A preprint paper published this month, shows that IgG4 antibodies are present in the umbilical cord blood of infants born to vaccinated mothers, highlighting a theoretical risk to newborns of an ineffective response to Covid infection. This highlights just how many unknowns we are dealing with when it comes to assessing what will be the long term outcomes of mRNA vaccination.

BUT was this really unknown to those recommending that mRNA vaccination was safe for pregnant women? Documents released by Pfizer under court order reveal that Pfizer and the FDA were well aware of clinical trial results indicating appalling outcomes for babies of pregnant women.

Watch this 20 minute video where dozens of so-called New Zealand experts are recorded telling us that the mRNA Covid vaccines are completely safe for pregnant women in direct contradiction of Pfizer trial results available in April 2021. These indicated an unfolding disaster for babies, including miscarriage, premature birth, cardiac arrest, toxic breast milk, spike protein crossing the placenta, etc.

In the video, their comments are juxtaposed with scientists exposing the highly disturbing content of the Pfizer trials of pregnancy outcomes.

Was the New Zealand Government Aware of This Information?

Certainly, the contractual arrangements that our government had made with Pfizer would have required Pfizer to fully inform the Ministry of Health of all the results of vaccine trials.

BUT the Ministry of Health has completely ignored the information which has become public knowledge. From 1st May 2023, they are again encouraging pregnant and breastfeeding mothers from 16 and up to get a further booster shot. Why? Especially considering the increased incidence of miscarriages and stillbirths since the New Zealand vaccine rollout began.

I can’t imagine at this point in time a more important video to watch than this 20 minute film of our experts lining up to misinform prospective mothers of safety. Were they misled by Pfizer, by the Ministry of Health, by politicians, by the FDA, or by all of the above. OR did they just decide to promote a safety rating without even any evidence to back up their statements? We may never know, but the lesson of this video is clear, we will not be able to trust the medical czars again.

Ardern’s government had an emotional response to the crisis and a mistaken understanding of science, which led to multiple vaccine-induced deaths.

It requires a deep dive into published scientific literature to assess why scientific opinion about Covid vaccines is still polarised, despite the growing evidence of serious harm. Bear with me while we enquire how this happened with reference to an exemplar condition—stroke.

The leaked Wellington Region health data shows that the incidence of strokes requiring hospitalisation in 2023 was up by 25% on pre-pandemic levels. These rises in stroke incidence began in 2021, before the arrival of Covid in New Zealand, but after the vaccine rollout began. Despite this, published scientific papers continue to point to Covid-19 infection as the sole source of increased stroke incidence, in some cases, as in this paper, not even mentioning a possible role of Covid vaccination.

Accordingly, New Zealand Medsafe has been able to continue to maintain there have been only two incidences of vaccine induced deaths; allowing Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and others to cling to the fiction that Covid vaccination is safe.

Are Young Adults Dying Following Covid Vaccination a New Source of Viable Organs?

A pre-pandemic 2016 paper found that victims of fatal strokes are generally robust sources for organ transplant donation, especially if they are younger in age. The one exception was the need for caution with livers transplanted from those dying as a result of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) whose recipients suffered poorer survival outcomes.

This paper published in April 2023, describes a single case of a person who suffered a stroke in October 2021 caused by Covid vaccination whose organs were harvested for transplant. The paper notes in passing that:

“Thrombosis combined with thrombocytopenia generally occurs in the first month following vaccination and can lead to fatal outcomes, even in young, previously healthy individuals. These young adults ultimately may become solid organ donors.”

In other words, young adults are dying following Covid vaccination in sufficient numbers to be appreciated by transplant surgeons as a new source of viable organs. In this single case, two harvested kidneys are still functioning well for the recipients. The authors leap from the one case study to a general conclusion:

“Kidney allografts transplanted from vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia donors can have a good overall function with favorable outcomes”

A September 2022 paper reports on kidney transplants from 16 (yes, 16) victims of Covid vaccine-induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT) to 30 organ recipients in the UK. 5 of the recipients (17%) had concerning test results following surgery and 2 of them lost the graft. The authors conclude “The involvement of VITT could not be completely excluded in one of these cases.” They go on to describe these outcomes as favourable (???).

This paper published in August 2022 studying four successful transplants from a single deceased donor following VITT, notes:

“There are increasing reports of thrombotic complications with various COVID-19 vaccines such as the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA, Moderna mRNA, AstraZeneca Oxford (serum institute), and Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccines.”

Kidney Transplantation From Deceased Donors With Vaccine-induced Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia: Definitely Feasible and Safe

This paper from Italy reports two cases of vaccine-induced thrombosis and thrombocytopenia (VITT) and subsequent successful transplants, but this letter to the editor of the American Journal of Transplantation in July 2021 presents a far more concerning picture. Of 13 consented deceased donors likely to have died from VITT, 10 actually donated 27 organs in total. 3 of these organs subsequently failed, 2 had impaired function, and one patient died of a cardiac arrest. In total there were seven major thrombotic or hemorrhagic postoperative complications among 6 recipients (22%) within 9 days of transplant.

The authors concluded that the potential risks of transplanting organs from donors with VITT are twofold. First, early major thrombosis or clinically significant bleeding. Second, possible transmission of pathogenic lymphocytes (anti-PF4), characteristic of blood clotting associated with strokes.

In other words, VITT deceased donors may somehow pass on aspects of their vaccine-induced fatal illness to transplant organ recipients.

This additional case report presents photographic evidence of a kidney from a VITT victim in preparation for transplant showing clear evidence of tissue death and bleeding in the kidney that may be associated with the vaccine induced injury that caused a stroke that was actually concentrated in a completely different part of the physiology.

Transplant Surgeons Are Very Excited to Have More Available Young Donors

You are probably beginning to get the picture aren’t you? Transplant surgeons are very excited to have more available young donors, they announce that the use of organs from VITT is probably viable based on some case studies with very mixed results, but completely fail to comment on the significance of the increased number of cases of vaccine induced death. Incredibly, our government insists only two people have died as a result of Covid vaccination.

Transplant surgeons are narrowly focused on their discipline. Despite being aware of increases in Covid vaccine induced death, they wrote papers which failed to sound the alarm. But it is worse than that, medical authorities, the people who collate statistics of hospitalisation and death, failed to communicate to medical personnel and specialists in disparate fields that there were many categories of vaccine-induced illness, including not only strokes, but also cardiac disease, kidney disease, reproductive disease, cancer and neurological disease.

Now imagine yourself in the position of ED doctors, nurses, GPs, specialists and other medical professionals. Like the transplant surgeons, they almost certainly did see an uptick in specific conditions they were personally treating, but they were rushed off their feet as usual helping patients and were never given information about the big picture by those with access to the summary hospitalisation statistics. Instead, they were repeatedly told the novel biotech vaccines were safe and effective beyond any doubt.

Questioning Vaccine Safety a One-Way Ticket to De-registration

Unbelievably, they were given to understand that questioning vaccine safety was disinformation and therefore a one way ticket to de-registration, loss of employment, income, and career prospects. None but the most principled and well informed, would have gone down that route.

There were other reasons why alarm bells never rang. Doctors are trained to look for specific conditions and offer treatment accordingly. The idea that a vaccine might lead to a general collapse in immune system function giving rise to a wide range of conditions probably never would have occurred to most busy frontline staff. They wouldn’t have connected the dots.

In 1972 I attended a conference at Kingston University in Canada at which Hans Seyle, the inventor of the modern concept of stress spoke. Dr. Seyle explained that stress was the non-specific or general response of the physiology to any strain placed upon it. This illustrated how psychological or physical pressure or overload could evoke general deficits in health. This and other research has led to an understanding that cells network together to maintain health on multiple fronts. In fact, trillions of coordinated biochemical actions are instituted by the body everyday to stave off threats to its health.

Seyle recounted that he invented the concept of stress when he noticed that sick people he treated had something in common—they all looked ill. They were suffering from multiple symptomatology with a single cause—stress.

mRNA vaccines breach the cell membrane in millions if not billions of cells. They effectively reprogram and retask cells. Each cell is a network member. Anyone familiar with network theory will realise that Covid vaccines could degrade the network efficiency of the whole physiology and its immune response.

We are suggesting here a generalised response to Covid vaccines that might leave the door open for multiple vulnerabilities to develop unchecked. In other words, a general mRNA vaccine syndrome characterised by a number of conventional diagnoses appearing widely distributed in the population. This is exactly apparent in the leaked Wellington Region health data—greatly elevated levels of cardiac problems, kidney disease, strokes, reproductive issues, and cancers. Individual published studies we have discussed at the Hatchard Report also include neurological conditions.

Leaked Data Supported by Some Medical Professionals

Since first releasing the leaked data a week ago, I have heard from a number of practising health professionals. Their reports include descriptions of unprecedented increases in the incidence of rare conditions that they would not normally see including cancers.

There are also reports of test result scores that are off the chart, for example, D-dimer scores in the 20,000 to 30,000 range. D-dimer tests are designed to monitor the formation of blood clots associated with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and stroke. All conditions whose incidence is increasing. It is notable that the leaked Wellington Region health data reports around 4% of D-dimer test results for both men and women are registering at elevated levels.

Most health professionals and the public are still being left in the dark as far as the overall data picture is concerned. When you hear politicians like Ardern and Hancock calling for more censorship of discussion, it has to ring alarm bells. Politically controlled censorship of health data availability is entirely inappropriate and without historical precedent. The history of science shows that knowledge and understanding progresses through rational debate. Often the final outcome of scientific debate might be radically different from the first theories advanced.

Francis Bacon (1561 – 1626) is often termed the father of empiricism. He argued for the possibility of scientific knowledge based upon inductive reasoning and careful observation of events in nature. His ideas contributed to the emergence of the scientific method. He wrote:

“Reading maketh a full man; conference [debate] a ready man; and writing an exact man.”

Ardern, Hipkins, Bloomfield, and Hancock would do well to revise their insistence that people forsake independent investigation or comment, and rely on the government alone for information. Such an approach doesn’t hold up under scrutiny.

For More Than Three Years We Have Been Living Through a Time of Crisis

During such periods in human history, people have an emotional need to adhere to a moral stance and ensure that others also follow, but it is also the case that crises are usually accompanied by a confusion of misinformation.

In line with her crusading pandemic policies, Jacinda Ardern has been appointed (no longer online: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/jacinda-ardern-announces-new-role-with-harvard-university/) to three tech-governance leadership fellowships at Harvard University. Ardern will be lecturing students and studying ways to alter content standards and platform accountability for extremist content online.

Possibly she would approve of the agenda of UK MP Matt Hancock, formerly the public face of the Covid pandemic, who has supported an amendment to legislation that would prioritise censorship of statements questioning vaccine safety and make them a criminal offence. 

Both Ardern and Hancock believe that we (the public) have not learned lessons from the last two years, where, according to them, health misinformation had a devastating impact. Notably, Hancock has blocked any comments on his Twitter post—an indication of what might be in store for us all.

Government Policies Are the Real Drivers of Health Misinformation

The revelations of widespread ill health contained in the Wellington Region data leak demonstrate how the reverse is true. Government policies restricting access to health data and suppressing open debate are the real drivers of health misinformation and poor pandemic health outcomes.

As we revealed in our recent release at the Hatchard Report “NZ Government Formulated Policy Contrary to Evidence They Had on Their Own Computers. Why?”, early evidence of severe Covid vaccine harm in 2021 prior to the arrival of Covid was ignored. A range of serious illnesses including heart attacks, myocarditis, and acute kidney injury led to greatly elevated hospitalisation rates. It is apparent that only people occupying senior positions in the health service or government like Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, who worked closely with Ardern, had access to this data, but they kept the information completely out of public view. Why?

It seems that Ardern’s all consuming dedication to Covid vaccination arose under a quasi scientific and political umbrella that had an international dimension of interference and control. At the time, Covid vaccination was presented as not just the best option, but the only way to avoid a health catastrophe. We now know that this was highly misleading. mRNA vaccination was not safe and effective, nor did it avert a health catastrophe, but Ardern continues to advise us that it was the best choice.

Vaccine Adverse Effects Officially Labelled as a Conspiracy Theory

In contrast, there were highly qualified researchers and doctors on the international stage like Mike Yeadon, formally a vice president at a Pfizer research division, Dr. Robert Malone, who did early work on mRNA technology development, and many others who were warning of potentially serious outcomes of the new vaccines, such as cancer and immune dysfunction.

However, pharmaceutical interests, science publications, governments, and medical authorities moved rapidly to cancel these voices and sideline them as attention-seeking conspiracy theorists. Here in New Zealand, vaccine adverse effects were officially labelled as a conspiracy theory. To this day, Medsafe has only admitted that two fatalities have been caused by mRNA vaccination out of hundreds of deaths reported proximate to vaccination. And not only that, unprecedented rates of excess all-cause mortality is predominantly affecting the vaccinated.

The risk of vaccine-induced death is real and by now well documented as the sequence of transplant publications and Wellington Region health data show. There are a plethora of other studies linked in previous Hatchard Report articles. I realise it is hard to come to terms with an increased risk of death and possibly easier to ignore the personal implications, but the need to halt further Covid vaccination programs is surely evident.

Hoping That the Problem Will Dissipate or Go Away is Not a Rational Response

Hoping that the problem will dissipate or go away is not a rational response, nor is doubling down on vaccination. Each additional shot increases the risk. This study of health care workers for example found that the bivalent vaccine currently being offered in NZ actually increases the risk of adverse reactions.

mRNA vaccines were initially described as 97% effective. They are now known to reduce Covid infection rates for as few as 1 in 100 recipients. Nor do they stop transmission. It now appears they are associated with multiple serious adverse effects and deaths at rates never observed with traditional vaccines.

It appears the health authorities we were told to trust exclusively were themselves inadvertently spreading misinformation, while many of those being wrongly fact-checked, accused of conspiracy, and cancelled from social media were telling the truth.

Ardern and Hancock were leading figures promoting censorship and guiding public pronouncements of safety. Do you think they deserved the authority they wielded or do you think the Bill of Rights should have taken legal precedence, allowing us freedom of medical choice and information?

One of our subscribers forwarded yesterday’s article “NZ Government Formulated Policy Contrary to Evidence They Had on Their Own Computers. Why?” on the Wellington Region health data leak to their local New Lynn MP Dr. Deborah Russell, Minister for Statistics and Associate Minister for Justice. Surprisingly, he received a very prompt reply.

Dr. Russell cited an opinion piece from Bloomberg (a US magazine, not a scientific publication) in support of her contention that New Zealand has had negative excess mortality for “the last few years”. She suggests that this article illustrates that “the vaccine has not caused deaths and in fact has prevented them”.

The article said no such thing, and I don’t know why Dr. Russell would make the elementary mistake of linking to an article whose main substance appears to run contrary to her assertions.

During the last three years New Zealand has had negative excess mortality in only one year—2020. Covid vaccination was not offered in 2020, and there were very few sporadic cases of Covid infection. Therefore Covid vaccination cannot have had any effect on reducing deaths in 2020. For this obvious reason, the Bloomberg piece does not in fact suggest that vaccination had anything to do with the reduced mortality in 2020. It says that New Zealand’s remote geographic location, border closures, and lockdowns instituted by Jacinda Ardern reduced the incidence of influenza and prevented Covid entering the country. It also notes that these policies had a huge negative impact on New Zealand’s economy.

New Zealand Excess All-cause Mortality is Around 15% Above Historical Trends

In every subsequent year, 2021, 2022, and so far in 2023, New Zealand has had excess all-cause mortality. Recent figures indicate it is running around 15% above historical trends. These figures are consistent with and supported by the leaked hospitalisation data. In the Wellington Region, the number of heart attacks resulting in hospitalisation has increased by 83%. Hospitalisation for myocarditis up by one third (33% increase). Miscarriage, stillbirths, and strokes are all up by a quarter (25% increase). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is up by 40%. The incidence of some cancers is also markedly up.

The social conditions and government pandemic policies applied in 2020 were completely different from those applied in 2021, 2022 and 2023. Conflating the statistics from all four years together in order to come up with some kind of average mortality report card doesn’t make any kind of statistical sense. Moreover, by 2023 it is not disputed by anyone that New Zealand’s health outcomes have declined markedly from historical pre-pandemic levels and crucially are becoming steadily worse. The question we asked is WHY?

Dr. Russell is the Minister of Statistics but chose to bypass answering any of the specific alarming rises in hospital statistics discussed in our articles (see here, here and here). This is disappointing, her Statistics and Justice ministerial portfolios suggest she ought at the very least to investigate and ask questions about unprecedented elevated rates of illness which are overwhelming our health service personnel and degrading the standard of care and health outcomes—both an injustice and a statistical anomaly.

Instead, Dr. Russell launched into an attempt to denigrate my academic qualifications and my right to comment. So this is the kindergarten level game she wants to play. I am surprised she would do so without first communicating with me or checking her facts. She asserted “He claims to have a PhD in Psychology” and said that the awarding institution “is not recognised by the American Psychological Association”.

For the Record

For the record, I have an undergraduate degree in Logic and Theoretical Physics from the University of Sussex. A post graduate diploma in education from Canterbury Teachers College, Christchurch. My MA thesis was in mastery learning in mathematics. I obtained my PhD from Maharishi International University (MIU) founded in 1973 in Fairfield, Iowa, USA. MIU is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission (HLC), the accrediting agency for universities and colleges in the North Central region of the US. The Higher Learning Commission is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA).

MIU does not currently offer programs in Psychology, I believe it ceased doing so in the early 2000s. It has received specialized accreditation for its business programs through the International Accreditation Council for Business Education (IACBE). Its graduate programmes have an outstanding job placement record and personal satisfaction ratings.

Professional associations are not in fact university accreditation bodies as Dr. Russell appears to imply. They can ‘endorse’ particular courses, but the American Psychological Association would not have had any reason to endorse MIU Psychology courses at any time in the past because the courses were never clinical in nature, they are research-based as was my PhD work which used panel regression analysis and time series analysis to analyse social indicators.

Also for the record, I was the keynote speaker at the annual conference of the British Psychological Society on crime in 1996. My research into the effects of meditation on health and well being is published in peer reviewed journals. I have a long standing association with the biotechnology testing and safety industry and was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID.

You can draw your own conclusions about the efforts of the current Government to deflect any criticism of their ongoing Covid policies. To silence debate, they appear ready to ignore alarming statistics and quash any open discussion or dissenting voices. This is politicking at its worst, seeking to displace rational science with the misinformed and strident demagoguery of parliament. We need to leave this behind.

It is all the more deplorable because people’s health is at stake. The Hatchard Report is asking for a rational debate to address the causes of the health crisis that is sinking our national health service. People who have fallen sick or lost loved ones deserve answers, treatment, and recompense. The health service itself requires emergency support to meet the evolving crisis.

Who Will Step Up to the Plate?

The Minister of Statistics and Associate Minister of Justice responded, but failed to address the key data. The situation requires cool heads and calm minds, people need to step back, avoid personal attacks and political prejudices. The data is too alarming. Don’t reach for an emotional response, reconsider the facts. We all love New Zealand and we are all hoping for the best outcomes for everyone. There is nothing wrong with asking questions and seeking answers. In times of crisis, you have to deal with the information that is in front of you. The leaked Wellington Region health data raises completely new issues to be considered with the utmost attention to detail and the implications for future health policy. It appears clear that the Covid vaccine rollout needs to be paused, pending this investigation.

New Zealand Health Data Leak:

In the last quarter of 2021 Ardern, Bloomfield, Hipkins and the medical Czars formulated policy contrary to the evidence that they had on their own computers. WHY?

On December 15th, 2021, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health, sent a letter to District Health Boards (DHBs) belatedly warning them for the first time that there was a chance recipients of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine might develop myocarditis—a deadly heart illness. Apparently, Bloomfield decided to downplay the risk saying:

“the overall rate of this event in New Zealand is reported to be around 3 per 100,000 vaccinations”

The Leaked Health Data From the Wellington Region Tells a Completely Different Story!

By September 2021 the incidence of myocarditis had increased by

• 13% among 20-29 year olds
• 15% among 30-39 year olds
• 11% among 40-49
• 14% among 50-59
• 19% among those 60+

There were a total of 444 additional cases of myocarditis between 1st January and 30th September 2021 compared to the same period in 2020 in Wellington Region alone.

By the end of September, approximately 40% of the Wellington Region population had received at least one dose of Covid vaccine. The population of the Wellington region is 550,000, 40% of that is 220,000. 60% of these people had had two doses, this means the total number of vaccinations was around 350,000 in the Wellington Region by the end of September 2021.

Therefore the increase in the rate of myocarditis was sufficiently serious to warrant medical care for around 127 recipients out of every 100,000 vaccinations. 42 times higher than the 3 in 100,000 Bloomfield quoted to the DHBs. The risk Bloomfield announced was sufficiently low that it hardly caused a ripple among hospital staff, some of whom continued to advise the many people reporting symptoms of myocarditis that there was nothing to worry about—just take an ibuprofen and go home.

Was Bloomfield misformed? Was he simply unaware of what was going on in his own hospital system? Was he mistakenly trying to avoid a panic? Was he hoping it would all go away if he reported lowered data? Or was it something else?

Just remember by September 2021 there had been very few Covid cases in New Zealand, almost none. So he couldn’t blame the increases in myocarditis incidence on Covid infection as others like Dr. Michael Baker have tried to do since. Bloomfield was in charge of the health service, and there would be an expectation that the Director General of Health would keep the Minister for Covid-19 Response, Chris Hipkins, and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern fully informed about what was actually going on. Especially as a novel biotech vaccine was being rolled out. At the time, he was conferring with both of them on a daily basis. Where did he get his 3 in 100,000 figure from?

Did the Government Encourage Bloomfield to Minimise Risks?

The policy ramifications of Bloomfield’s failure to review or share the Health Board’s own real life data proved to be deadly for every age cohort who, as a result, were misinformed about the risks and repeatedly told that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine was ‘safe and effective’. It wasn’t. And there were more deadly policy failures.

By September 2021, Wellington Region hospital data shows there had been 18% more heart attacks among 50-59 year olds and 29% more among the 60+ age range. A total of 359 more heart attacks than in the same period the previous year before the vaccine rollout. In other words, there was an unprecedented, statistically improbable rash of cardiac illness affecting 50+ year olds. Covid hadn’t begun to affect the population of Wellington by that time. Incredibly the government failed to reverse its policy to prioritise the vaccination of this older age group. WHY?

In addition, hospitalisation for kidney injury was up for all 30+ age cohorts. Alarm bells should have been ringing.

It should have been apparent that a lot of people in the second half of their lives were going to face serious health episodes, including fatalities. These could have been avoided.

Was Bloomfield erroneously speculating that vaccination was the lesser of two evils? Was he thinking that Covid infection would prove to be more deadly. Possibly, but he should have known by then from overseas data that Covid vaccination was not preventing infection or transmission. He also should have known that Covid was far less deadly than first suspected.

According to the accepted standards of medical safety, Bloomfield should have paused the vaccination rollout pending investigation.

The government’s own 2021 data readily available in the fourth quarter showed incontrovertible evidence of serious vaccine harm unsullied by any degree of Covid infection. There could only have been one cause—mRNA vaccination. The government should have been warning the rest of the world, since New Zealand was in the unique position of being free of Covid infection. It had a source of clean data to assess vaccine safety. Instead, the government decided to coerce universal vaccination of the whole population.

• In early October, they introduced vaccine mandates on pain of loss of employment.
• They launched saturation advertising encouraging young and old to vaccinate, guaranteeing absolute safety and effectiveness.
• They allowed private employers to sack unvaccinated employees.
• They funded the media to support their Covid policies and warned the population not to look further than the government for advice.
• Crucially the Prime Minister’s office funded a new unit called The Disinformation Project tasked with discrediting anyone who was asking questions about vaccine safety.
• They set up agreements with social media companies like YouTube to exclude content originating in New Zealand critical of Covid vaccination

On December 17th, I received a letter from Astrid Koornneef, Director of the National Immunisation Programme, who was replying on Ashley Bloomfield’s behalf to my letter to him of 28 October 2021 raising concerns about vaccine safety. Incredibly, the reply asserted that

“an accurate measurement of all adverse events [following vaccination] is not required”

The letter also attempted to overthrow a foundational principle of causality:

“the temporal association of adverse events with vaccination is not indicative of a causal relationship”.

In other words, by mid December 2021, despite the growing epidemic of heart and kidney illness among the vaccinated, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, in my opinion, seemed to be in complete denial of the accepted standards of science and health safety. The government was not going to admit that mRNA Covid vaccination was harmful even at the cost of honesty, science, and truth.

They were prepared to abandon the foundational principles of civilization in order to avoid censure. They were prepared to misinform citizens about the health risks of Covid vaccination. To this day, their motivations remain obscure. They have never had to face any questions from the public, the media, or opposition parties, who have meekly acquiesced to misleading publicity generated by the government and its paid experts.

At this point in time, the elevated levels of all cause mortality currently running at 17% above long term averages are the legacy of our government’s pandemic policy.

Yet the terms of reference of the current Royal Commission investigating the government’s pandemic response specifically exclude any consideration of vaccine safety. The government is still trying to cover its tracks and avoid any recriminations.

Yesterday, an old friend visited us after a 2 year gap. He wanted to know why I foolishly got involved with vaccine conspiracists. He has had four shots. He questioned whether the government could have any possible motivation to lie to the public. He also told me that, unfortunately, he has been given just four months to live after his cancer flared up.

This type of personal story has become common in New Zealand. There is no way of knowing whether his cancer has been affected by vaccination. However, the leaked Wellington Region health data shows why these stories are becoming more common. An epidemic of vaccine harm is in progress. Read previous data leak releases here and here for information.

No doubt my friend, in fact the whole nation, deserves a straight answer to simple questions, especially where the health of family members has already been affected, or life cut short, and for those who could suffer in the future:

What possible motivation is there for the government to lie to the public?

Is this gross incompetence or deliberate obfuscation?

When is this madness going to be stopped?

When will governments stop pouring money into biotechnology research which is subjecting so many people to unnecessary risk?

mRNA vaccines haven’t worked, in fact they are dangerous.

Friday’s release: “Te Whatu Ora Are Hiding the Alarming Figures—a Tsunami of Illness” has raised a lot of questions. What exactly is to blame for the overwhelming rise in illness across multiple categories?

Recap: Leaked data from the Wellington Region shows the number of heart attacks resulting in hospitalisation has increased by 83%. Hospitalisation for myocarditis up by one third (33% increase). Miscarrriage, stillbirths, and strokes all up by a quarter (25% increase). Acute kidney injury (AKI) up by 40%.

There are well over one million papers relating to Covid published so far. When compared to each other, many of these offer conflicting conclusions or suffer from methodological limitations. Therefore it is becoming increasingly necessary to monitor up-to-date data. The rise in hospital admissions across many illness categories in Wellington Region will have multiple causes. The question is what are the weightings of the potential causal factors? These can only be adequately evaluated through analysis of current data.

The Hatchard Report and others have been calling for the release of relevant data for almost two years now. Missing data includes vax status at death and on admission to hospital by age and disease category. Without this, no adequate assessment of the relative importance of Covid infection and vaccination can be made. The main thrust of many articles at the Hatchard Report is to request the release of this data for independent scrutiny.

Here are some of the probing questions we have received following our summary of the data leak and our answers:

Question 1: I am concerned that your assumptions around the analysis of data are not scientifically based and you are pointing to the COVID 19 vaccines as being THE reason why the deaths have increased. You failed to look at a number of other probable reasons for this (see 2-5 below for suggested alternative explanations).

Answer: This paper links elevated death rates in Europe to Covid vaccination. It calculates that a one percentage point increase in 2021 vaccination uptake was associated with a monthly mortality increase in 2022 by 0.105 percent (95% CI, 0.075-0.134). A very large effect.

---

Question 2. Is Long Covid at fault? This paper states ‘Long COVID is an often debilitating illness that occurs in at least 10% of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections’.

Answer: Some commentators want to blame prior Covid infection and subsequent incidence of Long Covid for the entire problem. There are two central questions here. ‘How much different is the effect of Long Covid compared to post influenza?’ and ‘Does Long Covid itself have multiple causes?’ A bombshell Norwegian paper published subsequent to the Nature article referenced above found no significant association between prior covid infection and long covid among adolescents. This substack article contains a discussion and a link to the paper itself. This finding suggests that many of the symptoms of Long Covid may have multiple causes including the effect of lockdowns, Covid vaccination, and prior health conditions.

---

Question 3. Delays in going to see a doctor, particularly under the lockdowns. According to the NZ Herald, this meant that some cancers, for instance, became far less treatable as a result.

Answer: Delays in going to a doctor during lockdown will have certainly had a serious effect on cancer outcomes, but not on long term cancer incidence rates. This effect should be disappearing by now, but it isn’t. The observed effect size is too large to be explained by delayed doctor visits and scans, see my discussion here.

---

Question 4. Aging baby boomers will be overrepresented for years to come in the death rates annually, they’re starting to die off as is the natural step at the end of a long life, ref: paper.

Answer: The paper on death rates cited is out of date and statistically irrelevant to the very high death rates we are now seeing which alarmingly include working age cohorts. Reference Edward Dowd’s book on this point.

---

Question 5. You might also include the fact that the whole health system is breaking down, we hear this all the time from nurses working at hospitals. This will be impacting health outcomes in a multitude of ways, as I’m sure you would agree.

Answer: I agree that the health service is breaking down, but why is it doing so? We have a chicken and egg situation, work loads have increased dramatically but why did they do so in the first place? The increased rates of illness came first. Remember we had Covid vaccination in NZ before we had Covid.

---

Question 6. I thought you always verified your data through official channels. How can you be sure these leaked figures are reliable?

Answer: The detail contained in the leaked information is notable. I have also received independent information confirming the size of the increases in illness from insurance industry insiders. One source from a very large health insurer reports health claims have risen from 4-500 per day to 700+ per day, a 50+% increase. Another insurance insider reports that claims for rare or unusual illness categories are inexplicably rising. At this time I have no reason to doubt the leaked data.

---

Question 7. Is there any other data pointing to a causal connection between vaccination and elevated illness rates?

Answer: Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn’t normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood. Leaked data shows troponin tests conducted on men and women shortly after Covid vaccination in the Wellington Region found high levels in 4% of men and 1.4% of women. There were other concerning levels of biological markers of illness reported in the leaked data, these included markers of cancer and blood clots.

---

An 83% increase in hospitalisations for heart attacks should be a statistical impossibility

An 83% increase in hospitalisations for heart attacks should be a statistical impossibility, but it seems it is happening. Cardiovascular events impact longevity outcomes. Cardiovascular disease is already the leading cause of death in New Zealand accounting for around 10,000 deaths per year. I can’t imagine why we are not reading about the increases in mainstream media. This must be impacting families all over NZ. I can’t imagine why the government and medical authorities are turning a blind eye.

It is Not Scientifically Tenable for Te Whatu Ora to Project a Facade of Normality

One of the most alarming take homes from the leaked data is the increasing rate of illness year by year—it is steadily getting worse. The authorities are evidently aware of this, but they are doggedly sticking to a ‘nothing to see here’ narrative. Nor are they doing the basic research to assess whether this is disproportionately affecting the vaccinated or the unvaccinated.

New Zealanders are falling ill and dying in record numbers unaware of a possible connection to Covid vaccination. Te Whatu Ora holds data pointing in this direction, but they are looking the other way and keeping quiet. Worse, they are encouraging people to get more vaccine doses. Withholding concerning data from public view and comment is reckless, inexplicable, and completely disregards public health and safety.

An anonymous source has sent me some internal data from the health department. I am feeling as if stuck in the first few chapters of a dystopian novel. People are mysteriously falling sick and dying in large numbers.

Everyone is looking over their shoulders and wondering if they are next in line. Slowly the realisation dawns that perhaps the authorities themselves have a dark secret they are trying to hide.

Excess deaths have been running at unprecedented levels for well over a year, hospital admissions are also at record levels, and the health service is overwhelmed.

For months we have been asking for data by disease category and vax status. From what data we do have, it appears that the vaccinated are being affected disproportionately.

Against the evidence, the authorities and their experts stubbornly maintain that it must be due to Covid infection, rather than vaccination. They are calling for more mRNA vaccination, not less.

The leaked figures are from the Wellington Region, which contains approximately 10% of New Zealand’s population. Presuming they are accurate, the hospital admission figures verify that the health of the population is getting progressively worse:

The Number of Heart Attacks Has Doubled

The number of heart attacks has doubled, yes doubled. How bad is that? Hospitalisation for myocarditis is up by one third (33% increase). Miscarriage, stillbirths, and strokes all up by a quarter (25% increase). Acute kidney injury (AKI) up by 40%.

If this is being repeated across the nation (a reasonable assumption), in the year April 2022 to March 2023 alone, there will have been 14,600 additional hospitalisations for heart attacks, 9,700 additional cases of myocarditis, 8,200 additional cases of kidney injury, 1,600 additional miscarriages, 1,800 additional stillbirths and 10,500 additional strokes.

The Incidence of Some Cancers is Also Rising

This is the kind of data that Te Whatu Ora and the government have been withholding from the public, but it doesn’t stop there. The incidence of some cancers (which take longer to develop) is also rising:

There is Nothing Ordinary About These Figures

I want to emphasise that there is nothing ordinary about these figures. They are so far above known trends as to be entirely without any precedent. I am assured that these are official and correct, although I cannot independently confirm them.

However, they do mirror the officially published rises in New Zealand’s excess deaths, so I have confidence in their veracity. They are also at levels similar to those overseas. So I feel it is in the public interest to release them. Te Whatu Ora has these figures. Why have they not released them?

Why Are We Not Reading About These Figures in the Media?

Every attempt is being made to normalise record levels of illness and death by ignoring them. Why? And it is a big WHY.

There is no doubt now that mRNA vaccination is disrupting immune function. This is not a conspiracy theory, it is a simple matter of scientific fact.

We have been discussing this for a couple of years now in multiple articles and referencing scientific publications on the topic. To what extent this is causing the tsunami of illness is not precisely known.

This needs to be investigated, but the huge embarrassment involved in admitting fault has apparently led the government and Te Whatu Ora to withhold the figures rather than openly discuss them or even make them available to independent researchers.

Which Political Party Has the Intestinal Fortitude to Stand Up and Start Discussing This?

If you live nearby, you can hear the rescue helicopters and the ambulances making their way to Wellington Hospital day and night with increasing frequency. Now we know what is really happening. The question now is, what political party is going to have the courage to start talking about it?

The media have been publishing human interest stories about rare cancers and tragic sudden deaths affecting individuals, but they haven’t added up the tally. Now we know we are in a fight for survival. The question is which media outlet is going to have the courage to start discussing this?

Medical authorities have been swamped with a tsunami of illness, but their response has been to deregister doctors who asked questions about mRNA Covid vaccine safety and raised the alarm about health data.

Presumably, they have thought if they withheld figures, the incidence of illness would decrease, but it isn’t, is it? It is getting worse. The question now is:

When are they going to come clean and admit that biotechnology at the heart of mRNA vaccines is inherently dangerous and needs to be stopped?

Next, I am going to be examining what is going on behind the scenes in the pharmaceutical research community funded by governments. Products under development are truly frightening. The scope and extent of experimentation is rapidly widening. Increasingly, this is interfacing with our food sources.

Meanwhile, this release needs to be circulated as widely as possible. Inform your friends that health workers are beginning to get very worried. They are breaking ranks to share alarming hospitalisation data. This affects all of us—our children, our whanau, our co-workers, and our elderly. It affects the health and wellbeing of the whole nation.

Today’s education, politics, science, medicine, and media have failed us. Pandemic policy has changed the rules and distorted the truth.

Like you, I am always hopeful of better times ahead—changed minds, enlightened government decisions, court battles won, compensation paid, and safeguards restored—but we have not been through a minor glitch in the course of our long history. It has been a major catastrophe. We have crossed into uncharted territory.

Look at this world map of Covid vaccine uptake published by the New York Times. Three quarters of the world’s population have received at least one dose. Excess all-cause deaths are rising in these populations. The unvaccinated are a minority group mostly sprinkled among the world’s vaccinated. The only exceptions being Africa and few remote, troubled, or isolated nations.

Those in the majority are in authority and they are unlikely to blame themselves or doubt their own wisdom.

Take this thread encouraging masking, the main take out seems to be ‘glue your mask to your face’. This is not even parody and ignores results of recent studies on the dangers of mask-wearing.

Or this alarming tweet about mRNA vaccines in plants and animals entering our food supply unlabelled.

Or this letter from Rob Zorn, Communications Advisor of the NZ Nurses Organisation, falsely claiming that “the choice not to vaccinate [against Covid] has serious potential repercussions for the wellbeing of others”. In fact, the latest research points squarely to the harms of Covid vaccination, including unprecedented rates of excess all cause mortality continuing to disproportionately affect the highly vaccinated (see here or here for example).

Or this article reporting the continuing relentless efforts to permanently exclude doctors who sounded a note of warning about Covid vaccine safety. This is going on all over the world driven by commercial pharmaceutical interests.

Or this paper published by NIH announcing that all 23 participants with neurological damage following Covid-19 vaccination recovered. In fact, they didn’t all recover. To reach their misleading conclusion, the authors changed the meaning of ‘recovery’ from that commonly used. Watch this earth-shattering video from Dr. Mobeen Syed, who interviews one of the participants who explains she still has to undergo an invasive medical procedure every two weeks costing $3500 and remains incapable of work. Yet the study falsely claims her condition is ‘resolved’.

The common thread joining all of the above is the rejection of obvious truth and precautionary science, followed by an attempt to manipulate public opinion to develop the acceptance of fallacy as truth, and fact as conspiracy.

Many who are concerned are advocating political solutions or applications to the courts, but if we imagine we will be welcomed, believed, listened to, or helped when we go cap in hand to politicians, the courts, medical authorities, or the media asking for justice or truth, we are misplacing our trust. At this point in time it is easy to despair of progress. It seems we have to find another way ahead.

Technology Has Overtaken the Natural Order at the Core of Existence

In every ancient culture, there are myths that warn against upsetting the natural order. Icarus, who flew too close to the sun, and Actaeon, who should not have pursued Artemis. Or the sons of Sagar who delved too deep into the earth and upset the four mythic elephants who supported it. All these myths and many others point to a need to refrain from interfering with fundamental principles of natural law or usurping their power and authority.

There are three foundational principles of life unknown in antiquity that have become vulnerable to modern technology:

• The Cell with its genetic core, the very basis of life.
• EMF Communication Frequencies, identical with those used by physiology to precisely guide developmental biology and the brain
• Atomic Nuclei whose chain reactions can destroy planets

Add to these a fourth well known to all cultural traditions:

• Truth—the basis of communication, order, and progress

The huge extent of adverse effects through the misuse of these four is overtaking civilization and threatening universal destruction. One way forward into the future is to outlaw their manipulation. Many including GLOBE are rightly calling for this. It is urgent, time is running out.

Dangerous biotechnology experimentation is rapidly expanding, and its effects can’t be recalled. Nuclear technology, including weaponry, is proliferating. EMF radiation is intensifying and the authorities are not even bothering to research its effects.

We have discussed these first three in the pages of our frequent reports, but remember it was the manipulation of truth that opened the door to their misuse.

Whilst AI is hitting the headlines because of its ability to produce fake documents at the drop of a hat, the principles of AI have been deployed with slightly less sophistication for decades by governments and commercial enterprises to sell their products and policies. Especially damaging has been the constant assertion of public safety in the absence of any confirming data—a denial of truth and precautionary science.

Just step into any topical controversy and you encounter the politicization of science and the distortion of truth. For example very young people are being told they can transition their gender. In reality, gender is determined by genetics. Surgical and chemical methods to alter physiological characteristics of gender inevitably set up a conflict between the underlying genetics and the altered physiology and biochemistry. This is now known to cause severe physical and mental health problems, yet governments are promoting procedures for children who don’t yet have the developed mental capacity to consider the implications. We now know these include serious problems and adverse effects, including sterility and loss of sexual function. Yet proponents are denying the fundamental impossibility of altering gender and hiding the appalling consequences of trying to do so.

The motivations behind this are hard to fathom completely, but they certainly include the monetary incentives enjoyed by surgeons and gender specialists who provide their dangerous experimental services to the young. Controlling the distortion of truth in any field requires more rigid policing of conflicts of interest among government advisors. It must also include the removal of financial incentives to lie or hide the truth.

The Source of Truth is Our Own Consciousness

The denial of obvious truth disconnects the perpetrator from their own source and causes psychological damage to both the speaker and the listener, the deceiver and their victim. This is a principle recognised throughout the ages, a principle that in today’s world urgently needs restoration and revival. The dire situation we are facing everywhere in the world cannot be righted without restoring truth.

Fortunately, it is everywhere known that truth is powerful. The Mundaka Upanishad affirms ‘truth alone triumphs’, the Bible promises that ‘the truth will set you free’, and Shakespeare echoes ‘truth will out’.

In my book Your DNA Diet available from the Hatchard Report I discuss the contribution of Ayurveda to health, truth and knowledge. Meditation is a technology of consciousness promoted by Ayurveda which, unlike genetic, electromagnetic, or nuclear technologies, does not upset the natural order, it restores it. Meditation has an ancient pedigree, it has served as an important element of many civilisations. If quiet reflective methods of establishing our connection with silent consciousness, the basis of truth, are forgotten, civilization can fail. If this happens, the only way forward is the revival of knowledge. At this point in time we urgently stand in need of revival.