At the height of the fear and panic about possible pandemic outcomes, there is no doubt people acted under a fight or flight psychology. Anyone familiar with emergency situations will realise what this means. You either meet the threat head on or you rush to the nearest exit. Everything is concentrated on self-preservation, you are looking to cling on to lifelines. There is little time to think it through.

The nearest exit rapidly became the development and eventual rollout of a ‘vaccine’, the most trusted and revered word in the modern medical lexicon. But this was no ordinary vaccine, it was using novel biotechnology whose eventual effect was little understood, but already known to be mutagenic. What lay behind the offered exit was largely untested and highly risky, but no one was prepared to admit this to the public. They still aren’t (we have written extensively on this at GLOBE).

Novel Biotech Vaccines Are Ineffective and Unsafe

Extensive research is now published indicating that the novel biotech vaccines are ineffective and unsafe, but the nature of the early information presented to the public, who were in a state of near panic, has been imprinted too deeply in the individual and collective consciousness to allow for doubt to emerge.

Over the last few months, a thirty year old social media personality has experienced a miscarriage, loss of health, and irregular menstrual cycles, her husband has had a heart attack, but hundreds of her followers have urged her to ignore anyone asking questions about vaccine safety. She has become caught in a network of irrational responses and a reluctance to question the safety of the so-called exit strategy. She is a victim of disinformation.

Unequivocal data shows she is not alone. Here in New Zealand and in many other highly vaccinated nations we have entered an era of record rates of excess deaths (up 18%); and hospitalisations including a high incidence of cardiac illness up 83%, strokes up 25%, miscarriage and stillbirths up 25%, and acute kidney injury up 40%. Cancer incidence is climbing. Yet the causes of these remain unaddressed in the media. People are suffering repeated ill health episodes, but due to saturation government advertising and media compliance, many still thank God they are vaccinated.

The gratitude of survivors to their rescuers is well known, it can last a lifetime. People maintain contact, and the shared experiences of escape become the stuff of legends to be passed down through generations. But what if the dangers were exaggerated, the causes obfuscated, and the eventual poor outcomes ignored, as they are being now?

Government Control of the Dialogue

An article published yesterday in the UK Telegraph “Covid disinformation unit made ‘hourly contact’ with tech firms, its leader reveals” indicates the extent of control the UK government exerted over information during the pandemic. A control that is still continuing today. The article reports that a career civil servant, Sarah Connolly is Head of the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU). Ms. Connolly has just admitted in testimony to MPs that the CDU was in contact with “almost all” social media platforms, and that discussions were “daily, sometimes hourly… to encourage…the swift take down of posts”.

The Telegraph reports these contacts were intended to curtail discussions about vaccine safety and discussion of controversial lockdown policies during the pandemic. Addressing MPs, she said that the most concerning types of anti-vaccine material included discussions about side-effects and the speed with which the vaccine was produced.

When asked about the CDU’s process for having posts removed, Ms. Connolly said: “If somebody from our cell says: ‘We are worried about this,’ that goes immediately to the top of the pile. Whoever it is, in whatever company.” In other words, since many scientific papers and leading scientists were raising these questions, she appears to be frightened by the normal process of scientific investigation and determined to control it.

The Telegraph reports that the UK Government confirmed last night that social media firms had taken action on more than 90 per cent of the posts referred to them by the CDU during the pandemic, often by deleting them or using AI algorithms to ensure they were not seen as widely. This is the modern equivalent of government-sponsored book burning.

The effect of these policies on media reporting was laid bare by current and former BBC staff who have told the Telegraph that, during the pandemic, a “climate of fear” existed within the BBC among those who argued that its reporting lacked balance, saying they were branded “dissenters” and were ignored when they raised their concerns about impartiality with senior managers. Staff were fearful of losing their jobs if they spoke up.

Sources told the Telegraph that Connolly took control of the Covid narrative like a puppeteer. CDU rapidly silenced respected scientists such as Dr. Alexandre de Figueiredo from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and many others, who argued against mass vaccination of children against Covid-19, questioning its need or safety.

There are fears that Connolly’s control at CDU indicates the close involvement of the UK intelligence services. Connolly’s CV notes she previously worked in the Home Office and Foreign and Commonwealth Office on a range of security and counter-terrorism policies. Were government ministers so poorly informed about a technical area that they became misinformation perpetrators in the hands of people used to enforcing agendas by any and every means?

In New Zealand We Are Being Left in the Dark

We too have a government Disinformation Project funded by the Prime Minister’s office whose staff appear to share political agendas and a lamentable deficit of scientific understanding. Crucially there have been no moderated public debates between those determining policy and those asking questions. There has been no cross examination of government experts in the courts. There has been free media access granted to paid proponents of biotechnology.

Two days ago Kathryn Ryan of RNZ Nine To Noon interviewed Michael Spector. According to Wikipedia, Spector has a degree in English and was formerly the New York Times Bureau Chief in Moscow (???). He has described the value of organic food and concerns about vaccine safety as ‘fictions’. He is now a New Yorker science writer and author of an adoring biography of Fauci whom he describes as “The Enlightenment’s human shield”.

Ryan was apparently ill equipped to ask scientifically probing questions of Spector. As a result, we were subjected to a barrage of disinformation, a sort of black comedy. Asked to define Covid vaccines, Spector replied “mRNA vaccines deliver the blueprints that tell the cells how to build the antibodies needed to defend against Covid. Once they do that they hang around for a couple of days then disappear”.

Anyone with even a modicum of Covid scientific knowledge would know that this is not just a simplification but a fiction. mRNA Covid vaccines override cellular processes and create copies of the toxic spike protein on the surface of the Covid virus. This circulates in the physiology where the immune system attempts to destroy it by creating antibodies. Spike protein has been found in the blood up to 28 days following vaccination and in some cases longer. It can cause a range of adverse effects on health including myocarditis.

The conversation between Spector and Ryan rapidly deteriorated into the wild imagination of genetic essentialism. The false idea that any desirable human trait can be engineered by editing genes. Spector suggested that we could make kids taller or play the cello better. These are laughable fantasies. Ryan jumped in to say we could make female possums infertile. Segue to a cure for cancer. If you want a more informative assessment of so-called miracle biotech cures read my articles “Genetic Essentialism and Biotechnology Experimentation” and “Speak up now, it is almost too late“

Or watch Professor Richard Dawkins answer actual probing questions about Covid pandemic science in this interview with Unheard on Youtube. Dawkins struggles to try to justify his earlier extreme moral condemnation of the unvaccinated, and eventually admits he got it wrong. In a convoluted defence, he blames politicians for wanting a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer when actually scientists didn’t know about the efficacy and safety of the vaccines or government lockdown policies.

Yes, you read that right, one of the world’s best known scientists publicly admits they didn’t know much about Covid vaccine efficacy or safety when they accused the vaccine hesitant of being killers. More than that, he now admits he and many others made the wrong call.

Let us return now to the hapless social media personality, suffering repeated bouts of unexpected ill health but assailed on all sides by her own pro-vaccine followers bolstered by government propaganda. She feels alone, but she is not actually alone, she is certainly misinformed about the extent of vaccine injury and quite possibly one of hundreds of thousands of severely vaccine-injured individuals.

There are key processes of data analysis that would help decide the causes of current unprecedented high rates of illness and death. Including analysis of vaccine status at the time of hospital admission and death, segmented by age and condition. This can be compared with historical data. Why are medical authorities around the world refusing to undertake this and even hiding data? Why are mainstream media not asking these questions? The present need is for rational re-evaluation.

Image Credit

Photo by Melanie Wasser on Unsplash

The World Health Organisation has announced an agreement with the European Union to develop a digital health certificate. WHO has stated that they will use the “EU Digital COVID Certificate” as a model to establish a global digital health certificate otherwise known as a vaccine passport (you can follow the reaction on Twitter here).

This brings to mind the conditions imposed on daily life during pandemic lockdowns which were enforced using vaccine passports. Restrictions on movement and participation which are now known to have had an overwhelmingly damaging effect on society. An article in the authoritative UK Daily Telegraph on 4th June headlines “Painful lockdowns a global policy failure that must never be repeated“. According to new research, we will be suffering drastic effects on the economy, educational outcomes, and mental and physical health for years to come as a result.

Now that the pandemic panic is subsiding, you may hope that this will not affect you or your family. Think again. The latest WHO initiative is one among many being promoted around the globe to restrict the freedoms of unvaccinated individuals.

In our backyard, the headmaster of prestigious Auckland Grammar School Tim O’Connor has written on 1st June to parents and friends of the School and spoken to the student body saying:

“It is our intention for all teaching and extracurricular programmes to be in person, with appropriate health and safety procedures in place”. Warning students that “personal health can affect their ability to attend and/or to actively participate in School activities”.

He announced that AGS has received advice from Public Health and medical professionals about the need for pupils to receive MMR shots and influenza vaccines. Mask wearing is also advised.

Mr. O’Connor appears not to realise that parents may have legitimate reasons to be concerned. He writes as if his audience is convinced of the need for universal vaccination and of its safety. He may not have read of the study conducted in Thailand on the effect of mRNA vaccination on adolescent boys which found cardiovascular effects in 29.24% of secondary school students, ranging from tachycardia and palpitation to myopericarditis.

He may not have read recently published studies including “Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine” which found not just zero effectiveness of the bivalent Covid vaccine, but an increased susceptibility to Covid infection following repeated vaccinations. Possibly Public Health and the unnamed medical professionals advising him have failed to share the results of these studies.

Is this a taste of what is in store for us all—removal of medical choice and restricted access to reliable information? Or could it be worse than that?

In 2020 during Operation Warp Speed something happened that possibly escaped your notice but its effects are just now altering everything we took for granted about the safety of medical interventions. Operation Warp Speed was the programme to develop Covid vaccines rapidly in the heated climate of fear surrounding the initial stages of the Covid pandemic.

The usual 10-12 year period of careful safety and effectiveness research evaluating new vaccines was cut short to a matter of months. You may remember something else happened after these initial months. All the control group who had been given a placebo were suddenly given the same mRNA vaccine as the experimental group. This meant the Pfizer study had no possibility of evaluating the long term effects and safety of mRNA vaccines. Pfizer documents released under court order now show that by this point more people had died in the experimental vaccinated group than in the unvaccinated control group, a fact that Pfizer tried very hard to hide.

Move forward now to late last year, the bivalent vaccine was developed and rolled out around the world. It had different ingredients from the original vaccine but its testing period was even shorter. You can see where this is heading, can’t you? The pandemic has legitimised wide scale testing of novel pharmaceutical drugs on the general public. Drugs whose long term effects are unknown.

WHO is fully involved in a push for rapidly updated vaccine types. See this article in the Atlantic “Fall’s COVID Shots May Be Different in One Key Way” which explains that the FDA’s advisory panel is expected to authorise an ‘updated’ Covid vaccine, something ‘experts’ described as “momentous, but wise”. In other words, we have become guinea pigs, unprotected by any standards of safety that ruled drug development before the pandemic.

The introduction of vaccine passports on a global scale is one more step in this direction. Someone at the World Health Organisation, closely associated with the highly profitable pharmaceutical industry, will be dictating which drugs and vaccines you need to take. These standards set up a framework which may restrict freedom of movement, access to education and employment. Public health officials, medical professionals, headmasters, employers, and many others will no doubt be enforcing these WHO standards by adopting their digital health certificate. Theirs will be unthinking decisions, they will be following the crowd without knowing where it is heading. Given their position and responsibility they should be looking carefully into research findings before acting, not relying on others.

No doubt many have been seduced by the constant barrage of articles appearing in the press which promise miracle cures through biotech medicine. A sobering assessment is given in an article by the BBC entitled “The quest for the era of personalised medicine” which says:

“The Human Genome Project was supposed to lead to personalised medicine tailored to our DNA. It’s finally happening, but it is proving more difficult than anyone could have imagined.”

Instead of ‘difficult’ they might have used the words ‘dangerous’ or ‘concerning’. The article recounts the story of five year old Mila who had a rare disease understood to be caused by a genetic defect. Her mother raised $3 million in 2017 to fund the development of a personalised medicine designed to block the function of the defective gene. This medicine called ‘milasen’, relieved some symptoms for a while, but they returned and sadly Mila died two years ago aged 10.

It won’t have escaped your notice that medicine costing $3 million per person is not a prescription for a sea change in global health. Indeed the long and informative BBC article repeatedly bemoans the massive and ultimately impossible cost of various genetic research initiatives, whilst enthusing about their potential. ‘Potential’ is the right word because the article fails to describe a single initiative that is actually working. Sadly, poor outcomes continue to dog genetic medicine.

Projects to monitor the genome of hundreds of thousands of babies to screen for genetic defects are underway in the UK and USA, but the treatments are not. Clinical trials of conventional drugs have a notoriously poor success rate, or rather a 90% failure rate and, even for those that pass, a very low effectiveness and a high rate of adverse events. Genetic interventions haven’t yet even been able to graduate from trials.

The article reports some health officials noting there are sometimes treatments available for genetic conditions that don’t involve personalised genetic testing and medicine, treatments that are cost-effective. This advice tends to fall on deaf ears when billion dollar genetic projects are on offer.

Remarkably, the article touts the very high incidence of sudden cardiac arrests as an opportunity to develop personalised genetic medicines. Ironically, the authors fail to realise that the incidence of such events has doubled during the era of mRNA vaccines.

The article concludes with a chilling statement:

“It is going to potentially require a different approach to the way drugs are tested, and some willingness to embrace risk.”

Who is going to adopt this risk—the general public of course. Will we do so willingly or will we be left misinformed of its full extent? Will we be forced to participate on pain of loss of employment or housing? It has happened before, hasn’t it? It is our job to ensure it doesn’t happen again. Don’t let these initiatives be introduced unchallenged. Speak up now, it is almost too late.

This article is available as a PDF file:
https://hatchardreport.media/pdf-files/speak-up-now-it-is-almost-too-late.pdf

Image Credit

Photo by Juliana Romão on Unsplash

Members of the Public Adversely Affected by Covid Vaccines May Be the Last to Hear About It.

In his book Structure of Scientific Revolutions Thomas Kuhn describes what happens when new experimental data contradicts the established scientific orthodoxy. According to Kuhn, there is a period of extraordinary science where new theories abound and compete with one another to explain the new findings.

This is often accompanied by an almost irrational effort on the part of the proponents of the discredited theories to cling to their old ideas. Even Einstein for example was vilified by a number of colleagues for more than a decade after his 1905 discoveries of relativity, quanta, and Brownian motion.

Eventually, controversy settles down, and a new broader scientific paradigm or understanding becomes widely accepted, one which explains the anomalous experimental results which precipitated the crisis.

We Are in the Middle of a Paradigm Shift

For seventy years it has been more or less accepted that DNA is a biological molecule that contains an almost alphabetical system of information storage like a giant manual which guides the development and operation of biological systems. This linear understanding underpins the development of biotechnology—the attempt to edit DNA in order to modify the operation of biology.

The era of biotechnology has reached a point of crisis where the current theories of DNA operation are proving insufficient to explain the proliferation of adverse effects of Covid vaccine technology. On the GLOBE website, we have discussed that DNA and its cellular functions form a biomolecular interface between consciousness and matter, necessitating a change of paradigm—a scientific revolution that must encompass consciousness within the scope of biology.

The crisis we have arrived at is intrinsically different from those in scientific history. The globalisation of information, the commercialisation of science, the overreach of political control into every aspect of everyday life, the involvement of military interests, the power of online media, billion dollar investment, and the pharmaceutical society all wish to interpret and influence scientific debate.

How is This Vast Competition to Control the Scientific Narrative Playing Out in Our Lives?

Ever since the Christchurch earthquake, I have checked my email and read the newspapers from around the world when I first wake up. I feel the need to know what is happening, you probably do too. Take this morning for example:

The BBC asks “Could ultra-processed foods be harmful for us?“. Two identical twins were given different diets which had identical nutritional profiles (the same quantity of fats, fibre, calories, nutrients, sugars, etc.), but one twin ate these via ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and the other through fresh ingredients. The UPF twin put on weight, and increased unhealthy blood sugar and lipid fat levels. The other lost weight.

The article references dozens of studies showing that UPFs increase the risk of developing serious illnesses like cancer, strokes, and diabetes. It discusses the possible causal role of various additives in UPFs like emulsifiers and artificial sweeteners. It should have also identified a major difference between UPFs and fresh foods—one has DNA and the other doesn’t—but it didn’t because current nutritional paradigms ignore genetics. Fresh foods we could say have more ‘genetic intelligence’ and availability of nutrients that the body can utilise to maintain health. I discuss this more fully in my book Your DNA Diet. Understanding this possibility will involve a paradigm shift in our concept of nutrition.

The UK Guardian’s Health Editor based in Chicago writes “Global ‘silver tsunami’ of older cancer patients is coming, experts warn“. The article reports that an aging population is likely to suffer from cancers at a rate that will overwhelm oncology care facilities. This may be true, but no current discussion of cancer incidence would be complete without discussing the fall in longevity, decline in population growth, and the rise in cancer incidence that the world has been experiencing since the start of the pandemic. As we have repeatedly discussed at the Hatchard Report and GLOBE, data shows cancer incidence is on the rise among all age groups, not just the elderly. Why?

Another article in the Guardian reports “AI could outwit humans in two years, says UK government adviser“. He suggests “You can use AI today to create new recipes for bioweapons or to launch large-scale cyber-attacks.” AI systems do not launch attacks on their own volition, they can only do so if they have been programmed by a human being. AI systems were used during the pandemic to promote biotechnology acceptance, helping to generate hundreds of articles, fake social media posts, automated fact checks, and advertisements. Powerful secretive lobby groups were controlling the content of mainstream and social media. AI was not the culprit here, massive commercial interests were at fault. They used AI to distribute distorted information.

A few days ago the NZ Herald reported “Number of antidepressants dispensed to children and teens jumps 53 per cent in five years“. The article talks about the concern psychologists are feeling about over prescribing of antidepressants by GPs, a familiar story you might think. The article prints a table of total antidepressant prescribing by year and age.

We calculated the percentage change by year. Up until 2021, antidepressant prescribing was increasing by a worrying figure of about 5% per year. In 2021 prescriptions to 1-18 year olds increased by 23% four times the prior rate, to 19-24 by 14% double the prior rate. Prescriptions to 24+ also doubled. 2022 increases returned to roughly historical levels. So what happened in 2021 to cause such a dramatic rise? You might say lockdowns, but then there were lockdowns in both 2020 and 2021. You might say Covid, but then there was very little Covid in New Zealand in 2021.

If you want to know why, examine the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System) in the USA. Jessica Rose queried the VAERS database with the keywords: “psych”, “schiz”, “halluc”, “delus”, “visions”, “voices”, “suicid” and “mania”, “dreams”, “seiz”, “conscious”, “memory” and “depress”. This yielded 54,905 cases clustered around younger age groups (similar age groups to those affected by antidepressant prescribing increases here in New Zealand). These figures are astonishing considering VAERS is highly under-reported. Yes, mRNA vaccines do have neuropsychological adverse effects, although you wouldn’t know it if you only read New Zealand newspapers.

One feature of the competition occurring during paradigm shifts is the denial and falsification of data. Vatican officials famously looked through Galileo’s telescope but still denied that Jupiter had moons which would have falsified their theory that planets are embedded in solid crystal. Looking beyond newspapers to scientific comment, Dr. Clare Craig pointed out in an article published by HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) that the NHS had drastically and retrospectively altered records of atrial fibrillation incidence. Why? One wonders who to trust. You tell me.

In another example, the UK Telegraph reports that the Conservative government’s Covid Disinformation Unit asked social media tech companies to remove articles it considered to be ‘potentially harmful’. This included any suggestions that lockdowns were ineffective and damaging. Yet a giant meta analysis by Johns Hopkins University and Lund University had already concluded in 2022 that benefits of lockdowns were “a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs”.

Finally on to one of this week’s published scientific papers. The European Heart Journal published a paper “COVID-19 vaccination-related myocarditis: a Korean nationwide study” This study of 44 million health records of vaccinated Koreans reported that 8 deaths of young people initially recorded as sudden cardiac deaths unrelated to vaccination, were actually caused by vaccine related myocarditis as shown by subsequent autopsy results. Sound familiar? Do you think the New Zealand press could learn from this? The study suggests that around 20% of confirmed cases of vaccine induced myocarditis are severe with long term health implications.

As we indicated in our most recent article, our government is continuing to promote Covid vaccination even though multiple studies show the bivalent vaccine has zero effect on the dominant XBB variant, and repeat vaccine doses even increase susceptibility to Covid infection.

In this release, we have argued that a paradigm shift is underway. A time of extraordinary science where competing theories and explanations for events and data are being considered. Unfortunately, as a result of censorship, the general public is unaware of the risks of Covid vaccines and biotech in general. Scientific debate is being suppressed. The Hatchard Report is committed to report on science publishing and bring the arguments and counter-arguments to the attention of the public.

Image Credit:

Photo by Dave Goudreau on Unsplash

An article “Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Bivalent Vaccine” has been published in the journal Open Forum of Infectious Diseases in their June 2023 issue. The study of 51,107 healthcare employees found that the bivalent vaccine was only a miserly 29% effective against the BA4/5 Covid variant which was in any case superseded by the BQ variant after which vaccine effectiveness dropped to 20%, and then, when the XBB variant began to dominate, effectiveness fell to zero. Yes zero, but not actually nothing; incredibly, repeated vaccination makes things worse.

This should be a familiar story. For decades, Coronaviruses have been well known to rapidly mutate and avoid vaccine protection. The fact that our government has launched an expensive promotional campaign to promote the bivalent vaccine, when it is proven to have zero effectiveness against the currently dominant XBB strain, speaks volumes about their incompetence.

But it is another finding of the study that is actually of far greater concern. The authors note:

“The risk of COVID-19 also increased with time since the most recent prior COVID-19 episode and with the number of vaccine doses previously received….The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID-19”

The authors describe this finding as ‘unexpected’, but then go on to admit three other large studies have found similar results (see here, here, and here).

The inescapable conclusion:

mRNA Covid vaccines increase your risk of contracting Covid 19.

This substantiates those arguing that Covid vaccines ‘imprint’ the immune system and limit its flexibility to deal with infection. In simple terms, the immune system becomes stuck with not just an ineffective response, but it steps backwards. In technical terms, the authors conclude:

“Immune imprinting from prior exposure to different antigens in a prior vaccine and class switch toward noninflammatory spike-specific immunoglobulin G4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination have been suggested as possible mechanisms whereby prior vaccine may provide less protection than expected….it is important to examine whether multiple vaccine doses given over time may not be having the beneficial effect that is generally assumed….The unexpected finding of increasing risk with increasing number of prior COVID-19 vaccine doses needs further study.”

You might think that this is the fact which governments and pharmaceutical firms most want to hide from the public, but you would be wrong. Quietly vaccine adverse effects have been piling up, hospitalisations increasing, and excess deaths rising. All at unprecedented record levels, but even this is not the most carefully hidden dirty secret. People have, after all, been figuring this out for themselves. Fewer and fewer people are taking the boosters because they obviously don’t prevent Covid infection. More and more people have been asking probing questions of their GP, because they don’t feel well.

The Biggest Secret Being Kept From the Public is the Use of Biotechnology Itself

Remember at the start of the vaccine programme, the government, pro-vaccine scientists and experts, the health department, the fact checkers, WHO, big pharma fact sheets and the media all took great pains to tell the public this was NOT an experimental vaccine. This was the biggest lie of all in need of near total protection from exposure.

It was important to everyone who sought to profit from the pandemic and the vaccines that biotech medicine should be seen as an extension of existing medicine. It isn’t.

When physics began to penetrate the nucleus of the atom, it was more than an extension of previous physics. The laws, the energy levels, the potential instability, and the nuclear particles all functioned under rules structurally different from those of earlier physics. Rules so different that the potential destructive outcomes dwarfed any previous man-made cataclysm. Since that time, nuclear technology has had to be guarded more carefully than any previous technology. The longevity and carcinogenic properties of nuclear waste and the threat of global annihilation have cast a shadow tens of thousands of years into the future.

mRNA vaccines penetrated, not the nucleus of the atom, but the cell wall and its nucleus—the very basis of life. mRNA and adenovirus vaccines are not mere extensions of modern medicine, they aim to redesign the cellular operation. Life begins with a single cell. The truly miraculous stability of human physiology and psychology was set to be altered.

It was already known that such interventions were mutagenic and highly risky, but against all common sense a decision was taken to press the launch button, not in a contained laboratory but in every country simultaneously altering every human life on the planet. It was essential for those seeking to profit from the new biotech era they have initiated, and remains essential, that the public should not know of the risks or the extreme novelty of what is being undertaken.

An analogy should make this clear. When a foreign power is seeking to insert their spy into the heart of a rival’s intelligence service, it is a time of the greatest sensitivity. No one must know what is being attempted. This action is going to place them in a position of superiority, and render their opponent’s intelligence ineffective. Until their mole is established, fully accepted, and above suspicion, it is vital that no one should suspect them.

Biotechnology medicine is a field that is conceived as a source of vast almost unimaginable profits. A field that will supersede much of conventional medicine and render it obsolete. The United States, UK and many other nations believe that their long term economic future and global superiority is intimately tied to the development, implementation, and promotion of patented systems of biotechnology medicine. A lot is at stake. Hence no one must know just how premature its implementation is and just how risky.

Biotechnology is a step far into the unknown, way too far. Scientists do not actually know how cellular genetic structures and functions support human consciousness, health, and development, yet they have been prepared to risk all this in a global spin of the roulette wheel. The ball has already come to rest on the wrong colour, but it is essential that no one knows, because like hopelessly addicted gamblers, the same scientists, corporations, and misinformed political hacks wish to spin the wheel again,…and again, ….because they are blinded by their own hubris, convinced that in the end they will win back their losses. But you cannot recoup human life.

Next time you read in the paper about the wonderful future of biotechnology, spare a thought for the cautious scientists who have found that mRNA vaccines are not just ineffective, they make things worse. They are gradually finding out just how terribly bad it could become. Biotechnology experimentation needs to be banned, the evidence is available now, the dirty secret is out of the bag.

The British Heart Foundation (BHF) has announced that the incidence of atrial fibrillation has increased by 50% over the last decade. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a condition which causes an irregular and often rapid heart rate. It can lead to stroke and heart failure. The BHF did not release any supporting figures by year which might point to a potential cause. Watch Dr. John Campbell describing as ‘astonishing’, both the huge rise in AF and the lack of detailed data.

Here in New Zealand heart disease is at record levels, but politicians of all parties are repeating again and again, along with their expert Dr. Michael Baker, that there are no excess deaths. As if repeating a lie will be enough to make it come true. However, the official tally of OECD statistics shows that in 2023 New Zealand deaths are running at an astonishing 18.2% above the long term average. The second highest rate among 31 OECD nations.

This doesn’t appear to matter one whit to our politicians who remain confident they are one source of truth, fully in control of mainstream media, backed by the medical establishment, able to censor social media, protected from the courts by parliamentary privilege, and not required to answer any questions.

It probably hasn’t escaped your notice that all these are recognised characteristics of cult leaders who systematically manipulate their followers and seek to exercise total control. To say that cults do not end well would be an understatement. Once your followers are sufficiently prepped to ignore fact, any crooked and perverted manipulation becomes a possibility.

Once indoctrinated, it is difficult to persuade cult followers they have been duped. Leaders ensure that every event that runs counter to their ideology is neatly fitted into their world view whether based on fact or not. It becomes especially damaging when the force of law is used to ensure compliance and eliminate redress.

You can hardly avoid news of sudden onset illness or unexpected deaths in the daily newspapers or among friends, but there is always an innocuous sounding cause on offer. If considered rationally, the unprecedented number of unusual deaths would render these excuses implausible. However, cults don’t do rational.

Quietly Disaster Has Been Creeping Up on Us

This brings us to a rather sad realisation—with all the elected political parties complicit in Covid policy, it is almost ludicrous to believe that the coming election will change anything. Prepandemic, our current situation was almost inconceivable, but quietly disaster has been creeping up on us.

Published in 2020, an article in Harvard University Health Publishing gives us a hint. Senior Editor Robert Shmerling argues that it is not possible or even practical as a medical practitioner to be guided by “to do no harm” as the Hippocratic oath suggests, instead saying:

You can’t tell ahead of time whether a test or treatment will ‘do no harm’.

In other words, it has become widely accepted in medical practice that adverse events are inevitable and unpredictable. This is an argument that seeks to justify the irresponsible push for risky and dangerous biotech medicine and experimentation at any cost.

So what will change minds? When you look at Ponzi schemes, dictators, and cults, the answer is always the same. They end when total disaster strikes. Just how high will excess deaths have to rise before the powers that be accept that a giant mistake has been made?

Inside the Covid cult there are a few cracks appearing in the safe and effective narrative. It has quietly become acceptable for doctors to privately advise their patients that they might be vaccine injured, for pathologists to advise the children of friends that they should avoid Covid vaccination, for vaccinologists to say they won’t be getting any more boosters. These are small steps that indicate a direction of change, they also indicate that those at the health frontline know that something has gone radically wrong.

However, the political and media endorsement of biotechnology remains near total. Given the weight of Covid science publishing, there is no justification for this.

The suggestion that New Zealand’s pandemic policy has been world beating is a hollow lie, pandering to notions of national pride and allegiance. Like the medicos who think it is impossible to “to do no harm”, politicians are actually denying the obvious. By doing so they are tacitly endorsing inevitable deaths in the course of policy. This is a very militaristic, self-obsessed, and flawed way to think—glorious sacrifice—“Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die”.

Pandemic policy has stolen our bodily autonomy and our right to medical choice. It has overruled nature’s design of immunity and health. It has debased truth, substituting government pronouncement. It has seized control of children from families and whanau. It has inserted propaganda into education. It has rendered employees subservient. It has cancelled dialogue.

In short, it has taken the world in which we thought we lived and turned it upside down. It is no good thinking this is a battle between right and left. That too is a story to keep everyone distracted from the real issues. It is a question of what kind of fundamental individual rights can we retain? Rights that we previously took for granted.

By framing the world as vaccinated vs unvaccinated, political power backed by pharmaceutical money has redrawn ideological boundaries along the lines of novel biotechnologies. This is a giant act of deception that completely ignores the transhumanism involved.

When I was growing up, we gave thanks for the harvest. The modern age has joined in the cult of biotechnology, this seems to offer supremacy over nature, but it hasn’t worked. To succeed, to know, to enjoy you have to work with nature.

The hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program. Which means that if you choose to buy the book mentioned in the next paragraph, we may recieve a small commission at not extra cost to you.

I have just finished reading “The History of the World in 100 Plants” by Simon Barnes. Barnes concludes: we are descended from the biodiversity and bioabundance of plants. “Look at this planet and its uncountable plants. We owe them everything”. Taittiriya Upanishad confirms “life-breath is indeed food.” We depend entirely on the natural world around us, yet biotechnology is seeking to overthrow this mutual interdependency and substitute a ephemeral figment of man’s imagination and pride—an impossible dream and a hideous nightmare that puts our continued existence at risk.

Voting for today’s crop of politicians is a forlorn hope, it is a blank check for continued biotechnology experimentation on ourselves. It is a licence to adulterate our traditional food sources and place them in the hands of unscrupulous biotechnology megacorporations.

There may be ways to restore individual health. Plants are our evolutionary forebears. They supported and helped create the genetic stability that we have enjoyed until today, hopefully, their intelligent use through diet and herbal traditions can help restore public health. A precondition of progress is the recognition of mistakes, the cessation of biotech vaccines for humans and animals, renewed protections of pure natural foods, and a recognition of their role in maintaining health.

This is not a time to give up our rights, and hand them to the same politicians who have already laughed at medical choice and mocked those suffering serious adverse events, who have run roughshod over our Bill of Rights. They don’t deserve our vote. Under their leadership it could all begin again.

A study of data from 1.5 million subjects in the US healthcare system reveals an increased risk of blindness over two years following mRNA vaccination.

Updated: 6:00 PM 22 May 2023

Fortunately, many people are waking up to a multi-billion dollar web of self-interest promoted by our government, the health establishment, the pharmaceutical/biotech industry, and legacy media…. but not everyone. True to form, the NZ Herald this morning leads with a lament, apparently only a minority of eligible New Zealanders have risked taking the bivalent vaccine.

In support of its call to vaccinate yet again, the Herald article cites a study published by Cambridge University Press which looks at “Inequities in COVID-19 Omicron infections and hospitalisations for Māori and Pacific people in Te Manawa Taki Midland region, New Zealand”. A close look at the study reveals now familiar deficiencies that we have discussed in the pages of the Hatchard Report before:

• As expected, the definition of ‘unvaccinated’ is anyone who is actually unvaccinated + anyone who had a single dose. The paper should be tossed in the bin for this alone.
• The paper doesn’t specify whether or not they consider someone vaccinated in the first week after receiving their shot, but probably they are using Ministry of Health definitions which discard the crucial first week of data following mRNA vaccination thereby omitting adverse outcomes.
• Many people were admitted to hospital for causes unrelated to Covid between February and May but still tested positive. This factor was only removed in early July when they started filtering for unrelated morbidities.
• The study data time frame was February to June 2022. This was an interesting period. ‘Efficacy’ against Covid hospitalisation and mortality started in favour of boosters, but crossed over by May as the vaccine efficacy wore off and then entered negative territory. In other words, after May 2022 boosted individuals had a higher chance of Covid infection and death than the unvaccinated. The study would have got a very different set of results if they had considered May-September as well or instead.

If you take a broad sample of recently published research, it seems avoiding repeated Covid vaccination could be a very significant and safe choice.

Increased Risk of Blindness Over Two Years Following mRNA Vaccination

A very large and carefully specified study published in prestigious journal Nature of US healthcare data involving 1.5 million subjects has found that your risk of developing retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) doubles within the two years following Covid vaccination when compared to unvaccinated individuals (see here for a detailed explanation of the study findings by Dr. Mobeen Syed).

The results are especially alarming because all categories of people whose health history and drug use might lead to a propensity to suffer from RVO were excluded from the study. The two groups of vaccinated and unvaccinated subjects were matched by age, sex, race, comorbidities, medications, and previous hospitalisation. In other words, the results point very clearly to a doubling of risk for those receiving mRNA vaccines.

The retina is the layer of tissue at the back of the inner eye that converts light images to nerve signals and sends them to the brain. Retinal vein occlusion is a blockage of the small veins that carry blood away from the retina. It is most often caused by the formation of a blood clot which blocks the flow of blood through the retina and causes severe damage to the blood vessels and the retina itself.

Retinal vascular occlusion involves the loss of sight in the affected eye; in simple terms it leads to blindness. Many people suffering from retinal vascular occlusion do regain some vision naturally. However, vision rarely returns to normal. There is no known intervention to reverse or open retinal vascular blockages. Older people are especially vulnerable to retinal vascular occlusion, the same people our government and Te Whatu Ora are vigorously targeting to take another Covid shot.

It seems Te Whatu Ora is suffering from selective blindness itself. It is so keen to promote its vaccine uptake strategy, that it is not keeping up to date with the increasingly long list of concerning mRNA Covid vaccine adverse effect studies, and certainly not informing the public about these risks.

So What Sort of Blood Clots Develop as a Result of mRNA Vaccination, and How Do They Form?

Considering that the incidence of heart attacks and strokes has increased dramatically, you would think that funded research could prioritise research in this area, but in the post Covid vaccine era, you would of course be wrong. Everyone involved with promoting biotech vaccines is busy looking the other way.

This article contains microscopy photos of unusual blood clots found in the arteries of suddenly deceased individuals. They contain relatively large fibrous, crystalline, and wire-like structures, not the cellular agglomerations of typical blood clots. These cannot normally be observed until autopsies are performed. Micro clots are another type of risk.

The retinal vascular occlusion study suggests mechanisms for micro clot formation, including molecular mimicry of the Spike-protein and/or heparin suppression. Heparin is the factor which prevents platelet aggregation or micro clotting. The retinal arteries and veins are unusual in as much as small pathogenic micro clots forming in the blood can be directly observed in the eye. Moreover, their effects are immediately apparent to the patient and the treating physician. This opens a possible window into the study of the formation of blood clots following mRNA vaccination and their treatment.

Increasingly the New Zealand government’s Covid policy looks blinkered, defensive, and deceptive. Last week, the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC) released a tender for a major contract to provide ‘insights to build an empirical picture of the disinformation landscape.’ The newly appointed disinformation Tsar (at a cost of $450,000), whoever they are, will do well to look into the government itself. It might have become the principal source of misinformation in the nation.

According to Mintel, which styles itself as the world’s leading Market Intelligence agency, 2023 is the year of “hyperfatigue”—a state of continual physical, emotional and mental exhaustion. In a recent UK survey, 35% of people said they were too tired to make healthy changes to their diet and activity levels, suggesting many are in a vicious circle of fatigue-induced self-sabotage, leading to more fatigue.

Cancer Research UK, estimates that 40% of all cases of cancer could be avoided if more people lived healthier lives, for example by eating more healthily, being active, maintaining a normal weight, avoiding sunburn and not smoking, but we’re not taking their advice. Basically, we’re too tired to tackle our tiredness.

So what has made 2023 so unusually fatigued? Might it have something to do with an infectious disease almost certainly created in a laboratory possibly as part of a bioweapon development programme along with a misnamed vaccine, also created in a biolab, that doesn’t work and appears to make people sick? You tell me.

There are an increasing number of unwell people suffering from conditions which studies show might be caused or complicated by mRNA vaccination, but the government is keeping quiet and relying on hyperfatigue and its own one source of truth doctrine to prevent people looking any deeper. We recently heard from a young acquaintance who informed us of their heart disease diagnosis. They remained not just uninformed of the possible cause, but also reassured by government advertising that Covid vaccines are safe.

You don’t have to look very far for a cause these days. A Japanese paper published last week outlines the case of a man who developed myocarditis immediately after the administration of his fifth shot. Hospitalisations are at record levels, our health system is under siege, …..and winter is coming.

Corrected and updated: 14 May 2023

We have arrived at a point in an election year when our votes matter, so expect some surprising replies to our emails and even some answers to our questions. BUT, if today was anything to go by, it won’t be without fireworks.

Yesterday, I fact checked David Seymour, who, in his Reality Check Radio interview, had asserted very strongly that New Zealand has had no excess deaths. I used the statistical graphical interface from the Human Mortality Database run by the University of California and the Max Planck Institute in Germany to generate charts to illustrate Seymour’s misunderstanding. This interface queried the same official data as Our World in Data referred to by David Seymour.

Once you factor in the absence of seasonal flu in 2021, these charts illustrate very clearly that New Zealand has had elevated rising rates of excess deaths beginning in 2021 and continuing since.

Clinging to Total Lunacy

However, David Seymour and Rachel Beauchamp, his Executive Assistant, wrote to a number of correspondents this morning (12 May) rejecting the information I posted. David stood by his assessment that deaths in New Zealand were below historical averages. In fact, a little bit more than that, David said that anyone who clings to the idea that mRNA vaccines killed anyone is in his words “clinging to total lunacy” (???).

In February, the New Zealand Herald, that bastion of mainstream Covid orthodoxy, published an article entitled “New Zealand records biggest increase in registered deaths in 100 years” The Herald article referred to 2022 mortality figures.

From the headline, it won’t have escaped your notice that the excess deaths have become so large that even the Herald wasn’t able to ignore them, but politicians apparently can. So who are the lunatics now?

The Herald article did its best to downplay the significance of so many people dying:

It began its statistical sleight of hand by comparing 2022 to 2021 rather than the historical average of deaths.

Then mentioned that 2020 had very low deaths because border controls and lockdowns kept seasonal flu and respiratory illness at very low levels. That is true, but it forgot to mention that the same controls and no flu conditions applied to most of 2021 as well.

A Lot of People Are Dying

Was it just a selective memory that made David forget that the Herald had published the official record of elevated excess deaths? Should we expect the Ministry of Health to warn politicians about the elevated number of people dying? Or have they been making sure that the concerning data has a low profile in order to protect themselves from criticism? Is it all going very wrong for the Covid vaccination lobby? Are they panicking? What do you think?

No worries though, the Herald called in that well worn epidemiologist Michael Baker, who for the first time seemed to admit that something might be going wrong. Rather than claiming, as he has previously, that New Zealand has no excess deaths, he started reminiscing about the great success in the initial years of the pandemic, (presumably 2020 when we had no Covid, no vaccines, no flu, and very few doubts about Michael Baker).

In his email, David Seymour asserted that New Zealand has negative excess deaths (less than expected from historical trends). The fundamental of this assertion is that if you average the very low death totals from 2020 with subsequent years, you can make the excess deaths in 2021, 2022, and 2023 look a lot less concerning.

This cumulative averaging of deaths used by Michael Baker, tends to hide what is really going on. In fact, unexplained New Zealand excess deaths are getting larger year by year since 2020. It also avoids facing the fact that hospital admissions are also getting larger year by year and disproportionately affecting the vaccinated. Like the rise in deaths, hospital admissions began to rise in 2021, before we had Covid, but after we had the vaccine rollout, despite the relative absence of seasonal flu.

The Elephant in the Corner of the Room is Becoming Too Large to Ignore

We have reached a point now where the elephant in the corner of the room is becoming too large to ignore. The record-breaking mortality figures from 2022 were complicated by the high number deaths recorded as Covid related. These have tailed off in 2023. Therefore the continuing high rate of excess deaths is doubly concerning.

Have we entered the phase of political disbelief, when it becomes clear that something has gone terribly wrong, but no one wants to accept responsibility? In which misdirection and finger pointing become routine responses.

David Seymour wants us to doubt our sanity. Public health should not be a political football, it is a matter of life and death. Right now, while death is getting the upper hand, no one in authority wants to accept responsibility or do anything about it.

New Zealand is not alone. Overnight the UK Mirror published an article ‘Brits are dying in their tens of thousands – and we don’t really have any idea why‘ It continued:

“Tens of thousands more Brits died than usual from May to December 2022, excluding Covid as a cause of death, raising serious questions as to why so many died”. 

It described the figures as “shocking.”

Professor David Coleman, Emeritus Professor of Demography at Oxford University, told the Mirror:

“a lot of Brits are dying, but not necessarily of a specific cause”. 

After talking to the experts and considering everything from hot summers to obesity to dementia to flu to old age to demographic changes, the Mirror concludes:

“This still leaves tens of thousands of dead Brits, with no clear explanation as to quite how they died”.

New Zealand Excess Deaths 18% Above the Five-Year Average

Just as in New Zealand, the high level of excess deaths in the UK is continuing unabated. The week ending April 21 2023, the Office of National Statistics reported excess deaths were 21% above the five year average. That is 2540 excess deaths in one week alone. Currently, in New Zealand, 2023 excess deaths are running at 18% above the five year average, a very comparable figure.

For two years we have been writing about published scientific research containing evidence of increased illness related to Covid vaccination—cancers, heart disease, myocarditis, kidney disease, strokes, neurological illness, etc. These are all conditions with long term implications for health and longevity. We seem to be facing these consequences now, but the government and the health authorities are looking the other way.

The level of polarisation around the issue of Covid vaccine safety is highly concerning. This is a time to carefully examine the excess mortality and hospitalisation data by age, vaccination status, and disease category. Instead, we are finding that considerable efforts are being made to ensure data is hidden from the public. It is especially concerning to find the leaders of New Zealand political parties continuing to push the idea of vaccine safety in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary.

Please continue to speak up. The more sane voices we can raise, the greater the chance of someone finally taking these excess deaths seriously.