spot_imgspot_img
Home Blog Page 20

What is the Difference Between Reading Studies Published in Scientific Journals and Listening to Politicians, Msm, or Government Health Experts?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
What is the Difference Between Reading Studies Published in Scientific Journals and Listening to Politicians, Msm, or Government Health Experts?

Hello, if you are reading or listening to the Hatchard Report for the first time, it is possibly because someone has forwarded this message to you. You may have received mRNA vaccinations against Covid-19 and are now starting to ask questions about its effectiveness and possibly also wondering about safety.

I read and analyse scientific papers published in journals, and I am increasingly concerned that our politicians, media, and health system are falling behind in their research. Here in New Zealand, we are still on the receiving end of an unvaried diet of encouragement to vaccinate and treat the unvaccinated like the plague.

Mainstream media reacted with derision to a poll showing that 57% of us want unvaccinated health professionals to be allowed back to work. TV comments included:

“We need the staff, but I wouldn’t want a family member being treated by an unvaccinated nurse”

“For God’s sake take the jab, go back to work, take one for the team”

Just what are they expecting nurses to ‘take for the team’? A paper published on bioRxiv on 5th January 2023 is entitled “The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein induces long-term transcriptional perturbations of mitochondrial metabolic genes, causes cardiac fibrosis, and reduces myocardial contractile in obese mice“. The authors conclude:

“Our data demonstrated that the Spike protein could induce long-term transcriptional suppression of mitochondria metabolic genes and cause cardiac fibrosis and myocardial contractile impairment.”

That Can’t Be True, Can It?

In other words, long term heart damage, but that can’t be true, can it?—government experts have been reassuring us for years that vaccine induced myocarditis is mild and short lived. Think again. This study published in the journal of infectious diseases on 8th December 2022 entitled “Admission and follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in BNT162b2 Vaccine-Related myocarditis in adolescents” followed the outcomes of nine young male patients with vaccine induced myopericarditis for 3 to 6 months. 100% of participants showed persistent myocardial scarring and/or regional myocardial fibrosis.

It is worth noting that the journal sat on this study for six months following its submission, presumably afraid to rush the publication of research running against vaccine orthodoxy. These days this finding doesn’t stick out. Numerous carefully completed research papers are being published telling it how it is—mRNA vaccination causes long term heart damage. But you wouldn’t know it if you just watch the 6 o’clock news and glance at the daily papers.

Vaccine injury doesn’t just affect males. This study entitled “COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function”whose horrifying findings we have summarised before, published 30 December 2022 concludes:

“Pregnancy complications and menstrual abnormalities are significantly more frequent following COVID-19 vaccinations than Influenza vaccinations. A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised until randomized prospective trials document safety in pregnancy and long-term follow-up in offspring.”

And by the way, the complications referred to are not mild or without a social impact. Across the EU and around the world there has been, in highly vaccinated countries, a marked decline in birth rates. See here and here.

So How Come We Don’t Hear About This Kind of Data?

Yesterday I was in contact with a former employee of one of our major news channels. Apparently, all employees have to sign a non-disclosure agreement; included in this is a clause preventing them from revealing the Covid-19 editorial policy. Just remember, many of New Zealand media outlets are owned by overseas interests who just may not have our kiwi health at heart, and in any case, all of them are paid by the government.

Surely the Elected Government Has Our Interests at Heart?

Shocking analysis published this week on substack here and here has looked at freedom of information (OIA) documents released by the various government departments and CVTAG (the body of experts that gives vaccine advice to the government). The record shows that during and before August 2021, CVTAG had concerns about the risk of myocarditis among younger ages, but abruptly without explanation on 19 August Jacinda Ardern announced that all 12-15 years olds should receive it.

CVTAG continued to have concerns, undoubtedly because research findings of vaccine induced myocarditis were mounting up. The government decided to sail on regardless. In October 2021 an advertising campaign was launched targeting the young headlined with “Two Shots For Summer”. The media, by now funded directly by the government, loved it and called it edgy and needed. On 7th December CVTAG sent out its strongest memo yet advising that those aged under 18 should not be required to have two doses of vaccine under vaccine mandates.

Vaccination Mandates Were Perceived as a Vote Winner

The government didn’t tell us that; by then, it was sailing away from scientific safety advice into the field of political strategy. Vaccination mandates were perceived as a vote winner by all the main political parties: Labour, National, Greens, and ACT. The die was cast and there was no going back. As studies have accumulated in 2022 showing that each successive vaccination or booster increases the risk of injury, politicians across the spectrum have kept silent. As all cause mortality has crept up, now running at 15% above the long term average, the silence has continued.

The figures have been kept from us because of a statistical trick. Ministry of Health analysts have kept asserting, against all evidence, that mRNA vaccination could only possibly have health effects for 21 days subsequent to vaccination. In other words, a false assumption that there are no long term adverse effects of mRNA vaccination. Mathematician Igor Chudov has looked at official data from 29 EU countries for example and found a strong association between mortality and booster uptake.

Dr. Clare Craig, formerly an NHS pathologist tweets:

“There seems to be a concerted denial that harm from injections can occur months after the last injection. Wilful blindness. There is plenty of evidence that harm can indeed occur months later.”

If you look back through my articles, you will see reports of a stream of concerning scientific papers coming out by the week and an increasing number of eminent scientists going public with their concerns. So why on earth in 2023 are the government continuing to be so wilfully blind to our interests? Possibly it is because of the way governments now work and how they acquire information.

100 Days To Outrace The Next Pandemic

Jacinda Ardern will be following the World Economic Forum in Davos. No doubt she is eager to review the presentation tonight by Tony Blair, Helen Clark (former New Zealand PM), and Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer) entitled “100 Days To Outrace The Next Pandemic” whose content is advertised as follows:

“Creating safe and effective vaccines in 100 days is estimated to give economies and societies a chance of containing the next outbreak before it spreads.”

It didn’t happen this time, and it won’t happen next, but if you walk the corridors of power, there is no alternative to a biotech vaccine future, adverse effects be damned. Albert Bourla will be laughing all the way to the bank and has been at our expense for two years. For our scientific view on the safety and effectiveness of biotechnology (or rather lack of it), visit https://GLOBE.GLOBAL. In a modern world, it is beyond foolish to remain uninformed.

The Origin of Life, Consciousness, and Gene Editing

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Origin of Life, Consciousness, and Gene Editing

The general public has been educated to regard DNA as the molecule which unravelled the mystery of the origin of life. When you hear that a mystery is solved, there is a tendency to want to go home, put your feet up, stop worrying, and start looking for something more interesting such as pizza and chips or a good movie.

In fact, the suggestion that we know how life originated is not just an oversimplification, it is a completely misleading suggestion. DNA does not function as a naked molecule. It only acts within the cell. Molecular mechanisms in the cell read the information in the DNA and translate this into hundreds of proteins used in the body for a myriad of functions. The transcription and translation of genetic information is achieved via a complex information-processing system utilizing many types of nucleic acids (mRNA, tRNA, and others) and many specific enzymes. These form a tightly integrated system of systems.

More than a hundred highly complex proteins are involved in translation. The paradox therein has not escaped commentators, these proteins cannot themselves be made except by DNA. The late British philosopher Sir Karl Popper mused for example:

“What makes the origin of life and the genetic code a disturbing riddle is this: the code cannot be translated except by certain products of its own translation.”

In simple terms, the cell presents a chicken and egg paradox. It is impossible to decide which came first—proteins or DNA. Cells present a complex system of multiple interdependent parts, and it is, therefore, hard to imagine how the whole system came into being. It is a self-referral system which functions holistically.

Self-referral systems point to fundamental principles and laws that characterise the search for unified field theories of physics.

Let’s conceptually break down cellular functions:

  • DNA contains strings of information, like the software programme of a computer.
  • The information in the DNA is accessed by forms of RNA, aided by multiple enzymatic proteins and then conveyed to the Ribosome.
  • The Ribosome manufactures proteins, some of which are the same proteins which aid transcription and translation of DNA.
  • Crucially the whole system is integrated within the cell—it refers to itself.

Do We Know Any Other Systems Which Work in an Analogous Self-referral Way?

Yes, we do. Our everyday process of experience in which there is an observer, a process of observation, and an object of perception all integrated within our consciousness, our sense of self. In this analogy:

  • The DNA is like the observer—which is both a constant controlling source of information for the whole project of perception whose memory gets updated by events or experiences
  • The RNA is like the process of observation, it reads the DNA and it connects with and creates proteins.
  • The proteins are similar to the objects of our perception, they are very diversified and active like our environment, and they keep us alive.
  • Our abstract consciousness or sense of self and identity is a silent witness to the whole process and keeps it all together.

This three-in-one structure of consciousness is, therefore, a source candidate for the origin of life. The more so because one primary function of our physiology as a whole seems to be to act as a platform for consciousness to express itself.

Cells divide and thereby replicate themselves. Each new human life begins with a single cell which grows into a complete person through replication. Imagine a machine which makes lego bricks. Lego bricks are inanimate. Each new lego brick is independent of every other lego brick. It takes the consciousness of a person to assemble them into something meaningful.

Cells, however, are alive as they divide and grow; each new cell is connected with a whole system, and each new cell is connected to the unique identity of the person—their consciousness. Cells are bound together, not just mechanistically, but they are part of a system that is alive in the sense that a person is alive—creative, intelligent, self-aware, emotional, and so on.

Our physiology has an extraordinary capacity to coordinate the activity of trillions of diverse types of cells and structures within a single whole system internally communicating while maintaining homeostasis and repair. This also supports a consistent human identity which at the same time communicates intelligently with other humans. This points to the involvement of more universal abstract unified physical laws and also to the primary role of consciousness in human life and physiology.

The Origin of Life

Consciousness is a very good candidate for the source of individual life forms for other reasons. In the structure of natural law, more fundamental explanatory principles are always more abstract. Consciousness is undoubtedly the most abstract concept with which we are familiar.

The qualities which regulate cellular function are also analogous to the functions of consciousness in other very important ways. In the cellular environment and whole system these factors are crucial:

Shape—molecules have to fit into spaces to function and may also form larger systems aided by quasi crystallization processes and molecular folding. There are ‘jigsaw’ or ‘lock and key’ mechanisms whereby only certain components of a molecule can bond with other molecules.

Viscosity—the cellular system is a ‘wet’ or fluid environment whose characteristics must remain optimised for smooth transport of components.

Navigation—cellular components must be able to navigate their way around the cell. This is no small task, there are 42 million molecules in the average cell.

Vibration—there are vibrational modes of all molecules which are modulated by their energy and the temperature of the cellular environment. There are integrated energy sources in cells and feedback loops to maintain this and other functions.

Timing—the sequences of events and their timing are crucial for cellular function.

These processes bear some relationship with the physiology of perception and decision-making. These could be the subject of future discussion, but for the moment consider the complexity of the cell and its dependence on its own self-referral integrated functioning.

The introduction, as happens with mRNA vaccination, of foreign genetically active components could and does upset this integrated balanced functioning. The introduced genetic material has functions that differ from expected cellular functions, it has a different shape, carries different information, bonds and folds differently, etc.

What Does This Mean in Layman’s Terms?

This Christmas, we had some guests who used our clothes dryer. Unaware of its routine care, they failed to empty the condensed water before using it, it overflowed internally, and the dryer stopped working. Yesterday I took it to bits, cleaned and dried it out, and now it works again. Effectively I reset it to its factory condition. Very often, complex equipment such as computers have software fixes to restore initial factory settings, which are used in case the parameters or sequence of instructions have failed. However, this doesn’t solve all problems, as every computer owner eventually finds out.

Cells have their own internal reset buttons. Every day hundreds of thousands of repair jobs are carried out in each cell, whereby the integrity of DNA and a myriad of other crucial parameters are preserved. mRNA vaccination actually aims to override these safety factors and retask some cells to perform an entirely different function. You can imagine what can go wrong. The cell may never recover its factory settings. It might, and research now shows it often does, go on producing toxic spike protein and sending it around the physiology for some time. We are left like a little child, who having inquisitively torn off the arms of its favourite toy, sits and weeps with disappointment when parental repairs are not possible.

Having investigated and proposed an intimate connection between the cell and consciousness. It appears obvious that mRNA vaccination could put the integrity and stability of our consciousness, physiology, survival, and even our identity at risk. Certainly, we are seeing an unprecedented range of adverse effects proximate to mRNA vaccination extending to neurology, cancers, and cardiac effects affecting organs and organ systems. Such effects appear in some cases to be related to the dispersion of inoculated foreign genetic material in physiology carrying rogue instructions.

Health systems around the world are struggling to arrive at effective responses to these adverse effects. A sensible diet, exercise, and rest are always an aid to health conditions, along with many other approaches known to medicine, but the extent that these can facilitate the self repair of deliberate genetic modification is unknown.

Because consciousness is fundamental to physiology, there are reasonable grounds to suppose there are techniques of meditation, technologies of consciousness, which can at least partially assist with recovery from health conditions resulting from mRNA vaccination. I have discussed these at length elsewhere in my book Your DNA Diet along with over 800 references to research demonstrating physiological, psychological, and sociological benefits of meditation.

However, there is no evidence at present suggesting this or any other approach will be curative for serious long term damage from genetic modification. There appears, in the case of those who might be seriously impacted by genetic dysfunction, to be no external reset button to rewind the clock of gene editing. There are no known magic bullets. Any possible efficacy concerning recovery would first have to be assessed by research.

The main point I want to make in this article is to emphasise the extreme risks of genetic manipulation. Nature’s designer went to great lengths to place the cell, especially the cell nucleus, off limits to interference and modification. It is at the core of life and its perpetuation via reproduction. Nature similarly ring-fenced the nucleus of the atom for very good reasons. If we were unsure in any way before the pandemic about the safety of gene editing, there should be no doubt now. It should be off limits. Its continued use is an unfolding catastrophe.

At GLOBE.GLOBAL, we are calling for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation.

Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

The New Zealand Government Reaches for Total Medical Control

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The New Zealand Government Reaches for Total Medical Control

For millions of years, humans and animals have maintained their health by eating the fruits of the earth.

The necessity and benefits of a broad natural diet are evident from Egyptian skeletal remains from 6000 years ago, which suggest scurvy—a disease resulting from a lack of vitamin C. In 1753 a Scottish surgeon, James Lind demonstrated that scurvy could be treated with citrus fruit. The New Zealand government seems intent on changing history.

Just before Christmas, our Government introduced the Therapeutic Products Bill for its first reading. Public consultation is being rushed through the summer holidays here in the southern hemisphere and closes on February 15th. The Bill contains 423 pages of dense provisions with countless cross references. I am not sure whether any MPs actually read it before voting for its acceptance or whether the public could stand to do so. You can view my video summary of its draconian provisions here.

You might be interested in the kind of nation we will end up inhabiting:

Reverse Patenting

If a Natural Health Product is found to benefit a serious illness (such as lemons which benefit scurvy), according to the Bill it should be classed as a medicine. Consequently, according to the letter of the new law, only doctors will be allowed to prescribe lemons. Joking apart, most foods benefit serious illness. You might think there is no need to pass a law classifying them as medicines, but according to the government you would be wrong.

80% of drugs are in fact derived from the properties of plants. For years pharmaceutical companies have been trying to patent medicinal plants and secure a monopoly of their supply and use. But this effort largely failed in the patent courts. The remedy for pharmaceutical companies is contained in the Bill being introduced by our Labour government. If a plant is used to make a medicine or the molecular structure of any of its compounds is mimicked by a medicine, then the use of the actual plant should be restricted.

For this reason, in 2016, a bevy of well-paid Ministry of Health experts (???) produced an idiotic list of common plants that they envisioned should be restricted. Natural products in this list included cinnamon, eggplant, almond, mustard, tea (yes you did read that correctly), coconut, and many many others. The present Bill (the third attempt over the years to get this past Parliament) sets up the same conditions that prompted the 2016 list of restricted plants. A sort of frenzied desire to control the minutia of individual life driven by a mad instinct that the government always knows best.

More than 50% of NZ citizens use natural products, so you might think their availability should not be controlled by the government. Wrong again. The Bill requires the appointment of a regulator who will decide for us what among what we have eaten for millennia can be sold openly and what should be restricted. The idea that one person can decide for all of us what plants that grow in the earth, can be sold, eaten, or used puts New Zealand in a unique class among tin pot kingdoms. We can imagine as we gather around the family breakfast table a swarm of well-paid government experts with pens and questionnaires hovering close by for a final check.

The situation at the border is very similar. If a herb benefits health, it will be a medicine and therefore cannot be imported except with a permit. Border officials will be very busy examining packages and if they find anything healthy, tossing it in the bin. Am I exaggerating? No. Rauwolfia Serpentina is an Indian herb that reduces blood pressure. Studies such this one published in 2015 show it is a safe and effective treatment for high blood pressure, but it is banned here in New Zealand because some hypertension drugs contain synthetic copies of one of the many alkaloids found in the whole plant—reverse patenting at its best.

Why is the Government Intending to Regulate Natural Health Products?

A rational answer to this question is hard to find. A recent EU study found that natural health products are 45,000 times safer than pharmaceutical drugs. The government, however, apparently believes they are unsafe, but where is the evidence? It doesn’t exist. An imaginary NZ doctor explains to their teenage patient:

“Years ago, before you were born, dearly beloved, a person whose name is lost in the mists of time might have felt a little off colour after taking a vitamin tablet and then recovered quickly. Ever since then, the New Zealand government has quite rightly been very suspicious of vitamins and plants grown in soil. So they are introducing a new and very honest law for us all.” or words to that effect.

There are many continuous traditions of natural approaches to health that have been followed by cultures on every continent for thousands of years and still are. There are more modern ones too that have attracted followers guided by trained practitioners. These include Indian Ayurveda, Chinese medicine, Chiropractic, Homeopathy, etc. The idea that a regulator who is unfamiliar with these traditions should control their practice and availability is inherently flawed.

This Bill represents an attempt to impose a modern medical/pharmaceutical straight jacket on the process of medical choice. A straight jacket that will no doubt be administered by people who are unfamiliar with and even opposed to natural medicine. The apparent intention is to drive people towards pharmaceutical-based medicine. It is worth noting that modern medical misadventure and misprescription is the third leading cause of death—hardly a direction that deserves a monopoly.

The logic of insisting on total government control of medical choice escapes me. It fits with a perspective that has been steadily growing throughout the pandemic: the government is seeking to control every aspect of life and impose a kind of uniformity on the nation. This originates from a distorted one size fits all view of reality. Diversity is actually a great source of progress and happiness, not something to be stamped out—a discredited communistic perspective.

It is rather curious that for two years the government has been denying there is any connection between serious illness and mRNA vaccination despite tens of thousands of instances of illness proximate to inoculation and studies showing a statistical connection, as well as plausible biomolecular mechanisms. In contrast, on account of a very, very small handful of unproven historical complaints about natural health products, despite widespread safe use, they wish to control what we eat and what health choices we can make.

Whichever side of the vaccine debate you are on, it should be clear that the government cannot have it both ways. They can’t apply different and incompatible logic as it suits their agenda. All the more curious when many vaccine injured and long Covid sufferers are relying on natural health products to help get them through conditions which many of our medical professionals deny exist.

Last night I spoke to a medical doctor who described how his comments on the benefits of Vitamin C and D have been censored by his colleagues and officials. No surprise really, doctors only spend an hour or two learning about the principles of nutrition during the entire course of their long training. One of his colleagues told him the only benefit of vitamins is to change the colour of urine. That just about says it all. James Lind, who found that lemons cure scurvy, must be turning in his grave.

There is in fact no reasonable rationale for introducing restrictions on Natural Health Products, they are not harming anyone and studies show that many of them have significant benefits for health. The introduction of the new law will cost a lot and it will be paid for by financial levies on manufacturers, importers, suppliers, practitioners, and retailers. A single company selling 300 products, each making two health claims, will be liable for as much as $3 million in government charges. Ultimately these costs will be passed onto the public making natural health products unaffordable.

What the Bill Doesn’t Do

Gradually over the last few years, synthetic flavours and additives have been turning up in processed supermarket items. If you are buying vanilla ice cream, it is now usually labelled as containing natural vanilla flavour. This is not in fact made from natural vanilla beans, it is a synthetic flavour. The use of the term “natural” is intended to disguise this fact. In 2016 our Ministry of Health approved over 3,000 synthetic ingredients, many of them without safety testing. The Therapeutic Products Bill will do nothing to correct the sleight of hand that is describing synthetic additives with an unknown safety profile as ‘natural’. I discuss many of the ways synthetic additives are affecting health in my book Your DNA Diet.

Nor will the Bill encourage the distribution of information about natural approaches to health that studies show are very beneficial in controlling common serious health conditions. Advice for example about diet, exercise, and the curbing of unhealthy habits such as smoking, excessive drinking, or ultra processed foods. Changes in lifestyle can be very influential in reducing cardiac problems as this BBC interview reports. Many other serious health condition outcomes could be improved in this way including cancer, obesity, diabetes, blood pressure, etc.

If the government wishes to encourage improvements in health and longevity, it would do well to launch a public education programme about natural health products and approaches rather than seek to limit their use.

What You Can Do

If we wish to be able to continue to freely choose natural health options, herbal medicines and supplements without government interference, we will need to speak up. Go to this link to make a submission before February 15th. Write to your MP and complain that the appointment of a regulator amounts to an open ended blank cheque to control the sale and use of products used by more than 50% of our population without fully specifying the principles he should use. Moreover, it will put many NZ businesses out of action. I could say a lot more but now is the time for all of us to have a go and hold up our hands. If we don’t, we will only have ourselves to blame. Given the short submission time available, we have to take a scattershot approach, contact as many people as you can and explain how this is going to seriously affect their health options now and down the line.

Press release Therapeutic Products Bill introduced.
The Therapeutic Products Bill
Related Documents and Downloads

Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

Related Articles

Natural Products Regulation—An Overreach of Government Control

How will the 2023 Therapeutic Products Bill affect the Availability of Natural Health Products? – Includes a very informative video.

A Week of Extraordinary Revelations: Studies Confirm Serious Adverse Effects After Covid Vaccination

Guy Hatchard
-
0
A Week of Extraordinary Revelations: Studies Confirm Serious Adverse Effects After Covid Vaccination

Flying under the radar, the BBC has been accused of orchestrating an alliance of legacy media outlets and social media sites to suppress competition from alternative media. This is entitled “The Trusted News Initiative”. 

An antitrust lawsuit filed on January 10th 2023 in the US has obtained documents which they say indicate that the BBC joined with the Washington Post, Reuters, AP, Meta, Google, Twitter, and others in order to protect their business models from competition. Whilst publicly talking about suppressing misinformation, documents indicate that the real intention was to exclude other information platforms, whether their reports were true or not. You can view Tucker Carlson interviewing Robert Kennedy Jnr. about the lawsuit here.

There appears to be little doubt that vital information about Covid vaccine safety was withheld from the public as a result.

Covid Vaccination Increases the Risk of Pulmonary Embolism in Persons Over 65

Meanwhile, published studies continue to pour in which reveal the horrifying extent and prevalence of Covid vaccine injury. For two years, we have been told that Covid vaccines are especially essential for older age cohorts. A study published January 9th, 2023, in the journal Vaccine entitled “Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older” reports that Covid vaccination increases the risk of pulmonary embolism in the age group by 50%. A pulmonary embolism occurs when a clump of material, most often a blood clot, gets stuck in an artery in the lungs, blocking the flow of blood.

A study published in Vaccine on 22 September 2022 “Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults” by Dr. Joseph Fraiman and others, is gaining increased traction. The authors completed secondary analysis of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA phase III clinical trials and found they were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI −0.4 to 20.6 and −3.6 to 33.8), respectively.

The study concluded: 

“The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.”

The continued refusal to release the datasets from the Pfizer and Moderna trials is raising eyebrows very high indeed. Even the BBC has been forced to consider the evidence that the vaccines are raising all cause deaths to record levels in the UK. Watch this interview with Dr. Aseem Malhotra, which took place yesterday. It is a first for mainstream media exposure.

An article in Frontiers of Immunology published 12th January 2023, “mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 induce comparably low long-term IgG Fc galactosylation and sialylation levels but increasing long-term IgG4 responses compared to an adenovirus-based vaccine” reveals some concerning news. The initially obscure conclusion reached by the study states:

“Repeated immunization of naïve individuals with the mRNA vaccines increased the proportion of the IgG4 subclass over time which might influence the long-term Ab effector functions. Taken together, these data shed light on these novel vaccine formats and might have potential implications for their long-term efficacy.”

Translating this into everyday English, the study found that mRNA vaccines cause a worrying drop off in immune responses to Covid infection that increases over time, leaving vaccine recipients more vulnerable to repeated infection. Crucially the long term outcomes of this are unclear. Igor Chudov discusses the possible implications for our immune tolerance here.

Eminent cardiologist Dr. Malhotra is asking that the mRNA vaccination programme be withdrawn based on the published evidence. Our government and the health service remain silent and apparently unrepentant. For two years, many science writers, doctors, and other professionals asking questions have been labelled conspiracy theorists. The mounting evidence is by now unequivocally pointing to a conspiracy—a very concerning alliance of media, government, medical professionals, and pharmaceutical companies determined to remain silent in the face of overwhelming evidence of harm to the public.

How will the 2023 Therapeutic Products Bill affect the Availability of Natural Health Products?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
How will the 2023 Therapeutic Products Bill affect the Availability of Natural Health Products?

An Open message to Parliament.

Why are they regulating natural health products?

How will the therapeutic products Bill affect us?

What does the public want?

The public are aware that research findings on diet, nutrition, and lifestyle indicate that there are proven health benefits.

Over 50% of the public use natural health products and alternative approaches to health care.

The public realise there are many traditional sources of information about what products can be used safely.

If an individual suffers from a chronic or serious illness, or simply wants to maintain health, they need to retain their options to research and choose the most effective treatment for them.

The new bill will regulate all natural health products that claim to benefit health.

This is an enabling bill. As a result, the government will appoint a regulator who will then decide for you what products can be sold and what health claims can be made.

Well, what will the regulator decide?

In 2016, the Ministry of Health published a draft list of 5500 approved and all restricted ingredients. Most likely, the decisions of the new regulator, when appointed, will be based on this list.

Let’s answer the public’s first question.

Are all these ingredients safe?

The 2016 Ministry of Health permitted list included 3000 synthetic and chemical additives.

A closer look shows that the permitted list includes many additives which are suspected of causing illness and cancer. Including:

  • FD&C red No. 2
  • Amaranth, No. 3
  • Erythrosine No. 4
  • Ponceau

All are banned in the USA by the FDA.

A 2007 study in the UK found a possible link between six food dyes, a preservative and hyperactivity in children. All these compounds are likely to be permitted by the bill.

Thousands of artificial fragrances and flavours have been approved, even though they have not been tested properly.

Here’s an example of a pre-approved synthetic product. This cheap popular drink is available in New Zealand supermarkets. All of its ingredients have already been approved by the Ministry of Health.

These include:

  • Sugar: which predisposes to obesity and aggravates diabetes
  • E330 Synthetic citric acid
  • Synthetic raspberry flavour, effects unknown.
  • E211 sodium benzoate: implicated as a possible cause of hyperactivity when used with E122
  • Colour E122 Carmoisine: banned in the United States, Sweden, Norway and Austria
  • Artificial sweetener E961 Neotame: similar to aspartame and banned in organic products. US FDA application noted adverse reactions. Dr. Mercola recommends this be avoided at all costs.

This bill will allow this synthetic product to be marketed as a natural health product.

We’re talking about serious health issues here. During the last 20 to 30 years, there’s been a huge expansion in chronic diseases, including cancers, diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and other mental and physical illnesses.

No one knows the exact causes but poor nutrition food, food additives and environmental pollution are all suspected.

Over 2000 new chemicals are registered each year. There’s been a rapid expansion in the use of chemicals in food and synthetic chemicals. Many of these have been approved without sufficient scrutiny.

Using discredited principles such as substantial equivalence additives that are similar to but slightly different from natural compounds have been approved in though is well known that very small differences in chemical structure can cause serious side effects.

The bill requires the regulation of entirely natural ingredients already known to be safe, in other words, foods.

Under the bill, all ingredients have to be pre-approved. We estimate a supplier will pay $200 annually for each ingredient.

The probable minimal cost of making a health claim on the label will be $5,000 to the regulator for each application. And for each mild condition, your product claims to benefit.

But you will not be allowed to claim that a natural health product can benefit a serious health condition.

If it is considered that your product has therapeutic value, you will pay around $100,000 to register it as a medicine. And only a medical doctor will be allowed to prescribe it.

An EU report found that natural health products are 45,000 times safer than pharmaceutical drugs; Despite this, suppliers will have to comply with pharmaceutical style regulations and undertake frequent costly testing of ingredients and products.

Say you’re selling 300 product products to the public, and each one benefits two mild conditions; the application fees alone will be $3 million before you’ve even begun to prepare your evidence.

The experience in Australia has been that the preparation of a single application can cost in excess of $100,000.

These restrictions are so costly that most suppliers will simply refrain from making health claims, so you’ll have less information. Many will go out of business.

The net effect of these regulations will be that consumers will have less information than they did before.

Restrictions on scientific information regarding serious illness

Did you know that the simple kitchen spice turmeric is effective in preventing bowel cancer?

There are a lot of studies.

New Zealand has one of the highest death rates from bowel cancer in the developed world.

Studies show that garlic, ginger, turmeric, thyme, rosemary, sage, spearmint, and peppermint all inhibit the growth of colon cancer cells.

A study found that 1/3 of patients with end stage bowel cancer for whom no other treatment options existed, improved after treatment with turmeric extract.

If the bill is passed, I would not be allowed to tell you this and could be liable for a substantial fine.

So there are restrictions on free speech

It has been proven for years that garlic benefits healthy heart conditions. No one selling garlic will be allowed to communicate this factual scientific information. Thereby the bill will restrict free speech and suppress matters of fact.

There’ll be restrictions on health claims

A consignment of this product, Vicks vapour rub, was seized by Medsafe. Officials in May 2016 and destroyed because the Label made this unapproved health claim:

Apply to the chest, throat, and back for 3-way relief from blocked nose, cough, and body ache.


Thousands of products could be snagged by this rule.

Restrictions on dose

In 2016 the Ministry of Health believed that the maximum daily dose of vitamin B 12 should be 50 micrograms. This product, vitamin B 12, is commonly used by people who are deficient. It has hit each dose 20 times the maximum daily dose specified by the Ministry of Health. So it could be banned.

A typical Indian or Thai meal may contain 50 grams of tamarind. The maximum daily dose of tamarind that has been permitted by the bill is 500 milligrams, that is 100 times smaller than the amount you might consume in a meal.

Civil servants have been employed to make up this ridiculous rule and hundreds more like it.

Banned ingredients

Even though this traditional coffee substitute contains only natural plants, it will be banned by the bill because it contains an ingredient that is listed under the medicines act.

A sort of reverse patenting that bans herbs if they are used to make medicines.

Hundreds of traditional remedies will disappear.

Neem is one of the world’s most revered traditional healing plants with many medical uses. Among its many uses, it reduces inflammation associated with internal ulcers. It’s so effective that pharmaceutical companies have tried to patent this plant.

The regulator is likely to classify this herb as suitable for external use only. Effectively banning its traditional use for no reason.

This popular form of vitamin C could be banned because it contains a derivative of lecithin (commonly used in chocolate and other supermarket products), which in 2016, was classified by the Ministry of Health as for “external use only“.

Restrictions on traditional Indian and Chinese medicine

The bill will empower the regulator to restrict the traditional practices of ethnic communities, and it will violate the Bill of Rights.

More than 150 commonly used Indian herbs and a similar number of Chinese herbs were wrongly placed on a not permitted list by the Ministry of Health in 2016.

To a large extent, this is because many traditional herbs have been found to be so healthy, that they have been used to develop medicines and therefore these ingredients will be restricted in natural health products.

There are more than 10,000 traditional healing herbs. It will cost more than $100 million to register their healing properties, so in effect, their use will likely cease in New Zealand.

Just look at this list. This is just a short extract from 300 herbs that the Ministry of Health sought to restrict in 2016. The last time they tried to introduce a bill of this type.

These are foods that we consume many of us regularly, why should they be restricted it doesn’t make any sense.

What will it cost you

And these restrictions are going to cost a lot. Last week a 50 gram packet of Rubia Cordifolia, a herb used to make healthy tea cost $12.

After the bill is passed, the same packet may cost 60 to $80, just due to the compliance clock costs.

There are over 100,000 eligible plants. It will take an army of civil servants years to classify even a small proportion of them.

Assessment costs will be paid by the manufacturing industry so the cost of natural health products will obviously rise dramatically.

What will escape regulation

Well, many unhealthy products will be allowed to be sold without regulation.

Sugary Drinks, hard fat, synthetic flavours, and alcohol will continue to be sold unimpeded….

while the government pours millions of dollars and years of fruitless effort into controlling products that are already known to be safe and healthy foods.

This would be ridiculous if it wasn’t immoral and criminal.

There is absolutely no need for the government to regulate natural foods that are based on DNA that are used in natural health products.

Natural foods and herbs should be automatically excluded from regulation. There is no need to do this.

Meanwhile, there is a crisis in healthcare

Medical misadventure, experimentation and interventions have just become the number one cause of death in the world.

Healthcare costs are spiralling out of control.

Mental illness has quadrupled.

Cancers, chronic diseases, heart disease, and many other conditions are increasing to epidemic proportions, all cause mortality is rising.

Clearly something has gone horribly wrong. But no one knows quite why.

There is no doubt that food additives and the drugs we take play a pivotal role in the development of disease.

There have been multiple failures in the regulatory processes which approve agricultural practices food and medicine.

How has this happened?

The process of regulation has moved away from science and becomes a cosy relationship between industry and regulators permitting unsafe and inappropriate products onto the market.

The bill, the proposed, bill represents a new phase of this cosy relationship. Regulators worldwide are cooperating to place restrictions on natural health products. And this will only benefit multinational companies.

What can we do to reverse this trend?

There is a scientific standard scientific approach to identify cause

Eliminate suspected causal factors and reintroduce them one by one.

Dr. Dee Mangin at Otago Medical School, has found that if you stop all non-essential medication for the elderly, their health improves.

Dr. Julia Rutledge at Canterbury University has found that greatly improved nutrition benefits children with ADHD.

Dr. Kulreet Chaudhary, a renowned San Diego neurologist, has found that her patients, including MS sufferers, improved dramatically when placed on a traditional herbal diet.

These are just pointers to the many scientific preventive approaches to health care, which are springing up everywhere based on natural foods.

So why is our parliament planning to restrict natural health products?

We need to remind ourselves there is no evidence that natural health products are unsafe.

In fact, there’s a great deal of evidence that they benefit health and prevent illness.

Natural health products are traditionally made from plants and animal products which are based on DNA and natural minerals.

Our digestive system has developed to easily metabolise food based on DNA without side effects.

Many people rely on natural health products to maintain their health. It will be criminally negligent to restrict their options.

True natural health products are in fact foods.

There is nothing risky about their use.

Taking natural health products is no different from the need to have a balanced meal.

Food is life. It is our first medicine.

The healing properties of plants are proven to benefit public health. Our right to use them should not be taken away by law and transferred to pharmaceutical interests.

We are a people here who believe in fairness.

This is not the time for New Zealand to become involved in an international effort to subvert regulatory safeguards.

This is not the time to restrict access to preventive health care.

This is not the time to allow suspected unhealthy synthetic ingredients to be included in natural health products.

This is not the time to restrict access to herbs and impose huge unjustified costs on traditional medicine.

This is a time for New Zealand to lead the world in the development of application of preventive approaches to health care.

The therapeutic products bill is currently up for public submissions up until February 15, 2023. Make a submission here.

Ask your MP to review this presentation, which shows that the bill relies upon outdated and discredited ideas.

Or you can contact me directly at my email ghatchard@gmail.com or go to my website for more information. Thank you

Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

How Can People In Power Lie So Comfortably

Guy Hatchard
-
0
How Can People In Power Lie So Comfortably

Yesterday I was enjoying lunch at a restaurant, and I couldn’t help overhearing the extended family at the adjacent table having a concerning and tragic conversation.

A young boy of eight had died suddenly after a cardiac arrest and a brain bleed, and another boy of eight or nine, also known to the family, died suddenly on the very same day. The mother was upset, she was at a loss to understand how this could have happened. The grandfather offered some well intentioned words of comfort: “it could have happened to anyone, it is God’s will”.

I am not a fatalist. Things happen through cause and effect. I believe we have the freedom to choose between right and wrong. What’s more, “As you sow, so shall you reap”. Ultimately the universe is balanced and your deeds catch up with you. This is as much about Newton’s Laws as it is about religious faith. In India, they have a saying Truth Alone Triumphs. Their philosophy of karma mirrors that of Christ, the Buddha, and others.

You must have been reading about the Buffalo Bills’ safety Damar Hamlin aged 24, who suffered a cardiac arrest on the field. Nine days later, he has now been discharged from the hospital. The football world breathed a collective sigh of relief for him and his family. You may not have heard of Hunter Brown, Air Force offensive lineman, dead this week at 21. The New York Post reported Brown suffered a medical emergency, not on the field, but as he was leaving his dorm. First responders were unable to save him.

There’s more. If you read the sports pages of the Euro Weekly, you suddenly become aware of just how many public sports figures of all ages are passing away suddenly—seven this week alone, and that’s just a representative few of them. That doesn’t include those not in the public eye. It doesn’t include two active young boys dying suddenly in the same town in New Zealand on the same day. Deaths I haven’t seen reported in our newspapers.

People Who Lie Comfortably

Following public statements of concern about record high rates of excess death from high profile medical experts and some MPs, the BBC is reporting that there is no reason to be concerned (???). The author Rachel Schraer is a BBC reporter whom the Hatchard Report has had cause to criticise previously, for telling the public that the Covid jabs are safe and effective.

Here she does it again with cherries on top. The article reports Andrew Bridgen MP has been suspended for five days for quoting an eminent UK cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra who has concerns about multiple deaths related to Covid vaccines based on studies which he has discussed in detail in his peer reviewed scientific papers. Schraer responds: serious side effects from Covid Vaccines are rare (???) and says “Extensive independent research shows that Covid vaccines are extremely effective at preventing deaths”, but unlike Malhotra she doesn’t reference her research. There is a good reason for this. It doesn’t exist except in the imagination of MPs, media moguls, die-hard vaccine advocates, and others anxious to please PM Rishi Sunak whose former hedge fund invested heavily in biotechnology.

Tory Chief Whip Simon Hart joined in the grovelling and jingoistic fervour with “As a nation we should be very proud of what has been achieved through the vaccine programme” (???).He didn’t mention that Covid vaccines have not prevented infection, hospitalisation, or death. He didn’t mention that the rate of excess all-cause deaths in the UK is continuing to rise. Presumably Hart is proud of vaccine injury; there appears to be nothing else to be proud about. Following Bridgen’s suspension, adverse effects of Covid vaccines are now officially unmentionable in the UK Parliament; the government-funded BBC is applauding at every possible opportunity.

Actually, serious adverse effects from Covid vaccines are so rare that they dwarf the totals of side effects from all other vaccines ever given in history. There are clever ways to hide these astronomical totals. If you assume for example that Covid vaccines could only possibly cause deaths in the three weeks following the jab, you can minimise totals. If you then produce a list of fatal conditions like neurological conditions and cancers for example that couldn’t possibly (???) be caused by vaccines, you can subtract all those deaths and arrive at a manageable total which can be relayed to the public. Even that total (60 according to the BBC) would have, in days of yore (pre-pandemic), resulted in the withdrawal of a pharmaceutical product. Back then, even two deaths would have been sufficient.

For the Record, It is Not Safe

I don’t want to put too fine a point on this, but all this obfuscation, hiding, sweeping under the carpet, and trumpet blowing about non-existent achievements amounts to lying. There seem to be a great many ‘great’ people in the public eye who have gotten used to lying comfortably. Many among our great and good rulers have difficulty admitting that they don’t know much about something; they are quite happy to have us believe they know all about biotechnology safety. For the record, it is not safe.

In fact, biotechnology is busy shaking up the arrangement of the ancient building blocks of life and coming up with surprises almost every week. Here at the Hatchard Report we come across published studies almost every day and write about them (with links). A little known study published in August 2022 by PubMed reports that Botox injections are less effective after Pfizer Covid-19 injections. I haven’t had one myself, so I am not in a position to recommend them, but I want to say that no one knows why Covid-19 injections interfere with Botox.

Popular beauty magazine Allure is having none of it. The article “Is the COVID-19 Vaccine Making Your Botox Wear Off Faster??” repeatedly urges its readers to “get the vaccine [and the booster] anyway”. Beauty is apparently too precious a possession to let a study interfere with your botox routines or stop you from having a vaccine.

If It Doesn’t Happen Within Three Weeks, It Doesn’t Matter

Add botox to a very long list of what no one knows about Covid inoculations, and biotechnology in general. In truth, no one knows what effects are going to surface over time, but they would have you believe that if it doesn’t happen within three weeks and it’s not on their approved list, it doesn’t matter. That, ladies and gentlemen, is a lie. One that is still rolling very easily off the tongues of government officials and pro-vaccine insiders all over the world who are increasingly worried that we might find out that they mandated a killer and told us to give it to little children.

Despite the collapse of the pro-vaccine narrative, the appetite for lying appears to have grown stronger. The BBC article puts asking questions on Covid vaccine safety on a par with denying the holocaust. An absurd comparison.

Evidently, there is something addictive about the ‘lying’ habit, despite it always being wrong. Our mothers and teachers were right to discourage it. If our MPs continue to wilfully employ this tactic on both sides of the house, if they continue to stand by and watch people die, they will all be suddenly due for a stretch in the wilderness. Deaths have a cause. They do not suddenly increase for no reason, nor are they convenient political footballs.

I would like to conclude at this point by saying that time has a habit of sorting this out, but time is not on our side right now. Tragically we have found out the hard way that we can’t entrust the safety of our children to officials. They don’t care. Much is unknown about biotechnology, but one quality that is becoming increasingly clear is its deadly effect. It upsets the physiological balance that our health relies on every day, and for some people, that is proving final. Apparently, our leaders only care about covering their behinds and hiding their Pinocchio noses with masks.

People who die do not have a voice anymore, but they deserve justice. Justice here can only be the restoration of truth and an immediate change in pandemic policy.

The Secret War—How Our World and the Medical Landscape Has Been Transformed

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Secret War—How Our World and the Medical Landscape Has Been Transformed

A paper was published this week outlining a study completed in Taiwan. A survey of ECG (Electrocardiogram) parameters after the Pfizer Covid shot found that 17.1% of senior high school students had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. 1% of students returned abnormal ECG measurements. The study concluded:

“Cardiac symptoms are common after the second dose of BNT162b2 (Pfizer) vaccine, but the incidences of significant arrhythmias and myocarditis are only 0.1%.”

85% of the estimated 500,000 12-18 year olds have been vaccinated in New Zealand. 0.1% of this number is 425 children who the study estimates will have had “significant arrhythmias and myocarditis”, while 4,250 would have returned an “abnormal ECG”, and17,625 who will have had “at least one cardiac symptom”.

My immediate issue is with the use of the term “only” in the conclusion. Many of these cases will have gone undetected and untreated, or worse, dismissed out of hand by doctors as insignificant or due to anxiety. Left untreated, some of these kids are likely to go on to develop serious complications that may leave them vulnerable to sudden cardiac events and even death.

If you follow Twitter closely, as some of our researchers do for us, you will have noticed that a number of qualified doctors are very busy on Twitter dismissing concerns. This week after the sudden collapse of a college basketball star on the field, Tweeters who were present at the game expressing concern (who didn’t mention vaccination) were nevertheless rapidly attacked for making a fuss about “nothing”. According to many doctors, sudden collapse during sports is now normal and nothing to worry about???

How Has This Happened?

You must have noticed a worrying trend increasing over the last few decades. When you visit some doctors, they seem to spend more time looking at their computer than they do questioning or looking at you. This is because the Ministry of Health has linked them with databases allowing them to enter symptoms and ask the computer what tests to run and what pills to prescribe. A sort of lazy man’s approach to doctoring largely controlled by pharmaceutical firms.

It is no surprise to realise that the “treatment” (???) of Covid vaccine injury has also been automated in this way. Doctors have been prompted to treat chest pains, palpitations, and shortness of breath as normal outcomes of vaccination. They never were before Covid Pfizer vaccines. Previously these symptoms would have prompted a call for an ambulance. The variety of ways that concerns are dismissed is mind boggling. CBS News reports this week, five college basketball players were hospitalised in Chicago following a workout. Incredibly the coach was blamed and removed.

The Bigger Picture

Increasingly authorities, politicians, and doctors have allowed themselves to fall into the hands of information supplied directly to their computers by operators with commercial and political agendas. Many of these operators are working in a global space outside of the boundaries of national regulation, and they directly control medical agendas via sophisticated databases pushing suspect information. You are no doubt aware that Big Pharma is fully involved. Concerning Pfizer trial outcomes were kept well away from public view. Incredibly, military and spy agencies have also become involved and are possibly contributing to the advice your local doctor is offering you about Covid.

During the first Gulf War (1990-91) the US military suspected troops might face damage from deadly nerve agents like sarin. Soldiers were issued pyridostigmine bromide pills and vaccinated against anthrax. More than one third of returning veterans suffered from Gulf War Syndrome, a chronic and multi-symptomatic disorder. A wide range of acute and chronic symptoms have been linked to it, including fatigue, muscle pain, cognitive problems, insomnia, rashes, and diarrhea. The causes of Gulf War Syndrome have never been determined.

I am using this example not to point the finger at any cause but rather to suggest that the US military has a long history of involvement with Big Pharma. The pharmaceutical industry is a military contractor. Recently discussion and evidence has surfaced that the US Department of Defense (DoD) has been closely involved with the formulation and promotion of pandemic policy. Why? Left wing, pro-vaccine news platform Politico reports:

“Officials are launching a new plan to develop medical treatments, vaccines and personal protective equipment that can adapt to a range of evolving biological and chemical threats,” said Ian Watson, DoD’s deputy assistant secretary for chemical and biological defense.

This new military approach to medicine is officially named the “Chemical and Biological Defense Program’s Enhanced Medical Countermeasures Approach”. The move involves the development of tests, treatments, and vaccines for a range of as yet unknown threats. Its introduction marks a shift in strategy for the DoD.

According to Ian Watson, “the change in approach has been shaped in large part by the Covid-19 pandemic. It can be impossible to tell whether a new threat is naturally occurring or intentionally manipulated by adversaries, but either way, the countermeasures are often the same”, Watson stressed.

Evidently, all along, there has been a US suspicion that Covid-19 is actually an escaped bioweapon. If that is the case, the close involvement of the military in our future medical services is a given. Military thinking is quite different from civilian thinking. Military thinking involves inevitable casualties. As Tennyson said ‘Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die’. With this in mind, it is no surprise that the medical profession has changed gear and now insists that nothing has gone wrong—excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated nations is simply the cost of final victory.

Biotechnology Doesn’t Work

The fly in the ointment of this wacky philosophy is the risk of biotechnology itself. Apparently, no one has informed the top military brass that biotech doesn’t actually work; it kills people, any people, whether they are friends or foes, Russian, Chinese, or American. Moreover, it is an offensive/defensive weapon like no other; once launched, it can’t be recalled, and it goes on killing people indefinitely.

It appears to me that the military is as much a victim of biotechnology misinformation as everyone else is. You can make money out of biotechnology whether it works or not, whether it helps or kills people. You simply have to keep the investment dollars, the government grants, and the military contracts rolling in. You do this by making wild promises that you can’t keep.

By the time it becomes clear that your product doesn’t work and actually harms people, you have a new product ready to go and a new set of promises. Technology moves so fast that the government, the medical profession, and the military can never catch up. They are in a state of constant fear driven by people writing sexy public relations drivel that arrives on official looking letterhead at everyone’s desktop. All at the push of a button. And the writers are very well paid to do so. They probably also write the scripts for fanciful quasi medical Sci-Fi epics that pollute our televisions with stories of miracle cures engineered by white coated scientists and hunky heroes. None of this exists.

In truth, the failure and risk of biotechnology is a dirty secret that is being kept from us. When trusting school children were told they needed to get the Covid vaccine in order to participate in school activities, no one told them that 17.1% would experience a cardiac symptom whose final outcome was unknown. No one told them that they were being signed up as subjects in an experiment. No one told them or their parents that they had virtually no risk from Covid infection but a measurable and significant risk subsequent to vaccination. No one told them that many medical professionals would ignore or dismiss them if they suffered vaccine injury. It is hard to escape the notion that school children have become cannon fodder in a secret war orchestrated by biotech dreamers and misguided military planners not too dissimilar from Dr. Strangelove.

Natural Products Regulation—An Overreach of Government Control

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Natural Products Regulation—An Overreach of Government Control

Civilisations come and go through the ages. When governments empower people, they harness the intelligence and creativity of their citizens for the good of all; when they seek to control their populations, they fall into decline.

Following three years of pandemic control, governments are not stopping there. Here in New Zealand, the government has introduced the “Therapeutic Products Bill,” which will control how products which appear to benefit health are manufactured, prescribed, imported, advertised, supplied and exported. According to Health Minister Andrew Little:

“It will enable New Zealand to take advantage of advances in medicine, such as cell and tissue therapies, emerging gene therapies, and the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning software. Having risk-proportionate approval systems will improve access to necessary and life-saving medicines, such as vaccines in a pandemic.”

An important part of the bill aims to regulate the natural health products used by more than 50% of our population. This is the third attempt of the Labour Party to introduce extreme regulation of the public’s options to choose their medical care, supplements and diet. Their earlier two attempts failed because of vocal public opposition. In 2017 Labour opted for a prohibited list of 300 common herbal ingredients ( for some of these see photo):

Control of Our Food Supply

It won’t have escaped your notice that many of these like Cinnamon and Mustard are currently sold in shops. So how on earth did they get onto a prohibited list? The answer lies in attempts to gain control of our food supply.

Natural products that are beneficial to health cannot be patented, but synthetic copies can be. To make this work, the products that grow in gardens need to be banned.

Labour and the Ministry of Health did not make this list up, the list was supplied by the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) of which Medsafe is a member. ICMRA is largely funded by the pharmaceutical industry whose interests they serve. You can read all about it in my book Your DNA Diet, available as a Kindle from Amazon or a hard copy from the Hatchard Report.

Labour says it has learned from prior public opposition. This time the Bill will not name any prohibited ingredients. Instead is an enabling bill, the type of legislation made famous by Adolf Hitler. The Bill establishes a new regulator headed by an independent statutory officer with a wide remit:

The new regulator will be responsible for ensuring the safety, quality, and efficacy of natural products. It will design and implement proportionate, risk-based market authorisation pathways. Its functions will include, in addition to market authorisation, licensing controlled activities, post-market surveillance, and compliance.

These services will be funded through levies on the industry which are liable to be costly. Government regulatory schemes mooted in the last two attempts were likely to push small players out of the market due to the cost of compliance, as happened as a result of the Food Bill.

Crucially the Bill also includes a range of modern enforcement tools allowing for a graduated and proportionate response to breaches, including tiered criminal offences, strict liability offences, improved infringement notices and a civil pecuniary penalty regime.

In other words, the Bill appoints a new, as yet, unnamed regulator who is being empowered to do whatever he thinks fit to control the manufacture and availability of supplements. He could and is, in fact, very likely to publish a list of banned herbal ingredients soon after his appointment. The list is ready to go from the ICMRA database connected to Medsafe, courtesy of the pharmaceutical industry.

If we wish to be able to continue to freely chose herbal medicines and supplements without government interference, we will need to speak up. Go to this link to make a submission before February 15th. Write to your MP and complain that the appointment of a regulator amounts to an open ended blank cheque to control the use of products used by more than 50% of our population without fully specifying the principles he should use.

Press release Therapeutic Products Bill introduced.
The Therapeutic Products Bill
Related Documents and Downloads

The Ardern Government is Throwing Money at the Media and the Fake Science Brigade

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Ardern Government is Throwing Money at the Media and the Fake Science Brigade

… in the Belief the Public Will Swallow Anything, No Matter How Absurd.

It is surprising what tripe you read in the newspapers, and more surprising—the government is funding it. Te Punaha Matatini hosts the government’s Disinformation Project, which is hitting the headlines again. According to Principal Investigator Kate Hannah (MA in history), the government should be allowed to dictate to high street stationer Whitcoulls which magazines it can sell to the public. Correct me if I am wrong but isn’t this a bit close to book burning?

Hannah is concerned that the magazine New Dawn has questioned the efficacy of the Covid vaccines (among other things like Atlantis and fake Moon Landings). I don’t read New Dawn, but if there is one thing that the public has figured out, it is the lack of efficacy of Covid vaccines. They don’t seem to prevent transmission, hospitalisation, or death.

During the last few weeks a number of papers have been published in journals outlining some of the many reasons why this is the case. A paper entitled “Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination” reports that after three mRNA injections B cells critical to antiviral immune protection switched to an IgG4 function. The immune system switches to an IgG4 function when it decides it wants to tolerate an allergen rather than fight it. Covid, however, is not an allergen; it is a replicating pathogen. Such tolerance explains why boosted people are slowest to clear Covid infections and can become subject to repeat infections. Read Q & A about it here.

Hannah is undeterred by such findings or concerns. Framed by a dramatic black background in a Stuff Newspaper video appended to an article, she explains to the public why we should only follow the government website Unite Against Covid-19. Her reasoning reveals the kind of anti-science New Zealand our government is planning. She advises against reading publications which:

  • Have lots of links and scientific references (like most science journals)
  • Come from a variety of sources from all over the world

Incredibly Hannah says even referenced data from the WHO and CDC should be treated with suspicion here in New Zealand. Instead, ask the government or talk to your GP. The government doesn’t just fund one link to information. Go to https://www.karawhiua.nz/frequently-asked-questions/ for example where in a mixture of Maori and English 16 year olds are urged to get a booster if they want to enjoy summer and everyone is advised to cease worrying if they get reinfected after talking Paxlovid.

In contrast, the Danish government advises the under 50s to avoid mRNA injections. Current research shows the risk of mRNA vaccine induced myocarditis exceeds the risks of Covid-19 infection, but as Hannah says: avoid overseas information. She feels this would constitute cherry picking (only citing findings favourable to your viewpoint).

The standard scientific way around cherry picking is to review all the available published articles on a topic. A paper published 28th December 2022 in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation entitled COVID-19 vaccine induced myocarditis in young males: A systematic review does just this. It concludes conservatively:

“..males younger than 40 receiving a second dose of an mRNA vaccine are at greatest risk [of myocarditis]”.

The paper also shows how some researchers hid the risks of myocarditis by averaging the data of 20 year old males with 80 year old women—a form of medical fraud motivated by pro-vaccine myopia and big pharma funding.

In another example, government website Unite Against Covid-19 advises:

“You can get the Pfizer vaccine at any stage of your pregnancy.”

If you steer away from the narrow boundaries of Kate Hannah, government websites, and The Disinformation Project, you might come across this journal paper published 30th December 2022:

“COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function” reports COVID-19 vaccines, when compared to the Influenza vaccines, are associated with a significant increase in Adverse Events including:

  • menstrual abnormalities
  • miscarriage
  • fetal chromosomal abnormalities
  • fetal malformation
  • fetal cystic hygroma
  • fetal cardiac disorders
  • fetal arrhythmias
  • fetal cardiac arrest
  • fetal vascular malperfusion
  • fetal growth abnormalities
  • fetal abnormal surveillance
  • fetal placental thrombosis
  • low amniotic fluid
  • preeclampsia
  • premature delivery
  • preterm premature rupture of membrane
  • fetal death/stillbirth
  • and premature baby death

(all p values were much smaller than 0.05). The paper concluded:

“When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or persons-received, all COVID-19 vaccine adverse events far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds…A worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy is advised.”

Curiously, Kate Hannah (MA in History), as well as rejecting out of hand the scientific references cited by those asking questions about mRNA vaccine safety, is not offering any references of her own, nor do experts like Michael Baker in their public pronouncements. Content to pontificate that their unseen references are better than yours, but I don’t have to show you mine because you are not worthy of seeing them (possibly because they don’t stand up to scrutiny, you might infer). A sort of school playground spat where you had better watch out because my father is bigger than yours.

Hannah applies some truly wonderful logic to her case. An article reporting the concerns of frontline hospital workers in the USA is dismissed because the author is not specifically qualified to write about frontline health workers. Can you get such a qualification? Presumably, Hannah has sufficient qualifications (an MA in history) to tell everybody what to do. As such, she appears to fit right into the current Labour government mould.

Probably you, like me, are tempted to laugh at Kate Hannah. Her depiction of proto-terrorists as fair-haired people who wear braids, grow vegetables, knit, and eschew Covid vaccines. So why is the government funding Kate Hannah (MA in History) to tell us what to think about Covid when we could be relying on published research in reputable scientific journals?

They are desperate. There is an election coming up. They are engaged in a last ditch stand to rally their remaining supporters around the fading and tattered mRNA banner that Ardern unfurled with trumpets and mandates back in 2021. They are ignoring the accumulating safety signals and throwing money at anyone who will stick with their failed Covid policies and experimental injections. Given the risks of serious injury and death, which increase with each successive vaccination, it is a kamikaze approach. Send your most fanatical followers to the front line, knowing they are risking all for a lost cause.

Don’t stop asking questions. If you have studied history (like Kate Hannah), you should be aware that whenever governments become your sole source of truth, things can go horribly wrong.

Photo by Thomas Coker on Unsplash

Hatchard Report New Year Message—Our Task for 2023

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Hatchard Report New Year Message—Our Task for 2023

Countering the coming tsunami of biotechnology

Jeremy Fleming, the head of GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters), one of three leading spy agencies in the UK, has publicly discussed that the agency wishes to promote “pre-bunking”—feeding the public with information designed to undermine narratives before they even appear on social media.

In other words, spy agencies originally tasked with monitoring events are now engaged in spreading propaganda about things that haven’t actually happened and probably have been doing so for a long time. They appear to be pre-empting the truth with their own imagined version of events.

Fleming described pre-bunking as a process of issuing ‘public warnings.’ This is, you will appreciate, a misuse of the term since the ‘public’ is not aware that they are listening to ‘warnings.’ They are being fed information or denied access to information without being told who is ultimately controlling the narrative. This is happening all over the world, as revealed by Elon Musk’s revelations about the role of the FBI in closely censoring Twitter content.

The pandemic has multiplied information actors with shady sources of funding and likely ties to government and big pharma, who are tasked with spreading pre-bunking narratives. Among these are a host of fact checkers. Full Fact UK presents itself as an independent fact checker located not a million miles away from Westminster and GCHQ with a host of funding sources, including Facebook, the National Endowment for Democracy, the International Fact Checking Network, and many others.

Part of Full Fact’s funding is specifically tied to, yes, you guessed it, vaccines. In an article entitled “No evidence rise in deaths due to unknown causes in Canada is linked to Covid-19 vaccines”, Full Fact reveals its pre-bunking role. It is concerned about the following sentence publicised on YouTube and shared on FB:

“In Alberta, Canada, unknown causes of death are causing even more deaths than heart disease, strokes and diabetes combined”

Full Fact doesn’t dispute that this is entirely true. It merely wants you to feel assured that there is no evidence these deaths were caused by Covid-19 vaccines—something that the creators of the YouTube source video do not actually assert. In other words, Full Fact wants to pre-empt any suggestion that the undisputed huge rise in unexplained deaths in Alberta, Canada (and presumably the many other highly Covid vaccinated nations suffering in the same way) is anything to worry about. That is a curious kind of manipulation of which GCHQ would no doubt be very proud. Just remember these are deaths in need of explanation, not inconsequential data sets that can be swept under the carpet.

Hypothetically …

So should we be concerned about statistically significant rising excess all cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries around the world and incidentally low birth rates in the same countries (see here and here)? Effects that are not being seen in nations with low vaccination rates, in Uganda, for example, as reported in this video. Yes, we should be concerned because the consequences of ignoring these trends would be catastrophic for Western civilisation (if such a thing exists).

Let us examine a hypothetical country of 5 million people with a previously stable population year on year. Each year 35,000 people die, and 35,000 babies are born. If annual deaths rise by 15% as they are in New Zealand for example, and births fall by 13%, as they currently are in Sweden, what would happen? In one year, 5250 extra people would die, and 4550 fewer babies would be born. A net loss of 9,800 persons in the population.

That is a net loss of 0.2% of the population size. So not too much to worry about then, or is it? Five thousand two hundred fifty extra deaths are 5250 people with families and jobs who died too soon—5250 tragedies. These are the figures for 2022. No one knows if these percentages will rise or fall in 2023. So far, they are steady or rising. Irrespective of the outcome, adverse events directly affecting individual well being and capacity to work are already a huge multiple of the number of deaths.

Medsafe safety reports indicate serious health outcomes could be as much as 1,000 times the number of deaths proximate to mRNA vaccination. We could speculate maybe a 100 times the number of excess deaths over a longer period. Scale that up to the whole world’s population and you would arrive at 8.4 million deaths along with an incalculable impact on global health, possibly 20% of the world’s mRNA vaccinated population affected with a significant health deficit—more than one billion people.

Why are People Dying and Falling Ill?

They are dying as a result of a new technology—mRNA biotechnology—which governments, big pharma, and the medical establishment are currently bidding to mandate widely for hundreds of conditions stretching into the future.

A February 2022 article in Nature lists 90 mRNA lead developers in the global vaccine landscape with 137 mRNA vaccines in the pipeline. You can bet your bottom dollar that number has grown substantially since. Commercial biotechnology experimentation is rife and cast adrift from rational considerations of human safety.

This represents a massive investment of money and personnel, an expectation of massive profits, and a speculative biomedical revolution aimed at the prevention and treatment of almost every illness. Expectations that are proving very hard to relinquish in the face of growing evidence of ineffectiveness and serious risk—risk of ill health and death. It is hard to comprehend why anyone involved would not be raising red flags.

Similarly, falling birth rates are a very serious concern. Biotech PR is busy pre-bunking this too, promising designer babies growing in pods for us all. A preposterous dystopian Brave New World future vision that has no basis in proven technology. Even a child can work out that an ordinary pregnancy and a family environment works efficiently with love and the immense personalised computational power of our physiology. Whereas even if baby pods did work (they don’t exist, except in the imagination of wannabe biotech profiteers) a whole army of biotech baby technicians will be absurdly expensive, mistake-prone, impersonal, and wholly frightening.

Nothing to See Here Carry On

In 2023 we are about to be engulfed by a tsunami of biotechnology involving an army of biotechnologists, their investors and supporters who are hoping against hope, like Full Fact UK, that we don’t notice how many people are dying suddenly for no recorded reason. They are busy along with thousands of other funded experts (???), pushing out the message that there is nothing to see here. They are hoping that regulatory agencies are going to approve their products at lightning speed with a minimum of scrutiny and fuss, as happened during the pandemic. In fact, the FDA has already flagged a speeded up process for mRNA look alikes—regulation lite.

The alternatives for wannabe mRNA billionaires are unthinkable. If biotechnology is fingered as the cause of the current wholly unprecedented rise in deaths and injury, their finances, reputation, and future will fall apart. Therefore they, like GCHQ, are incredibly busy pre-bunking to save their pet biotech projects from cancellation due to the risk of death and injury. They don’t care if you die as long as no one works out what you died of. Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the EU, USA, and the whole Western world are playing along by pretending, with the help of their spy agencies, that no one knows why so many people are falling down dead. They are busy hiding data, delaying investigation, and looking the other way.

If we don’t debunk and stop them very soon, they, along with the police, the courts, and our employers, will be breaking down our doors in 2023 and coming for us with deadly needles for every ill we don’t even have. Given the disastrous and deadly failure of Covid vaccines and lockdowns, this could only be described as a futuristic frenzy of psychopathic dysmorphia—a distortion of real appearances. It would make 2022 look like a cake walk.

Be Silent No More

Conversely, for us, the general population, the hoi polloi, if we put our thinking caps on, if we stand up and speak up with evidence, we could regain our life, choice and truth.

So our task in 2023 is to get this one message across: not just Covid mRNA vaccines, but biotechnology and gene editing, in general, is inherently risky and dangerous. It bids to redesign and therefore undermines the stable basis of physiology—DNA—built up over millions of years of evolution.

This is a task that can only be achieved if our efforts are global, if MPs, business leaders, senior civil servants, medical decision makers, and people of influence and common sense all over the world are approached, challenged, and re-educated. For this reason, in 2022 we founded a dedicated website: GLOBE.GLOBAL. You can visit now for more information and register for regular updates by email. GLOBE stands for a campaign for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation.

We have been producing articles in 2022 to publicise the inherent risks and outline the steps to rein in the deadly biotech juggernaut. In 2023 we will extend to podcasts and videos. Our reports aim to explain the results of complex research in terms accessible to the layman. These are intended to enable you to brief those in power and authority, in order to bypass the efforts of global commercial powers aiming to subvert the course of our health and our right to justice.

Biotechnology is a serial killer. A killer that has been identified by irrefutable evidence and now needs to be convicted and sentenced in the courts of ancient common law, public opinion, and fair leadership. We cannot leave this task to unnamed others or the vagaries of chance. It is up to us to get this done.

Ways to Support Guy Hatchard
1...192021...44Page 20 of 44

© hatchardreport.com. All rights reserved. Dr. Guy Hatchard is an international advocate of food safety and natural medicine.

Quick Links

Must Read

Popular Articles