Home Blog Page 24

Manipulation of Public Opinion During the Early Months of the Pandemic has led toย โ€˜Learned Helplessness.โ€™

Damaging revelationsย from UK Health Minister Matt Hancockโ€™s 13th December 2020 private WhatsApp messaging show just how much the UK government sought to manipulate the public and their own party. Tory MPs were against stricter lockdown measures, but Hancock messaged his media advisor Damon Poole:

โ€œWe frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain [Covid Alpha]โ€

Poole: โ€œYep, that is what will get us proper behavioural changeโ€

Hancock: โ€œWhen do we deploy the new variant?โ€

After his television interviews in January carrying the same fear-based messaging running up to the vaccine rollout, Hancock received congratulations from a supporter that he hadย โ€˜come over wellโ€™ย and thatย โ€˜a well handled crisis of this scale could propel you into the next league, and break you through in terms of public perception.โ€™

Hancock also moved to exclude dissenting voices within the group of SAGE scientists advising the government. Talking about Dr. Jeremy Farrar, he said

โ€œHe needs to be either inside the tent and onside, or outsideโ€ฆโ€

Were Hancock and Other Leaders Around the World Right to Press the Fear Button?

Remember, at the time, we were seeing pictures of morgues overwhelmed in New York City. Accounts were being published of mass deaths among the elderly in many countries, including Italy. We now realise that these deaths were not evenly spread. NYC had a huge surge in deaths, but nearby Boston did not. They had a rash of asymptomatic cases. Bergamo, Italy had an 800% increase in excess deaths, nearby Po Valley did not.

A closer look reveals an alternative possibilityโ€”a panicked pandemic response may have been helping to drive deaths up. Foreign health care workers abandoned their posts in Italy, while fearful relatives (the traditional elderly carers in the Italian family system) stayed away from those stricken. The elderly are particularly vulnerable and can easily succumb to changes in their routine, especially when given an added dose of fear.

To illustrate the effect of fear, psychologist Martin Seligman performed an experiment in the 1960s which demonstrated that helplessness and resignation to fate can be learned. Seligman subjected dogs to the pain of repeated electric shocks (not something that can happen now). They were offered no escape from the repeated administration of pain. The dogs were transferred to a holding pen where there was easy access to an escape route, but when the shocks started up the dogs did not try to escape because they had been conditioned to believe they were helpless. They just lay down and whimpered. In contrast, dogs who had not been conditioned to accept pain as inevitable took the opportunity to escape when the shocks began.

Seligman subsequently found that the way people view negative events that happen to them can have an impact on whether they feel helpless or not. It is not just possible, but certain, that Hancock and many other politiciansโ€™ repeated conditioning of the public and health care workers led to the belief that Covid was inevitably deadly. This left many feeling helpless and maybe even giving up their fight to survive infection.

โ€˜Learned Helplessnessโ€™ Might Have Played a Part in Perpetuating the Pandemic.

Seligmanโ€™s early work has led to a greater understanding of trauma and helped us to understand why victims of trauma can suffer behavioural afflictions for years afterward. They may continue to fear the worst even when the original cause of the trauma has disappeared. They may feel threatened and compelled to take evasive action, even when there is no longer any threat, just because of some sensory trigger that reminds them of past events. They may be stuck with their sense of helplessness and nonsensical responses, even when informed that there is no cause to fear anymore.

At this point in time, we have certainly entered that phase of the pandemic when the actual danger that Covid poses is very low, but the fear of it remains high. Many people are still obsessively masking, demanding more shots, and blaming the unvaccinated. Research has shown that mRNA Covid vaccines are ineffective and even dangerous to health, but many feel compelled to reject this information. They have been conditioned by repeated publicity to cling to the idea that they are being and will be protected in future by repeated inoculations, when the opposite is actually the case.

Fear and stress is known to have an impact on physical and mental health. It has been linked to increased incidence of cardiovascular illness, depression, cancer, etc. The number with long term sickness and disability in the UK increased by 462,000 between 2019 and 2022. Young people are particularly affected. A remarkable rise whose causes remain uninvestigated by authorities. The causes are likely to include long covid, covid vaccine adverse effects, and pandemic stress, although the proportional allocation between these potential causes is unknown.

Importantly we need to know how to escape from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Learned Helplessness is a mental condition that โ€˜cagesโ€™ our psychology. We become trapped by false expectations of failure. I spent a year in the 1990s helping people in Armenia with PTSD following the massive earthquake which killed 25,000. PTSD symptoms are inclusive of learned helplessness. It is amazing how meditation administered on a mass scale (we taught 35,000 people to meditate) can rapidly reverse the symptoms of PTSD (I discuss this in my book Your DNA Diet). We also need a political solution.

What Are the Political Lessons?

It is also important to understand that governments around the world (in conjunction with global organisations like WEF, WHO, and pharmaceutical interests) egged each other on to more and more extreme positions on the possible effects of Covid. To justify their policies, politicians including our own, pointed to other countries saying โ€˜we canโ€™t be wrong, look they have reached the same conclusions as we have.โ€™ In reality, it was a case of the blind leading the blind and vice versa. This is one of the common pitfalls of globalisation. News stories from distant countries describing the effects of policy or events, often do not contain sufficient context or data to justify any conclusions.

It now appears likely that it was the official response to the pandemic, especially the Covid vaccines, that have been responsible for far more deaths than Covid itself and are still driving excess deaths higher. Ministers like Hancock, as well as Ardern and Hipkins here in New Zealand, placed undue reliance on exaggerated press reports of isolated worst case outcomes in foreign individual settings. This gave rise to wholly false modelling of potential pandemic deaths. The statistical analysis of outcomes on a wider scale was telling a different storyโ€”Covid was no more deadly than flu.

The extremism involved in the public messaging struck a chord with those in positions of authority in the medical profession. Look at this thread for a run down on how this evolved to become an almost fanatical faith in Covid vaccination and a determination to enforce compliance whilst ignoring or even hiding safety signals. Something that is still continuing. The very people charged with protecting health, were betraying the trust placed in them.

Our democratic institutions have been placed under enormous strain by the pandemic, their inherent flaws have also been exposed. Routine elections (every three years in New Zealand) mean that politicians cannot be judged by long term outcomes. Politicians often experiment by implementing extreme ideas or flex their inexperienced muscles on ill thought out policy. Naive leaders who have gained election through their PR skills rather than competence, find themselves completely at sea when governing a nation. Many leaders like Jacinda Ardern and Nicola Sturgeon have then simply walked away leaving a mess for others to address.

Historically, Life Was a Natural Balance Between the Individual and Social Interest.

Society was formed from a complex set of personal interactions and transactions between individuals, families, and groups. In the modern world, there is increasing emphasis on the individual and increasing isolation of individuals from society. Modern appliances, housing, working environments, and lifestyles free many from the need to directly interact with others. Therefore many have abrogated social responsibility and unthinkingly look to the elected government to hold society together, an endeavour in which politicians are singularly ill-equipped to succeed.

Collectively we have come to suffer from learned helplessness. We falsely believe that only the government is capable of deciding matters pertaining to health and employment, whereas previously, many functions of society were formed by day to day decisions and actions of members of society (ourselves). Gradually governments have extended their influence and power. We are going cap in hand to governments to ask them to fix things which previously were outside of the government remit. For example, during the pandemic (and starting even before) individual health choices about treatment have been transferred to governments who act as proxies for pharmaceutical interests. This includes a process of bureaucratic centralisation, which removes decisions from local areas and people.

We will not succeed in changing the situation unless we both change ourselves and reform the rules through which society functions. There are many stakeholders in society that governments have begun to ignore. Parliamentary privilege allows politicians to lie with impunity. They are not subject to the same norms of behaviour that we are. Moreover politicians have felt free to overrule human rights hard won throughout the history of society.

We need to step away from the sense of dependence on multiple vaccines that donโ€™t work and have actually made the problems worse. Health care systems are overwhelmed around the world. The problems are not caused by Covid, but by our response to it. Fear is a powerful weapon that was launched irresponsibly. The consequent trauma cannot be reversed by doing nothing or continuing the faulty narrative.

Admit mistakes and apologise. Compensate injured people. Halt biotechnology experimentation. Entrench the New Zealand Bill of Rights. Prevent companies from enforcing medical mandates.

We have witnessed an assault on freedom, the break up of families, economic decline, a rise in crime, injury and fatality on a massive scale. It can no longer be business as usual. The data from governments around the world, including our own, shows what is going on. Learned helplessness is standing between us and reality.


Guy Hatchard, Ph.D., was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID, a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

A New Beginning or a Sudden End?

You have probably seen renewed discussion of the origin of Covid in the media. As reported by the Wall Street Journal, the US Department of Energy has come down firmly on the side of a laboratory origin of Covid-19 from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. Speaking on Fox News, the former director of US National Intelligence John Ratcliffe commented:

โ€œThe idea that Covid-19 has a natural origin has always been at odds with our intelligenceโ€ฆit is due to a lab leak. From the beginning scientists have not been able to explain why there is a furin cleavage site within the genetic make up of Covid-19โ€ฆThis is something that happens when scientists insert a snippet of manipulated material into virusesโ€.

UK commentator Piers Morgan responded reassuringly:

โ€œI think that the truth is that science, by its very nature, will evolve with facts. And so you have to give them some leeway for that.โ€ฆ.So I do think in the future, we've got to examine the science. You've got to listen to all ranges of opinions, and people have got to stop being canceled on social media for raising concerns, which now look like they were absolutely right.โ€

Popular US Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson went further in a twenty minute excoriation of the Biden administrationโ€™s Covid policy. Carlson wanted to know: has the administrationโ€™s policy to fund biotechnology research in China changed? (Watch Carlson here, begins at 3 minutes).

Some, like late night talk show host Stephen Colbert, have wrongly accused the DOE of lacking sufficient qualifications to decide on the lab leak theory, saying โ€œstay in your laneโ€ (is Colbert even vaguely qualified himself?). In fact as the authoritative Washington Post reports the Department Of Energy employed highly qualified and skilled scientists (including members of the Energy Departmentโ€™s Z-Division, which since the 1960s has been involved in secretive investigations of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons threats by U.S. adversaries, including China and Russia), who undertook detailed scientific assessment of genetic evidence as well as using access to classified information. They went through the kind of discovery process and critical thinking that mathematical biologist Alex Washburne hints at here and here. After the dust of misinformation had cleared the DOEโ€™s conclusion that there was a lab leak was inevitable.

You may think, as we have done here at the Hatchard Report since the first genetic analysis of Covid was completed (see here and here), that the argument is settled, but you would be surprised. The internet and the media are alive with uninformed mocking accusations of bias and irrelevance on the part of the Department Of Energy. Stupidly describing the Department Of Energy as whining. At this point in time, it is clear that the discussion has drifted from science to the realm of political allegiance and unqualified opinions curated by public relations experts working for giant corporations and somewhat shady government interests.

It was the job of the FBI to investigate how the truth was being manipulated and yesterday they also came out firmly and publicly on the side of the lab leak theory (itโ€™s not a theory, there is overwhelming evidence). Early in 2021, a highly qualified geneticist friend wrote to me that he and many of his colleagues were sure that Covid was engineered in a lab because of its highly unusual genetic structure, but he added the codicil: please donโ€™t mention my name. This was going on all over the world in differing forms. Some of them were verging on the corrupt.

Among damning evidence the FBI has uncovered, Kristian Andersen, a British scientist, emailed Anthony Fauci on 31st January 2020, saying the virus looks lab-made. According to this authoritative thread, Fauci called him on 1st February 2020 and ordered him to publicly say it wasnโ€™t lab-made, which he did. Fauci then gave him a $1.88M grant, +$16.5M funding. US officials were manipulating information on a global scale, you decide if that is legal or moral. According to the New York Post, Dr. Fauci is keeping very quiet at this stage following the Department Of Energy and FBI revelations.

All this information is in the public domain, but still, the BBC published two dismissive articles on its front page today. One covered the FBI announcement, but said the FBI conclusion was not backed by any evidence (????). The other was an explainer article entitled โ€œCovid origin: Why the Wuhan lab-leak theory is so disputedโ€. A more blatant attempt to muddy the waters of truth could not be imagined. The article forgot (???) to discuss the genetic evidence that clearly points to gene edited inserts in the virus genome.

But you might ask, why would anyone in government or science seek to hide the truth from the public? Good question. The answer possibly lies in the murky history of military involvement in genetics and the pandemic. You might recall conspiracy theories circulating since the discovery of DNA and gene editing in the 20th century. According to these ideas, military powers were supposedly going to invent weapons that would target specific ethnic groups and win wars because their genetically different opponents were all going to fall down dead, felled by a man-made virus.

In truth, all humans share so much DNA that any genetic weapon is going to adversely affect everyone worldwide including you and me. Remember that military planners are not geneticists, but like almost everyone else on the planet, they are very susceptible to genetic fantasies. They believed wrongly that anything might be possible for genetic science. Whether their motivations were offensive or defensive was irrelevant. To counter any potential offensive weapon from the other side, they were going to have to first create possible offensive weapons, before trying to design a defensive counter. Sound familiar?โ€”gain of function research to weaponise viruses in order to design a vaccine???

The problem we now know is that, as reported in this study, no lab is ever going to be secure. The history of recombinant DNA biotech labs contains a long list of unintended leaks and accidents. The result has been a pandemic whose final outcome still remains unknown. The military, governments, pharmaceutical companies, and scientists from a number of countries are very busy trying to hide their involvement, telling us that all this is just a natural disaster. This amounts to a giant geopolitical coverup. The US, China, Britain, and France all of whom were involved in the creation and funding of the Wuhan Virology Laboratory are paying for favourable comments from their media and anyone else who is corrupt enough to shill for them.

As a last resort, some people are arguing that the origin of Covid is irrelevant, it isnโ€™t. The lab origin of Covid should bring us all together. Whether we think Covid is the main threat or the vaccine is, they both came from a biotech lab carrying out genetic experiments. We can safely forget about the geopolitical arguments explaining who was to blame: China or the USA, and instead shout loudly from the rooftops biotech experiments have got to stop.

Research shows biotech interventions are inherently mutagenic, they have led to permanent degradation of genetic function and consequently health, as this alarmingย recent assessmentย of the Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccine shows (the same vaccine our government has announced it will give to everyone over 30 in New Zealand). So don’t think that by taking the latest vaccine you are helping society. mRNA vaccines pose a danger to everyone in the world, all cultures, all races, religious or agnostic, left or right. We share DNA and we have a common interest to protect ourselves from scientists, media, and governments who are putting financial interests and political objectives ahead of the safety of the entire 8 billion population of the world.

No worries though, our own NZ Herald advises us that the Department Of Energy report on Covid origins is unreliable and only proving to be a spur to drive conspiracy theories(???). In other words, put the US government in the looney bin along with all those scientists urging caution with biotechnology. No need to be concerned New Zealand, forget about record levels of excess deaths, acute kidney injury, heart disease. Off to the beach for what is left of our summer.

It is good to be awake to disingenuous attempts to sanitise the sad history of the pandemic origins and response. The true history is gradually being written after painstaking research on the part of honest people.

You might find all this rather disturbing. The lack of honest discussion from those we have elected or trusted is bewildering and Kafkaesque leading as John Williams has said to uniquely modern traumas: existential alienation, isolation and insecurity, the labyrinth of state bureaucracy, the corrupt abuse of totalitarian power [including media manipulation], the impenetrable tangle of legal systems, and finally the knock on the door in the middle of the night. In our case, it is the knock of the next virus on our door that we await with dread fueled by state sponsored fear mongering and the risks of uncontrolled biotech experimentation.

To counter this, we have control over our own inner self. We are not without power. In fact, we hold the key to resolve our situation.

From my research, even before the pandemic, I had already come to the opinion that our exact genetic makeup is intimately tied to the health and consciousness of the individual and society. Individuals are connected together in families, cities, nations, and the world as a whole through our genetic similarities which forge biolinks and interdependencies. We are part of a worldwide biological system containing distinct individual genetic structures which resonate and pair with other genetic structures according to their similarity. This is the physical basis of societyโ€”a genetic network.

More than this, each distinct individual genetic structure is paired with and supports a form of awareness or consciousness. DNA and consciousness are two sides of a single coin. Genetic networks are paired with levels of collective consciousnessโ€”family consciousness, city consciousness, national consciousness, and world consciousness. Ultimately the world is our family.

Edit DNA, or the way DNA expresses itself as Covid mRNA vaccines do, you are potentially damaging the most sophisticated abilities of the individualโ€”our capacity for stable physiological function (health, life even) self-reflection, and societal organisation. The outcome of the pandemic has only served to underline the truth of this, look around at the prevalent disorganisation, disagreement, and disarray.

Our response at the Hatchard Report is simple. For knowledge to be reliable three elements of verification can and should be applied:

  • personal experience (commonsense evidence of the senses and events),
  • scientific rigor (is it rational and supported by experiment?),
  • traditional use (has it stood the test of time?).

Boiled down to its fundamentals, there are only a few elements of life which we personally controlโ€”Experience, Food, Behaviour, and Consciousness. This is our formula in these uncertain times:

  • Behave with Kindness and speak the Truth. This is the wisdom of the ages.
  • Food in all its forms should be Natural. (Natureโ€™s garden is our larder, unadulterated by synthetics, fresh and minimally processed).
  • Prefer your Experience to be what you wish to Become. Where is the time for the unwanted? Take time to enjoy.
  • Ancient culture valued Transcendence. Periods of deep inner silence are the foundation of happiness. Techniques of meditation and reflection have stood the test of time.

This last is the most forgotten in modern life, if anything is to succeed in ushering in a better world, it has to come from the most settled, integrated, and unified state of our consciousness. As we have discussed at length in other articles, the unified level of natureโ€™s intelligence is guiding the whole natural world. This can be appreciated on a path to personal development and the expansion of consciousness. Our world is as we are.

At the moment people like Stephen Colbert and millions of others are rushing to conclusions, why canโ€™t they take time to think about the implications?

As Rudyard Kipling said in his famous โ€œA Fathers Advice to His Sonโ€:

โ€œIf you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting tooโ€ฆ.โ€

We are going through an unprecedented societal upheaval. It increasingly appears to be man-made. The repeated political mantra โ€œTrust the Scienceโ€ has proven to be mere political demagogory, devoid of real scientific content. Keeping a steady head, carefully shifting through the evidence, and applying caution are needed now. The evidence is out: with confidence we know that Covid and Covid vaccines came from laboratories whose operation is inherently dangerous. They have already killed millions, and want to be given carte blanche to do whatever they wish. Time to call a halt. For more information go to https://GLOBE.GLOBAL

Open Letter to Prime Minister Chris Hipkins and New Zealand Parliament

0

The first two months in 2023 present us with a turning point in the legal arguments around Covid-19 vaccination in New Zealand.

To: The Hon. Prime Minister Chris Hipkins

Two publications by the Ministry of Health itself present evidence that within the government there is knowledge that the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine cannot be regarded as safe and effective. Therefore from this point in time forward, there is no credible legal defence that the government can advance to cover its failure to openly inform individuals and the public at large of the inherent health risks of Covid vaccines.

Up until this point in time, the governmentโ€™s public announcements, including your own under the previous administration, relied on the argument that the government is โ€˜following the scienceโ€™ and monitoring international Covid journal publishing. This was never credible, but allowed room for a fanciful defence (certainly a weak argument) of โ€˜accident, ignorance, misapprehension, or misdirectionโ€™ in any possible legal case brought under criminal or civil law. This can no longer be the case.

Firstly a preprint paper was published on 3 February 2023 in the Lancet authored by our own Ministry of Health โ€œAdverse Events Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech) in Aotearoa New Zealandโ€. The paper reveals there is a statistically significant association between Pfizer mRNA vaccination and both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI).

Acute kidney injury (AKI), also known as acute renal failure (ARF), is a sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that happens within a few hours or a few days. AKI causes a build-up of waste products in your blood and makes it hard for your kidneys to keep the right balance of fluid in your body. AKI can also affect other organs such as the brain, heart, and lungs.

The study examined the comprehensive medical records of 4 million NZers. There were 1778 more cases of AKI than predicted from historical pre-pandemic rates. An alarming rate of 1 case for every 2,200 vaccinations. In addition to AKI and Myocarditis, researchers also found elevated rates of blood clots and platelet damage.

Secondly, information concerning mortality in 2021, 2022, and 2023 correlated with vaccination status has been released by Te Whata Oraโ€”Health New Zealand following a Freedom of Information (OIA) request. The figures are signed off by Astrid Koornneef, Interim Director of Prevention, National Public Health Service.

The released figures include all NZ registered deaths by month. The figures show that for the last six months of 2022, 80% of all people dying in New Zealand had received Pfizer mRNA booster shots. Yet according to official government figures updated 14 February 2023 only 73.2% of those eligible (18+ years) have received a booster. In other words, booster recipients are disproportionately represented among registered all-cause deaths. For more analysis refer here.

These two data sets certainly point towards serious risks associated with Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccination and stand in need of further investigation. The first only investigated outcomes within 21 days of Covid vaccination, the second indicates serious effects persist in the general population past 21 days. Taken together these point to a need for analysis of the causes of the current high rates of hospital admissions and deaths with reference to vaccination status.

Despite the ongoing need for more investigation, the results are sufficiently concerning according to ordinary standards of vaccine risk assessment to require an immediate halt to vaccine administration. This has not happened. Instead your Minister of Health, Ayesha Verrall has announced a new booster shot for everyone over 30. Verrall did not reveal the concerning new safety data to the public. Instead she has urged people to receive the vaccine as a priority.

Findings of this type are not unique to New Zealand, increasingly publications in learned journals are highlighting concerns about Covid vaccine safety. There is much academic debate in progress which has received little or no coverage in New Zealand media. Your government appears to share the burden of responsibility for a lack of balanced coverage in NZ mainstream media.

There appears to be a misapprehension among NZ health professionals concerning the reliability of biotechnology vaccine manufacturing standards. Data points to huge variability in safety by vaccine batch. The following chart records serious vaccine injury and death by batch number in the USA sourced from publicly available VAERS data sets. You can see that the number of injuries varies hugely by batch. A few injury numbers are similar to those recorded following flu vaccination, but most batches lead to injury volumes considerably higher, up to 14 times higher.

As early as January 18 2021 Orange County California medical authorities flagged an unusually high pattern of injury and death associated with a single batch they had been administering. Pfizer should have immediately alerted New Zealand authorities to such anomalies. They probably had a contractual obligation to do so. Now that it has become a matter of public comment, it should not be possible to continue to assert Covid vaccine safety. New Zealand has a code of Good Manufacturing Process for pharmaceuticals. This includes a requirement for uniformity of pharmaceutical medicine contents and action. Apparently, Pfizer Covid vaccines do not meet our code.

The scientific evidence concerning the lack of Covid vaccine safety has not reduced the stitched up action of government intelligence services, the police, and Te Punaha Matatiniโ€™s Disinformation Project in coordination with media and social media to monitor and reduce the reach of those raising pertinent questions. As you know, under the Prime Ministerโ€™s office there is interagency coordination for mis/disinformation monitoring and response. This involves multiple government departments. If these programmes and participants are not fully informed of the legitimacy of concerns about Covid vaccine safety, this amounts to misdirection and possibly harassment on the part of the Prime Ministerโ€™s office itself.

I and many others believe New Zealand has struggled to define its relationship with unregulated global influences in the modern era. There is much scope for commercial and geopolitical misdirection even via established channels of medical, military, and political cooperation. We need to be more alert as a nation to our own sovereign and economic interests especially when we consider health and the legal protections that have been afforded to multinational interests like Pfizer and others.

You are newly appointed to a position of power and influence. You have stated that you intend to reconsider the policies followed under your predecessor. It was therefore very surprising to find your Minister of Health doubling down on vaccine requirements against the weight of her own departmentโ€™s findings. I urge you to look into this very thoroughly. As a trained lawyer, I expect you realise that going against the weight of safety evidence is very much a betrayal of the trust the public has placed in the government.

I hope you will announce a revision and retraction of Covid response policies in the light of the new evidence that is being published. Apparently New Zealand has acquired 1.7 million doses of Pfizer bi-valent vaccines. Why? Have you considered returning them as not fit for purpose? The weight of evidence points in that direction. Evidence that is accumulating by the week in learned journals.

It seems clear that we have passed a point where policy mistakes can be described as accidental, if continued they will appear to be deliberate. The public stands in need of an honest explanation. It may take courage to speak out, but doing so will be a mark of integrity and genuine concern for health and safety.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

In a Burst of Psychopathic Schizophrenia – Everyone Over the Age of 30 to Receive New Boosters

0

In a burst of psychopathic schizophrenia, the New Zealand government calls for everyone over the age of 30 to receive new boosters and simultaneously releases public health data showing that boosters are ineffective and deadly.

It is increasingly hard to make any sense of the New Zealand government’s Covid policy. A paper completed by our Ministry of Health and published in the Lancet foundย high rates of Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury associated with Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccination. Data released two days ago under an OIAย (freedom of information) request shows thatย boosted individuals in NZ disproportionately contribute to record levels of all cause mortalityย (described by overseas commentators asย devastating).

Yet today Health Minister Ayesha Verrall announced a new Covid-19 vaccine as a booster for everyone over 30. It appears that die hard vaccine fanatics have gained the upper hand in the circular Beehive corridors of power under new PM Chris Hipkins.

Verrall commented,ย โ€œThis is a really important thing for making sure our health system functions over winter. It will protect you, and your whanauโ€. What on earth is she talking about and which planet is she from?

Dr. Ian Town, Chief Science Advisor to the Ministry of Health said heย โ€œdid not know exactly how long the new vaccine would protect people forโ€โ€”he is certainly right, it doesnโ€™t last very long and the more you do it the sicker you become. He doesnโ€™t appear to be aware of his own departmentโ€™s research.

In a blunder indicating his ignorance of the latest published research, Dr. Town described myocarditis as caused by long Covid, omitting to mention research that shows thatย Covid vaccines cause way more myocarditis than Covid infection.

Just in case Dr. Town and Minister Verrall have difficulty finding newly published Covid papers discussing the rapidly growing list of adverse effects following Covid vaccination, try these recently published journal papers:

Steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome with collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a 12-year-old Japanese female after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination

The association between COVID-19 vaccination and idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, clinical manifestation and outcomes

Effect of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine on thyroid autoimmunity: A twelve-month follow-up study

Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Postโ€“COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Myocarditis

A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against COVID-19

Emergence of a New Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease: 26 Cases of the Human Version of Mad-Cow Disease, Days After a COVID-19 Injection

The government should also bring themselves up to date with the increased rates of disability payments in the USA, it might be happening here. Considering the myopic devotion to Covid vaccination, I wonder whether anyone is even looking?

In summary, I am stunned at the lack of substance, caution, and humanity in the thinking of our government. Having embarked on a policy of universal Covid vaccination, they appear to be incapable of rationally assessing the impact of their policy and adjusting accordingly. This pushes against all accepted scientific standards and it leaves the public suffering in the dark.

Since an opportunity to publicly air concerns has been denied to those asking questions. Since the media is apparently paid to support the government. Since those who have publicly admitted to remaining unvaccinated are subject to repeated ad hominem attacks. Since government ministers and scientists are not prepared to debate the issues publicly. There is very little that can be said, except to announce an era of unreality.

It is certainly a creepy time to be alive in Godzone, especially if you are over the age of 30. No worries though, if you are under thirty and are feeling you want to spin the roulette wheel of death one more time, the government announced you can ask your GP to write you a prescription for yet another booster.

If you think I am sounding extreme or launching a conspiracy, just thinkโ€”in addition to discussing official New Zealand Covid-19 data, I have referenced above eight scientific papers recently published in learned journals which raise serious concerns about Covid vaccine safety. Do you agree with your governmentโ€™s instruction to get another booster? You shouldnโ€™t. Ask your government and your newspapers to reference real science, rather than spouting political propaganda. They are misleading you with vacuous talk of safety and effectiveness.

Newly Released Figures Demonstrate That mRNA Boosters Have Had a Deadly Impact, Increasing All Cause Mortality

0

Information concerning mortality in 2021, 2022, and 2023 correlated with vaccination status has been released by Te Whata Ora โ€” Health New Zealand following a Freedom of Information (OIA) request (attached). The figures are signed off by Astrid Koornneef, Interim Director of Prevention, National Public Health Service.

The released figures include all New Zealand registered deaths by month. The figures show that for the last six months of 2022, 80% of all people dying in New Zealand had received Pfizer mRNA booster shots. Yet according toย official government figuresย updated 14 February 2023, only 73.2% of those eligible (18+ years) have received a booster.

1.8% of those dying are under 18 years of age and have, therefore, not received a booster. Adjusting for this, recipients of booster shots have at least an 11% increased chance of dying in 2022 compared to all other groups, including the double vaccinated, partially vaccinated, and unvaccinated. This equates to 3,040 additional 2022 deaths among the boosted when compared to other groups.

According to the Official Information Act Request, 39,313 persons died in 2022. These are the latest figures which may be subject to increase as the process of compiling 2022 death totals continues. The total number of deaths in 2019 (before the pandemic) was 34,260. The 2022 interim total is an increase of 15% or 5,053 deaths (compared to the pre-pandemic 2019 total).

An article in the NZ Herald erroneously claims that this spike in deaths is due to the effect of Covid 19 on an ageing population. This is not supported by data. According to the Government Covid portal a total of only 1,599 people have died with Covid described as the official cause of death, most of which occurred in 2022. This is insufficient to account for 5,053 extra deaths in 2022.

Moreover, the article completely fails to take account of the fact that the extra deaths are disproportionately occurring among people of all ages who have received booster shots. This would not be happening if increased deaths were a result of a knock on effect of Covid or an effect due to ageing. In either case, death rates would be equally shared among the various vaccination status groups, they are not. From a statistical point of view, nothing could be any clearerโ€”booster shots increase your chance of death from any cause.

Corroborating data is available from the UK, which we covered inย our February 13 release. An analysis of 300 UK administrative districts shows that those with boosters have a progressively increasing risk of death in the months following their shot. Further UK information indicates elevated incidence of heart disease and liver disease are factors.

The latest OIA figures show that the continued insistence in mainstream media that New Zealand has benefitted from a net reduced death rate due to Government pandemic policy is untenable. The policy of encouraging booster shots should cease immediately. Further investigation into figures of hospital admissions and deaths by category should be undertaken urgently. This will shed light on the mechanisms whereby Covid boosters are causing excess deaths.

Our Politicians Believe They Can Do No Wrong

0

The pandemic has brought out the best and the worst in people. In order to understand what is going on, we need to refer to history. When dictators empower supporters to persecute, oppress, and blame a segment of the population, things rapidly go from bad to worse as the inflamed followers seek to outdo each other in extreme actions. Once the privileged group is allowed to openly hold outlandish opinions and act upon them without censure or restraint, things rapidly get out of hand. Traditional values of justice, morality, and kindness are readily abandoned.

In 1938 Hitler annexed Austria. The persecution unleashed on the Austrian Jews, horrified even the Jewish population of Germany, who had suffered much as a result of increasingly restrictive legislation during the previous five years. The details are too horrifying to repeat here, but the principle is instructive. Hitler came to be revered as a God-like figure, in whose service extremes of behaviour could be freely ventured in his name.

A professor at Yale University has sparked outrageย by suggesting the only way to deal with Japan’s rapidly aging population is a mass suicide or disembowelment. Yusuke Narita, an assistant professor of economics at Yale, defended his views in a New York Times profile last weekend after he made the remarks on a streaming news program in 2021. Naritaโ€™s ideas resurrect the โ€œuseless eatersโ€ argument advanced by the Nazi state in support of enforced euthanasia. What is remarkable is the fact that he is still a professor at Yale. This gives you insight into the prevalence and acceptability of horrific views, including even mass murder.

The New York Postย reportsย that a woman in Victoria, Australia has been denied a needed heart transplant because she is unvaccinated. The woman has a valid vaccine exemption because vaccination may worsen her heart condition, but the attending physicians have decided that the procedure is tooย โ€˜sacredโ€™ย to allow an unvaccinated person to participate. I am sure you know that the opposite of sacred isย โ€˜profaneโ€™. According to the dictionary: profane persons are not respectful of religious sentiments. So according to the Victorian Department of Health, the unvaccinated are, by definition, irreligious.

Apparently, Covid vaccination has been elevated to the status of a religion in the minds of some extremists. Adherents of this rather strange religion are granted great leeway to ignore counter arguments and factual evidence. Thus the CDC received multiple alerts from concerned doctors and hospitals about elevated incidence of cardiac events following vaccination early in 2021. Seeย hereย for a range of examples, but even after the alerting emails had been received, the vaccine safety work group for CDC’s advisory panel said:

There are “relatively few reports of myocarditis” after vaccination and that “most cases appear to be mild.โ€ A deliberate attempt to misdirect growing concern.

The CDC eventually had to admit there was a serious problem with myocarditis post Covid vaccination but faced with reports of increased incidence of stroke following Covid vaccination, it has decided to embark on a similar cover up.

Joseph A. Ladapo, Surgeon General of Florida reports that the CDC has said that signals of stroke risk with mRNA vaccination shouldnโ€™t be taken seriously since other countries havenโ€™tย โ€œflagged this safety issue.โ€ย In fact, they have, as Lapado explainsย here,ย ignored high stroke rates in Sweden.

In Florida, they are putting data before dogma. In the UK the NHS has now flagged thatย it may close the Covid vaccination for all ages and even for so called โ€˜at riskโ€™ groups.ย Lapado summarises:

โ€œAt this point in the pandemic, it’s likely that these mRNA COVID shots cause more harm than good in most Americans.โ€

Here in New Zealand, you may not know all this, you need to. mRNA Covid vaccines are killers. Follow Steve Kirsch hashing out key points of evidenceย here. Increasingly governments are recognising this. You can bet your bottom dollar that our government and the opposition know this (by now it is hard not to realise what is going on), but they are keeping quiet.

The sad truth: Ardern, Hipkins, and Verral opened the floodgates on extreme views. The majority of the population believed them, and now the government canโ€™t do a u-turn without embarrassment and consequent relegation to the political wilderness. It canโ€™t be very long before it all comes out though.

It is hard to imagine why anyone would think it morally acceptable to keep quiet about the cause of unprecedented excess deaths in New Zealand. As PM Hipkins gravely shares his devastation and concern with us on TV about cyclone deaths, he is keeping mum about a tragedy on a scale which dwarfs cyclone Gabrielle.

He is allowed to do that because he is a member of a group of fanatical modernists who have come to treat medical misadventure and consequent death as the price of progress. We are talking about sacred ground here. Thou shalt not say vaccination is wrong, it is always right, no matter how ineffective, painful, or fatal.

The Labour party is not alone. Chris Luxon believes that mRNA vaccines can do no wrong and canโ€™t give a straight answer to concerns raised at hustings. James Shaw is all for modern technology, including the biotechnology of vaccines. David Seymour wishes that our population would make more use of the relaxed euthanasia laws. Rawiri Waititi wants us to thank the indigenous Hawaiians for killing James Cook rather than celebrate Valentineโ€™s Day.

None of these politicians have any more than a superficial knowledge about biotechnology, probably based on biased briefings handed to them as they rush off to meetings, BUT they hold strong views and expect you and I will follow their lead without question. There is a sense of unreality in Parliament as politicians go round and round the Beehive swapping extreme views and egging each other on. Time to get out the history books and brush up on where and what all this can lead to.

The Madness of Ignoring Newly Published Papers on Covid Vaccine Outcomes

0

Every day, my attention is drawn to efforts to extend the reach of mRNA vaccines. For example, nightly news anchor Mark Steyn of GB News has just been removed to make way with a pro-vaccine, pro-lockdown advocate. Mark was famously asking hard questions about vaccine safety. The CDC and the NHS have included mRNA Covid vaccines in the advised regular schedule of childhood vaccinationย freeing the providers from any legal liability forever.

I can understand it if people feel depressed by these and other trends. Following three years of misleading official pandemic advice fueled by carefully placed PR (paid for by commercial pharmaceutical interests and governments), people who are vaccinated feel different and want to keep separate from the unvaccinated. Many believe the unvaccinated are deserving of censure, segregation, and even punishment.

The US Federal government is actually tracking people who are unvaccinated (for any reason other than a medically approved exemption). In other words, the unvaccinated are subject to surveillance and listed as obstinate (or dare I say itโ€”asocial).

This is not a random piece of Federal record-keeping. A paper โ€œEstimating the risk reduction of isolation on COVID-19 nonhousehold transmission and severe/critical illness in nonimmune individuals: September to November 2021โ€ published 8 February 2023 seeks to estimate how many โ€˜nonimmuneโ€™ individuals need to be isolated from society to stop the spread of infectious disease. The results of this paper are obscure even to a careful reader, but the intent is obviousโ€”the authors set out to calculate out just how many unvaccinated individuals you need to lock up and for how long to prevent the spread of a disease.

Analysis of Recently Published Research

These sorts of actions and imaginings are completely out of touch with careful analysis of pandemic data genuinely seeking to scientifically work out what happened during the last three years rather than merely pushing the biotech vaccine agenda. A petition presented to the UK Government entitled โ€œInvestigate UK excess deaths not related to Covid.โ€ received a response last week. The government reply included the following:

โ€œAnalysis shows that, in England, for the week ending 28 October 2022, the leading causes of death contributing to the excess were deaths involving cardiovascular diseases; the highest levels of excess mortality were for deaths involving heart failure (21% higher than expected), and ischaemic heart diseases (17% higher than expected). Deaths involving acute respiratory infections were 16% higher than expected. You can view OHIDโ€™s (Office for Health Improvement and Disparities) excess mortality tool here.

Estimates show that for deaths registered in England during the whole of 2022, deaths involving four conditions were all over 10% higher than expected: heart failure (15% higher), cirrhosis and other liver diseases (14%), diabetes (12%) and ischaemic heart diseases (11%).โ€

There was no mention of vaccination at all, even though it is a very obvious causal candidate, one that has been widely discussed even in the media. The Daily Sceptic (a publication of the UK Free Speech Union) filled in this lamentable oversight with an article โ€œHigher Excess Deaths Clearly Linked to Higher Vaccination Rates in England, New Analysis Shows“. The article found:

โ€œThe more vaccine doses an area of England has received, the greater the number of excess deaths it has experienced, an analysis of official data has found โ€“ adding to worries that the novel Covid vaccines are contributing to the sharp rise in excess deaths seen since mid-2021.โ€

The analysis of 300 UK administrative areas found that the more jabs people received and the more time that had elapsed the relationship between high vaccination rates and death became stronger. What are people dying from: The UK government figures suggest heart disease, liver disease, and diabetes were especially at fault. It is just a short step to conclude mRNA vaccination might be causal, after all myo/pericarditis is a known side effect.

These high risks of vaccination are firmly underlined by a preprint paper analysing the spread of risk of death by age entitled โ€œAge-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia“. This paper found the risk of death following vaccination doubled for every 5.2 years increase in age. In other words, contrary to the policy of prioritising the vaccination of those over 65, those in this age bracket actually suffered an increased risk of death following vaccination.

So what stops governments from investigating the fundamental cause of excess deaths and what drives them to continue to promote vaccination? What leads them to ignore the growing weight of published evidence?

It is hard to fathom, unless you accept that people have been strongly schooled to a degree of bias. You might also begin to wonder if mRNA vaccines are affecting cognitive ability. Is this also in play? In fact, cognitive decline is a well known side effect of heart disease. A 2016 paper in the journal Cardiac Failure Review โ€œCognitive Decline in Heart Failure: More Attention is Neededโ€ reports:

โ€œHeart failure adversely affects various cognitive domains, including attention, learning ability and working memory, executive functions, and information processing speedโ€

Recently published papers from Taiwan and Thailand indicate that cardiac dysfunction is far more common subsequent to mRNA vaccination than previously realised. It can affect a high percentage of vaccine recipients. A significant number of people may be suffering from degrees of cardiac damage. Could this be affecting cognitive ability to a measurable degree? We have discussed this before at the Hatchard Report here and here. It is worth more research.

Biotech Advocates are Seeking to Reject Nature

Whether this is the case or not, there is a more general philosophy associated with the push for normalisation of biotech interventions. We have written about this in our article โ€œGenetic Essentialism and Biotechnology Experimentation“. This involves an increasing rejection of natural law and those advocating more natural lifestyles, along with the suggestion that governments can and should demand uniformity and compliance with modern medicine and all that that implies.

The Therapeutic Products Bill (TPB) was recently introduced into Parliament where it passed its first reading virtually without dissent. The Bill will smooth the way for new biotechnology products in medicine and food, but proposes high hurdles for natural products and traditional medicines that will inevitably discourage their use.

The TPB goes against provisions of the NZ Bill of Rights which contains articles guaranteeing freedom of medical choice. Personal choice of treatment is a complex process as anyone who has been seriously ill will be aware. This involves weighing options from a science perspective, taking dietary advice, subjectively assessing your own condition, consulting with family, and reviewing traditional medical interventions.

In my experience, you never know in advance exactly what will help or hinder your condition. In many cases, assessment of cancer treatments for example demonstrate that no single treatment options are clear winners. Decisions about whether to accept chemotherapy or not often come down to weighing evenly balanced outcomes from different modalities and interventions. Some of these options are entirely natural.

The right to go through this personal process of choice should not be taken away from anyone. The pandemic has shown us that forcing compliance with a single approach can rapidly turn into a public health catastrophe when that procedure later turns out to be ineffective, risky, and even in some cases fatal. As far as natural health options, the TPB will appoint a regulator who can and almost certainly will take away many options from the reach of individuals.

This is part and parcel of the denial of consciousness that constitutes the mechanistic view of life. Individuals make a myriad of decisions everyday. We have five senses, our mind, an intellect which chooses, and a sense of self or identity. We interact with the world via personal experience, behaviour, rational thought and reflection, traditional and learnt knowledge, and personal preference. Placing these health choices in the hands of a government regulator does not make any sense unless you are the type of psychopathic politician who seeks obedience as the desired outcome of governance.

The pandemic should have taught us that limiting diversity and locking down individual and collective behaviour is disastrous, not the least because once behaviour is forcibly stopped, it is hard to bring it back to life. New Zealand destroyed its tourist industry by locking down borders. It has proved very hard to resuscitate. Once you have strictly schooled the population to vaccinate, mask up, reject social contact, and abhor the unvaccinated, you have created a degree prejudicial behaviour. One that is hard to shift, even if these methods have been proven ineffective.

The laws of psychology are such that once attitudes are repeatedly reinforced and made routine they often become inflexible prejudice. This has happened during the pandemic to an unprecedented degree. Whether this is sufficient to explain the polarisation of society and the rejection of newly published science papers indicating dangers of mRNA vaccination remains to be seen.

Legislative attempts in the TPB to restrict natural health options, promote risky biotech experimentation, and approve synthetic foods without adequate testing should be opposed. If we wish to be able to continue to freely choose herbal medicines and supplements without government interference, we will need to speak up. Go to this link to make a submission before March 5th (the deadline has been extended). Write to your MP and complain that the appointment of a regulator amounts to an open ended blank cheque to control the use of products used by more than 50% of our population without fully specifying the principles he should use.

In fact, we need to speak up more and more from this point in time moving forward. Research confirming our worst fears about mRNA vaccine dangers has been published. Any attempt to continue to suppress this information has the depressing smell of psychopathy. We should not be daunted by this task. Remaining silent at this point amounts to compliance and complicity. I am greatly heartened that we are not letting this go in New Zealand. The situation needs to be addressed openly and completely. The truth about the lack of mRNA vaccine safety and biotechnology in general is not going away nor can it remain hidden. It has to be thoroughly and openly faced. Otherwise, as time unfolds, those involved may feel emboldened to launch future public health deceptions on an uninformed public as a matter of routine.


Guy Hatchard, Ph.D.,ย was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID,ย a food testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Guy is the author ofย Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness.

In this groundbreaking book, Dr. Guy Hatchard takes a fresh look at the 4.5 billion years of evolution on planet earth.

In everyday language, he explains the findings of the leading edge of quantum cosmology, evolutionary biology, nutrition, and epigenetics then puts these next to the ancient health system of Ayurveda.

The implications for our diet, digestion, and health care are startling.

Tactile version

For those who appreciate the tactile experience of holding a book in hand, Your DNA Diet is available in large A4 format, glossy cover, containing 268 pages, 65 diagrams, charts, and illustrations, many in full colour.

Price NZ$50.00, including postage (New Zealand only).
To order, email your.dna.diet@hatchardreport.com, and we will reply with how to complete the sale.

Electronic version

Available now on Amazon as a Kindle eBook,ย Your DNA Diet
Donโ€™t have Kindle, no worries; download theย free Kindle App

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

The New Zealand Press Leads the Way to Nowhere

0

An article in the Herald today rated New Zealand as the best place on the planet to survive an apocalypse. Given the standard of press coverage here, we might not even hear about it if it did happen.

Yesterday, the Herald’s Social Issues reporter, Isaac Davison,ย reviewedย a paper (UPDATE: This paper has been removed from SSRN at the request of the author, SSRN, or the rights holder)ย published in the prestigious journal The Lancet authored by the Ministry of Health.

The paper found a huge increase in Acute Kidney Injury among four million Kiwis in the twenty one days following mRNA vaccination. I scanned Isaacโ€™s article in vain for a mention of kidney injury. Like me, Isaac wears glasses; he might need a new prescription. He describes himself in the following terms:

โ€œWe are your advocate, Aotearoa. Uncovering stories that matter, asking hard-hitting questions of those in power, โ€ฆ.providing Premium expert opinion and analysis. Bringing you distinctive, quality journalism and breaking news from across New Zealand and around the world. With specialists working together to create in-depth reads, engaging video, and unmissable podcasts.โ€

Isaac may be better off in comedy, he certainly raised a good laugh here at the Hatchard Report. His article quoted some โ€˜expertsโ€™ who could join him on the stand up circuit.

Dr. Tim Hanlon from Te Whata Oraโ€™s (our national health service) National Immunisation Programme was quoted as saying:

โ€œThese findings provide further reassurance on the safety profile of the vaccine, particularly from a New Zealand-specific context,โ€ฆ.Importantly, studies have found that the risk of any of these [adverse events] following infection with SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) is substantially greater than after Covid-19 mRNA vaccination.โ€

My question is: what studies is Hanlon referring to? Looking for definitive studies, I found a paper published in The Journal of Clinical Medicine entitled โ€œThe Incidence of Myocarditis and Pericarditis in Post COVID-19 Unvaccinated Patientsโ€”A Large Population-Based Studyโ€. This large Israeli study of 196,992 unvaccinated subjects found no post Covid-19 infection association with incidence of Peri/Myocarditis. In other words, in the absence of mRNA vaccination, Covid-19 does not induce myo/pericarditis. End of story. The inescapable conclusion: the elevated myo/pericarditis incidence found in New Zealand is due to mRNA vaccination and nothing else.

Associate Professor Helen Petousis-Harris, a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland, who has been a consultant for Pfizer (???), was also quoted in the article, she said:

โ€œThe research paper picked up a known safety issue with the vaccine – myocarditis had been found as a rare side effect in international studiesโ€.

Petousis-Harris warned against reading too much into the research saying: 

โ€œThere are limitations to these kinds of studies. I would be cautious in over-interpreting any of this as we do have a lot of data internationally and it has not found these outcomes [???]. Itโ€™s also clear that the safety profile of this vaccine is very well understood through the culmination of vast amounts of international data [???].โ€

So presumably, no worries then, or should Petousis-Harris be aware of a study completed in Taiwan and published on 28th October 2022 entitled โ€œChanges of ECG parameters after BNT162b2 vaccine in the senior high school studentsโ€. This found 763 students (17.1%) had at least one cardiac symptom after the second vaccine dose, mostly chest pain and palpitations. 51 (1%) had abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) results. While 1/985 school children were diagnosed with myocarditis or clinically significant arrhythmias post 2nd dose of the mRNA Pfizer vaccine. These results were commensurate with the results of a prospectiveย Thai studyย of 300 high school students.

We have 815,000 school children in New Zealand. If the Taiwan study is to be relied on (it should be), it is likely that 8,150 would have recorded an abnormal ECG and 827 a clinical cardiac problem (if only they had been tested).

Petousis-Harris knowledgeably (???) warned us against reading too much into this; after all, they are only young school children who will get better, right? Think again. A recent case report recorded a 17 year old male with vaccine induced myocarditis who suffered from ventricular tachycardia during exercise even after 6-7 monthsโ€”a risk factor for a heart attack.

Professor Peter McIntyre, an epidemiologist at the University of Otago, was quoted โ€œthe vaccineโ€™s link with myocarditis was picked up and communicated very early in New Zealand.โ€ Was it? The Ministry of Health did not send out a warning to DHBs (not to the public) about Myocarditis incidence until mid December 2021, a full six months after they first knew about it. Is that โ€˜very earlyโ€™ in Ministry of Health speak? Following this date, the public were still being subjected to saturation government advertising saying mRNA vaccination was completely โ€˜safe and effectiveโ€™.

Professor McIntyre deserves some credit though. He says 

โ€œwe may need to start moving away from everything for everyoneโ€. Translation: he knows it is not helpful for school children and most other people, if not all people.

Medsafe was quoted

โ€œUp to August, there had been 500 spontaneous [???] reports of myocarditis, pericarditis or myopericarditis within 30 days of vaccination. These reports do not necessarily have a causal relationship with administration of [the vaccine] and may represent coincidental events.โ€

Well, thank goodness for that. Without this helpful advice, I could have been very worried about this article yesterday by Newshub โ€œWellington and Hutt Hospital emergency departments seeing unusually high demandโ€. The article reports, โ€œThe reason for the spike was not clear.โ€ Now correct me if I am wrong, but wouldnโ€™t it normally be the job of the hospital to know why and the job of a reporter to ask why? It couldnโ€™t be due to high rates of cardiac injury and acute kidney disease could it? I do hope that if there is a nuclear war we hear about it in safe little New Zealand.

The Long Read: Suppression of Information and Investigation in New Zealand is Still Continuing

0

How Did This Happen and What Should Be Done?

One of the most effective ways to repress occupied populations is to cut out sources of information and remove the possibility of investigation. When reprisals against resistors caused public outrage in 1941, Hitler devised the Nacht und Nebel (Night and Fog) policy. Henceforth the fate of captured resistors, whether they were dead or alive, would be withheld from their dear ones and the public, who, living in dread, did not know whether to protest or hope. Inevitably, news of their cruel fate eventually leaked out.

Here is a personal family story of cardiac vaccine injury from the USA. You may have read similar stories, especially if you have searched for them. I am concerned here to point out the similarities and differences between the approach of the US medical services in this case and those here in New Zealand.

Emilyโ€™s sister, Jordan (age 26), reported to her GP with tachycardia (very fast heart rate) after her first J&J jab. Jordan was rapidly transferred to hospital for assessment. Later Emilyโ€™s child, Aiden (age 14), reported to hospital with chest pains after his second Pfizer jab. At hospital both were extensively tested.

The doctors ordered an echocardiogram (ultrasound of the heart) for Jordan and saw a pericardial effusion (fluid around the heat). It progressed, and she then was diagnosed with pericarditis (inflammation of the saclike membrane surrounding the heart) due to the J&J vaccine. The doctors issued Jordan with an exemption from further Covid vaccination.

Aidenโ€™s assessment by emergency department doctors revealed abnormal ECG (test measuring electrical signals of heart), and elevated troponin (an enzyme suggesting heart damage). At that point, Aiden was diagnosed with โ€œvaccine induced myocarditisโ€.

It is now a year since these incidents. Emily reports she is incredibly thankful for their medical care staff, the actions of Aidenโ€™s cardiologist and other specialists, and the ongoing care through the year-long road to recovery. She has not received any compensation. Emily publicised their story, she reports:

โ€œI truly expected some compassion and empathy, instead I was met with labels, accusations and blocks. Iโ€™m sad to say the bulk of it has come from the Twitter medical community. I find it beyond hypocritical to support a vaccine and deny the existence of the vaccine-injured, especially with clear causation.โ€

The vaccine-injured here in New Zealand will empathise about the abuse and the lack of compensation, but will look with envy at the rapid issue of vaccine exemptions and the outstanding level of medical care and support.

The New Zealand Government Deliberately Hid Information About Vaccine Safety

Early on, our government appeared to decide to ignore the safety recommendations of Pfizer itself. Pfizer was advising that vaccine exemptions be granted to anyone with injuries subsequent to inoculation or with a health history of allergic reactions or adverse responses to other vaccines. Our government began by refusing almost all applications for vaccine exemption from people in these categories.

Simultaneously the government publicly maintained that mRNA vaccines were entirely โ€˜safe and effectiveโ€™. GPs who told patients of risks and advised caution put themselves at risk of public censure and even expulsion from the medical profession. Some were actually struck off.

Our Ministry of Health delayed warning District Health Boards of the risk of myocarditis until mid December 2021 (nine months after the start of the vaccine rollout in late February 2021 and at least six months after they were first made aware of the problem). This Ministry of Health warning incorrectly described vaccine induced myocarditis as rare and generally mild.

As a result, there was an obvious incentive right from the start of the vaccine rollout for GPs and medical staff at hospitals to ignore alarming cardiac symptoms and fail to order necessary investigative tests. Instead blaming it on anxiety and sending patients home with ibuprofen.

As of November 2022, there have been 13,000 cases of chest pain and 7,500 cases of shortness of breath (both known symptoms of myocarditis) reported to CARM (Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring) in Dunedin. Reporting is voluntary, and Medsafe itself estimates that only 5% of reactions are reported. Medsafe has still not acknowledged a connection between these reported reactions and mRNA Covid vaccination (except in a very small number of cases of myocarditis).

The reports include 184 deaths. As of November 2022 only two of these deaths have been acknowledged as connected to myocarditis due to vaccination. The rest have been vaguely labelled as โ€˜unlikelyโ€™ to be connected to vaccination.

Up to December 2022, the Accident Compensation Commission (ACC) has received 3,326 claims for vaccine injury. 40% (1,349) of these have been accepted, and 60% have been rejected. To make an application for compensation you must have the support of your doctor and other relevant specialists (doctor reluctance to become involved is the main reason why so few affected people have been able to lodge ACC claims). Only 152 of the accepted claims are for cardiac injury; among the rest, approximately 450 (1/3) appear to be due to accidental injury sustained as a result of errors in the actual process of administering the vaccine.

Our government has resolutely maintained a level of controlled silence about the fate of those seriously affected by vaccination. Credible reports circulating privately indicate the Ministry of Health went to great lengths to erroneously assure parents of children and teenagers who died suddenly following vaccination that these events could not possibly be related to the vaccine. These extreme efforts at suppression were undoubtedly aimed at reducing vaccine hesitancy among the young and possibly silencing parental concerns. Yet studies published by mid 2021 indicated that young people were especially vulnerable to vaccine induced cardiac injury. Early figures which have since become highly verified by more research.

The German policy of Nacht und Nebel in occupied France came to an end in late 1943 when an official in Auschwitz accidentally sent a death notice to the family of a French woman detained for her activities in the resistance. The French national conscience was awakened and outraged. Demands were issued to know the fate of thousands of detainees. In fact, the vast majority of those held under Nacht und Nebel had perished. Knowing that they were going to lose the war and perhaps worried about retribution, German authorities relented, improving French prisoner conditions and allowing parcels to be sent and letters exchanged with the surviving prisoners (this did not happen for imprisoned Jews, Gypsies, and Russians).

The extremely low figures for vaccine injury admitted so far in New Zealand are in stark contrast to those reported in a preprintย paperย published two weeks ago in the Lancet by the New Zealand Ministry of Health. This found statistically significant rates of myocarditis and acute kidney injury (AKI) due to mRNA vaccination. There were 1778 extra kidney injuries involving hospitalisation and 229 extra cases of myo/pericarditis involving hospitalisation within 21 days of receiving a shot. That is a startling injury rate of approximately 1 in every 2000 vaccine recipients.

Up to this point, the Ministry of Health has only admitted injury rates of 3 in every 100,000 vaccine recipients. Accordingly, the study points to a rate of injury 16 times higher than previously acknowledged, but that only covers injuries involving hospitalisations within 21 days of the jab. Injuries emerging over a longer term remain uninvestigated by the Ministry of Health. Nor does the study take account of the effect of a presumption of safety on the hospitalisation rates and the lack of routine testing for cardiac injury.

How Did the Government Manipulate Public Information?

Until now, many have believed that New Zealand rates of vaccine injury are low and not cause for too much alarm. In fact, Medsafe Safety Reports now appear to be entirely misleading. From the start, the New Zealand government and its medical service instituted a strict policy to suppress information about the extent and nature of vaccine injury whilst simultaneously coercing universal Covid vaccination compliance. How did they do that? Through government messaging, which:

  • Repeatedly rated the Pfizer vaccine completely โ€˜safe and effectiveโ€™.
  • Assured the public Covid vaccines would prevent transmission, infection, and serious illness
  • Strongly discouraged doctors from issuing vaccine exemptions.
  • Threatened GPs advising patients to be cautious, with disbarment
  • Mandated government employees to vaccinate or face dismissal
  • Strongly encouraged private companies to mandate employees
  • Failed to advise GPs of any known adverse effects of Covid vaccination
  • Labelled the unvaccinated a danger to public health and source of disinformationโ€”equating it with terrorism.
  • Estimated (incorrectly) that the Pfizer vaccine would prevent tens of thousands of otherwise inevitable deaths

The net effect on public health was to create the impression among doctors, health professionals, and the general public that;

  • Almost all health complaints following vaccination were unrelated or imaginary.
  • Consequently, any adverse effects were likely due to anxiety and would dissipate quickly without investigation or special treatment.
  • Any reports by doctors of vaccination injury might create a black mark against their record.
  • The Pfizer mRNA vaccine was not experimental and had been fully tested over a long period.
  • Any spread of Covid in the general population should be regarded as facilitated by unvaccinated persons.

The government also spent big on media support for a pro-vaccine stance, paid very generous per person fees to GPs administering vaccines, and rewarded organisations and individuals bringing people into vaccination centres. We now know the government also ignored safety concerns raised by CVTAG (Covid Vaccine Technical Advisory Group).

So why did they adopt this extreme position and ignore early warning signs of high rates of vaccine injury? The alarming Pfizer post-marketing vaccine assessment was completed and distributed by Pfizer at the end of April 2021 to governments with whom they had contractual arrangements. We presume this includes New Zealand.

The Public Heard Nothing About It. Why?

We can only speculate. Early in the pandemic, PM Jacinda Ardern described daily discussions over breakfast with former PM Helen Clark. On 9 July 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) appointed Clark as co-chair of a panel reviewing the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response of governments to the outbreak.

Throughout 2021, Clark was a high profile proponent of universal Covid vaccination. As late as September 2021, Clark was strongly advising the NZ public that the Covid vaccines were completely safe and universally effective.

Ardern met Bill and Melinda Gates during a trip to New York in 2019. In November 2020, Melinda Gates furthered the association making an impassioned plea to Ardern to support Covid vaccination. The pair teleconferenced. Gates said, โ€œthe US, and the world, saw New Zealand’s response and PM Ardern’s leadership as an exemplar.โ€ Ardern replied, โ€œI am happy to assistโ€.

Was the extreme position on vaccination taken by Ardern and her government a response to Gatesโ€™ request that New Zealand become an exemplar? Were there incentives to do so? Or was the kudos enough to push Ardern towards the worldโ€™s most coercive mandates? Was this the reason for withholding information about vaccine injury from the public?

Whilst Ardern became the global poster child of universal vaccination and extreme lockdowns, she didnโ€™t do it alone. All the opposition parties, in awe of Ardernโ€™s poll support and the high rates of vaccination, joined in with calls for more extreme measures, including Chris Luxon, leader of the National Party, and James Shaw, leader of the Greens. Director General of Health Dr. (now Sir) Ashley Bloomfield personally made it his business to refuse vaccine exemptions in most cases. In fact, the few exemptions granted were only postponements. Covid response minister Chris Hipkins (now NZ PM) exceeded Ardernโ€™s doctrines (the two tier society and the one source of truth) with his own threat to hunt down the unvaccinated. No one from Parliament met the protestors who were demanding transparency, instead turning the hoses on them and calling in riot police to disperse an entirely peaceful and lawful protest.

Andrew Little, former Minister of Health, and Dr. Ayesha Verrall, current Minister of Health and Minister for Covid Response, have both failed to institute investigation into unprecedented rates of excess all cause mortality (rates which are still continuing). With the data available to them, it would have been very easy to settle any controversy by comparing excess deaths with vaccination status. They were requested to do so on many occasions, but nothing has been done.

We thought we had a culture of openness and transparency in New Zealand, but the government has reversed this. Now is the time to speak up and demand it be restored. Almost 90% of the population got vaccinated in good faith or were coerced by mandates; they mostly remain in ignorance of the injury they risked and, in many cases, suffered. Many believe erroneously that the government was following international Covid science publishing, they werenโ€™t. They were pursuing a political agenda and ignoring growing international evidence of the negative impact on public health.

Withholding information and failing to investigate are policies of repressive regimes. The government has failed to publicise the results of the latest Ministry of Health investigation of adverse effects of mRNA Covid vaccination in New Zealand. The responsibility to do so now falls squarely on the shoulders of our recently appointed Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins. For three years, he has been closely associated with Covid policy. So far, he has maintained a stiff silence. That is not sufficient to put things right. It does not do justice to those injured or to accepted standards of public health. This has become a defining issue of the modern era. Silence will not draw New Zealand together again as a nation.

Support Us

The Hatchard Report receives no independent funding; our team is all volunteers. We depend on our readers to help us cover these expenses.

If you are not already, can you help support us with a small monthly contribution or one-off donation today?

Dragging Mainstream Media Back to the Real World Step by Step

0

Yesterday the NZ Herald, our most read legacy media newspaper, published an article, โ€œAustralian woman reveals heartbreak as โ€˜lovingโ€™ husband sucked into conspiraciesโ€. The article purported to tell the story of an anonymous woman in Western Australia whose โ€˜gentle, kind loving husbandโ€™ had fallen into an โ€˜antivaxxer conspiracy cultโ€™.

According to the woman, her hapless husband erroneously believed the vaccine was experimental since no long term studies had been completed. He asserted that it did not provide immunity from infection or prevent transmission. He also warned of adverse effects which might result in death.

The woman professed to love her husband dearly and mentioned his high IQ, but referred to him as a โ€˜freedumb fighterโ€™ whose stance on mRNA vaccine safety amounted to โ€˜domestic abuseโ€™.

The article drew on the expertise of Kim Cullen, who I found has a masterโ€™s degree (not a doctorate) in organisational psychology (not a clinical qualification). She described a range of possible sources for the husbandโ€™s opinions, including a personality disorder, feelings of vulnerability and isolation, pride and superiority, asserting control, the internet, and, crucially the need to cling to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassment.

At this point in the pandemic, I think you must be aware that mRNA does not stop Covid transmission, infection, or indeed reinfection, so you may be harbouring secret feelings of sympathy for some of these views. You might also be wondering if it is the NZ Herald editorial staff who are โ€œclinging to unfounded false beliefs to avoid embarrassmentโ€. Why on earth did the Herald print this appalling article?

Association Between Pfizer mRNA Vaccination and Both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury

A few days ago, Ministry of Health researchers secured publication of their preprint paper in the Lancet, โ€œAdverse Events Following the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNtech) in Aotearoa New Zealandโ€.

The paper reveals there is a statistically significant association between Pfizer mRNA vaccination and both Myocarditis and Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). Here in little New Zealand, you wouldnโ€™t know AKI was a potential side effect of mRNA vaccination. The Herald has not covered it. Instead, choosing to print the dreadful tripe above.

Many Kiwiโ€™s are no longer able to follow the Herald uncritically because it doesnโ€™t fit with reality on the ground. We are living in a country with an unprecedented high rate of excess all-cause mortality and an overwhelmed health service. I now have four vaccinated friends who have developed debilitating kidney disease since the shot, but if you want to read more about the NZ study, you will need to read about it in the British press.

The Ministry of Health study only looked at mRNA vaccine outcomes for 21 days after the shot, validating the husbandโ€™s pointโ€”the long term outcomes remain unassessed. Or are they really unknown? Read this substack article assessing the evidence for longer term serious myocarditis outcomes following mRNA vaccination.

Nor are long term outcomes unknown to the relatives of those adversely affected by mRNA vaccines (there are tens of thousands affected in New Zealand), but they would be unknown to those relying exclusively upon the NZ Herald. They would naturally still believe against all up-to-date published evidence that the vaccine is protecting them from serious illness and death (it isnโ€™t).

The New Zealand Ministry of Health Has Started to Come Clean, but MSN Hasnโ€™t

So the New Zealand Ministry of Health has started to come clean, but MSM hasnโ€™t. Why? We donโ€™t really know. We are left with speculation. Do sources of advertising revenue come with conditions attached? Does the media have signed agreements with the government that preclude coverage that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, possibly conditions of generous government subsidies?

If that is the case, it is undermining our Kiwi culture, which is one of trust. For a long time, there has been an assumption of honesty. In 2021 New Zealand retained the top ranking as the worldโ€™s least corrupt nation. The Hon. Kris Faafoi, Minister of Justice, commented:

โ€œNew Zealand has a well-deserved reputation for being relatively free of corruption, with a high level of public trust in government built on a foundation of transparency.โ€

At that time in January 2022, Faafoi thought the government pandemic response would send New Zealand into the stratosphere of anti-corruption scores, but by mid year, much like Ardern, he decided to exit parliament to โ€œspend more time with his familyโ€ and by some lucky chance almost immediately landed a job as head of a lobbying and PR firm.

Our Culture of Transparency Has Been Eroded During the Pandemic

The government used the historical record of Kiwi trust as a cover for their absolute rejection of concerns about mRNA vaccine safety. As it has turned out, transparency would have served us well. Instead, we have been subjected to a โ€˜safe and effectiveโ€™ media narrative for two years, paid for through government grants and reinforced with unfounded attacks against counter narratives funded directly by the Prime Ministerโ€™s office.

We have learned a lot about society during the pandemic. The glue of public trust is truth and transparency. Without it, we are left with the fog of uncertainty and fear of the unknown. This equates with elevated levels of individual and social stress well known to be associated with negative social outcomes, including crime, low educational achievement, family violence, economic under performance, and high rates of illness.

Despite having the data to do so, the Ministry of Health has not undertaken any investigation to determine if there is any correlation between all cause deaths and vaccine status over the longer term. This simple procedure would settle any controversy. It hasnโ€™t happened. We are being kept in the dark. Requests put to the Minister of Health have been met with deafening silence. Why?

Full Disclosure and Transparency Cannot Be Delayed Any Longer

It may seem to politicians and MSM that there would be a downside to admitting inaccuracies, mistakes, or, dare I say, โ€˜fault,โ€™ but it will eventually all come out. It already is. The UK has abandoned mRNA vaccination for the under 50s, as have a number of other countries. A growing number of senior UK medical specialists are asking questions about hugely elevated rates of heart disease and rapid onset or recurrence of cancers.

There is now not only no point in postponing a reckoning with the emerging scientific picture of a very wide range of long term adverse effects, but there will be a huge downside if it is delayed any longer. In the weird Herald article, the husband clearly had some valid concerns about mRNA vaccines, while the woman was misinformed by MSM. A carefully curated discussion in the media along with some public debates will put everyone back on an even playing field.

The opportunity to undertake cross examination of government witnesses in high court actions has also been so far missing in action. Curiously the courts have deferred to the government for scientific advice. Since when was scientific verity the sole prerogative of government departments?

It is clear that detailed knowledge of the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines would enable GPs and hospital staff to deal appropriately and sympathetically with injury. It would also enable doctors and medical staff to relay factual informed consent to patients. This has not happened so far.

Transparency would also help to heal some family rifts like the one reported so one-sidedly by the Herald. Under the circumstances, the husband should be exonerated for thinking that truth doesnโ€™t count for much when it comes to modern democracy and mainstream news reporting. How many extra sudden deaths are required before the media grows a conscience and starts asking questions? It is time to level up.

Our new Prime Minister, Chris Hipkins, promises he is going to re-evaluate unpopular Labour policies. Is he also going to re-evaluate misleading ones? We hope so. No point in postponing the inevitable. As Shakespeare said, โ€œThe truth will out.โ€