Florida authorities have ceased offering mRNA vaccines to young males aged 18-39, citing the risk of myocarditis. A few countries, notably in Scandinavia, have clarified their pre-vaccination advice to young men and urged a degree of caution. Florida has copped a lot of flack over its precautionary decision, and the CDC is counter-advising everyone to go ahead and boost regardless.

The risk of myocarditis for women has been found to be only slightly less (and curiously, in at least one study higher). However, women are still being advised in most jurisdictions they should take the jab—sure, it’s safe for women, it must be. Women also face additional risks. Risks connected to fertility, pregnancy, stillbirth, and breastfeeding (see here also). Indicative data on these appears to have been brushed over, hidden, or simply ignored.

In fact, reliable V-safe data shows that more women than men reported injuries after Covid vaccination. Women seem to have more difficulty persuading medical officials to take their issues seriously.

This points to lopsided ideas about risk. Are women’s lives perceived to be worth less? The misogyny involved might have escaped your notice until now, but questions about the morality of biotech medical risk assessment, in general, have probably occupied your thoughts from time to time during the pandemic.

I’m not going to use the term myocarditis, preferring now to say it how it is—heart disease—with all the normally associated life-shortening risks and the requirement for a lifetime of caution, moderation, monitoring, and treatment. The post-vaccination risk of developing heart disease is not just very high; it is unprecedented. People are falling ill and dropping dead because of it in numbers never seen before, including women.

Sign up to receive our newsletter!

Covid Hysteria is Being Used as an Antidote to Protest

To counter voices urging caution, the pharmaceutical industry, the medical establishment, governments, and MSM have curated Covid hysteria—irrational fear of Covid. Now that the data is becoming even more clear about the huge risks of the jab, they can’t stop, nor apparently does hardly anyone want to. It is difficult to escape the notion that there is a bunker mentality and a tinge of madness involved.

Last Friday, Purolator, the Canadian courier system 91% owned by Canada Post, terminated all its unvaccinated employees. Trudeau meanwhile, like Ardern feels that “using protest to demand changes to public policy is something I think worrysome”. In Canada, being concerned that you have been fired for avoiding a potentially life-threatening medical intervention is good cause for Trudeau to label you “mysogenist and racist”; asking why “do we tolerate these people?” Short answer: they don’t tolerate the unvaccinated in Canada, they persecute them.

Is Biotechnology Worth All the Sudden Unexpected Deaths?

You don’t need me to answer this silly question, but it does actually require some thought to find out why we need to ask it. Have you noticed that aside from being dangerous and ineffective, biotechnology is incredibly expensive?

Most highly vaccinated nations are going broke. In the UK, incredibly rich Rishi Sunak has raised the pension age to 68 and reinstituted austerity into the foreseeable future. Here in NZ, the pandemic has cost $75 billion, which is about twice the annual health budget of our little island nation. It is all printed or borrowed money, and the piper will have to be paid sooner or later.

This giant expenditure has had no real measurable results except misery, poverty, and continuing spread of ill health. Health systems around the world are collapsing under the weight of untreated patients. All-cause mortality is at record levels.

Contrast this with the cost of natural immunity, it’s free, and it works. Get a bit of exposure to sunshine, eat healthily, exercise regularly, and avoid unhealthy habits like smoking, excess hard fats, ultra-processed foods, and fizzy drinks. Studies show that your risk of serious Covid illness will fall by 70%.

Biotech Foods Pose Risks to Health and the Environment Despite Claims to the Contrary

Don’t be taken in by the wave of synthetic foods and additives appearing on supermarket shelves. Two weeks ago, the FDA declared lab-grown chicken meat developed by Berkeley, California-based food-tech firm Upside Foods as safe for human consumption. The associated commercial hype is promising an abundant, safe, tasty alternative to meat, but the reality is a world away.

So far, Upside Foods, which used to be called Memphis Meats, has attracted a billion dollars of investment and interest from figures and entities such as Cargill, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, Kimbal Musk, brother of Elon Musk and co-founder of The Kitchen, “a growing family of businesses that pursues an America where everyone has access to real food,” and the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Synthetic meat is not going to come cheap. Its production in giant bioreactors is energy hungry (nor is it going to reduce greenhouse gases). The process of cloning meat involves using a mixture of bovine serum (most likely from fetal calves found in cows being slaughtered) and enzymes from the pancreas and intestines of animals. The process also uses engineered genes to promote continuous growth of the cells. This is disturbing in that it is likely that the genes being manipulated can promote cancers.

Bioreactors used to make synthetic foods typically suffer from accumulation of toxic byproducts. Eventually, the leftover toxic genetic sludge has to be dumped somewhere.

Support the Hatchard Report

Nature Really Does Know How to Organise Better Than Man

Give real chickens a go. They’re inexpensive, and they work. Chickens convert sunlight into meat and eggs very efficiently. You don’t need to be a highly-paid Ph.D. in biotechnology or own a giant bioreactor. A homemade coup and run in your backyard is sufficient. Your power bill will remain the same. Chickens reproduce without the need for genetic accelerants. Their waste doesn’t pose a problem for the environment, and it will fertilise your garden. Ditto for vegetables.

Yet Upside Foods will have you think otherwise. They are happy to play upon ignorance and prejudice. Before you know it, they will have you eating a questionable meat substitute while thinking you are saving the world. You are not, you are harming it and mortgaging your future, and that of your children.

The Reality of Biotechnology is a Lot Different, It’s Frightening

All over the world, the Covid Industrial Complex has been hiding adverse reactions, reaping huge profits, and covering its tracks whilst spinning lies about a non-existent bright future:

The authoritative UK Daily Telegraph leads with “ Top virologists betrayed science with their Covid lab leak cover-up.” Yet gain of function experimentation which caused the pandemic is ongoing.

In a seven-hour sealed deposition and a farewell address from the White House, on the eve of his retirement, Dr. Fauci was still insisting that mRNA vaccines stop the spread of coronavirus and that lockdowns really work.

Widespread public protests in China indicate that mandated jabs plus lockdowns are a road to social deprivation and the consequent unprecedented civil unrest.

Pandemic policy has left us bankrupt, anxious, and controlled by a medical/pharmaceutical elite. Human life has been devalued. Despite the almost universal vaccination, we are still suffering from waves of Covid illness with no end in sight. There is no wayback machine that comes with biotechnology.

Call for an end to biotechnology experimentation now, before it is too late. Visit GLOBE.GLOBAL for more information.

Photo by Dollar Gill on Unsplash

The answer is really quite simple. A year ago, I wrote about constitutional change, thinking naively that it presented a road ahead to protect us from ill-considered and unfair mandates. A safeguard that would protect our natural human rights. I have changed my opinion completely. You will, too, if you consider what we know about the basic equations of life and how the pandemic has destructively interfered with them.

The second law of thermodynamics states that as energy is transferred or transformed, more and more of it is wasted. In simple terms, this implies that entropy or disorder is always increasing in the universe. Like a fire burning in your front room, it is gradually running out of fuel.

There is one exception to this: living systems. Living systems are swimming against the current; they are increasing in order, they are evolving. This area is the subject of nonequilibrium thermodynamics. The remarkable molecule that orchestrates this miracle is DNA. DNA is found in every living cell, managing the trillions of actions that maintain life.

If you uncoil each strand of DNA in a cell and place them end to end, they would be 2 metres long. This might sound deceptively manageable, but we have trillions of cells and therefore a lot of DNA. Each DNA molecule contains 204 billion atoms. Stretch out all your DNA, and the resulting strand would be 107 billion kilometres long—about the same as 150,000 round trips to the Moon.

DNA is so vital to life that it is highly protected. Our human body is designed so that both air and food enter only through the mouth. Food is then filtered by our complex digestive system whose biomolecular processes transform our natural food (which is also based on DNA), into usable nutrients and building blocks through a myriad of steps only completed over the course of a month. Every single atom in the physiology is replaced according to a fixed order every 5 to 10 years. Ensuring our life is constantly being refreshed.

It doesn’t stop there. Each cell is highly protected from degradation, pollution, and the effects of radiation. Firstly by the cell wall which is largely successful in preventing the entry of toxins, pathogens, and pollutants. Deep inside the cell is the nucleus which contains the DNA. This is also highly protected. In each of our 37 trillion cells, there are 70,000 DNA repair jobs that are executed each day, ensuring as far as possible that the structure of DNA is stable and protected from radiation induced mutation.

Life Already Has a Constitution—DNA

There is a grand conclusion here—life already has a constitution, a sort of Cosmic Constitution—our DNA. DNA contains the miracle set of intelligent instructions which ensure that the second law of thermodynamics—the law of universal decay—is not just circumvented, but actually reversed to become a law of evolution. The myriad of living things on earth are guided, protected, and promoted by DNA (I have recently written about evolution, genetics, and the pandemic at length and you can download the paper here).

DNA is not a small collection of ideas such that you might find in the 85,000 words of a typical book or even in the entire collections of large libraries, it contains both sequential instructions and cross referencing between its billions of integrated components. Each gene engages in many collaborative projects with other genes. DNA has also stored the memories of countless microbiological undertakings through millions of years of species evolution which have protected and promoted life on the planet. It really is the Cosmic Constitution of Life with a capital L.

Now Consider What We Are Currently Doing to Ourselves

We have been exposed to novel genetically engineered pathogens, designed through gain of function experiments to make people seriously ill. In response, we are bypassing the natural safeguards of digestion by injecting material directly into the body. This material contains microscopic lipid nanoparticles. Particles that are designed to breach the protective cell wall. It also contains instructions designed to alter the way DNA works and/or expresses itself. Once inside the cell, these are capable of transcribing themselves into our nuclear DNA, corrupting its structure.

Once DNA is corrupted, it loses its incredible ability to overcome the second law of thermodynamics. We become subject to the laws of decay, rapid decay. If you want to know why so many people are becoming ill and dying this is it in a nutshell.

This is not a flight of fancy. The second law of thermodynamics is one of the most highly verified laws known to physics. Similarly, Ilya Prigogine was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1977 for his contributions to nonequilibrium thermodynamics, particularly the theory of dissipative structures which characterise living systems.

Imagine with me for a moment how a few biotechnologists subject to the same human vagaries and frailties as everyone else—mistakes, greed, limited perception of consequences, emotional instability, pride, and so on—are redesigning DNA according to their immature ideas of what life is.

They have no understanding of where or how human consciousness, compassion, and harmony originated. Their ideas about immunity are very mechanical, tentative, and have often been in great error, yet they are going ahead and injecting almost the whole population of the world with experimental biotech concoctions and waiting to see what happens.

Well they are seeing it now—excess deaths on a scale never before seen outside of wartime—but apparently they can’t believe their eyes. So they are looking the other way. I suppose there was an expectation of reward, plaudits, and victory parades. Possibly disappointed but undeterred they are calling for yet more injections. Convinced that they must be right, they keep pressing ahead, editing the very heart of living processes.

The massive public relations onslaught of biotechnology has had its numbing effect. People are falling ill, unable to work, or going to hospital in numbers which are clogging health services. Still many are raising angry voices against those who are unvaccinated because they have been sold a story that they alone are to blame. No government agency is prepared to reveal just how many cancers, cardiac events, hospitalisations, and sudden deaths there are. No government will let slip that they have genetically vaccinated their people to the point that suddenly they might have become detached from the river of evolution and are now subject to universal laws of decay.

Biotechnology experimentation cannot be contained. The effects of genetic editing are highly mobile and can spread without limit, as we have seen during the pandemic. They are passed onto future generations and cannot be recalled.

There is only one sure way out of the pandemic—protect the Cosmic Constitution of life—DNA. Join the campaign for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation. Go to GLOBE.GLOBAL for more information.

Guy is the author of ‘Your DNA Diet: Leveraging the Power of Consciousness To Heal Ourselves and Our World. An Ayurvedic Blueprint For Health and Wellness’.

Photo by Mathew MacQuarrie on Unsplash

As the published Covid science narrative evolves overseas, Professor Baker is doing his best to prop it up here with his own special brand of magic beans.

At this point in time, the research findings of harm from the Pfizer vaccine have become overwhelming, but Baker is sticking closely to the safe and effective fantasy.

Even the most timid amongst us, fearful of visiting the internet, might have noticed that the vaccine doesn’t actually work, but Baker, in a kid gloves interview with Sean Plunket of The Platform, reassured us all that the mRNA biotech vaccine was still protecting us from serious illness and death. Is this misleading us?

The incredibly pro-vaccine Washington Post varies from Baker. It has now finally stopped holding the line. It headlines with “It’s no longer a pandemic of the unvaccinated”. It reports that even the US CDC, with a lack of a centralised health system and with its penchant for figures that exaggerate vaccine effectiveness, are roughly estimating that 58% of Americans who died from Covid in August are vaccinated. So the vaccinated are dying of Covid contrary to the Baker doctrine. Unbelievably, like Baker, the Post thinks this means we need more vaccines???

The UK ONS, who, unlike the CDC, are considered to compile accurate figures which cover countrywide Covid stats, is painting a much bleaker picture.

In 2022 there have been 41,000 excess all-cause deaths since April 1st. No official statement has endorsed any cause, but the figures are telling. Mortality per 100,000 pop. has been lowest among the unvaccinated for every month in 2022 that ONS figures are currently available (see chart). The implication is obvious.

Raw figures released by the New Zealand Ministry of Health paint a picture of deaths that is consistent with the US and UK figures; the boosted are disproportionately affected by Covid deaths (see chart), but Baker has chosen to pass over these figures.

The basis for Baker’s omission of this raw data, is a mysterious and unexplained adjustment (???) that the Ministry of Health have applied to these figures since July. Baker and the Ministry of Health claim that the booster shots protect you from serious illness and death, but the actual basis of this assertion appears to be nothing other than the medical establishment believing thoroughly in Covid vaccination—it couldn’t be otherwise.

Baker also claims that the scientific evidence about Covid vaccination from leading journals investigating cohorts of millions of people is overwhelming. I agree it is, but not in the way he suggests. A recently published study in the Lancet of 30 million people has found that the elderly, the immunologically compromised, and those with comorbidities remain at risk of serious illness and death despite being boosted. This study terminates at 28 Feb 2022, thereby it avoids the truly terrifying vulnerability that appears in the all-cause UK death statistics from that date onwards, but the results reported by the Lancet are still very concerning.

The study shows that any small protective effect that Covid vaccination offers wear off rapidly over 9-10 weeks. Other studies in prestigious journals referenced in the paper show it then enters negative territory by four months. In other words, you rapidly end up more vulnerable to Covid infection than before, and incidentally, as the ONS figures strongly suggest, you are then likely to be more vulnerable to death from any cause. The conclusion invariably reached in MSM and among experts—that this shows we need more vaccination—has come to have a distinctly hollow ring about it. Are we now to be vaccinated every two months?

Because the authors of the huge Lancet study are actually responding to a pro-vaccine government committee, they have to nuance their advice and concerns saying for example:

“Our findings indicate a range of demographic and clinical factors associated with increased clinical risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes despite booster vaccination and raise questions regarding future approaches to enhance protection.”

At this stage, the authors admit, these questions remain unanswered. They suggest that more surveillance of data should be undertaken and a range of possible alternative treatments explored. They also suggest that modification of vaccines and other approaches are “unlikely to overcome immune suppression in the most vulnerable groups”.

The subtext of their guarded conclusions is obvious to the skilled reader used to pro-vaccine speak—the Covid vaccine landscape has changed and there are real worries surfacing. Not the least of these is the suspicion that the vaccine itself is compromising immunity and causally complicit in the record levels of excess deaths seen in highly vaccinated countries around the world including New Zealand.

We didn’t have hear any of this from Baker, he left us snug in a soft blanket of reassurance—It is all OK, don’t worry. In the Plunket interview, he was at pains to place great emphasis on the fact that he is an expert, while others like myself are laughable cherry pickers of facts. You decide. If you read my work regularly you will be aware that I reference my writing carefully to published studies.

Baker conceded that everything we know now is going to be proven wrong in the future. Thank you for that. He is hedging his bets. He is not alone. Politifact, one of the internet’s leading fact checkers (???) admits that “embalmers are finding strange clots in jabbed people”, but escapes any meaningful acknowledgement of concern that the vaccine may be causing heart attacks by suggesting that the clots must be due to Covid infection—no credible evidence for this is supplied.

Baker tries to pull the same trick, he suggests that the rash of sudden deaths among all ages is due to undiagnosed (???) Covid infection. In other words, people are catching Covid but they have no symptoms nor a positive test result and they suddenly drop dead because they have weak hearts. Do you believe that? I don’t. It is about as plausible as a suggestion that aliens are running our parliament.

We could laugh Baker off, if it wasn’t for the fact that tragically people are dying and the media including Sean Plunket are still not asking sufficiently probing questions or in most cases any questions. Nor are any debates being arranged. If you trust the media, think again, they are asleep at the wheel or complicit in a coverup. The government plus the loyal opposition meanwhile are sailing on regardless, boosted by a strong following wind. Any concession to the growing tide of concerns would at this stage condemn them to the political wilderness—a pandemic outcome they cannot and will not countenance against all evidence.

The recent confirmation via biomolecular studies that Covid is very highly likely to have resulted from the lab escape of an engineered pathogen, places both Covid and mRNA vaccination on a similarly sinister footing. This release investigates their effect on individual cognitive ability, social conditions, and the implications for public policy.

Covid-19 almost certainly results not solely from a naturally occurring virus known to exist in wild populations, but from a largely secret gain of function experiment designed to radically enhance viral pathogenesis through cutting and pasting of genetic structures and instructions, some natural and some engineered.

Covid vaccines are engineered genetic interventions taking over our human cells and commanding them to produce the same toxic spike protein as the Covid-19 virus and in large quantities.

We are only just beginning to appreciate the risks shared by both.

A study completed in India “Assessing functional connectivity differences and work-related fatigue in surviving COVID-negative patients” has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain and detected cerebro-vascular abnormalities two weeks after recovery from Covid infection and hospital discharge.

Functional connectivity (FC) is a measure of how regions of the brain interact with each other. In the Indian study of university students who had recently been hospitalised with Covid but now tested negative for the virus, subjects showed significant changes in functional connectivity in a number of different sites in the brain when compared to controls who did not have any history of Covid infection. FC changes were noted in areas of the brain associated with:

• Attention processing
• Visual processing
• Cognitive processing
• Emotional processing
• Language processing
• Social cognitive processing
• Memory

The study was published 1st February 2022 and therefore it is likely that the subjects predominantly had Delta variant infection. In common with many other recent studies, the authors did not report the vaccination status of subjects, a significant deficiency. The students were from the Indian Institute of Technology which currently has a policy to require Covid vaccination. As a result, any contribution of Covid vaccination to outcomes could not be assessed or measured. Given the engineered components of both Covid and mRNA Covid vaccination, more differentiated study design and analysis should have been required.

In western developed nations, the vast majority of populations have been vaccinated, many with repeated boosters. It is essential that future studies always differentiate between outcomes for both the vaccinated and unvaccinated. This should always analyse frequency and type of Covid vaccination

A preprint study in March 2022 reported changes to the immune function of glial cells in the brain as a result of mRNA vaccination. Glial cells play a crucial role in supporting brain function. Glial cell impairment may have a role in reducing FC, pointing to possible confounding complications due to mRNA vaccination which should have been discussed and assessed.

Poor Functional Connectivity is Associated With Aging and Cognitive Impairment

Earlier studies, unrelated to Covid, suggest functional impairments in the occipital and parietal lobes such as those found in the Indian study could be associated with:

• Loss of motivation in day-to-day tasks
• Mild cognitive impairment
• Fatigue

In some cases even a single very small brain lesion, as found for example in some epilepsy patients, can cause widespread change in functional connectivity throughout the brain. The Indian authors suspect that FC lesions observed in the Covid patients could be playing a similar role in the development of Long Covid symptoms such as brain fog.

It is significant that lesions which cause dysfunction in the brain (sometimes referred to as ‘functional holes’) have been associated with violent and aggressive behaviour (see here and here). In addition to brain injury and inherited conditions, their origin and effect has been found to be connected with genetic and biomolecular moderators—factors that could be affected by both Covid infection and mRNA vaccination.

The subjects in the Indian study of Covid outcomes following hospitalisation had widely varying FC scores—some were affected more than others. It found that FC patterns in the Covid group were correlated with a self-reported fatigue scale.

Enhanced Structural and Functional Connectivity is Associated With Measures of Intelligence

The human brain is characterized by structural and functional connectivity within and between brain regions. This can be measured in different ways by both fMRI and EEG (electroencephalogram—measurement and fourier analysis of electrical signals in the brain measured on the scalp surface). High EEG connectivity measured by phase and frequency coherence between brain regions has been correlated with:

• Concept Learning
• Moral Reasoning
• IQ
• Decreased Neuroticism
• Creativity
• Neurological Efficiency measured by the H-Reflex

These associations were found among subjects who had practiced meditation regularly for some time and indicated the opposite of reduced cognitive ability associated with increasing age. The findings suggest that meditation may be useful in Long Covid recovery. This should be investigated.

The FC Changes Observed in Recovered Covid Patients Are Consistent With the Effects of Aging

Studies linked here and here have found measures of general functional connectivity decrease with age across a wide range of brain structures and are associated with cognitive impairment.

Classic psychological impairments known to be connected with aging among some individuals include:

• Fluctuating levels of alertness accompanied by fearful, irritable, and aggressive behaviour
• Low concentration levels and consequent difficulty taking the decisions necessary for everyday tasks
• Impaired social functioning and cooperation
• Clouding of awareness, depression, and loneliness

The psychological effects of Covid infection and vaccination have hardly been studied. The Indian study points to the need for more assessment of psychological effects of Covid. Given the confounding psychological effects of lockdowns and fear of Covid, it is not clear to what extent damage to functional connections in the brain could play a significant role. Nor is it clear how long these effects might last.

The Pandemic is a Gradually Unfolding Social Tragedy

It is notable that a number of public institutions appear to be functioning below their designed capacity and failing to meet urgent targets. It is apparent that social polarisation has increased during the pandemic. Violent crime has also increased. Workplace absenteeism has increased. Inflation and economic circumstances have worsened. Obviously these have multiple causes, but in the final analysis all come down at root to the aggregated acts of individuals.

There is scope for longitudinal investigation and assessment to find out if these circumstances of social dysfunction could be in part due to physical effects of Covid infection and/or Covid vaccination on individual brain function. Are either having a significant impact on social cooperation, economic activity, and individual well being?

There Are Implications for Human Genetic Stability

There have been over half a million papers published during the Covid pandemic. It is easy to miss key findings. Crucially the Indian study confirms that biotech interventions and experimentation can be associated with declines in cognitive ability that mimic ageing. It should ring alarm bells. As its findings involve the little known and technically complex cutting edge of brain research, serious implications may have been overlooked. The whole process of human evolution is known to involve unique genetic traits associated with language acquisition and cognitive ability. Any degradation of these will have catastrophic individual and social effects. The implication is obvious: biotech editing must be paused—it’s dangerous.

Believe me, biotechnology has gotten out of hand. Epidemiologist Michael Baker was doing the rounds of the media again this week, going through the motions of telling us all to mask up and vaccinate yet again. It wasn’t a very convincing performance, the tide of evidence has turned against him. In an act of mock heroic imagination, he reassured us that excess deaths were due to Covid and nothing else. As vaccination status is not recorded on death certificates, he must be a prophet of biblical ability to reach that conclusion.

But, whether excess deaths are due to Covid or to mRNA vaccination (it’s a mix whose proportions are the subject of ongoing research and academic debate), both are now known to be due to biotechnology editing and experimentation. The full extent of long term outcomes is only just being glimpsed.

In this regard, it is frightening that you can buy home biotechnology CRISPR editing kits for as little as $169 sold under the title BIOHACK THE PLANET. Start worrying, little Johnny is probably not staying up late in his bedroom with a night light reading comics as we did, he could be ending life as we know it.

Seriously though, growing generations are being schooled to accept biotech mutagenesis as ordinary, inherently safe, and a profitable career path, but mutagenesis implies dysfunction which can be either slow and relentless like cancer or swift and final like myocardial infarction. It can quietly steal away the future we were planning to enjoy, not just our future, but the future of our children and their children.

Novel genetic information spreads without limit and cannot be recalled. There are casual risks being introduced almost every day by aspiring biotechnologists, including many in the agriculture and food sectors, which can accumulate in the biosphere. They are eating away at genetic stability, until tipping points like the Covid pandemic are inevitably reached.

The complexity of microbiological life is unimaginable. It has proved resilient through the ages, but its fragility in the face of biotech editing has now been laid bare. We should know from our pandemic experience, biotechnology experiments can upset the natural balance previously inherited intact through millions of generations.

Time for Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation. Go to GLOBE.GLOBAL for more information.

We now confidently know that Covid-19 and mRNA vaccines both came from the same stable—experimental biotechnology laboratories. As the old saying goes two wrongs do not make a right. In our case, they made a disaster which could and should have been confidently predicted by anyone knowledgeable working in the field.

For the last thirty years it has been well known that gene editing causes unintended consequences. Experiments on animals, crops, and now synthetic meats have been throwing up unexpected aberrations. Experiments with gene therapy on humans are dogged by failures.

Aberrations and failures both actually translate properly into a six letter word ‘deaths’. The word unexpected is also a misuse of the English language. I should have used inevitable, because that is fully corroborated by past experience.

Thirteen years ago disastrous genetic experiments on cows were already in full swing here in New Zealand sponsored by the government. Genetically modified cows were born with ovaries that grew so large they caused ruptures and killed the animals. They were formed when human genetic code injected into a cow cell was added to an egg from a cow’s ovary and put into a cow’s uterus.

Despite this disaster, under permits subsequently issued by the New Zealand Environmental Risk Management Authority in 2010, AgResearch were authorised to put human genes into goats, sheep and cows for a period of 20 years to see if the animals can produce human proteins in their milk. AgResearch scientists hoped that inserting parts of the human genetic code would enable ruminants to produce milk containing proteins that could be used in human medical applications.

A Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) investigation found deformities and respiratory problems among animals at the facility – something AgResearch had been open about—saying it was a foreseeable by-product of the project. In other words, they knew in advance it would all go to custard.

A Dr. Suttie at AgResearch said the root of the trouble with the cows was that the human FSH genes had affected the whole calf and not the mammary glands only, as was intended – a problem that did not show up in trials on mice. He summarised:

“This was not intended to happen. But, bluntly, this is what research is all about.”

Tell me about it, visit a pharmaceutical testing facility, as I did in the early 2000s, and you will find giant high temperature incinerators built to accommodate the mistakes (for mistakes read maimed animals).

A friend of mine Michael Antoniou, Ph.D., in an October 2022 interview with the Defender, agrees, stating that, 

“innately, gene editing also can bring about unintended DNA damage … even at the site of your intended edit or elsewhere in the DNA of your target cells, with unknown downstream consequences.”

A report published in the Journal of Genetics and Genomics in 2020 found CRISPR gene-editing in rice resulted in numerous unintended and undesirable on-target and off-target mutations.

Antoniou described this as “a grave oversight, because we know that gene editing is not precise … the evidence is there to show that you will always have unintended DNA damage in addition to what you want … a whole spectrum of unintended DNA damage that accumulates at the multiple steps of the gene editing process.”

Antoniou should know, he has been researching gene therapy at prestigious King’s College London for decades. His conclusion: it is at this time neither safe nor effective. Among qualified researchers his opinion is not an outlier, it is the norm, but what makes Antoniou unusual is that he is prepared to speak up publicly.

When gain of function research was restarted in 2017 and at the first sign that Pfizer and others were going to rush production of mRNA vaccines, just about everyone in the gene therapy field should have been shouting ‘NO’ from the rooftops. They didn’t. Many were complicit, some sat on their hands and they are mostly still sitting on their hands even now, as evidence of serious harm accumulates.

Just like the poor New Zealand calves whose lives were maimed and cut short by a biotech experiment, people are dropping dead suddenly or dying slowly from ‘unexpected’ (read inevitable) illness. Still no one in authority wants to know. In fact they are doubling down.

At the latest count 93 doctors have died in Canada during the pandemic, many of them young, but the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has issued advice to doctors encouraging them to insist that their patients are vaccinated, saying:

“It is also important that physicians work with their patients to manage anxieties related to the vaccine and not enable avoidance behaviour. For example, for extreme fear of needles (trypanophobia) or other cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and/or referral to psychotherapy may be available options.”

So the unvaccinated are to be subjected to psychological third degree or chemical restraint.

Once and for all, those in authority seem ignorant and/or confused about the well known mutagenic propensity of biotechnology. Genetic modification is dangerous, very dangerous, and all but impossible to contain, and certainly impossible to recall. If during the last three years you haven’t learned that, you must have a very closed mind, a determined death wish, a reckless greed, or take an unnatural joy in torture.

Those who know about the dangers of biotechnology who have undertaken gain of function research or involved themselves in the project to experimentally inject the entire world’s population with novel instructions overriding complex natural genetic processes, or who have simply kept quiet, are, there is only one word for it, guilty by act or omission.

It is time to close the doors of the biotech laboratories playing with deadly pathogens, the biotech vats, and the ‘we dared’ philosophies. Time to close off the billions of dollars of government funding and commercial investment. Time to shut the door to military involvement. Time to insist that the media tell the truth about dangers and the corrupt fact checkers stop hiding it. The alternatives are too apocalyptic to contemplate.

It is all the fashion today for the media to talk about the next raging contagion and what to do about it.

Stuff newspaper chimes in this morning with “Covid-19 NZ: How to control a pandemic without a lockdown“.

A galaxy of experts (the usual suspects) interviewed by Stuff recommends that we need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars getting ready. According to Prof. Chris Bullen of Auckland University, we need “layers of people and tools on standby”—part of a new public health taskforce, presumably well stocked with highly paid experts and modellers permanently ready to assume control.

If we don’t stop the madness of biotechnology experimentation, they may well be right. There might not be time for anything except fighting off novel engineered pathogens and vaccines, launched by mad scientists around the world eager to keep up the biotech gravy train.

How Many More Must Suffer Before the Covid Jab is Declared a Danger?

Curiously, the article manages to go through its paces without mentioning mRNA vaccines—a first for Stuff. This shouldn’t be a surprise; it is beginning to slowly sink in that mRNA vaccines don’t actually work, and they cause VDEM—Vaccine dependent enhanced disease—the worst-case scenario. mRNA vaccines are making people sick. Read here for a round up of just how sick.

This message hasn’t sunk in yet in Canada where 90 doctors have dropped dead suddenly during the pandemic (and the rate of doctor deaths is accelerating!!). Canadian officials are carrying on regardless, like lemmings over a cliff. Alberta’s Court of Appeal has upheld the requirement that eligible transplant recipients be vaccinated against COVID-19, saying the stipulation did not violate the charter rights of a terminally ill woman who refused to get a Covid inoculation.

Annette Lewis filed a legal challenge against Alberta Health Services, doctors, and a hospital earlier this year after she was unable to get a lifesaving organ transplant due to her unwillingness to be biotech vaccinated. In other words, there is no right to medical choice or treatment. Effectively the judge sentenced the young woman to death.

don’t let the public know anything, we will look like criminals.

There is a publication ban on the doctors’ and the judge’s identities, the organ involved, and the location of the transplant program. Translation: don’t let the public know anything, we will look like criminals. The judge ruled against the application despite new research showing that Covid infection does not affect transplant outcomes (in any case, she doesn’t even have Covid).

Excess All-cause Deaths Have Reached Record Levels

Here in New Zealand and in highly Covid vaccinated countries around the world, excess all-cause deaths have reached record levels, but no politicians are pressing the emergency button. They are not even mentioning it. It’s a taboo subject for the political class.

The US midterm elections passed without so much as a dicky bird of Covid discussion. If you watched US election night coverage, Covid was conspicuous by its absence. The only chink in the armour was Governor Ron DeSantis’ victory speech, where he mentioned Florida had ‘held the line’. DeSantis famously rejected lockdowns, masking, and mandates. He won with a considerably increased margin. A rare improvement on a lackluster night for both parties.

The Next Pandemic is Coming Soon So We Had Better Get the Thought Police in Shape

Ardern is still suggesting that Covid mis- and disinformation are by far the number one concerns of the New Zealand electorate. Speaking at the UN, she said New Zealand’s concern is up at 80%. The polls say otherwise; inflation, climate change, and crime occupy our thoughts. The pandemic concern was down at 8%, and misinformation didn’t even get a look in.

People can’t afford the basics—housing and food, but the media is regaling us with serious talks about how to dob in your neighbours to the SIS if they access the internet too much, practice yoga, or knit. And yes, Ardern headlined with: the next pandemic is coming soon, so we had better get the thought police in shape.

Rising Death Rates Don’t Seem to Bother Politicians Anywhere

At any other time in history, record levels of excess deaths (we are talking thousands) would have caused much soul searching, but not today. David Seymour, leader of the ACT party, thinks we have too little death. He is disappointed not enough Kiwis are allowed to take advantage of euthanasia.

Rising death rates don’t seem to bother politicians anywhere. Watch Mark Steyn on GB News interviewing a former director of the UK Office of Statistics. Steyn says: “It doesn’t get any more basic than dead bodies”. He is an anomaly among media pandits, the silence of the rest is deafening. You have to stay in touch with international science publishing to find out how damning the situation has become, the bodies are piling up.

Where Did the Silence Come From?

Let’s go back to August 2021; vaccinologist Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris, director of the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) spoke to health professionals about the measures that GVDN were proposing to take in order to assess vaccine safety. Undoubtedly Dr. Petousis-Harris’ performance influenced coercive mandate decisions taken very soon afterward by the government with the support of all the other political parties. There is little doubt politicians were erroneously briefed that there were no safety or efficacy issues associated with an mRNA vaccine programme since that became their public messaging.

Dr. Petousis-Harris, with lots of knowing looks and ‘it’s all OK’ asides, gave a run down of her proposed failsafe measures to investigate causality. They were doomed to fail or rather they almost appear to have been designed to fail. The reasons for this were obvious from the start for anyone familiar with the history of biotechnology in general and gene therapy in particular.

Alarm Bells Should Have Gone Off

The process of assessing adverse effects was closely related to the prior experience with traditional vaccines. In other words, there was little recognition that the whole process of mRNA vaccination was based on novel biotechnology and liable to be associated with distinctly different and potentially more serious adverse effects. When the rate of adverse effect reporting went through the roof, there were no alarm bells set off.

Incredibly, Dr. Petousis-Harris omitted to mention or possibly even consider the shortcomings of our adverse event reporting system CARM.

She revealed that analysed data would be limited to the CARM database with the possibility or hope that GVDN might get access to hospital admission data sometime in the following year. CARM is known to be severely under reported, Medsafe estimates that less than 5% of adverse events are reported. CARM data was never going to be representative of adverse event rates and hence the proposed procedure to compare CARM data with historical background rates was flawed from the start. There was no provision to encourage or mandate CARM reporting.

Pfizer and Others Were Busy Hiding Adverse Events

This cavalier attitude to Covid vaccine safety was curated by Pfizer and others who were busy hiding adverse events which occurred during the mRNA vaccine trials. It took a court order to bring them to light. Dr. Petousis-Harris wasn’t just a bystander though. She has been a Pfizer adviser.

Disease categories being investigated for a causal connection with vaccination were limited in advance to a list shared by WHO. This list did not include signs of immune deficiency such as shingles, frequent mild illness, first diagnosis or recurrence of cancer, or sudden unexplained death.

Nor was the possibility of VDEM—Vaccine dependent enhanced disease going to be taken seriously. During questions, Petousis-Harris dismissed this, saying “I don’t think we will see it”. Did they even look?

Crucially, the GVDN programme (the only one granted exclusive access to our New Zealand health data) decided on an approach to adverse event assessment that ruled out any long term effects of vaccination in advance. This involved designating an event window following vaccination. Only adverse events in a short time period following vaccination would be counted as related to vaccination; other events would be ruled unrelated. Conveniently this means that current high all-cause death rates couldn’t possibly be due to vaccination (???).

Earlier this year GVDN decided to ignore the growing safety signals and double down. The May GVDN newsletter labelled vaccine hesitancy as the main threat to public health. You could be forgiven if you thought their purpose is not to assess vaccine safety but rather to ensure that vaccines appear safe at all costs.

Politicians Have Rejected Any Notion of Responsibility

So are politicians being played by our experts, or are they willing participants in a global disinformation process ultimately curated by people and corporations who stood to make massive profits from the pandemic? Whichever is the case, politicians have been sufficiently sure of their own infallible instincts to ensure that they asked no one to look any deeper.

Mark Steyn correctly suggests that politicians have rejected any notion of responsibility. They are in denial. Even unprecedented excess all-cause death rates do not prick their conscience. Like the American politicians and political pandits, they are busy trying to make it all go away by talking about anything but Covid.

Medical administrators, in their turn, have become so inured to death that excess cancers, cardiac events, and sudden deaths can be airily dismissed with a wave of the hand and some casual platitudes about difficult times and how hard everyone has worked. What is there to worry about?

The Government’s Pandemic Response Has Been to Close the Door to Public Debate

In August 2021, I was writing to public health experts and advisors, some of whom are named in today’s Stuff article, suggesting that the government institute a public health campaign based on improved diet and lifestyle. I was right about that; research has shown that better exercise, rest, a lighter diet, herbs, and vitamins would have improved Covid outcomes dramatically. It still could strengthen public health, but the government’s pandemic response has been to close the door to public debate, deny public access to information, and persecute concerned voices.

Frankly, there is a surreal air to parliament, the media, and the health service as if they have forgotten what their actual job description is. I suppose they are hoping that very soon, the public will be too concerned about the cost of living to bother much about how long we will all live. My best friend from university died a year ago today. I miss him, and his surviving family members do also.

Don’t worry though, as soon as they can get the next big contagion organised they will come roaring back. The potential profits, salaries, and high profile media attention are too mouth-watering to resist. And this time, they will be ready to lift off from the get go.

We have to speak up. The process of creating risky pathogens in leaky labs is still going on. This is the life and death issue of our times. We have to speak up clearly with the voice of sanity.

Be Silent No More!