Home Blog Page 30

Frontiers of Knowledge: Understanding the Higher Functions of Genetic Structures Paired With Human Consciousness

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Frontiers of Knowledge: Understanding the Higher Functions of Genetic Structures Paired With Human Consciousness

I was asked this morning: Do you think political change will solve our pandemic problems?

My answer: What we need is knowledge. They do say that you learn from success, but if you make any mistakes make sure you learn from them.

We have had so many warning signals and we should have learned so many lessons during the pandemic about what life is, how it works, and what is important. Our task is to assimilate and apply the most profound implications of what we have experienced. To seek the truth. That is a way ahead. A road out of the pandemic maze.

Immunity is Learned by Our DNA

Since its discovery 70 years ago, DNA has been largely and crudely conceived as a static repository of information. Rather like a fixed manual that our physiology refers to for instructions. The discovery of epigenetic phenomena and the increasing understanding of RNA and its expression in biomolecular activity should have changed that understanding.

Moreover, DNA self regulates and expresses different aspects of its structure. Genes can become upregulated or downregulated during different periods of life. In more understandable language, our DNA can learn from experience how to function so to speak—as we ourselves also learn from experience. DNA certainly has capabilities that remain unknown and unused.

Our physiology is daily challenged by billions of toxins, pathogens, bacteria, viruses, fungi, and microorganisms. Some of these are our long term partners where containment is routine. Some are inevitably newcomers requiring a learning curve on the part of the immune system. The overall complexity of immune responses goes far beyond the possibility of complete intellectual understanding, man made control, or successful safe modification.

The DNA, Individual Identity, and Field Phenomena

The implications of how DNA is in every one of billions of cells but somehow expresses itself as a whole single person have never been adequately tackled scientifically and theoretically. We could say this is the enigma of individual identity, genetics, and memory.

DNA is at the heart of a WHOLE genetic system and the whole is more than the sum of the parts. Our genetic system has its silent non-changing nature and its changing expression, but this is not a mechanical system. It acts more like a unified field.

Physical fields like gravity are everywhere and they appear to have static rules, but they exhibit characteristics of both waves and particles and their quantum nature ensures that the apparently static rules can be bypassed. Quantum mechanics also ensures that the entire history of events remains connected with the present as it creates the future.

Go deeper and physical fields have more amazing properties. DNA is obviously an expression of more fundamental and more unified physical laws. To describe these, you need non-abelian mathematics—the unified field level thinks for itself as it creates time and space. A unified field structure cannot depend on anything outside of itself in order to express itself and its expressions are part of itself. It is self-referral. Self-referral is a suitable descriptive analogy for DNA.

Self-referral is the hallmark of our consciousness (we create from within ourselves) and the hallmark of DNA. Both have a silent phase and an active expressed phase, inseparable companions through the journey of life. Everything that goes on in our physiology has been an expression of the DNA in our very first cell. As such, physiology is a connected WHOLE. The mechanism for this WHOLENESS is not yet understood.

Human Genetic Modification is Inherently Unpredictable

Even changing a part of the whole genetic and physiological structure can have drastic consequences. It is known that transplant recipients can change in character. Heart recipients especially can acquire the memories and behaviours of their donors. A vegetarian concert pianist may suddenly become interested in eating hamburgers and rushing about on motorcycles if these interests coincide with those of their heart donor.

Use biotechnology to modify DNA and you are challenging the whole structure of life. Seek to modify its immediate fundamental expressions through messenger RNA, and you risk severing the connection of the physiology with some functions of the DNA. In parallel, you risk modifying the connection between consciousness and DNA, mind and body. You could be modifying your self-expression.

Messenger RNA carries information between the DNA and the physiology. Command RNA to perform differently and you are as if ordering a lead actor in a play to speak lines that are not part of the script and yet thinking that the play will still be understandable. In other words, gene therapy can change the script of life and thereby endanger health. Ultimately health is wholeness, physiology has a script, seek to edit it at your peril.

The generally accepted medical biotechnology paradigm or outlook involves the objectification of human physiology. Physiology, including its genetic roots, is largely treated as a machine. One simple analogy might be a heat pump with a remote controller. We can press a button to make the temperature go up or down. Physiology is not a machine in this sense, it is a whole self-referral conscious system. Gene therapy involves allowing someone else to reprogram or redesign your own buttons based on very limited knowledge and crude understanding. The outcomes are known to be at best uncertain and in some cases catastrophic.

Mind and Body, Two Sides of The Coin of Life

Given the risks associated with the current course of medical biotechnology, will we have to step out from under the biotech umbrella to escape? Yes. What will this involve? Organic agriculture, avoiding ultra processed foods, rediscovery of traditional natural remedies, detox, consciousness-based education, and spiritual renewal—some or all of these? It will be life-changing.

In my opinion, our hope for the future resides with the natural world of plants and herbs, and with human consciousness. Technologies of consciousness do not require a biotechnologist, we are in sole charge of our own consciousness. Cultural and spiritual history records that the heights of human consciousness—compassion, vision, leadership in its most enlightened sense—have been attained by some.

True, we have to avoid the pitfalls of mood making and an overly fertile imagination. The pandemic has reinforced the fact that those imagining themselves to be all-knowing very often aren’t. There was an article in the Guardian today “Secret life of Gerald: the New Zealand MP who spent a lifetime crafting a vast imaginary world”. I jokingly thought that such could be said of all politicians and then realised it could be true of all of us. ‘What if’ and ‘if only’ inhabit our waking hours and thoughts, but that doesn’t invalidate the authenticity of the evolutionary journey we are all making.

Ultimately our personal consciousness is travelling on a road to a worthwhile destination. The evolutionary road or substrate on which consciousness travels is structured out of our human genetics and nourished by the food we eat. If we randomly alter human genetics, or debase our traditional food sources, we may be blocked or diverted, and unable to progress.

Technologies of Mind and Body Have a Place in Medicine and Beyond

Undoubtedly there are technologies of consciousness—steps to take and guidance that can be given to maximise clarity of consciousness and the resultant benefits for health. There are proven benefits also in organic fresh foods. Do meditation and fresh food deserve a place in medicine? Yes. Consciousness cannot be incompatible with the science of genetics—our DNA is permanently paired with our own consciousness.

My book Your DNA Diet contains over 800 supporting references in the scientific literature. It presents the thesis, based on a growing body of research, that the DNA of the food we eat provides essential support for health. When we eat fresh food, we are consuming order, or we could even say ‘intelligence’, which is essential to health. If we don’t eat, we rapidly lose health. Meditation has also been found to have profound benefits for health.

Just consider that when we report that we are healthy, it primarily means we ‘feel’ well. Every medical condition is paired with the psychology of the patient. Mind and body are intimately connected. In most cases our ‘state of mind’ and adequacy of diet are the paramount contributors to health. Most illness has a psychosomatic component—it is caused or complicated by mental stress or dysfunction. It goes without saying that improving our mental disposition and eating healthy food is beneficial.

Are There Objective Benchmarks of Consciousness?

I helped support a school in Merseyside in the UK which includes the practice of meditation. The academic and creative success of the school in GCSE exams as well as art, poetry, and writing competitions eventually ensured it gained full government financial support which shows that meditation can be objectively integrated into curricula.

Meditation is subjective, but it can be taught as a systematic technique. As with any objective technology, it can have repeatable results. It does have signposts of attainment. There are studies showing that brain functioning improves paired with higher academic achievement and psychological characteristics such as field independence—the capacity to see the big picture while focusing on details.

We are familiar with waking, dreaming, and sleeping states of consciousness each of these is paired with a different style of physiological functioning. Transcendence is recorded as an authentic experience in historical and contemporary accounts. It appears during those moments when we slip into the timeless oceanic feeling that lies behind the changing surface of life. It is often referred to as the fourth state of consciousness. An all-encompassing state of inner awakening that Walt Whitman attempted to express in his book Democratic Vistas:

“There is, in sanest hours, a consciousness, a thought that rises, independent, lifted out from all else, calm, like the stars, shining eternal….In such devout hours, in the midst of the significant wonders of heaven and earth, …creeds, conventions, fall away and become of no account…”

This hints at profound capabilities of the human mind, supported by physiology and DNA, that we can aspire to, that await development. If we are seeking the highest Truth in its broadest sense, we must remember that Truth is a unified state of Being. Others might refer to it as a state of Grace in the presence of the Will of God. Or as Einstein said:

“The most beautiful and most profound experience is the sensation of the mystical. It is the sower of all true science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead.”

Whatever we call TRUTH or however we describe the experience (and words always fall short), it is a timeless experience of Wholeness. An experience much needed in modern times. A firm anchor to ensure we are not swept off our feet by the ups and downs of circumstances and the machinations of unthinking politicians, unethical predators, and incautious experimenters. Truth can light a way ahead.

Guy Hatchard PhD is formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

The Strange Case of the Gates Foundation, the US CDC, and Our NZ Health Data

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Strange Case of the Gates Foundation, the US CDC, and Our NZ Health Data

How NZ cooperated with a global biotech vaccine experiment.

The record rates of excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated countries including New Zealand show that a disaster has expanded silently and spread rapidly fanned by biotechnology lobbying and government sponsored pandemic policies. How did this happen? (If you have heretofore closed your eyes and ears, mind or heart to the accumulating scientific evidence of Covid vaccine harm published in journals, but now you wish to catch up, you can reference this succinct review on substack).

The Gates Foundation, the CDC, and our NZ health data

On Tuesday 2nd November 2021, almost a year ago, there was a meeting of the New Zealand Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV-TAG) upon which the government relies for pandemic advice. The Chair of the group is Dr. Ian Town, Chief Science Advisor to the government. “There were nine members present including Dr. Petousis-Harris, a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland who also advises Pfizer (an obvious conflict of interest), plus eight officials from the Ministry of Health, and four other guests.”

Sitting in on the meeting as a guest was Mr. John Tait, an obstetrician, the interim director and Chief Medical Officer of Te Whata Ora—Health New Zealand which was soon to take over the entire health system of New Zealand, taking it out of the diversified control of District Health Boards and into the direct control of the Government.

The meeting was taking place just a few days after Jacinda Ardern with the full support of the Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (19 October minutes point 3.0) announced sweeping Covid vaccine mandates affecting private and public sectors with the intention of 100% compliance (it would eventually reach close to 95% of the eligible population, among the highest in the world). Ardern would soon publicly admit that the aim was to make life very difficult for anyone who refused vaccination.

Point 8.3 in the minutes of the 2nd Nov 2021 meeting released under an OIA request is entitled Research Extension: Establishing a foundation for monitoring the safety of Covid-19 vaccines using primary care data. It was approved that the University of Auckland be allowed to extend a research project to establish background rates of adverse events of special interest (AESI) of COVID-19 vaccines from hospital discharge data and enable a foundation for monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines using New Zealand primary care data.

The research project referred to is a partnership between the University of Auckland and the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) to monitor adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines around the world. Dr Petousis-Harris is co-director of GVDN which has been funded by the Gates Foundation and the US CDC.

The GVDN website says it is aiming to set up global surveillance infrastructure capable of responding to safety signals post-introduction of Covid-19 vaccines. This sounds like a laudable organisation intent on protecting public health, but.…

The other co-director of GVDN is US vaccine advocate Dr. Stephen Black emeritus professor University of Cincinnati, a pediatric infectious disease specialist. In an interview he paints a radically different picture of GVDN and indicates it is actually an organisation primarily aimed to fight vaccine hesitancy:

“While vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccine communication have become global, the ability to respond to such concerns has remained largely fractured, without coordination between countries. This project is a game-changer. Through its scale, transparency, timeliness and open communication [???], it will contribute to vaccine confidence around the world.”

It is easy to appreciate what a prize access to New Zealand health data seemed to be for an organisation devoted to combating vaccine hesitancy and to their sponsors including the Gates Foundation and the US CDC. A remote nation with a team of five million people prepared to:

  • Close their borders completely to travel,
  • Use a single vaccine,
  • Coerce the entire population to be vaccinated
  • Collect centralised data from a universal healthcare system
  • Largely refuse vaccine exemptions
  • Seize any potential competing treatments such as ivermectin at customs.

What a contrast to the US, which has a diverse private healthcare system, a porous border, a wide range of treatments, a multiplicity of available vaccines, and a population with a tradition of freedom of medical choice.

Almost a year has gone by since GVDN was uniquely granted access to New Zealand’s primary health care data. Data that has not been made publicly available in our own country. Essential safety data that has been repeatedly requested by New Zealand researchers but remains hidden. During this time, our all cause mortality has risen to record levels close to 35% above seasonally adjusted historical trends but the New Zealand public has been given no comprehensive and accurate information about its cause by GVDN who have the data, despite its stated aim to respond to safety signals.

To establish the cause of the unprecedented rate of all cause mortality and the potential impact of vaccination on health, a researcher would need details of vaccination status and cause of death or hospital admission data broken down by age. In other words, the primary healthcare data that GVDN has access to.

Has GVDN gone largely quiet because the data shows that something has gone terribly wrong with vaccine safety?

The silence is deafening, few if any New Zealanders are aware that GVDN exists. The main source of public information is repeated government funded advertisements encouraging booster uptake along with fawning MSM articles. New Zealanders have been deliberately kept in the dark.

From the meagre information and bland safety assurances the government and MSM have publicised, it is hard to escape the notion that those with medical authority including establishment scientific bodies are happy for pandemic causal investigation to be either oversimplified for public consumption as solely the result of ‘Covid infection’ or remain largely out of the public domain.

There are some really big questions here. How much was the New Zealand government pandemic policy coordinated to suit the agenda of Pfizer, the Gates Foundation, and the US CDC? Ardern made an abrupt change between September 21st 2021 when she said there would be no penalties for the unvaccinated and October 11th 2021 when she introduced coercive mandates. What changed her mind? Was a decision taken in this period to view the New Zealand public as suitable participants in a global study?

The dangers are obvious. CV-TAG, the Ministry of Health, the government, and the University of Auckland handed over information vital for vaccine safety monitoring to an unregulated global body—GVDN—committed to eradicate vaccine hesitancy. Had the main players, including Ardern, began to aspire to leading roles in a naisant proto-global crusading medical decision-making structure?

It is startling how, in such an unregulated global organisation, the health and safety of national populations such as ours can begin to take a backseat. Had the offered carrot to become ‘a world leader in suppressing vaccine hesitancy and proving the efficacy and safety of novel biotechnology’ swayed minds to the extent that accepted standards of caution, medical ethics, and public safety could be fudged?

Just how far will the government and the medical establishment be prepared to go to sweep excess deaths data under the carpet?

This week the Justice Committee tabled a Coroners Amendment Bill for public consultation. The public has until Wednesday at the latest to make a submission here. Among its key provisions the Bill would make it clear that:

‘Coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act’

In other words, coroners might be able to ease off in their traditional role to diligently pursue a cause of death. Yet any reliable mortality research requires that cause of death be made available as accurately as possible. Enabling coroners to record “unascertained natural causes” as a cause of death diminishes the availability of information vital for basic research on public health and vaccine safety.

At a time when dietary and environmental inputs and medical procedures are rapidly changing, it is essential that all possible efforts be made to ensure as much information be made available to researchers. Instead such access to the needed New Zealand health data has been quietly granted to GVDN, a global organisation with the avowed aim of tackling vaccine hesitancy.

Despite this, it remains true that deaths do not go away, they may at first be ignored, swept under the carpet, or labelled ‘unascertained’, but if excess mortality builds up, as it has, an unstoppable natural process to restore the balance of truth is set in motion. People care about their children, their families, and their loved ones. They don’t forget.

Any organisation which seeks to hide information will eventually be scrutinised. An accounting is inevitable. It may be postponed for a while, but the greater the contrived delay, the greater the perceived error.

How did those promoting mRNA vaccination get it so wrong?

Those who in November 2021 handed over New Zealand health data access were no doubt expecting a success story to unfold which would win themselves and New Zealand global plaudits and prestige. They got it wrong because they misunderstood the basic science and the safety issues of biotechnology (for more information watch my video The Pandemic of Biotechnology).

It is now clear that the toxicity of novel genetic material and its mobility were underestimated from the origin of the pandemic through to the rapid development of gene-based vaccines. More importantly, the complexity and hierarchy of genetic command and control systems in the physiology were misunderstood and oversimplified.

Certainly, it was realised that single genes do not have a single function. Genetic material and epigenetic partner structures are known to have multiple functions and to act in consort with other genes-based systems, but how many interlocking functions there are in the complexity of human physiology was radically underestimated.

Moreover, it was assumed that microbiological processes, which constantly clean up errors, foreign bodies, pathogens, and expended biomolecules, would be able to cope with injected genetic instructions and limit the extent of their influence in physiological and societal space, and over time. This assumption has proved to be in error.

The overly simplified theoretical understanding of mRNA action, and the very few experiments to assess this, were wholly inadequate to model actual in vivo processes and potential adverse effects. Moreover, negative outcomes were hidden. These have now become apparent as a result of the court-ordered release of Pfizer trial data. Data that has confirmed concerning deaths following vaccination.

What are the lessons?

Poorly-scienced public health ideas and commercial pressures have been hard at work. Naive biotech health expectations fuelled by public relations stories have played a role. Biotech vaccine innovation rapidly became a financial juggernaut whose profits exceeded commercial projections by at least ten fold. This attracted hot and greedy investment money, some of it shared by media ownership platforms. Access to New Zealand data became a prized target.

There is very little that commands respect or confidence in the pandemic response, and much to criticise. Missing in the rush to novel biomedical technology is a clear understanding of the roots of health. Our health is 99% determined by our diet, lifestyle, environment, the air we breathe, and above all by our mental equilibrium. Those in charge of New Zealand’s health chose to ignore these strong time-tested natural defences as they enrolled us all, including our children, in a giant biotech experiment.

In a symbolic and very real way the pandemic is the beginning of the end for our medical systems, as we have known them. It was caused by all the inherent contradictions in our profit-orientated pharmaceutical/medical system, which allowed lax control of biotechnology research. Thinking that biotechnology can solve everything will always be remembered as an example of the hubris and greed of the human race. As a result we must become more respectful and more aware of the enormous complexity and protective efficiency of natural immunity and unmodified human genetics.

Donation Options

A Timely Message for the Vaccinated

Guy Hatchard
-
0
A Timely Message for the Vaccinated

Pandemic policy is slowly changing in response to health data. Is it changing fast enough and is it changing in the right direction?

From the beginning, there were concerns about the long term outcomes following both covid infection and vaccination. At this point, these are becoming more clearly appreciated.

Neither the dire predictions of widespread Covid severity nor the protection of Covid vaccination have eventuated as initially promised.

Health authorities remain heavily committed to a Covid strategy that relies upon mRNA vaccination. Is it working?

All cause mortality has reached record levels. Our health system is reportedly overwhelmed. mRNA vaccination does not prevent Covid infection. Why?

The reasons for these effects are technical, but were not unexpected. There has always been a fear that mRNA vaccination might depress immune function.

Antibody-Dependent Enhancement

Vaccine-induced antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) occurs when our immune antibodies generated as a result of vaccination combine with a pathogen to facilitate its entry into cells and thereby enhance infection. In one sense we could say this occurs because our immune system becomes so familiar with a pathogen that it learns to accept it. The result can be repeated infections.

A ground-breaking paper from Japan published on 16 September 2022 entitled “Reevaluation of antibody-dependent enhancement of infection in anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic antibodies and mRNA-vaccine antisera using FcR- and ACE2-positive cells” explores this possibility and concludes that both therapeutic antibody Covid treatments and mRNA vaccination can result in ADE.

Are There Sufficient Reasons to Exercise Caution?

Does this mean that mRNA Covid vaccination programmes should be halted? At this point, policy makers are beginning to entertain divergent opinions. Denmark has halted Covid vaccination for the under 50s. The UK has halted vaccination for the under 12’s.

Amid growing concerns, the most worrying trend is for authorities and employers to double down on vaccine requirements or dismiss questioning voices out of hand in a manner that is detached from the evolving scientific findings. Incredibly, the Netherlands is discussing the reintroduction of vaccine passes.

It is important to understand that vaccination in general is the mainstay of medical policy everywhere. From the outset, it was always accepted that mRNA vaccination would be effective and safe. Now significant doubts have arisen, but like a poker player who has gone all in on a bet, changing strategies does not look possible to many in the medical profession. They are hoping that more of the same—more boosters will pull everyone through.

Conversely, a number of strong vaccine advocates are expressing doubts and wavering. Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases and a world expert on vaccines, immunology, and virology who is a contributing editor of the authoritative New England Journal of Medicine doesn’t himself intend to get omicron-specific boosters and doesn’t advise it for others. He says the research is insufficient. He also worries that mRNA vaccination has been inappropriately offered to young people. Steve Kirsch has suggested (tongue in cheek) that he now fits the dictionary definition of an anti-vaxxer.

Offit is by no means the only one speaking up, at this point, discussions about mRNA vaccine safety are being widely aired. See this article in SSRN “COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters for Young Adults: A Risk-Benefit Assessment and Five Ethical Arguments against Mandates at Universities“.

There is still a lot that we don’t know. I have written extensively about this over the last few weeks at the HatchardReport.com and referenced the issue to recent journal publications.

All-cause mortality is rising. The real concern here is that governments have been very cagey about releasing data on cause of death paired with vaccination status—a prerequisite for definitive research. Where data is available, such as from UK ONS, it strongly points to a concerning relationship between all cause death and Covid vaccination. MSM is reluctant to cover these issues, especially ADE.

When Science Can Be Labelled Disinformation

Jacinda Ardern has flown to New York in a private jet with Emmanuel Macron, and Justine Trudeau for a week of intense diplomacy with world leaders. Her focus is expected to be on controlling mis- and disinformation, and online extremism.

Just remember that last September New Zealand health officials and advisors dismissed as disinformation claims by New Zealand GP Dr. Peter Canady that mRNA vaccination can result in ADE. It never was disinformation, Canady was simply seeking to initiate a scientific discussion based on published research and theoretical inference. Now ADE is a scientifically recognised result of mRNA vaccination, so he was right to probe the issues.

This wasn’t Dr. Canady’s only claim. He also suggested mRNA vaccines are not very effective at preventing transmission. A claim that was also dismissed as disinformation at the time. Something that we now know to be true.

My suggestion is that we are being left partially in the dark. This is partly because mRNA vaccination safety has become a hot potato that no one wants to hold and partly the result of vaccine extremism. Public safety should have been paramount. New research is raising concerning issues.

We are referencing human health here, not political allegiance. This is fundamentally a scientific matter. Therefore you might consider joining those who are asking hard questions and expecting answers. Otherwise new research findings could be swept under the carpet and deliberately withheld from the public.

New Biotechnology Initiatives Are Poised to Overwhelm Us

Guy Hatchard
-
0
New Biotechnology Initiatives Are Poised to Overwhelm Us

If you poison people indiscriminately, civilization comes to an end

Pride comes before the fall. We are very proud of the technological achievements of our modern civilization, but it has come at a cost to our health. Our planet is becoming more and more littered with damaging pollution in agricultural land, medical practice, ageing cities, the air we breathe, the houses we live in, the seas, and importantly the food we eat.

Modern technology has enabled invasive pollution to reach every corner of the globe. Every technology requires a technologist. Some technologists have difficulty valuing human life over profits. Especially, it seems, biotechnologists who have rewritten the book on pollution by modifying human genetics.

Health services aim to maximise profit

National Health Services in virtually all countries have the face of a lamb but the teeth of a ravenous wolf. Your GP appears to be a kindly dedicated reassuring individual offering you the best methods to get well. Behind him is a sophisticated pharmaceutical economic system designed to maximise profit. This is a system whose priorities have long since begun to lose contact with medical ethics, fundamental principles of health, and patient needs. The pandemic has accelerated the parting of the ways.

Biotechnology is alien technology—technology that is alien to human life. I don’t speak in these terms lightly. Risky biotech interventions are being created through groping steps of experimentation. Not by the cosmic process of natural evolution which has guided human steps through the long corridor of time, but by the guesswork of a few madly arrogant and misguided scientists determined to leave their mark on the human race.

Like drug dealers pressuring potential clients, medical practice has passed beyond choice towards compulsion. The University of California (and others) are mandating that students receive the Moderna bivalent vaccine despite knowing that it has only been tested on eight mice, whilst its predecessor posed serious risks to the cardiac health of the young.

The efforts of the medical system to normalise Covid vaccine injury beggar imagination. Here is a link to a New York hospital advertisement advising very young children they can live with myocarditis and still be successful in the world of fashion. No discussion of its cause and prognosis, merely it’s OK, and according to the NY hospital treatable, yet the prestigious Mayo Clinic website admits myocarditis is not a mild illness.

Misleading PR is what we have come to expect in a modern health system. Just remember the economics of the system prioritise profit, which inevitably means maximising customers. A demand which can only be met if there is more illness.

We learn through success, but if you do make a mistake be sure to correct it

Barring a miracle, it is possibly a vain hope to suggest that those who have asserted their power during the pandemic are going to change direction. They might eventually concede that some mistakes were made, as is clear from this article in the Lancet, but the overall thrust of biotechnology is not being questioned.

An article from the BBC entitled “Could mRNA make us superhuman?” names the biotech direction of medicine a RNAissance which promises the cure of all disease. As if social media popularity is the new yardstick of science, it quotes a Canadian science explainer with 235,000 followers and 3.7 million likes on TikTok:

“A lot of people were sceptical as to whether it could ever work. Now the whole field of mRNA is just exploding. It’s a game changer in medicine…A once-in-a-generation wave of scientific progress.”

According to the article, the list of diseases for which mRNA vaccines are being developed is a very long one. No complaint is too small to mention—lactose intolerance, high cholesterol, cancers, allergies, HIV, zika, herpes, malaria, common bacterial infections, and so on.

Scientist Dr. Dragony Fu envisions that various mRNA vaccines will be mixed together into a single health booster vaccine, which could ward off cancers and viruses at the same time.

The fantasies of biotech gurus extend from ‘vaccines tailored to individuals’ to ‘spraying the whole population from the skies’ to ‘foods cultured by robots in steaming biotech vats’—imagine the convenience.

Also imagine for a moment how many biotechnologists we will need in this future dystopia and how much they will need to be paid, would there be anyone left wise enough to grow ordinary food in soil or even anyone left at all?

When I lived in Iowa, at that time, the staff canteen at the Monsanto HQ served organic food—they know.

The American economy has been ordered to adopt biotechnology.

Last week President Biden issued an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe, and Secure American Bioeconomy“.

The aim is to create innovative solutions in health, climate change, energy, food security, agriculture, supply chain resilience, and national and economic security in a way that maintains United States technological leadership and economic competitiveness.

This paragraph sums up the US government agenda:

“We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers; unlock the power of biological data, including through computing tools and artificial intelligence; and advance the science of scale‑up production while reducing the obstacles for commercialization so that innovative technologies and products can reach markets faster.”

The detailed executive order mandates nothing less than the reorientation of the entire US economy behind bioengineering. The directors of almost every sector of the economy have been ordered to report back to the President with budgets, initiatives, and progress within 90 to 180 days. They will no doubt be adding the prefix ‘bio’ to their portfolio titles after the style of the White House directive—bioeconomy, bioagriculture and so on.

Consequences of genetic editing cannot be recalled, they persist through generations. As we have seen, mistakes and disasters are inevitable.

The BBC article rates mRNA technology as ‘safer’ than traditional vaccines, an extraordinary claim incompatible with the real world rate of mRNA vaccine adverse effects which is running at 50 times higher than any previous vaccine.

So all cause mortality is at record levels in highly vaccinated countries around the world, but Biden and the BBC are heralding a new renaissance? Longevity has begun to decline. It was happening as far back as 2014 and now it is accelerating, signalling the end of normalcy as we remember it (if it ever deserved the title normal).

It is more like the collective madness of lemmings. We do know that large groups of people, even nations, can rise to frenzies of collective cruelty, but throw in a jab of gene juice and it seems that the world can enjoy destroying itself.

The hype is overwhelming and intoxicating. Well-funded science explainers and recently appointed anti-conspiracy editors have gone into hyperdrive and left any sense of caution behind. MSM outlets including the BBC and even government agencies have colluded with Facebook to ensure that social media support sites are shut down that aim to help those injured by the Covid vaccine or relatives of those who have died.

This gives us an idea about just how determined and brutal our new medically inspired truthsayers and masters can be. If you were rebuked earlier for drawing parallels with the Nazi state or mentioning 1984, you should now be feeling completely vindicated.

The future of medicine in a post-pandemic world

As long as our medical options are controlled by the profit-hungry pharmaceutical wolf, everyone is facing a very bleak and risky future, including those of us with other opinions and alternative medical needs. A future controlled by the giant US economy re-orientated to alter human genetics, our food supply, and earth’s climate.

The oceans are subject to deep sea trawling that is gradually destroying the fish population. No species is left untouched. The only success story has been the creation of marine reserves, areas where no fishing is allowed. To work, these have to be very large areas.

No such option exists with biotech, there are no safe havens. Genetic material is highly mobile and invasive, once released it spreads everywhere and can never be recalled.

It won’t have escaped your notice that whilst biotech medicine has its high profile advocates (many of them well paid for their services), an increasing segment of the population, pushing towards 50%, is very fed up with risky vaccines that don’t actually work. They are voting with their feet, refusing boosters, sheltering their children, and in some cases becoming more vocal.

Medical choice has been politicised during the pandemic. Our political allegiances (left, right, or center) have been cleverly manipulated. Believing that well-lobbied politicians currently running medical systems will be sensible is a vain hope. The pandemic should at least have taught us that.

Our only safe option is to vote for a biotechnology ban. A global political party with a single health issue—ban biotech and de-couple medicine from big pharma. Even 25% support would be a game-changing political force.

I leave you with this sobering thought. Thérèse Coffey, the new UK health secretary has taken her first faltering step to halt the post-pandemic NHS crisis. She has written to civil servants advising them to avoid the Oxford comma at all costs (the Oxford comma is the last comma before the ‘and’ in a list of things. Remember Emperor Nero who fiddled while Rome burned?).

If we want to live in a safe world, we will have to stand up, speak out, and vote with our feet. No one else is going to rise to the occasion for us.

Donation Options

The Pandemic Has Opened Pandora’s Box

Guy Hatchard
-
0
The Pandemic Has Opened Pandora’s Box

Most vaccinated or unvaccinated people are probably taking a deep breath (without a mask) and wondering where to from here?

The pharmaceutical/biotechnology lobby will not be pausing for a minute, they will be redoubling their efforts on all fronts while unsuspecting citizens are trying to recover from the deprivations of the last three years.

One out of many aims of the biotech lobby is to persuade everyone that any negative effects (and deaths) associated with the pandemic resulted from Covid infection and nothing else. Counter narratives will continue to be dismissed as conspiracy theories. In order to secure the whitewash, no method, however underhand, will be left unused.

As we have frequently noted, the biotech lobby is anxious to dismiss any idea that Covid resulted from a lab escape. If it did (and the evidence is frankly overwhelming), the whole pandemic resulted from risky biotech experiments A to Z.

If so, whichever side of the argument you are on, vaccinated or unvaccinated, you should be asking for a ban on risky biotechnology experimentation.

To counter this, those in receipt of biotechnology grants and funding, and related income sources, are busting their gut to sing the praises of mRNA technology and hide the adverse effects.

A paper published on August 4 2022 entitled “BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Against COVID-19 is Associated with Decreased Likelihood of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in U.S. Children Ages 5-18 Years” is a case in point.

Mathematician and substack blogger Igor Chudov has analysed the paper in depth and at length. He found that the study overstated the benefit of “Covid vaccines”, purposely undercounted Covid vaccinated children who had Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C), and used incorrect calculations to arrive at the purported benefit.

When calculated properly, children who received Covid vaccines have a greater, not lower risk of MIS-C, compared to unvaccinated children.

Let’s just look at one of the ways the outcomes are distorted in the study. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children is a condition where different body parts can become inflamed, including the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, or gastrointestinal organs. It can be deadly. Its cause is unknown.

The study designated anyone who received an mRNA vaccine less than 14 days prior as unvaccinated and also anyone with just one dose. Look at the graph from the paper with Chudov’s annotations in red:

The blue dots are cases of MIS-C. You can see that the closer you are to the vaccination date, cases are more frequently clustered. There is every reason to suppose that cases may be more frequent even closer than 14 days, but the authors of the study excluded these.

The study reported 24 cases of MIS-C among the vaccinated and 280 cases among the unvaccinated. When the excluded data was reinstated and other data corrected, Chudov found 181 MIS-C cases among the vaccinated and 182 among the unvaccinated.

Since there were far fewer vaccinated children among the initial study participants, the relative risk of suffering MIS-C was 1.43 times higher among the vaccinated. The opposite conclusion of that reported in the published study.

Another way you can hide the effects of mRNA vaccination is to simply ignore the fact that it could have had an effect. A study “Neurological and psychiatric risk trajectories after SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of 2-year retrospective cohort studies including 1 284 437 patients” takes this approach. The authors tacitly assume that mRNA vaccination did not play any role in the observed incidences of neurological and psychiatric illness, despite microbiological and statistical evidence that it could and does.

For more evidence of efforts to cover up deficiencies in assessment of risks, read this article by Dr. Mercola. It is written in a style that is easy to assimilate without overloading the reader with obscure technicalities. In essence, different batches of mRNA vaccines had radically different adverse effect rates and genetic characteristics. Some batches were disproportionately associated with severe outcomes.

It also covers the implications of the Pfizer release documents which reveal just how many severe adverse effects and deaths following mRNA vaccine trials were hidden and/or excluded.

The approach of the pharmaceutical PR lobby to articles like these is to dismiss them as the work of conspiracy theorists never answering the detailed questions raised concerning publicly available data. A tactic that works very well if you have been able to pay off the media.

By November 2021, Bill Gates had spent $319 million on direct grants to media and he is just one player among a great many. We know about his payments because they come from his foundation which publishes accounts. Pharmaceutical company PR efforts reportedly consume a higher proportion of total revenue than the total research budgets. They spend more money on PR than they do on medical research. This involves expenditures which dwarf those of Gates, but whose details are not so easy to find.

The CDC, FDA, and other government health agencies around the world, who benefit from Big Pharma largess, have joined in by sending misinformation to Facebook and other social media outlets designed to encourage them to delete posts counter to government policy.

The full extent of the intention to transform our medical system into a biotechnology juggernaut is spelt out in this article in Nature Communications “A global forum on synthetic biology: the need for international engagement”. The article proposes: A global forum on synthetic biology to discuss policy futures at the highest level across international borders to usher in the age of engineering biology.

Saying: “2020 marks the first moment in human civilisation when in silico-designed biological code was used to address human biological vulnerability en masse via an mRNA substrate.”

The hubris in this article is breathtaking as is the intention to capture policymakers and regulators around the world under the roof of one synthetic biotech umbrella.

Just to give you a short introduction to the age of engineering biology, read this article in Town and Country (yes a publication covering High Society) entitled “How a Diabetes Drug Became the New Weight Loss Trend for the Rich“. The article describes how a diabetes drug Ozempic is being used off-label to gain the slim figure of a true socialite at a cost of just $1000 a month.

The article doesn’t tell you that one of the known side effects of regular use of Ozempic is thyroid cancer, but then again what is cancer compared to the perfect figure in the age of synthetic biotech engineering?

The pandemic has allowed the commercial arm of biotechnology to legitimize its control of medicine, but it doesn’t stop there. Biotech is also busy cornering the food business. When I worked for Genetic ID, I used to attend the Natural Products Expo West. A giant annual trade show in Anaheim California for all things organic. The show has been cancelled for two years, but it started up again this year.

Completely unexpected was the presence of companies selling GMO 2.0 or synthetic biology technologies. This is genetically engineered food rebranded as precise and safe without any safety testing—synthetic meats and ingredients made in giant biotech vats worthy of sci-fi extravaganzas.

The bad news—it is already on our supermarket shelves and there are no labels to warn you, just the misleading PR that you will be saving the world from climate change if you buy in. Synthetic ingredients are often labelled as ‘natural’ a misuse of the term, but they are not.

Just remember that the pandemic should have taught us just how vulnerable we are to novel biotechnology. We have been eating fresh natural foods for millions of years. We enjoy a healthy mutual co-evolutionary relationship with traditional food sources. Overturn that at our peril.

It is time to reevaluate the huge influence the biotech lobby wields over government policy and regulation. This is not a time to leave the door open for influence peddling, cronyism, and corruption which disregards the very real and severe adverse effects on human health—genetic dysfunction that can also be inherited by subsequent generations.

Guy Hatchard PhD is formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Donation Options

Message to a Relieved But Grieving Nation – Just Published Research Raises Alarming Red Flags

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Message to a Relieved But Grieving Nation – Just Published Research Raises Alarming Red Flags

Leading scientists sound the alarm on Covid vaccine safety.

Covid restrictions are largely coming to an end in New Zealand. Thank you for some sanity. Never before have novel medical concepts been so intertwined with naive political allegiances and never before have careerist medical professionals been able to exercise total control over politicians. Good riddance.

Does this draw the curtains on the pandemic and have we learnt the right lessons? Not yet.

Boosters and Excess Deaths

When Jacinda Ardern announced the end of restrictions yesterday at a press briefing she was asked about our record high rates of excess deaths, but she ducked the question and changed the subject. Mainstream media needs to push harder on this line of questioning and Jacinda is not the only person they should be asking.

She was also asked by some worried and fawning journalist when we would all be able to get our next booster. Her lightning reply showed just how much the truth is beginning to dawn: “there will be very few needing to go that way”.

The double speak on boosters, even in scientific journals, is wonderfully scary to behold. A research letter published September 8 2022 in JAMA Network Open illustrates the point. A study of risk factors for death after Omicron Covid-19 infection found that the elderly were most at risk to die after receiving a booster. The double speak comes in the conclusion: the elderly should be prioritised for further booster doses. I don’t need to explain how distressing and sad this is, do I?

The author’s analysis of UK ONS data on 19 million people only covered deaths attributed to Covid, it didn’t cover all cause deaths. A look at the same ONS data shows unequivocally that boosting is a risk factor not just for Covid death but substantially for any death. 50% of people are boosted in the UK but they account for 86% of all cause deaths. Boosting is a double whammy.

No wonder Jacinda said very few will need another booster, she knows. I wrote to her a few weeks ago with the statistics and her office replied in double quick time—we’ve asked Ayesha Verril to look into it. The penny has dropped, but it is probably too early for governments to publicly admit they have been duped by biotech vaccine fanatics intent on maintaining the government funding gravy train.

Those Injured and Left Behind

Tens of thousands adversely affected by unnecessary vaccine mandates and those injured by vaccines have been ignored and left behind. This has been an exercise in intolerance and an abrogation of medical ethics. They have been ignored and rejected. The level of vaccination adverse effects reported to CARM has run at fifty times the rates pre-pandemic. This called out loudly for prospective studies of injury. These were rejected by government and medical professionals alike.

But a recent prospective study of 300 students in Thailand reveals a horror story—almost a third of mRNA vaccine recipients experience cardiac effects. The long term consequences remain unknown.

A paper published yesterday, authored by some of the world’s top scientists at among others Oxford, Johns Hopkins and Harvard Universities, presents a risk-benefit analysis of boosters and mandates for university students.

It finds that for every one hospitalisation prevented by Covid vaccination, there are between 18 to 98 serious adverse events.

It concludes that Covid vaccine mandates applied to university students are unethical. They have created unjustified and alarming social and medical harms.

You should be worried about the serious flow on health issues associated with mRNA vaccination, but perhaps you should be less worried about long Covid than first thought. A study entitled “Associations of Depression, Anxiety, Worry, Perceived Stress, and Loneliness Prior to Infection With Risk of Post–COVID-19 Conditions” has found that the more you worry the more likely you are to report that you suffer from long Covid. So stoking the Covid fear factor actually increases the risks. Another lesson to learn.

What Should Happen Next?

Our current rate of cancer incidence is unknown, but, if overseas VAERS data can be trusted, it will be increasing dramatically. Figures are not being shared with the public. They should be.

Vaccination status is not recorded on death certificates, a prerequisite for causal research. Why not? We wrote to the government in August on this issue.

Sudden death has been normalised in the media and no one appears to be asking the difficult questions. They need to be asked, read here for a discussion.

The government has left it up to employers to decide whether they should continue to discriminate against the unvaccinated but studies in Qatar show that the unvaccinated enjoy 97.5% protection against reinfection. They should get their jobs back. But employers are still being daily spooked by misleading Covid vaccine advertising.

Remove the Financial Incentives to Exaggerate Covid

People who worry about grim sounding Covid statistics should know that pandemic payments to hospitals, doctors, and other government departments only drive Covid statistics up. It’s simple economics. In the USA, hospitals receive a 20% increase in the Medicare payment rate for every patient diagnosed with Covid. Maximising Covid has become a medical business model and a strategy to buy political support.

Anil Makam, MD, MAS, is an academic hospital medicine physician and a health services researcher at UCSF Department of Medicine. His research is at the intersection of geriatrics, hospital medicine, and post-acute care, specifically focusing on the role of long-term acute care hospitals (LTACs). He tweets (for the benefit of those still trying to exaggerate Covid), in the whole of the 2022 Omicron era I have only seen one case of Covid pneumonia….Good news severe Covid is gone.

Here in New Zealand, the plethora of special Covid payments and incentives needs to stop now. Covid costs (including advertising and media payouts) have topped $70 billion (50% of the annual government revenue) and it’s all borrowed money. The Covid industry has all but taken over the nation. Long ago it detached itself from primary Covid data sources on safety and gained almost unstoppable momentum by waving unsubstantiated fear flags everywhere.

Where Did Covid Come From?

Savvy commentators are not fooled by repeated attempts to reassure the public that they should ‘blame a bat’, bats are innocent. Read this eight step explanation on Twitter from Richard H. Ebright, it’s short and to the point. He is on the Board of Governors and Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University and Laboratory Director at the Waksman Institute of Microbiology.

There is more to say on this. Covid-19 was circulating worldwide way before the official pandemic start date in early 2020. Blood samples from France and Italy taken during September to December 2019 contain Covid-19 antibodies. This further undermines the timeline of the natural origin hypothesis and places the pandemic start closer to known respiratory illness episodes among staff at the Wuhan Lab.

If you want a glimpse into a lab horror story, watch The Anthrax Attacks documentary on Netflix. As far back as the 1990’s researchers were busy weaponizing deadly pathogens in a supposed attempt to develop vaccines. This was occurring in military laboratories in the USA, and if you think that this wasn’t and isn’t going on in military circles all round the world, think again.

The full horror of this kind of research surfaced during the pandemic. Genetic sequences are highly mobile, cannot be contained, and are passed on to subsequent generations.

If you think we can exit the pandemic without banning risky biotechnology research and covert bioweapon programmes, you’re mad.

There is a long list here that government policy needs to acknowledge and take account of. It is not enough to exit the pandemic by stopping restrictions. Public perceptions and strong divisive opinions have been created that don’t match Covid science publishing. It is time to redress injustice, correct the public record, and face up to continuing health challenges.

The government may find it hard to stop the runaway gravy train, the misinformation, and the fear mongering they initiated and encouraged. It has taken on a life of its own, but it must be countered, stopped, and dismantled.

Donation Options

Where to From Here?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Where to From Here?

Is anyone in authority going to change gear? On current evidence, possibly not.

Our future appears to include reduced longevity and reduced birth rates, along with generous doses of genetic vaccines which will only hurry along our journey back to 19th century health statistics.

The central role of governments post pandemic appears to be to make sure no one finds out what has gone on and what is still going on. The FDA has refused to release its vaccine safety analyses for public viewing, hiding behind legal arguments designed to circumvent freedom of information requests.

On the publishing front, a headline in online Medpage Today (distributed worldwide to doctors) misleadingly tumpeted “Unvaccinated Over 10 Times More Likely to Be Hospitalized During Omicron”. I read the study which the article was based on, published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

The study was funded by the CDC and the authors received grants from the pharmaceutical industry. It covered Covid hospitalisations in parts of the USA from January to April 2022. Predictably the content didn’t justify the screaming headline. Here is a quote from the study:

“Multivariate analysis found vaccination was not significantly associated with a reduced risk of severe disease (ie, ICU admission or death)”

In January the proportion of Delta infections was still high and the administration of boosters was relatively recent. Predictably, any relative protection offered by boosters wore off rapidly and very significantly from January on.

No doubt, as studies in other countries show, the subsequent four months up until today would find the effect of boosters sinking into negative territory, while the unmentionable and unprecedented rise in all-cause deaths would remain unreported.

In other words, mRNA vaccination undermines your health, but this didn’t stop Medpage Today advising us to ‘stay up to date with our vaccinations and boosters’—a mantra that has long since passed its sell-by date.

How Medicine Got Left Behind in a Dull Mechanistic Newtonian World

From your letters it seems many of you are asking, like me: How are we all going to thrive going ahead and avert a looming dystopia?

Official medical policy decisions affecting us are all taken by individuals somewhere. All decisions originate in the mind. Understanding how to shift the goal posts is going to require a giant leap in our understanding of consciousness—individual and collective.

It is hard to communicate the excitement I felt as an undergraduate physics major when I was introduced to Schroedinger’s cat. Essentially this involved a paradox that arose from Quantum Theory. When you look at something (or technically speaking when you ‘measure’ it) you alter it, but until then it exists in a virtual combination of all possible outcomes described by a wave function.

When our consciousness intervenes, it collapses the abstract wave function into a single definite event (if you want to look at a modern experimental verification of the key role of consciousness in quantum mechanical reality look here).

This paradox was resolved by describing the world as a wave/particle duality. Sometimes the world behaves as a wave in a limitless invisible ocean and sometimes as a set of billiard balls bouncing off each other on an infinite table. Or more correctly, the two worlds coexist continuously.

For Newton, the world was always a vast tangible almost clockwork machine obeying a set of fixed rules. In a Quantum world anything is possible, even if the more ordinary everyday mechanical outcomes are more likely to eventuate.

Particles or objects that can be seen and touched characterise the world around us, but at smaller time and distance scales subtle fields orchestrate the cosmic dance. Nowhere more so than in our physiology. Consciousness holds a special place in physics and it operates at the heart of physiology.

Consciousness is the most abstract of fields, yet it connects with the most mundane of bodily functions and the most sublime human emotions. As a physicist you cannot consider the coordinated complexity of human physiology without thinking of field effects.

Quantum field effects can be associated with the creation of coherent states such as superconductivity and superfluidity. This involves the joining of microscopic particles into a macroscopic quantum coherent state. Such states operate at everyday distance scales. Their almost magical effects such as frictionless flow are visible to the eye.

DNA is at the heart of every one of the 37 trillion human cells, yet each of us is recognisable as a single unique person. The whole person is more than a collection of cells. Our cells are orchestrated together, just as millions of atoms can be under the influence of a single coherent quantum field.

The connection between consciousness and physiology is mediated by our genetics. Interfere with genetics and you imperil the intimate connection between consciousness and matter, mind and body.

Health is a combination of abstract consciousness and physiological homeostasis or balance. No one could imagine that physiology is a set of billiard balls, yet modern medicine mostly regards it in that light—periodically throwing in pharmaceutical billiard balls as if they alone will restore health.

At the same time ignoring dire adverse effects—a list of adverse effects in very small print graced our newspapers yesterday next to a large print call to ask for Paxlovid (there were no benefits listed):

“Possible side effects include vomiting; diarrhea; headache; high blood pressure; aching muscle, muscle tenderness or weakness not due to exercise; changes in taste or a metallic taste in the mouth; severe allergic reaction, signs and/or symptoms of allergic reaction include rash, itch, development of hives, swelling of the face (or of the tongue, lips, eyes, throat), feeling breathless, light-headed or dizzy, feeling unwell, nausea and abdominal pain.”

Robust health primarily depends upon diet, exercise, fresh air, and happiness. It can be degraded by highly processed foods, indolence, pollution, fatigue, and stress. Consciousness guides us through every day and every stage of life. Taking care of our consciousness is the vital necessity of every person.

Every cultural and spiritual tradition places the ascent of consciousness at the heart and height of human achievement. Therefore when shock jock Michael Laws said on The Platform this week that my interest in meditation and natural health disqualified me from science, he was denying the validity of culture, religion, and morality.

He was denying the historic achievements of people like St Francis of Asisi, Mahatma Gandhi, Hildegard of Bingen, Leo Tolstoy, and countless others who have cast their light down through the ages to guide and protect our highest cultural, moral, and spiritual endeavours.

He was also ignoring the vast scientific literature which has discovered measurable value in quiet reflection and natural life. Such as greatly reduced incidence of cancers if you eat five portions of fresh fruit and vegetables a day, or reduced anxiety and mental illness through meditation. My book Your DNA Diet discusses and references these at length.

Despite the fashion of scepticism and the idolatry of technology, our legacy of cultural and spiritual knowledge and the lessons of history are desperately needed now.

The Power of Truth and Self Discovery is Not Weak and Ineffectual as Some Would Have Us Believe

In 1990 I worked in Soviet Armenia for a year on an earthquake relief project and received a lesson in the power of meditation now and in history. My team taught over 35,000 people to meditate as part of a government sponsored programme to relieve the debilitating PTSD caused by a devastating earthquake in 1989 in which over 25,000 people died.

During my visit I was invited to visit the historic monastery of Khor Virap at the foot of snow capped Mt. Ararat. In the third century, St Grigor the illuminator was imprisoned in an underground cave for 13 years. He was eventually released and somehow cured the cruel pagan monarch of his mental illness. With the result that the nation converted to Christianity.

I climbed down a long vertical shaft in solid rock to visit St. Grigor’s tiny underground prison. Sitting there, my companion and I had an experience of deep quiet and inner light. Throughout Armenia today you can see caves cut into rocky cliffs that once harboured anchorites and christian mystics inspired by St. Grigor’s light. This sat easily in Armenia with a long tradition of meditation stretching back to ancient Vedic times.

I record this not with any intention to convert, but with a purpose to inspire the need for an understanding and experience of expanded consciousness. As consciousness lies at the centre of physics, it underpins our DNA which is constructed of particles and fields governed by the laws of physics.

As I have reported elsewhere, there is evidence that research in consciousness may offer a key to reset the integrity of our genetics.

Recovery from the pandemic can involve meditation, natural diet, physiological purification of toxins, doing what you enjoy, and collective cultural endeavours to restore the health of society. Denying their validity or utility amounts to a denial of the history of civilisation and the spirit of scientific endeavour.

Guy Hatchard Ph.D. was formerly  a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

What Should Matter in Journalism

Guy Hatchard
-
0
What Should Matter in Journalism

This week I was briefly distracted by former politician and now shock jock Michael Laws who announced to the world that I was a “madman, conspiracy theorist, untrained in anything, with a tendency to make things up”.

Apparently, Laws took exception to the university where I studied for my PhD in research psychology—Maharishi International University. If you want to make up your own mind about MIU, an accredited university in Iowa, you can visit this link.

According to Laws, my occasional advocacy of natural food, yoga, and meditation, and their relevance to health policy, is weird. It should disqualify anyone from commenting on scientific matters whatever academic, technical, and professional expertise they might have. As if disagreeing with Laws is sufficient to neutralise academic qualifications like my doctorate. A good job he is not running our universities.

If you want to know more about my academic and professional qualifications, I have already publicly defended them following enquiries by a journalist. You can view the question and answer exchange here.

Laws’ comments are part of a current fashion to run down anyone who questions Covid vaccine safety. This is designed to distract from the real issues and the failure of journalists to investigate them.

His comments arose in the context of a listener calling in concerned about excess death rates in New Zealand. I have written extensively on the subject during the last few weeks at HatchardReport.com. Here is my position on Laws’ comments in brief:

Dictionary.com says ‘conspiracy theorists reject the standard explanation for an event and instead credit a covert group or organization with carrying out a secret plot’. It seems to me that Laws might be a conspiracy theorist himself as incredibly he implied today on his show that excess deaths are solely the result of Covid.

The weekly rate of excess all-cause death in New Zealand reached 946 in late August. That is 35% above the long term seasonally adjusted rate. A concerning figure.

Laws referred to Epidemiologist Dr Michael Baker as the significant expert who had reassured him that the record rate of excess deaths is due to Covid infection alone. Are the two of them part of a wider covert group carrying out a secret plot? You decide.

In a rational scientific forum, the Laws/Baker position on the sole cause of excess deaths being Covid could be judged speculative, certainly unproven, and likely untenable. There is insufficient evidence to support the contention, and indeed a great deal of evidence which refutes it.

A definitive scientific determination of the factors driving the record levels of excess deaths would require as a minimum the following information:

  • Information on death certificates recording vaccination status
  • Up to date compilation of cause of death information by category compared to historical data
  • Breakdown of these stats by age.

These figures have not been made available in New Zealand. However, they are available from some overseas sources:

  • UK ONS figures show that UK high rates of all-cause death are very disproportionately affecting the vaccinated and especially the boosted.
  • US VAERS data indicates hugely elevated rates of cancers
  • German data indicates that surges in death rates are consistently connected to upward movements in vaccination rates
  • US insurance industry data indicates that working age and young people are suffering elevated death rates unrelated to Covid

We should not be so isolated in our outlook here in New Zealand that these official overseas figures are of no concern to us. More importantly, we cannot look to journalists for definitive information on the subject. Earlier this week I wrote on the necessity to reference primary data sources.

Scientists like myself are hoping for a new serious measured style of journalism that exhibits a modicum of depth, caution, and balance, but journalists are 3 or 4 times removed from primary sources and not really stepping up to the plate.

The Platform says it is “offering unbiased coverage commentary and opinion and the chance to have your say on the issues that affect you…It aims to beat the hatred and division fuelled by taxpayer funded media and woke culture warriors who want to stifle debate and suffocate democracy.”

Earlier today I spoke to Sean Plunket, founder and of The Platform—the radio outlet employing Michael Laws. He felt that Laws is entitled to air his opinion however far it drifts away from matters of fact—a disturbing indictment of journalism in general.

Disturbing because there are human lives at stake here, thousands of all-cause deaths in excess of historical trends. These can’t be airily dismissed by a radio talk show host who is projecting an aura of certainty and authority he doesn’t deserve and is unable to reliably back up with facts and figures.

The good news—to resolve the impasse, Sean Plunkett assured me he will arrange a head to head moderated exchange between Laws and I next week. I wonder whether Laws will agree to it? If it happens, we look forward to it.

Guy Hatchard Ph.D. was formerly  a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Cause of Death—Can it be Genetic Dysregulation?

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Cause of Death—Can it be Genetic Dysregulation?

Over the last few weeks the Hatchard Report has been discussing high rates of excess all-cause death around the world.

The connection with Covid vaccination is statistically evident and the evidence is mounting. This is not only affecting the aged but also young and working age people. Rather than rehashing the arguments you can catch up via this substack article which explains how the emerging data on injury and death is becoming too hard to ignore.

The high rate of all-cause deaths, some of which are sudden and unexpected, has increased the workload of coroners. Dr. Judy Melinek is a US coroner who moved to New Zealand in 2020 to take up a position in Wellington. An extract from her 22 August 2022 blog at Medpage Today illustrates the challenges coroners face:

“The Ministry of Health, meanwhile, has changed how they count COVID-19 deaths, distinguishing who is dying of COVID-19 and who is dying with COVID-19. I’m a professional who has to make legally-mandated decisions about these kinds of things, and even I am struggling to parse that policy. Here’s a hypothetical example drawn from several cases I’ve done recently. A young adult man comes to my autopsy table. He had been apparently healthy and died suddenly. When I open him up, there’s nothing inside — no gross anatomic findings on autopsy that would explain his death. Under the microscope, however, I do find evidence of scarring in the heart tissue. When the body came to the hospital and then into our mortuary, he had two COVID-19 PCR swabs; one came back positive and one came back negative. So, we can surmise that this dead guy is harboring a low viral load — but is that an indication of a recent, healing infection or a “historic,” remote one? And how does it play into the cause of death?….

“Too many what-ifs. In my field, we don’t like what-ifs. We’re supposed to provide final answers to coroners and to the decedents’ families. Knowing that what I write on the death certificate becomes part of the public record and actually influences the numbers our national health authorities generate makes me super cautious. I show the case to other pathologists. I schedule a peer review. I do extra stains and tests for viral PCR on the tissue — tests I would not have had to run 2 years ago — and I agonize over every word in the opinion on my autopsy report. Even routine cases for a forensic pathologist, like motor vehicle accidents and drug overdoses, get extra scrutiny if they test positive for COVID-19, or if they received a vaccination and the family or coroner wants me to answer whether the death had something to do with that.”

Dr. Melinek is certainly a Covid vaccine supporter and has given public interviews decrying conspiracy theorists and anti vaxxers, but her report indicates that key decision makers at the pathology end of all-cause deaths are sometimes unsure and becoming super cautious.

Others are making up their minds. Dr. Alex Washburne is a mathematical biologist and the founder and chief scientist at Selva Analytics. He researches Covid epidemiology, the economic impacts of pandemic policy, and stock market response to epidemiological news. He wrote on Twitter yesterday:

“As the dominoes fall, there’s a very real chance that the people we thought

heroes in the pandemic were actually villains. There’s also a real chance the researchers with the most-cited papers are actually guilty of the worst research misconduct of the century.”

There is an interesting contrast here between someone who cuts up dead bodies and looks for clues and someone who analyses public Covid data and advises financial markets. The one becoming more cautious, the other becoming more suspicious.

Pathologists are not trained to analyse social data, and epidemiologists are not trained to examine internal organs, but given the complexity and novelty of the pandemic they certainly need to listen to each other very carefully.

Primary Data Sources are Very Important

Both of them are dealing with primary data sources, which brings us to a huge problem with the formation of the pandemic response policy. A lot of policy is being formulated based on out-of-date secondary and tertiary sources which no longer match up with primary data sources.

The primary sources are objective data sets from both research projects and public data collection. Some of these may involve subjective judgements on the part of physicians, but let’s hope that these are made carefully as Dr. Melinek reports she does.

Secondary sources involve published analysis of the data sets. These are scrutinised through peer review both formally and informally, but as Dr. Washburne reports even these can be subject to bias and misconduct. However, inconsistencies and inaccuracies, whether unintended or not, usually surface as time goes by, as evidenced by the 500+ drugs released then withdrawn from the market since 1950.

Tertiary sources involve administrative decisions taken by health advisors and experts. These are further from the primary source data and can involve professional bias. We have certainly seen a lot of this during the pandemic.

One step further away from the data, politicians and media explainers make their own assessments, advocate policies, and relay these to the public. We are now many steps away from up-to-date information in the rapidly evolving Covid data landscape. Political and commercial agendas are being funded in the media. Huge mistakes can and are being made. Mistakes that are evidently costing lives, as the rising excess all-cause death data shows.

This recent answer from the Green Party in the Rural Greens blog in response to the coronial inquest into a death attributed to mRNA vaccine side effects illustrates this point:

“Thousands of lives saved, one death in over 4 million vaccinations not even counting the boosters. You could hardly avoid all the information on the ministry website, articles in Stuff, TV and radio. This is sad for the family, just as it is sad for those families who lost completely healthy people to Covid world wide. Let us be clear once and for all, the Green Party is encouraging all sorts of vaccinations because they have proven to be effective and in some cases leading to elimination of diseases.”

In other words, this Green Party spokesperson relies on tertiary sources and MSM. They even got the Ministry of Health’s advice wrong, assuring us that there has been only one death in New Zealand as a result of mRNA vaccination—a preposterous assertion incompatible with primary data.

Political posturing like this has hardened public opinion, but it has done little to foster real understanding of the risks.

Effects of mRNA Interventions can be Inherited

The pathologist and the epidemiologist (as well as the Green Party spokesperson) we have already met, might do well to talk to the geneticists who published on 20th August 2022 a paper entitled “Pre-exposure to mRNA-LNP inhibits adaptive immune responses and alters innate immune fitness in an inheritable fashion“.

This is a study of the effect of Lipid Nanoparticles (included in Covid mRNA vaccines to facilitate the entry of genetic information into cells) on immune system function in mice. It concluded

“In summary, the mRNA-LNP vaccine platform induces long-term unexpected immunological changes affecting both adaptive immune responses and heterologous protection against infections. Thus, our studies highlight the need for more research to determine this platform’s true impact on human health.”

In other words, whatever mRNA vaccine achieves, good or bad, it could be passed on through generations. A frightening prospect—mistakes may never go away and could haunt future generations.

How can Pathologists Accurately Determine the Cause of Pandemic Deaths?

After the autopsy, what is a cautious pathologist going to write down when it comes to describing the cause of an unexpected death in the time of Covid?

Firstly, there is no requirement to record vaccination status on the death certificate, so a vital primary source of data is being discarded. Secondly and crucially the actual ‘cause of death descriptions’ that a pathologist has to choose from are limited by training and prior experience. There hasn’t been a mass use of genetic vaccines before the pandemic—so they are not recognised as a cause of death in the normal course of things.

Let’s illustrate the dilemma pathologists face. This is part of a diagram I used when lecturing at university. It is designed to simply illustrate the key role of DNA in orchestrating all parts of the physiology:

Cause of Death—Can it be Genetic Dysregulation

The complexity involved in physiology is immense, but the hierarchical dependence on the information contained in DNA and its expression through RNA is obvious. Modify the RNA pathways through which DNA expresses itself, and you can see that every level of physiological function can potentially be affected.

As you go up this chart from levels 3 to 4 to 5, you reach larger time and distance scales which can be observed by a pathologist with the naked eye or through a microscope. Go down the chart, entities are smaller and cycle more quickly, they are not visible to the naked eye (levels not shown here below DNA are the areas covered by physics).

The pathologist is mainly examining organs and tissues (the higher elements of level 4). Post mortem test options are limited, although pathologists do have access to medical history and the results of tests conducted during life. There is no question of being able to examine the specific role that genetic manipulation (Level 3) might have played in any death. Pathologists don’t have the genetic expertise or the tools to determine this.

Nor is there any precedent to indicate this might be at issue. Mass human mRNA vaccination is novel, so pathologists are in almost completely uncharted territory. Not only that, but they have been constantly bombarded with assurances that mRNA Covid vaccination must be safe, by definition. Assurances that primary data is now calling into question.

In a prescriptive medical professional environment, no pathologist is going to risk writing an autopsy report that implicates Covid vaccination (unless it involves an absolutely clear cut unambiguous case of myocarditis without any history of Covid infection). To express doubts or to pass judgement on the role of genetic interventions is outside of their expertise. To do so could result in professional censure and possibly loss of employment.

Yet the primary data shows mRNA vaccination is associated with high all-cause death rates beyond historical levels. The unvaccinated are not suffering in this way. The inevitable question—is there a causal connection between mRNA vaccination and a very large number of deaths?

mRNA vaccination inserts a set of genetic instructions into cells that overrides the highly regulated cellular environment and stipulate the production of Covid spike proteins. We can term this ‘genetic dysregulation’.

It appears that the consequent stimulation of the immune system to respond to the Covid spike protein can lead to immunosuppression that increases with each subsequent vaccine dose. This is just one of multiple effects on physiology that are suspected, but as yet not investigated thoroughly.

Is the ultimate primary cause of death of a great many persons: ‘genetic dysregulation brought on by mRNA vaccination’? If so, there is no such standard box for a pathologist to tick and no one currently involved in certifying cause of death who could possibly attest to this.

Genetic dysregulation, or we could use the term ‘immune deficiency contingent on mRNA vaccination’, can underlie multiple symptoms and multiple disease types. High cancer rates, heart disease, bacterial infections, stroke, kidney disease, and neurological conditions can all be related to a single cause—the action of genetic vaccines at the all-powerful time and distance scales of genetic functioning.

It is not unscientific to suggest that multiple conditions can have a single cause. Hans Selye, an eminent Canadian scientist, popularised the notion that ‘stress’ contributes to a range of illnesses. He termed stress “the non-specific response of the body to any demand placed upon it”.

In the same way, sooner or later, primary data linking high all-cause death rates with mRNA vaccination must lead to a serious examination of ‘genetic dysregulation’ as an underlying cause of death. This is not a new suggestion. Italian researchers proposed post-mortem procedures to identify causal adverse effects of Covid vaccination in May 2021. However, this has had little or no effect since on autopsy procedures. This is because of the entrenched preconception that all vaccines, including novel biotech vaccines, will be safe. A preconception still shared by most medical professionals.

The geneticists, the epidemiologists, the pathologists, the administrators, and the politicians are not talking openly and honestly to one another or to the public. If they are aware that primary data shows all-cause deaths are related to mRNA vaccination, they are not talking about it, but are busy looking the other way and hoping no one will blame them. Some appear to be making sure that vital primary data is kept well hidden.

Growing evidence of serious long term Covid mRNA vaccine health risks, should be telling us that lives are at stake, many lives. The implications for public policy should be obvious, medical interventions designed to alter genetic expression and function are highly unpredictable and very risky. They can have powerful effects widely distributed in physiology.

Therefore novel biotechnology experimentation designed to create new pathogens or alter genetic function needs to be paused, and quickly. Any form of Covid vaccination mandate, public or private needs to be outlawed immediately. Covid vaccination programmes should be halted, as has happened in Denmark for the young.

Guy Hatchard Ph.D. was formerly  a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

Pandemic Reporting Needs to Meet the Burden of Proof

Guy Hatchard
-
0
Pandemic Reporting Needs to Meet the Burden of Proof

At this point in the Covid pandemic saga, the public is still faced with an information blackout.

The data is very concerning indeed, but no one in parliament or MSM wants to get in front of it. Instead many are still stuck stoking the fear factor. As Prof. Vinay Prasad, an American hematologist-oncologist and health researcher, wrote today: Legitimising irrational anxiety is bad medicine.

Early on in our efforts to publicise the dangers of biotechnology medicine, Guy had an email exchange with Jesse Mulligan, popular commentator with RNZ Afternoons. Jesse’s perspective on Covid vaccination was as follows:

Dec 6th 2021 “I feel like anybody aiming to critique such an obviously positive public health measure should begin and end their messaging reminding people that any risks/flaws in the vaccine are minor compared to the horrific impacts of getting Covid….I don’t have the time to correspond with you on this at length but, for what it’s worth, if you’re putting people off getting a largely safe vaccine by what you’re writing about it, I think you need to review how you approach writing these messages.”

Dec 7th 2021 “It’s not your caution I object to but the predictable effect it has in putting people off the vaccine…..I’d say you have the choice whether to use this data to educate and question (which I am keen on) vs lining it up to try and convince people they should fear or think twice about getting the vaccine.”

Jesse quoted from Ministry of Health directives and had also read some questioning scientific articles, but he could not get past the conclusion that vaccination was an obvious public good and for this reason, he declined to have Guy on air.

The ‘obvious public good’ narrative has come in for some recent criticism. The BMJ printed an opinion piece in July entitled “Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?“. Or try this referenced substack article which reports that the negative harm/benefit ratio in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine trials has been acknowledged in a scientific journal article. In other words, there is more harm than benefit.

We wonder what is Jesse’s assessment of current evidence? He is on our mailing list, but the correspondence has only been one way since Dec 7th.

An Underlying Assumption That Biotech Medicine Interventions Are Safe

For us, the central early point of pandemic misinformation has been the underlying assumption that biotech medicine interventions could be safe.

There really was little or no evidence to justify such an attitude, in fact, as we have discussed, there was a great deal of published pre-pandemic evidence to justify caution. It seems to me that Jesse and most other MSM pandits were probably under-informed on this point.

Given the central role of DNA in human physiology, altering its function was from the outset potentially catastrophic. We are now facing Covid vaccine outcomes that not only involve serious individual adverse effects but also potentially affect whole populations in the longer term. These outcomes include:

The evidence for these is patchy because governments are not rushing to publish data, but it is still very convincing. So concerning in fact, that the Israeli government has covered up key data and scientific conclusions.

The latest comprehensive evidence for Covid vaccine induced excess all cause mortality can be found in a just published analysis: Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022.

Sudden Deaths Among All Ages are Being Normalised

It is extraordinary how this perilous new normal has found its way into advertising messages, but not into serious commentary. Today we watched a TV ad for a funeral home which arranges alternative and appropriate funerals for those dying young, whilst a British Heart Foundation appeal featured a young woman collapsing on the football field. It did so in order to encourage donations.

Sudden deaths among all ages are being normalised in the public’s mind because they really are happening at a rate that dwarfs the past, as insurance data confirms. However here in New Zealand, we are still being subjected to puerile government advertising devoid of scientific caution. Like this MoH promotion which turned up this morning:

GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER—I’ve had three shots, do I really need another booster? Current evidence shows your protection against severe infection slowly decreases over time—GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER

No mention of safety, no mention of efficacy, and the term ‘current evidence’ is bandied about inappropriately as if this advert is scientifically up to date and reliable. It isn’t

So why has it become so unfashionable to be concerned about rising death rates and lowered birth rates? You might find a clue in this frightening pre-pandemic article from the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Corporation “Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care spending: Report”. Are higher death rates good news for people with this kind of perspective? We hope not.

Are we being too harsh? No. This involves the health and life of young people on the doorstep of a bright future.

In the Uncertain Covid Climate of Fear

When teaching, kindness and understanding go a long way towards improving communication and successful learning. We are clearly on a learning curve here. The poor vaccination outcomes were never anticipated, the adverse effects were initially disbelieved on principle, and blamed on misinformation.

We can understand that, in the uncertain Covid climate of fear, people took sides and trusted the official Ministry of Health narrative, but continuing to do so now doesn’t fit the published scientific narrative or the public data. Caution was and is a very scientific strategy, it never deserved bad press.

We’re reaching out here. Those offering advice to the public need to be more discerning if they wish to contribute to the well being and longevity of our society. MSM language has become extreme, and it is increasingly polarising without a foundation in science.

The sad reality is that medicine is a very conservative profession. Most medical procedures are locked in during training and seldom challenged for years after. Biotechnology interventions lie outside of the boundaries of past medical practice. What we need to do without anger, politics, or extremism is to talk through the fear of Covid and discuss the risks of biotechnology.

There is still a chance for seasoned journalists to cover the pandemic with an open mind. It is happening elsewhere. GB News for example has gained one of the largest prime time news audiences in the UK. Why not initiate a more open public debate? Cooling rhetoric and decreasing polarisation can only lead to better outcomes. Fresh air never harms anyone, it can save lives.

Co-Authors: Guy Hatchard and Narayani Hatchard

Donation Options
1...293031...48Page 30 of 48