If you poison people indiscriminately, civilization comes to an end

Pride comes before the fall. We are very proud of the technological achievements of our modern civilization, but it has come at a cost to our health. Our planet is becoming more and more littered with damaging pollution in agricultural land, medical practice, ageing cities, the air we breathe, the houses we live in, the seas, and importantly the food we eat.

Modern technology has enabled invasive pollution to reach every corner of the globe. Every technology requires a technologist. Some technologists have difficulty valuing human life over profits. Especially, it seems, biotechnologists who have rewritten the book on pollution by modifying human genetics.

Health services aim to maximise profit

National Health Services in virtually all countries have the face of a lamb but the teeth of a ravenous wolf. Your GP appears to be a kindly dedicated reassuring individual offering you the best methods to get well. Behind him is a sophisticated pharmaceutical economic system designed to maximise profit. This is a system whose priorities have long since begun to lose contact with medical ethics, fundamental principles of health, and patient needs. The pandemic has accelerated the parting of the ways.

Biotechnology is alien technology—technology that is alien to human life. I don’t speak in these terms lightly. Risky biotech interventions are being created through groping steps of experimentation. Not by the cosmic process of natural evolution which has guided human steps through the long corridor of time, but by the guesswork of a few madly arrogant and misguided scientists determined to leave their mark on the human race.

Like drug dealers pressuring potential clients, medical practice has passed beyond choice towards compulsion. The University of California (and others) are mandating that students receive the Moderna bivalent vaccine despite knowing that it has only been tested on eight mice, whilst its predecessor posed serious risks to the cardiac health of the young.

The efforts of the medical system to normalise Covid vaccine injury beggar imagination. Here is a link to a New York hospital advertisement advising very young children they can live with myocarditis and still be successful in the world of fashion. No discussion of its cause and prognosis, merely it’s OK, and according to the NY hospital treatable, yet the prestigious Mayo Clinic website admits myocarditis is not a mild illness.

Misleading PR is what we have come to expect in a modern health system. Just remember the economics of the system prioritise profit, which inevitably means maximising customers. A demand which can only be met if there is more illness.

We learn through success, but if you do make a mistake be sure to correct it

Barring a miracle, it is possibly a vain hope to suggest that those who have asserted their power during the pandemic are going to change direction. They might eventually concede that some mistakes were made, as is clear from this article in the Lancet, but the overall thrust of biotechnology is not being questioned.

An article from the BBC entitled “Could mRNA make us superhuman?” names the biotech direction of medicine a RNAissance which promises the cure of all disease. As if social media popularity is the new yardstick of science, it quotes a Canadian science explainer with 235,000 followers and 3.7 million likes on TikTok:

“A lot of people were sceptical as to whether it could ever work. Now the whole field of mRNA is just exploding. It’s a game changer in medicine…A once-in-a-generation wave of scientific progress.”

According to the article, the list of diseases for which mRNA vaccines are being developed is a very long one. No complaint is too small to mention—lactose intolerance, high cholesterol, cancers, allergies, HIV, zika, herpes, malaria, common bacterial infections, and so on.

Scientist Dr. Dragony Fu envisions that various mRNA vaccines will be mixed together into a single health booster vaccine, which could ward off cancers and viruses at the same time.

The fantasies of biotech gurus extend from ‘vaccines tailored to individuals’ to ‘spraying the whole population from the skies’ to ‘foods cultured by robots in steaming biotech vats’—imagine the convenience.

Also imagine for a moment how many biotechnologists we will need in this future dystopia and how much they will need to be paid, would there be anyone left wise enough to grow ordinary food in soil or even anyone left at all?

When I lived in Iowa, at that time, the staff canteen at the Monsanto HQ served organic food—they know.

The American economy has been ordered to adopt biotechnology.

Last week President Biden issued an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy“.

The aim is to create innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security in a way that maintains United States technological leadership and economic competitiveness.

This paragraph sums up the US government agenda:

“We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers; unlock the power of biological data, including through computing tools and artificial intelligence; and advance the science of scale‑up production while reducing the obstacles for commercialization so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster.”

The detailed executive order mandates nothing less than the reorientation of the entire US economy behind bioengineering. The directors of almost every sector of the economy have been ordered to report back to the President with budgets, initiatives, and progress within 90 to 180 days. They will no doubt be adding the prefix ‘bio’ to their portfolio titles after the style of the White House directive—bioeconomy, bioagriculture and so on.

Consequences of genetic editing cannot be recalled, they persist through generations. As we have seen, mistakes and disasters are inevitable.

The BBC article rates mRNA technology as ‘safer’ than traditional vaccines, an extraordinary claim incompatible with the real world rate of mRNA vaccine adverse effects which is running at 50 times higher than any previous vaccine.

So all cause mortality is at record levels in highly vaccinated countries around the world, but Biden and the BBC are heralding a new renaissance? Longevity has begun to decline. It was happening as far back as 2014 and now it is accelerating, signalling the end of normalcy as we remember it (if it ever deserved the title normal).

It is more like the collective madness of lemmings. We do know that large groups of people, even nations, can rise to frenzies of collective cruelty, but throw in a jab of gene juice and it seems that the world can enjoy destroying itself.

The hype is overwhelming and intoxicating. Well-funded science explainers and recently appointed anti-conspiracy editors have gone into hyperdrive and left any sense of caution behind. MSM outlets including the BBC and even government agencies have colluded with Facebook to ensure that social media support sites are shut down that aim to help those injured by the Covid vaccine or relatives of those who have died.

This gives us an idea about just how determined and brutal our new medically inspired truthsayers and masters can be. If you were rebuked earlier for drawing parallels with the Nazi state or mentioning 1984, you should now be feeling completely vindicated.

The future of medicine in a post-pandemic world

As long as our medical options are controlled by the profit-hungry pharmaceutical wolf, everyone is facing a very bleak and risky future, including those of us with other opinions and alternative medical needs. A future controlled by the giant US economy re-orientated to alter human genetics, our food supply, and earth’s climate.

The oceans are subject to deep sea trawling that is gradually destroying the fish population. No species is left untouched. The only success story has been the creation of marine reserves, areas where no fishing is allowed. To work, these have to be very large areas.

No such option exists with biotech, there are no safe havens. Genetic material is highly mobile and invasive, once released it spreads everywhere and can never be recalled.

It won’t have escaped your notice that whilst biotech medicine has its high profile advocates (many of them well paid for their services), an increasing segment of the population, pushing towards 50%, is very fed up with risky vaccines that don’t actually work. They are voting with their feet, refusing boosters, sheltering their children, and in some cases becoming more vocal.

Medical choice has been politicised during the pandemic. Our political allegiances (left, right, or center) have been cleverly manipulated. Believing that well-lobbied politicians currently running medical systems will be sensible is a vain hope. The pandemic should at least have taught us that.

Our only safe option is to vote for a biotechnology ban. A global political party with a single health issue—ban biotech and de-couple medicine from big pharma. Even 25% support would be a game-changing political force.

I leave you with this sobering thought. Thérèse Coffey, the new UK health secretary has taken her first faltering step to halt the post-pandemic NHS crisis. She has written to civil servants advising them to avoid the Oxford comma at all costs (the Oxford comma is the last comma before the ‘and’ in a list of things. Remember Emperor Nero who fiddled while Rome burned?).

If we want to live in a safe world, we will have to stand up, speak out, and vote with our feet. No one else is going to rise to the occasion for us.

At this point in the Covid pandemic saga, the public is still faced with an information blackout.

The data is very concerning indeed, but no one in parliament or MSM wants to get in front of it. Instead many are still stuck stoking the fear factor. As Prof. Vinay Prasad, an American hematologist-oncologist and health researcher, wrote today: Legitimising irrational anxiety is bad medicine.

Early on in our efforts to publicise the dangers of biotechnology medicine, Guy had an email exchange with Jesse Mulligan, popular commentator with RNZ Afternoons. Jesse’s perspective on Covid vaccination was as follows:

Dec 6th 2021 “I feel like anybody aiming to critique such an obviously positive public health measure should begin and end their messaging reminding people that any risks/flaws in the vaccine are minor compared to the horrific impacts of getting Covid….I don’t have the time to correspond with you on this at length but, for what it’s worth, if you’re putting people off getting a largely safe vaccine by what you’re writing about it, I think you need to review how you approach writing these messages.”

Dec 7th 2021 “It’s not your caution I object to but the predictable effect it has in putting people off the vaccine…..I’d say you have the choice whether to use this data to educate and question (which I am keen on) vs lining it up to try and convince people they should fear or think twice about getting the vaccine.”

Jesse quoted from Ministry of Health directives and had also read some questioning scientific articles, but he could not get past the conclusion that vaccination was an obvious public good and for this reason, he declined to have Guy on air.

The ‘obvious public good’ narrative has come in for some recent criticism. The BMJ printed an opinion piece in July entitled “Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?“. Or try this referenced substack article which reports that the negative harm/benefit ratio in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine trials has been acknowledged in a scientific journal article. In other words, there is more harm than benefit.

We wonder what is Jesse’s assessment of current evidence? He is on our mailing list, but the correspondence has only been one way since Dec 7th.

An Underlying Assumption That Biotech Medicine Interventions Are Safe

For us, the central early point of pandemic misinformation has been the underlying assumption that biotech medicine interventions could be safe.

There really was little or no evidence to justify such an attitude, in fact, as we have discussed, there was a great deal of published pre-pandemic evidence to justify caution. It seems to me that Jesse and most other MSM pandits were probably under-informed on this point.

Given the central role of DNA in human physiology, altering its function was from the outset potentially catastrophic. We are now facing Covid vaccine outcomes that not only involve serious individual adverse effects but also potentially affect whole populations in the longer term. These outcomes include:

• Elevated excess all-cause death rates and lowered longevity
• Lowered birth rates and fertility

The evidence for these is patchy because governments are not rushing to publish data, but it is still very convincing. So concerning in fact, that the Israeli government has covered up key data and scientific conclusions.

The latest comprehensive evidence for Covid vaccine induced excess all cause mortality can be found in a just published analysis: Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022.

Sudden Deaths Among All Ages are Being Normalised

It is extraordinary how this perilous new normal has found its way into advertising messages, but not into serious commentary. Today we watched a TV ad for a funeral home which arranges alternative and appropriate funerals for those dying young, whilst a British Heart Foundation appeal featured a young woman collapsing on the football field. It did so in order to encourage donations.

Sudden deaths among all ages are being normalised in the public’s mind because they really are happening at a rate that dwarfs the past, as insurance data confirms. However here in New Zealand, we are still being subjected to puerile government advertising devoid of scientific caution. Like this MoH promotion which turned up this morning:

GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER—I’ve had three shots, do I really need another booster? Current evidence shows your protection against severe infection slowly decreases over time—GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER

No mention of safety, no mention of efficacy, and the term ‘current evidence’ is bandied about inappropriately as if this advert is scientifically up to date and reliable. It isn’t

So why has it become so unfashionable to be concerned about rising death rates and lowered birth rates? You might find a clue in this frightening pre-pandemic article from the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Corporation “Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care spending: Report”. Are higher death rates good news for people with this kind of perspective? We hope not.

Are we being too harsh? No. This involves the health and life of young people on the doorstep of a bright future.

In the Uncertain Covid Climate of Fear

When teaching, kindness and understanding go a long way towards improving communication and successful learning. We are clearly on a learning curve here. The poor vaccination outcomes were never anticipated, the adverse effects were initially disbelieved on principle, and blamed on misinformation.

We can understand that, in the uncertain Covid climate of fear, people took sides and trusted the official Ministry of Health narrative, but continuing to do so now doesn’t fit the published scientific narrative or the public data. Caution was and is a very scientific strategy, it never deserved bad press.

We’re reaching out here. Those offering advice to the public need to be more discerning if they wish to contribute to the well being and longevity of our society. MSM language has become extreme, and it is increasingly polarising without a foundation in science.

The sad reality is that medicine is a very conservative profession. Most medical procedures are locked in during training and seldom challenged for years after. Biotechnology interventions lie outside of the boundaries of past medical practice. What we need to do without anger, politics, or extremism is to talk through the fear of Covid and discuss the risks of biotechnology.

There is still a chance for seasoned journalists to cover the pandemic with an open mind. It is happening elsewhere. GB News for example has gained one of the largest prime time news audiences in the UK. Why not initiate a more open public debate? Cooling rhetoric and decreasing polarisation can only lead to better outcomes. Fresh air never harms anyone, it can save lives.

Co-Authors: Guy Hatchard and Narayani Hatchard

What are the wider implications for personal health, pandemic policy and mitigation strategies?

For some time there have been anecdotal reports circulating concerning the appearance and formation of unusual rubbery blood clots which have been detected in Covid vaccinated individuals who have died.

Some embalmers, pathologists, and funeral home directors have noted extensive white proteinous fibrous structures blocking arteries, unique in their experience, which may have played a role in the etiology and pathology of fatal illness.

If you have been following the issue, you will have seen photographs and/or videos of these structures like this short video from a concerned British funeral home owner, or you might have heard senior US pathologist Dr Ryan Cole discuss the phenomenon.

This issue is contentious and the subject of sceptical comment from some quarters, but the record number of unexplained deaths, even among the young, and the relentless and reckless promotion of mRNA vaccines points to a need for closer investigation.

Dr Jessica Rose, a postdoc biochemist, who blogs on Substack and podcasts on Audible, has released a probing scientific analysis of the possible causes of this widely recognised clotting phenomenon under the title “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to haemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?”. This article is both highly technical and partly speculative, but it is worth extracting some of the take home warnings and conclusions.

First of all note that this is the kind of precautionary post trial analysis that was omitted by Pfizer and others as they rushed mRNA vaccines to market. The reason behind 10 year approval cycles for previous vaccines is precisely because unexpected effects in the vaccine research field are the norm rather than the exception. The introduction of biotech jabs should have raised red flags about the short trial time frames, but it didn’t.

Dr Rose examines the possibility that the Covid mRNA vaccination causes haemolysis (rupture of red blood cells) releasing massive amounts of haemoglobin. And then asks: does the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, trigger misfolding of the haemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots and oxygen incapacity?

In other words, does the spike protein have prion-like properties that are causing chain clotting reactions (including microclots) which can cause death? Dr Rose thinks the answer to this question is a ‘YES’ and calls for more research to investigate the phenomenon.

Prions are pathogens that cause disease because of their misfolded shape rather than their biology. Misfolded proteins do not function like their correctly folded cousins and they are associated with neuro-degenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Prions can transform or ‘teach’ other proteins to misfold. It’s not really teaching as much as the disallowance of proper folding in adjacent proteins which then spreads further.

Disease-causing prions can resist proteolysis – the process which under normal conditions removes misfolded proteins. Protected from correction, prions can initiate an autocatalytic chain reaction which forms alien obstructive structures in the physiology. In Mad Cow Disease for example a prion chain reaction progressively replaces healthy structures in the brain.

Dr Rose outlines a plausible chain of events in the blood along with supporting evidence from VAERS data. According to Dr Rose, the reported incidence of porphyria, a rare disease normally caused by genetic defects, has increased in VAERS data by 17,265% when compared to years prior to the introduction of mRNA vaccination.

Porphyrins play a key role in the chain of reactions that produce haemoglobin. Porphyria is an accumulation of porphyrins in the liver or bone marrow due to defects in the porphyrin development pathway.

In addition to a wide range of severe physical and mental symptoms, porphyria can be associated with haemoglobin instability. Rupture of red blood cells is a necessary precondition for the release of unstable haemoglobin proteins susceptible to misfolding.

The increased incidence of porphyria raises another important safety issue which has consistently dogged the introduction of new drugs, vaccines, and even novel food ingredients. There is often an underlying assumption that chemical, physiological, biological, or genetic components perform single functions in isolation. This is invariably incorrect. Most have multiple roles. Altering one function, in the hope of correcting a single imbalance, can affect a whole range of other systems and outcomes.

Acute porphyria, in addition to physical symptomatology such as abdominal pain, has a psychiatric manifestations include hysteria, anxiety, depression, phobias, psychosis, organic disorders, agitation, delirium, and altered consciousness ranging from somnolence to coma. Some patients develop psychosis similar to schizophrenia. All of these effects come down to a dysfunction in physical red blood cell formation.

As we have discussed previously, psychological effects of genetic and epigenetic interventions including mRNA vaccines remains a largely unexplored field, but not one where safety can be assumed a priori. Yet that is precisely what has happened. Absence of evidence (since no one has looked for or measured effects) is not evidence of absence.

There is currently a lot of Covid hysteria, anxiety, agitation, and even phobia without much of a scientific or rational basis especially when you sit back and examine current Covid science publishing and data.

In summary, a whole range of naive safety assumptions have dogged the roll out of mRNA technology, and we have not yet adequately assessed the final outcomes of mRNA serious adverse effects.

Dr Rose raises a number of questions that require more investigation. Importantly, she urges extreme caution concluding:

“Everyone needs to know why it’s essential not to introduce potential agents to disrupt the haemoglobin forming and clotting pathways [as the spike protein induced by mRNA vaccination does]. There are so many ways that things can go wrong. Which, is again, why I don’t understand why there are so many exceedingly arrogant humans who think it’s a good idea to mess with biology [using biotechnology].”

At the Hatchard Report we have already written about the persistence of the spike protein for months after mRNA vaccination and its capacity to accumulate in diverse organ systems. For this reason, it is clear that mRNA vaccine induced clotting can potentially affect all our organ systems in diverse areas of the physiology. The extent of this effect varies from individual to individual. There are currently inadequate procedures in the New Zealand health system to monitor such effects post vaccination or post mortem in order to investigate their extent more closely.

We started out by considering the causes of fibrous proteinous blood clots among the vaccinated, but by taking a wider angle of consideration we have realised that genetic interventions can threaten the holistic stability of life including even mental stability. Genetic structures connect mind and body.

All-cause mortality has surged to unprecedented levels around the world initiating the sharpest fall in longevity in 100 years. There is really only one sensible course of action—an energetic multidisciplinary approach to assess the range of adverse effects of human genetic intervention. The effort should be aimed squarely at pausing biotech and finding mitigating health strategies. This will require open minds. Successful mitigation will have to identify, include, and encourage proven dietary and lifestyle initiatives. Carrying on with present policies regardless is not an option.

Which only leads us back to our very own incautious blinkered government, health advisors, and administrators who this week ramped up the advertising budget yet again to encourage second boosters for everyone and a fifth shot for those with immune deficiencies; completely ignoring accumulating evidence that mRNA vaccination itself causes immune deficiency, while boosters are associated with increased all-cause mortality.

Our government has also launched a new advertising campaign praising the recent closure of District Health Boards and the introduction of centralised control of medicine. According to the advertising campaign, there are now more opportunities for contactless virtual medical consultations. In other words, you don’t need to meet a doctor in person, you can get your medical help directly from…who?? Hopefully it’s not the central government.

The UK government recommends against offering the Pfizer Covid mRNA vaccine for pregnant women, those who might suspect that they could be pregnant, and anyone who is breastfeeding.

A carefully nuanced statement within a document entitled “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” (the latest revised version released on 16th August 2022) says:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.…Women of childbearing potential….are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time..”

The report concludes there never was any safety data for pregnant or lactating mothers and blames the rush to get everyone vaccinated for the lack of caution and incorrect safety advice previously offered by the government.

Here in distant New Zealand, which has been deliberately isolated from international information by our government, we are still being subjected to government advertising and MSM promotional articles advising that it is recommended for pregnant people (??) to take the experimental mRNA biotech shot including boosters.

In contrast to the UK government, pregnant mothers are advised that there are no safety issues or uncertainties.

Yet our all-cause mortality is running at 35% above the long term average.

Rising all cause Deaths are Related to Booster Uptake

The UK government has thereby provided an answer to just one question among the many that remain unanswered. Prominent substack writer Steve Kirsh lists 23 unanswered questions about the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines.

Over the last many months, Mr. Kirsh has offered large sums of money to any vaccine-advocating scientists who will debate these questions with him. There have been no takers.

Among the 23 questions, the prize goes to the gathering dark shadow of rising all cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries across the globe. Mathematician Igor Chudov has given mathematical and statistical validity to what is obvious if you look at graphs of all-cause mortality.

His linear regression of publicly available official death data from 29 countries, calculates an ironclad statistical relationship between booster rates and deaths (p= 0.0002 or 99.98% certainty). In other words, boosters and deaths go together like bread and butter. The statistical details are linked here.

The refusal to publicly debate safety despite mounting and overwhelming evidence of related deaths, marks vaccine advocates as aspiring members of a ruling elite who believe themselves above accountability, ethics, and human rights.

Curiously if any among their number changes sides and entertains counter safety data, they are cast aside. Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Mobeen Syed, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John Campbell, and many, many others started out their public commentaries strongly in favour of Covid vaccination. They are all vaccinated. Now they are all very publicly raising alarm bells about safety, but refer any vaccine advocate to their work (if you can) and these responsible doctors are rejected as unreliable (no reasons given).

How Have the Covid Ruling Elites Formed?

Ruling elites rely on enforcement of power structures and supremacy myths. They are often members of a single ethnic, professional or political group. They exclude and persecute those raising questioning or dissenting voices.

Such groups can attract narcissistic personalities and psychopaths (a serious personality disorder characterized by antisocial behavior, untruthfulness, irresponsibility, and lack of remorse or empathy) to join their ranks. Among ruling elites there is little room for debate or rationality.

The 4 C’s—careerism, conformism, coercion, and corruption are very busy around the world propping up the Covid vaccine safety narrative against evidence that has now become overwhelming.

In New Zealand, we are writing the book on suppression of information in order to save the reputation and protect the pockets of our ruling elites. To achieve this, the health of pregnant women and their unborn children, as well as the longevity of the population, including the very young, appear to have been judged expendable.