research resulted in the pandemic—that vaccine research was the proximate cause.”

As a result, Kadlec said, 

“we decided to encourage a group of leading international scientists to calm down speculation on the origin of the virus.”

>>> Support the Hatchard Report with a small donation <<<

The front page Australian article dated 29th July 2023 and three other articles on subsequent pages of the same edition, all covering the explosive admissions, are hidden behind an expensive online paywall shared with the WSJ, but you can view a photo of the newspaper here and examine more detailed evidence here.

It comes on top of leaked private communications showing that leading scientists, very publicly debunking the lab leak theory, in actuality believed it was almost certainly correct. At the time, my own communications with top scientists working in the gene therapy field showed that it was widely understood that the genetic structures associated with the Covid spike protein were man made, yet saying so could lose you your job.

If you are new to this kind of discussion, you are probably asking why haven’t we seen articles like these here in New Zealand? The answer is revealed by a reporter from ABC News, talking with colleagues from the Sydney Morning Herald and the Australian which was inadvertently caught on a hot mic. One describes it as ‘annoying and amazing’ that the lab leak theory now looks to be correct. The journalists admit that they never looked at the lab leak theory dispassionately, but relied on their ideological rejection of those asking questions. In other words, there was no credible investigation of the facts by mainstream media.

The Implications for New Zealand of the Latest Covid Revelations

For three years, we have been divided as a nation along the lines of vaccinated versus unvaccinated. It is now abundantly clear that both Covid and Covid vaccines originated from risky biotechnology research on mutated deadly pathogens.

Rather than a divided nation, we could have been a united nation, standing shoulder to shoulder against novel biotechnology experimentation.

There is a need to spell out the technical implications of this. The engineered spike protein has features which are completely foreign to our immune system. At the start of the pandemic, our physiology had no evolutionary context or memory of fighting off these novel genetic sequences. It is now apparent that the spike protein has a toxic profile, especially for the heart and circulatory system. Thus Covid infection had both short and long term unquantified implications for health. The various Covid vaccines were designed to teach our cells to produce Covid spike proteins in quantity, therefore the vaccines inevitably also had significant short and long term implications for health dictated by their pathogenic design.

If we had known that Covid was an engineered pathogen, we would have recognised that concerns about Covid vaccine safety were legitimate.

New Zealand was misled by the US administration. The lesson here is very clear. New Zealand must be more circumspect to scrutinise the health information supplied to our nation from nations and institutions who are clearly tied to commercial endeavours seeking to profit from actions and policy decisions resulting from this information. This includes information received from the WHO, ICMRA, FDA, CDC, WEF, and possibly through Five Eyes. It is now clear that some information we received during the pandemic from these sources was unreliable. False and/or misleading information was received at multiple levels of government, including Medsafe, the PM’s office, and probably our intelligence organisations. Yet New Zealand adopted a trusting perspective and vigorously acted upon it, possibly more stringently than other nations. The result has not just been policy missteps, but high rates of vaccine injuryexcess deaths, economic hardship, and lasting social division.

There is no doubt that PM Jacinda Ardern curated misplaced trust in foreign official sources. We now know these sources were editing scientific dialogue and results to suit commercial and geopolitical agendas.

In a gross error of judgement, Ardern’s department created a policy of exclusion aimed at those questioning the severity of Covid, the lab leak hypothesis, and Covid vaccine safety. This legitimised actions at every level of government and the judiciary to cancel those raising concerns. The Ardern government, with the approval of opposition parties, framed this as a moral crusade and pursued agreements with social media companies to exclude legitimate science and debate. In actuality, we were being played by foreign interests. Our sovereign independence was being undermined to an extent it never has been before. We were losing our right to choose as a nation, and thereby our right to choose as individuals. This illustrates the inherent bankruptcy of the globalist outlook as opposed to our traditional New Zealand outlook of self-determination. It highlights the need for extreme caution in a world of globalised information and media dilution of science.

How Serious Are the Potential Dangers?

In a globalised world, we have to be very circumspect of foreign interests, which certainly do not coincide with those of New Zealand. Consider this article—New evidence of Beijing’s Covid cover-up and possible Wuhan lab leak revealed: China’s public health authorities cracked virus’ genetic code five DAYS before the world knew about the disease, scientist claims. China, like the US, was not sharing information, rather they were sharing disinformation, and they are likely to do so again in the future.

The freewheeling attitude to biotech risk management was underlined this week by a horrifying article entitled “Unassuming warehouse in California turns out to be illegal Chinese-run virus laboratory that was genetically engineering mice and experimenting with HIV, herpes and malaria“. The safety rules governing biotechnology experimentation are simply inadequate for the task. Risky experimentation involving deadly pathogens at poorly secured locations are proliferating around the world. Worse, many are being funded by governments and legally sanctioned. The entire gene editing enterprise, whether safely contained or not, is fraught with unacceptable levels of risk and rife with accidents. Much publicity generated by commercial biotech interests is aimed at persuading the public that these serious risks are non-existent.

On top of this, we have to consider that politicians have little ability to reliably sort the significance of varying evidence when considering any complex scientific advice they receive. Consider this paper published in the Annals of Internal Medicine entitled “The Effect of Influenza Vaccination for the Elderly on Hospitalization and Mortality”, which studied 170 million episodes of influenza care and 7.6 million deaths among those over 64. It concluded back in April 2020:

“No evidence indicated that flu vaccination reduced hospitalisations or mortality among elderly persons. The estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.”

Do we hear about this when being urged to take our flu shots? No. The media and the government have long since stopped caring about the exaggerations and profiteering of the pharmaceutical industry.

Across the board, the globalist agenda and the associated information network is driven by ideological priorities remote from our national interests.

Listen, for example, to John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, implying that agricultural production has to be curtailed to contain global warming. It doesn’t seem to bother John Kerry that he frequently travels by private jet. Nor does he seem to appreciate that modern civilization relies on agriculture which started in the Indus Valley 10,000 years ago. By a rambling circuitous route that lacks continuity of thought, Kerry arrives at the idea that because the world’s population is increasing we should reduce the global food supply, an argument worthy of concentration camp systems designed to work people to death. What does that mean for agricultural producers like New Zealand? This is being used to target New Zealand farmers. Our local supermarkets have swallowed the bait, hook, line, and sinker (see here). Remember, the US sees NZ as an agricultural competitor to be controlled rather than assisted. We need to become alert and look out for our own interests.

In the wake of this weekend’s revelations we must appreciate that there are outstanding questions of legal liability.

We have covered some of these in our previous articles:

  • Were we sufficiently warned by Pfizer of the results of trials and post-marketing data indicating very high levels of vaccine adverse effects across a range of conditions? Apparently not.
  • Did our government decide to ignore concerning and unprecedented levels of domestic adverse effects of Covid vaccines because the US and UK authorities were spreading propaganda designed to dampen concerns around biotechnology in order to protect their commercial domination in the field of vaccine research, development and marketing? It appears so.
  • As a result, did the New Zealand Government, our health service, and the Accident Compensation Commission unfairly deny the existence of Covid vaccine injuries, dismiss patients without investigation or testing and withhold compensation? Yes, they did.
  • Did our courts trust government sources without requiring cross examination of government witnesses, and thereby disadvantage appellants? Yes, repeatedly.
  • Is the NZ government still funding a disinformation project driven by ideology aimed at cancelling anyone asking questions about Covid origins, vaccine safety and pandemic policy? Yes, vigorously.

Unfortunately, none of these concerns are within the scope of the New Zealand All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry which no doubt needs to be urgently widened (Summary of ToR for Royal Commission into COVID and any future pandemic.pdf).

In particular, the government seems to be unaware of the pitfalls of concluding an agreement which cedes our health sovereignty to the World Health Organisation (WHO). People working in distant offices in Geneva, Switzerland, heavily influenced by the global pharmaceutical industry, are unlikely to fully appreciate the concerns of independent scientists and the unique interests of New Zealand and the health of its citizens. On past and present evidence, they are more than likely to work against our interests.

For example, a study published by the prestigious BMJ on 26 February 2020 entitled WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards” details WHO’s disregard for the adverse effects of an experimental malaria vaccine called Mosquirix in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The trial was projected to involve 720,000 children, yet previous clinical trials found a rate of meningitis in those receiving Mosquirix 10 times that of those who did not, increased cerebral malaria cases, and a doubling in the risk of death (from any cause) in girls. The article bemoans the complete lack of informed consent concerning these serious risks offered to the unsuspecting African child participants and their parents. This is vile. Sound familiar? The WHO 2030 Agenda expects that we will all receive hundreds of novel vaccines over the next ten years, but WHO can’t even manage a single vaccine without violating accepted ethical safeguards. Our government wishes to hand over control of our medical system to these people. Why?

In conclusion, the New Zealand government, the media, the health service, and the judiciary have failed to seriously consider safety questions that have been repeatedly raised despite them being backed by published data and studies. Precaution has been thrown to the winds. The public has been left in the dark because of ideological prejudice and an ill-conceived reliance on foreign authority, alien to our history of self-sufficiency and cultural integrity. This represents a collective failure of our national systems of governance, science, education, information, health and justice. We are waiting to hear words of caution from those among the major parties standing for election in October. Proceeding with our election without anyone in authority admitting and correcting these mistakes will initiate a nightmare journey to further national chaos.

If It Walks Like a Duck and Quacks Like a Duck, It is a Duck

The UK Daily Mail leads today with a story about the heart attack suffered by Bronny James on the basketball court. According to two UK doctors described as leading experts and cited by the Mail, the suggestion that this might be the result of a vaccine injury is a conspiracy theory.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

The article concedes that deaths from heart disease are at record levels and also concedes that Covid vaccines cause heart damage, but stiffly maintains that those conflating these two facts are not only in error but are also engaged in a conspiracy to pervert truth and presumably justice. The BBC also chimes in with an article claiming piously, “there is no evidence to support the implication vaccines might be involved”.

At the ‘heart’ of these claims is the suggestion that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare, so rare that it could not possibly be causing the huge rate of excess deaths from heart disease which amounts, according to the British Heart Foundation, to a massive 30,000 extra UK deaths per year when compared to pre-pandemic levels.

At the same time as Bronny James was suffering a tragic heart attack and its aftermath, Swiss scientists finalised a scientific paper for publication entitled “Sex specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination”. This is a landmark study because it is a gold standard, carefully-planned, prospective study with a rigorous schedule of tests rather than an incomplete retrospective assessment of past events.

777 health care workers were tested for myocardial damage three days after booster vaccination and compared to the same number of controls. 40 of them (1 in 20) had elevated troponin levels indicative of damage to cardiac cells. These people (65% of them women) were subject to follow up tests and 22 of them (1 in 35) were judged to have vaccine-induced myocardial injury. This careful study proves that myocardial injury has been massively underreported. The Mail reports that the UK Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had previously estimated a rate of just 1 in 666. Now known to be wrong by a factor of 20.

By no stretch of the imagination can myocardial injury be judged to be ‘extremely rare’ as the Mail suggests. Nor, according to this detailed discussion by Dr. John Campbell is this level of risk something any of us would consider taking on unless we faced imminent death as an alternative, which we don’t. For another discussion see this informative substack article.

Fortunately, the short term effects among those tested in the Swiss study did not include severe outcomes, but another prospective study completed in 2022 in Thailand on 314 high school students did find such severe effects. It is well known that myocarditis has both short term and long term outcomes. The elevated rate of excess deaths from heart disease in the general population does point to the need to ask questions. Asking them publicly does not amount to a conspiracy. The dismissal of these claims suggests there is an attempt to cover up on the part of the same doctors who coerced us to take the jabs and told us they were effective and safe (they aren’t).

Other causal factors for the steep rise in excess deaths from heart disease suggested by the Mail include the rise in ambulance response times to cardiac incidents from 30 to 90 minutes. It is surely not too hard for the newspaper to realise that if there are more cardiac events there will be longer response times, not the other way around. Another suggestion widely touted until recently was a supposed failure to prescribe statins during the pandemic, this disappeared from newsprint pages when it was realised that statin prescriptions have actually not decreased.

If you want to know just how convoluted denial of responsibility can become, read a translation of an article from Sweden where a 30 year old man died after receiving a booster jab. The government paid his family financial compensation but listed the event as the result of a medicine given in error rather than suffer the embarrassment of calling it a vaccine related death. A paper analysing autopsy results following Covid vaccination underlines the intended obfuscation of this kind of doublespeak.

Behind this posturing and denial of responsibility lies something much darker with more chilling implications for public health. It is not just heart attacks that are up to levels never seen before. Ditto for cancers, kidney injury, neurological injury, strokes, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, stillbirths, cognitive decline and crucially unexplained deaths.

These statistics point to the need for probing questions of a different type. Are the vaccines or indeed Covid infection, which the balance of evidence now suggests both came from a biotech lab, causing generalised immune instability and more worryingly, how long is this going to go on, and how bad will it get?

Sometimes you find that you have to face up to extreme challenges in your personal life. Our responses to these crises define who we are and what we can become. This can require admitting to ourselves and others that we got it all wrong. Apology and humility build character and support honesty.

Crises can also engulf the whole of society. The casual dismissal of questions about vaccine safety shows we have arrived at just such a societal crisis. A crisis of health and truth whose dimensions appear to dwarf anything civilisation as a whole has had to face in our lifetimes. The beginnings of this crisis are no doubt lost in history, but the turning point came when some decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry at the start of the pandemic decided it would be safe to unleash biotechnology on the general public. We are just at the beginning of this era. The WHO 2030 Agenda predicts that we will all be subject to hundreds of novel vaccines within the decade.

Biotechnology medicine was well known to be unsafe and inherently mutagenic pre-pandemic. Crucially it wasn’t so much what we knew, but what we didn’t know that constituted the colossal error of judgement, hubris, cruelty and greed. A single cell, the origin of life, contains an uncountable 100 trillion atoms organised into 42 million protein molecules and twenty thousand genes. Scientists have only a vague picture of how cells work. They have no idea how cells produce consciousness, how cells join together (37.2 trillion of them) to form a single human identity with amazing autonomic functions and immunity.

What we thought they knew can only be described as a crude notion put together from a few isolated facts derived from a countable number of experiments. Scientists don’t understand how intra-cellular transport and selection is managed. They only have a hazy comprehension of the role of electric fields, molecular shape, vibrational modes, so-called dark areas of our genome and multi-gene cooperative functions.

What we do know for certain is the immense precision involved and the vulnerability to even very small edits to their structure. Cells work very hard to protect this precision, each one completes over 70,000 self-repairs every day. With this in mind, it becomes very apparent that those working in the field of gene therapy knew from previous failures and disasters just how potentially dangerous Covid vaccines could be. Some did warn their superiors, who not only ignored them but set about telling the general public that that biotechnology was completely safe and near 100% infallible. This was a big lie, not to say the crime of the century.

As you no doubt know very well, once you have told one lie, it is very hard to avoid telling more lies which can eventually become a world of untruth that eats away at your conscience and peace. This has become the fate of society during the pandemic. No one is participating more enthusiastically than the fourth estate. Everyday, newspapers print articles claiming that excess deaths, which are running into millions world wide, are normal or non-existent and have nothing to do with the obvious culprit. Governments are looking the other way and piously washing their hands of the matter like Pontius Pilate, while medical authorities are busying themselves hiding the data and refusing to carry out tests and autopsies.

The new generation of biotech medicines are squarely aimed at editing the internal operation of cells, the control system that keeps our physiology and our life flying safely along. It shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that handicapping the pilot might crash the plane. The only surprise is that millions of crashed planes world wide are being ignored. We are living in a very different world from the one we thought we inhabited. I hope we are not so daft that we stop asking questions on the advice of those manifestly profiting from the pandemic.

After reporting earlier that there have been 100,000 extra UK deaths from heart disease alone, the Mail concludes by claiming without evidence that the number of vaccine-related deaths pales in comparison to the estimated 230,000 deaths that Covid inoculation has supposedly saved (???)—a figure widely disputed and believed to be wildly inflated. Even so 2 to 5 are not odds that I would accept if I had to put my life up as collateral, would you?

Articles like those today in the Daily Mail and the BBC, and there are many of them published everyday, are not just bad journalism, they are part of an insidious push to promote drugs that are known to harm people. They are intended to quiet the concern of people worldwide who are waking up to their tragic side effects and complete ineffectiveness. The purpose is manifestly the inflation of the profits of a trillion dollar industry who has proved itself callous and criminal, unfit to dominate public health policy as they do through revolving doors between regulators and industry insiders and through obscene advertising expenditure and gifts to medical professionals.

Image Credits

Photo by Chris on Unsplash

A Turning Point in Our Nation: The Sentencing of Billy Tk Jnr. And Vinny Eastwood to Jail

0

Yesterday I was interviewed on a US radio channel jointly with Billy Te Kahika Jnr. and Vinny Eastwood. I realised I have been remiss. I have not publicly discussed their case here in New Zealand, whose outcome will materially affect our future rights and treatment under the law. I want to rectify that now.

Mr. Te Kahika, a pastor and former serving soldier and policeman, and Mr Eastwood, a social commentator and radio personality, have been sentenced to four months and three months jail time, respectively, for participating in a peaceful, non-violent protest against level 4 lockdowns. Their case comes up for appeal against sentencing on the morning of Monday, 31st July. They have both been subject to persistent unfavourable comment in mainstream media, unreasonably impugning their character and intentions.

It is very hard not to think that they may have both been sentenced to jail in order to make an example of them and send a message to the whole nation. If this was the case, it would have been the hallmark of a repressive regime.

The wheels of justice turn slowly for a reason, it enables the judicial system to place offences in the context of subsequent events. It has been two years since the apparent offence. Since that time, it has become known that lockdowns damaged our economy and disadvantaged the education of youth. They signalled the beginning of an era of high youth crime rates, too high, in fact, for the police and courts to contain or mitigate.

It is also apparent that lockdowns and other pandemic policies ultimately proved ineffective at reducing the level of casualties and deaths. For example, this article discusses that both Sweden, who didn’t lock down, and Israel, who did had similar long term health outcomes.

Mr. Te Kahika and Eastwood are appealing their sentence. They note that no other persons have been handed jail time for offences of this type committed in New Zealand. In contrast to their treatment, a great many people participating in protests during the pandemic have been arrested and released without charge, conviction, or punishment. This was just.

There are very important points of law at stake here that affect our rights as New Zealanders.

The law is supposed to be fair. Laws should be applied equally, without prejudice or inequality. In the English legal system, from which our laws are originally derived, the role of the judiciary was considered to include the defence of fairness. In the early 1970s I heard Lord Justice Denning, Master of the Rolls, enunciate this concept at Birkbeck College in London. His words made a great impression on me. He said the judicial system:

 “should uphold what right-thinking men know to be fair between man and man, and in these days between man and the state.”

He emphasised the need for the courts to think rightly and fairly in passing judgement. He thought the judiciary should play a role in curbing any excesses of the State. He recognised that a government, even though it is democratically elected at some point in time, must not lose sight of the rights of its individual members. If it did, it is right and proper for the courts to issue judgements reflecting a fair application of universal principles of justice.

In New Zealand, we have a principle of the supremacy of Parliament to make laws, but we also have a Bill of Rights. Provisions 13 to 18 of the Bill of Rights grant freedom of thought, conscience and religion. They also grant freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, association, and movement. Provision 6 states:

“Wherever an enactment can be given a meaning that is consistent with the rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights, that meaning shall be preferred to any other meaning.”

The concepts of law and government in ancient Greece were thought to be derived from natural laws. In this philosophy of justice, natural laws, such as the laws of physics etc. were seen to be equally applied to all but also applied in such a way that everyone was nourished by them. In the affairs of state, it is the role of leaders to balance the social interest and the individual interest. Democracy is supposed to offer an opportunity for all to contribute and participate, it is not and never has been understood as a system of repressive control.

In retrospect, the measures taken during the pandemic, including lockdowns, may have been well intentioned, but their net outcomes were extremely unbalanced. A fact that was admitted by the Prime Minister at the time, who spoke of the intention to create a two-tiered society. It is even more clear now that this was a mistake, it was divisive, ultimately ineffective, and damaging. From this point of view, with the wisdom of hindsight, Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika can be legitimately understood to be justly seeking to protect the integrity of our nation rather than undermining it. They sought to support our democratic society.

Last week we witnessed with horror the murder of individuals and the shooting of policemen in central Auckland. We now know that the perpetrator was under home detention for very violent offences committed against his whanau. During this detention, he was also allowed the freedom to attend work. Contrast this with the current jail sentences against Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika for minor actions that do not involve any violence.

We also heard that our Justice Minister Kiri Allan had been arrested for drunk driving and failing to follow the instructions of a police officer after an accident. She fled the scene of the accident. This provokes us to recognise that the elected government can be fallible. When it is, it is the role of the courts to inject balance into the public debate.

I sincerely hope that Monday’s hearing of appeal finds in favour of the applicants. I believe justice served in this case could be a turning point in our nation and a way of healing the divisions that have grown up during the turbulent and uncertain years of the pandemic. I believe that an appropriate decision by the court on Monday could go some way towards restoring the effect of the provisions of our Bill of Rights, which were bypassed to a considerable, and I believe unreasonable extent during the pandemic.

It is a great misfortune of the forthcoming election that none of our currently elected political parties have talked about the need to entrench the Bill of Rights as a constitutional principle. Doing so would ensure balance between the rights of the individual and the power of the State. It would protect the people from ill-considered overreach by the government.

I am asking for people to voice their support for Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika. It is surprising how little the media has published the concerns we raise here, rather choosing to denigrate the defendants, despite the fact that the judgements, in this case, affect everyone’s rights in NewZealand for the future. They are both family men of hitherto good behaviour who would suffer greatly if jailed. The emotional and material cost of their defence has been substantial. In particular, Mr. Te Kahika has personally spent $97,000 on legal costs so far (an amount beyond his modest means) and needs more financial support to continue his defence and pay outstanding bills. I believe that support for the defendants is in every New Zealander’s interest. To make arrangements to contact and support the defendants:

Email of Billy Te Kahika Jnr. <billy@ibc.net.nz>

A/c Mr W Te Kahika Bank account: 02 – 1245 – 0777955 – 001

Email of Vincent Eastwood <guerillamrnews@gmail.com>

https://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/donate.html

They are ready to provide verification of their costs and expenses.

You can view a documentary about their arrest here and sign a petition here

Something is Happening, But What? RNZ Wants Us to Fantasize About It

On Saturday, the UK Daily Express headlined a story, “Experts call for urgent investigation as excess deaths spark ‘dangerous’ theories“. UK excess deaths in 2023 have risen to levels commensurate with 2020 alpha variant deaths during the height of the pandemic, but the article admits that the 2023 excess is not due to Covid. Most concerning is the death toll in the 15-44 age group, which exceeds 2020 and prior years. An age group which was mostly just mildly affected by Covid.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

As they are here in New Zealand, where our rates of excess death are measurably higher than in the UK, the Government is keeping quiet and looking the other way. Dr. Charles Levinson, Medical Director of private GP service Doctorcall, said the “silence” from the Government was allowing conspiracy theories to flourish, including from anti-vaxxers, and added:

A refusal to openly discuss these statistics is an abdication of responsibility from parts of the scientific community [and the government], leading to an irreversible erosion of trust by parts of society.” We agree.

Why Aren’t Governments Investigating?

So we are not conspiracy theorists when we warn that excess deaths are up, mainstream scientists agree with us, but understandably they don’t want the jabs they administered and pushed on people to be revealed as the cause or even openly discussed. That could be very embarrassing.

Why aren’t governments investigating? It might be a fair guess at this point to suggest that governments are actually aware of excess deaths and very afraid to investigate because what limited data they have released suggests very clearly that those asking questions about vaccine safety might very well be right about the cause.

Excess deaths appear to be clustered around a range of cardiac events scientifically proven and acknowledged to be related to mRNA vaccines and cancers suspected to be. The Boston Globe, for example, headlines, “Rise in cancer among younger people worries and puzzles doctors“. Indian doctor Feruzi Mehta from Mumbai tweets that heart attack deaths among younger people now make up 15-20% of the total, when it was just 1-2% ten years ago.

Doctors like Mehta speaking up are risking de-registration. Therefore most others, faced by rising incidence of illness and death, especially among the young, are remaining silent. However, some diehards are doubling down or even succumbing to the irrational.

Silence is one thing, but our Prime Minister’s office is actively funding a disinformation project dedicated to discrediting anyone who asks questions about vaccine safety, labelling them violent extremists, paedophiles, satanists, anti-semites, animal torturers, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and anti-transgender. Saying that “all these interests ultimately merge into one”, beginning with a concern about vaccine mandates (???)

Time to Press the Pause Button

All the wild and incredible accusations listed in the preceding paragraph are explicitly made during the first 12 minutes of the first episode of a seven-part podcast series produced by RNZ called Undercurrent, in which they interview government-funded disinformation experts (???). 12 minutes of this half-baked smear campaign was enough exposure for me to press the pause button.

The problem with the RNZ podcast so far (aside from its lengthy episodes and unrelenting madness) is that it doesn’t actually discuss vaccine injuries or unprecedented rates of excess deaths (or even mention that there are such things). RNZ began putting the podcast series together more than 10 months ago. Since that time, it has become apparent that worrying excess death rates have persisted, but RNZ has apparently decided to avoid mentioning the problem. There is a possible reason for this. Once you get into inventing causes of excess deaths, you really do begin to sound very mad indeed.

Talking of Madness…

One News tweeted tonight that people in Mount Maunganui are dying of air pollution in large numbers, along with a picture of its pristine coastline.

The NY Times suggests that extreme heat is causing hundreds of extra deaths. It advises July 20, 2023 “….plan to stay indoors as much as possible with the windows closed. If you must be outdoors, consider wearing an N95 mask…” A lot of people appear to be taking this advice very seriously, one tweets despairingly:

“….I have Covid now. I haven’t been anywhere in a month. We both mask indoors and we don’t even share a bedroom or eat in the same room. No choice but to share a bathroom.”

In 2017 the NY Times wrote in praise of sunshine, saying it has massive benefits, crowing, “let the sun shine in”. Recently in 2023, the NY Times wrote, “How to Get Absolutely No Sun This Summer. None! Don’t even think about it!“.

Alex Berenson, award winning former NYT journalist, responds to this kind of reporting with “The New York Times has lost its mind. And by mind, I mean principles and understanding of the First Amendment (the right to free speech).” In which he says the NYT has walked into the government censorship trap, cancelling those voicing concerns, including himself.

A quick survey of other suggested causes of record excess deaths suggested by mainstream media ranges from the just possible marginal effect of lockdowns to the implausible alcohol consumption, loneliness, too much exercise, gardening, vacations, climate change, and the really far out: ‘there is too much air’. You can feel the panic setting in, can’t you? Something terrible is happening, but people are very afraid to face up to it.

Pro-vaccine advocate Prof. Peter Hotez is also recommending staying at home. He is warning against going to see the blockbuster Barbie or Oppenheimer movies at the cinema because you might bring Covid home with you. Incredibly he also joins with RNZ in thinking that concern about vaccine safety is a form of anti-semitism.

The Lack of Any Plausible Explanation

It doesn’t take much thought to realise that the underlying concern here is the increasingly noticeable high rate of excess deaths and the lack of any plausible explanation. All this is happening after mass vaccinations with a novel biotechnology drug. How long are we going to go on without acknowledging the elephant in the corner of the room or, more especially, tabulating how many among those dying are vaccinated or unvaccinated?

The government-backed RNZ podcast is an act of desperation which is transparently biased and illogical, aimed at a demographic that has been systematically schooled over the last three years to unquestioning dream-like acceptance of the government and the medical establishment. This might be very comforting to some who are just blindly hoping it will all go away or else feeling grateful there is a scapegoat they can blame and revile, but this narrative no longer makes any sense, if it ever did. The RNZ podcast should be dismissed as absurd propaganda issued during the last days of a failed parliament.

Just remember the paragraph with which we started this article.

Scientists are now warning us that excess deaths are real and very concerning, not imaginary as our politicians and some uninformed medicos and media hacks are still pressing us to accept, against the evidence.

We are facing a real life emergency. Our EDs and hospitals are overwhelmed. Young people are dying of conditions that used to mainly affect the elderly, but the media, the government, and the medical establishment want the subject to remain taboo. They are funding efforts to marginalise those asking questions, shooting the messenger rather than acknowledging the problem and searching for solutions. Time to wake up from the fantasy.

While You Were Sleeping….

Under urgency, the government has passed the Therapeutic Products Bill while we were distracted by the world cup and the violent events in Auckland. Why?

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

The bill mandates that all products claiming to benefit your health will have to be approved by government-appointed regulators. The same regulators who rubber stamped disastrous pandemic policies. Despite presenting no evidence that natural products are dangerous to health, Labour and the Greens have pressed ahead to gain total control over our health choices in an extraordinary extension of their power over our daily lives (read what the natural health products industry says about it here and weep).

It would be an understatement to say my family is disappointed and disgusted about this. Considering how many health benefits we have enjoyed over the years from natural products, many of which we grow in our own garden, our comments around the breakfast table this morning are unprintable. It led us to reflect on the processes that are guiding us to an almost unimaginable future.

Fear has become a weapon that is being used to manipulate us. Whether it is fear of climate change, fear of disease and death, fear of war, fear of poverty, or even fear of speaking freely, they are being deceptively used to change our habits for the worst in every sphere of our lives. Yet the outcomes most desired by those leading the way do not appear to be solutions but profit and power.

Fear is the Mindkiller

As Frank Herbert said, ‘fear is the mindkiller’. A whisper of some new disease and you must buy a new drug, whether proven useful or proven dangerous, or simply unproven. Stoking fear is enough to ensure compliant acceptance. Ditto for new foods, fads, cars, weapons, and you name it.

Now firmly in the hands of government regulators, our future is destined to be shrouded in pharmacology. We are already surrounded by government approved vape shops promoting harmful chemicals being used by all and sundry, including primary kids, oblivious to the addictive and devastating consequences.

Meanwhile, government regulators are proposing restrictive regulation of cinnamon, vitamin C, B12, and hundreds of other natural products and herbs known to be not just beneficial but essential for health.

As our politicians pretend they are inclusive and we are not, their actions are undermining our centuries old cultural heritage of herbal lore, Mātauranga Māori, traditional Chinese and Indian medicine. More than fifty percent of us use natural health products. Now they are denying us a right to choose freely. How dare Parliament bid to stop us!!

The provisions of the Therapeutic Products Bill are part and parcel of a process known as global harmonisation. In a highly regulated world, when we are all subject to the same stringent rules, only those mega corporations with a global reach will be well placed to profit with their mass produced unhealthy chemical and biotech alternatives. The mega corporations are the ones making the rules to suit themselves and fear is their weapon of choice.

Dr. Josef Mengele working in Auschwitz selected over 1000 twins for his sadistic and deadly experiments. The reason we know so much about Mengele’s crimes is that he was intensely interested in the results of his experiments which he documented in detail. I am not interested in drawing a parallel here between anything Dr Mengele did and what is happening now, but rather to highlight the obvious differences.

In our globalised world, whatever experiments are being designed in hidden laboratories are not affecting thousands but billions of individuals. The true horror of our present circumstances is revealed when we realise that the experimenters are not interested in documenting the outcomes, but merely harvesting the profit and the power. Meaning the true extent of their crimes will never be known.

We and many others have repeatedly requested the government and the medical authorities to document and publish the outcomes of pandemic policies and interventions, but instead, they are assiduously ignoring or hiding the data. See here or watch here. The evidence is overwhelming and its omission from public debate is criminal.

However, there is one respect in which the two circumstances, 80 years apart, seem strikingly similar. After the war, Dr. Mengele escaped and was never brought to justice. After the pandemic, the chief perpetrators have escaped accountability, they are being lauded as heroes. The reason this is happening is the total control that powerful interests in government, the media, and big pharma are able to wield over public narratives.

We are going to the polls this year. Reflect that democracy, which is supposed to mean participation of all the people, has come to mean control of all the people. There is no need for governments to control what we eat or what we do to further our health. If we continue to sleep through successive legislative initiatives to bind us in chains, the horrific outcomes of global experimentation will never be controlled and cleaned up.

Provisions in the Therapeutic Products Bill are designed to facilitate novel medicine, not protect the public. These provisions have been carefully crafted with the input of global commercial interests so that traditional means to maintain health that work through nutritional supplementation using natural materials will be hobbled or banned by regulation. This is designed to open the door to domination by mass-produced experimental biotechnology including novel foods.

Whatever is happening now is unsustainable, harmful, and unintelligent, if we continue to sleep through it, a time will come when we may never be able to wake up. Make no mistake about it, biotechnology experimentation is the ultimate destructive weapon that affects everyone without discrimination and can never be recalled.

Your ability to access natural health products is at risk.

Contact your MP to express your outrage. Demand that the Therapeutic Products Bill be repealed.

Members of Parliament contact details.

To read more about the global effects of regulation of natural health products read my book Your DNA Diet or view our YouTube video An Open Message To Parliament. Why Are They Regulating Natural Health Products?

Open Letter To Dr. Shane Reti, National Party Spokesperson on Health

0

Dear Dr. Reti

I would like to commend your efforts over the last three months to accompany ambulance staff up and down the country as they work to bring patients into ED at all times of the day and night. Your diligence exemplifies the need for more MPs to understand problems firsthand and talk to those on the frontline.

I note your comment reported by the Herald “I have never seen an ED that busy”. As a result, you say you are committed to providing needed tools and resources to first responders and ED staff, something we all wholeheartedly support.

The NZ Herald today reports your challenge to the sitting Health Minister, the Hon. Dr. Ayesha Verrall, regarding the release of ED data, including waiting times. Dr. Verrall has had to apologise to Parliament for incorrectly stating her department had not delayed the release of some of this data.

Your comments and actions suggest you have become more aware during the last few months of the extent of the health crisis facing the nation. I regularly receive reports from correspondents around New Zealand, many of whom work in the health services, of the increased volumes of illness in many categories particularly including cardiac illness and cancers.

It is clear from some Wellington Region health data leaked to myself that the volume of cases in many categories of illness has increased markedly and remains high (including an 83% increase in cardiac admissions). These increases appear to be both large and unprecedented. There will be a number of factors contributing to these rises possibly due in part, as you have suggested, to under-resourcing and delays associated with the peak in pandemic cases. However, the volumes we are continuing to experience appear to far exceed the impact of these factors.

It seems to me that ED data is not the only area of concern that the health services have delayed releasing to ministers and the public. Information about volumes and outcomes of specific categories of illness have also been delayed. As a doctor, I am sure you will agree that information of this type is critical when designing response and resourcing strategies. I note this recent Herald article, “‘Very disturbing’ wait times of up to 18 months for cardiac scans” for example.

As a researcher, I am fully aware of the need to study the detailed specifics of the health crisis in order to identify the causal factors. Two days ago, I wrote urging the government to:

“…record vax status on death certificates and compare the death rate of the unvaccinated to the vaccinated. Governments and medical authorities have done the opposite, they have failed to publish this data. Now why would they do that? By hiding information, are they protecting democracy or undermining it? Are they using or misusing science? Are they serving the public or deceiving them?”

I am perplexed as to why the government is continuing to heavily promote Covid vaccination, when specific evidence of its outcomes is being delayed or hidden.

I am writing to you to ask if you can formally request detailed information of this type? If, as you have often suggested, the Covid vaccines have been largely safe, this data will lend support to your views. If the opposite is the case, there are important lessons to learn which directly affect the health of individuals. In either case, it is extremely important that accurate and complete data informs government policy and medical advice.

As you are no doubt aware, there is a continuing controversy about the rate of excess deaths and hospitalisations. I am disturbed that this subject has become a political football, with much uninformed and prejudicial comment. The analysis is not being approached scientifically. Your trips with first responders and visits to EDs have no doubt raised some doubts about the authenticity of some media and public commentary.

I am greatly in favour of informed public comment. Your recent ED visits and questions in parliament have served the public interest. As I live in the Whangarei locality, I would welcome an opportunity to personally discuss my concerns about these matters with you. Otherwise, can your probing questions in parliament and public comments begin to fully reflect the wider picture of concerning New Zealand health data? I consider this to be a most urgent matter, a matter of life and death. I trust you do also.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

Unreliable Narrators Strike Again—RNZ on the Attack

A group of Scottish medicos are calling for the reintroduction of mask wearing in mid-summer. They’re worried, but why? After three and half years and the largest government expenditure on a single issue outside of wartime, nothing appears to have been resolved, and worse, it’s getting worse.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

It is not so much that Covid is here to stay. We knew that from the start, coronaviruses don’t disappear they just become milder, rather excess deaths appear to be here to stay. That is a very difficult issue for anyone to spin, but almost everyone is trying very hard to do so.

In two days time, Radio New Zealand launches a seven-part multimedia presentation entitled ‘Under Current—Misinformation in Aotearoa‘. The images and voices in the trailer denigrate those raising questions about Covid policy, whose sole purpose is erroneously described in the podcast as orchestrating an ‘all out attack on the heart of democracy’.

The problem with this absurd suggestion is the fact that questions about drug safety do not in any way amount to disinformation or political anarchy—in reality, it is RNZ who is proving the unreliable narrator stoking division.

Hiding side effects has become stock in trade for the pharmaceutical industry. You might have read a headline this morning which shouted out to us New Alzheimer’s wonder drug ‘can slow disease progression by 60pc’,

but it does not.

Overall just 22% of trial participants showed improvements, and the improvements were so minor (just 2% improvement on the Alzheimer’s Disease Rating Scale of 144 measures), that relatives may not be able to notice them. Weigh this miniscule gain against the 37% of trial participants who suffered brain bleeds as a result of the medication. Ouch! Three people died as a result of the treatment.

The Alzheimer’s drug is supposed to work by attacking amyloid plaque in the brain, however, recent research suggests this may not be the main cause of Alzheimer’s, as this article investigates: “Seminal Alzheimer’s study claiming memory-robbing disease was caused by build-up of protein in brain may have been MANIPULATED, damning investigation claims”.

Questions about drug safety have to be asked, it’s just a normal matter, and that does not amount to spreading misinformation or undermining democracy. Especially when concerns are backed up by scientific papers and the government’s own data. The word ‘democracy’ means that everyone should have a say in government.

What is the end goal of the heightened rhetoric in the RNZ piece? What exactly are they hoping to achieve? How did we end up so far from our cultural roots?

You get the picture don’t you? We are facing an industry that is determined to sell drugs to governments and equally determined to hide how ineffective and dangerous they are. This is being helped along by a willing and thoughtless media.

Modern drugs have become more dangerous because they are designed to edit processes automatically controlled by DNA. None more so than Covid mRNA and adenovirus vaccines, which invade cells and alter genetic functions. These powerful genetic vaccines have side effects whose invasive extent surpasses any previous drugs. There is a fine line between a life-changing drug and a life-threatening drug. We appear to have crossed that line.

In his book The Body Illustrated’, Bill Bryson, after exhaustively consulting the great and famous about DNA, concludes “How all this works in detail is still largely a mystery to us”. Wise words. The extent of that mystery is now becoming clear, much of what little we thought we knew is now known to be false.

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

The problem here is not minor. It involves human life, longevity, ability, and continuity. Genetic and epigenetic alterations are inherited. This is well known to science. Altering something so absolutely vital as our genetics without fully understanding how it actually works is beyond foolish. It appears to be killing people and threatens generations to come.

Medical orthodoxy entered into the pandemic with an absolute faith in vaccination strategies, yet this now appears to be incompatible with the actual outcomes of pandemic policies and interventions. This has created an almost schizophrenic atmosphere of fear and a conflict mentality illustrated by the violent images inappropriately used in the RNZ trailer.

None of this does justice to what is essentially a scientific question—are Covid vaccines safe? There is a lot of finger pointing and, especially here in New Zealand, a lot of denial, but there appear to be no answers on offer except a tired refrain to vax and vax again.

Dr. Victoria Male at Imperial College wishes to support an advisory for mothers-to-be to have boosters during pregnancy, yet she admits that “we don’t have all the evidence yet”. There is a lot of evidence. You can review the frightening Pfizer trial data on pregnant women here and reflect on the record rates of stillbirths and miscarriages here.

Dr. Male’s comments illustrate the level of paradoxical thinking that seems to have gripped the medical community in the face of rising rates of illness and death. It is becoming clearer by the week that something has gone terribly wrong, yet many are becoming more strident in their refusal to countenance facts. Yesterday Dr Siouxsie Wiles attempted to make ‘refusing to engage in debate’ a virtue in her bewildering opinion piece for Stuff.

Contrast Dr Wiles stance with the more open balanced viewpoint of epidemiologist Dr. Vinay Prasad in his substack “Public Health Should Lose Your Trust”. Dr. Prasad is not an anti-vaxxer by any stretch of the imagination, and he recognises that public trust and drug safety relies on good research. He bemoans the absence of mainstream debate during the pandemic.

So How Do You Resolve the Issue of Vaccine Safety if Refusal to Answer Questions is Held Up as a Virtue?

The solution is really very, very simple, ridiculously so. There are crucial scientific tests of causality which will ultimately reveal responsibility. When light arriving from distant stars was measured and found to be bent by the sun’s gravity, critics of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity were silenced.

A year ago, it became clear that repeated Covid vaccination was associated with higher Covid death rates. Your chance of dying with Covid is greatly enhanced if you have had a booster, official data graphed below that our government, medical tsars, and paid media never publicly discuss.

Forget all the high-sounding moral coercion, fear mongering, obscure scientific jargon and PR hype designed to manipulate us. It’s dangerous. Instead, record vax status on death certificates and compare the death rate of the unvaccinated to the vaccinated. Governments and medical authorities have done the opposite. They have failed to publish this data. Now why would they do that? By hiding information, are they protecting democracy or undermining it? Are they using or misusing science? Are they serving the public or deceiving them?

Photo Credit:

Photo by engin akyurt on Unsplash

The Pandemic Started a Medical Gold Rush and Its Happening Now

We are still being told the Covid vaccines are safe. This narrative runs against the accumulating evidence of excess deaths and adverse reactions. For example, the Western Australian government has just issued a report documenting a rate of adverse reactions to Covid vaccines 24 times larger than any previous vaccine. However, there is still the rebuttal—the result of Covid infection would have been devastating without the vaccine. Yet this argument too falls apart when you examine the data.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

So how or why did medical professionals get it all so terribly wrong? From my own correspondence, it is clear that in the early days, there was still a significant amount of caution. Medsafe asked Pfizer a long list of questions about their safety concerns. Biotechnologists I corresponded with were willing to underline the experimental nature of the vaccine and admit there were a lot of unknowns. But this wasn’t everyone.

The Covid Pandemic Was a Moving Gravy Train and Many Were Anxious to Get on Board

For medical professionals, there were huge opportunities for career advancement and promotional payments for those willing to speak up in favour of vaccination. For the media, advertising revenue could rocket if you made the right noises. For politicians, there was public exposure on a scale never before seen. In the beginning, there was little reliable data, and the temptation to exaggerate was huge.

Mary T Bassett, New York Health Commissioner, admitted in early 2022 that she deliberately publicised very rare incidents of paediatric hospitalisations to motivate paediatricians and families to seek the protection of vaccination for young children who faced virtually no risk from COVID-19.

Dr. Kristen Anderson wrote extensively in support of a natural zoonotic origin of Covid, leading the attack against those suggesting a lab leak, in effect labelling them conspiracy theorists. His leaked private correspondence with colleagues now tells a different story, he wrote: “The main issue is that accidental escape is in fact highly likelyit’s not some fringe theory.”

Campus physician Dr. Lewis Osofsky at Santa Clara University in California has been instrumental in enforcing their vaccination requirement for students, which continues to the present day. He has been consistently denying vaccine exemptions. He also holds medical appointments, which accrue lucrative bonuses if there are high vaccine compliance rates. Read about it here. This is just one example among hundreds of thousands of cases, including here in New Zealand, where doctor incomes or bonuses are tied to vaccine uptake.

The pandemic has seeded a fast pace of social and professional change that is not unprecedented in history. When the Nazi party came to power in Germany, it rapidly became clear to everyone that if you wanted to advance your career prospects, you needed to join the party. Look at who is standing next to Tedros Ghebreyesus, Director General of WHO, our former Director General of Health Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, playing a leading role in a committee to amend international health regulations to control global health policy including future pandemic measures and vaccine travel requirements.

In the new medical, political, and media climate it is always possible to lose your job and income if you ask probing questions.

A correspondent has taken me to task for referencing an article from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment entitled “Significant increase in memory and concentration problems among adults“, because I didn’t say that the article does not mention Covid vaccines as a possible cause.

The article reports a 24% increase in GP consultations concerning memory and concentration loss in the first quarter of 2023. This is spread across all age groups over 25 years old, but the largest increase is among 45-74 year olds up 40%. The 24-44 age group is up 31%, and the 74+ up 18%.

The article admits that the source of this huge increase is unclear, yet suggests possible explanations: this might be due to the effect of lockdowns in 2021 or due to the aftermath of Covid infection. Do they really think that eighteen months after lockdowns, people are suddenly losing their memory?

Moreover, the effect size appears too large to be due solely to long Covid, and the results are upside down, the younger age groups are suffering more than the elderly cohort considered most at risk. Just remember, in the current official climate, as with those examples cited above, it doesn’t pay to ask questions. Luckily some are prepared to do so, but no one is answering.

Now that the true extent of adverse effects is coming out, it appears that some people will go to great lengths to protect their reputations. On May 12, 2023, we took a snapshot of New Zealand excess deaths from the Human Mortality Database (on the left hand side). Today we took a snapshot of the same data which miraculously has been altered to the extent that it is almost unrecognisable. The orange is excess deaths above the long term average, the blue reduced deaths below the long term average. My, my! I wonder if this has anything to do with the questions we keep very publicly asking?

The raw data, tabulated by the OECD, looks like this. The zero line is the historical average. As you can see, excess deaths are consistently up.

The Pandemic is Not Stopping, It Was Too Profitable to Come to an End

When gold was discovered in Otago, people rushed there from all over the world to stake their claim. We are now witnessing a rush to offer new vaccines and drugs in the hope of huge profits. Pharmaceutical giant GSK is releasing a vaccine it calls Arevxy against common runny nose infection RSV which it says is 94% effective, although the side effects are worryingly familiar. The target populations are the over 60s and newborns. ‘Newborns’ means that ultimately GSK hopes every baby will have to take it, in other words everyone.

The UK Sun leads with “JABS UP Millions to get vaccine to protect against ‘fatal’ virus that lives in 90% of Brits – are you eligible?” promoting the Shingrix vaccine already available here in New Zealand. Good job they put the word ‘fatal’ in inverted commas, Shingles almost never is. Although enjoying the title ‘vaccine’, Shingrix doesn’t actually prevent shingles, instead it is claimed to reduce the symptoms. Sound familiar?

These claims pale by comparison with those offered by Harvard scientists who announced they have discovered the elixir of youth consisting of six chemical cocktails which reportedly helped mice skin cells survive a little longer. Very timely really, considering human population longevity is rapidly reducing probably due to other chemical cocktails we are regularly given in our food and medicines.

Exaggerated tales of golden reefs were no strangers to the gold fields where disappointed miners tried to sell their dud claims to newly arrived prospectors. The idea that a chemical cocktail is going to lead to eternal life is a tired narrative that is past its sell by date. The huge gains in longevity we enjoyed during the last century were due to hygiene and nutrition, not to pharmaceutical concoctions. Don’t be tempted to swap the benefits of a natural varied diet for the promises of a pill salesperson. The medical gold rush is going nowhere except down the drain.

I am hoping you will join me in asking again and again, why are our hospitals overwhelmed? Why are excess deaths at unprecedented historical highs? Why are our politicians, medical professionals, and media remaining silent? Why are thousands injured by vaccines being gaslighted and ignored? Why is the government still telling the public it is essential to keep on getting Covid vaccinations and many other novel biotech cures? The longer this goes on, the more criminally motivated it all appears.

How Dumb Do They Think We Are?

There are a lot of things that our current crop of politicians, like snake oil salesmen, are anxious we shouldn’t be allowed to know, but the facade is beginning to crumble.

This article is available as an Audio file and a PDF document.

A minister in the Spanish government has flown in a private jet to attend a climate conference, then switched to a limo from the airport. 100 metres from the venue, she emerged from the limo to mount an electric bike and ride to the entrance for the photo opportunity. I don’t need to add a commentary to this, but some of our New Zealand cows being blamed for climate change might like to do so.

An article published by the Australian ABC entitled “Ten positive tests and counting: The mystery of why some people just keep catching COVID” is a puzzle in itself. How could the writer get through the long article without mentioning Covid vaccines? A brief internet search should have been enough to uncover this peer-reviewed scientific article, “IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein

You may have seen a story doing the rounds—a top BBC presenter has reportedly been caught out paying hush money to vulnerable young men he had apparently exploited. The presenter wasn’t named, but a search through today’s UK papers reveals exactly who he is. You may be surprised to know he is very familiar to viewers here in New Zealand. He is often the one hosting top stories from overseas, including how effective Covid vaccines are.

If you are agreeing with our politicians that excess deaths are nothing to worry about, or rather they don’t exist, then you might read this article “Hospital ‘hot-bedding’: Waitākere Hospital patients moved from beds to chairs to free up space“. Also try “‘Very disturbing’ wait times of up to 18 months for cardiac scans”. Now what could possibly have caused that?

Or if you have freed yourself from the Ardern doctrine to not look further than our shoreline, you might have found out from the British Heart Foundation that 100,000 extra people have died from heart disease in the UK (but no one knows why) or looked at Edward Dowd’s reports of the dramatic increase in US disability stats.

There is a salutary lesson here. Don’t have any more Covid shots, and be very careful about the exotic vaccines now being touted, such as the forthcoming RSV shot for the over 50s. It is no coincidence that this is being reported in the financial press as a shot in the arm for big pharma profits. There is also the Alzheimers shot intended for people with Downs Syndrome, which is now proposed to be repurposed for the elderly. The list of new vaccines is endless, and we will be the people trying them out.

For decades the long term effects of vaccines have been swept under the carpet. Fortunately, the pandemic has opened the eyes of some. These long term effects need researching. Igor Chudov’s substack reports “Cognitive Impairment in Adults – What Role Did COVID Vaccines Play?” Chudov features the detailed analysis of a medical doctor in the US Midwest who reports increased cases of a worrying rapid decline in cognitive ability among elderly patients. By no means everyone is experiencing this, but he points out that the growth in numbers of people concerned enough to visit their GP points to a more widespread unreported rate of milder but significant symptoms. Chudov also reports results from the Netherlands where there has been a 18%-40% increase among different age brackets over 25 years in GP consultations about memory and concentration loss in 2023 compared to 2020.

There is too much to say and too little space to say it in this blog, but one final parting shot: hands up class, how many of you still believe that Covid came from a cute furry animal somewhere in Asia? Our politicians, media experts, and big pharma moguls really don’t want us to think about that. Otherwise, we may realise that we are all, whether vaccinated or unvaccinated, suffering from a surfeit of biotechnology. In which case, their gravy train could come to a grinding halt. As my French teacher used to say, wake up at the back there.

Happy Birthday, It’s a Mad Mad World

0

It’s my birthday today, and I was spoiled for choice this morning when I looked at the newspapers. Reports of increased cancer rates described as ‘stark’, brain disease described as the ‘tip of the iceberg’, heart disease ‘soaring’. and the next pandemic already labeled as even deadlier than Covid‘.

This article is available as an Audio file and a PDF document.

Then there is the violence. Americans celebrated the 4th of July, 2023 with 16 deadly mass shootings across the nation. Here in New Zealand, violent raids on local dairies and jewellers have become so common they rapidly drop out of the news, if they even make it.

Then there is the madness. Sussex police have warned people to look out for a large 6ft 3in woman with brightly dyed red hair who is wandering around raping boys. I hope I am sufficiently far from the wrath of the English legal system to inform you that this is definitely not a woman, but a man. However, no one in the police or UK media is allowed to tell us that.

Then there is the medicine. Among the new wonder drugs is the cocktail being given to some men to induce them to lactate, including Prolactin, Domperidone, Progestin, Haloperidol, Risperidone, Chlorpromazine, Fluphenazine and Metoclopramide. I pity the men or any babies involved in this medical malpractice. Look up the former use and deadly side effects of these drugs for yourself. I don’t have space to list them.

Other birthday medical greetings arrived from Te Whatu Ora, who have gone into overdrive advising everyone to jab again, mask up, take Paxlovid (don’t worry about the side effects, they are normal), and insist that your friends and family do so also. The pandemic is officially over, but the compulsion to over medicate is not, nor the vast expenditure on advertising.

Finally, there is the technology. The headline in the Telegraph says it all: AI girlfriend ‘told crossbow intruder to kill Queen Elizabeth at Windsor Castle’. His chatbot named Sarai informed the would-be royal assassin that his plan was “very wise” and said “we have to find a way” to assassinate the Queen. How many times do we have to explain that artificial intelligence has difficulty distinguishing right from wrong and fact from falsehood? It is dumb and obviously dangerous.

It Has Rapidly Become a Rather Frightening World Out There

Has it ever occurred to you that we might have got the science of genetics all wrong? Someone has to say it out loud, so I will share a few thoughts on the subject today.

Our education has taught us that the natural world should be described through a number of disciplines which are kept distinctly separate from one another—physics, chemistry, biology, etc.—each operating at different time and distance scales. What if the world is not neatly divided into these compartments but is rather an integrated whole? What if genetic structures are linked with the wider laws of nature described by physics? No need to pose this question. They obviously are, only we never really think about the implications of this.

Human life and intelligence is embedded in the life and intelligence of the Cosmos. But how? This question highlights how little we know, and how much we pretend to know. If human intelligence relied on a system similar to that driving computers, we wouldn’t be intelligent in the sense we now understand it. We would be stuck with the mind of Sarai, the crossbow assassin’s mad AI friend.

This raises the question ‘what is happening to us?’ Have we lost touch with Cosmic intelligence? Does our connection with the wider laws of nature rely on our exact genetic structure so precisely, that the intervention of an mRNA vaccine could disrupt it? Could this mean that we are losing the capacity to distinguish right from wrong, truth from falsehood?

Let me put this in an entirely different way. Has our genetic concept of what it is to be human been completely mistaken because we never talk about our identity in terms of consciousness or as others would say soul?

The great traditions of human thought throughout history have never shrunk from admitting that we have an immortal soul. For example, some picture consciousness sitting in the body as a rider sits in a chariot drawn by horses. In this analogy, the rider is consciousness, the mind is the charioteer, and the horses are the five senses. Is this only possible when almost unimaginably complex genetic structures function as they should, connecting everything together into an integrated whole? What if the charioteer were to lose contact with the rider in the chariot, the one who is telling him the ultimate purpose of the journey?

Today I have a birthday wish. I wish that our politicians, medical czars, and media will stop quibbling about whether unprecedented excess deaths and hospitalisations or crime waves and strange behaviour can be explained away by tired cliches and wildly imaginative causes, but rather devote themselves to asking the question that is going begging: How did biotechnology make the world so mad? The answer to this question is simple: stop biotechnology experimentation before it is too late.

If you like to support me and my team, we’d greatly appreciate it 🙂

Donations can be made directly into our bank account:
Hatchard Report 03-0275-0056783-001

Or if you are overseas or prefer to use a Credit/Debit card

Thank you.