At this point in the Covid pandemic saga, the public is still faced with an information blackout.

The data is very concerning indeed, but no one in parliament or MSM wants to get in front of it. Instead many are still stuck stoking the fear factor. As Prof. Vinay Prasad, an American hematologist-oncologist and health researcher, wrote today: Legitimising irrational anxiety is bad medicine.

Early on in our efforts to publicise the dangers of biotechnology medicine, Guy had an email exchange with Jesse Mulligan, popular commentator with RNZ Afternoons. Jesse’s perspective on Covid vaccination was as follows:

Dec 6th 2021 “I feel like anybody aiming to critique such an obviously positive public health measure should begin and end their messaging reminding people that any risks/flaws in the vaccine are minor compared to the horrific impacts of getting Covid….I don’t have the time to correspond with you on this at length but, for what it’s worth, if you’re putting people off getting a largely safe vaccine by what you’re writing about it, I think you need to review how you approach writing these messages.”

Dec 7th 2021 “It’s not your caution I object to but the predictable effect it has in putting people off the vaccine…..I’d say you have the choice whether to use this data to educate and question (which I am keen on) vs lining it up to try and convince people they should fear or think twice about getting the vaccine.”

Jesse quoted from Ministry of Health directives and had also read some questioning scientific articles, but he could not get past the conclusion that vaccination was an obvious public good and for this reason, he declined to have Guy on air.

The ‘obvious public good’ narrative has come in for some recent criticism. The BMJ printed an opinion piece in July entitled “Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?“. Or try this referenced substack article which reports that the negative harm/benefit ratio in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine trials has been acknowledged in a scientific journal article. In other words, there is more harm than benefit.

We wonder what is Jesse’s assessment of current evidence? He is on our mailing list, but the correspondence has only been one way since Dec 7th.

An Underlying Assumption That Biotech Medicine Interventions Are Safe

For us, the central early point of pandemic misinformation has been the underlying assumption that biotech medicine interventions could be safe.

There really was little or no evidence to justify such an attitude, in fact, as we have discussed, there was a great deal of published pre-pandemic evidence to justify caution. It seems to me that Jesse and most other MSM pandits were probably under-informed on this point.

Given the central role of DNA in human physiology, altering its function was from the outset potentially catastrophic. We are now facing Covid vaccine outcomes that not only involve serious individual adverse effects but also potentially affect whole populations in the longer term. These outcomes include:

• Elevated excess all-cause death rates and lowered longevity
• Lowered birth rates and fertility

The evidence for these is patchy because governments are not rushing to publish data, but it is still very convincing. So concerning in fact, that the Israeli government has covered up key data and scientific conclusions.

The latest comprehensive evidence for Covid vaccine induced excess all cause mortality can be found in a just published analysis: Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022.

Sudden Deaths Among All Ages are Being Normalised

It is extraordinary how this perilous new normal has found its way into advertising messages, but not into serious commentary. Today we watched a TV ad for a funeral home which arranges alternative and appropriate funerals for those dying young, whilst a British Heart Foundation appeal featured a young woman collapsing on the football field. It did so in order to encourage donations.

Sudden deaths among all ages are being normalised in the public’s mind because they really are happening at a rate that dwarfs the past, as insurance data confirms. However here in New Zealand, we are still being subjected to puerile government advertising devoid of scientific caution. Like this MoH promotion which turned up this morning:

GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER—I’ve had three shots, do I really need another booster? Current evidence shows your protection against severe infection slowly decreases over time—GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER

No mention of safety, no mention of efficacy, and the term ‘current evidence’ is bandied about inappropriately as if this advert is scientifically up to date and reliable. It isn’t

So why has it become so unfashionable to be concerned about rising death rates and lowered birth rates? You might find a clue in this frightening pre-pandemic article from the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Corporation “Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care spending: Report”. Are higher death rates good news for people with this kind of perspective? We hope not.

Are we being too harsh? No. This involves the health and life of young people on the doorstep of a bright future.

In the Uncertain Covid Climate of Fear

When teaching, kindness and understanding go a long way towards improving communication and successful learning. We are clearly on a learning curve here. The poor vaccination outcomes were never anticipated, the adverse effects were initially disbelieved on principle, and blamed on misinformation.

We can understand that, in the uncertain Covid climate of fear, people took sides and trusted the official Ministry of Health narrative, but continuing to do so now doesn’t fit the published scientific narrative or the public data. Caution was and is a very scientific strategy, it never deserved bad press.

We’re reaching out here. Those offering advice to the public need to be more discerning if they wish to contribute to the well being and longevity of our society. MSM language has become extreme, and it is increasingly polarising without a foundation in science.

The sad reality is that medicine is a very conservative profession. Most medical procedures are locked in during training and seldom challenged for years after. Biotechnology interventions lie outside of the boundaries of past medical practice. What we need to do without anger, politics, or extremism is to talk through the fear of Covid and discuss the risks of biotechnology.

There is still a chance for seasoned journalists to cover the pandemic with an open mind. It is happening elsewhere. GB News for example has gained one of the largest prime time news audiences in the UK. Why not initiate a more open public debate? Cooling rhetoric and decreasing polarisation can only lead to better outcomes. Fresh air never harms anyone, it can save lives.

Co-Authors: Guy Hatchard and Narayani Hatchard

What are the wider implications for personal health, pandemic policy and mitigation strategies?

For some time there have been anecdotal reports circulating concerning the appearance and formation of unusual rubbery blood clots which have been detected in Covid vaccinated individuals who have died.

Some embalmers, pathologists, and funeral home directors have noted extensive white proteinous fibrous structures blocking arteries, unique in their experience, which may have played a role in the etiology and pathology of fatal illness.

If you have been following the issue, you will have seen photographs and/or videos of these structures like this short video from a concerned British funeral home owner, or you might have heard senior US pathologist Dr Ryan Cole discuss the phenomenon.

This issue is contentious and the subject of sceptical comment from some quarters, but the record number of unexplained deaths, even among the young, and the relentless and reckless promotion of mRNA vaccines points to a need for closer investigation.

Dr Jessica Rose, a postdoc biochemist, who blogs on Substack and podcasts on Audible, has released a probing scientific analysis of the possible causes of this widely recognised clotting phenomenon under the title “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to haemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?”. This article is both highly technical and partly speculative, but it is worth extracting some of the take home warnings and conclusions.

First of all note that this is the kind of precautionary post trial analysis that was omitted by Pfizer and others as they rushed mRNA vaccines to market. The reason behind 10 year approval cycles for previous vaccines is precisely because unexpected effects in the vaccine research field are the norm rather than the exception. The introduction of biotech jabs should have raised red flags about the short trial time frames, but it didn’t.

Dr Rose examines the possibility that the Covid mRNA vaccination causes haemolysis (rupture of red blood cells) releasing massive amounts of haemoglobin. And then asks: does the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, trigger misfolding of the haemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots and oxygen incapacity?

In other words, does the spike protein have prion-like properties that are causing chain clotting reactions (including microclots) which can cause death? Dr Rose thinks the answer to this question is a ‘YES’ and calls for more research to investigate the phenomenon.

Prions are pathogens that cause disease because of their misfolded shape rather than their biology. Misfolded proteins do not function like their correctly folded cousins and they are associated with neuro-degenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Prions can transform or ‘teach’ other proteins to misfold. It’s not really teaching as much as the disallowance of proper folding in adjacent proteins which then spreads further.

Disease-causing prions can resist proteolysis – the process which under normal conditions removes misfolded proteins. Protected from correction, prions can initiate an autocatalytic chain reaction which forms alien obstructive structures in the physiology. In Mad Cow Disease for example a prion chain reaction progressively replaces healthy structures in the brain.

Dr Rose outlines a plausible chain of events in the blood along with supporting evidence from VAERS data. According to Dr Rose, the reported incidence of porphyria, a rare disease normally caused by genetic defects, has increased in VAERS data by 17,265% when compared to years prior to the introduction of mRNA vaccination.

Porphyrins play a key role in the chain of reactions that produce haemoglobin. Porphyria is an accumulation of porphyrins in the liver or bone marrow due to defects in the porphyrin development pathway.

In addition to a wide range of severe physical and mental symptoms, porphyria can be associated with haemoglobin instability. Rupture of red blood cells is a necessary precondition for the release of unstable haemoglobin proteins susceptible to misfolding.

The increased incidence of porphyria raises another important safety issue which has consistently dogged the introduction of new drugs, vaccines, and even novel food ingredients. There is often an underlying assumption that chemical, physiological, biological, or genetic components perform single functions in isolation. This is invariably incorrect. Most have multiple roles. Altering one function, in the hope of correcting a single imbalance, can affect a whole range of other systems and outcomes.

Acute porphyria, in addition to physical symptomatology such as abdominal pain, has a psychiatric manifestations include hysteria, anxiety, depression, phobias, psychosis, organic disorders, agitation, delirium, and altered consciousness ranging from somnolence to coma. Some patients develop psychosis similar to schizophrenia. All of these effects come down to a dysfunction in physical red blood cell formation.

As we have discussed previously, psychological effects of genetic and epigenetic interventions including mRNA vaccines remains a largely unexplored field, but not one where safety can be assumed a priori. Yet that is precisely what has happened. Absence of evidence (since no one has looked for or measured effects) is not evidence of absence.

There is currently a lot of Covid hysteria, anxiety, agitation, and even phobia without much of a scientific or rational basis especially when you sit back and examine current Covid science publishing and data.

In summary, a whole range of naive safety assumptions have dogged the roll out of mRNA technology, and we have not yet adequately assessed the final outcomes of mRNA serious adverse effects.

Dr Rose raises a number of questions that require more investigation. Importantly, she urges extreme caution concluding:

“Everyone needs to know why it’s essential not to introduce potential agents to disrupt the haemoglobin forming and clotting pathways [as the spike protein induced by mRNA vaccination does]. There are so many ways that things can go wrong. Which, is again, why I don’t understand why there are so many exceedingly arrogant humans who think it’s a good idea to mess with biology [using biotechnology].”

At the Hatchard Report we have already written about the persistence of the spike protein for months after mRNA vaccination and its capacity to accumulate in diverse organ systems. For this reason, it is clear that mRNA vaccine induced clotting can potentially affect all our organ systems in diverse areas of the physiology. The extent of this effect varies from individual to individual. There are currently inadequate procedures in the New Zealand health system to monitor such effects post vaccination or post mortem in order to investigate their extent more closely.

We started out by considering the causes of fibrous proteinous blood clots among the vaccinated, but by taking a wider angle of consideration we have realised that genetic interventions can threaten the holistic stability of life including even mental stability. Genetic structures connect mind and body.

All-cause mortality has surged to unprecedented levels around the world initiating the sharpest fall in longevity in 100 years. There is really only one sensible course of action—an energetic multidisciplinary approach to assess the range of adverse effects of human genetic intervention. The effort should be aimed squarely at pausing biotech and finding mitigating health strategies. This will require open minds. Successful mitigation will have to identify, include, and encourage proven dietary and lifestyle initiatives. Carrying on with present policies regardless is not an option.

Which only leads us back to our very own incautious blinkered government, health advisors, and administrators who this week ramped up the advertising budget yet again to encourage second boosters for everyone and a fifth shot for those with immune deficiencies; completely ignoring accumulating evidence that mRNA vaccination itself causes immune deficiency, while boosters are associated with increased all-cause mortality.

Our government has also launched a new advertising campaign praising the recent closure of District Health Boards and the introduction of centralised control of medicine. According to the advertising campaign, there are now more opportunities for contactless virtual medical consultations. In other words, you don’t need to meet a doctor in person, you can get your medical help directly from…who?? Hopefully it’s not the central government.

The UK government recommends against offering the Pfizer Covid mRNA vaccine for pregnant women, those who might suspect that they could be pregnant, and anyone who is breastfeeding.

A carefully nuanced statement within a document entitled “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” (the latest revised version released on 16th August 2022) says:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.…Women of childbearing potential….are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time..”

The report concludes there never was any safety data for pregnant or lactating mothers and blames the rush to get everyone vaccinated for the lack of caution and incorrect safety advice previously offered by the government.

Here in distant New Zealand, which has been deliberately isolated from international information by our government, we are still being subjected to government advertising and MSM promotional articles advising that it is recommended for pregnant people (??) to take the experimental mRNA biotech shot including boosters.

In contrast to the UK government, pregnant mothers are advised that there are no safety issues or uncertainties.

Yet our all-cause mortality is running at 35% above the long term average.

Rising all cause Deaths are Related to Booster Uptake

The UK government has thereby provided an answer to just one question among the many that remain unanswered. Prominent substack writer Steve Kirsh lists 23 unanswered questions about the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines.

Over the last many months, Mr. Kirsh has offered large sums of money to any vaccine-advocating scientists who will debate these questions with him. There have been no takers.

Among the 23 questions, the prize goes to the gathering dark shadow of rising all cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries across the globe. Mathematician Igor Chudov has given mathematical and statistical validity to what is obvious if you look at graphs of all-cause mortality.

His linear regression of publicly available official death data from 29 countries, calculates an ironclad statistical relationship between booster rates and deaths (p= 0.0002 or 99.98% certainty). In other words, boosters and deaths go together like bread and butter. The statistical details are linked here.

The refusal to publicly debate safety despite mounting and overwhelming evidence of related deaths, marks vaccine advocates as aspiring members of a ruling elite who believe themselves above accountability, ethics, and human rights.

Curiously if any among their number changes sides and entertains counter safety data, they are cast aside. Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Mobeen Syed, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John Campbell, and many, many others started out their public commentaries strongly in favour of Covid vaccination. They are all vaccinated. Now they are all very publicly raising alarm bells about safety, but refer any vaccine advocate to their work (if you can) and these responsible doctors are rejected as unreliable (no reasons given).

How Have the Covid Ruling Elites Formed?

Ruling elites rely on enforcement of power structures and supremacy myths. They are often members of a single ethnic, professional or political group. They exclude and persecute those raising questioning or dissenting voices.

Such groups can attract narcissistic personalities and psychopaths (a serious personality disorder characterized by antisocial behavior, untruthfulness, irresponsibility, and lack of remorse or empathy) to join their ranks. Among ruling elites there is little room for debate or rationality.

The 4 C’s—careerism, conformism, coercion, and corruption are very busy around the world propping up the Covid vaccine safety narrative against evidence that has now become overwhelming.

In New Zealand, we are writing the book on suppression of information in order to save the reputation and protect the pockets of our ruling elites. To achieve this, the health of pregnant women and their unborn children, as well as the longevity of the population, including the very young, appear to have been judged expendable.

The use of CRISPR-Cas9 to edit genes was thrust into the spotlight ten years ago in 2012 when George Church, Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and Feng Zhang harnessed it as a tool to modify targeted regions of genomes.

A discovery that earned Doudna and Charpentier a Nobel prize. Given its potential to revolutionize gene editing, Science magazine named CRISPR Breakthrough of the Year in 2015.

Biotech PR went into high gear announcing that an era of precise, safe gene editing and biotech therapy had arrived, promising better crops and livestock, as well as the faultless cure of diseases and genetic defects.

By 2017, it had become apparent that problems were surfacing. Multiple scientists were raising red flags. A summary in New Scientist 18 July 2018 headlined “CRISPR gene editing is not quite as precise and as safe as thought”.

A study of CRISPR by Allan Bradley of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the UK and others found that in animal and human cell CRISPR experiments around a fifth of cells showed unexpected deletions or rearrangements more than 100 DNA letters long. These surprising changes are sometimes thousands of letters long.

Bradley noted some groups were developing treatments that would involve using genetic techniques to edit billions of cells inside the human body (sound familiar?). There’s a chance that a few of these cells might turn cancerous, he said:

“There’s a risk of causing cancer sometime in a patient’s lifetime. We need to understand more before rushing into human clinical trials.”

A paper published in Cell in 2020 examining CRISPR’s possible use on human embryos found that in more than half of the cases, the editing caused unintended changes, such as loss of an entire chromosome or big chunks of it—sufficient to cause life ending medical conditions.

The general conclusion was that editing of genetic and epigenetic systems carries risks of unintended consequences, and that genetic mobility and rearrangement of genetic sequences is a common outcome. Great caution was advised

Come the pandemic panic of January 2020 and the consequent loosening of the already inadequate safety protocols surrounding genetic experimentation. There followed the warp speed approval of barely tested mRNA vaccines. Then there was the pressure on governments:

Giving evidence to Parliament in May 2021, Dominic Cummings, chief advisor to Boris Johnson, said:

‘The conventional wisdom was that we were not going to be able to have any vaccines in 2020. In March, I started getting calls from various people saying, “These new MRNA vaccines could well smash the conventional wisdom, and don’t necessarily stick to it.” – People like Bill Gates and that kind of network were saying that.’

There was no mention of mainstream scientific caution about biotech safety. The potential profits were mouth-watering. The introduction of gene therapy-based vaccines to billions of people, without any necessity to warn them of the well known risks, was all set to roll.

18 months on the situation has become apocalyptic:

• All cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries worldwide are rising far in excess of pre-pandemic levels.
• VAERS data shows that cancer incidence is rocketing.
• ‘Unknown cause of death’ has become the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada.
• In other places, doctors are just guessing at causes of sudden death on death certificates.
• Insurance claims among working age people are rising steeply.
• Funeral homes are working at 30% or more above pre-pandemic levels.
• In the rare cases where autopsies are performed, also noticed by embalmers, strange white proteinous self-assembling masses in arteries are implicated in blood clot formation.
• Athletic youngsters and aging champions alike are falling ill and dying

You might think that there would be pause for thought, but you would be wrong. Government authorities are so far down the track, that it is proving difficult if not impossible to turn around. Instead they are doubling down.

• In Queensland teachers who didn’t vaccinate are facing compulsory pay cuts.
• An Australian journalist asking questions about pandemic policy was refused entry to New Zealand due to his “character.”
• Two New Zealand journalists had their house raided, computers seized and were arrested for suggesting that some vaccine proponents might have committed criminal offences.
• Ten police turned up at a doorstep to arrest a lady who attended the peaceful parliament protest 6 months ago (ten police to one woman?).
• Pro-vaccine funded scientists are busy misrepresenting Covid data to reassure the public that there is nothing out of the ordinary and recommending more coercive vaccine and mask mandates.
• In the UK and other highly vaccinated countries bivalent mRNA vaccines have been approved in the absence of safety data.
• In Canada the courts have ruled that it is not unconstitutional to deny access to life saving health services to the unvaccinated.

Just reflect for a moment that the predatory commercial arm of the biotech industry has achieved a sought after goal:

• Risky experiments on human populations have been normalised,
• Generously funded by governments,
• Granted indemnity from prosecution,
• Supported by trusted media outlets.
• Acceptable rates of adverse effects have been raised by 5000%
• Doctors, medical professionals, and administrators have been generously paid or coerced into compliance.
• The public has been thoroughly indoctrinated by a paid propaganda blitz.
• Probing questions are cancelled by social media.

It is open season for biotech shots and no one involved in the gravy train is going to give that up without a fight. Dozens of new biotech vaccines are in the development pipeline, all hoping to cash in on the tsunami of death.

The battle lines have been drawn. On the one side vested interests with deep pockets, the modern medical establishment, and governments seeking ultimate control over personal choice, are urging on the majority of highly vaccinated people whose health is deteriorating rapidly but whose belief in final vaccine victory remains undimmed.

On the other hand, small bands of cautious unvaccinated individuals, rational scientists, and alternative media have their health, but are facing unprecedented criticism and cancellation. They have been labelled violent fascists determined to undermine democracy.

No one recalls or references the well known severe risks of biotech interventions which are detailed in multiple reputable journals pre-pandemic.

No one in authority will reference any current publishing that raises red flags. Instead they are blindly intent on making everyone comply with Covid vaccination policies and presumably in the near future with more novel biotech vaccines covering a wide range of illnesses.

For centuries it has been held that free will is what distinguishes us from animals, take that away and what are we left with?

The publication and analysis of damning official data from the UK, Israel, and all points of the compass (see here and here) has established that Covid vaccination is driving adverse effects and all-cause deaths on an unprecedented scale.

Suddenly a few officials are offering apologies. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Director of the US CDC, told us last week that they had got their pandemic response wrong.

The adverse effects and death data is so definitive that lawyers are warning officials to change tack or face prosecution. A law firm in Australia has warned AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Authority) that they were breaking the law when they forbade doctors and other health professionals from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables.

Even Google owned YouTube is quietly changing its censorship policy. You are now allowed to post a video asserting that masks don’t work, previously your work would have been deleted. However, a school in mask-loving California called the police when a four year old took off his mask and refused to put it back on. He was taken home by the police and excluded from school for a week.

In the UK, the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation) advised the government to approve the new bivalent Moderna mRNA Covid vaccine. What were they thinking? They did so without adequate safety data, apparently on the basis that we have done it once and got away with it, so why not have another go? View a list of guilty JCVI members here.

An article in the Washington Post entitled “Your first brush with coronavirus could affect how a booster works” reprinted in Stuff illustrates just how far scientists are willing to go in order to retain their options to experiment on the general population.

The nuanced discussion claims that mRNA vaccines were initially spectacularly successful (???), but concedes that they no longer work because of immune system imprinting (aka original antigenic sin), and even goes as far as admitting they almost certainly won’t work in future.

Even so, it quotes scientists urging the development and use of revamped mRNA technology including bivalent vaccines, nasal vaccines, vaccines at birth, and vaccines tailored to individuals (none of which according to the article are likely to work very well, if at all).

Crucially the article makes no mention of adverse effects of RNA vaccination or rising excess all-cause deaths, instead scientists argue that the pandemic response has not worked but has been overall “a good thing”—an oxymoron. They must be really worried about the longevity of their research grants, but not so worried about the longevity of the world’s population.

The most memorable quote from the article is in the last sentence: Christian Gaebler, an assistant professor of clinical investigation at the Rockefeller University says:

“If someone says they fully understood this, they would be lying.”

Here in little New Zealand the penny has not yet dropped among the general public. Why would it? Over 90% of the population are Pfizer vaccinated and the unvaccinated have been publicly designated (by all political parties, the government, MSM, and academia) as terrorists determined to make the country ungovernable. Any public u-turn would be immensely embarrassing.

New Zealand has become party-central for government overreach. Herd-immunity, adverse effects of mRNA vaccination, and lab-leak theories have all been officially labelled by a government funded research institution as baseless conspiracy theories. MSM have elevated the charge to treason.

All three of these concepts are the subject of copious academic publishing and debate. Excluding them from public discussion or labelling them as false amounts to an attempt to subvert the scientific process. A couple of days ago Brett Sutton, Chief Medical Officer of the Australian state of Victoria, tweeted that the lab leak theory was proven false beyond doubt. He doesn’t appear to be following science publishing.

See for example this analysis which argues that recently published studies advocating a zoonotic origin of Covid-19 suffered from ascertainment bias. In other words, their case sampling concentrated around the Wuhan Seafood Market because scientists assumed from the outset that it must have begun there. As a result they omitted to cast a wider sampling net which might have disproved the theory. Statistically equivalent to asking only train drivers if they liked railways, then concluding that all people like railways.

From this point, any politician, media outlet, or health professional who continues to claim the universal safety and effectiveness of Covid vaccination and its applicability for the young has either neglected to inform themselves or they are being willfully misleading.

Anyone who casually blames climate change, holiday heart syndrome, or a host of other excuses for the rising rate of all cause deaths is not only barking up the wrong tree, but they are also confusing the public and obstructing the course of justice.

I am surprised New Zealand media reprinted the Washington Post article, it doesn’t fit with their prior publishing, but then again maybe the tide is beginning to turn even here. We are still waiting for a public discussion offering honest and complete information about risks in a form that can be readily understood.

Formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet