The British Heart Foundation (BHF) has announced that the incidence of atrial fibrillation has increased by 50% over the last decade. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a condition which causes an irregular and often rapid heart rate. It can lead to stroke and heart failure. The BHF did not release any supporting figures by year which might point to a potential cause. Watch Dr. John Campbell describing as ‘astonishing’, both the huge rise in AF and the lack of detailed data.

Here in New Zealand heart disease is at record levels, but politicians of all parties are repeating again and again, along with their expert Dr. Michael Baker, that there are no excess deaths. As if repeating a lie will be enough to make it come true. However, the official tally of OECD statistics shows that in 2023 New Zealand deaths are running at an astonishing 18.2% above the long term average. The second highest rate among 31 OECD nations.

This doesn’t appear to matter one whit to our politicians who remain confident they are one source of truth, fully in control of mainstream media, backed by the medical establishment, able to censor social media, protected from the courts by parliamentary privilege, and not required to answer any questions.

It probably hasn’t escaped your notice that all these are recognised characteristics of cult leaders who systematically manipulate their followers and seek to exercise total control. To say that cults do not end well would be an understatement. Once your followers are sufficiently prepped to ignore fact, any crooked and perverted manipulation becomes a possibility.

Once indoctrinated, it is difficult to persuade cult followers they have been duped. Leaders ensure that every event that runs counter to their ideology is neatly fitted into their world view whether based on fact or not. It becomes especially damaging when the force of law is used to ensure compliance and eliminate redress.

You can hardly avoid news of sudden onset illness or unexpected deaths in the daily newspapers or among friends, but there is always an innocuous sounding cause on offer. If considered rationally, the unprecedented number of unusual deaths would render these excuses implausible. However, cults don’t do rational.

Quietly Disaster Has Been Creeping Up on Us

This brings us to a rather sad realisation—with all the elected political parties complicit in Covid policy, it is almost ludicrous to believe that the coming election will change anything. Prepandemic, our current situation was almost inconceivable, but quietly disaster has been creeping up on us.

Published in 2020, an article in Harvard University Health Publishing gives us a hint. Senior Editor Robert Shmerling argues that it is not possible or even practical as a medical practitioner to be guided by “to do no harm” as the Hippocratic oath suggests, instead saying:

You can’t tell ahead of time whether a test or treatment will ‘do no harm’.

In other words, it has become widely accepted in medical practice that adverse events are inevitable and unpredictable. This is an argument that seeks to justify the irresponsible push for risky and dangerous biotech medicine and experimentation at any cost.

So what will change minds? When you look at Ponzi schemes, dictators, and cults, the answer is always the same. They end when total disaster strikes. Just how high will excess deaths have to rise before the powers that be accept that a giant mistake has been made?

Inside the Covid cult there are a few cracks appearing in the safe and effective narrative. It has quietly become acceptable for doctors to privately advise their patients that they might be vaccine injured, for pathologists to advise the children of friends that they should avoid Covid vaccination, for vaccinologists to say they won’t be getting any more boosters. These are small steps that indicate a direction of change, they also indicate that those at the health frontline know that something has gone radically wrong.

However, the political and media endorsement of biotechnology remains near total. Given the weight of Covid science publishing, there is no justification for this.

The suggestion that New Zealand’s pandemic policy has been world beating is a hollow lie, pandering to notions of national pride and allegiance. Like the medicos who think it is impossible to “to do no harm”, politicians are actually denying the obvious. By doing so they are tacitly endorsing inevitable deaths in the course of policy. This is a very militaristic, self-obsessed, and flawed way to think—glorious sacrifice—“Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die”.

Pandemic policy has stolen our bodily autonomy and our right to medical choice. It has overruled nature’s design of immunity and health. It has debased truth, substituting government pronouncement. It has seized control of children from families and whanau. It has inserted propaganda into education. It has rendered employees subservient. It has cancelled dialogue.

In short, it has taken the world in which we thought we lived and turned it upside down. It is no good thinking this is a battle between right and left. That too is a story to keep everyone distracted from the real issues. It is a question of what kind of fundamental individual rights can we retain? Rights that we previously took for granted.

By framing the world as vaccinated vs unvaccinated, political power backed by pharmaceutical money has redrawn ideological boundaries along the lines of novel biotechnologies. This is a giant act of deception that completely ignores the transhumanism involved.

When I was growing up, we gave thanks for the harvest. The modern age has joined in the cult of biotechnology, this seems to offer supremacy over nature, but it hasn’t worked. To succeed, to know, to enjoy you have to work with nature.

The hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program. Which means that if you choose to buy the book mentioned in the next paragraph, we may recieve a small commission at not extra cost to you.

I have just finished reading “The History of the World in 100 Plants” by Simon Barnes. Barnes concludes: we are descended from the biodiversity and bioabundance of plants. “Look at this planet and its uncountable plants. We owe them everything”. Taittiriya Upanishad confirms “life-breath is indeed food.” We depend entirely on the natural world around us, yet biotechnology is seeking to overthrow this mutual interdependency and substitute a ephemeral figment of man’s imagination and pride—an impossible dream and a hideous nightmare that puts our continued existence at risk.

Voting for today’s crop of politicians is a forlorn hope, it is a blank check for continued biotechnology experimentation on ourselves. It is a licence to adulterate our traditional food sources and place them in the hands of unscrupulous biotechnology megacorporations.

There may be ways to restore individual health. Plants are our evolutionary forebears. They supported and helped create the genetic stability that we have enjoyed until today, hopefully, their intelligent use through diet and herbal traditions can help restore public health. A precondition of progress is the recognition of mistakes, the cessation of biotech vaccines for humans and animals, renewed protections of pure natural foods, and a recognition of their role in maintaining health.

This is not a time to give up our rights, and hand them to the same politicians who have already laughed at medical choice and mocked those suffering serious adverse events, who have run roughshod over our Bill of Rights. They don’t deserve our vote. Under their leadership it could all begin again.

A study of data from 1.5 million subjects in the US healthcare system reveals an increased risk of blindness over two years following mRNA vaccination.

Updated: 6:00 PM 22 May 2023

Fortunately, many people are waking up to a multi-billion dollar web of self-interest promoted by our government, the health establishment, the pharmaceutical/biotech industry, and legacy media…. but not everyone. True to form, the NZ Herald this morning leads with a lament, apparently only a minority of eligible New Zealanders have risked taking the bivalent vaccine.

In support of its call to vaccinate yet again, the Herald article cites a study published by Cambridge University Press which looks at “Inequities in COVID-19 Omicron infections and hospitalisations for Māori and Pacific people in Te Manawa Taki Midland region, New Zealand”. A close look at the study reveals now familiar deficiencies that we have discussed in the pages of the Hatchard Report before:

• As expected, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is anyone who is actually unvaccinated + anyone who had a single dose. The paper should be tossed in the bin for this alone.
• The paper doesn’t specify whether or not they consider someone vaccinated in the first week after receiving their shot, but probably they are using Ministry of Health definitions which discard the crucial first week of data following mRNA vaccination thereby omitting adverse outcomes.
• Many people were admitted to hospital for causes unrelated to Covid between February and May but still tested positive. This factor was only removed in early July when they started filtering for unrelated morbidities.
• The study data time frame was February to June 2022. This was an interesting period. ‘Efficacy’ against Covid hospitalisation and mortality started in favour of boosters, but crossed over by May as the vaccine efficacy wore off and then entered negative territory. In other words, after May 2022 boosted individuals had a higher chance of Covid infection and death than the unvaccinated. The study would have got a very different set of results if they had considered May-September as well or instead.

If you take a broad sample of recently published research, it seems avoiding repeated Covid vaccination could be a very significant and safe choice.

Increased Risk of Blindness Over Two Years Following mRNA Vaccination

A very large and carefully specified study published in prestigious journal Nature of US healthcare data involving 1.5 million subjects has found that your risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) doubles within the two years following Covid vaccination when compared to unvaccinated individuals (see here for a detailed explanation of the study findings by Dr. Mobeen Syed).

The results are especially alarming because all categories of people whose health history and drug use might lead to a propensity to suffer from RVO were excluded from the study. The two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and previous hospitalisation. In other words, the results point very clearly to a doubling of risk for those receiving mRNA vaccines.

The retina is the layer of tissue at the back of the inner eye that converts light images to nerve signals and sends them to the brain. Retinal vein occlusion is a blockage of the small veins that carry blood away from the retina. It is most often caused by the formation of a blood clot which blocks the flow of blood through the retina and causes severe damage to the blood vessels and the retina itself.

Retinal vascular occlusion involves the loss of sight in the affected eye; in simple terms it leads to blindness. Many people suffering from retinal vascular occlusion do regain some vision naturally. However, vision rarely returns to normal. There is no known intervention to reverse or open retinal vascular blockages. Older people are especially vulnerable to retinal vascular occlusion, the same people our government and Te Whatu Ora are vigorously targeting to take another Covid shot.

It seems Te Whatu Ora is suffering from selective blindness itself. It is so keen to promote its vaccine uptake strategy, that it is not keeping up to date with the increasingly long list of concerning mRNA Covid vaccine adverse effect studies, and certainly not informing the public about these risks.

So What Sort of Blood Clots Develop as a Result of mRNA Vaccination, and How Do They Form?

Considering that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes has increased dramatically, you would think that funded research could prioritise research in this area, but in the post Covid vaccine era, you would of course be wrong. Everyone involved with promoting biotech vaccines is busy looking the other way.

This article contains microscopy photos of unusual blood clots found in the arteries of suddenly deceased individuals. They contain relatively large fibrous, crystalline, and wire-like structures, not the cellular agglomerations of typical blood clots. These cannot normally be observed until autopsies are performed. Micro clots are another type of risk.

The retinal vascular occlusion study suggests mechanisms for micro clot formation, including molecular mimicry of the Spike-protein and/or heparin suppression. Heparin is the factor which prevents platelet aggregation or micro clotting. The retinal arteries and veins are unusual in as much as small pathogenic micro clots forming in the blood can be directly observed in the eye. Moreover, their effects are immediately apparent to the patient and the treating physician. This opens a possible window into the study of the formation of blood clots following mRNA vaccination and their treatment.

Increasingly the New Zealand government’s Covid policy looks blinkered, defensive, and deceptive. Last week, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) released a tender for a major contract to provide ‘insights to build an empirical picture of the disinformation landscape.’ The newly appointed disinformation Tsar (at a cost of $450,000), whoever they are, will do well to look into the government itself. It might have become the principal source of misinformation in the nation.

According to Mintel, which styles itself as the world’s leading Market Intelligence agency, 2023 is the year of “hyperfatigue”—a state of continual physical, emotional and mental exhaustion. In a recent UK survey, 35% of people said they were too tired to make healthy changes to their diet and activity levels, suggesting many are in a vicious circle of fatigue-induced self-sabotage, leading to more fatigue.

Cancer Research UK, estimates that 40% of all cases of cancer could be avoided if more people lived healthier lives, for example by eating more healthily, being active, maintaining a normal weight, avoiding sunburn and not smoking, but we’re not taking their advice. Basically, we’re too tired to tackle our tiredness.

So what has made 2023 so unusually fatigued? Might it have something to do with an infectious disease almost certainly created in a laboratory possibly as part of a bioweapon development programme along with a misnamed vaccine, also created in a biolab, that doesn’t work and appears to make people sick? You tell me.

There are an increasing number of unwell people suffering from conditions which studies show might be caused or complicated by mRNA vaccination, but the government is keeping quiet and relying on hyperfatigue and its own one source of truth doctrine to prevent people looking any deeper. We recently heard from a young acquaintance who informed us of their heart disease diagnosis. They remained not just uninformed of the possible cause, but also reassured by government advertising that Covid vaccines are safe.

You don’t have to look very far for a cause these days. A Japanese paper published last week outlines the case of a man who developed myocarditis immediately after the administration of his fifth shot. Hospitalisations are at record levels, our health system is under siege, …..and winter is coming.

Corrected and updated: 14 May 2023

We have arrived at a point in an election year when our votes matter, so expect some surprising replies to our emails and even some answers to our questions. BUT, if today was anything to go by, it won’t be without fireworks.

Yesterday, I fact checked David Seymour, who, in his Reality Check Radio interview, had asserted very strongly that New Zealand has had no excess deaths. I used the statistical graphical interface from the Human Mortality Database run by the University of California and the Max Planck Institute in Germany to generate charts to illustrate Seymour’s misunderstanding. This interface queried the same official data as Our World in Data referred to by David Seymour.

Once you factor in the absence of seasonal flu in 2021, these charts illustrate very clearly that New Zealand has had elevated rising rates of excess deaths beginning in 2021 and continuing since.

Clinging to Total Lunacy

However, David Seymour and Rachel Beauchamp, his Executive Assistant, wrote to a number of correspondents this morning (12 May) rejecting the information I posted. David stood by his assessment that deaths in New Zealand were below historical averages. In fact, a little bit more than that, David said that anyone who clings to the idea that mRNA vaccines killed anyone is in his words “clinging to total lunacy” (???).

In February, the New Zealand Herald, that bastion of mainstream Covid orthodoxy, published an article entitled “New Zealand records biggest increase in registered deaths in 100 years” The Herald article referred to 2022 mortality figures.

From the headline, it won’t have escaped your notice that the excess deaths have become so large that even the Herald wasn’t able to ignore them, but politicians apparently can. So who are the lunatics now?

The Herald article did its best to downplay the significance of so many people dying:

It began its statistical sleight of hand by comparing 2022 to 2021 rather than the historical average of deaths.

Then mentioned that 2020 had very low deaths because border controls and lockdowns kept seasonal flu and respiratory illness at very low levels. That is true, but it forgot to mention that the same controls and no flu conditions applied to most of 2021 as well.

A Lot of People Are Dying

Was it just a selective memory that made David forget that the Herald had published the official record of elevated excess deaths? Should we expect the Ministry of Health to warn politicians about the elevated number of people dying? Or have they been making sure that the concerning data has a low profile in order to protect themselves from criticism? Is it all going very wrong for the Covid vaccination lobby? Are they panicking? What do you think?

No worries though, the Herald called in that well worn epidemiologist Michael Baker, who for the first time seemed to admit that something might be going wrong. Rather than claiming, as he has previously, that New Zealand has no excess deaths, he started reminiscing about the great success in the initial years of the pandemic, (presumably 2020 when we had no Covid, no vaccines, no flu, and very few doubts about Michael Baker).

In his email, David Seymour asserted that New Zealand has negative excess deaths (less than expected from historical trends). The fundamental of this assertion is that if you average the very low death totals from 2020 with subsequent years, you can make the excess deaths in 2021, 2022, and 2023 look a lot less concerning.

This cumulative averaging of deaths used by Michael Baker, tends to hide what is really going on. In fact, unexplained New Zealand excess deaths are getting larger year by year since 2020. It also avoids facing the fact that hospital admissions are also getting larger year by year and disproportionately affecting the vaccinated. Like the rise in deaths, hospital admissions began to rise in 2021, before we had Covid, but after we had the vaccine rollout, despite the relative absence of seasonal flu.

The Elephant in the Corner of the Room is Becoming Too Large to Ignore

We have reached a point now where the elephant in the corner of the room is becoming too large to ignore. The record-breaking mortality figures from 2022 were complicated by the high number deaths recorded as Covid related. These have tailed off in 2023. Therefore the continuing high rate of excess deaths is doubly concerning.

Have we entered the phase of political disbelief, when it becomes clear that something has gone terribly wrong, but no one wants to accept responsibility? In which misdirection and finger pointing become routine responses.

David Seymour wants us to doubt our sanity. Public health should not be a political football, it is a matter of life and death. Right now, while death is getting the upper hand, no one in authority wants to accept responsibility or do anything about it.

New Zealand is not alone. Overnight the UK Mirror published an article ‘Brits are dying in their tens of thousands – and we don’t really have any idea why‘ It continued:

“Tens of thousands more Brits died than usual from May to December 2022, excluding Covid as a cause of death, raising serious questions as to why so many died”. 

It described the figures as “shocking.”

Professor David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, told the Mirror:

“a lot of Brits are dying, but not necessarily of a specific cause”. 

After talking to the experts and considering everything from hot summers to obesity to dementia to flu to old age to demographic changes, the Mirror concludes:

“This still leaves tens of thousands of dead Brits, with no clear explanation as to quite how they died”.

New Zealand Excess Deaths 18% Above the Five-Year Average

Just as in New Zealand, the high level of excess deaths in the UK is continuing unabated. The week ending April 21 2023, the Office of National Statistics reported excess deaths were 21% above the five year average. That is 2540 excess deaths in one week alone. Currently, in New Zealand, 2023 excess deaths are running at 18% above the five year average, a very comparable figure.

For two years we have been writing about published scientific research containing evidence of increased illness related to Covid vaccination—cancers, heart disease, myocarditis, kidney disease, strokes, neurological illness, etc. These are all conditions with long term implications for health and longevity. We seem to be facing these consequences now, but the government and the health authorities are looking the other way.

The level of polarisation around the issue of Covid vaccine safety is highly concerning. This is a time to carefully examine the excess mortality and hospitalisation data by age, vaccination status, and disease category. Instead, we are finding that considerable efforts are being made to ensure data is hidden from the public. It is especially concerning to find the leaders of New Zealand political parties continuing to push the idea of vaccine safety in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.

Please continue to speak up. The more sane voices we can raise, the greater the chance of someone finally taking these excess deaths seriously.

A preprint paper published this month, shows that IgG4 antibodies are present in the umbilical cord blood of infants born to vaccinated mothers, highlighting a theoretical risk to newborns of an ineffective response to Covid infection. This highlights just how many unknowns we are dealing with when it comes to assessing what will be the long term outcomes of mRNA vaccination.

BUT was this really unknown to those recommending that mRNA vaccination was safe for pregnant women? Documents released by Pfizer under court order reveal that Pfizer and the FDA were well aware of clinical trial results indicating appalling outcomes for babies of pregnant women.

Watch this 20 minute video where dozens of so-called New Zealand experts are recorded telling us that the mRNA Covid vaccines are completely safe for pregnant women in direct contradiction of Pfizer trial results available in April 2021. These indicated an unfolding disaster for babies, including miscarriage, premature birth, cardiac arrest, toxic breast milk, spike protein crossing the placenta, etc.

In the video, their comments are juxtaposed with scientists exposing the highly disturbing content of the Pfizer trials of pregnancy outcomes.

Was the New Zealand Government Aware of This Information?

Certainly, the contractual arrangements that our government had made with Pfizer would have required Pfizer to fully inform the Ministry of Health of all the results of vaccine trials.

BUT the Ministry of Health has completely ignored the information which has become public knowledge. From 1st May 2023, they are again encouraging pregnant and breastfeeding mothers from 16 and up to get a further booster shot. Why? Especially considering the increased incidence of miscarriages and stillbirths since the New Zealand vaccine rollout began.

I can’t imagine at this point in time a more important video to watch than this 20 minute film of our experts lining up to misinform prospective mothers of safety. Were they misled by Pfizer, by the Ministry of Health, by politicians, by the FDA, or by all of the above. OR did they just decide to promote a safety rating without even any evidence to back up their statements? We may never know, but the lesson of this video is clear, we will not be able to trust the medical czars again.

Ardern’s government had an emotional response to the crisis and a mistaken understanding of science, which led to multiple vaccine-induced deaths.

It requires a deep dive into published scientific literature to assess why scientific opinion about Covid vaccines is still polarised, despite the growing evidence of serious harm. Bear with me while we enquire how this happened with reference to an exemplar condition—stroke.

The leaked Wellington Region health data shows that the incidence of strokes requiring hospitalisation in 2023 was up by 25% on pre-pandemic levels. These rises in stroke incidence began in 2021, before the arrival of Covid in New Zealand, but after the vaccine rollout began. Despite this, published scientific papers continue to point to Covid-19 infection as the sole source of increased stroke incidence, in some cases, as in this paper, not even mentioning a possible role of Covid vaccination.

Accordingly, New Zealand Medsafe has been able to continue to maintain there have been only two incidences of vaccine induced deaths; allowing Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and others to cling to the fiction that Covid vaccination is safe.

Are Young Adults Dying Following Covid Vaccination a New Source of Viable Organs?

A pre-pandemic 2016 paper found that victims of fatal strokes are generally robust sources for organ transplant donation, especially if they are younger in age. The one exception was the need for caution with livers transplanted from those dying as a result of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) whose recipients suffered poorer survival outcomes.

This paper published in April 2023, describes a single case of a person who suffered a stroke in October 2021 caused by Covid vaccination whose organs were harvested for transplant. The paper notes in passing that:

“Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcomes, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors.”

In other words, young adults are dying following Covid vaccination in sufficient numbers to be appreciated by transplant surgeons as a new source of viable organs. In this single case, two harvested kidneys are still functioning well for the recipients. The authors leap from the one case study to a general conclusion:

“Kidney allografts transplanted from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donors can have a good overall function with favorable outcomes”

A September 2022 paper reports on kidney transplants from 16 (yes, 16) victims of Covid vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT) to 30 organ recipients in the UK. 5 of the recipients (17%) had concerning test results following surgery and 2 of them lost the graft. The authors conclude “The involvement of VITT could not be completely excluded in one of these cases.” They go on to describe these outcomes as favourable (???).

This paper published in August 2022 studying four successful transplants from a single deceased donor following VITT, notes:

“There are increasing reports of thrombotic complications with various COVID-19 vaccines such as the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA, Moderna mRNA, AstraZeneca Oxford (serum institute), and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccines.”

Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors With Vaccine-induced Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia: Definitely Feasible and Safe

This paper from Italy reports two cases of vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) and subsequent successful transplants, but this letter to the editor of the American Journal of Transplantation in July 2021 presents a far more concerning picture. Of 13 consented deceased donors likely to have died from VITT, 10 actually donated 27 organs in total. 3 of these organs subsequently failed, 2 had impaired function, and one patient died of a cardiac arrest. In total there were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications among 6 recipients (22%) within 9 days of transplant.

The authors concluded that the potential risks of transplanting organs from donors with VITT are twofold. First, early major thrombosis or clinically significant bleeding. Second, possible transmission of pathogenic lymphocytes (anti-PF4), characteristic of blood clotting associated with strokes.

In other words, VITT deceased donors may somehow pass on aspects of their vaccine-induced fatal illness to transplant organ recipients.

This additional case report presents photographic evidence of a kidney from a VITT victim in preparation for transplant showing clear evidence of tissue death and bleeding in the kidney that may be associated with the vaccine induced injury that caused a stroke that was actually concentrated in a completely different part of the physiology.

Transplant Surgeons Are Very Excited to Have More Available Young Donors

You are probably beginning to get the picture aren’t you? Transplant surgeons are very excited to have more available young donors, they announce that the use of organs from VITT is probably viable based on some case studies with very mixed results, but completely fail to comment on the significance of the increased number of cases of vaccine induced death. Incredibly, our government insists only two people have died as a result of Covid vaccination.

Transplant surgeons are narrowly focused on their discipline. Despite being aware of increases in Covid vaccine induced death, they wrote papers which failed to sound the alarm. But it is worse than that, medical authorities, the people who collate statistics of hospitalisation and death, failed to communicate to medical personnel and specialists in disparate fields that there were many categories of vaccine-induced illness, including not only strokes, but also cardiac disease, kidney disease, reproductive disease, cancer and neurological disease.

Now imagine yourself in the position of ED doctors, nurses, GPs, specialists and other medical professionals. Like the transplant surgeons, they almost certainly did see an uptick in specific conditions they were personally treating, but they were rushed off their feet as usual helping patients and were never given information about the big picture by those with access to the summary hospitalisation statistics. Instead, they were repeatedly told the novel biotech vaccines were safe and effective beyond any doubt.

Questioning Vaccine Safety a One-Way Ticket to De-registration

Unbelievably, they were given to understand that questioning vaccine safety was disinformation and therefore a one way ticket to de-registration, loss of employment, income, and career prospects. None but the most principled and well informed, would have gone down that route.

There were other reasons why alarm bells never rang. Doctors are trained to look for specific conditions and offer treatment accordingly. The idea that a vaccine might lead to a general collapse in immune system function giving rise to a wide range of conditions probably never would have occurred to most busy frontline staff. They wouldn’t have connected the dots.

In 1972 I attended a conference at Kingston University in Canada at which Hans Seyle, the inventor of the modern concept of stress spoke. Dr. Seyle explained that stress was the non-specific or general response of the physiology to any strain placed upon it. This illustrated how psychological or physical pressure or overload could evoke general deficits in health. This and other research has led to an understanding that cells network together to maintain health on multiple fronts. In fact, trillions of coordinated biochemical actions are instituted by the body everyday to stave off threats to its health.

Seyle recounted that he invented the concept of stress when he noticed that sick people he treated had something in common—they all looked ill. They were suffering from multiple symptomatology with a single cause—stress.

mRNA vaccines breach the cell membrane in millions if not billions of cells. They effectively reprogram and retask cells. Each cell is a network member. Anyone familiar with network theory will realise that Covid vaccines could degrade the network efficiency of the whole physiology and its immune response.

We are suggesting here a generalised response to Covid vaccines that might leave the door open for multiple vulnerabilities to develop unchecked. In other words, a general mRNA vaccine syndrome characterised by a number of conventional diagnoses appearing widely distributed in the population. This is exactly apparent in the leaked Wellington Region health data—greatly elevated levels of cardiac problems, kidney disease, strokes, reproductive issues, and cancers. Individual published studies we have discussed at the Hatchard Report also include neurological conditions.

Leaked Data Supported by Some Medical Professionals

Since first releasing the leaked data a week ago, I have heard from a number of practising health professionals. Their reports include descriptions of unprecedented increases in the incidence of rare conditions that they would not normally see including cancers.

There are also reports of test result scores that are off the chart, for example, D-dimer scores in the 20,000 to 30,000 range. D-dimer tests are designed to monitor the formation of blood clots associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. All conditions whose incidence is increasing. It is notable that the leaked Wellington Region health data reports around 4% of D-dimer test results for both men and women are registering at elevated levels.

Most health professionals and the public are still being left in the dark as far as the overall data picture is concerned. When you hear politicians like Ardern and Hancock calling for more censorship of discussion, it has to ring alarm bells. Politically controlled censorship of health data availability is entirely inappropriate and without historical precedent. The history of science shows that knowledge and understanding progresses through rational debate. Often the final outcome of scientific debate might be radically different from the first theories advanced.

Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) is often termed the father of empiricism. He argued for the possibility of scientific knowledge based upon inductive reasoning and careful observation of events in nature. His ideas contributed to the emergence of the scientific method. He wrote:

“Reading maketh a full man; conference [debate] a ready man; and writing an exact man.”

Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and Hancock would do well to revise their insistence that people forsake independent investigation or comment, and rely on the government alone for information. Such an approach doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

For More Than Three Years We Have Been Living Through a Time of Crisis

During such periods in human history, people have an emotional need to adhere to a moral stance and ensure that others also follow, but it is also the case that crises are usually accompanied by a confusion of misinformation.

In line with her crusading pandemic policies, Jacinda Ardern has been appointed (no longer online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/jacinda-ardern-announces-new-role-with-harvard-university/) to three tech-governance leadership fellowships at Harvard University. Ardern will be lecturing students and studying ways to alter content standards and platform accountability for extremist content online.

Possibly she would approve of the agenda of UK MP Matt Hancock, formerly the public face of the Covid pandemic, who has supported an amendment to legislation that would prioritise censorship of statements questioning vaccine safety and make them a criminal offence. 

Both Ardern and Hancock believe that we (the public) have not learned lessons from the last two years, where, according to them, health misinformation had a devastating impact. Notably, Hancock has blocked any comments on his Twitter post—an indication of what might be in store for us all.

Government Policies Are the Real Drivers of Health Misinformation

The revelations of widespread ill health contained in the Wellington Region data leak demonstrate how the reverse is true. Government policies restricting access to health data and suppressing open debate are the real drivers of health misinformation and poor pandemic health outcomes.

As we revealed in our recent release at the Hatchard Report “NZ Government Formulated Policy Contrary to Evidence They Had on Their Own Computers. Why?”, early evidence of severe Covid vaccine harm in 2021 prior to the arrival of Covid was ignored. A range of serious illnesses including heart attacks, myocarditis, and acute kidney injury led to greatly elevated hospitalisation rates. It is apparent that only people occupying senior positions in the health service or government like Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, who worked closely with Ardern, had access to this data, but they kept the information completely out of public view. Why?

It seems that Ardern’s all consuming dedication to Covid vaccination arose under a quasi scientific and political umbrella that had an international dimension of interference and control. At the time, Covid vaccination was presented as not just the best option, but the only way to avoid a health catastrophe. We now know that this was highly misleading. mRNA vaccination was not safe and effective, nor did it avert a health catastrophe, but Ardern continues to advise us that it was the best choice.

Vaccine Adverse Effects Officially Labelled as a Conspiracy Theory

In contrast, there were highly qualified researchers and doctors on the international stage like Mike Yeadon, formally a vice president at a Pfizer research division, Dr. Robert Malone, who did early work on mRNA technology development, and many others who were warning of potentially serious outcomes of the new vaccines, such as cancer and immune dysfunction.

However, pharmaceutical interests, science publications, governments, and medical authorities moved rapidly to cancel these voices and sideline them as attention-seeking conspiracy theorists. Here in New Zealand, vaccine adverse effects were officially labelled as a conspiracy theory. To this day, Medsafe has only admitted that two fatalities have been caused by mRNA vaccination out of hundreds of deaths reported proximate to vaccination. And not only that, unprecedented rates of excess all-cause mortality is predominantly affecting the vaccinated.

The risk of vaccine-induced death is real and by now well documented as the sequence of transplant publications and Wellington Region health data show. There are a plethora of other studies linked in previous Hatchard Report articles. I realise it is hard to come to terms with an increased risk of death and possibly easier to ignore the personal implications, but the need to halt further Covid vaccination programs is surely evident.

Hoping That the Problem Will Dissipate or Go Away is Not a Rational Response

Hoping that the problem will dissipate or go away is not a rational response, nor is doubling down on vaccination. Each additional shot increases the risk. This study of health care workers for example found that the bivalent vaccine currently being offered in NZ actually increases the risk of adverse reactions.

mRNA vaccines were initially described as 97% effective. They are now known to reduce Covid infection rates for as few as 1 in 100 recipients. Nor do they stop transmission. It now appears they are associated with multiple serious adverse effects and deaths at rates never observed with traditional vaccines.

It appears the health authorities we were told to trust exclusively were themselves inadvertently spreading misinformation, while many of those being wrongly fact-checked, accused of conspiracy, and cancelled from social media were telling the truth.

Ardern and Hancock were leading figures promoting censorship and guiding public pronouncements of safety. Do you think they deserved the authority they wielded or do you think the Bill of Rights should have taken legal precedence, allowing us freedom of medical choice and information?

One of our subscribers forwarded yesterday’s article “NZ Government Formulated Policy Contrary to Evidence They Had on Their Own Computers. Why?” on the Wellington Region health data leak to their local New Lynn MP Dr. Deborah Russell, Minister for Statistics and Associate Minister for Justice. Surprisingly, he received a very prompt reply.

Dr. Russell cited an opinion piece from Bloomberg (a US magazine, not a scientific publication) in support of her contention that New Zealand has had negative excess mortality for “the last few years”. She suggests that this article illustrates that “the vaccine has not caused deaths and in fact has prevented them”.

The article said no such thing, and I don’t know why Dr. Russell would make the elementary mistake of linking to an article whose main substance appears to run contrary to her assertions.

During the last three years New Zealand has had negative excess mortality in only one year—2020. Covid vaccination was not offered in 2020, and there were very few sporadic cases of Covid infection. Therefore Covid vaccination cannot have had any effect on reducing deaths in 2020. For this obvious reason, the Bloomberg piece does not in fact suggest that vaccination had anything to do with the reduced mortality in 2020. It says that New Zealand’s remote geographic location, border closures, and lockdowns instituted by Jacinda Ardern reduced the incidence of influenza and prevented Covid entering the country. It also notes that these policies had a huge negative impact on New Zealand’s economy.

New Zealand Excess All-cause Mortality is Around 15% Above Historical Trends

In every subsequent year, 2021, 2022, and so far in 2023, New Zealand has had excess all-cause mortality. Recent figures indicate it is running around 15% above historical trends. These figures are consistent with and supported by the leaked hospitalisation data. In the Wellington Region, the number of heart attacks resulting in hospitalisation has increased by 83%. Hospitalisation for myocarditis up by one third (33% increase). Miscarriage, stillbirths, and strokes are all up by a quarter (25% increase). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is up by 40%. The incidence of some cancers is also markedly up.

The social conditions and government pandemic policies applied in 2020 were completely different from those applied in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Conflating the statistics from all four years together in order to come up with some kind of average mortality report card doesn’t make any kind of statistical sense. Moreover, by 2023 it is not disputed by anyone that New Zealand’s health outcomes have declined markedly from historical pre-pandemic levels and crucially are becoming steadily worse. The question we asked is WHY?

Dr. Russell is the Minister of Statistics but chose to bypass answering any of the specific alarming rises in hospital statistics discussed in our articles (see here, here and here). This is disappointing, her Statistics and Justice ministerial portfolios suggest she ought at the very least to investigate and ask questions about unprecedented elevated rates of illness which are overwhelming our health service personnel and degrading the standard of care and health outcomes—both an injustice and a statistical anomaly.

Instead, Dr. Russell launched into an attempt to denigrate my academic qualifications and my right to comment. So this is the kindergarten level game she wants to play. I am surprised she would do so without first communicating with me or checking her facts. She asserted “He claims to have a PhD in Psychology” and said that the awarding institution “is not recognised by the American Psychological Association”.

For the Record

For the record, I have an undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex. A post graduate diploma in education from Canterbury Teachers College, Christchurch. My MA thesis was in mastery learning in mathematics. I obtained my PhD from Maharishi International University (MIU) founded in 1973 in Fairfield, Iowa, USA. MIU is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), the accrediting agency for universities and colleges in the North Central region of the US. The Higher Learning Commission is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).

MIU does not currently offer programs in Psychology, I believe it ceased doing so in the early 2000s. It has received specialized accreditation for its business programs through the International Accreditation Council for Business Education (IACBE). Its graduate programmes have an outstanding job placement record and personal satisfaction ratings.

Professional associations are not in fact university accreditation bodies as Dr. Russell appears to imply. They can ‘endorse’ particular courses, but the American Psychological Association would not have had any reason to endorse MIU Psychology courses at any time in the past because the courses were never clinical in nature, they are research-based as was my PhD work which used panel regression analysis and time series analysis to analyse social indicators.

Also for the record, I was the keynote speaker at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society on crime in 1996. My research into the effects of meditation on health and well being is published in peer reviewed journals. I have a long standing association with the biotechnology testing and safety industry and was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID.

You can draw your own conclusions about the efforts of the current Government to deflect any criticism of their ongoing Covid policies. To silence debate, they appear ready to ignore alarming statistics and quash any open discussion or dissenting voices. This is politicking at its worst, seeking to displace rational science with the misinformed and strident demagoguery of parliament. We need to leave this behind.

It is all the more deplorable because people’s health is at stake. The Hatchard Report is asking for a rational debate to address the causes of the health crisis that is sinking our national health service. People who have fallen sick or lost loved ones deserve answers, treatment, and recompense. The health service itself requires emergency support to meet the evolving crisis.

Who Will Step Up to the Plate?

The Minister of Statistics and Associate Minister of Justice responded, but failed to address the key data. The situation requires cool heads and calm minds, people need to step back, avoid personal attacks and political prejudices. The data is too alarming. Don’t reach for an emotional response, reconsider the facts. We all love New Zealand and we are all hoping for the best outcomes for everyone. There is nothing wrong with asking questions and seeking answers. In times of crisis, you have to deal with the information that is in front of you. The leaked Wellington Region health data raises completely new issues to be considered with the utmost attention to detail and the implications for future health policy. It appears clear that the Covid vaccine rollout needs to be paused, pending this investigation.