Home Blog Page 19

The Great Pandemic Confidence Trick

0

There is a new book out called Anansi’s Gold by Yepoka Yeebo which tells the story of how a convicted small-time confidence trickster John Ackah Blay-Miezah originally from Ghana reinvented himself and fooled the world’s elite. His outrageous claims to be the guardian of a pile of gold, diamonds and cash worth $27bn proved alluring to punters as Blay-Miezah travelled the world parroting the lifestyle of the rich.

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

Curiously, those fooled by the con were not put off when the promised rewards failed to materialise at a string of supposed payouts organised at luxury hotels and resorts. Blay-Miezah was so convincing and adept at playing the role of a fabulously rich man with access to a secret hoard that his excuses only added to the mysterious chic of the scheme, leaving those who had been fooled even more convinced. You can read a summaryhere.

The story resonates with the great con foisted on the world’s population during the pandemic. A confidence trick that is still in progress, but beginning to fall apart at the seams. Watch Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, being interviewed by Senator Rand Paul about a payment of $400 million Moderna recently made to the US National Institute of Health (NIH). NIH is the organisation that sets the vaccine policy in the USA which incredibly still recommends repeated Covid vaccines for every age group.

Bancel squirms under cross examination, looks up at the sky, and takes his time to work out how many times or if at all his children were vaccinated. Eventually he lumps for a vague 3 to 4 jabs each, while avoiding eye contact. Incredibly, faced with published studies documenting myocarditis harms to young persons, he pretends that Covid infection is much worse for younger age groups, against all evidence.

Bancel is at the first stage of the classic reaction of a criminal perpetrator when found out. This is known as DARVO which stands for deny, attack, and reverse the position of victim and offender (victim blaming). Bancel was caught by the cameras in denial.

Similar accusations of misleading pandemic advice are flying around at the moment. Vinay Prasad a renowned and highly published expert on drug testing for safety has published a blank sheet on his X feed saying “I found all the reliable evidence that [Pfizer’s] Paxlovid prevents or reduces long covid and compiled them in this figure”. In other words, there is no evidence.

A couple of days ago I summarised data published by Stats NZ recording an unprecedented increase in annual deaths for the year to July 2023 (up 14%), a decrease in the natural birth increase (down 28%) compared to pre-pandemic. Figures published by the Household Labour Force Survey show that disability (incapacity to work) is up 37.5% over the same period. Despite being a simple regurgitation of official data, this was met with denial in some quarters, one hapless doctor replied “it is all lies” without bothering to check the facts.

Nor are we strangers to attacks. I feel deeply sorry for all those hundreds of thousands of individuals around the world severely injured by Covid vaccines whose symptoms have been dismissed as imaginary, minor, or even the result of their own actions. Many have been denied appropriate treatment or attacked and gaslighted online for speaking up.

Attempts to reverse truth and present the infliction of injury as a virtue are incomprehensible and repugnant (a process known as whitewashing). NZ has reported its lowest natural increase in births and lowest fertility rate since 1943 during the second world war. Similar figures are being recorded in other countries including the UK. Professor Sarah Harper CBE, founder and director of the Oxford Institute of Population Ageing and a former government adviser, said yesterday:

“I think it’s a good thing that the high-income, high-consuming countries of the world are reducing the number of children that they’re having. I’m quite positive about that.”

The latest figures involve a sudden acceleration of a gradual long term trend of reducing fertility and increasing deaths that is not predicted from the prior data and therefore highly unlikely to be the result of an ageing population or changing values as some suggest. Fertility is closely connected with individual health. Professor Harper’s comment attempts to portray failing health in developed countries as a benefit, rather than the outcome of increasingly poor diet and the adverse effects of modern medicine.

All the above have the classic hallmarks of a con. Repeatedly, advocates of biotechnology are announcing imminent cures for diseases while presiding over increases in rates of chronic illness and iatrogenic disease (illness caused by treatments). A string of announcements of imminent improvements in Covid vaccines and treatments similar to this one from Oxford University fall into this category. Like the promises of Blay-Miezah, they never seem to materialise. Instead being substituted over time by new even more alluring promises (you can find out more about the biotech fraud here).

Blay-Miezah was eventually caught out when, like Stephane Bancel in front of Rand Paul, he failed miserably during a probing interview with 60 minutes. In Blay-Miezah’s case, we are talking about a time when mainstream media was still exposing fraud. It isn’t now and apparently doesn’t intend to do so in future.

We are entering a new age where medical authorities can dictate media content with impunity.

In an alarming development, YouTube has introduced a new “medical misinformation policy” that will now censor not just Covid information but any medical or health-related content that doesn’t align with claims made by the World Health Organisation (WHO) or Local Health Authorities (LHAs). In other words, we are likely to be censored if we question the safety of certain modern medical approaches or we discuss complementary approaches to maintain health. This extends the freedom of WHO and LHAs to gaslight those affected by adverse effects whilst keeping the lid on criticism and natural approaches to health even if verified by the results of studies.

Large payouts to government bodies like the $400 million ‘gift’ of Moderna to NIH are indicative of institutionalised corruption on a grand scale. Sir Jonathan Van-Tam (known as JVT), the UK’s former Chief Medical Officer and an acknowledged expert in something called ‘medical strategy’, has just been appointed a senior medical consultant to biotech giant Moderna in the latest round of revolving door appointments.

During his time as UK Chief Medical Officer Van-Tam made decisions on supply contracts for Covid jabs including with Moderna and appeared regularly on TV to offer simplified explanations of Covid policy intended to reassure the public. Something that according to UK Health Minister Sajid Javid made him a ‘national treasure’. The UK government also cemented a long term research and development contract with Moderna worth £150 million during JVT’s tenure.

I can’t help wondering if JVT’s first task at Moderna will be to coach Stephane Bancel on the right strategy to avoid answering difficult questions on excess deaths and adverse effects of vaccines. It might come in very handy. This would be laughable if it didn’t involve human life on a scale that is beginning to rival that of wartime.

Our politicians, the media and our doctors are letting us down. The latest data shows Covid jabs have not prevented infection, transmission, serious illness, or death, they have facilitated it. Don’t let go of common sense.

Deaths up 14%, Natural Birth Increase Down 28%, Disability is up 37.5%

0

New Zealand official birth and death figures for 12 months to the end of June 2023 released.

UPDATED: 17 August 2023 8:15 am.

Stats New Zealand released the official figures for births and deaths for the period 1st July 2022 to 30th June 2023 today. The short summary accompanying the release of the horrifying figures compares these to the previous 12 months and reports increases in deaths and reductions in live births. 2022/23 figures would have best been compared to the July 2018 to June 2019 totals, the first available pre-pandemic period. We report this comparison below.

There were 38,442 deaths among all ages for July 2022-June 2023 compared to 33,753 deaths in the 2018/19 comparable period. This is an increase of 4,689 deaths (up 14%) which occurred at a rate of 90 excess deaths per week.

Working age people were also affected. Deaths among 15 to 64 year olds were up by 6%. Figures released by the Household Labour Force Survey reports rates of disability sufficient to preclude joining the workforce among this age group has increased by 37.5% over the same period and now stands at 14.3% of the workforce. That is huge. Why?

Alarmingly, natural live birth increase (births minus deaths) fell from 26,500 in 2018/19 to 19,185 in 2022/23 a decrease of 7,400 or 28%. This is an absolutely unprecedented drop. Nothing even remotely like this has been recorded previously.

Covid deaths over this whole period reported by Our World in Data appear insufficient to explain the increase in deaths. Nor is an ageing population sufficient explanation for the figures that is a long term gradual trend, this is a sudden rise.

We have been aware of data like this for some time now, but there has been deafening silence from our politicians who are currently running for re-election. We are heading into this election under unusual and coercive constraints that have no precedent in our history as a nation.

Due to the events of the last three years, the machinery of government has assumed more control over our medical and food choices. The concerning birth and death figures must be regarded as a verdict on policies which have enjoyed cross party support.

As a result of government policies, we have lost many of our rights as NZ citizens. None of the parties currently elected to Parliament have any plans to revoke this government overreach. So what has gone wrong and how will this affect us if we re-elect the same group of political parties to power?

Pandemic policies have established a precedent allowing the government to enforce compliance with its medical rules. They coerced almost everyone to take specific injections with high rates of adverse effects. Restrictions on social movement and communication have been normalised. Agreements with social media providers and the mainstream press have censored the availability of independent information and hampered scientific dialogue. Access to official public health data has been limited.

The government has also passed the Therapeutic Products Bill which has legitimised the substitution of thousands of natural ingredients with untested synthetic alternatives without requirements for clear labelling. The Bill also facilitates dose restrictions and banning of many traditional herbal products and supplements at the whim of a government bureaucrat.

The government has authorised the addition of chemical fluorides to public water supplies. It has mandated the addition of chemical supplements to staple foods including a synthetic form of folic acid to flour which is hard to metabolise and inhibits some metabolic pathways vital for health.

Re-electing sitting members of parliament from any party is a prescription for more of the same. Our current politicians are refusing to face up to some hard facts. We are in the midst of a medical emergency of unprecedented proportions. Our hospitals are overwhelmed, our politicians are silent.

Unbelievably, our politicians and medical tsars continue to ignore accumulating evidence being published in learned science journals pointing to adverse effects of mRNA vaccines. Despite this, the government is still funding advertising encouraging the population to receive further booster injections. They don’t work and they endanger health.

There are no plans to investigate what has gone wrong. It is time to say goodbye to 120 MPs from across the political spectrum who have spectacularly failed our nation in its hour of need. If they are re-elected our ability to manage our own health choices will be gone for good.

The judgement on their competence is there in black and white from their own statistics—deaths are up 14%, net live birth increase down 28%, disability up 37.5%. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know where this is going. Mistakes were made, and now they cannot be hidden or denied any longer. Some hard questions must be asked and answered.

Our media is compliant and lazy in a coverup. They have enjoyed government support.

None of this is in the character of our nation or in its history. It is time to wake up.

The Uninformed Election That Has Become a Gateway to Chaos

0

After three years of pandemic pandemonium that has all but destroyed the New Zealand we knew and loved, we are heading into an election with all the major parties omitting to discuss or even mention what happened and why. So what did happen?

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

Our health system has been all but destroyed:

It has become difficult to see a GP, with wait times commonly up to four weeks. More than 50% of main centre health clinics are now closed to new patients.

EDs are overwhelmed with some ambulances waiting on the ramp for up to four hours with seriously ill patients on board, Excess deaths are continuing at high levels, but politicians like David Seymour, hoping to govern our country for the next three years, are in denial.

The media is going along with stories of mismanagement and staff shortages, but they are failing to mention the fundamental cause—incidence of illness is up dramatically (see heart disease up 83%, while strokes, cancers, stillbirths, etc. are also up). Why?

It is not hard to find confirmation if you are prepared to look for answers in published scientific literature and overseas reports.

meta-analysis published in Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics on August 3rd has found a significant association between Covid vaccination and cardiac related deaths.

Figures released by the Singapore Government show a 51% decrease in live births and an increase in deaths. A study published in Obstetrics and Gynecology July 14 2023 has found high levels of adverse outcomes among infants related to mRNA vaccine dose levels. US VAERS data confirms the risks of miscarriage and stillbirth are high following Covid vaccination.

Clare Craig, former NHS pathologist, reports that Covid deaths are continuing at elevated levels in highly vaccinated countries, but have fallen to almost zero in countries with low vaccination rates.

Rates of sudden cardiac death among younger persons continue to rise. A report in the journal Vaccine: X indicates that vaccine-induced myocarditis cases can relapse months after apparent initial recovery.

These are just a few among hundreds of reports surfacing overseas and in scientific literature that are being completely ignored by the New Zealand media and elected politicians. In Australia and some other countries, as we have been reporting, the high rate of vaccine injury has just become a topic that can be openly discussed. See here for comments from medical professionals concerning some of these injuries. The silence in New Zealand is deafening.

Just think what this means for our future. Those standing for election among the major parties are:

  • Happy to tolerate manipulation of media content
  • Unable to learn vital lessons from the failures of pandemic policy
  • Mindlessly swallowing excuses offered by those to blame for deaths, including themselves
  • Unable to press the emergency button as people die in unprecedented numbers (and it is not from Covid)
  • Unable to grasp the risks of biotechnology experimentation

The facile policies on offer from the major parties are mind numbing in their naivety. The National Party and ACT want to deregulate biotechnology because they say it will boost the economy and health of the nation. Do they even read the newspapers? Read this tale of woe in today’s UK Guardian headlined “Sales at vegan burger maker Beyond Meat fall by almost a third”.

Consumers don’t want biotech food, they can’t afford it, and they don’t trust it for good reasons. It isn’t even profitable. Biotech food companies riding high on an investment bubble a couple of years ago are now worth pennies in the dollar. Many are even going bankrupt. Consumers are apparently asking questions and preferring safe, natural ingredients like chickpeas, a preference the failing biotech food companies ludicrously describe as the work of special ‘interest groups’.

Biotechnology experimentation is not safe, but it is proliferating with government encouragement. Even with the best intentions, accidents occur. See this report on possible unsafe testing labs in New Zealand handling typhoid bacteria. This is just an inkling of what might happen if the industry is deregulated as National and ACT are suggesting. In the USA, lack of regulation has led to the proliferation of unsafe labs handling deadly pathogens. Moreover, much of the work being undertaken is so highly dangerous it could wipe out mankind.

Of gain of function research, Kevin M. Esvelt, an evolutionary and ecological engineer at MIT, wrote in a 2021 opinion piece: “I implore every scientist, funder, and nation working in this field: Please stop.” Purposefully creating a pathogen that could wipe out millions of people—regardless of its hoped-for benefit—is “insanity,” global security and biodefense expert Dr. Laura Kahn told the author of a comprehensive article covering the topic.

Contrast this with the dangerous drivel being spoon fed to the New Zealand public in support of crazy biotech experimentation. Last week Jesse Mulligan featured a podcast with an American English teacher (???) Ted Anton. Together these two poorly informed influencers manage to describe genetic modification as similar to, and as safe as, making cheese or jam at home. They promised us a bright economic future and a giant evolutionary leap that can be engineered as simply as driving a car. I could go on—the inaccuracies and unsubstantiated wild claims in this podcast include working cures for cancer based on synthetic biology—they don’t exist, but we won’t know it if we trust Jesse Mulligan for medical advice—we shouldn’t.

From a published science perspective this is laughable and would remain so if it wasn’t for the fact that our politicians appear to be basing their projected policies on similar levels of misinformation. They are planning to lead us into an entirely imaginary dazzling biotech future. At the same time they are refusing to discuss the adverse events that actually happened on an unprecedented scale during the pandemic, and are still happening.

This schizophrenic juxtaposition of events is coming to an election booth near you.

If you are planning to vote for one of the currently elected parties and think that will change things, think again. Unfortunately, there is only one political party, with a chance of being elected, currently discussing the outcomes of the pandemic and planning to hold an independent inquiry, and that is NZ First. Whether we like it or not, that is the stark reality we face. Each of us will make up our own mind and that is everyone’s right. Personally, I am planning to vote for Winston. All the other parties currently registering in the polls appear ready and eager to lead us further down the dangerous, unhealthy, chaotic pandemic path we traversed.

Government officials have warned that NZ faces a bleak future. If Labour, the Greens, the Maori Party, ACT, or National get in, I agree. They all played their role in pandemic policies, roles they appear eager to hide and forget. So I leave you with this thought: the authoritative Washington Post has noticed that society is falling apart. According to the Post, people have forgotten how to behave in social situations like going to the movies, attending theatres, meeting friends or even flying on a plane saying:

“Nobody’s quite figured out where everyone’s good manners have gone — and what is exactly causing the current collapse in civility.”

Now I wonder what might have caused that? When we mark our ballot paper, let’s not make the next three years worse.

Follow me and join the conversation on Twitter and/or Facebook

Why Do We Ask the Same Questions Again and Again?

0

Someone wrote to us after our last article, “Startling revelations change everything New Zealanders have been schooled to believe” and complained that my writing is too depressing. They suggested I write instead about the need for a cleaner environment and organic food. If you read my blog, you will be aware that I sometimes do. In any case, by way of answer, it is worth reflecting on how we got into this mess and how we may exit it.

This article is also available as a PDF document to print/download and share. You can also listen to an audio version here.

For the last thirty years, I have been writing about the dangers of genetic technology. Simply put, genetic engineering is inherently mutagenic, spreads everywhere, and can’t be recalled. Life is completely dependent on the integrity of precise genetic structures, yet biotechnologists are recklessly editing them. Research only confirms the contention that the risks are unacceptable while the promised benefits have never materialised. The inevitable adverse effects routinely plague unwitting guinea pigs in trials. The shady and secretive biotechnology industry has grown exponentially and now stalks the whole world’s population.

Despite winning some battles over the years, such as the requirement to label genetically modified foods in many countries, we have found that biotechnology advocates keep pushing and keep overturning precautionary regulations in food and medicine. The constant personnel turnover in our system of governance has to shoulder a significant portion of the blame for this. The politicians, heads of industry, and medical administrators that I and others have met over thirty years to carefully explain the risks, are mostly long gone from positions of authority and now safely retired with generous pensions and golden handshakes.

Every few years, a fresh crop replaces them, wet behind the ears and bristling to bring something new to the table and secure their own retirement. The continuity of wisdom inevitably disappears. Right now, the National Party, along with ACT, if elected, are proposing to deregulate current bioengineering safeguards and replace them with incentives. I worked in the export food certification industry in the USA and represented it around the world. I know that high quality GE free produce attracts higher prices and greater access to markets. This proposed move will hurt our agricultural productivity, our export economy, and our valuable overseas image.

In the wings lie unscrupulous players, in it for the long haul, seeking to make profits out of other people’s misery. Unfortunately, newly elected politicians and their ilk often fall easy prey to deceptive promises and generous financial incentives. In the modern world, there is little regard for truth, science, morality, or consequences—the end justifies the means. It is an old story, but will it ever be possible to bring it to an end?

So where could we find a source of continuity? The answer lies in the laws of nature, and that includes our own nature. There is a stability in natural laws that our governing institutions sadly lack. The sun, the seasons, gravity, light, and plants all shout to us authentic tales of stable governance. Curiously, physics tells us that the source of this stable system of world governance is a unified level of nature’s functioning. The hallmark of this unified field is its capacity to be awake and well ordered everywhere, at every point in space and time, where it also promotes the freedom to grow and evolve.

To experience this, we must appreciate that the nature of the universe is our own nature. We have quiet spaces in our consciousness that mirror the organising power of natural laws. If we ever want to be free of oppression, we must cultivate the experience of these spaces and help others to do so.

If you want to know who I am voting for in October’s election, I am hoping to find someone with an open mind, someone who values knowledge, who feels a sense of awe when the sun rises, and actually has a chance of being elected. Let me know if you can find someone like that in your local politics.

Otherwise, I have maintained a personal commitment to organic growing and freedom from pollution for many years. I know that many of you also have your chosen paths of self-development. If you would like to know more, I have written about this and the hundreds of published studies which support the benefits of natural approaches to health, happiness, and intelligence in my book Your DNA Diet. There is great untapped power in nature.

Book: Your DNA Diet. Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World

So if we believe that there are personal approaches to well being and sacred spaces, why is the Hatchard Report emphasising so strongly and exclusively on the need to control biotechnology experimentation? The answer lies in the extreme danger it poses to everything that you and I hold dear. The reckless global attempt to undermine the stability of human genetics threatens everything. Even the WHO has released a report this week admitting there were 14 million excess deaths worldwide in 2021, only 5 million of which they attributed to Covid. We are only just beginning to appreciate what the mechanics of such devastating effects might be.

See, for example, this paper published last month in Vaccine which details the possible epigenetic crosstalk between Covid vaccines and our human genome. This is the same genome which supports our capacity to contemplate truth, to grow organic foods, to think rationally, to express compassion, to love life, to worship, and laugh despite adversity. If we allow someone to interfere with what allows us to express who we are, what would we and our dear ones become? Keep asking questions and explaining, the alternatives are unthinkable.

Just remember that the world of biotechnology has become so vast and invasive that it is no longer possible to sit on the sidelines. See, for example, a study published in Science entitled “A genetically engineered Plasmodium falciparum parasite vaccine provides protection from controlled human malaria infection”. It reports that mosquitos have been genetically engineered to vaccinate people against malaria. This ‘vaccination’ involved multiple exposures to large numbers of engineered mosquitoes, and its effects possibly lasted for a few months in some participants. One trial subject reported suffering a blistered swollen arm, but said the $4,100 payment to subjects and the sense of having done something good made it all worthwhile.

Soon if we are stung by a mosquito in our organic garden, we might need to pause for thought, but that’s only if we have been able to source non genetically engineered seed. I have been invited to attend an organic growers conference. The main topic is not how to grow but how to protect organics from biotechnology. If we don’t, there won’t be any organic gardens anywhere and no natural herbal remedies either. Speaking up is essential, its importance has begun to rival taking care of ourselves naturally. In the modern world, you can’t have one without the other.

Support needed now: If you can support our work financially, it is needed right now and will be much appreciated. During the last couple of months, two aging computers that we rely on have broken down irrevocably. Their necessary replacement involves substantial outgoings beyond our current means. Our daily work includes not just researching, communicating, and writing but also designing, maintaining, and protecting our websites. This takes time, energy and significant ongoing financial resources. Very few of those receiving our blog actually support us financially. Every small regular donation helps us to keep going. A larger one-off donation can also help us to make ends meet. You can donate direct to our bank account:

Hatchard Report 03-0275-0056783-001

Or go to this link to use a credit/debit card

Thank you for your support.

Follow me and join the conversation on Twitter and/or Facebook

Startling Revelations Change Everything New Zealanders Have Been Schooled to Believe

0

Bombshell revelations reported this weekend by The Australian, a leading broadsheet owned by the Murdoch group, have huge implications for pandemic policy here in New Zealand. They should completely change public perceptions and understanding of the Covid landscape. These implications include legal liability, safety of public health measures, future pandemic responses, and personal health choices.

This article is available as a PDF document to print/download or share.

The Weekend Australian leads with an investigative article entitled‘Covid Cover-Up: How Science was Silenced’covering a chilling admission of guilt from Robert Kadlec—former Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Health at the US Department of Health. Kadlec told The Australian that he, Dr. Fauci, and National Institute of Health Director Francis Collins privately discussed how to turn down the heat on China in the early days of the pandemic by playing down concerns about a lab leak from Wuhan.

Kadlec said, 

“I think Tony Fauci was trying to protect his institution and his own reputation from the possibility that his agency was funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology researchers who, beyond the scope of the grants received from the National Institutes of Health, may have been working with People’s Liberation Army researchers on defensive coronavirus vaccines.”

‘Defensive coronavirus vaccine research’ is a euphemism for military-funded gain of function research to mutate deadly pathogens in order to explore the creation of vaccines for use in the event of a bio-war.

Kadlec admitted, “We think vaccine research resulted in the pandemic—that vaccine research was the proximate cause.”

As a result, Kadlec said, 

“we decided to encourage a group of leading international scientists to calm down speculation on the origin of the virus.”

>>> Support the Hatchard Report with a small donation <<<

The front page Australian article dated 29th July 2023 and three other articles on subsequent pages of the same edition, all covering the explosive admissions, are hidden behind an expensive online paywall shared with the WSJ, but you can view a photo of the newspaper here and examine more detailed evidence here.

It comes on top of leaked private communications showing that leading scientists, very publicly debunking the lab leak theory, in actuality believed it was almost certainly correct. At the time, my own communications with top scientists working in the gene therapy field showed that it was widely understood that the genetic structures associated with the Covid spike protein were man made, yet saying so could lose you your job.

If you are new to this kind of discussion, you are probably asking why haven’t we seen articles like these here in New Zealand? The answer is revealed by a reporter from ABC News, talking with colleagues from the Sydney Morning Herald and the Australian which was inadvertently caught on a hot mic. One describes it as ‘annoying and amazing’ that the lab leak theory now looks to be correct. The journalists admit that they never looked at the lab leak theory dispassionately, but relied on their ideological rejection of those asking questions. In other words, there was no credible investigation of the facts by mainstream media.

The Implications for New Zealand of the Latest Covid Revelations

For three years, we have been divided as a nation along the lines of vaccinated versus unvaccinated. It is now abundantly clear that both Covid and Covid vaccines originated from risky biotechnology research on mutated deadly pathogens.

Rather than a divided nation, we could have been a united nation, standing shoulder to shoulder against novel biotechnology experimentation.

There is a need to spell out the technical implications of this. The engineered spike protein has features which are completely foreign to our immune system. At the start of the pandemic, our physiology had no evolutionary context or memory of fighting off these novel genetic sequences. It is now apparent that the spike protein has a toxic profile, especially for the heart and circulatory system. Thus Covid infection had both short and long term unquantified implications for health. The various Covid vaccines were designed to teach our cells to produce Covid spike proteins in quantity, therefore the vaccines inevitably also had significant short and long term implications for health dictated by their pathogenic design.

If we had known that Covid was an engineered pathogen, we would have recognised that concerns about Covid vaccine safety were legitimate.

New Zealand was misled by the US administration. The lesson here is very clear. New Zealand must be more circumspect to scrutinise the health information supplied to our nation from nations and institutions who are clearly tied to commercial endeavours seeking to profit from actions and policy decisions resulting from this information. This includes information received from the WHO, ICMRA, FDA, CDC, WEF, and possibly through Five Eyes. It is now clear that some information we received during the pandemic from these sources was unreliable. False and/or misleading information was received at multiple levels of government, including Medsafe, the PM’s office, and probably our intelligence organisations. Yet New Zealand adopted a trusting perspective and vigorously acted upon it, possibly more stringently than other nations. The result has not just been policy missteps, but high rates of vaccine injuryexcess deaths, economic hardship, and lasting social division.

There is no doubt that PM Jacinda Ardern curated misplaced trust in foreign official sources. We now know these sources were editing scientific dialogue and results to suit commercial and geopolitical agendas.

In a gross error of judgement, Ardern’s department created a policy of exclusion aimed at those questioning the severity of Covid, the lab leak hypothesis, and Covid vaccine safety. This legitimised actions at every level of government and the judiciary to cancel those raising concerns. The Ardern government, with the approval of opposition parties, framed this as a moral crusade and pursued agreements with social media companies to exclude legitimate science and debate. In actuality, we were being played by foreign interests. Our sovereign independence was being undermined to an extent it never has been before. We were losing our right to choose as a nation, and thereby our right to choose as individuals. This illustrates the inherent bankruptcy of the globalist outlook as opposed to our traditional New Zealand outlook of self-determination. It highlights the need for extreme caution in a world of globalised information and media dilution of science.

How Serious Are the Potential Dangers?

In a globalised world, we have to be very circumspect of foreign interests, which certainly do not coincide with those of New Zealand. Consider this article—New evidence of Beijing’s Covid cover-up and possible Wuhan lab leak revealed: China’s public health authorities cracked virus’ genetic code five DAYS before the world knew about the disease, scientist claims. China, like the US, was not sharing information, rather they were sharing disinformation, and they are likely to do so again in the future.

The freewheeling attitude to biotech risk management was underlined this week by a horrifying article entitled “Unassuming warehouse in California turns out to be illegal Chinese-run virus laboratory that was genetically engineering mice and experimenting with HIV, herpes and malaria“. The safety rules governing biotechnology experimentation are simply inadequate for the task. Risky experimentation involving deadly pathogens at poorly secured locations are proliferating around the world. Worse, many are being funded by governments and legally sanctioned. The entire gene editing enterprise, whether safely contained or not, is fraught with unacceptable levels of risk and rife with accidents. Much publicity generated by commercial biotech interests is aimed at persuading the public that these serious risks are non-existent.

On top of this, we have to consider that politicians have little ability to reliably sort the significance of varying evidence when considering any complex scientific advice they receive. Consider this paper published in the Annals of Internal Medicine entitled “The Effect of Influenza Vaccination for the Elderly on Hospitalization and Mortality”, which studied 170 million episodes of influenza care and 7.6 million deaths among those over 64. It concluded back in April 2020:

“No evidence indicated that flu vaccination reduced hospitalisations or mortality among elderly persons. The estimates were precise enough to rule out results from many previous studies.”

Do we hear about this when being urged to take our flu shots? No. The media and the government have long since stopped caring about the exaggerations and profiteering of the pharmaceutical industry.

Across the board, the globalist agenda and the associated information network is driven by ideological priorities remote from our national interests.

Listen, for example, to John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, implying that agricultural production has to be curtailed to contain global warming. It doesn’t seem to bother John Kerry that he frequently travels by private jet. Nor does he seem to appreciate that modern civilization relies on agriculture which started in the Indus Valley 10,000 years ago. By a rambling circuitous route that lacks continuity of thought, Kerry arrives at the idea that because the world’s population is increasing we should reduce the global food supply, an argument worthy of concentration camp systems designed to work people to death. What does that mean for agricultural producers like New Zealand? This is being used to target New Zealand farmers. Our local supermarkets have swallowed the bait, hook, line, and sinker (see here). Remember, the US sees NZ as an agricultural competitor to be controlled rather than assisted. We need to become alert and look out for our own interests.

In the wake of this weekend’s revelations we must appreciate that there are outstanding questions of legal liability.

We have covered some of these in our previous articles:

  • Were we sufficiently warned by Pfizer of the results of trials and post-marketing data indicating very high levels of vaccine adverse effects across a range of conditions? Apparently not.
  • Did our government decide to ignore concerning and unprecedented levels of domestic adverse effects of Covid vaccines because the US and UK authorities were spreading propaganda designed to dampen concerns around biotechnology in order to protect their commercial domination in the field of vaccine research, development and marketing? It appears so.
  • As a result, did the New Zealand Government, our health service, and the Accident Compensation Commission unfairly deny the existence of Covid vaccine injuries, dismiss patients without investigation or testing and withhold compensation? Yes, they did.
  • Did our courts trust government sources without requiring cross examination of government witnesses, and thereby disadvantage appellants? Yes, repeatedly.
  • Is the NZ government still funding a disinformation project driven by ideology aimed at cancelling anyone asking questions about Covid origins, vaccine safety and pandemic policy? Yes, vigorously.

Unfortunately, none of these concerns are within the scope of the New Zealand All of Government COVID-19 Royal Commission of Inquiry which no doubt needs to be urgently widened (Summary of ToR for Royal Commission into COVID and any future pandemic.pdf).

In particular, the government seems to be unaware of the pitfalls of concluding an agreement which cedes our health sovereignty to the World Health Organisation (WHO). People working in distant offices in Geneva, Switzerland, heavily influenced by the global pharmaceutical industry, are unlikely to fully appreciate the concerns of independent scientists and the unique interests of New Zealand and the health of its citizens. On past and present evidence, they are more than likely to work against our interests.

For example, a study published by the prestigious BMJ on 26 February 2020 entitled WHO’s malaria vaccine study represents a “serious breach of international ethical standards” details WHO’s disregard for the adverse effects of an experimental malaria vaccine called Mosquirix in Malawi, Ghana, and Kenya. The trial was projected to involve 720,000 children, yet previous clinical trials found a rate of meningitis in those receiving Mosquirix 10 times that of those who did not, increased cerebral malaria cases, and a doubling in the risk of death (from any cause) in girls. The article bemoans the complete lack of informed consent concerning these serious risks offered to the unsuspecting African child participants and their parents. This is vile. Sound familiar? The WHO 2030 Agenda expects that we will all receive hundreds of novel vaccines over the next ten years, but WHO can’t even manage a single vaccine without violating accepted ethical safeguards. Our government wishes to hand over control of our medical system to these people. Why?

In conclusion, the New Zealand government, the media, the health service, and the judiciary have failed to seriously consider safety questions that have been repeatedly raised despite them being backed by published data and studies. Precaution has been thrown to the winds. The public has been left in the dark because of ideological prejudice and an ill-conceived reliance on foreign authority, alien to our history of self-sufficiency and cultural integrity. This represents a collective failure of our national systems of governance, science, education, information, health and justice. We are waiting to hear words of caution from those among the major parties standing for election in October. Proceeding with our election without anyone in authority admitting and correcting these mistakes will initiate a nightmare journey to further national chaos.

If It Walks Like a Duck and Quacks Like a Duck, It is a Duck

The UK Daily Mail leads today with a story about the heart attack suffered by Bronny James on the basketball court. According to two UK doctors described as leading experts and cited by the Mail, the suggestion that this might be the result of a vaccine injury is a conspiracy theory.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

The article concedes that deaths from heart disease are at record levels and also concedes that Covid vaccines cause heart damage, but stiffly maintains that those conflating these two facts are not only in error but are also engaged in a conspiracy to pervert truth and presumably justice. The BBC also chimes in with an article claiming piously, “there is no evidence to support the implication vaccines might be involved”.

At the ‘heart’ of these claims is the suggestion that vaccine-induced myocarditis is rare, so rare that it could not possibly be causing the huge rate of excess deaths from heart disease which amounts, according to the British Heart Foundation, to a massive 30,000 extra UK deaths per year when compared to pre-pandemic levels.

At the same time as Bronny James was suffering a tragic heart attack and its aftermath, Swiss scientists finalised a scientific paper for publication entitled “Sex specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination”. This is a landmark study because it is a gold standard, carefully-planned, prospective study with a rigorous schedule of tests rather than an incomplete retrospective assessment of past events.

777 health care workers were tested for myocardial damage three days after booster vaccination and compared to the same number of controls. 40 of them (1 in 20) had elevated troponin levels indicative of damage to cardiac cells. These people (65% of them women) were subject to follow up tests and 22 of them (1 in 35) were judged to have vaccine-induced myocardial injury. This careful study proves that myocardial injury has been massively underreported. The Mail reports that the UK Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) had previously estimated a rate of just 1 in 666. Now known to be wrong by a factor of 20.

By no stretch of the imagination can myocardial injury be judged to be ‘extremely rare’ as the Mail suggests. Nor, according to this detailed discussion by Dr. John Campbell is this level of risk something any of us would consider taking on unless we faced imminent death as an alternative, which we don’t. For another discussion see this informative substack article.

Fortunately, the short term effects among those tested in the Swiss study did not include severe outcomes, but another prospective study completed in 2022 in Thailand on 314 high school students did find such severe effects. It is well known that myocarditis has both short term and long term outcomes. The elevated rate of excess deaths from heart disease in the general population does point to the need to ask questions. Asking them publicly does not amount to a conspiracy. The dismissal of these claims suggests there is an attempt to cover up on the part of the same doctors who coerced us to take the jabs and told us they were effective and safe (they aren’t).

Other causal factors for the steep rise in excess deaths from heart disease suggested by the Mail include the rise in ambulance response times to cardiac incidents from 30 to 90 minutes. It is surely not too hard for the newspaper to realise that if there are more cardiac events there will be longer response times, not the other way around. Another suggestion widely touted until recently was a supposed failure to prescribe statins during the pandemic, this disappeared from newsprint pages when it was realised that statin prescriptions have actually not decreased.

If you want to know just how convoluted denial of responsibility can become, read a translation of an article from Sweden where a 30 year old man died after receiving a booster jab. The government paid his family financial compensation but listed the event as the result of a medicine given in error rather than suffer the embarrassment of calling it a vaccine related death. A paper analysing autopsy results following Covid vaccination underlines the intended obfuscation of this kind of doublespeak.

Behind this posturing and denial of responsibility lies something much darker with more chilling implications for public health. It is not just heart attacks that are up to levels never seen before. Ditto for cancers, kidney injury, neurological injury, strokes, miscarriages, menstrual irregularities, stillbirths, cognitive decline and crucially unexplained deaths.

These statistics point to the need for probing questions of a different type. Are the vaccines or indeed Covid infection, which the balance of evidence now suggests both came from a biotech lab, causing generalised immune instability and more worryingly, how long is this going to go on, and how bad will it get?

Sometimes you find that you have to face up to extreme challenges in your personal life. Our responses to these crises define who we are and what we can become. This can require admitting to ourselves and others that we got it all wrong. Apology and humility build character and support honesty.

Crises can also engulf the whole of society. The casual dismissal of questions about vaccine safety shows we have arrived at just such a societal crisis. A crisis of health and truth whose dimensions appear to dwarf anything civilisation as a whole has had to face in our lifetimes. The beginnings of this crisis are no doubt lost in history, but the turning point came when some decision-makers in the pharmaceutical industry at the start of the pandemic decided it would be safe to unleash biotechnology on the general public. We are just at the beginning of this era. The WHO 2030 Agenda predicts that we will all be subject to hundreds of novel vaccines within the decade.

Biotechnology medicine was well known to be unsafe and inherently mutagenic pre-pandemic. Crucially it wasn’t so much what we knew, but what we didn’t know that constituted the colossal error of judgement, hubris, cruelty and greed. A single cell, the origin of life, contains an uncountable 100 trillion atoms organised into 42 million protein molecules and twenty thousand genes. Scientists have only a vague picture of how cells work. They have no idea how cells produce consciousness, how cells join together (37.2 trillion of them) to form a single human identity with amazing autonomic functions and immunity.

What we thought they knew can only be described as a crude notion put together from a few isolated facts derived from a countable number of experiments. Scientists don’t understand how intra-cellular transport and selection is managed. They only have a hazy comprehension of the role of electric fields, molecular shape, vibrational modes, so-called dark areas of our genome and multi-gene cooperative functions.

What we do know for certain is the immense precision involved and the vulnerability to even very small edits to their structure. Cells work very hard to protect this precision, each one completes over 70,000 self-repairs every day. With this in mind, it becomes very apparent that those working in the field of gene therapy knew from previous failures and disasters just how potentially dangerous Covid vaccines could be. Some did warn their superiors, who not only ignored them but set about telling the general public that that biotechnology was completely safe and near 100% infallible. This was a big lie, not to say the crime of the century.

As you no doubt know very well, once you have told one lie, it is very hard to avoid telling more lies which can eventually become a world of untruth that eats away at your conscience and peace. This has become the fate of society during the pandemic. No one is participating more enthusiastically than the fourth estate. Everyday, newspapers print articles claiming that excess deaths, which are running into millions world wide, are normal or non-existent and have nothing to do with the obvious culprit. Governments are looking the other way and piously washing their hands of the matter like Pontius Pilate, while medical authorities are busying themselves hiding the data and refusing to carry out tests and autopsies.

The new generation of biotech medicines are squarely aimed at editing the internal operation of cells, the control system that keeps our physiology and our life flying safely along. It shouldn’t be a surprise to learn that handicapping the pilot might crash the plane. The only surprise is that millions of crashed planes world wide are being ignored. We are living in a very different world from the one we thought we inhabited. I hope we are not so daft that we stop asking questions on the advice of those manifestly profiting from the pandemic.

After reporting earlier that there have been 100,000 extra UK deaths from heart disease alone, the Mail concludes by claiming without evidence that the number of vaccine-related deaths pales in comparison to the estimated 230,000 deaths that Covid inoculation has supposedly saved (???)—a figure widely disputed and believed to be wildly inflated. Even so 2 to 5 are not odds that I would accept if I had to put my life up as collateral, would you?

Articles like those today in the Daily Mail and the BBC, and there are many of them published everyday, are not just bad journalism, they are part of an insidious push to promote drugs that are known to harm people. They are intended to quiet the concern of people worldwide who are waking up to their tragic side effects and complete ineffectiveness. The purpose is manifestly the inflation of the profits of a trillion dollar industry who has proved itself callous and criminal, unfit to dominate public health policy as they do through revolving doors between regulators and industry insiders and through obscene advertising expenditure and gifts to medical professionals.

Image Credits

Photo by Chris on Unsplash

A Turning Point in Our Nation: The Sentencing of Billy Tk Jnr. And Vinny Eastwood to Jail

0

Yesterday I was interviewed on a US radio channel jointly with Billy Te Kahika Jnr. and Vinny Eastwood. I realised I have been remiss. I have not publicly discussed their case here in New Zealand, whose outcome will materially affect our future rights and treatment under the law. I want to rectify that now.

Mr. Te Kahika, a pastor and former serving soldier and policeman, and Mr Eastwood, a social commentator and radio personality, have been sentenced to four months and three months jail time, respectively, for participating in a peaceful, non-violent protest against level 4 lockdowns. Their case comes up for appeal against sentencing on the morning of Monday, 31st July. They have both been subject to persistent unfavourable comment in mainstream media, unreasonably impugning their character and intentions.

It is very hard not to think that they may have both been sentenced to jail in order to make an example of them and send a message to the whole nation. If this was the case, it would have been the hallmark of a repressive regime.

The wheels of justice turn slowly for a reason, it enables the judicial system to place offences in the context of subsequent events. It has been two years since the apparent offence. Since that time, it has become known that lockdowns damaged our economy and disadvantaged the education of youth. They signalled the beginning of an era of high youth crime rates, too high, in fact, for the police and courts to contain or mitigate.

It is also apparent that lockdowns and other pandemic policies ultimately proved ineffective at reducing the level of casualties and deaths. For example, this article discusses that both Sweden, who didn’t lock down, and Israel, who did had similar long term health outcomes.

Mr. Te Kahika and Eastwood are appealing their sentence. They note that no other persons have been handed jail time for offences of this type committed in New Zealand. In contrast to their treatment, a great many people participating in protests during the pandemic have been arrested and released without charge, conviction, or punishment. This was just.

There are very important points of law at stake here that affect our rights as New Zealanders.

The law is supposed to be fair. Laws should be applied equally, without prejudice or inequality. In the English legal system, from which our laws are originally derived, the role of the judiciary was considered to include the defence of fairness. In the early 1970s I heard Lord Justice Denning, Master of the Rolls, enunciate this concept at Birkbeck College in London. His words made a great impression on me. He said the judicial system:

 “should uphold what right-thinking men know to be fair between man and man, and in these days between man and the state.”

He emphasised the need for the courts to think rightly and fairly in passing judgement. He thought the judiciary should play a role in curbing any excesses of the State. He recognised that a government, even though it is democratically elected at some point in time, must not lose sight of the rights of its individual members. If it did, it is right and proper for the courts to issue judgements reflecting a fair application of universal principles of justice.

In New Zealand, we have a principle of the supremacy of Parliament to make laws, but we also have a Bill of Rights. Provisions 13 to 18 of the Bill of Rights grant freedom of thought, conscience and religion. They also grant freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, association, and movement. Provision 6 states:

“Wherever an enactment can be given a meaning that is consistent with the rights and freedoms contained in this Bill of Rights, that meaning shall be preferred to any other meaning.”

The concepts of law and government in ancient Greece were thought to be derived from natural laws. In this philosophy of justice, natural laws, such as the laws of physics etc. were seen to be equally applied to all but also applied in such a way that everyone was nourished by them. In the affairs of state, it is the role of leaders to balance the social interest and the individual interest. Democracy is supposed to offer an opportunity for all to contribute and participate, it is not and never has been understood as a system of repressive control.

In retrospect, the measures taken during the pandemic, including lockdowns, may have been well intentioned, but their net outcomes were extremely unbalanced. A fact that was admitted by the Prime Minister at the time, who spoke of the intention to create a two-tiered society. It is even more clear now that this was a mistake, it was divisive, ultimately ineffective, and damaging. From this point of view, with the wisdom of hindsight, Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika can be legitimately understood to be justly seeking to protect the integrity of our nation rather than undermining it. They sought to support our democratic society.

Last week we witnessed with horror the murder of individuals and the shooting of policemen in central Auckland. We now know that the perpetrator was under home detention for very violent offences committed against his whanau. During this detention, he was also allowed the freedom to attend work. Contrast this with the current jail sentences against Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika for minor actions that do not involve any violence.

We also heard that our Justice Minister Kiri Allan had been arrested for drunk driving and failing to follow the instructions of a police officer after an accident. She fled the scene of the accident. This provokes us to recognise that the elected government can be fallible. When it is, it is the role of the courts to inject balance into the public debate.

I sincerely hope that Monday’s hearing of appeal finds in favour of the applicants. I believe justice served in this case could be a turning point in our nation and a way of healing the divisions that have grown up during the turbulent and uncertain years of the pandemic. I believe that an appropriate decision by the court on Monday could go some way towards restoring the effect of the provisions of our Bill of Rights, which were bypassed to a considerable, and I believe unreasonable extent during the pandemic.

It is a great misfortune of the forthcoming election that none of our currently elected political parties have talked about the need to entrench the Bill of Rights as a constitutional principle. Doing so would ensure balance between the rights of the individual and the power of the State. It would protect the people from ill-considered overreach by the government.

I am asking for people to voice their support for Mr. Eastwood and Mr. Te Kahika. It is surprising how little the media has published the concerns we raise here, rather choosing to denigrate the defendants, despite the fact that the judgements, in this case, affect everyone’s rights in NewZealand for the future. They are both family men of hitherto good behaviour who would suffer greatly if jailed. The emotional and material cost of their defence has been substantial. In particular, Mr. Te Kahika has personally spent $97,000 on legal costs so far (an amount beyond his modest means) and needs more financial support to continue his defence and pay outstanding bills. I believe that support for the defendants is in every New Zealander’s interest. To make arrangements to contact and support the defendants:

Email of Billy Te Kahika Jnr. <billy@ibc.net.nz>

A/c Mr W Te Kahika Bank account: 02 – 1245 – 0777955 – 001

Email of Vincent Eastwood <guerillamrnews@gmail.com>

https://www.thevinnyeastwoodshow.com/donate.html

They are ready to provide verification of their costs and expenses.

You can view a documentary about their arrest here and sign a petition here

Something is Happening, But What? RNZ Wants Us to Fantasize About It

On Saturday, the UK Daily Express headlined a story, “Experts call for urgent investigation as excess deaths spark ‘dangerous’ theories“. UK excess deaths in 2023 have risen to levels commensurate with 2020 alpha variant deaths during the height of the pandemic, but the article admits that the 2023 excess is not due to Covid. Most concerning is the death toll in the 15-44 age group, which exceeds 2020 and prior years. An age group which was mostly just mildly affected by Covid.

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

As they are here in New Zealand, where our rates of excess death are measurably higher than in the UK, the Government is keeping quiet and looking the other way. Dr. Charles Levinson, Medical Director of private GP service Doctorcall, said the “silence” from the Government was allowing conspiracy theories to flourish, including from anti-vaxxers, and added:

A refusal to openly discuss these statistics is an abdication of responsibility from parts of the scientific community [and the government], leading to an irreversible erosion of trust by parts of society.” We agree.

Why Aren’t Governments Investigating?

So we are not conspiracy theorists when we warn that excess deaths are up, mainstream scientists agree with us, but understandably they don’t want the jabs they administered and pushed on people to be revealed as the cause or even openly discussed. That could be very embarrassing.

Why aren’t governments investigating? It might be a fair guess at this point to suggest that governments are actually aware of excess deaths and very afraid to investigate because what limited data they have released suggests very clearly that those asking questions about vaccine safety might very well be right about the cause.

Excess deaths appear to be clustered around a range of cardiac events scientifically proven and acknowledged to be related to mRNA vaccines and cancers suspected to be. The Boston Globe, for example, headlines, “Rise in cancer among younger people worries and puzzles doctors“. Indian doctor Feruzi Mehta from Mumbai tweets that heart attack deaths among younger people now make up 15-20% of the total, when it was just 1-2% ten years ago.

Doctors like Mehta speaking up are risking de-registration. Therefore most others, faced by rising incidence of illness and death, especially among the young, are remaining silent. However, some diehards are doubling down or even succumbing to the irrational.

Silence is one thing, but our Prime Minister’s office is actively funding a disinformation project dedicated to discrediting anyone who asks questions about vaccine safety, labelling them violent extremists, paedophiles, satanists, anti-semites, animal torturers, white supremacists, neo-Nazis, and anti-transgender. Saying that “all these interests ultimately merge into one”, beginning with a concern about vaccine mandates (???)

Time to Press the Pause Button

All the wild and incredible accusations listed in the preceding paragraph are explicitly made during the first 12 minutes of the first episode of a seven-part podcast series produced by RNZ called Undercurrent, in which they interview government-funded disinformation experts (???). 12 minutes of this half-baked smear campaign was enough exposure for me to press the pause button.

The problem with the RNZ podcast so far (aside from its lengthy episodes and unrelenting madness) is that it doesn’t actually discuss vaccine injuries or unprecedented rates of excess deaths (or even mention that there are such things). RNZ began putting the podcast series together more than 10 months ago. Since that time, it has become apparent that worrying excess death rates have persisted, but RNZ has apparently decided to avoid mentioning the problem. There is a possible reason for this. Once you get into inventing causes of excess deaths, you really do begin to sound very mad indeed.

Talking of Madness…

One News tweeted tonight that people in Mount Maunganui are dying of air pollution in large numbers, along with a picture of its pristine coastline.

The NY Times suggests that extreme heat is causing hundreds of extra deaths. It advises July 20, 2023 “….plan to stay indoors as much as possible with the windows closed. If you must be outdoors, consider wearing an N95 mask…” A lot of people appear to be taking this advice very seriously, one tweets despairingly:

“….I have Covid now. I haven’t been anywhere in a month. We both mask indoors and we don’t even share a bedroom or eat in the same room. No choice but to share a bathroom.”

In 2017 the NY Times wrote in praise of sunshine, saying it has massive benefits, crowing, “let the sun shine in”. Recently in 2023, the NY Times wrote, “How to Get Absolutely No Sun This Summer. None! Don’t even think about it!“.

Alex Berenson, award winning former NYT journalist, responds to this kind of reporting with “The New York Times has lost its mind. And by mind, I mean principles and understanding of the First Amendment (the right to free speech).” In which he says the NYT has walked into the government censorship trap, cancelling those voicing concerns, including himself.

A quick survey of other suggested causes of record excess deaths suggested by mainstream media ranges from the just possible marginal effect of lockdowns to the implausible alcohol consumption, loneliness, too much exercise, gardening, vacations, climate change, and the really far out: ‘there is too much air’. You can feel the panic setting in, can’t you? Something terrible is happening, but people are very afraid to face up to it.

Pro-vaccine advocate Prof. Peter Hotez is also recommending staying at home. He is warning against going to see the blockbuster Barbie or Oppenheimer movies at the cinema because you might bring Covid home with you. Incredibly he also joins with RNZ in thinking that concern about vaccine safety is a form of anti-semitism.

The Lack of Any Plausible Explanation

It doesn’t take much thought to realise that the underlying concern here is the increasingly noticeable high rate of excess deaths and the lack of any plausible explanation. All this is happening after mass vaccinations with a novel biotechnology drug. How long are we going to go on without acknowledging the elephant in the corner of the room or, more especially, tabulating how many among those dying are vaccinated or unvaccinated?

The government-backed RNZ podcast is an act of desperation which is transparently biased and illogical, aimed at a demographic that has been systematically schooled over the last three years to unquestioning dream-like acceptance of the government and the medical establishment. This might be very comforting to some who are just blindly hoping it will all go away or else feeling grateful there is a scapegoat they can blame and revile, but this narrative no longer makes any sense, if it ever did. The RNZ podcast should be dismissed as absurd propaganda issued during the last days of a failed parliament.

Just remember the paragraph with which we started this article.

Scientists are now warning us that excess deaths are real and very concerning, not imaginary as our politicians and some uninformed medicos and media hacks are still pressing us to accept, against the evidence.

We are facing a real life emergency. Our EDs and hospitals are overwhelmed. Young people are dying of conditions that used to mainly affect the elderly, but the media, the government, and the medical establishment want the subject to remain taboo. They are funding efforts to marginalise those asking questions, shooting the messenger rather than acknowledging the problem and searching for solutions. Time to wake up from the fantasy.

While You Were Sleeping….

Under urgency, the government has passed the Therapeutic Products Bill while we were distracted by the world cup and the violent events in Auckland. Why?

This article is available as a PDF document, or you can listen to it here.

The bill mandates that all products claiming to benefit your health will have to be approved by government-appointed regulators. The same regulators who rubber stamped disastrous pandemic policies. Despite presenting no evidence that natural products are dangerous to health, Labour and the Greens have pressed ahead to gain total control over our health choices in an extraordinary extension of their power over our daily lives (read what the natural health products industry says about it here and weep).

It would be an understatement to say my family is disappointed and disgusted about this. Considering how many health benefits we have enjoyed over the years from natural products, many of which we grow in our own garden, our comments around the breakfast table this morning are unprintable. It led us to reflect on the processes that are guiding us to an almost unimaginable future.

Fear has become a weapon that is being used to manipulate us. Whether it is fear of climate change, fear of disease and death, fear of war, fear of poverty, or even fear of speaking freely, they are being deceptively used to change our habits for the worst in every sphere of our lives. Yet the outcomes most desired by those leading the way do not appear to be solutions but profit and power.

Fear is the Mindkiller

As Frank Herbert said, ‘fear is the mindkiller’. A whisper of some new disease and you must buy a new drug, whether proven useful or proven dangerous, or simply unproven. Stoking fear is enough to ensure compliant acceptance. Ditto for new foods, fads, cars, weapons, and you name it.

Now firmly in the hands of government regulators, our future is destined to be shrouded in pharmacology. We are already surrounded by government approved vape shops promoting harmful chemicals being used by all and sundry, including primary kids, oblivious to the addictive and devastating consequences.

Meanwhile, government regulators are proposing restrictive regulation of cinnamon, vitamin C, B12, and hundreds of other natural products and herbs known to be not just beneficial but essential for health.

As our politicians pretend they are inclusive and we are not, their actions are undermining our centuries old cultural heritage of herbal lore, Mātauranga Māori, traditional Chinese and Indian medicine. More than fifty percent of us use natural health products. Now they are denying us a right to choose freely. How dare Parliament bid to stop us!!

The provisions of the Therapeutic Products Bill are part and parcel of a process known as global harmonisation. In a highly regulated world, when we are all subject to the same stringent rules, only those mega corporations with a global reach will be well placed to profit with their mass produced unhealthy chemical and biotech alternatives. The mega corporations are the ones making the rules to suit themselves and fear is their weapon of choice.

Dr. Josef Mengele working in Auschwitz selected over 1000 twins for his sadistic and deadly experiments. The reason we know so much about Mengele’s crimes is that he was intensely interested in the results of his experiments which he documented in detail. I am not interested in drawing a parallel here between anything Dr Mengele did and what is happening now, but rather to highlight the obvious differences.

In our globalised world, whatever experiments are being designed in hidden laboratories are not affecting thousands but billions of individuals. The true horror of our present circumstances is revealed when we realise that the experimenters are not interested in documenting the outcomes, but merely harvesting the profit and the power. Meaning the true extent of their crimes will never be known.

We and many others have repeatedly requested the government and the medical authorities to document and publish the outcomes of pandemic policies and interventions, but instead, they are assiduously ignoring or hiding the data. See here or watch here. The evidence is overwhelming and its omission from public debate is criminal.

However, there is one respect in which the two circumstances, 80 years apart, seem strikingly similar. After the war, Dr. Mengele escaped and was never brought to justice. After the pandemic, the chief perpetrators have escaped accountability, they are being lauded as heroes. The reason this is happening is the total control that powerful interests in government, the media, and big pharma are able to wield over public narratives.

We are going to the polls this year. Reflect that democracy, which is supposed to mean participation of all the people, has come to mean control of all the people. There is no need for governments to control what we eat or what we do to further our health. If we continue to sleep through successive legislative initiatives to bind us in chains, the horrific outcomes of global experimentation will never be controlled and cleaned up.

Provisions in the Therapeutic Products Bill are designed to facilitate novel medicine, not protect the public. These provisions have been carefully crafted with the input of global commercial interests so that traditional means to maintain health that work through nutritional supplementation using natural materials will be hobbled or banned by regulation. This is designed to open the door to domination by mass-produced experimental biotechnology including novel foods.

Whatever is happening now is unsustainable, harmful, and unintelligent, if we continue to sleep through it, a time will come when we may never be able to wake up. Make no mistake about it, biotechnology experimentation is the ultimate destructive weapon that affects everyone without discrimination and can never be recalled.

Your ability to access natural health products is at risk.

Contact your MP to express your outrage. Demand that the Therapeutic Products Bill be repealed.

Members of Parliament contact details.

To read more about the global effects of regulation of natural health products read my book Your DNA Diet or view our YouTube video An Open Message To Parliament. Why Are They Regulating Natural Health Products?

Open Letter To Dr. Shane Reti, National Party Spokesperson on Health

0

Dear Dr. Reti

I would like to commend your efforts over the last three months to accompany ambulance staff up and down the country as they work to bring patients into ED at all times of the day and night. Your diligence exemplifies the need for more MPs to understand problems firsthand and talk to those on the frontline.

I note your comment reported by the Herald “I have never seen an ED that busy”. As a result, you say you are committed to providing needed tools and resources to first responders and ED staff, something we all wholeheartedly support.

The NZ Herald today reports your challenge to the sitting Health Minister, the Hon. Dr. Ayesha Verrall, regarding the release of ED data, including waiting times. Dr. Verrall has had to apologise to Parliament for incorrectly stating her department had not delayed the release of some of this data.

Your comments and actions suggest you have become more aware during the last few months of the extent of the health crisis facing the nation. I regularly receive reports from correspondents around New Zealand, many of whom work in the health services, of the increased volumes of illness in many categories particularly including cardiac illness and cancers.

It is clear from some Wellington Region health data leaked to myself that the volume of cases in many categories of illness has increased markedly and remains high (including an 83% increase in cardiac admissions). These increases appear to be both large and unprecedented. There will be a number of factors contributing to these rises possibly due in part, as you have suggested, to under-resourcing and delays associated with the peak in pandemic cases. However, the volumes we are continuing to experience appear to far exceed the impact of these factors.

It seems to me that ED data is not the only area of concern that the health services have delayed releasing to ministers and the public. Information about volumes and outcomes of specific categories of illness have also been delayed. As a doctor, I am sure you will agree that information of this type is critical when designing response and resourcing strategies. I note this recent Herald article, “‘Very disturbing’ wait times of up to 18 months for cardiac scans” for example.

As a researcher, I am fully aware of the need to study the detailed specifics of the health crisis in order to identify the causal factors. Two days ago, I wrote urging the government to:

“…record vax status on death certificates and compare the death rate of the unvaccinated to the vaccinated. Governments and medical authorities have done the opposite, they have failed to publish this data. Now why would they do that? By hiding information, are they protecting democracy or undermining it? Are they using or misusing science? Are they serving the public or deceiving them?”

I am perplexed as to why the government is continuing to heavily promote Covid vaccination, when specific evidence of its outcomes is being delayed or hidden.

I am writing to you to ask if you can formally request detailed information of this type? If, as you have often suggested, the Covid vaccines have been largely safe, this data will lend support to your views. If the opposite is the case, there are important lessons to learn which directly affect the health of individuals. In either case, it is extremely important that accurate and complete data informs government policy and medical advice.

As you are no doubt aware, there is a continuing controversy about the rate of excess deaths and hospitalisations. I am disturbed that this subject has become a political football, with much uninformed and prejudicial comment. The analysis is not being approached scientifically. Your trips with first responders and visits to EDs have no doubt raised some doubts about the authenticity of some media and public commentary.

I am greatly in favour of informed public comment. Your recent ED visits and questions in parliament have served the public interest. As I live in the Whangarei locality, I would welcome an opportunity to personally discuss my concerns about these matters with you. Otherwise, can your probing questions in parliament and public comments begin to fully reflect the wider picture of concerning New Zealand health data? I consider this to be a most urgent matter, a matter of life and death. I trust you do also.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD