Yesterday, the Ministry of Health completely revised its presentation of Covid-19 statistics in order to “better inform the New Zealand public.”

This initially caused a bit of consternation, but on close examination some laughter among statistically competent people. It seems that Ministry of Health is, by accident rather than intention, making the case for the unvaccinated. The statistics bear close examination.

Up until now we have had a long series of Covid-19 data for infections, hospitalisations, and deaths based on the consistent criteria provided by test results. This has enabled us to track the long term trends. These are very clear.

Over the last four months the vaccinated are becoming progressively more vulnerable to testing positive for Covid before or during hospitalisation (red line) while the unvaccinated are becoming less vulnerable (blue line).

The unvaccinated have been gradually making up a smaller and smaller proportion of cases, hospitalisations and deaths. This is probably due to the growth of natural immunity due to prior infection.

In contrast, as the effect of mRNA inoculation wanes, the vaccinated have been making up a larger proportion than their relative numbers suggest they should. This may also be due to immune deficiency caused by the vaccine although this is not yet clear from the limited New Zealand figures available.

Although the Ministry of Health data, provided up until now, has deficiencies (for example related to who is categorised as vaccinated—a person is not categorised as vaccinated until 7 days after receiving the shot), the data forms a consistent series and thus the trends are objectively reliable.

The most recent 7 day average reveals that the vaccinated make up a larger percentage of hospitalisations than their percentage of the population. In other words, they are more vulnerable to Covid than the unvaccinated who make up a smaller percentage of the hospital admissions than their relative population size.

Newly Revised Ministry of Health Data is Not Scientifically Credible

Yesterday the Ministry of Health abruptly adjusted their Covid data (including some historical figures) by a huge amount as follows:

The first thing to note is that these figures are incompatible with the previous figures. From today it will no longer be possible to gauge historical trends. This is because the method of counting Covid cases has changed.

Technically speaking there is a structural break in the data. The change in reporting is no longer based solely on the objective results of tests.

Cases have been reclassified by Ministry of Health clinicians and administrators according to criteria which have not been fully revealed. These involve subjective judgements.

According to the Ministry of Health many individuals are in hospital for other conditions and their Covid diagnosis is therefore irrelevant, so these people have now been excluded from Covid statistics.

The Ministry of Health says these revised figures are intended to give the public a better picture of the actual impact of Covid. Happily for the Ministry of Health, the Covid hospitalisation figures for the vaccinated have been adjusted downwards by very large percentages, while those for the unvaccinated have been adjusted down by only small percentages.

Before yesterday’s changes, the unvaccinated or ineligible formed 21.5% of the population but only 17.5% of the hospitalisations, they have now been recategorised and form 33.4% of hospitalisations.

According to the Ministry of Health this shows that the vaccine is working very well. We imagine there must be big sighs of relief at the Ministry of Health along with much back slapping and sipping of champagne all round.

Are the New Ministry of Health Figures Believable?

Firstly some of the adjustments are very extreme and inexplicable. The number of Covid patients reported to be in ICU rose from 205 to 305 in the space of two days.

Similarly, the huge jump among the under twelves in hospital because of Covid, up by 16% in two days are not credible. Further analysis throws up many more doubts about their reliability.

But let’s leave aside for the moment our doubts about the objectivity of the new Ministry of Health adjustments; let’s say we believe them to be a reliable picture of Covid (which we don’t).

The real information that the Ministry of Health is providing here with these new figures is actually far more startling and concerning than any face value reduction in Covid case loads.

It is the reverse side of the coin that is so revealing, and what they don’t say that is so important. Our question is:

Why are there so many vaccinated people in hospitals? If they are not there for Covid as the Ministry of Health now claims, why are they hospitalized and what is wrong with them?

Two days ago One News reported that all cause mortality in New Zealand has reached record levels in 2022, higher than any historical levels. We have been reporting extensively on this based on our assessment of official data.

A couple of weeks ago, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield wrote to me and said there is no excess all-cause mortality in New Zealand. He was wrong, and now even One News has had the courage to correct him.

Key Data is Being Withheld by the Ministry of Health.

They are not telling us why hospitalisations are increasing. Is it for cardiac conditions, strokes, cancers, or what? They are keeping mum. Why?

In contrast to the latest Ministry of Health gerrymandering of data, overseas researchers and some media are moving ahead of curve:

June 6 2022 CBS News reported:

“As COVID-19 cases began to accelerate again this spring, federal data suggests the rate of breakthrough COVID infections in April was worse in boosted Americans compared to unboosted Americans …”

Analysis of Pfizer’s pediatric vaccine trial results by mathematician and substack blogger Igor Chudov reveals the mRNA shots raise rather than lower the risk of reinfection (meaning catching COVID more than once).

US pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole and many others are reporting rises in a number of health conditions, including cancers, most notably cancers of the uterus, endometrial cancers, and very aggressive blood and brain cancers.

The Hatchard Report has already written extensively on official US life insurance company data showing that all cause mortality is rising at an unprecedented and alarming rate (as high as 163%) among working age Americans.

Data from the US Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) is showing dramatic increases in medical visits for cancers and a range of other conditions post-jab.

Immune Deficiency is Immune Memory Loss

As many prominent scientists have pointed out, rising hospital case loads point to immune deficiency as a consequence of mRNA vaccination.

This could be the cause of excess all-cause mortality in New Zealand, but we cannot at this point decide definitively because the data on individual conditions is being withheld and possibly obfuscated by the Ministry of Health.

I and many others have requested this data without success.

There is another way to describe immune deficiency that will perhaps help you understand what is at stake—“loss of immune memory.”

Our immunity is not just made up of our responses to childhood illnesses. Much if not most of our immunity arises from ancestral experiences of illnesses.

Immunity is in large part a gift of successful evolutionary responses to historical illnesses which are then stored in our DNA. Our DNA is a treasure trove of ancestral health gifts.

mRNA vaccines are reprogramming the epigenetic responses and functions of our immune system. By doing so, are they also wiping out part of our inherited immunity?

Are mRNA vaccines subtracting the genetic wisdom of our ancestors and substituting the hurried inventions of some people working at warp speed in a biotech lab?

If this is true, and the indications so far point strongly in this direction, I need hardly add that this is not only dangerous but potentially life-ending and species-threatening over the longer term.

Note the Canadian government announced yesterday that mRNA vaccination will be required at regular intervals into the distant future.

What do Record Levels of All-cause Mortality in New Zealand and Overseas Imply?

Let’s not beat around the bush here—only one conclusion can be reached—longevity is decreasing for the first time in hundreds of years (with the exception of world war one and two).

We are going to be living shorter lives and the data released yesterday by the Ministry of Health tells us that this is not due to Covid.

If it is not due to Covid, what is it due to?

Epidemiologist Dr. Michael Baker, who writes prolifically for the popular press, told us a few days ago it must be due to a combination of Covid and flu, but he hasn’t got the data to back this up.

Like us, he is hobbled by the lack of non-Covid official health data. He is making a convenient stab in the dark—telling us to round up the usual suspects.

From my statistical perspective, evidence is quietly mounting that mRNA Covid vaccination is the real culprit.

Government Policy Makers are Being Kept in the Dark

The tragedy here is that MPs of all parties and many government policy makers are also being kept in the dark.

This week an MP meeting a constituent, who brought Covid data newly published in peer-reviewed journals to their attention, rebuffed their representation with the handy excuse that the Ministry of Health can’t be wrong.

The MP cited her own Ph.D. in an unrelated academic discipline and chided the constituent for falling down a rabbit hole.

Since when are international peer-reviewed scientific journals rabbit holes?

Are we being expected to ignore the science of the rest of the world?

Just how uninformed, naive, and closed-minded are our current MPs?

In 2023 you should be able to cast your vote at the ballot box, but then again who is left to vote for who isn’t asleep at the wheel?

Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, the medical establishment, and unicorns.

A couple of days ago I received a conciliatory reply from Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, our soon-to-resign Director General of Health.

Dr. Bloomfield agreed to submit some recently published scientific findings I had sent him to his “Science and Insights team to review it as part of their ongoing review of emerging data and evidence on COVID-19 and on vaccines.”

In another respect, Dr. Bloomfield differed from my analysis stating categorically “there are no ‘elevated rates of all-cause mortality’ in New Zealand” I wrote back begging to differ and stating my case from my statistical perspective.

I believe the statistical data we are currently seeing qualify as ‘unicorns’—they are so far from previous norms that they should raise red flags (I have discussed these in numerous articles including here and here and here and here).

So who is right?

An Entirely Unfamiliar Situation with Devastating Consequences

When I was growing up in law biding and generally safe post-war Britain, there was a sensational crime known as the A6 murder.

A couple out romancing in their Morris Minor car stopped at a field off the road. At some point a very nervous masked man carrying a gun appeared and ordered the couple to drive him around.

After a six hour ordeal, he impulsively shot the driver and later also the man’s partner whom he left for dead. She survived and a manhunt ensued which gripped the nation and hogged the headlines for weeks.

Eventually, James Hanratty was arrested and convicted. The evidence against him was very thin. He went to the gallows protesting his innocence.

There followed forty years of calls for inquiries and pardons supported by celebrities like John Lennon and Yoko Ono, but in 2002 DNA analysis proved that Hanratty was actually guilty.

Hanratty was a small-time thief, the A6 event was the first time he had been known to carry a gun. The girl’s account showed that he didn’t know how to handle a holdup, several times he asked them not to talk to him while he tried to think it through.

Hanratty was in an entirely unfamiliar situation and failed to act rationally. His eventual panic would have devastating consequences.

A Completely Novel and Risky Approach

As the pandemic started back in late 2019, scientists, medical experts, and governments also found themselves in a novel situation whose final outcome was unknown to them.

They were going to have to make up their response as events unfolded.

At first, they feared the worst and acted accordingly with lockdowns and talk of mass casualties. Then they fell back onto familiar territory when the word ‘vaccine’ came to their rescue, but this was no ordinary vaccine, it involved the mass inoculation of billions of people with genetically active material.

This was a completely novel approach which animal studies had already shown to be very risky. Just like Hanratty and his gun, they were using something with which they were entirely unfamiliar and for which they were unprepared.

The rate of adverse events reported following mRNA vaccination really is a unicorn.

It very quickly became apparent that it was running at more than 50 times that of any previous vaccine—a statistical anomaly so huge that it should have raised red flags.

The government and the medical establishment knew this, but they needed time to think it through. Time that they didn’t have.

They decided without any confirming data that the notion of a ‘vaccine’ was a sufficient guarantee of ultimate safety.

A member of the Skegg Committee advising the government wrote to me in August 2021 saying that although the vaccine was possibly a primitive first attempt and admittedly did not live up to expectations, he was sure they would get it right in the end.

The stage was set and the die was cast.

Statistically Inconceivable Rate of Deaths Not Related to Covid Infection

Nearly a year later alarming data is being published. Working age people in the USA enrolled in group insurance plans are dying at rates never seen before and it is not related to Covid infection.

The latest figures from Lincoln National reveal a 163% increase in 2021. This is not just unusual, this is statistically inconceivable. It is a unicorn event.

Inoculated US army personnel are also suffering unprecedented rates of cardiac problems and other conditions. Professional sportsmen including young people are falling ill on the field at rates never seen before. Something has gone terribly wrong.

Just like Hanratty protesting his innocence to the grave, medical authorities, governments, and the media who endorsed the mRNA vaccines will apparently do anything but admit their fault.

Pharmaceutical companies who stand to profit for years to come have been trying to hide or obfuscate data.

Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)

The latest excuse is called Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS). SADS is not actually an illness but an acronym invented to describe the fate of people who die suddenly.

The recent use of the term as if it were a known transmissible illness covers up the association between the Covid vaccines and the unprecedented mortality statistics.

(Watch legal philosopher Eva Vlaardingerbroek connect the dots on GB News explaining why so many healthy young people are falling sick or dying unexpectedly—it’s due to Covid vaccination).

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

An article in Stuff newspaper this afternoon reports a case of a year 10 sport-loving student diagnosed with the rare Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) who is unfortunately in an induced coma.

GBS is a known complication following mRNA vaccination which we have previously reported, but the Stuff article does not mention this association.

This is a measure of the confusion that has now enveloped pandemic policy.

Governments and so-called medical experts are grasping at straws and inventing excuses.

As the hours wore on for Hanratty, driven round and round through the night in the cramped Morris Minor, he became increasingly desperate and dangerous. Things were not working out in the way he had perhaps hoped.

Immune Deficiencies and Increased Vulnerability to Disease

Our problem runs deeper than anyone in authority has admitted to date.

mRNA vaccination is designed to reprogram immune system responses, inadvertently limiting its capacity to respond flexibly to other pathogens.

This leaves some vaccine recipients with immune deficiencies and increased vulnerability to disease (the NZ government today announced new more frequent Covid testing regimes in response to rising rates of Covid reinfection).

Lowered immunity could certainly be contributing to poor Covid infection outcomes and serious adverse events, but it may also possibly lead to a resurgence in new variants of deadly diseases thought to have vanished for good such as smallpox and polio.

These diseases and many other deadly pathogens were eradicated primarily because of advances in hygiene and nutrition during the twentieth century.

Their incidence was steeply declining before universal vaccination was introduced. Greatly improved nutrition and hygiene enhanced the capacity of our immune system response.

If immunity declines, as appears to be the case at present, incidence of these diseases may re-emerge.

Genetic Material is Incredibly Invasive and Mobile

Like the bee in the popular Netflix series Man vs Bee, genetic material is very difficult to contain.

On November 13 2020 the World Health Organisation granted emergency use to a novel oral polio vaccine developed by the Gates Foundation.

The vaccine is designed to treat type 2 vaccine-derived poliovirus—the same type of polio just identified in the UK’s first polio outbreak in 40 years.

The Wuhan Virology Laboratory had been experimenting with monkeypox virus prior to the current global outbreak.

With the proliferation of biotechnology labs investigating deadly pathogens like smallpox and polio (something that was occurring even before the pandemic) accidents are bound to happen.

Along with the decrease in immune system function due to mRNA vaccination, government support for biotech may have created a perfect storm of vulnerability to disease.

Cool Heads and Precautionary Policies are Required

Fortunately there are signs that some scientists are taking the hippocratic oath to do no harm more seriously.

An article by a Japanese scientist in Virology Journal June 5th 2022 is an example of the precautionary approach that is now being called for by a number of well qualified researchers.

Biotechnology labs including clandestine bioweapons programmes are deadly breeding grounds for novel illnesses which will inevitably escape.

If they are not controlled and risky research paused, we could all be in for even more serious unicorn events in the coming years. Genetic organisms and alterations cannot be withdrawn like faulty consumer products, they are out there for good.

Let us hope that, unlike in Hanratty’s case, it doesn’t take forty years for the truth to be recognised. Cool heads and precautionary policies are required.

There needs to be a willingness to admit mistakes and consider the obvious deficiencies and risks of current policies.

We don’t need inflexible approaches or jumpy fingers pulling triggers.

We don’t need to drive blindly out into the night.

Nor do we need unconvincing claims that there is nothing to worry about.

Eventually governments will have to act to limit biotechnology experimentation, it is only a matter of time until the penny drops.

Jacinda Ardern, who has escaped the continuing restrictions in New Zealand to visit Europe and speak at NATO, has met with her counterparts in France and Spain to suggest a global alliance to combat disinformation.

Ardern spoke to them about the New Zealand capital grounds riot and played to her gullible audience by suggesting the threat to social cohesion and public health in New Zealand society was originating in Russia and might result in war.

Ardern has had talks with President Macron which reportedly included disinformation. I am not sure that the events in Wellington would have qualified as a riot in France.

There were no Molotov cocktails of the kind you see in the frequent French protests, mostly people were playing music, engaging in conversations, and enjoying camping out, whilst standing up for their rights—something legally allowed in New Zealand.

I suspect that Macron probably relied on Ardern as his ‘one source of truth’ when it came to descriptions of New Zealand riots (??).

How is it possible that our lame duck prime minister can swan about in the military circles of Europe making outrageous claims about New Zealand society without being challenged by our press?

Quite the reverse, Stuff newspaper seemed to enjoy reporting Ardern’s sensational characterisations of NZ protests.

It seems to me that many of the world’s current leaders are busy winding each other up with more and more outrageous exaggerations which only serve to up the fear factor among themselves.

They are victims of disinformation, but it appears to be of their own making—acting like villagers rushing about in a panic when someone shouts out ‘snake’ when they have only seen a rope.

In such a panicked atmosphere, it is hard to strike up a rational conversation with our politicians. All parties have firmly closed the door to two-way communication with their constituents on pandemic policy.

Public Information has Become Carefully-crafted, Government-Approved Sound Bites

Public information has become limited to a succession of carefully-crafted, government-approved sound bites, which fade rapidly together into an aggregation of false interpretations and assumptions which inevitably take root in our social psyche.

We are daily schooled to be afraid. We are in the middle of a pandemic (??), which is clearly now milder than flu, promoting a vaccine (??) that doesn’t work and causes severe adverse effects.

We are religiously trained to wear masks that studies show don’t work, and whose constant use is proven to cause headaches and respiratory defects. Our every move is being tracked by Apps that collect our personal data that can and are being misused.

For almost a year now I have been writing at the HatchardReport.com long format refutations of disinformation being promoted by our government.

One Official Source of Disinformation

I have consistently referenced my work to published scientific work in learned journals. Unfortunately, solid information in the modern age has become fleeting and quickly forgotten.

No sooner have you shot down one canard such as the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines (they are not effective and don’t deserve the name vaccine) through reference to many studies, than a government advertising campaign starts up, as it did this week, telling the public in 30 seconds that mRNA vaccination provides greater protection than anything (yes anything) natural immunity can provide.

Clearly, the government’s advertising copywriters did not read this British Medical Journal article and couldn’t care less about the truth.

An Organised Campaign to Deceive the Public

It is a rather one sided battle if the government has paid the media to report their false story and exclude your referenced discussion.

It becomes an organised campaign to deceive the public when the referenced work of scientists is labelled disinformation likely to start a war by our prime minister.

The absurdity should make us laugh, but the depth of modern psychological propaganda is being exploited to the full. It is no longer a laughing matter.

Public Record of The Deception and Lies

The Hatchard Report is available as a record and referenced source of science reporting intended to alert the public to the risks of novel biotechnology.

Our public health authorities have never informed us honestly about the long term risks. Despite the effective collapse of early evidence compiled and widely publicised by Pfizer PR campaigns, our government has doubled down on mRNA vaccine use.

Apparently, our health czars have decided to follow the government and ignore the accumulating evidence of harm. It can’t be ignored any longer. They have to stand up to the government disinformation storm.

Last week I reported on a paper co-authored by Prof. Sander Greenland, perhaps one of the most experienced statisticians/epidemiologists in the world.

He found a 50% increase in serious adverse events in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated group in the Pfizer trial.

The authors point out that this finding is consistent with the findings of pharmacovigilance databases in Europe and the US. They also show that the risk of these adverse outcomes exceeds any possible benefit from reduced Covid-19 hospitalization.

8-fold Increase in Myocarditis

Another article along the same lines is a case-control study from France, which found an 8-fold increase in myocarditis after the 2^nd Pfizer injection, compared to millions of controls from the French population.

This is consistent with findings in other areas of the world. For example, a recent study of myocarditis & pericarditis from Hong Kong found a rate of myopericarditis of 37 per 100,000.

This is equivalent to 1 case per 2,700 male adolescents injected with dose 2 of Pfizer mRNA vaccine.

There are always going to be many unknowns associated with evolving scientific assessment, but there is accumulating evidence of substantial harm from the Pfizer injection which is accruing from several independent sources.

The long term risks should not and cannot be hidden from the public any longer. Nor should the government be allowed to continue making false assertions of safety and efficacy contrary to scientific fact.

The misleading saturation advertising and the public posturing of our prime minister has become a scandal and an embarrassment to our nation.

A new study of mRNA vaccine phase III trial data finds rate of serious adverse events was 12.5 per 10,000 above the background rate.

—A greater number than the Covid-19 hospitalization risk reduction.

This study raises truly serious doubts about the advisability of mRNA Covid vaccines.

The co-authors include Sander Greenland, Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology and Statistics at UCLA, and the co-author of the premiere textbook on epidemiology. Professor Greenland is a world-leading expert on the postmarketing surveillance of drugs, vaccines, and medical devices.

The paper concludes:

“The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes such as hospitalization or death.”

It is of note that this conclusion undermines the last remaining argument relied upon by governments and mainstream media to support the continued use of mRNA Covid vaccines, namely that they improve hospitalisation and death outcomes.

So far there are 4.11 million people in New Zealand fully vaccinated

The study’s conclusions suggest that more than 4,000 NZers will have suffered serious adverse effects from Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccination.

It demolishes the persistent contention of Medsafe that Covid vaccine adverse events are primarily non-serious and occur at rates little different from background rates.

• The study provides suggestive support for our contention that the elevated rates of all cause mortality we are seeing in New Zealand are related to vaccination.
• It supports our contention that Medsafe has mistakenly and too hurriedly dismissed as unrelated a wide range of adverse effects observed in New Zealand post vaccination.
• It supports our contention that at-risk individuals, including those injured by their first dose, have been wrongly denied vaccine exemptions.
• It supports our contention that unvaccinated individuals have taken a wise decision to avoid risk based on scientific information and assessment.

The study analyses the phase III trial data of Pfizer and Moderna. It applies the criteria established by the Brighton Collaboration and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations partnership, Safety Platform for Emergency vaccines (SPEAC), which created and subsequently updated a “priority list of potential adverse events of special interest relevant to COVID-19 vaccine trials.” This approach has been endorsed by the WHO.

The exhaustive analysis of the long list of adverse events of special interest indicated some areas of particular concern including coagulation disorders, colitis/enteritis, arthritis, cholecystitis, and acute respiratory distress.

The authors note that it is still the case that key details about the phase III trial outcomes remain unavailable, saying:

“A systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data should be undertaken to address questions of harm-benefit in various demographic subgroups. Full transparency of the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial data is needed to properly evaluate these questions. Unfortunately, well over a year after widespread use of COVID-19 vaccines, participant level
data remains inaccessible.”

We also note that the study is limited to particular phase III trial data, it does not therefore cover longer term adverse health outcomes of vaccination.

We also note substantive concerns raised in other papers and forums about the integrity of data in Pfizer and Moderna trials where adverse events were excluded and remained unreported.

This paper carefully asks probing questions and provides answers that Medsafe should have sought from Pfizer from the outset. It highlights the potential risks associated with the rapid introduction of the new biotechnology vaccines.

Even analysis of the preliminary trial data from vaccine manufacturers should have raised alarm bells among those charged with protecting the New Zealand public.

• It underlines the need to immediately pause the saturation advertising still being undertaken in New Zealand advising safety and efficacy of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine.
• It validates those including doctors and researchers who have been raising concerns through public dialogue, correspondence, and in the courts.
• It silently criticises the suppression of public debate mandated by the government and all political parties, supported by mainstream media.

The study shows how the New Zealand pandemic response will come to be regarded as a chapter of great shame in our history.

Lincoln National, America’s third largest insurance company has announced a 163% increase in death benefits in 2021 paid out under its group life insurance scheme which primarily covers working age 18-64 year olds.

Lincoln National attributes its consequent operating losses to “non-pandemic-related morbidity”. In other words a lot of people are becoming seriously ill and it is not due to Covid infection.

Back here in New Zealand, Stuff reported yesterday:

“District health boards say specialist shortages mean they are unable to provide safe, quality care to patients, with one board saying it needs 50% more doctors to keep up with demand.”

Staff are reporting exhaustion and overloaded wards, especially cardiac and respiratory wards.

The Hon. Little, health minister, fully justified his name by laying much of the blame for the crisis on the flu season which hasn’t yet arrived—due later in June and July.

Mr. Little is apparently never one to shrink away from the notion of backwards causation in time.

The NZ Herald headlined yesterday—our ‘whole health system is falling to bits’.

“New data, released under the Official Information Act, revealed nearly 3000 patients waited longer than six hours to be treated at New Zealand’s busiest ED last month.”

Mr. Little didn’t mention that he sacked a lot of hospital staff through vaccine mandates—available staff who are still prevented from working. Many of whom are possibly better protected from Covid than their vaccinated colleagues through the natural immunity acquired through prior infection.

He didn’t mention the overseas experience—UK hospital staff, none of whom were ever vaccine-mandated, no longer even have to routinely wear masks (let alone the general public).

In contrast, NZ hospital staff were mandated to receive boosters before 25 February or lose their positions.

Who are the Real Government Copywriters?

I am left wondering who actually writes the government’s Covid policy announcements and advertising material.

This week we were regaled on social media with multiple slots advising us that if we have had Covid already (which is most of us) then the natural immunity you have gained is worthless without a booster shot.

No risk is too high when it comes to proving these shots really do work if you have enough of them.

I have a feeling that whoever is churning out the government advertising PR is not actually reviewing published data.

They are more likely to be qualified in journalism and focusing hard to make up whatever they can to satisfy a ‘vaccine or bust’ brief.

The idea that natural immunity from prior infection doesn’t work is fantasy copywriting pure and simple.

A paper just published by the BMJ argues that, on the evidence available, pandemic policies should have recognised proof of natural immunity as a sufficient basis for exemption to vaccination requirements.

It further concludes that there is no compelling evidence for the superiority of Covid vaccine-induced immunity.

My reading of the official current New Zealand Covid data unambiguously backs this up—the unvaccinated are gradually becoming less vulnerable to Covid infection and hospitalisation (presumably gaining natural immunity) but the vaccinated are not, their level of protection is gradually declining.

The reason must lie with the characteristic effects of the mRNA vaccine.

From Friday, District Health Boards will no longer exist when the centralised new government entity Health New Zealand takes over. In a show of responsibility, Minister Little has announced a ‘high power taskforce’ charged with clearing the long hospital backlogs.

Do you, like me, lack confidence in Labour’s centralised government control?

Would you describe our health crisis as the result of long hospital backlogs rather than a failed pandemic strategy?

Or would you ask some hard questions and expect answers? Whoops, you can’t ask questions of Jacinda Ardern. If you do, you lose your job, get sprayed with water or pepper, and are forced to listen to loud music through the night.

Jacinda, we lament:

In the North, South, East and West,
We gave you our votes and our best,
You were toasted in our talk, and our song;
We thought that love would last forever: We were wrong.

Your cabinet stars are not wanted now; put them out every one,
You packed the parliament and threatened the young,
You poured away the budget and usurped the good;
Nothing now can ever come to anything that it should.

We’re mourners now and march to muffled drum…

(Apologies to W H Auden Funeral Blues)

Truth Cannot Remain Hidden

The government messaging has so far been overwhelming. The government can pretend, it can make up stories to placate an increasingly informed and suspicious public, but it can’t hide the truth forever.

New Zealand is becoming aware that a foreign mega entity is draining our coffers and injuring our best with impunity.

Sometimes I am reminded of the history of World War 1. From Gallipoli to Verdun to Somme to Ypres. No doubt the generals, far from the trenches, considered that each successive push over the top would succeed when all previous had failed miserably.

All the while the casualties mounted. Poor New Zealand was there, like today, at the behest of foreign powers whose sense of the value of human life was attuned to a game of dice—over the top again lads.

Billions of dollars have poured into the coffers of Pfizer, the medical establishment, universities, and the biotechnology industry.

This has happened all over the world and has created a vested interest in continuing the pandemic along with all its trappings and contractors.

The miracle is that none of these protagonists are liable for the injuries and deaths. They have legal immunity and their profits are stupendous. No one is required to shoulder any blame.

As the German pacifist Kurt Tucholsky satirised the horrors of war:

“The war? I cannot find it to be so bad! The death of one man: this is a catastrophe. Hundreds of thousands of deaths: that is a statistic!”

Today he might just as well have said ‘pandemic’ rather than ‘war’, or are we actually in the midst of an undeclared bout of modern germ warfare?

A war conjured up in secret biotech laboratories. A heartless and grim conflict where the injured are not just mere statistics but, thanks to propaganda, are not even aware of the true cause of their novel maladies.

Every day we hear we are winning the war, just one last push, one more boost, over the top to the promised land.

More revelations this week about behind the scenes manipulation of public opinion.

Melissa Fleming is a journalist who was appointed United Nations Under Secretary General for Global Communications in September 2019 just in time for the pandemic.

In a recent talk, Ms. Fleming spoke about her use of invasive behavioural science techniques at the UN to encourage support for the official WHO pandemic narrative (to view Ms. Fleming talking, pick this video up at 47 minutes).

She reported on her UN program Verity which trained 100 scientists around the world to flood social media platforms with what Ms. Fleming called the UN-owned science and to discourage circulation of material counter to the UN/WHO position.

Ms. Fleming implied that bare facts of published science papers are uninteresting and need to be nuanced in order to give them the required impact.

A New Brand of Science Journalism

Ms. Fleming is no stranger to public relations journalism having previously been for eight years Head of Press & Public Information at the International Atomic Energy Agency.

She represents a new brand of science journalism which seeks to reshape the narrative of modern science to facilitate public consumption and acceptance.

In so doing the obvious linchpins of the scientific method and process have been sidelined. Science is a process of experimentation and progressive testing of theories leading eventually to verification.

There are many stakeholders in this process which often involves competing ideas, interpretations, or paradigms (scientific genres). It also quantifies degrees of certainty and conversely large areas of uncertainty.

Fleming outlined a brand of public relations/journalism which seeks to portray absolute scientific certainty, where actually there is doubt and a high degree of risk.

The purpose is to satisfy the commercial- or power and influence-seeking objectives of their employers. The ultimate aim is to garner public acceptance for products through promotion of an aura of scientific infallibility and inevitability.

Unprecedented Levels of Irreversible Risk

No subject could be more unsuited to this modus operandi than Covid pandemic policy. Biotechnology was well known to involve unprecedented levels of irreversible risk.

The pandemic involves an evolving disease trajectory that was possibly created as part of a bioweapons program and a vaccine that derived from experimental gene therapy with a history of spectacular failures and adverse effects.

Describing the pandemic response as fait accompli science that was somehow owned by the UN and the WHO amounted to a take over of science, medical ethics, and human rights on a breathtaking scale—modern journalism allied with methods of social manipulation and control that were completely discredited by the revelations that followed in the wake of the second world war and the end of the Soviet Union.

To pursue this agenda it was necessary to quash the actual process of scientific evolution by silencing even highly qualified scientists urging caution.

The Narrative Has Completely Lost Touch

Such was the success of the combined forces applying the new PR methods, including pharmaceutical giants, government agencies, social media behemoths, and international forces like the UN, that their agenda has snowballed out of control and the narrative has completely lost touch with the evolving process of real pandemic science assessment and evaluation.

Most of the world’s population have come to believe in the safety, effectiveness, and profundity of the new biotechnology vaccination processes because of the apparent massive endorsement of the science, but it was not actually science, it was journalism allied with behavioural manipulation at work.

I am beginning to feel very sympathetic towards the vaccinated. They have been the unwitting victims of the psychic numbing promoted by the UN, WHO and the global pharmaceutical PR machine.

Actual science is trying to catch up with the hyperbole, deception, and control managed by media and government overreach, but we have almost arrived at a situation where catch up is out of hand.

Covid 19 Vaccines Don’t Work And Their Long Term Effects Are Unhealthy

The truth about this disturbing Orwellian agenda has come at a time when the weight of science has found that not only do Covid 19 vaccines not actually work but their long term effects are unhealthy.

More to the point, an increasing number of scientists are admitting, albeit in some cases reluctantly, that the true extent of adverse effects is not only misunderstood, but may be far more serious than any previous worst case suspicions.

As we reported last week, (Shining a Light in Dark Places—Ten Ways the Government Controls the Pandemic Narrative) immune imprinting resulting from Covid vaccination limits the capacity of physiology to respond to the new BA4/5 variants.

It shouldn’t have been unexpected, studies completed way before the pandemic indicate that viruses evolve to bypass vaccines, especially if the vaccine is not that effective at stopping transmission.

The truth is that a lot of established science was simply forgotten during the process of formulating pandemic policy. The involvement of unscrupulous commercial interests and power seeking political bodies was in no small measure to blame.

Unfortunately, the push for the pharmaceutical/biotechnology vision of universal mRNA vaccination continues regardless. All the while the real basis of health is ignored.

It has become a runaway train sustained by journalistic imagination and the wilful doubling down of medical hacks and governments devoid of the safeguards of traditional science.

The Unvaccinated are Increasingly Enjoying Enhanced Herd Immunity

In contrast, data shows that the unvaccinated are increasingly enjoying enhanced herd immunity following Covid infection with the mild Omicron variants.

As rates of cardiac events and all-cause mortality rise in highly vaccinated populations, it is increasingly obvious that the vaccinated will need a lot of help to get their health back on track.

Early on in the pandemic, a few studies indicated that taking care of your own health naturally is highly effective at preventing serious Covid outcomes. The implications of these studies urgently need to inform government policy

A lighter diet, a regular exercise regime, adequate rest, and some traditional anti-inflammatory medicinal herbs and spices all help. The help they provide is not marginal, it is stunning.

I have reported on these effects in earlier articles. For example, a study found that there was a 71% reduction in Covid hospitalisation rates among vegetarians.

If you have been bewitched by sophisticated techniques of behavioural manipulation into thinking that a pill or a jab on its own will guarantee health, you have been misled.

Those with unresolved health issues have been most at risk from Covid. Many prevalent chronic conditions are caused or complicated by diet and lifestyle choices which can be reversed naturally and safely with the right advice.

99% of our health results from our own management of lifestyle, diet, and behaviour, but always remember, if you are feeling unwell, to also take professional advice in good time. A stitch in time saves nine.

Each successive generation innovates, but at the same time some vital areas of knowledge are lost due to the passage of time and the gap between generations.

In this case, discredited techniques of social control have been rediscovered and misused in a modern context. The profit motive has been allowed to overturn standards of medical ethics and risk assessment. Biotechnology innovation has come to threaten the basis of life itself.

This article was originally published on the thelookingglass.co.nz and is republished here with permission.

The Hood: ‘Kiwi kids are getting jabbed with a product different to the formulation that was approved by Medsafe’

The Looking Glass speaks to co-director of The Hood, Sereca Friend, about why they are challenging the Government’s decision to approve the Pfizer injection for five-to-11 year olds in the High Court later this month.

Something that is not widely known is that the New Zealand drugs regulator Medsafe has allowed Kiwi kids to be injected with a different formulation of the Pfizer product than the one that safety studies were supplied for, says The Hood’s Sereca Friend.

Friend, who founded the collective of parents, doctors, scientists and concerned citizens that is facilitating taking the Government to court over the approval of the Pfizer jab for five-to-11 year olds, says Pfizer produced the safety studies for the first formulation but then supplied an altered formula.

“They created an updated paediatric version of the product that they then supplied us with, but they didn’t supply updated safety studies, because they argued the two ingredients they changed were just buffers. OIA’s sent by The ‘Hood were replied to by Medsafe, expressing that as these were only stabilisers, and in trace amounts, Pfizer had replied this was ok.”

Friend argues, “any change to an experimental formulation for children must be rigorously researched, emergency status is not an excuse to skip safety trials!”

The extra ingredient in question is Tromethamine (comprised of two ingredients), she says.

“The whole thing with Medsafe, is in the name, they have a responsibility to keep our medicines safe and to demand more from Pfizer and companies supplying medications for children, and healthy individuals. It’s not good enough. They have a duty to protect all of us, but, especially children.”

This is just one of the things you probably never knew about the paediatric jab that Friend and her colleagues at The ‘Hood, hope will get some attention by forcing the Government to fess up about its approval process and the data they used.

Despite the fact that an interim injunction brought by The ‘Hood earlier this year failed to pause the roll out of the jab to kids, Friend says they believe it probably stopped the Government introducing a vaccine mandate for kids to do community activities, such as sports and peer related events.

“After the rollout began, we were witness to emails expressing the announcement of upcoming restrictions on five-to-11 year olds. I know that those decisions were reversed and we think, had this court case not happened, we wouldn’t be in the place we are in right now. There would be a lot more children vaccinated. The majority of the 12-to-15 year olds that got it, did so for reasons other than health – to participate in life, as they should be free to do”.

The most shocking part for Friend, she says, is why we are injecting kids in the first place when there is zero risk for kids from covid.

“Secondly, it’s the media campaign and the despicable use of children to protect others. That goes against the Care of Children Act. It is unethical to give a child a treatment to protect another person. The fact that the media and the Government have openly promoted that you should go and get your children jabbed to protect your whanau, and that it’s a responsible thing for a child to do. It’s completely against their human rights and yet it is openly and utterly abused in this situation.”

There is also risk for kids from adverse reactions to the product. Pfizer’s own data stated it could not calculate the risk of myocarditis for children because the study wasn’t long enough, but this didn’t stop Medsafe approving it.

Friend states their evidence shows “Our own CARM website shows over a 5000% increase in adverser event reporting in the last year alone. An alarming increase, that should be raising serious red flags.”

“With the adults, everything was done on guestimates and modelling because it was new, but, once we got to the kids we had alarming evidence based on actual data, and actual real life problems, with massive red flags. We know. We don’t use any modelling in our case. We use real world data. We can reference things that the Government knew prior to approving this product, that was solid evidence.”

Friend says the precautionary principle is a must when considering giving children medications.

“Children and young people, you don’t mess about with them and you don’t experiment on them. The fact that their studies state ‘we can’t tell you about the risk of myocarditis because the studies were not long enough’, and Medsafe says ‘no worries’. As a parent, it’s like, ‘I’m sorry, what?!’.”

I asked Friend what the worst case scenario was in terms of the court case outcome.

“I don’t believe that there is anything worse than what we are in at the moment. Not going ahead is the worst case. Once we are finished in court we can publish reports that will become public record, this means that family court cases can reference things that our experts have clearly laid out. Our goal is to build awareness.

“The Government could still bring in mandates for this age group, and the booster for five-to-11 year olds and the release of the six month-to-four year olds jab is likely to be approved here next”, she says.

The FDA in the United States is on the cusp of approving the injection for the preschool age group this week. The New Zealand public has a chance to stop that with this case.

“Our evidence is frickin’ amazing and people need to hear it, we need to be in front of the media and make them listen. They will only do that when we make it to court, when it’s public interest and they have a responsibility to report it,” she says.

For a rundown of The Hood’s expert witnesses go here.

A substantive review of both parties (The Crown vs The Hood) expert evidence will take place on 27 June and 28 June at the High Court in Wellington.

The Hood still needs to raise $106,500 to pay for the $250,000 judicial review, and is accepting donations for just four more days.

What happens if they can’t raise the remaining amount?

“The issue is now that we have to pay our bills or we won’t go to court. No extension, that’s it, the case heart-breakingly ends there.”