Last week a school child died of a sudden medical event in New Zealand while running, and 12 thousand miles away, the 24 year old captain of a hurling team in Ireland collapsed mid game and died soon after.
The New Zealand school principal said:
This is absolutely tragic, it’s devastating. We’ve got very sad students and staff, and we are doing everything we can to support them.
In Ireland, the president called the death an “inestimable loss” to his loved ones and the local community. The Taoiseach (Irish PM) also expressed his sympathies, saying that he was “shocked and saddened” to hear about the hurler’s passing.
They join a very long and growing list of apparently healthy people, young and old, who have died suddenly and unexpectedly over the last 18 months.
Three years ago, this would have been unusual, and much commented upon, but today few are asking questions. The articles in Stuff and the BBC disappeared off the front pages within a very short time.
Are Authorities Exercising Their Right to Remain Silent on Sudden Deaths
There will be some medical explanation offered to bereaved parents. Legitimate privacy concerns will ensure that this is kept private. No doubt it will be agreed that they are tragic deaths, but possibly unavoidable, for which no one is at fault. The school principal says that she is doing everything she can. The Taoiseach professed himself shocked.
No one can point the finger here without information, but it is not possible to ignore a hard fact: sudden deaths are happening too many times, considerably more times than in the past, meanwhile the authorities appear to be exercising their right to remain silent.
Given accumulating evidence of vaccine harm, it might be a great relief to everyone in the medical profession, the media, and government if the pandemic simply whimpers to an end as appears to be happening in the UK leaving no questions answered and no apology required. But there is a question of justice.
The NZ Crimes Act, clause 155—Duty of persons doing dangerous acts—says:
Every one who undertakes…to administer…medical treatment, or to do any other lawful act, the doing of which is or may be dangerous to life, is under a legal duty to have and to use reasonable knowledge, skill, and care in doing any such act, and is criminally responsible for the consequences of omitting…to discharge that duty.
The emphasis is on knowledge and care. Was this always diligently exercised during the pandemic, or have the authorities sometimes looked the other way as new evidence came to light?
Repeated Exposure to Covid Spike Protein is Teaching the Immune System to Ignore the Spike Protein
This technical paper has had over 250,000 views. It suggests that repeated Covid vaccination has an effect similar to repeated injections designed to acclimatise a person with allergies to small quantities of the allergen (such as bee venom). Eventually, the immune system learns to ignore the venom and thus escapes the excessive and damaging immune system reaction to stings.
In the same way, repeated exposure to the Covid spike protein in vaccines is teaching the immune system to ignore the spike protein. The immune system no longer bothers to fight Covid off. Thereby boosters are not helping us to avoid Covid, they are leaving us more vulnerable to reinfection. The conclusion is that repeated boosters should be avoided.
I term the publication of a paper like this as: apology lite—boosters are not useful, but never mind it is not too bad—you’ll probably get over it as long as you stop taking the jabs.
Of course, even this sort of useful information is not passing through the hands of government, politicians of all parties, media, and medical administrators and onto the public. Given their high profile promotion of vaccines and mandates, it is possibly way too embarrassing for them.
Real and Serious Dangers Associated With Covid Vaccination
The real problem arises because this Science paper, and most Covid papers, seldom tell you that there are other real and serious dangers associated with Covid vaccination—that would be vaccine heresy and might result in censorship.
Risks that might and do result in illness and sometimes death. Health conditions that may never go away or even get worse, including potentially fatal increased incidence of blood clots, neurological conditions, heart disease, and cancers (according to 2021 US military data and US insurance data).
These appear to be contributing to record levels of all cause mortality affecting all ages.
The German government came clean two weeks ago and admitted the prevalence of health problems was significant, serious, and life changing, but they stopped short of pausing public vaccinations. That might have constituted an admission of guilt.
Are those in government, the media, and the medical profession referencing the full scope of science journal publishing? Are they keeping count of the unusual extent and character of health outcomes? If they admitted doing so, they might be forced to admit complicity in a crime. A crime of such unprecedented proportions that bids to defy belief.
Is any particular sudden death related to vaccination in any way? In many cases we don’t have sufficient information and therefore can’t speculate, but the number and circumstances of recent sudden death cases appears to be too high to ignore. Two weeks ago we reported the sudden death of six Canadian doctors.
Has the government contributed to a public health tragedy by failing to admit that there are serious risks from Covid vaccination for every age group and few if any measurable benefits for those under 50?
It appears there is a discussion to be had, if we are ever permitted to do so, and there may be a case to answer in a court of law where every aspect of the evidence can be presented and cross examined.
Our Covid-19 infection rate is declining, but the New Zealand Herald continues to stoke the fear factor.
They lead today with “Analysis: Covid-19 now one of NZ’s biggest killers” by ‘Science’ Reporter Jamie Morton. Statisticians are probably laughing into their coffee cups, and school teachers wondering whether to use it as an example of how to misuse statistics.
The Herald reports that Covid is causing 1 in 7 deaths (week ending July 17th). Their greatest fear is that we are becoming indifferent to the ‘dangers’.
Let’s fact check their figures:
The New Zealand Herald:“Fifteen per cent of people are dying from Covid-19, about the same proportion of people who die from ischaemic heart disease, which is currently our single biggest killer” [attributed to epidemiologist Michael Baker]
Fact Check:MISLEADING For people unfamiliar with statistics, this statement could be confounding case death rates with mortality data. Thereby making some naively think Covid is fatal for 15% of people. Less than 0.25% of Covid cases have been associated with a fatality within 28 days of testing over the entire course of the pandemic, and the majority of these deaths are not due to Covid (the Omicron rate is understood to be much lower than this). This is more than 60 times lower than the Herald article erroneously could be seen to convey, and btw heart disease is not our biggest killer, cancer kills more than twice as many people than heart disease. Cases of Covid are also believed to be greatly underreported, further lowering the case mortality rate. (See also the next item, the 15% figure relates to an unreliable Covid data snapshot, it does not mean 15% of the whole population or 15% of Covid cases. See here: Why Are People Falling Ill and Dying in Record Numbers?)
The New Zealand Herald:“For the first time, Covid-19 has probably become the leading cause of death in New Zealand”, [attributed to epidemiologist Michael Baker]
Fact Check:FALSE Causes of death are established over longer periods of time than the one week of data referred to by the Herald. Many deaths with Covid are reported over time and delayed. They are often being entered into government statistics in batches. This causes significant and misleading volatility in daily and weekly data. If you pick one week, as the Herald article has done, you can arrive at false conclusions. The absurdity of this can be established by going back to the Christchurch Mosque massacre. If that week’s data had been taken in isolation, the Herald could have announced terrorism as NZ’s leading cause of death.
The New Zealand Herald:“In two-thirds of cases [of death reported within 28 days of Covid infection], the virus was listed as the underlying cause [by MoH]”
Fact Check:MISLEADING Two-thirds of people dying with Covid are over 80 years old, but the life expectancy in New Zealand is 82 years. It is unlikely in this age range that Covid is the predominant cause of death; it is more likely that age and conditions associated with aging are major factors. As the Ministry of Health has not revealed how it is ‘adjusting’ Covid death data. The distribution of deaths by age should lead the Herald to ask questions about the latest Ministry of Health data adjustment.
The New Zealand Herald:“Our excess mortality has increased this year and is now running at 10 per cent above normal and likely to continue while we report daily Covid-19 deaths in the double digits.”
Fact Check: INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION Any analysis of the cause of our high rate of excess deaths will require information about cause of death by category and a comparison with previous years. Current New Zealand data of this type is not available, but overseas insurance data suggests that high rates of excess all cause mortality affecting working age people are not related to Covid.
The New Zealand Herald:“For those most vulnerable Kiwis, being boosted remained crucial, modeller Professor Plank said. It’s much, much better to get your immunity from a vaccine than from getting infected.”
Fact Check:FALSE Studies published recently have found that unvaccinated people have 97.3% long lasting protection from severe Covid following initial infection with any variant, whereas 25% of vaccinated people are vulnerable to reinfection with more severe outcomes. Detailed studies by the German government have found the rate of serious adverse effects from vaccination is somewhere in the range between 1 in 500 to 1 in 5000 vaccination doses. The likelihood of adverse effects increases with each dose and the immune protection decreases into negative territory within weeks of boosting. This suggests that repeated boosters are risky.
At this stage of the pandemic, the public doesn’t need misleading articles like this one. It needs reliable information closely connected to current science publishing and objective data collection.
Some of the research work concerning Covid and Covid vaccination is centered around understanding why the spike protein is toxic and exactly how it affects elements of physiological systems.
Some of the published papers involve complex investigation of physiological mechanisms with implications beyond the background of a lay person.
A paper published on 14 June 2022 in Cells journal examines lipid toxicity. Another paper published earlier on 3 May 2021 studied a possible effect of the spike protein causing excessive immunoreactivity of brain pericytes.
Lipids are a class of components including hormones, fats, oils, and waxes. They have multiple functions in our physiology, including serving as structural components of cell membranes, functioning as energy storehouses, and also performing work as important signaling molecules. Lipid breakdown and deficiency is associated with immune deficiency and aging (senescence).
Pericytes perform many functions, including regulation of cerebral blood flow, maintenance of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and control of vascular development and angiogenesis. Pericytes can also be involved in neuroinflammatory processes and possess stem cell-like properties. Pericytes deteriorate during the development of Alzheimer’s disease.
According to WMC, the collective action of the spike protein on lipids and pericytes can be causing oxidative stress to neurological structures and cellular systems. This, in turn, can trigger neurodegeneration and demyelination.
Myelin is the protective sheath around nerve cell pathways in the brain and spinal cord which allows electrical signals to be transmitted quickly and efficiently. Demyelination is associated with reduced speed of information processing (cognitive decline) and with diseases like autoimmune dysfunction, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS).
Other possible disease outcomes of these degenerative processes include stroke, seizures, dementia, cognitive dysfunction, chorea (involuntary movement disorder), migraine, and psychosis. Such effects are consistent with some of the observed pathologies of Covid infection and vaccination including neurological and cardiovascular effects.
WMC research speculates that the spike protein may, through successive mechanisms, trigger a rare but usually fatal progressive blood clotting disease known as Asherson’s Syndrome associated with persistent immune deficiency (a known outcome of repeated Covid vaccination).
It is important to note that the spike protein generated by mRNA Covid vaccination can cause these effects on its own without any Covid viral infection.
This sort of discussion and analysis of spike protein toxicity points to a need for specific research projects. WMC’s purpose in writing is to call for more research to investigate if and to what extent such mechanisms are playing a role in the known spike protein toxicity.
Overall this discussion illustrates that our current understanding of many crucial physiological processes is very preliminary and limited in scope. This in turn underlines once again the extreme dangers of the rushed introduction of novel mass biotechnology vaccination programmes designed to realign natural immune responses.
Government assurances of mRNA vaccination safety are remote from the actual continuing process of scientific assessment and debate. Such assurances are without solid foundation in scientific fact.
The government must become proactive in recognising potential dangers and acting quickly to mitigate contingent risks. This certainly means pausing the mRNA vaccination programme.
Professor Jeffrey Sachs has been chair of the COVID-19 commission for leading medical journal the Lancet. Through his investigations, Prof. Sachs has come to the conclusion that there is extremely dangerous biotechnology research being kept from public view.
Professor Sachs believes that “our lives are being put at risk”, while authorities and some research scientists with vested interests are blocking further assessment of biotech safety. Our government and newspapers are going along for the ride, promoting articles containing useless and misleading public assurances of safety.
The range of biotechnology experimentation has become huge. For example, read this article, Scientists Create World’s First ‘Synthetic Embryos, about a project which has created the world’s first synthetic embryos, bypassing the need for sperm, eggs, and fertilisation.
Our whole natural food system, with which we share a co-evolutionary relationship, is under threat from biotech synthetic foods which, like mRNA vaccines, are being presumed safe rather than tested for long term outcomes.
The sky’s the limit when it comes to food options, as the cannibalistic installation of steak grown from human cells at the Design Museum in London showed. It was intended to criticize the meat industry’s rising use of living cells from animals.
Are the Lessons of Mad Cow Disease Forgotten?
Engineered genetic material is the ultimate invasion force. Sufficiently similar to real food to enable it to cross protective barriers put there by evolution, but distinctly different and sufficiently novel to cause exotic disease with unimaginable consequences.
Professor Sachs is putting his career at risk by speaking out publicly. He joins a long list of eminent highly qualified physicians and scientists who are cancelled the minute they ask questions about the safety of novel biotechnology.
This week New Zealand newspaper Stuff casually reparroted the New Zealand government line that those entertaining the Wuhan lab leak theory were conspiracy theorists who were attempting to fracture our faith (yes, faith) in science.
Such drives to censor caution are being led by unqualified science explainers writing in MSM, by social media fact checkers driven by computer algorithms, and by government scientists and medical administrators keen to protect their reputations and professional standing.
The Coronavirus Pandemic is the Entree Into a Very Risky World
It highlights both the dangers that we face and the lengths biotech companies will go to in order to promote their investments and potential profits.
Professor Shmuel Shapira MD MPH, who led Israel’s efforts to develop a coronavirus vaccine, has been summarily deleted by no less a person than Twitter for suggesting that the monkey-pox epidemic might be related to Covid vaccination.
Professor Shapira has a CV that would put most scientists to shame. You can read his CV and some of his Twitter comments here, carefully saved for posterity by a substack blogger.
Comments such as: “What grade would you give to a vaccine that people are vaccinated with three times and get sick twice (as of today)? Not to mention significant side effects” are quite sufficient to attract the scrutiny of relentless bots tracking down vaccine heresy whatever the scientific credentials of its authors.
As Dr. Shapira points out, Israel has the dubious distinction of being the most vaccinated nation in the world along with the highest rate of Covid cases. In an obvious reference to the not too distant past, Shapira said of the Twitter censorship: “Each day I understand better where we live and in which year.”
Highly qualified scientists are asking questions around the world. Dr. Kenji Yamamoto of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okamura Memorial Hospital, Japan has written to Virology Journal outlining the alarming connection between mRNA vaccination and reduced immunity.
Vinay Prasad MD MPH is a hematologist-oncologist and Associate Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco.
The VKPrasad lab at UCSF, studies cancer drugs, health policy, clinical trials and better decision making. He is the author of over 350 academic articles. This week he bemoaned the current frenzy of poor Covid science reporting by tweeting:
“How many science ‘communicators’ are just bad at science? I can’t think of another field where the communicator class is so far from the actual field in question.”
US Republican Congressman Thomas Massie offered:
“Last time I checked. @factcheckdotorg’s vaccine fact check program was funded by an organization (@RWJF) that holds $2 billion dollars worth of vaccine manufacturer stock.”
An Incestuous Web of Public Relations Hype
I can understand how vaccine manufacturers and biotechnology companies have used their billions to weave an incestuous web of public relations hype, biased fact checkers, financial sponsorship, and stock market power in order to promote and protect their products, but how did they manage to completely hood wink governments as well? Their well oiled machine has a big reach.
There is among politicians a lack of mathematical and scientific depth that leaves them vulnerable to both the myopic interpretations of low grade science funded by vested interests and the somnambulant acceptance of pharmaceutical drug guidelines among tired medical policy makers. How is the trick worked?
Take the strange case of Israeli Covid data vs Palestinian Covid data raised by Dr. Clare Craig former UK NHS diagnostic pathologist. Israel has an almost 100% vaccination rate (plus boosters), 4.6 million cases, 11,400 deaths, and a population of 9.2 million.
Palestine has a vaccination rate of 40%, 600,000 cases, 5,368 deaths, and a population of 4.8 million. Both countries are adjacent and their populations mix though cross border employment.
As we reported earlier this week, both countries have an almost identical Covid death rate per 100,000 population, which led us to correctly conclude that mRNA vaccines do not make any difference to severe Covid infection outcomes (that is as long as you chose to ignore the severe adverse events associated with mRNA vaccination, as most governments do).
How would you spin that if you were a vaccine proponent? Easy. Divide deaths by cases. This shows Israel has a 0.25% case mortality rate, but poor old Palestine has a 0.9% mortality rate. Hey Presto. Vaccine public relations problem solved: mislead the government and the public by telling them mRNA vaccination reduces the death rate and hence severity of Covid.
But deaths/cases is not ‘a scientifically meaningful’ way to interpret these figures. Simply put, highly vaccinated Israel has had tons more cases per head of population. So the data actually illustrates that mRNA vaccination is associated with a higher vulnerability to infection, but does nothing to reduce the death rate per 100,000 population.
In other words, vaccinated people are more vulnerable to infection (and repeated infection) and not protected from severe outcomes, just as Prof. Shapira, the former head of the Israeli vaccination research programme, has pointed out on Twitter.
Unvaccinated People Are Well Protected
In contrast, unvaccinated people are well protected for the longer term following initial infection. This is a real scientific fact backed up by careful large scale studies using mathematically appropriate analysis, as seen in the following articles:
So this is one of the things that Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, our just resigned Director General of Health, was doing when he misleadingly said last week:
“…getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19. Very consistent with the international evidence.”
We should never forget that science is a process of data collection and analysis whose results are never so unequivocal as some politicians and health professionals would have us believe.
In this case, Dr. Bloomfield reduced a complex battery of information to a simple instruction aimed at the New Zealand public and our politicians: get boosted or face dire consequences. Yet even a high school science senior could detect and correct such a misuse of figures.
It is not hard to work out why he was still promoting mRNA vaccination right up to his retirement. Health systems around the world are locked into pharmaceutical orthodoxy. It has become not only routine to accept the safety assurances of drug companies, but heresy to question them.
it is a matter of life and death
What is at issue here is not an interesting discussion of the scientific method, it is a matter of life and death. A tragic drama that is being played out every day, while we are surrounded by paid opinion makers eager to guide us towards an uncaring sleep. We are sleepwalking to disaster to the tune of the march of the cash registers played by the massed bands of pharmaceutical profits.
As Dr. Shapira Tweeted on August 2nd:
“Myocarditis, fatal arrhythmias, 20% increase in strokes, facialis, Herpes Zoster, tinnitus (ear ringing), gynecological excessive bleeding, monkey-pox, obscured long term side effects. No worries. Be happy.”
This is the view from an acclaimed credentialled scientist in a highly vaccinated nation. New Zealand is also a highly vaccinated nation, but we don’t seem to have independent scientists concerned about scientific validity and public safety.
mRNA vaccination has caused a public health crisis whose extent is apparently being obscured by drug companies and a health elite working in tandem. Qualified scientists who ask questions concerning biotechnology safety are being cancelled, while tightly controlled media messages are urging populations to accept biotech revolutions in medicine and food.
Let me spell it out once again. We have a biotech vaccine that doesn’t reduce Covid infection, severe illness, or death. It causes serious (read: life changing) adverse effects at a rate at least 50 times higher than any previous vaccine.
In highly vaccinated populations, we have record rates of excess all cause mortality including among working age people, menstrual irregularities among 62% of women, depletion of sperm counts following vaccination, and reduced birth rates.
Pull the Other One; It Has Bells on It
The Hon. Andrew Little, Minister of Health, is telling us there is no crisis in our health service beyond a temporary shortage of staff and the need for more people to boost. Pull the other one, it has bells on it. We urgently need a government that is willing to admit dire mistakes, apologise, and correct them.
mRNA vaccination has given us a glimpse through a window into a dystopian biotech future. We need to wake up before it is too late and pause risky biotechnology experimentation. That includes pausing mRNA vaccination programmes now. The lives of our near and dear ones are at issue, the future health and longevity of the nation is at stake.
Excess all-cause mortality in New Zealand is running at record levels. About 100 people are dying each day in New Zealand (pop. 5 million).
A few times during the last couple of months, we have asked a key question: what are people dying of?
Ministry of Health data records that about 7 people are dying each day with Covid, but only about a maximum of 3 of these per day because of Covid. That is just 3% of deaths.
Occupancy of ICU beds with Covid hovers around 3-5%. Therefore it is not Covid that is overwhelming our hospitals, so what is?
The Ministry of Health and mainstream media have been talking vaguely about a bad flu season, but a quick check of the FluTracking website reveals that the 2022 flu season is not even as bad as 2019.
My plumber called in on a job last week and complained about staff falling ill continuously. Sick leave among teachers is up by 80%. The newspapers are also reporting kiwi businesses are closing because of staff shortages exacerbated by ‘winter illness’, but as the incidence flu is not that high what could be going on?
An in depth article in Stuff this morning contains an important hint:
Te Whatu Ora Taranaki hospital emergency department clinical nurse manager Therese Manning said, while there had not been much change to the number of presentations to ED in the last five years, the acuity of the patients is higher.
“This means we are seeing patients presenting with more severe illnesses and injuries…So there are more patients that need to be seen within 10 minutes of arriving….This demonstrates patients are more unwell and therefore likely to stay in hospital longer”.
Acute presentations at ED are increasing, but what are they ill with? We aren’t being told and may never be if our health czars are allowed to continue to deny access to information.
This week it has been widely reported (correctly) that six Canadian doctors died suddenly (at least three of them immediately after receiving their mandatory 4th shot), but hospitals refused to release the cause of death or vaccination status citing privacy concerns.
I don’t know if you have noticed, but stories about sudden death incidents seem to have dropped off the MSM radar.
Three years ago a sudden unexplained death might have made the headlines, but today if they are reported at all, they only remain on the visible online page for a very short time. You might have missed this one.
Yet as the Taranaki Hospital ED data and the all cause mortality data reveal:
acute illness and sudden death are at an all time high. Life insurance data from the USA paints a similar picture.
So have our newspapers ceased to care or are they, like the hospitals and emergency services, too inundated to cope? Having heavily promoted mRNA vaccination for eighteen months, are they too embarrassed to ask questions?
Not Everyone is Keeping Silent
Professor Shmuel C. Shapira, long time Head of the Israeli Institute of Biological Research, has been speaking out about the failure of the Israeli mRNA Pfizer vaccination programme, describing it as a house of cards about to come tumbling down that will bury us all. He tweeted:
“I am not against vaccines, I am against stupidity, false science and management that is not professional and ignores matters-of-fact.”
Dr. Clare Craig, former UK NHS diagnostic pathologist, is also raising her voice. Speaking on GB news she analysed the official German Government data. This shows that 1 in every 5,000 doses causes a serious reaction to Covid vaccines, but it doesn’t stop there.
The German government is never one to shrink from data collection, so they also conducted a survey of more than half a million vaccine recipients and found that 1 in 500 reported a serious reaction after an mRNA dose (more than ten times the underreported official count).
If you are worried that lightly affected Germans are inflating the figures, stop worrying. The definition of a serious adverse reaction requires that a person be hospitalised or suffer a permanently life changing event.
Dr. Craig invited us to step back from the modelling and government guidance about efficacy and safety and consider that Covid data from around the world does not show that mRNA vaccination leads to any reduction in deaths. Most illustrative are comparisons between comparable countries with high and low vaccination rates.
For example Israel with close to 100% vaccinated (and most boosted with four doses) compared to Palestine with just 40% double vaccinated. Israel has 1,204 Covid related deaths per million population and Palestine 1,182 deaths per million population roughly the same. It becomes apparent that mRNA vaccination does not reduce the Covid death rate.
Just remember that analysis of Covid death data does not include rising all-cause deaths unrelated to Covid infection, the evidence points to reduced immunity as a result of mRNA vaccination.
Dr. Craig reported that the general public in the UK are voting with their feet and failing to come in for boosters (and they are stopping bringing in their children for this dangerous jab). Aren’t we all in sympathy? We are waiting for our doctors to speak up and our courts to do the math.
The Long Read: Is mRNA vaccination affecting our psychology? If so, how and to what extent? What can we do about it?
The police and other ‘experts’ in New Zealand are complaining that digital ‘deep fake’ tools pose a threat to our justice system. A rendering of Jacinda Ardern with a modified hairstyle is used as an example.
Meanwhile, mathematician Igor Chudov, has reported that California has joined Germany, Hungary, Taiwan, UK, and Sweden in registering a large drop in the birth rate. Read his report here.
So we have the highest rate of excess all cause mortality in the world. Our hospital system is overwhelmed. Birth rates are dropping around the world. Suicide, mental illness and violent crime is rising precipitously. The global economy is floundering. But our police are worried that someone might use their computer to make a realistic cartoon of the prime minister doing something out of character. Am I missing something here?
Yesterday a dear friend who has been helping people in New Zealand injured by the Pfizer mRNA vaccine sent me a 476 page document containing thousands of short personal accounts of vaccine injury and death.
Am I surprised that the police, like those in Uvalde Texas, have initiated no action? Rather they are anxious to close a ‘loophole’ in the law that allows people to play with their computers, but look the other way if people die suddenly and unexpectedly in large numbers.
Has the Response to the Pandemic Changed the Way We Think?
The pandemic has highlighted huge gaps in our understanding of human consciousness. We have moved rapidly and far into an era of social polarisation, which is more representative of a prelude to social conflict than a health crisis. Curiously missing is a sense of human compassion.
In the animal kingdom biting and stinging without remorse is to be expected, but we did not expect ethical considerations to be cast aside in a similar brutal fashion in our human world.
There is no doubt that the refusal to countenance moral imperatives has become deep set and entrenched during the pandemic.
In the face of mounting evidence of harm, most governments, health professionals, vaccine proponents, and commercial interests have stuck to their guns and refused to take real world data seriously.
Respected scientists asking serious questions have been ignored and cancelled.
One of the hallmarks of the heights of human sensibility is the capacity to balance the individual and the social interest with compassion.
Heroes like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi led their long oppressed nations to freedom through years of forbearance and fortitude, which blossomed into forgiveness and understanding at the time of victory.
Our modern day leaders are rushing to cast aside hard won freedoms and rights in the service of blatantly commercial causes and overt prejudice. Nor do they shrink from promoting groundless fear and stress.
I am not alone in wondering whether Covid vaccines damage higher human functions. The capacity for moral reasoning, compassion, justice, inference, transcendence, and intuition, which mark out the high points of the human species, appears to be diminished at this time.
Anyone who is engaged in a dialogue with the authorities or publishing on the net will tell you that principles of rational thought and evidence are no longer the deciding arbiters of public truth. There is virtually nothing that qualifies as an open scientific debate taking place.
On a number of occasions pandemic commentator Steve Kirsh has offered huge financial incentives and bets, as much as $1 million, to set up publicly moderated debates, but there have been no takers.
The Structure of Human Consciousness
The origins of both human reasoning and compassion do not lie in a single gene or even a small collection of genes. They are supported by the collective functioning of the whole physiology. They find their counterpart in the balance or homeostasis of the physiology and in the operation of the immune system which protects the integrity of the physiology.
It is already well understood that drugs have both a physiological and a psychological impact, the alteration of the genetic and epigenetic basis of the physiology through genetic vaccines will not prove an exception to this rule, but will likely prove to have a more serious effect on mental disposition.
To begin to apprehend how our consciousness and physiology interact, it is necessary to investigate those traditions of knowledge which aim to understand personal consciousness. Among them is Yoga which is not a belief system, it comprises a set of practices which generate experiences sufficient to verify its philosophy.
Yoga along with many other cultural traditions expounds an underlying unity of life. It defines four forms of speech.
Everyday verbal speech and mental dialogue (or thinking) are the first two.
More subtle is the power of desire and the capacity to fulfill it.
The ultimate level of speech is referred to as ‘para’ which arises from a unity with nature in its broadest sense, something that the practice of Yoga seeks to awaken.
It amounts to our most private yet universal Self, an almost silent level of speech, a state of knowingness and pure potentiality. We will refer to this as the least excited or ground state of consciousness.
Some physical analogies might help to clarify how consciousness functions. Four levels of speech, may be said to be parallel to four states of matter: gas, liquid, solid and macroscopic quantum coherent states.
Everyday gossip is sometimes described as ‘hot air’, a gas.
Internal dialogue and monologue is more substantial and fluid like a liquid.
Our fundamental forces of desire and drive are even more substantial, persistent, and solid.
The ground state of consciousness can be likened to coherent states of matter analogous to those found in a super conductor. In coherent states of matter, individual atoms merge together in a quantum state of coordination and collectively gain access to seemingly impossible abilities like frictionless flow.
Consciousness is absolutely the fundamental of the human condition. It is also well established that consciousness plays a pivotal role in physical theory.
The evolution of quantum states is very instructive. Quantum states evolve as an abstract wave function—a superposition of all possible states in a virtual Hilbert space—until an intervention of consciousness, a measurement, takes place and the wave function collapses into a definite physical state.
In a sense, the ground state of consciousness operates as the quantum field of all possibilities. Poets have reported the most settled state of mind as a connection to the intelligence of nature.
Familiarity with that state of unity is said to give rise to the spontaneous expression of that which is useful in the moment. For example William Wordsworth wrote:
“….that blessed mood,
In which the burthen of the mystery,
In which the heavy and the weary weight
Of all this unintelligible world,
Is lightened:—that serene and blessed mood,
In which the affections gently lead us on,—
Until, the breath of this corporeal frame
And even the motion of our human blood
Almost suspended, we are laid asleep
In body, and become a living soul:
While with an eye made quiet by the power
Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,
We see into the life of things….”
Consciousness and Matter
Many physicists have suggested that the most unified level of physical reality is in fact consciousness itself, in its pure, universal, or unified state.
Many spiritual practices have measurable and repeatable effects particularly including meditations, which can have a normalising impact on a very broad range of physiological functions such as blood pressure, improved immune function, and reduced incidence of disease. In addition, there are measurable psychological effects.
I examine and reference a great many of these in my book Your DNA Diet. I was able to locate over 250 published studies of meditation which support positive effects on 45 key measures of ‘Quality of Life’ identified by health economists in the fields of physiology, psychology, and behaviour.
The psychological effects include reduced anxiety and stress, increased intelligence, field independence, optimisation of the brain, capacity for moral reasoning, improved concentration, emotional stability, improved memory, and reduced anger and depression.
My point here is that not just health, but also a balanced state of mind depends on a very balanced state of the WHOLE physiology. Damage or limit the inherent balanced, reflective, and flexible functioning of the physiology and the immune system, as mRNA vaccines apparently do, and potentially you are damaging your capacity to think clearly.
How Does the Ground State of Our Consciousness Guide Life?
The immune system has access to stored memories of past illness and pathogens, and a library of successful strategies. Many immune memories are inherited. But the invasion of novel pathogens and toxins (a process that modern living has accelerated) launches a systematic search for a fix.
The immune system has set patterns, but in its search for a cure, it also draws upon a highly creative process that must of necessity interface with all the time and distance scales of natural law including the least excited quantum level of life—a virtual superposition of all possible states.
Most successful immune responses are uniquely paired with the pathogen or toxin they are seeking to eliminate. Some, if not most, immune responses involve learning to live with the pathogen whilst simultaneously keeping it in check.
Thus the connection with the abstract quantum level of life, which is also the underlying universal field of consciousness, could be considered to be an essential element of the development of immune responses.
The parallels with our own experiences of consciousness should be apparent. We have characteristic patterns of speech, thought, and fundamental desires. Every so often we need to change gear to meet novel challenges and situations. We are hard wired via our physiology into the most settled state of consciousness—a creative field of all possibilities.
Our intellect, our memories, and our emotions are enriched through this connection which is a driving force of evolution for individuals and through them society at large.
The ground state of our existence is sometimes described as a rock, an anchor through the twists and turns of life. It is that quiet centre of life that we all sense as our substance, our Self.
Our intimate connection with the universal is what protects us and drives us forward. Saints such as Francis of Assisi are recorded as experiencing universal compassion for mankind and nature.
Our connection with and access to the universal level of consciousness depends on the orderly functioning of our whole physiology.
In What Sense Has the Pandemic Changed Our Psychology?
There is one characteristic of the psychology of those administering the pandemic, or one pointedly following the official advice, that is very obvious to the independent observer—reduced capacity to change direction, to change gear, to take account of situations outside the scope of previous usage.
Many commentators have discussed this. Some suggest that it may be the result of a deliberate plan to reset the world economy, others a result of mass formation—a sort of collective mind imposed by saturation propaganda.
There are reasons to support each of these ideas but also reasons to doubt they form the whole story. One problematic aspect of the psychological characteristics of the pandemic is their sudden onset. One week our Prime Minister was telling us she would never force anyone to vaccinate. Within days she enforced coercive vaccination mandates.
Clearly, whole populations are not all co-conspirators seeking to reset the global economy, nor do they appear to have a personal interest in doing so, yet they are mostly compliant.
Our suggestion is that this could be due at least in part to the effect of genetic vaccines which limit the normal flexible pathways of the immune system. This may loosen our connection with our inner Self, and lead us to rely instead on more inflexible conceptions and behaviours.
Are There Other Parallel Examples of Cognitive Impairment?
From a conventional physiological perspective, what could be going on? One possible model can be sought in Parkinson’s disease which is known to cause cognitive impairment in its later stages.
One cause is a drop in the level of dopamine, the neurotransmitter that is involved in regulating the body’s movements. Scientists investigating Parkinsons are looking at changes in two other chemical messengers — acetylcholine and norepinephrine — as possible additional causes of memory and executive function loss.
Areas most often affected include:
Difficulty with complex tasks that require a person with Parkinsons to maintain or shift their attention
Difficulties in generating, maintaining, shifting and blending different ideas and concepts.
The analogy with Parkinsons is only partially helpful. The cognitive impairment involved takes years to develop, whereas the reported cognitive effects of mRNA vaccination such as brain fog and inflexibility can appear immediately.
mRNA vaccination potentially interferes with the genetic command and control system that controls neurotransmitters. This could explain why specific neural pathways could be directly switched off and instantly affected by Covid vaccination.
The effect of mRNA vaccination on these pathways has not yet been the subject of any research. Thus we don’t know how long such effects, if they exist, will last or how many people they affect. Nor do we know how to reverse any psychological impairment.
Where Will This End?
This discussion has been speculative, pushing the boundaries of what we know and suspect.
It seems clear that trials of mRNA vaccines should have included assessments of cognitive effects and alterations in neural pathways, but then again, if established protocols had been followed, mRNA vaccine trials should have been abandoned when the first deaths subsequent to vaccination were recorded.
This didn’t happen. That in itself is a red flag indicating cognitive impairment.
We are in the middle of a global economic crisis during which corporations are making massive profits, at the expense of affordability.
Thereby they are pushing populations into poverty which will ultimately damage their own corporate affairs.
Health administrators cannot take rational account of real world health data if it contradicts their set ideas, even if it points to mass ill health.
Civilisations which lose their capacity to act rationally, inevitably fail. This is the challenge that the pandemic has thrown up—how do we correct the mistakes that are being made? We will have to dig deep to achieve that.
It is probable that the pathway out of the pandemic, aside from the cessation of risky biotechnology experimentation, should actually involve a process of rediscovering traditions of cultural knowledge and approaches to health which, in the headlong rush of modern living, we have carelessly forgotten or cast aside.
Thankfully this week the German Hospital Federation called for a cessation in the compulsory Covid vaccination programme for health staff because data shows it is endangering health.
New Zealanders received a text message offering them $100, a sausage sizzle, and a Mister Whippy ice cream if they came in for another shot. This is the kind of cognitive dissonance we are still facing.
The BBC has announced “compelling evidence” that Covid originated in the Wuhan seafood and wildlife market.
Among scientists, this announcement is causing some laughter.
There has been a great deal of prior scientific debate on this subject which has left us in limbo. Principally because the Chinese blocked the possibility of independent investigation and access to data.
Certainly, China, and incidentally, the US National Institute of Health (NIH), have a high interest in repressing any conclusion that Covid originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Infectious Diseases (WIV) which is adjacent to the Wuhan wet market.
After all, WIV was definitely doing recombinant DNA gain of function research on coronaviruses jointly funded by NIH and the Chinese government. If you want it spelled out with two barrells go here.
The BBC article regaled us with a chart of supposed early cases of Covid clustered around the wet market. The first problem with the BBC picture is that the locations of WIV were not shown. They are adjacent and close to the wet market, as Igor Chudov has illustrated (we have added them in RED).
Secondly the actual number, location, and date of early cases is a matter of considerable dispute. The WHO data used in the paper quoted by the BBC was supplied by Chinese authorities and has not been independently verifiable. Weibo data also quoted in the paper is from a later date.
But even if we accept the highly unlikely proposition that the official Chinese data is complete, accurate, and untainted by the authorities, the third problem is that the blue dots (the majority) are cases that have no known connection to the wet market.
Until now, location and origin ambiguity has been a telling argument to question any conclusion that Covid-19 came from the wet market (not to speak of the fact that no species carrying a coronavirus with a genetic makeup sufficiently similar to Covid-19 has been found in Wuhan or nearby or far away for that matter.)
The BBC announced that this problem had been solved by a second paper which suggests that the virus jumped from some unknown animal via an intermediate host (possibly Racoons, quaint furry creatures who sometimes catch a cold) in the SE corner of the market to humans not once but twice at two different times involving two different variants of Covid.
Although animals harbour a great many viruses which could potentially spill over into human populations, the crossover of new types such as Marburg disease or Ebola is a comparatively rare event and in most cases the host animal is identified relatively quickly. This is not the case with Covid-19.
Therefore the suggestion that two distinct variants spilled over in roughly the same place within a short time span from an unidentified animal could be classified as an “ad hoc” suggestion designed to patch up a failing theory.
There are other explanations for the possible early appearance of two phylogenetically related variants of Covid-19 discussed in the second paper referenced by the BBC.
For example some credible accounts have pointed to a laboratory escape (or deliberate release) earlier than November 2019 leaving sufficient time for the highly unstable Covid-19 to mutate.
During periods of uncertainty, scientists from opposing camps fight it out in the journals based on experiments and competing theoretical models.
For example the concept of the ether, an invisible substance which pervaded space, was eventually rejected as a result of Einstein’s theory of relativity and its experimental confirmation, but not before reams of ingenious counter arguments were published by scientists anxious to retain the ether concept.
Much the same occurred to defend the notion that space was made of crystal, until Gallielo saw through his telescope the moons of Jupiter travelling freely through the supposedly solid crystalline structure of space.
It is quite legitimate for the authors of the two papers cited by the BBC to publish their observations and speculations about Covid-19 origins. That is a normal process in science. When facts and conclusions are in dispute there is usually a flurry of publishing presenting arguments and counter arguments.
But why did the BBC and their science correspondent Victoria Gill choose to present them to the public as compelling evidence which should end the debate, but omit to depict the location of WIV or discuss the counter arguments?
It is an interesting mystery, but one I think, dear readers, you might be able to solve quite readily. I leave it to you.
Incomprehensible Pronouncements in the Course of a Scientific Revolution
Which brings me to another case of incomprehensible pronouncements in the course of a scientific revolution. Our Director General of Health, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, is retiring from the field of battle.
Dr. Bloomfield has been an unremitting proponent of mRNA vaccination and a person who has gone further even than Pfizer in establishing strict criteria to deny exemptions.
Dr. Bloomfield’s final message to New Zealand was a bombshell:
“To better track the risk factors of dying from covid-19 we’ve done some preliminary analysis….It shows convincingly, here in Aotearoa, that getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19. Very consistent with the international evidence. Across the population, people not fully vaccinated against Covid-19, that is; they’ve had less than 2 doses, are 6 times more likely to die if they catch covid-19, compared with someone who has had at least one booster dose. That’s once you adjust for all other factors [my emphasis]. Now, for people under sixty, this risk [of dying if you catch covid-19] is even higher; more than 13 times greater for those who are unvaccinated or less than two doses.”
The key phrase here is ‘once you adjust for all the other factors’.
Dr. Bloomfield didn’t let on what this adjustment involved.
The Boosted Currently Have the Highest Rate of Death
We have been tracking the official daily Covid death toll for months, and it is absolutely clear that the boosted currently have the highest rate of death per 100,000 within 28 days of testing positive for Covid.
This is contrary to what Dr. Bloomfield asserted and much higher than the unvaccinated and the double jabbed. Yet he managed to spin the officially higher mortality among the boosted into a giant health advantage for them by a factor of 6 compared to the unvaccinated population, and 13 (???) for the under 60s. This is not credible and cannot be reasonably asserted without explanation.
We note that the Ministry of Health has exempted its employees under 30 years of age from receiving boosters because of the high rate of adverse reactions in this age group. So what is going on here? Are boosters safe?
The Ministry of Health has decided somehow, without telling us how, that a great many boosted people are not dying ‘because of Covid’, but merely ‘with Covid’.
Hence they have been excluded from the statistics of Covid deaths. You and I can’t really dispute this, because Dr. Bloomfield didn’t give any details of how his gerrymandering Ministry of Health backroom boys have done this.
I did just receive a response to a similar question asked of the Minister of Health Andrew Little a few weeks ago—the minister has noted my concerns and forwarded my correspondence to the Ministry of Health. So he also didn’t say what the boosted are dying of.
New Zealand Has the Highest Rate of Excess All Cause Mortality in the World
One World Data reported last week New Zealand has the highest rate of excess all cause mortality in the world, but the Minister either doesn’t know or doesn’t want anyone to know why.
And just in case we might find out, Dr. Bloomfield has conveniently doctored the data.
Fortunately for us sleuths, the already announced official historical count of deaths cannot be easily altered—the boosted have a higher rate of death than the double jabbed and the unvaccinated. So what are they dying of?
Might I suggest Dr. Watson (sorry, Bloomfield) that the only thing that distinguishes the boosted group from any other group by definition is that they have received more mRNA jabs.
It isn’t a very big step to the conclusion that the boosted must be dying at a greater rate, not because of Covid, but because they are vaccinated.
Boosters are not safe, they are killing us.
As Dr. Bloomfield has resigned from his job and leaves us today for an unknown destination, we may never be able to ask him how he adjusts the data.
We may never be able to ask him why he refused to grant mRNA vaccine exemptions to people injured by the first shot.
We may never be able to ask him why he thinks overseas Covid-19 data points ‘convincingly’ to the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccination, but we do know there are very few if any, credible independent researchers left who agree with him.
Through countless Covid-19 press conferences, Dr. Bloomfield has been rolled out as one source of truth for the NZ public, fully endorsed by Jacinda Ardern. He has left us with a message that will seriously harm many more people unless its is corrected.
Dr. Bloomfield has sought yet again to inflame the public against the run of facts and against the unvaccinated. Just step out from under his shadow and peruse the pages of a published scientific article such as this one.
If you do, you might feel the need to treat Dr. Bloomfield’s recurring advice to get boosted again and again with a great deal of caution. Naked authority by itself does not amount to truth.
… and give us a glimpse into their enforcement methods.
Last week the government called for mask wearing to be enforced in New Zealand schools. Many schools have apparently decided to punish students who do not wear masks.
Asked whether she was happy that schools punished students who did not wear masks, Ardern ducked the question, denied the mandate, passed the buck, and still managed to appear happy for students to be punished. Ardern said:
“We are really open minded on this issue [???]. We in fact went back multiple times to education and health and said that ‘look if you believe we should bring that mask mandate back we are happy to do that. Whatever you think is going to be in the best interest of our learners, our schools, and our health outcomes’. They came back to us and said we should strongly encourage their use but we should still allow schools to implement the policies themselves. That’s where we have landed….We have not said mask wearing is compulsory, but we are strongly encouraging it.”
Watch the full interview here. There is plenty of spin but not a lot of ambiguity. Principals have been given a green light to dust off the detention book.
Some schools are giving students detention either during lunchtime or after school (the modern equivalent of writing out “I will wear my mask” a thousand times) which translates into loss of opportunities to participate in extracurricular activities and sports.
This should be unacceptable and is certainly deleterious to a student at any age and may result in them becoming alienated or adversely affected emotionally or socially.
Students go to school to learn and understand the process of verifying knowledge, to engage socially, and to further develop skills in communication; whereby they may debate and agree or disagree with one another, without the fear of being punished or discriminated against.
There is a considerable body of scientific evidence pointing to the ineffectiveness of masks to stop transmission. Longterm mask use also poses health risks and causes significant learning deficits.
Some parents, and hence their children, will be well aware of this.
A policy of punishment for non mask wearers, is the antithesis of a constructive learning environment and teaches, ‘comply without question or face a penalty.’
School attendance in New Zealand is already at an all time low. As a result of this, it is only going to fall further. The opportunities for constructive debate are fast disappearing in education and we can understand why many parents are turning their thoughts to homeschooling and homeschooling communities.
The problem here in New Zealand is that the general public is being deliberately kept in the dark about the ineffectiveness of masks and the dangers of prolonged mask wearing.
Most are following government advice thinking that they are protecting themselves and others from Covid. They are ending the day with a headache and a sore face, but sure that they have thereby saved the world.
A Glimpse Into Their Enforcement Methods
So far, the government has kept a tight hold on the Covid narrative by warning people that alternative news sources and social media conversations are full of misinformation, whilst government announcements are closely following ‘the science’.
They also give cash grants to MSM and advertise to the point of saturation.
That is all set to ramp up from today. The government has concluded a formal binding agreement with Meta (FB and Instagram), TikTok, Google (Gmail and YouTube), Amazon (Spark) and Twitter to limit the availability of harmful content including misinformation and disinformation in New Zealand.
In a world first, the code is described as ‘voluntary’, but it also includes a ‘commitment’ to being held ‘accountable’ which allows its provisions to be ‘enforced’.
How is that for doublespeak? And who is deciding what is harmful?
The mask mandate rules and the information censorship have something in common. The government is asking others to do their dirty work and then asking us to believe it has nothing to do with them. We are not naive, we already know how this works.
The agreement cleverly conflates things that we all feel should be controled such as child sexual exploitation and incitement to violence with rational discussions about drug safety and effectiveness.
YouTube has previously withdrawn Covid content from view at the private request of the Ministry of Health. Apparently, this can happen if any content causes the New Zealand government embarrassment.
I don’t suppose it has escaped your notice that internet censorship is a tool of oppressive governments. The dangers are becoming all too obvious in New Zealand, where the majority of the general public, who are subjected to saturation government advertising, still believe that regular mRNA boosters and flu shots offer protection for life that is stronger than natural immunity.
This is all taking on a macabre aspect as official Covid data here and in the EU is showing that boosted individuals are increasingly more likely to die with Covid than the unvaccinated are.
The apparent reluctance on the part of the government to engage with the implications of this official Covid data is seriously worrying. Governments traditionally have a general duty of care when it comes to policing public health measures.
This year has been one of the wettest on record. As a result, ants are coming into homes in record numbers, and you may have been struck with how expendable ant populations are.
Ant colonies appear to have a centralised administrative policy whereby any number of workers can be put at risk in the search for homes and food for queens.
A sort of ‘group think’ which starkly contrasts with human ethics wherein the individual is highly valued.
Here in New Zealand, we are 90% mRNA vaccinated and we currently have the highest rate of all cause mortality in the world. Even the Ministry of Health has admitted this is not because of Covid.
Yet if you follow the government advertising and press statements you will probably be unaware of this and happily sure that ‘the science’ is being followed.
I don’t need to draw conclusions for you here. If you are following the current Covid science journal publishing you will be well aware of mathematical arguments entirely based on collected data which are taking place within a rational framework. Ignoring or hiding these is dangerous.
Co-authored: Guy Hatchard Ph.D. and Narayani Hatchard
