Home Blog Page 23

If Government Became a Criminal Enterprise, How Could We Respond?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
If Government Became a Criminal Enterprise, How Could We Respond?

On 12th October 2020 or thereabouts our government signed an agreement with Pfizer for the supply of Covid 19 mRNA vaccines. The provisions of this agreement have never been revealed to the New Zealand public. Almost certainly the agreement granted Pfizer immunity from liability and prosecution should any safety issues arise.

If information from other countries is to be believed, it also restricted the right of New Zealand health authorities to independently investigate or analyse the composition or contents of the vaccines.

The signing of this contract was the opening act of a process which has led to the gradual renunciation of New Zealand sovereignty, placing the health of the nation in the hands of foreign concerns disinterested in New Zealand’s welfare.

It was also the first pandemic expenditure of many that would eventually add up to $100 billion, the biggest single issue expenditure in our government’s history outside of wartime. An expenditure that has broken the bank and mortgaged our future.

We were all set to fly blind in the hands of a multinational company well known for cutting corners when it came to safety and reliability and we were committed to paying a hefty price for the privilege.

Following this first step, there were going to be many other milestones along the way which, as you know, have changed the character of our island nation from independent self-reliance and proud championship of social justice to a pathetic denial of obvious truth, disregard for the health and rights of the individual, and dictatorial manipulation of information.

This week many of you will have watched the documentary SILENCED, a measured response on the part of a significant group of professionals, a media personality, and New Zealand doctors who chose to follow medical ethics and ask questions. As a result, they were deregistered by the New Zealand Medical Council. It is essential viewing and notable for a careful and considered examination of many of the main issues. The documentary highlights just how much our political and constitutional landscape has been altered by the pandemic.

At the conclusion of the documentary, the terms of reference of the Royal Commission of Enquiry into the pandemic response were discussed. Unbelievably, these exclude consideration of vaccine efficacy and safety including adverse effects, epidemiology of the virus, court rulings, and the specific clinical decisions taken during the pandemic regarding vaccine mandates, lockdowns, and masking rules.

The Royal Commission will be recommending how the government should respond to the next pandemic (yes, apparently it is a given that there will be another pandemic) but incredibly it is going to do so without considering what went wrong during the current one. By implication, this is going to radically affect us moving forward in diverse ways that we need to begin to analyse now in order to preserve our future health and safety.

POLITICS

Above all, pandemic policies have altered standards of political honesty and accountability. From Ardern’s podium of truth came the idea that ‘truth’ is what I tell you it is and I am not required to offer supporting evidence or answer questions. In essence, truth has become whatever a political party decides it is and any counter opinion may be dismissed as disinformation.

It has become acceptable to fund the media to support government policy and exclude dissent at the behest of government.

It has become acceptable for politicians to dismiss the concerns of constituents and fail to communicate with them if their concerns run counter to government policy—a dictatorial strategy. Blocking emails by content or name has become routine.

It seems politicians and civil servants have been able to avoid responding to OIA requests as a matter of routine. Politicians are not required to respond to OIA requests about past actions if they have moved on from a particular ministerial role.

In other words, politicians are no longer serving people, they are overruling them.

COURTS

Courts routinely chose to ignore the provisions of the New Zealand Bill of Rights when hearing cases concerning pandemic matters. In other words, they felt free to overrule basic freedoms of speech, medical choice, and peaceful protest.

Moreover, Judges have acquiesced to the power of the State without sufficient process. In not one pandemic court case during the last three years, have procedures allowed defense lawyers to cross examine the expert scientific witnesses called by the state. An apparent denial of basic justice.

In effect, government actions were placed beyond the scrutiny of law. State sponsored actions were placed beyond the reach of legal redress.

HEALTH

The State has forged a partnership with medical authorities and pharmaceutical companies that bypasses basic tenets of safety and informed consent.

Irrevocable decisions to go forward in partnership with pharmaceutical companies are being taken by governments around the world almost every day including ours. The Washington Post announced 10th April 2023 that the US government has granted $5 billion dollars to ‘Project Next Gen’ designed to make and market new biotech vaccines. The UK government has partnered with Moderna to research new vaccines and guaranteed Moderna that it will purchase and use them. The NZ government is funding efforts to research, manufacture and market mRNA vaccines here.

Partnerships between governments and pharmaceutical companies are extremely concerning and leave us wide open to abuse and corruption.

Medical authorities have ignored research confirming the huge potential of natural and complementary approaches to improve Covid outcomes. In fact, they have sought to suppress information about their use, instead relying exclusively on novel biotechnology interventions known to be risky and permanently mutagenic, yet immensely profitable.

EMPLOYMENT

The provisions of employment law, designed to protect job security, prevent discrimination, and offer compensation to those affected, were bypassed by universal vaccine mandates. Professional reputations and careers were destroyed.

This has fundamentally changed the relationship between employers and their employees. Employers can now take a controlling interest in the health status and choices of their employees—a paternalistic interest that redefines employment as a form of indentured labour.

EDUCATION

One of the most disturbing aspects of pandemic policy has been its impact on children and students.

Children and students have been coerced to vaccinate by their respective educational institutions and through government advertising. They were misinformed about the known risks and simply left with the false ‘safe and effective’ mantra, along with the knowledge that the collective enjoyment of sports and cultural activities would be off limits if they didn’t snap to.

Children were encouraged and allowed to make their own decisions about vaccination outside of the protective canopy of parental advice.

Students faced exclusion from tertiary education if they did not comply with vaccine mandates.

The integrity of family life is at the heart of social stability and progress. Government policy has weakened family integrity. This is evident in the dramatic fall in school attendance and the rise in violent teenage crime.

There will be long term effects on the next generation—the future leaders of society. It is notable that the control of education has always been a tool of repressive regimes. Hitler would not have been able to command the absolute obedience that he did without the Hitler Youth.

Home schooling, correspondence school enrollment, and online distance education have all boomed during the pandemic years for a variety of reasons. There is a growing realisation that Ministry of Education curricula can be very restrictive and in some cases promote a social framework contrary to values held by most families. For example, regulations requiring a specific approach to gender identity issues are expected to be introduced in September.

Of even greater concern are issues around the assessment of truth and validity of information. Navigating the impact of AI programmes like ChatGPT in classroom and homework settings is likely to be beyond the capabilities of most teachers. Aside from their reliance on and promotion of plagiarism, the weakness of such AI systems is their incapacity to sort truth from falsehood—they tend to opt for the most common opinion, something that curiously echoes the government’s approach to pandemic information.

In a highly prescriptive educational environment, most students will comply despite whatever their home environment has taught them. Otherwise, they are in danger of being bullied or socially isolated. I would suggest that those parents who decide to take responsibility for their children’s education at home should realise that opportunities to socially mix with peers from concerned families is essential.

An organisation similar to outward bound which offers three week outdoor adventure and leadership courses for teenagers, could be set up by parents, where, in addition to opportunities for adventure and social development, issues of truth and health can be considered in depth and explored.

Why stop there?

If we are faced, as we appear to be, with a long term fundamental shift in government integrity and control of information, why not consider creating tertiary institutes of health and interdisciplinary studies to fulfill the educational needs of tomorrow today and guarantee historical hard won rights of freedom of thinking, expression and choice? Life is not a one size fits all endeavour.

Why not remove parliamentary privilege—the right of politicians to say anything irrespective of its truth avoiding the normal remedies of law.

Why not outlaw the capacity of party leaders to suppress independent thought among their MPs—known as the whip—which promotes one dimensional policies?

Why not grant the New Zealand Bill of Rights an inviolable constitutional status? Its mild provisions and protections echo ordinary, accepted and historical notions of what is fair and just between people and between persons and the state?

Why not make all parliamentary and government business open to OIA (freedom of information) release?

Why not make government expert witnesses always subject to cross examination in the courts?

Why not prevent the government from funding or influencing the media?

Why not ask for biotechnology experimentation to be outlawed as we have done at GLOBE

Now is certainly the time to stand up for all these, but you are probably going to say most of these are unlikely to happen, and on present evidence you could be right. If you believe that, you must accept that we have to independently plan for a brighter future. Otherwise isolated from one another in a largely uncritical social milieu we could be overtaken and overwhelmed by events beyond our control and excluded from any future. Reality Check Radio is evidence that new trusted institutions can be established. We need this.

We Are Being Prepped to Suffer Another Catastrophe

Guy Hatchard
-
0
We Are Being Prepped to Suffer Another Catastrophe

Two lead articles in the UK Guardian yesterday give an indication of what we collectively face over the next five to ten years. One was entitled ‘A silver lining’: how Covid ushered in a vaccines golden era and the other Cancer and heart disease vaccines ‘ready by the end of the decade’.

Both articles were written by Linda Geddes, science correspondent of the Guardian. Dig a little and you discover that Geddes is also a consultant to GAVI, the Global Vaccine Alliance whose largest donor is the Gates Foundation. Two lead articles on the same day in a supposedly independent newspaper says a lot about the enormous reach of GAVI, Gates, and Big Pharma.

The articles promise to save millions of lives by 2030 through multiple mRNA jabs being developed by Moderna for conditions including cancer, cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, autoimmune disease, and rare diseases—just about a full house. Forgive me for being a party pooper, but aren’t these the same conditions now known to be caused or complicated by mRNA Covid vaccines that we discuss in our reports every week?

No worries though, Geddes interviews a number of vaccine scientists and reports “Development and testing has advanced at an unprecedented pace since the arrival of Covid-19, enabling technologies that might otherwise have taken another decade to undergo late-stage clinical testing, regulatory approval and manufacturing scale-up to prove their mettle [by simply administering them unproven] to millions of people.”

“Since then, the number of trials exploring mRNA vaccines for other diseases has exploded.” Some of these have now been granted ‘breakthrough therapy designation’ by the US FDA, meaning that their regulatory approval will be fast tracked (and then administered to millions of unsuspecting human guinea pigs).

I can’t believe what I am reading here. It is now considered:

  • A triumph that the Pfizer mRNA vaccinated trial group had a higher mortality than the control group, (results that were hidden and like other facts are still being obfuscated)
  • A so-called advance for science that the vaccine safety trials were then cut short and the control groups injected when they were supposed to remain unvaccinated over the longer term to determine safety.

In the Guardian articles are a few simple diagrams which, for the benefit of lay persons, reduce the operation of tens of thousands of genes and millions of proteins in each of our 37 trillion cells to a simple magic jab and hey presto. They appear to be very similar to the diagrams that fooled us about the non-existent safety and effectiveness of mRNA Covid vaccines.

Have they forgotten what eminent award-winning research biologist Professor Brian J. Ford wrote in 2017 about the paucity of our knowledge of living systems and the danger of assuming we know more than we do, saying:

“The unfathomable complexity of a living cell is not generally appreciated; even a simulation of the way a mitochondrion moves would be beyond our current conventions. Emulating fragments of our trivial understanding does not explain their intricacy, for cells are intelligent, and they live lives that we have hardly begun to address.”

The Guardian articles mention two current trials of novel Moderna vaccines whose approval has just been fast tracked by the FDA:

  • An experimental mRNA vaccine showed 83.7% effectiveness (??) against just two (??) symptoms of RSV (cough and fever)—RSV is generally a mild cold-like illness which can affect infants and older adults more seriously.
  • A Melanoma skin cancer genetic vaccine trial with just 157 participants was reported to show 44% less death and recurrence of cancer when compared to treatment with the drug keytruda alone.

The newspaper article does not provide needed information to assess what the 83.7% and 44% could mean. In actuality, the five year survival rates for all forms of melanoma combined using current treatments is very high at 94% and keytruda is not a stand alone melanoma treatment, only an optional treatment for some advanced forms of melanoma. Against this background, the 44% figure is virtually meaningless and clearly a statistical sleight of hand intended to deceive the lay reader about overall efficacy.

The Guardian articles raise more serious questions than answers, unbelievably for example there is no mention of adverse effects except to say that some (???) people have felt a bit rough after Covid 19 vaccination, which according to Prof. Robin Shattock, who leads the Future Vaccine Manufacturing Research Hub at Imperial College London, might mistakenly lead some people to vaccine hesitancy. Why hasn’t Professor Shattock been able to appreciate that the number of reports of vaccine harm from Covid-19 vaccines exceeds those from all other previous flu vaccines combined by a massive factor?

Dr. Paul Burton, Chief Medical Officer at Moderna believes that among other miracles Moderna will shortly develop a one stop shot for all respiratory illness. Neither of the two cited Moderna trial results are as game changing as he and the articles try to suggest to uncritical readers. Neither justify in any way whatsoever the suggestion most illnesses will be cured in 5 to 10 years. Nor does Dr. Bruton want to tell us about the known fact that viral vaccines can promote other respiratory conditions, known as viral interference, something that can also result from combining vaccine types.

So what is Moderna actually hoping for? Apparently another 100 billion dollar payday. Geddes interviews a number of leading vaccine scientists who profusely thank governments for their political power and funding which they say has helped the process of rolling this out to hundreds of millions of people [before safety research has been done]. The UK, US, and Norway are the top governmental donors to GAVI.

The scientists’ principle worry appears to be that their research funds will be diverted to pay for the war in the Ukraine and so they sound a note of warning “that the accelerated progress, which has surged ‘by an order of magnitude’ in the past three years, will be wasted if a high level of investment is not maintained.”

We are not fooled by this sort of childishly transparent PR hyperbole and propaganda are we? Extremely well connected and highly funded people are planning the ‘sharp end’ of our medical future as compliant lab rats and they fully expect that governments will not be giving us any opt-out choices while compliant legislators and courts will be granting them immunity. In other words, business as usual, but with new more deadly toys.

To help these scientists out, mainstream publications like Scientific American and many others are publishing articles about strategies to close down debate before it even begins. The two articles in the Guardian are prime examples of a pre-emptive strike against what are wrongly termed conspiracy theories and in actuality are sensible questions. Since when did science exclude rational debate and open information? It is happening here in New Zealand, watch this revealing piece on Dr. Sanjaya Hattotuwa, leader of the The Disinformation Project.

As it stands, ordinary people are facing the combined efforts of an international cartel of commercial interests—media giants, big pharma, agrichemical industries, food processors, governments, academia, medical and military authorities—all 100% united behind our biotechnology future, come what may. They are rushing to introduce a raft of new drugs and vaccines that are far more invasive, experimental, and dangerous than anything we have ever been exposed to before. More worryingly, because they contain active synthetic genetic instructions, once implemented their unpredictable effects can’t be recalled. They will remain with us for generations.

We Are at the Start of a Slow Moving Catastrophe Beginning to Engulf Mankind

Just how frightening this prospect may be, was underlined last week with the publication of a paper entitled “SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Accumulation in the Skull-Meninges- Brain Axis: Potential Implications for Long-Term Neurological Complications in post-COVID-19“. There are two sources of the Covid spike protein—Covid infection and vaccination. The second being the more persistent and quantitatively larger source. The study’s results, based on autopsies and animal experiments, suggest that the spike protein could have a long lifetime in the body whereby it could continue to cause cell death in the brain and consequent long term neurological damage.

It is not hard to imagine that this is already happening, when we look around us and digest the rising levels of serious crime, the overflowing hospitals, the excess deaths, economic chaos, gender rage, family violence and youth suicide.

Those promoting biotech medicine are highly organised. Rubber stamp policies are fed directly into government databases and appear ready-made on the computers of lawmakers and media in countries around the world, all funded and controlled by big pharma. Our children are being trained for a compliant future as they line up to receive their shots mandated by their educational institutions and paid for by our own tax dollars.

This level of organised and coordinated manipulation cannot be effectively countered by individuals hiding or even by those speaking up in isolation. Voices like those of eminent UK Professor of Oncology Angus Dalgleish or cardiologist Professors Aseem Malhotra and Peter McCollough are being ignored and cancelled almost with impunity.

Thinking that normality will return automatically is a pipedream. In 1944 Helene Berr refused to heed friends in Paris who urged her to go underground or flee the city. She decided to continue as usual in the hope that sanity would reassert itself as the allied invasion of Normandy closed in on Paris. Confronted by reports of Nazi raids and arrests she wrote in her diary “What a shame that one half of humanity is manufacturing evil and a tiny minority is trying to put it right”. Helene was arrested and died in Belsen on 14th April 1945 following a severe beating by a guard just two weeks before Hitler committed suicide.

Reasserting normality, rational thought, freedom of information and public debate, medical choice and informed consent, is not something that can be left to others. The whole world, left and right, white and black, man and woman, east and west are slowly being engulfed by a tidal wave of harm.

There is at this point a pressing need to set up independent institutions of health and learning that offer educational programmes unbiased by commercial interests. Otherwise the future leaders of society, the next generation will grow up misinformed and misled, their heads stuffed with the wild imaginings of mad scientists who want to play God with us all.

Ex Pm Jacinda Ardern Appointed to an International Role to Promote Government and Media Censorship

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Ex Pm Jacinda Ardern Appointed to an International Role to Promote Government and Media Censorship

The Australian bucked the Covid publishing trend three days ago with an article “Media to blame for Covid vaccines’ wall of infallibility”. The Australian has a paywall, but you can read the article reprinted in full here.

Was I wrong to suggest in yesterday’s GLOBE article Cells, Consciousness, Biotechnology, and Intelligence that I don’t see any indication that the authorities will change their ‘safe and effective’ Covid vaccine narrative? Probably not.

It remains to be seen if the article in The Australian, and similar questions that have been raised by Sky News Australia for some time, will eventually have any effect on the Covid vaccine policies of Australian states and the federal government, but here in New Zealand, we remain under a cloak of media silence funded by our government which precludes honest reporting around Covid vaccines.

We woke up this morning to find that, as well as being appointed to the board of Prince William’s Earthshot Prize, our former Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has been appointed by current PM Chris Hipkins as a special international envoy for the Christchurch Call, an organisation she initiated in the wake of the despicable and vile Christchurch Mosque shooting with high hopes for a brighter future.

The Christchurch Call is ostensibly aimed at preventing terrorist acts, but inexplicably Ardern now envisages a much wider role for the organisation including “calling on signatory nations to adopt and enforce laws that ban objectionable material”. When explaining what is particularly objectionable, Ardern can’t seem to refrain from citing Covid vaccine hesitancy.

New PM Chris Hipkins added his support: 

“Jacinda Ardern’s commitment to stopping violent extremist content like we saw that day is key to why she should carry on this work. Her relationships with leaders and technology companies and her drive for change will help increase the pace and ambition of the work we are doing.”

An article in the Guardian this morning agrees that Ardern includes ‘questions about vaccination’ under the heading ‘extremist and far right content’ that needs to be controlled by governments.

The kind of real questions that need answers from governments are illustrated by this paper from Japan published March 20 2023. The paper reports an autopsy on a 14 year old girl who died immediately after her third booster which found:

“congestive edema of the lungs, T-cell lymphocytic and macrophage infiltration in the lungs, pericardium, and myocardium of the left atria and left ventricle, liver, kidneys, stomach, duodenum, bladder, and diaphragm.”

The authors conclude that:

“In sudden post-vaccination deaths, aggressive autopsy systemic search and histological examination involving extensive sectioning of the heart, including the atrium, are indispensable.”

Hundreds of Citizens Suffering Cardiac Events After Bivalent Boosters

In another report, a New England Journal of Medicine article examines French data showing hundreds of citizens suffering cardiac events after bivalent boosters (summarised here).

But we are not getting autopsies are we and concerning data is not being publicised. Instead, we have mainstream media and the Ministry of Health denying any relationship between sudden death and Covid vaccination, and then we get Ardern touring the world to laud Covid vaccines and encourage media censorship of science.

From the almost universal lack of mainstream media content anywhere in the world questioning Covid vaccine safety, one gets the impression that Ardern will be welcomed everywhere with open arms.

Ardern masterminded the censorship of web and social media content in New Zealand. Behind her innocuous-sounding anti-terrorism rhetoric lies a very determined and controlling attitude to press freedom. Under Ardern, our so-called free press was funded to reproduce glowing reports of government Covid policy.

Academia also received generous government funding directly from the Prime Minister’s office to attack counter narratives which were labelled as conspiracy theories (they seem to still receive this type of witch hunt funding). Scientific theories publicly rejected as conspiracies during the 2021 vaccine rollout included:

  • Herd immunity
  • Dying with Covid rather than because of it
  • Asymptomatic Covid infection
  • Over estimation of Covid fatality rates
  • Adverse effects of Covid vaccination
  • Integration of vaccine gene sequences into the recipient’s DNA
  • High rate of vulnerability among the elderly
  • Lab origin of Covid

It appears that the government is now in grave danger of running out of conspiracy theories, since all of the above have since been supported by research (and were in fact at the time). Yet this has not changed their course and the public have never been offered an explanation or apology.

How can anybody with any sense of decency conflate scientific papers with hate speech or terrorist acts? Such opinions are completely at odds with rational thought. They amount to forcing risky medical procedures on whole populations not just without informed consent but while actually hiding the true extent of adverse effects.

What are the goals here? The media and social media are already very heavily controlled and people silenced, so what more do they want and why?

The government control of the media narrative has meant that most of the tens of thousands of people severely adversely affected by Covid vaccines have been unable to receive compensation from ACC (the New Zealand universal accident insurance scheme) or in many cases sufficient medical help.

Worse than this, most people seriously affected by medical conditions known to be related to Covid vaccination such as kidney injury and cardiac conditions (or those now suspected to be so including liver injury, neurological conditions, cancer and stroke), have no idea of new research strengthening the probable causal connection to Covid vaccination and are now being encouraged by governments to receive more vaccinations.

The fact that our government has appointed Jacinda Ardern to a role aimed at further controlling the global media and governmental policy, speaks volumes of their real intentions and mindset. PM Chris Hipkins was formerly Minister for Covid Response, and he apparently has no desire to change that trajectory any time soon to take account of up to date Covid data and science publishing.

In fact, as we noted above, Hipkins is aiming to “increase the pace and ambition of the work we are doing”. Apparently, New Zealand political figures have global ambitions. You can’t help invoking the Charge of the Light Brigade—a dash to certain death.

But it is in fact more dangerous. The government’s Covid vaccine response is being framed by the NZ media and by key architects of the policy, such as Professor Michael Baker and Sir Ashley Bloomfield, as heroic, world-beating, and supremely successful. They are doing so despite our current record breaking rates of excess all cause mortality. In other words, they are asking us to believe that unprecedented widespread and pointless Covid vaccine death and injury can be labelled a triumph. Soon Ardern might be selling the same fake stories to wannabe government and IT censors around the world.

If you consider scientific studies to be misinformation what else will be silenced? It is not very hard to recognise the workings of propaganda and the rewriting of history in this doublespeak. Our leaders want to make sure that we never even have the opportunity to question the consequences of their misinformed Covid policy or indeed any policy.

The Truth Will Out

You don’t have to delve very far into history to find parallels. In October 1943, Germany was losing the war on all fronts and it became apparent that their role in mass exterminations would inevitably be exposed. Himmler doubled down and told his guilty troops:

“Most of you will know what it is like to see 100 corpses lying side by side or 500, or 1000 of them. To have coped with this and – except for cases of human weakness – to have remained decent, that has made us tough…it is a glorious page in our history.”

There can hardly be anything more chilling in the annals of twisted morality.

As Shakespeare said “the truth will out”, but here in isolated New Zealand we still don’t know if it will do so in time to rescue our health, happiness, and our trampled Bill of Rights.

The thought that Jacinda Ardern, who can be a persuasive speaker (see here), will be wandering around the world funded to promote her extreme views on government and media control under the imprimatur of Prince William, the Christchurch Call, and the New Zealand government should send shivers down the spines of freedom loving people everywhere.

The Last Ditch Deceptions Aimed at Saving the Doomed and Deadly Covid Vaccines

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Last Ditch Deceptions Aimed at Saving the Doomed and Deadly Covid Vaccines

An article by Penny Murray, Stuff newspaper’s news director, appeared yesterday with the headline “Bivalent booster likely spared me the worst when Covid burned through our house”. Stuff has received financial support from the government to operate a programme called “The Whole Truth” which promotes Covid vaccination. Since the government has just started rolling out the bivalent vaccine, it is no surprise that Stuff is blowing their trumpet.

Penny reports that her two kids under 12 have had two mRNA shots, her husband three, and she herself has had four including the bivalent booster a few days ago. The kids and her husband have fallen ill with Covid and feel very unwell. They have a variety of symptoms including vomiting, headaches, and fever. Penny has a Covid infection too but her only symptoms are in her words: “a grinding headache and feel awful. Everything hurts”. Miraculously she has skipped the fever. In the article, Murray concludes that the bivalent booster is the key to avoiding serious Covid symptoms.

The Immunity Advisory Centre funded by the government reassures Penny she is right. It told her “because your immune system was already activated to respond to the virus [by the bivalent booster], it lessened your symptoms.”

The Lack of Logic is Frightening

I don’t know what you think of articles like this, the lack of logic is frightening. Yesterday on 27 March 2023 a preprint study was published entitled “IgG4 Antibodies Induced by mRNA Vaccines Generate Immune Tolerance to SARS-CoV-2’spike Protein by Suppressing the Immune System”. The authors offer a conclusion which diverges completely from the official government narrative and Penny’s naive scribblings:

“Altogether, evidence suggests that the reported increase in the IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines is not a protective mechanism; rather, it may be a part of the immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. IgG4-induced suppression of the immune system due to repeated vaccination can also cause autoimmune diseases, promotes cancer growth, and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.”

It appears from this study that Penny’s whole family likely had a bout with Covid infection because of vaccination, but of course Stuff is not paid by the government to tell us that. I recommend that everyone at Stuff keep up to date with published science, rather than giving us their seat of the pants, government-funded, home-grown myths of the wonders of Covid vaccination. They might also take a look at a recent Lancet paper concluding that natural immunity works very well, as responsibly reported here by the Wall Street Journal.

They should also look at the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) in which Dr. Paul Offit a member of the US FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee writes under the title Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale and reports the result of two studies of the bivalent vaccines which found:

“no significant difference in neutralization of any SARS-CoV-2 variant,” including BA.4 and BA.5, between the two groups. One day later, Dan Barouch and colleagues released the results of a similar study, finding that “BA.5 [neutralizing-antibody] titers were comparable following monovalent and bivalent mRNA boosters.” Barouch and colleagues also noted no appreciable differences in CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell responses between participants in the monovalent-booster group and those in the bivalent-booster group. Neither research group found the bivalent boosters to elicit superior immune responses. The results are now published in the NEJM.

The bivalent vaccine is designed to protect against BA.4 and BA.5 strains of Covid, but Offit also reported:

“By December 2022, the BA.4 strain was no longer circulating, and BA.5 accounted for less than 25% of circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains, having been partially replaced by more immune-evasive strains, such as BQ.1, BQ.1.1, BF.7, XBB, and XBB.1.”

In layman’s terms, studies show the bivalent vaccines are about equivalent to earlier mRNA vaccines, which as we know wear off rapidly and expose recipients to adverse effects. This is contrary to the advice the New Zealand Immunity Advisory Centre who told Penny Murray that:

“In all likelihood, your [bivalent] booster dose will have given you additional protection.”

Certain Covid Vaccines Might TREBLE Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Women Under 30

I am guessing that Stuff is going to come roaring back with carefully edited extracts of an article from the Australian edition of the Daily Mail. You will know why Stuff can’t reprint it verbatim when you read the headline “Certain Covid vaccines might TREBLE risk of sudden cardiac death in women under 30, official data shows“. The article reports a study which found that the AstraZeneca Covid vaccine is a culprit when it comes to women’s health among the under 30s, increasing the risk of death by 3.5 times within 12 weeks, but the Mail goes on to report that the study also found mRNA vaccines don’t carry a risk of death (actually it did among young men).

It is always useful to take a good look at any actual studies which form the basis of newspaper articles about Covid.

The Mail then takes a giant leap of vaccine faith and asserts that this “disproves a conspiracy theory beloved by anti-vaxxers that the mRNA shots are responsible for a wave of ‘sudden’ deaths.” It is always useful to take a good look at any actual studies which form the basis of newspaper articles about Covid. This one was published by Nature on 27 March 2023 entitled “Risk of death following COVID-19 vaccination or positive SARS-CoV-2 test in young people in England”. The principal authors were scientists who work for the UK government, who are also coincidentally rolling out the bivalent booster.

The study measured the incidence of death in hospital up to 12 weeks after a vaccine dose in the age group 12 to 29 and compared that to the incidence of death after the 12 week period. In other words, it assumed that the risk of injury from the vaccine would only last 12 weeks. The authors state: “any long lasting increase in risk [of death] postvaccination would not have been detectable with this approach.” 

They also note that sudden deaths of young persons outside of hospital were unlikely to have been captured by the study due to coronial delays. In other words, the ‘sudden deaths’ whose occurrence the Mail reporter wrongly believed the study refuted were not actually covered by the study. The authors also note that a similar study in Florida found differing results to theirs—an increased risk of death in the four weeks following mRNA vaccination for young males aged 12-39.

Globally Hospitalisations and Excess All Cause Mortality Are at Record Levels

Hospitalisations and excess all cause mortality in the UK, Australia, New Zealand, the whole of the EU, and USA are at record levels and the data is pointing squarely at the long term effects of mRNA vaccines. In New Zealand, hospitalisations doubled in 12 key disease categories, during the mRNA vaccine rollout (pre-Covid), but government funded vaccine proponents are busy trying to convince us to take more. Dr. Paul Offit, in the NEJM describes bivalent vaccines as a ‘failure’ and asks why on earth did the US agree to buy 105 million doses in a great hurry before the scientific verdict was in. We have to say the same thing about New Zealand (who have bought 1.7 million doses), Australia, and the UK. Either they acted before the data was published or they chose to ignore it.

It is not just hospitalisations that are up. Work absences due to illness are through the roof and accelerating fast. Former Blackrock financial analyst Edward Dowd has found that absenteeism in the USA was up by 5 standard deviations in 2021 and 7 standard deviations in 2022. His data is worth a whole article on its own. For our purposes, here it indicates a range of effects from Covid vaccination among working age people, from tiredness to persistent illness to hospitalisation and an increasing number of deaths.

Importantly, the situation is not something we can just sit out and hope it goes away. People in charge of making policy are not coming to their senses, they are moving in the other direction. They are doing so using a mixture of misleading propaganda, media control, and draconian legislation. This trend is continuing to gather pace. For example, minors are being encouraged to ignore their parent’s advice when it comes to medical decisions about vaccination and other risky drugs like puberty blockers.

There is No Rhyme or Reason to Current Medical Policy Formation

It is time for people to stand up for commonsense and educate themselves about scientific facts. In the absence of sensible leadership, individual MPs need to do the same. Otherwise, we are slowly drifting towards a pharmaceutical state with policies that ultimately disrupt families (the basis of a stable society), prioritise corporate profits over health, and strip individuals of any medical choice.

It is worth repeating the conclusion of the latest published assessment of mRNA vaccines:

“Induced suppression of the immune system due to repeated mRNA vaccination can cause autoimmune diseases, promote cancer growth, and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.”

Stuff newspaper, writing on behalf of the government is urging you to roll the dice one more time with the bivalent booster. You decide if you are feeling lucky.

Sir Ashley Bloomfield is Incorrect

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Sir Ashley Bloomfield is Incorrect

New Zealand has suffered the worst health disaster in our history and it is not over.

Is this due to miscalculation, subterfuge, or lies?

Sir Ashley Bloomfield was the Director General of Health and the public face of the government’s Covid policy. He retired last year and is now establishing a Public Policy Impact Institute (PPII) at Auckland University. PPII aims to shape the government’s future public health policy.

In an article in RNZ on 25th March 2023, Bloomfield claims we are out the other side of the pandemic saying: “Everyone’s sort of life’s getting almost back to completely normal” [???]. 

Sir Ashley said he was “greatly satisfied that three years on from the first lockdown, Aotearoa still had negative excess mortality”. Bloomfield reported that WHO acknowledges New Zealand’s pandemic response was “one of the best in the world” and added that “lockdowns may have a place” in New Zealand’s future.

Bloomfield’s statement was carefully worded to hide the misrepresentation in his assessment of pandemic policy. In 2020 there was a large reduction in excess mortality due to the lockdowns, border closures, and the consequent absence of both Covid and seasonal flu. We now know these lockdowns came at a great social and economic cost. It affected our school children’s development. It destroyed our tourist industry. Family violence increased.

In 2021, whilst lockdowns, border closures and the absence of Covid and flu continued, deaths rose in synchrony with the vaccine roll out. More alarmingly, hospital admissions in 2021, for a range of conditions known to be adverse effects of Covid vaccination, doubled (see here). This set the stage for future rises in excess deaths. In 2022 the rate of excess deaths rose to record levels (see here). In 2023 this trend has accelerated further (see here).

Sir Ashley Bloomfield is not just reassuring us that he did a good job but claiming the best in the world. New Zealand has just finished a year with the highest excess mortality on record. It doesn’t add up, does it? My question is this: Why did Bloomfield fail to acknowledge the human cost and how is he getting away with it?

It helps to have the media failing to ask critical questions and staunchly on your side, but that only leads to another question: Why do they do it? Certainly, the media are being paid to promote the vaccine, but surely they wouldn’t continue to print obvious lies if newly published research pointed squarely to errors?

The Miscalculations of the Age of Technology

In the early 1980s, I bought a hand held programmable calculator, marvelled at its ability, wrote a BASIC routine to test multiplication tables, and began to use it as a classroom aid. Little did I realise at the time that within the space of a few years mathematical literacy would plummet. Students were being taught a push button notion of maths that crippled their capacity to evaluate figures in their heads. This is Ashley Bloomfield’s ‘get out of jail free’ card.

The limited pandemic figures that have been released in New Zealand and around the world are unequivocal—mRNA vaccines are deadly, but mathematical assessment is not a strong suit of the general public. As long as the media keep printing stories about our pandemic success, no one is any the wiser.

People are falling sick and dying in record numbers, but the government, Te Whatu Ora, the media, and Sir Ashley Bloomfield are reassuring everybody it would have been a lot worse if they hadn’t taken the vaccine. In fact, the reverse is true and is even being admitted by prestigious science journals like the Lancet. The unvaccinated have higher natural immunity. In fact, this has been known to science for nine months (see here).

Just stop for a moment and think, if Sir Ashley Bloomfield and others involved in the formation and promotion of Covid policy were to publicly admit this, they would face public censure and possibly even criminal charges. So apparently the culprits are determined that this is not going to happen.

I am not impugning the initial motivations or intentions in New Zealand. Doctors enter into medicine with the hope that they can help people. The billionaires who control the censorship of social media, started their fledgling IT projects with good intentions. Journalists are trained to uncover the truth. Politicians aspire to help their nation. Yet they all fell for a lie (read this comprehensive assessment by Ramesh Thakur former Assistant Secretary General of the United Nations). Covid vaccination was touted as an obvious social good.

No one on the receiving end realised that biotech medicine was known to be risky and inherently mutagenic, but someone on the other end knew.

The vast corporate world of big pharma knew. For years they have been honing their public relations skills to promote big lies and profit. They knew that Covid vaccines were neither safe nor effective, but they hid and camouflaged the data (see here and here). By failing to speak up and sound the alarm as more data came to light, Sir Ashley Bloomfield ended up joining their ranks. He shouldn’t have, because as a doctor he would have known just how deadly the known adverse effects of Covid vaccination were.

Last week I published an article “The Gene Illusion That is Killing Us” in which I reported an OIA detailing a list of 12 illness categories whose collective incidence doubled in New Zealand in 2021, post vaccination, but pre Covid. What I didn’t explain in that article, are the known short and long term mortality rates associated with these conditions.

There were 31,335 extra hospitalisations in New Zealand for Acute Kidney Injury in 2021 compared to 2019. A 2019 study found “recent data suggest that the risk of mortality and renal dysfunction extends far beyond hospital discharge.”

There were 438 extra hospitalisations for Acute Liver Injury. A 2019 study found that the risk of death following medication induced liver injury is 10%.

There were 2093 extra hospitalisations for Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). A 2014 study found that the risk of death within one year was 31% and continued to be elevated after that.

I don’t need to go through all the 12 categories of illness do I or the 25 other categories that the Ministry of Health have not yet released including cancer? Suffice to say these are conditions with serious short and long term implications for health and mortality. Clearly, Covid vaccination is depressing immune function, leading to an across the board susceptibility to a huge range of illnesses. Members of the public are meekly receiving diagnoses for potentially fatal conditions, but the medical profession are mute on the possible causal involvement of Covid vaccination in many of the cases.

Any doctor should have been concerned about the doubling of hospital admissions in 2021, let alone the Director General of Health who had ultimate responsibility for public health and well being. He should have paused the Covid vaccine programme.

I find all the public posturing about vaccine safety incomprehensible and increasingly concerning. I’m sure you do too. The government is ramping up their promotion of the bivalent vaccine, while a growing number of scientists around the world are sounding the alarm. They are publishing articles in journals pointing out the errors in Covid policy decisions (see here) that are costing lives, but the government, its advisors, the media, and the medical profession are unrepentant.

As Sir Ashley Bloomfield dreams of future pandemics and lockdowns from his comfortable new chair in academia, it is hard to escape the notion that human life has become very cheap or even irrelevant in the pursuit of policy, prestige, power, and profit.

5 Important Reasons to Get Your Covid-19 Booster

Guy Hatchard
-
0
5 Important Reasons to Get Your Covid-19 Booster

Yesterday our local rag carried a full page advertisement from Te Whatu Ora “5 important reasons to get your COVID-19 booster”. It is gratifying to know that someone still has the money to look out for our interests, keeping us up-to-date and safe.

It is surprising what you can learn if you keep your eyes and ears open. Coincidentally I was standing in the bread line at the Beehive yesterday when I ended up next to the copywriter who was spooning an extra ladle of gravy onto their plate of meat and two veg. This person (you have to avoid outdated pronouns like ‘he’ or ‘she’ these days, instead use ‘ze’) seemed to want to talk so I just listened sympathetically. I thought you might want to know the gist of what ze said:

Apparently, it is an uphill battle writing Covid copy. Take Point 3 of the advert “Boosters can provide stronger immunity than the natural immunity you get after having COVID-19”. There was that difficult article in the Lancet last month analysing the results of 65 studies which according to the Wall Street Journal purported to show that the protection offered by natural immunity exceeds the protection offered by two or even three mRNA doses (that can’t be right). Luckily no one in New Zealand reads the WSJ, but even if they did, our public is getting used to following orders and learning to go with ‘the science’.

Point 2 “Boosters help protect you from getting very sick from COVID-19 ending up in hospital, and even death” was a little tricky. It is always useful to play the death card, but there is a lot of it around these days. More than ever before, apparently. Again, it is lucky that no one knows why. Let’s keep it that way I say, and the boffins down at Te Whatu Ora agree with me. When in doubt, leave it out.

Point 1 “Your immunity from COVID-19 reduces over time so keeping up-to-date with your boosters provides an extra layer of protection”. Another tricky point, we didn’t want to put this out there, but unfortunately, it seems that almost everyone knows by now that vaccination and Covid go together like pizza and chips. We have bought all these boosters from those people at Pfizer and something has to be done with them. We’re a zero waste economy. It’s like dealing with your cocaine dealer, you have to keep them onside. Pfizer has assured us these new boosters work very well, they do something for 3 or 4 weeks (no one knows quite what) but then they run out. One thing leads to another. So you have to get another one and unfortunately they do cost a lot (like everything going up in price too). It all helps to keep the economy going.

Points 4 and 5 were the easy ones. A lot of warm fuzzy stuff about spending time with friends and whanau and going on holiday. I do like those overseas trips where you can talk to other people in the same fix and share cover stories. There was that German Health Minister the other day who broke the story gently, admitting that mRNA vaccines can kill a small (???) number of people even though they are really good. It was alright for him, because he wasn’t in power when they were approved and mandated. So, unfortunately, it wouldn’t work here of course. If we were to admit that we made any mistakes, it might endanger all those genuinely helpful policies like three waters (I know about tap water and the sea, but I’m not sure what the third one is), the right to free speech (I’d do anything to protect mine but I’m not sure there is enough space for everyone), or the option to ride a bicycle to ED if you are ill or pregnant (especially if you have an old car).

According to my copywriting friend, the gravy is running out (when I got my hands on the ladle, I saw that it was), and ze is thinking of changing its job. I told him (oops) that undertaking is dead safe, there is a lot of call for it and reportedly that is unlikely to change anytime soon. It seems to me that his previous experience would give him a headstart (or is it a headcount? I can never remember which).

Could mRNA Inoculations Reduce Our Capacity for Self Actualisation?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Could mRNA Inoculations Reduce Our Capacity for Self Actualisation?

In October 2022, an article appeared in Independent Science News entitled “Did West Africa’s Ebola Outbreak of 2014 Have a Lab Origin?”. In essence, it appears that concerns about the origin of the 2014 Ebola outbreak in Guinea were suppressed by the same scientists who rushed to suppress information about Covid’s origins. A nearby research lab was in the process of experimenting on the Ebola virus. As was the case with Covid, factually inaccurate and misleading information was used to argue for a zoonotic origin, while the lab leak theory was buried.

This and much else raises questions about transparency, judgement, integrity and truth. Are they still alive and well? In fact, you may have noticed there is a surfeit of confused anxiety, poor judgement, misplaced conviction, and aggressive behaviour evident of late in society and in personal relationships. To a superficial observer, much of this appears to have been switched on following the advent of Covid vaccination programs. In reality, there must be multiple causes for pandemic era dysfunction, but suspicion remains that mRNA vaccines may have psychological effects.

These suspicions are strengthened by the work of psychologist Abraham Maslow who established a hierarchy of human potential. Maslow studied the characteristics of highly successful, happy, and self-actualised individuals. Among many other characteristics, he identified:

More Efficient Perception of Reality.

“Self-actualizing people have an unusual ability to detect the spurious, the fake, and the dishonest in personality, and in general to judge people correctly and efficiently” (all quote marks in this section denote extracts from Maslow’s book Motivation and Personality, 1970, I have drawn from an excellent summary linked here).

Acceptance of Self, Others and Nature.

“They can accept their own human nature, with all its shortcomings, with all its discrepancies from the ideal image without feeling real concern.”

Autonomy

“Self-actualized people are not dependent for their main satisfactions on the real world, or other people or culture or means to ends or, in general, on extrinsic satisfactions.”

Empathy

“Self-actualizing people have for human beings in general a deep feeling of identification, sympathy, and affection in spite of the occasional anger, impatience, or disgust… because of this, they have a genuine desire to help the human race as if they were all members of a single family.”

Discrimination Between Good and Evil

“These individuals are strongly ethical, they have definite moral standards.… Needless to say, their notions of right and wrong and good and evil are often not the conventional ones.”

Peak Experiences

“Feelings of limitless horizons opening up to the vision, the feeling of being simultaneously more powerful and also more helpless than one ever was before, the feeling of great ecstasy and wonder and awe, the loss of placing in time and space…”

Reading these, you may think the pandemic brought out the worst in people. In many countries, including New Zealand, preliminary reports indicate violent crime has increased, while political and social divides have deepened. Commentators have also noticed the rapid growth of polarised rather than inclusive behaviours and attitudes. As we know only too well, other people’s behaviour is usually beyond our control. As they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink. But would it be wrong to think that there are no remedies to correct errant behaviour and attitudes, especially if they are widespread?

Faced with the strange findings of quantum mechanics, physicists like Erwin Schrödinger and others sought inspiration in the ancient Indian philosophy of Vedanta. Vedanta, which literally means the ‘end outcome of all knowledge’ is not a religion or a belief system. It involves the study of consciousness from the subjective path of introspection and meditation. Can that throw light on our modern existential dilemmas?

As with all things, charity begins at home. How is that? According to Vedanta, our true home is our unbounded Self or consciousness. If you have been following the HatchardReport.com and GLOBE.GLOBAL, you will be well aware by now that we have been concerned to investigate the relationship between DNA and consciousness.

Essentially DNA exists in every one of our trillions of cells. This massive collection of cells succeeds in supporting a single identity—our Self. The Self is the Wholeness of consciousness supported by the parts of the physiology taken together. The Whole is more than the sum of the parts.

Do not be put off by the abstract notion of Wholeness, we are all familiar with connectedness among friends, family, loved ones, and countrymen. This bestows comfort and a feeling of belonging. Just imagine that this supportive network is extended and expanded to its ultimate degree, including our relationship with the laws of nature, eventually transcending limitations, and we can glimpse a settled sense of cosmic belonging and bliss that is the essence of Wholeness. An unbounded state of consciousness in which everything is truly well and wisely put, corresponding to Maslow’s concept of peak experience.

When we talk about the Self, we are not talking about our small self (written with a small ‘s’) dominated by egotism, but the Self in its most broad and expanded sense as denoted by a capital ’S’. This has many names in many cultures: consciousness, soul, atma, etc.

We make many decisions every day on the ground, so to speak, of our inner identity, our Self. It is the functioning intellect which decides, but it can only function at its full potential as long as it is connected to the Wholeness of our Self. We experience through the five senses, but the authenticity of how we express experience depends upon the interface between intellect and Wholeness. This is the truth interface. Wisdom, intelligent decisions, and optimised actions are only possible if we remain true to our higher Self. This is a concept shared by cultures around the world. For example, listen to a master Japanese noodle maker Suichi Kotani, explaining how his consciousness interfaces with his work (watch here from 4.56 minutes).

Referring to modern physics, we find the unified level of nature’s intelligence has certain characteristics which help us to understand the interface between intellect and consciousness. Firstly the wholly unified level of nature’s functioning, which underpins all natural law, is least excited, it is a field of deep silence, it is unchanging, unmanifest, and beyond space and time. Yet it is the source of change, it is capable of expressing itself. It does so by referring to itself, referring to its own Wholeness.

This identifies the unified level of natural law, as awake. It has that characteristic of intellect and consciousness together, it can be both specific and universal. It creates with reference to its own silent, non-active Wholeness, whilst leaving that Wholeness intact and unchanged.

No doubt this all sounds highly philosophical, but it may be an essential step to understand how genetic editing could damage our intelligence. Crucially physiology and consciousness are inseparable, two sides of a single coin. Anything that damages the Wholeness of the physiology, will inevitably damage the capacity of the physiology to reflect the holistic intelligence of natural law.

Holistic intelligence which Maslow believed was exhibited by self-actualised individuals is quite different from the essentially limited and often linear intelligence of AI systems. Chat bot programmes for example can stitch together diverse sources of information but they often fail to distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong—a deficiency that seems to have been exacerbated during the pandemic.

The capacity for self-actualisation is a quality that marks us as human and differentiates us from animals. Animals are instinctual and thereby limited. Humans are reflective, we have the free will to decide what to do. More than this, ascertaining truth relies not just on logic and evidence but our capacity to correctly interpret and evaluate experience. In its highest sense, this in turn relies on the capacity of our physiology, our DNA, to support a seamless Wholeness of consciousness which we sense as our deep identity, our Self. Knowledge is structured in consciousness.

On the other hand, imagine interfering with the physiological mechanisms which support Wholeness. At the most fundamental level we have suggested in previous articles that these depend on both the integrity of DNA and its expression and upon inter cellular electrical systems in the physiology. Therefore two significant threats to Wholeness and thereby intelligence are posed by gene editing and EMF radiation. Both appear to be capable of reducing the intimacy between Wholeness and intellect.

That is a rather frightening thought, and rightly so, but how much gene experimentation and EMF fields might have damaged our holistic physiological functioning so far still remains to be investigated and understood. We are talking here specifically of the holistic functions of physiology which support higher consciousness and self-actualisation.

You can read more about some of these concepts in our article Evolution, Genetics, Physics and Consciousness. Our appreciation and use of our inner connectedness may be reinforced or possibly reforged through a combination of meditation (a meta-analysis of studies published pre-pandemic has found that meditation increases self-actualisation), diet (watch AUT health expert calling on Kiwis to change what we eat), and a stress-free lifestyle.

In my book Your DNA Diet, I discuss published research which shows how collective dysfunction in society, including crime and other behaviours that bring unhappiness to our world family, can be dissipated through group meditation. This cleansing of the collective consciousness is accompanied by an upsurge in positive behaviours, economic activity, and good health. Thus widespread and collective meditation could assume a vital role in regenerating society.

At the very least, biotechnology experimentation, such as gain of function research, should be stopped immediately. GLOBE is promoting a worldwide campaign for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation. Equally so, the deployment of ever more invasive and powerful EMF fields using frequencies also used by our neural network should be halted. We understand too little about their effects and should take more note of research pointing to EMF injury.

We can take some inspiration from Alfred Tennyson who wrote:

“…Old age hath yet his honour and his toil;

Death closes all: but something ere the end,

Some work of noble note, may yet be done,

Not unbecoming men that strove with Gods.

The lights begin to twinkle from the rocks:

The long day wanes: the slow moon climbs: the deep

Moans round with many voices. Come, my friends,

‘T is not too late to seek a newer world….”

To find out more about consciousness, physics, food and health—press on the links embedded in the article above. You can purchase my book Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet as an Amazon Kindle or order a hard copy here.

Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

In this groundbreaking book, Dr. Guy Hatchard takes a fresh look at the 4.5 billion years of evolution on planet earth.

In everyday language, he explains the findings of the leading edge of quantum cosmology, evolutionary biology, nutrition, and epigenetics then puts these next to the ancient health system of Ayurveda.

The implications for our diet, digestion, and health care are startling.

Tactile version

For those who appreciate the tactile experience of holding a book in hand, Your DNA Diet is available in large A4 format, glossy cover, containing 268 pages, 65 diagrams, charts, and illustrations, many in full colour.

Price NZ$50.00, including postage (New Zealand only).
To order, email your.dna.diet@hatchardreport.com, and we will reply with how to complete the sale.

Electronic version

Available now on Amazon as a Kindle eBook, Your DNA Diet
Don’t have Kindle, no worries; download the free Kindle App

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Death Stalks mRNA Vaccination in New Zealand

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Death Stalks mRNA Vaccination in New Zealand

As we enter into another year, excess all cause deaths for the first six weeks of 2023 in New Zealand are running at 700 deaths higher than the long term 2010 to 2019 average (as reported by the authoritative Human Mortality Database which tabulates official New Zealand government data).

Allowing for an increase in the population of New Zealand since 2019 of 269,000, excess deaths are running approximately 17% above 2019 rates and 24% higher than the excess death rate over the same six week period in 2022. In other words, the rate of excess deaths appears to be accelerating. That should be alarming and certainly cause for discussion and analysis, but apparently, no one in authority cares.

Quite the reverse actually, government experts are busy trying to hide what is going on. New Zealand vaccinologist Helen Petousis-Harris and epidemiologist Michael Baker have been giving interviews to the international press to refute widely circulating claims that the New Zealand excess deaths might be related to mRNA vaccination.

A March 9th USA Today article masquerading as a Fact Check (???) concedes 2022 New Zealand all cause mortality was actually 10% higher than 2021 but quotes Michael Baker who says:

“There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination is causing excess mortality. Quite the contrary, high vaccination coverage in New Zealand has prevented many deaths that would have occurred if this virus had circulated before the population had the opportunity to be vaccinated.”

Helen Petousis-Harris goes one step further telling USA Today:

“The fact that vaccinated people are less likely to die than unvaccinated people directly refutes this fantasy”

Baker and Harris omit to mention the recent data released by the New Zealand Ministry of Health revealing that in 2022 boosted individuals disproportionately suffered increased deaths when compared to the unvaccinated (check it out here). Petousis-Harris didn’t present evidence to support her claim, and USA Today didn’t ask for it. Her university position and her record as a paid Pfizer advisor was enough for them. So much for USA Today as a fact checker, it merits an F grade or something lower.

Petousis-Harris also conveniently forgot to tell USA Today about her RNZ media interview in October 2022 in which she said:

On a fourth booster: “I wouldn’t be running out to get myself boosted. I don’t think it would be particularly useful. I don’t see any evidence to suggest it is going to benefit me.”

On the Moderna bivalent booster: “I think that the expectations for the new bivalent vaccines exceed the evidence. Probably not a lot [of protection against Omicron]”

So 2023 New Zealand excess deaths are running up 17% on the long term average, on track to top 2022, but our local experts are scurrying around shilling for the government line that there is nothing to see here. How could that be? You tell me. I’m puzzled and I’m not alone. Substack commentator Steve Kirsch reports: “New Israeli MoH study shows COVID vax increases your risk of death over time“, but the authors of the study blame not the vaccine but something they call the ‘Healthy Vaccinee Effect’ (HVE).

Put rather crudely, HVE theory suggests that people were about to die but received the Covid vaccine and as a result their health picked up. Four months later their fate caught up with them and they died anyway. None of this stacks up statistically and doesn’t match the data, but faith in mRNA vaccines is so high among those highly paid to administer, promote, and research them that almost any crazy argument is acceptable to hide the rising excess deaths and make Covid vaccines sound wonderful.

You can see what is happening can’t you? Unlike Petousis-Harris, the authors of the Israeli study are obliged to admit that people are consistently dying in the months post vaccination. So they make up an argument that fits their ‘vaccines are wonderful’ narrative, even if it doesn’t match the data. All this makes you wonder what on earth is going on. Have these people lost their marbles? Do they think that we are so dumb we won’t notice?

At this point in time, the evidence for the dangers of Covid vaccines is utterly overwhelming. Sometimes we naively think we can use logic, data, and scientific evidence, to persuade Covid vaccine proponents of the dangers, but this is not working out. Like addicted gamblers, they are unable to change tack, they are placing their same dud bets again.

As a result, we are faced with a situation fraught with multiple potential dangers whose final outcomes are very uncertain. It is a perfect storm of factors and no one in authority wants to know:

  • Excess all cause death rates related to vaccination are increasing
  • The scope and volume of biotechnology experimentation is growing
  • The range of vaccine injuries is expanding to include rare conditions
  • Governments are doubling down on mRNA vaccine promotion

If there is one thing the pandemic data should have told us by now: don’t mess with DNA—it is the anchor that our whole life depends on. DNA is the vital part of the integrated physiological network that supports health, consciousness, and everything that makes us human. How DNA achieves that is little understood and in fact largely unknown, but one thing is clear: DNA achieves this automatically without our personal intervention.

In the process, DNA makes trillions and trillions of healthy decisions on our behalf every day. mRNA vaccines do the reverse. They constrain the DNA deep inside the cell nucleus to express itself differently, overriding natural immune responses in the cells affected. According to eminent geneticists writing as early as January 2020, disastrous outcomes are inevitable including total system collapse.

This results from a perfect storm of factors, particularly including suppression of immune efficiency. Another factor is contamination of Covid vaccines with left-over expression vectors used in the manufacture of mRNAs. Recently reported assays could point to contamination levels 100-fold higher than originally proposed and imply trillions of replication-competent DNA circular plasmid molecules per vaccine dose. These could possibly be responsible for turbo charging cancers and/or bacterial infections.

The safety research to investigate these possibilities was never undertaken. If you go to threads dealing with vaccine injury you will see multiple cases of septic shock following Covid vaccination, which can result in amputation of limbs. The tenor of these reports is that simple infections like flu can suddenly turn into rare life-threatening diseases as in this case reported in the Herald this morning (without mentioning mRNA vaccination). If the immune system is suppressed, total system stability of physiology is at risk.

Our health depends on a healthy relationship between our DNA and the global biosphere. The quality of our food sources and water, climatic conditions including sunshine, rainfall, wind, temperature, the air we breathe, seasonal and daily routines, family and social interactions all play their part, but overriding all of these factors and commanding the dance of life, DNA is the silent controller of immunity. DNA is orchestrating health, it is automatically doing so through the instrumentality of all the laws of nature. If you think you can do better than that, think again. The data is in, mRNA vaccines alter the way DNA expresses itself and that can be fatal. They don’t work, more than that, they are very dangerous. Death is stalking mRNA vaccination.

Te Whatu Ora Preens Its Feathers in the Face of Death

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Te Whatu Ora Preens Its Feathers in the Face of Death

Unprecedented elevated excess death rates in highly vaccinated countries around the world, including ours, are continuing, but health authorities are still looking the other way or worse, trying to normalise sudden unexpected death. People of working age are dying suddenly and unexpectedly, but health authorities are very keen that we don’t think it unusual.

Divya Simon, 31, a New Zealand rest home nurse, had her third booster vaccination, next morning she felt unwell. She had chest pains and dizzy spells and was unable to work, classic symptoms of an mRNA vaccine reaction. Two days later, she suffered a massive heart attack, and the following day she died in ICU. Incredibly the coroner has ruled that this was not related to the Covid mRNA booster.

The coroner found that an angiogram had been unable to determine a cause of the cardiac arrest, nor did Simon’s medical records throw any light on the cause, but the coroner discounted any role of the vaccine on the advice of the pathologist who vaguely ascribed a cause of death, saying it was “likely due to an underlying weakness [??] in the coronary arteries”. In other words, no one in authority knows why she died, but they don’t care as long as it is not the vaccine.

The Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring (CARM) came to the same blame deflecting conclusion. During the two years of Covid vaccines in New Zealand, CARM has only admitted that two deaths are due to vaccine induced injury. It has continued to stonewall any suggestion of vaccine involvement despite our excess deaths running at unprecedented record levels.

A Forensic Files episode reveals just how strange this is. Pre-Covid, a pathologist is depicted struggling to determine the cause of a sudden death of a young person. She says she is determined to get to the bottom of it because sudden death of young working age persons is so unusual—at the time you couldn’t leave it superficially investigated. It is no longer unusual, but the authorities are unconcerned to look deeper.

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

Edward Dowd, Hedge Fund Manager, and finance data analyst has clearly demonstrated in his book “The Epidemic of Sudden Death in 2021 and 2022” that the employed population of the US has had worse health outcomes in disability and excess death since the introduction of Covid vaccines. Normally the employed have the best health outcomes. If it’s not vaccine related what is it? Why are the authorities not asking why? Dowd’s answer:

“They know why and they are in cover up mode for the greatest biomedical health catastrophe ever implemented in the history of humanity.”

New studies are being published every week which point to the causal involvement of mRNA vaccines in record hospitalisations and death rates from a range causes, but they are being ignored. Alarmingly, scientists are realising that some adverse effects are very common indeed. We know about myocarditis and acute kidney injury following Covid vaccination, here are some hints about what else is happening:

Brain Injury

An article in BBC news today recounts the harrowing experience of a British Olympian women’s rugby sevens player Abi Burton who experienced persistent mental health episodes following her return from the July 2021 Olympics including depression, seizures, and manic aggression. Eventually, she was diagnosed as psychotic and sectioned to a psychiatric hospital.

Fortunately, a member of the staff was a specialist in autoimmune diseases. After tests, Burton was diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis, which occurs when the body’s immune system mistakenly attacks the brain. According to a clinician, this is a very rare neurological disease that presents major challenges for clinicians worldwide to diagnose and investigate. A glance through current references shows it is suddenly becoming a more common topic. Why?

Multiple investigators are reporting an association between autoimmune encephalitis and mRNA vaccination, including the following:

Acute encephalitis after COVID-19 vaccination: A case report and literature review

A case of encephalitis following COVID-19 vaccine

Case Report: Anti-LGI1 Encephalitis Following COVID-19 Vaccination

A Possible Case of Autoimmune Encephalitis After mRNA COVID-19 Booster Vaccine: A Case Report

A study just published 6th March 2023 entitled “Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Real-World Data Analysis” identified over 6,000 patients with diabetes who received a COVID-19 vaccination and compared them to 20,000 diabetes-free controls who were vaccinated. Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) were more likely to experience eight severe adverse events than controls including: cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, encephalitis myelitis encephalomyelitis, Bell’s palsy, lymphadenopathy, ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and pulmonary embolism. The authors recommend careful monitoring of severe adverse events in patients with T2DM may be necessary, especially for those related to thrombotic events and neurological dysfunctions after COVID-19 vaccination.

Rugby player Burton was almost certainly required to be vaccinated to attend the Olympics in Japan, but the BBC article makes no mention of this. Consequently, we have no idea whether her health difficulties with this formerly very ‘rare’ illness were in any way related to Covid vaccination. We do, however, know that patients with diabetes are being prioritised to receive Covid vaccination because they are considered to be at risk from Covid. It now appears that Covid vaccination is exposing them to a range of severe risks. The authors of the T2DM study point out the risk is highest for those receiving the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Why on earth are we continuing to offer it?

Covid Vaccines Affect Women of Child-bearing Age

We have reached the point now where the hugely powerful technique of meta-analysis can be applied to multiple studies of single disease categories. A meta-analysis of 16 previously completed studies published 2nd March 2023 entitled “COVID-19 Vaccination and Menstrual Disorders Among Women: Findings from a meta-Analysis Study” has found that following Covid vaccination:

24% suffer menorrhagia—(heavy bleeding lasting more than seven days).

23% suffer oligomenorrhea—(infrequent periods, fewer than 6 per year)

16% suffer polymenorrhea—(period intervals less than 21 days).

Combine this with the reports of mathematician Igor Chudov and others who have posted multiple reports of reduced birth rates in the EU and highly vaccinated countries around the world in the year following Covid vaccination and you know a problem is being swept under the carpet. It needs to be acknowledged and investigated.

An article in the NZ Herald yesterday admits that our department of health is not very good at investigating anything. They seem to specialise in making figures look rosy for themselves, even if it means cutting a few corners and hiding some unfortunate truths. Tell me about it. Covid vaccines are increasing our risk of death, but the government doesn’t want us to know. Against all evidence, they are encouraging everyone over thirty to get another booster. Like a gambling addict, they are rolling the dice again and again on our behalf.

What Should a Real Preventive Health System Look Like?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
What Should a Real Preventive Health System Look Like?

A report in the Times newspaper entitled “Moderna to build £150m vaccine centre in UK after NHS deal” records the misplaced enthusiasm of UK Health Secretary Steve Barclay for a failed system:

“Moderna’s new innovation and technology centre means NHS patients will have access to cutting-edge mRNA vaccines to fight against future variants of Covid, as well as other respiratory viruses.”

The deal follows lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry to avoid a levy on their revenues instituted to control NHS spending on drugs. The sector has warned that the voluntary scheme for branded medicines pricing and access could deter companies from investing in the UK. Accordingly, the Moderna deal includes a ‘guaranteed purchase clause’.

In other words, the Moderna deal appears to guarantee that the UK government will buy future Moderna mRNA vaccines come what may. It will also bypass regulations designed to control the excessive profits of pharmaceutical companies. The deal is expected to be followed by another with BioNtech (a partner of Pfizer).

The article makes no mention of the excessive rate of adverse effects and fatalities associated with Moderna and Pfizer vaccines. It is as if the UK government has determined these high rates of medical injury are acceptable and will have to continue regardless—a blank cheque for risky biotechnology medicine.

This is Not an Isolated Incident

Drugs with high rates of side effects are gaining not only approval but positive encouragement from governments and/or the media. An article in the New York Post, “Hollywood weight-loss drugs could trigger deadly side effect, researchers claim,” reports a new study of approved weight loss drugs Ozempic and Wegovy used to treat clinical obesity and type 2 diabetes.

According to the study entitled “A potentially serious adverse effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists“:

“Long-term adverse events such as increased risk of intestinal obstruction have been reported in diabetic patients, which is 4.5 times higher than those receiving other glucose control medications.”

The study monitored disturbing restrictive changes in the intestinal structure of rats taking the drugs. The authors concluded:

“Since intestinal obstruction is a fatal condition that requires surgery, clinicians should be aware that the emergence of chronic adverse events of GLP-1RAs may involve the small intestine. If the underlying cause of which remains unknown, erroneous inferences will likely be drawn. This is of particular importance as the use of GLP-1RAs [Ozempic and Wegovy] in treating multiple disorders is expanding tremendously.”

In recent months, injections of the weight-loss drug have been taking over Hollywood, as many stars have admitted to taking it at one point or another, including comedian Chelsea Handler, who claimed that she “didn’t know” she was taking Ozempic. She alleged that her doctor just “hands it out” to anyone.

Confirming the laissez faire about adverse effects, independent medical experts (???) consulted by the NY Post offered the reassuring opinion “the medication should be safe for most”. In other words, casualties are inevitable but apparently unimportant in the push to roll out new profitable drugs which might help you look like a slim Hollywood star (in a coffin).

Politicians Have No Knowledge of Biotechnology Safety

I can’t help but think of the recent tragic earthquake in southern Turkey. Some of the buildings that collapsed were very modern and designed to withstand shocks. Reportedly in a number of buildings, columns essential to structural integrity had been illegally removed to create large open spaces for retail and other projects. The foundations should never have been tampered with. Those doing so, had no knowledge of structural engineering and the implications for building stability, just as our politicians have no knowledge of biotechnology safety or scope.

Genetic structure and its expressed biochemistry forms the essential foundational basis of our enormously complex physiological system. Yet modern medicine has come to be reframed in terms of tinkering with these foundational genetic principles, seemingly unconcerned that this is known in documented cases to lead to mutagenic physiological instability—total system collapse which is all too often fatal.

As researchers look deeper into physiology, biochemistry and genetics, they seem to have missed the point that there are actually very effective safe simple natural strategies to prevent or alleviate a wide range of illnesses. Strategies which don’t cost a lot and can be rolled out through public education offered through the mass media, doctor’s surgeries, and classrooms, as well as legislative and taxation options such as those used to control smoking and excessive alcohol consumption.

Smarter Lifestyle Choices

I have discussed many of these issues and offered solutions in my book Your DNA Diet. Ultra processed foods are unhealthy, fresh foods are incredibly beneficial. The same is true of sedentary lifestyle versus regular exercise. Sufficient rest, routine, a lighter natural diet with more variety, enough fluids,… The list might appear to be a long one but very easy to follow once a few essential principles are grasped. No great expertise is required on the part of individuals, but if the government remains intent on pushing pharmaceutical magic bullets as the gold standard of prevention, little progress will be made among the general public.

There is a tendency among the public to lump all medical endeavours together under the ‘miracle’ banner. However, safety and effectiveness are not uniform. Heart surgery, transplants, and hip replacements for example are truly miraculous surgical fixes for conditions that in bygone days were automatic death sentences. But remember that more than 50% of the population now suffer from chronic health conditions for which there is no pharmaceutical cure, merely palliative pain relief and all the addictive problems this entails (well illustrated by the opioid addiction epidemic). Many of these problems such as diabetes and other inflammatory illnesses are known to be effectively addressed by natural options. Options that do not figure in current professional medical education.

The potential profits involved in biotech medicine are mouth watering for big pharma. The government seems to have swallowed the bitter pill on offer. They are gladly handing over billions for overhyped biotech research, when the early research outcomes haven’t worked and aren’t safe. We have been guinea pigs in a failed experiment. In fact, even just doing nothing might have produced a better pandemic outcome for the government. NBC News reports a study has found “Immunity acquired from a Covid infection is as protective as vaccination against severe illness and death”.

Let us just replay that: trillions of dollars have been spent and lost globally (estimates vary up to $114 trillion, more than the world’s total annual GDP), money that you and I will struggle to repay for decades in increased taxes and a reduced standard of living. After millions of lives lost, we might have been better off trusting our natural immunity to pull us through, along with a few simple lifestyle and dietary adjustments. Just remember that the NZ government officially labelled ‘natural immunity’ a conspiracy theory (yes, they did). Idiots.

Historically New Zealand Has Been a Leader in Public Health Provision

The 1938 Social Security Act provided government funded healthcare for all, ten years ahead of the formation of the NHS in the UK. But whether there is funded public health provision or not, medical systems around the world have become monolithic structures dominated by the wide reach of pharmaceutical company dollars. The profit-orientated structure of healthcare and regulation has dictated that this is the case everywhere. Governments could have distanced themselves, but they have chosen not to do so and instead fallen into the trap. As is the case with the latest Moderna UK deal, clever lobbying and financial arrangements have placed blinkers on health policy (the US version of the UK deal: NIAID funds gain of function research at Wuhan, Moderna rewards NIAID with $400 million).

This involves a carefully curated web of mutual interest. Pharmaceutical interests have been controlling these since the start of government funded healthcare and large scale integrated health systems such as those in the USA. Media in the internet age relies on new sources of funding which include incentives designed to influence content. These can come from corporate bodies including pharmaceutical companies. They can also come in the form of direct government support as happened in New Zealand and elsewhere. Governments rely on the support of the media to get elected. The income of medical professionals relies on big pharma incentives and government funding. Finally, governments feel obliged to support the commercial imperatives of investors in biotech and big pharma. They are all looking towards each other but away from the obvious truth.

There is no doubt that the term ‘blinkered’ is the right descriptor to use. Blinkers that now only allow for a biotech road ahead, a cul de sac which inevitably ends with the destruction of health. Moreover, the commercial arrangements that have come to dominate healthcare are self-destructive on an industrial scale. The casualties are starting to mount beyond millions and growing. The instigators are systematically destroying their own interests and their own health. Every day we read reports of sudden and unexpected death among all ages, but the government and media maintain near total silence about the causes. At this stage, the end result is not in doubt.

How We Face This Future Might Be Up to Us

… but the window allowing medical choice is being firmly closed. The practices involved are monopolistic. The pandemic has brought us face to face with legislation and international agreements designed to restrict or outlaw alternative approaches and even punish those exercising the right to choose. These are particularly the result of efforts by the pharmaceutical industry to control regulatory structures at ICMRA and WHO. The consequent loss of national sovereignty has involved the ultimate betrayal of the duty of care that governments owe to their people. By this very act, politicians have lost their legitimacy and any moral right to dictate healthcare funding and policy. Governments, health czars, and the media have failed to protect us.

Negotiating this minefield is complex and challenging, we have to step back and look at the big picture in a way that governments seem unable to comprehend. The forces of the natural world remain in ultimate charge. The air, water, sunlight, soil and plants on which we rely are the ultimate sources of our health and will remain so. They need to be honoured and utilised. It will take all of our intelligence to continue to do so, but ultimately there is no other way.

Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

In this groundbreaking book, Dr. Guy Hatchard takes a fresh look at the 4.5 billion years of evolution on planet earth.

In everyday language, he explains the findings of the leading edge of quantum cosmology, evolutionary biology, nutrition, and epigenetics then puts these next to the ancient health system of Ayurveda.

The implications for our diet, digestion, and health care are startling.

Tactile version

For those who appreciate the tactile experience of holding a book in hand, Your DNA Diet is available in large A4 format, glossy cover, containing 268 pages, 65 diagrams, charts, and illustrations, many in full colour.

Price NZ$50.00, including postage (New Zealand only).
To order, email your.dna.diet@hatchardreport.com, and we will reply with how to complete the sale.

Electronic version

Available now on Amazon as a Kindle eBook, Your DNA Diet
Don’t have Kindle, no worries; download the free Kindle App

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.
1...222324...48Page 23 of 48