Professor Jeffrey Sachs has been chair of the COVID-19 commission for leading medical journal the Lancet. Through his investigations, Prof. Sachs has come to the conclusion that there is extremely dangerous biotechnology research being kept from public view.

Read an in depth interview here:
Why the Chair of the Lancet’s COVID-19 Commission Thinks The US Government Is Preventing a Real Investigation Into the Pandemic

Professor Sachs believes that “our lives are being put at risk”, while authorities and some research scientists with vested interests are blocking further assessment of biotech safety. Our government and newspapers are going along for the ride, promoting articles containing useless and misleading public assurances of safety.

The range of biotechnology experimentation has become huge. For example, read this article, Scientists Create World’s First ‘Synthetic Embryos, about a project which has created the world’s first synthetic embryos, bypassing the need for sperm, eggs, and fertilisation.

Our whole natural food system, with which we share a co-evolutionary relationship, is under threat from biotech synthetic foods which, like mRNA vaccines, are being presumed safe rather than tested for long term outcomes.

The sky’s the limit when it comes to food options, as the cannibalistic installation of steak grown from human cells at the Design Museum in London showed. It was intended to criticize the meat industry’s rising use of living cells from animals.

Are the Lessons of Mad Cow Disease Forgotten?

Engineered genetic material is the ultimate invasion force. Sufficiently similar to real food to enable it to cross protective barriers put there by evolution, but distinctly different and sufficiently novel to cause exotic disease with unimaginable consequences.

Professor Sachs is putting his career at risk by speaking out publicly. He joins a long list of eminent highly qualified physicians and scientists who are cancelled the minute they ask questions about the safety of novel biotechnology.

This week New Zealand newspaper Stuff casually reparroted the New Zealand government line that those entertaining the Wuhan lab leak theory were conspiracy theorists who were attempting to fracture our faith (yes, faith) in science.

Such drives to censor caution are being led by unqualified science explainers writing in MSM, by social media fact checkers driven by computer algorithms, and by government scientists and medical administrators keen to protect their reputations and professional standing.

The Coronavirus Pandemic is the Entree Into a Very Risky World

It highlights both the dangers that we face and the lengths biotech companies will go to in order to promote their investments and potential profits.

Professor Shmuel Shapira MD MPH, who led Israel’s efforts to develop a coronavirus vaccine, has been summarily deleted by no less a person than Twitter for suggesting that the monkey-pox epidemic might be related to Covid vaccination.

Professor Shapira has a CV that would put most scientists to shame. You can read his CV and some of his Twitter comments here, carefully saved for posterity by a substack blogger.

Comments such as: “What grade would you give to a vaccine that people are vaccinated with three times and get sick twice (as of today)? Not to mention significant side effects” are quite sufficient to attract the scrutiny of relentless bots tracking down vaccine heresy whatever the scientific credentials of its authors.

As Dr. Shapira points out, Israel has the dubious distinction of being the most vaccinated nation in the world along with the highest rate of Covid cases. In an obvious reference to the not too distant past, Shapira said of the Twitter censorship: “Each day I understand better where we live and in which year.”

Highly qualified scientists are asking questions around the world. Dr. Kenji Yamamoto of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okamura Memorial Hospital, Japan has written to Virology Journal outlining the alarming connection between mRNA vaccination and reduced immunity.

Vinay Prasad MD MPH is a hematologist-oncologist and Associate Professor in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at the University of California San Francisco.

The VKPrasad lab at UCSF, studies cancer drugs, health policy, clinical trials and better decision making. He is the author of over 350 academic articles. This week he bemoaned the current frenzy of poor Covid science reporting by tweeting:

“How many science ‘communicators’ are just bad at science? I can’t think of another field where the communicator class is so far from the actual field in question.”

US Republican Congressman Thomas Massie offered:

“Last time I checked. @factcheckdotorg’s vaccine fact check program was funded by an organization (@RWJF) that holds $2 billion dollars worth of vaccine manufacturer stock.”

An Incestuous Web of Public Relations Hype

I can understand how vaccine manufacturers and biotechnology companies have used their billions to weave an incestuous web of public relations hype, biased fact checkers, financial sponsorship, and stock market power in order to promote and protect their products, but how did they manage to completely hood wink governments as well? Their well oiled machine has a big reach.

There is among politicians a lack of mathematical and scientific depth that leaves them vulnerable to both the myopic interpretations of low grade science funded by vested interests and the somnambulant acceptance of pharmaceutical drug guidelines among tired medical policy makers. How is the trick worked?

Take the strange case of Israeli Covid data vs Palestinian Covid data raised by Dr. Clare Craig former UK NHS diagnostic pathologist. Israel has an almost 100% vaccination rate (plus boosters), 4.6 million cases, 11,400 deaths, and a population of 9.2 million.

Palestine has a vaccination rate of 40%, 600,000 cases, 5,368 deaths, and a population of 4.8 million. Both countries are adjacent and their populations mix though cross border employment.

As we reported earlier this week, both countries have an almost identical Covid death rate per 100,000 population, which led us to correctly conclude that mRNA vaccines do not make any difference to severe Covid infection outcomes (that is as long as you chose to ignore the severe adverse events associated with mRNA vaccination, as most governments do).

How would you spin that if you were a vaccine proponent? Easy. Divide deaths by cases. This shows Israel has a 0.25% case mortality rate, but poor old Palestine has a 0.9% mortality rate. Hey Presto. Vaccine public relations problem solved: mislead the government and the public by telling them mRNA vaccination reduces the death rate and hence severity of Covid.

But deaths/cases is not ‘a scientifically meaningful’ way to interpret these figures. Simply put, highly vaccinated Israel has had tons more cases per head of population. So the data actually illustrates that mRNA vaccination is associated with a higher vulnerability to infection, but does nothing to reduce the death rate per 100,000 population.

In other words, vaccinated people are more vulnerable to infection (and repeated infection) and not protected from severe outcomes, just as Prof. Shapira, the former head of the Israeli vaccination research programme, has pointed out on Twitter.

Unvaccinated People Are Well Protected

In contrast, unvaccinated people are well protected for the longer term following initial infection. This is a real scientific fact backed up by careful large scale studies using mathematically appropriate analysis, as seen in the following articles:

• Is the Small Kingdom of Qatar About to Change Global Pandemic Policy?
• How the Nz Government Misleads Us Through Payments to Msm and Others

So this is one of the things that Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, our just resigned Director General of Health, was doing when he misleadingly said last week:

“…getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19. Very consistent with the international evidence.”

We should never forget that science is a process of data collection and analysis whose results are never so unequivocal as some politicians and health professionals would have us believe.

In this case, Dr. Bloomfield reduced a complex battery of information to a simple instruction aimed at the New Zealand public and our politicians: get boosted or face dire consequences. Yet even a high school science senior could detect and correct such a misuse of figures.

It is not hard to work out why he was still promoting mRNA vaccination right up to his retirement. Health systems around the world are locked into pharmaceutical orthodoxy. It has become not only routine to accept the safety assurances of drug companies, but heresy to question them.

it is a matter of life and death

What is at issue here is not an interesting discussion of the scientific method, it is a matter of life and death. A tragic drama that is being played out every day, while we are surrounded by paid opinion makers eager to guide us towards an uncaring sleep. We are sleepwalking to disaster to the tune of the march of the cash registers played by the massed bands of pharmaceutical profits.

As Dr. Shapira Tweeted on August 2nd:

“Myocarditis, fatal arrhythmias, 20% increase in strokes, facialis, Herpes Zoster, tinnitus (ear ringing), gynecological excessive bleeding, monkey-pox, obscured long term side effects. No worries. Be happy.”

This is the view from an acclaimed credentialled scientist in a highly vaccinated nation. New Zealand is also a highly vaccinated nation, but we don’t seem to have independent scientists concerned about scientific validity and public safety.

mRNA vaccination has caused a public health crisis whose extent is apparently being obscured by drug companies and a health elite working in tandem. Qualified scientists who ask questions concerning biotechnology safety are being cancelled, while tightly controlled media messages are urging populations to accept biotech revolutions in medicine and food.

Let me spell it out once again. We have a biotech vaccine that doesn’t reduce Covid infection, severe illness, or death. It causes serious (read: life changing) adverse effects at a rate at least 50 times higher than any previous vaccine.

In highly vaccinated populations, we have record rates of excess all cause mortality including among working age people, menstrual irregularities among 62% of women, depletion of sperm counts following vaccination, and reduced birth rates.

Pull the Other One; It Has Bells on It

The Hon. Andrew Little, Minister of Health, is telling us there is no crisis in our health service beyond a temporary shortage of staff and the need for more people to boost. Pull the other one, it has bells on it. We urgently need a government that is willing to admit dire mistakes, apologise, and correct them.

mRNA vaccination has given us a glimpse through a window into a dystopian biotech future. We need to wake up before it is too late and pause risky biotechnology experimentation. That includes pausing mRNA vaccination programmes now. The lives of our near and dear ones are at issue, the future health and longevity of the nation is at stake.

Excess all-cause mortality in New Zealand is running at record levels. About 100 people are dying each day in New Zealand (pop. 5 million).

A few times during the last couple of months, we have asked a key question: what are people dying of?

Ministry of Health data records that about 7 people are dying each day with Covid, but only about a maximum of 3 of these per day because of Covid. That is just 3% of deaths.

Occupancy of ICU beds with Covid hovers around 3-5%. Therefore it is not Covid that is overwhelming our hospitals, so what is?

The Ministry of Health and mainstream media have been talking vaguely
about a bad flu season, but a quick check of the FluTracking website reveals
that the 2022 flu season is not even as bad as 2019.

My plumber called in on a job last week and complained about staff falling ill continuously. Sick leave among teachers is up by 80%. The newspapers are also reporting kiwi businesses are closing because of staff shortages exacerbated by ‘winter illness’, but as the incidence flu is not that high what could be going on?

An in depth article in Stuff this morning contains an important hint:

Te Whatu Ora Taranaki hospital emergency department clinical nurse manager Therese Manning said, while there had not been much change to the number of presentations to ED in the last five years, the acuity of the patients is higher.

“This means we are seeing patients presenting with more severe illnesses and injuries…So there are more patients that need to be seen within 10 minutes of arriving….This demonstrates patients are more unwell and therefore likely to stay in hospital longer”.

Acute presentations at ED are increasing, but what are they ill with? We aren’t being told and may never be if our health czars are allowed to continue to deny access to information.

This week it has been widely reported (correctly) that six Canadian doctors died suddenly (at least three of them immediately after receiving their mandatory 4th shot), but hospitals refused to release the cause of death or vaccination status citing privacy concerns.

The authorities have vehemently denied that the deaths could be related to mRNA vaccination. See the summary of this article, 6 Canadian Medical Doctors Died Within 2 Weeks After 4th COVID Booster Shots for Employees Started at One Hospital.

I don’t know if you have noticed, but stories about sudden death incidents seem to have dropped off the MSM radar.

Three years ago a sudden unexplained death might have made the headlines, but today if they are reported at all, they only remain on the visible online page for a very short time. You might have missed this one.

Yet as the Taranaki Hospital ED data and the all cause mortality data reveal:

acute illness and sudden death are at an all time high. Life insurance data from the USA paints a similar picture.

So have our newspapers ceased to care or are they, like the hospitals and emergency services, too inundated to cope? Having heavily promoted mRNA vaccination for eighteen months, are they too embarrassed to ask questions?

Not Everyone is Keeping Silent

Professor Shmuel C. Shapira, long time Head of the Israeli Institute of Biological Research, has been speaking out about the failure of the Israeli mRNA Pfizer vaccination programme, describing it as a house of cards about to come tumbling down that will bury us all. He tweeted:

“I am not against vaccines, I am against stupidity, false science and management that is not professional and ignores matters-of-fact.”

Dr. Clare Craig, former UK NHS diagnostic pathologist, is also raising her voice. Speaking on GB news she analysed the official German Government data. This shows that 1 in every 5,000 doses causes a serious reaction to Covid vaccines, but it doesn’t stop there.

The German government is never one to shrink from data collection, so they also conducted a survey of more than half a million vaccine recipients and found that 1 in 500 reported a serious reaction after an mRNA dose (more than ten times the underreported official count).

If you are worried that lightly affected Germans are inflating the figures, stop worrying. The definition of a serious adverse reaction requires that a person be hospitalised or suffer a permanently life changing event.

Dr. Craig invited us to step back from the modelling and government guidance about efficacy and safety and consider that Covid data from around the world does not show that mRNA vaccination leads to any reduction in deaths. Most illustrative are comparisons between comparable countries with high and low vaccination rates.

For example Israel with close to 100% vaccinated (and most boosted with four doses) compared to Palestine with just 40% double vaccinated. Israel has 1,204 Covid related deaths per million population and Palestine 1,182 deaths per million population roughly the same. It becomes apparent that mRNA vaccination does not reduce the Covid death rate.

Just remember that analysis of Covid death data does not include rising all-cause deaths unrelated to Covid infection, the evidence points to reduced immunity as a result of mRNA vaccination.

Dr. Craig reported that the general public in the UK are voting with their feet and failing to come in for boosters (and they are stopping bringing in their children for this dangerous jab). Aren’t we all in sympathy? We are waiting for our doctors to speak up and our courts to do the math.

Photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash

The Long Read: Is mRNA vaccination affecting our psychology? If so, how and to what extent? What can we do about it?

The police and other ‘experts’ in New Zealand are complaining that digital ‘deep fake’ tools pose a threat to our justice system. A rendering of Jacinda Ardern with a modified hairstyle is used as an example.

Meanwhile, mathematician Igor Chudov, has reported that California has joined Germany, Hungary, Taiwan, UK, and Sweden in registering a large drop in the birth rate. Read his report here.

So we have the highest rate of excess all cause mortality in the world. Our hospital system is overwhelmed. Birth rates are dropping around the world. Suicide, mental illness and violent crime is rising precipitously. The global economy is floundering. But our police are worried that someone might use their computer to make a realistic cartoon of the prime minister doing something out of character. Am I missing something here?

Yesterday a dear friend who has been helping people in New Zealand injured by the Pfizer mRNA vaccine sent me a 476 page document containing thousands of short personal accounts of vaccine injury and death.

Am I surprised that the police, like those in Uvalde Texas, have initiated no action? Rather they are anxious to close a ‘loophole’ in the law that allows people to play with their computers, but look the other way if people die suddenly and unexpectedly in large numbers.

Has the Response to the Pandemic Changed the Way We Think?

The pandemic has highlighted huge gaps in our understanding of human consciousness. We have moved rapidly and far into an era of social polarisation, which is more representative of a prelude to social conflict than a health crisis. Curiously missing is a sense of human compassion.

In the animal kingdom biting and stinging without remorse is to be expected, but we did not expect ethical considerations to be cast aside in a similar brutal fashion in our human world.

There is no doubt that the refusal to countenance moral imperatives has become deep set and entrenched during the pandemic.

In the face of mounting evidence of harm, most governments, health professionals, vaccine proponents, and commercial interests have stuck to their guns and refused to take real world data seriously.

Respected scientists asking serious questions have been ignored and cancelled.

One of the hallmarks of the heights of human sensibility is the capacity to balance the individual and the social interest with compassion.

Heroes like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi led their long oppressed nations to freedom through years of forbearance and fortitude, which blossomed into forgiveness and understanding at the time of victory.

Our modern day leaders are rushing to cast aside hard won freedoms and rights in the service of blatantly commercial causes and overt prejudice. Nor do they shrink from promoting groundless fear and stress.

I am not alone in wondering whether Covid vaccines damage higher human functions. The capacity for moral reasoning, compassion, justice, inference, transcendence, and intuition, which mark out the high points of the human species, appears to be diminished at this time.

Anyone who is engaged in a dialogue with the authorities or publishing on the net will tell you that principles of rational thought and evidence are no longer the deciding arbiters of public truth. There is virtually nothing that qualifies as an open scientific debate taking place.

On a number of occasions pandemic commentator Steve Kirsh has offered huge financial incentives and bets, as much as $1 million, to set up publicly moderated debates, but there have been no takers.

The Structure of Human Consciousness

The origins of both human reasoning and compassion do not lie in a single gene or even a small collection of genes. They are supported by the collective functioning of the whole physiology. They find their counterpart in the balance or homeostasis of the physiology and in the operation of the immune system which protects the integrity of the physiology.

It is already well understood that drugs have both a physiological and a psychological impact, the alteration of the genetic and epigenetic basis of the physiology through genetic vaccines will not prove an exception to this rule, but will likely prove to have a more serious effect on mental disposition.

To begin to apprehend how our consciousness and physiology interact, it is necessary to investigate those traditions of knowledge which aim to understand personal consciousness. Among them is Yoga which is not a belief system, it comprises a set of practices which generate experiences sufficient to verify its philosophy.

Yoga along with many other cultural traditions expounds an underlying unity of life. It defines four forms of speech.

Everyday verbal speech and mental dialogue (or thinking) are the first two.

More subtle is the power of desire and the capacity to fulfill it.

The ultimate level of speech is referred to as ‘para’ which arises from a unity with nature in its broadest sense, something that the practice of Yoga seeks to awaken.

It amounts to our most private yet universal Self, an almost silent level of speech, a state of knowingness and pure potentiality. We will refer to this as the least excited or ground state of consciousness.

Some physical analogies might help to clarify how consciousness functions. Four levels of speech, may be said to be parallel to four states of matter: gas, liquid, solid and macroscopic quantum coherent states.

Everyday gossip is sometimes described as ‘hot air’, a gas.

Internal dialogue and monologue is more substantial and fluid like a liquid.

Our fundamental forces of desire and drive are even more substantial, persistent, and solid.

The ground state of consciousness can be likened to coherent states of matter analogous to those found in a super conductor. In coherent states of matter, individual atoms merge together in a quantum state of coordination and collectively gain access to seemingly impossible abilities like frictionless flow.

Consciousness is absolutely the fundamental of the human condition. It is also well established that consciousness plays a pivotal role in physical theory.

The evolution of quantum states is very instructive. Quantum states evolve as an abstract wave function—a superposition of all possible states in a virtual Hilbert space—until an intervention of consciousness, a measurement, takes place and the wave function collapses into a definite physical state.

In a sense, the ground state of consciousness operates as the quantum field of all possibilities. Poets have reported the most settled state of mind as a connection to the intelligence of nature.

Familiarity with that state of unity is said to give rise to the spontaneous expression of that which is useful in the moment. For example William Wordsworth wrote:

“….that blessed mood,

In which the burthen of the mystery,

In which the heavy and the weary weight

Of all this unintelligible world,

Is lightened:—that serene and blessed mood,

In which the affections gently lead us on,—

Until, the breath of this corporeal frame

And even the motion of our human blood

Almost suspended, we are laid asleep

In body, and become a living soul:

While with an eye made quiet by the power

Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,

We see into the life of things….”

Consciousness and Matter

Many physicists have suggested that the most unified level of physical reality is in fact consciousness itself, in its pure, universal, or unified state.

Many spiritual practices have measurable and repeatable effects particularly including meditations, which can have a normalising impact on a very broad range of physiological functions such as blood pressure, improved immune function, and reduced incidence of disease. In addition, there are measurable psychological effects.

I examine and reference a great many of these in my book Your DNA Diet. I was able to locate over 250 published studies of meditation which support positive effects on 45 key measures of ‘Quality of Life’ identified by health economists in the fields of physiology, psychology, and behaviour.

The psychological effects include reduced anxiety and stress, increased intelligence, field independence, optimisation of the brain, capacity for moral reasoning, improved concentration, emotional stability, improved memory, and reduced anger and depression.

My point here is that not just health, but also a balanced state of mind depends on a very balanced state of the WHOLE physiology. Damage or limit the inherent balanced, reflective, and flexible functioning of the physiology and the immune system, as mRNA vaccines apparently do, and potentially you are damaging your capacity to think clearly.

How Does the Ground State of Our Consciousness Guide Life?

The immune system has access to stored memories of past illness and pathogens, and a library of successful strategies. Many immune memories are inherited. But the invasion of novel pathogens and toxins (a process that modern living has accelerated) launches a systematic search for a fix.

The immune system has set patterns, but in its search for a cure, it also draws upon a highly creative process that must of necessity interface with all the time and distance scales of natural law including the least excited quantum level of life—a virtual superposition of all possible states.

Most successful immune responses are uniquely paired with the pathogen or toxin they are seeking to eliminate. Some, if not most, immune responses involve learning to live with the pathogen whilst simultaneously keeping it in check.

Thus the connection with the abstract quantum level of life, which is also the underlying universal field of consciousness, could be considered to be an essential element of the development of immune responses.

The parallels with our own experiences of consciousness should be apparent. We have characteristic patterns of speech, thought, and fundamental desires. Every so often we need to change gear to meet novel challenges and situations. We are hard wired via our physiology into the most settled state of consciousness—a creative field of all possibilities.

Our intellect, our memories, and our emotions are enriched through this connection which is a driving force of evolution for individuals and through them society at large.

The ground state of our existence is sometimes described as a rock, an anchor through the twists and turns of life. It is that quiet centre of life that we all sense as our substance, our Self.

Our intimate connection with the universal is what protects us and drives us forward. Saints such as Francis of Assisi are recorded as experiencing universal compassion for mankind and nature.

Our connection with and access to the universal level of consciousness depends on the orderly functioning of our whole physiology.

In What Sense Has the Pandemic Changed Our Psychology?

There is one characteristic of the psychology of those administering the pandemic, or one pointedly following the official advice, that is very obvious to the independent observer—reduced capacity to change direction, to change gear, to take account of situations outside the scope of previous usage.

Many commentators have discussed this. Some suggest that it may be the result of a deliberate plan to reset the world economy, others a result of mass formation—a sort of collective mind imposed by saturation propaganda.

There are reasons to support each of these ideas but also reasons to doubt they form the whole story. One problematic aspect of the psychological characteristics of the pandemic is their sudden onset. One week our Prime Minister was telling us she would never force anyone to vaccinate. Within days she enforced coercive vaccination mandates.

Clearly, whole populations are not all co-conspirators seeking to reset the global economy, nor do they appear to have a personal interest in doing so, yet they are mostly compliant.

Our suggestion is that this could be due at least in part to the effect of genetic vaccines which limit the normal flexible pathways of the immune system. This may loosen our connection with our inner Self, and lead us to rely instead on more inflexible conceptions and behaviours.

Are There Other Parallel Examples of Cognitive Impairment?

From a conventional physiological perspective, what could be going on? One possible model can be sought in Parkinson’s disease which is known to cause cognitive impairment in its later stages.

One cause is a drop in the level of dopamine, the neurotransmitter that is involved in regulating the body’s movements. Scientists investigating Parkinsons are looking at changes in two other chemical messengers — acetylcholine and norepinephrine — as possible additional causes of memory and executive function loss.

Areas most often affected include:

• Difficulty with complex tasks that require a person with Parkinsons to maintain or shift their attention
• Difficulties in generating, maintaining, shifting and blending different ideas and concepts.

The analogy with Parkinsons is only partially helpful. The cognitive impairment involved takes years to develop, whereas the reported cognitive effects of mRNA vaccination such as brain fog and inflexibility can appear immediately.

mRNA vaccination potentially interferes with the genetic command and control system that controls neurotransmitters. This could explain why specific neural pathways could be directly switched off and instantly affected by Covid vaccination.

The effect of mRNA vaccination on these pathways has not yet been the subject of any research. Thus we don’t know how long such effects, if they exist, will last or how many people they affect. Nor do we know how to reverse any psychological impairment.

Where Will This End?

This discussion has been speculative, pushing the boundaries of what we know and suspect.

It seems clear that trials of mRNA vaccines should have included assessments of cognitive effects and alterations in neural pathways, but then again, if established protocols had been followed, mRNA vaccine trials should have been abandoned when the first deaths subsequent to vaccination were recorded.

This didn’t happen. That in itself is a red flag indicating cognitive impairment.

We are in the middle of a global economic crisis during which corporations are making massive profits, at the expense of affordability.

Thereby they are pushing populations into poverty which will ultimately damage their own corporate affairs.

Health administrators cannot take rational account of real world health data if it contradicts their set ideas, even if it points to mass ill health.

Civilisations which lose their capacity to act rationally, inevitably fail. This is the challenge that the pandemic has thrown up—how do we correct the mistakes that are being made? We will have to dig deep to achieve that.

It is probable that the pathway out of the pandemic, aside from the cessation of risky biotechnology experimentation, should actually involve a process of rediscovering traditions of cultural knowledge and approaches to health which, in the headlong rush of modern living, we have carelessly forgotten or cast aside.

Thankfully this week the German Hospital Federation called for a cessation in the compulsory Covid vaccination programme for health staff because data shows it is endangering health.

New Zealanders received a text message offering them $100, a sausage sizzle, and a Mister Whippy ice cream if they came in for another shot. This is the kind of cognitive dissonance we are still facing.

The Platform: Rodney Hide speaks with Dr. Guy Hatchard on vaccines.

https://theplatform.kiwi/

https://www.facebook.com/theplatformnz/

Putting Medical Professionals in Charge of Pandemic Policy Has Been a Prescription for Both a Health Disaster and an Economic Catastrophe.

This week the public narrative changed dramatically. What are the lessons for our future?

The cat is out of the bag. MSM, governments, and health authorities have begun to acknowledge that Covid vaccines don’t work and cause serious health problems.

Worse still, pandemic policy is set to injure many more.

Even CDC director Rochelle Walensky has reportedly admitted ‘hope’ (yes hope) played an important role in their assessment of vaccine efficacy and, thereby, policy formation.

The German government warns that 1 in 5000 suffer serious side effects (just remember this is likely to be a gross underestimate which, in any case, omits long term effects).

The Israeli government has been caught hiding the extent of vaccine injury among children.

The Guardian newspaper, a bastion of vaccine orthodoxy, has conceded that prior infection not Covid vaccination offers the best protection against infection.

If you haven’t already seen it, watch Tucker Carlson on Fox News query the official US narrative, (and he references published science).

Fortunately for us, no one is going to be able to suppress this trend towards honesty, however hard they try, because it is increasingly difficult to ignore, hide, or spin Covid data from around the world.

The Austrian government, under pressure to explain what went wrong with their Covid policy, has apparently decided to blame doctors.

Are doctors at fault? Certainly the pandemic has taught us just how dangerous it is to hand control of public policy to medical professionals who receive a highly specialised but very narrow training.

Medical Professionals Have No Idea How Economic Systems Work.

A paper in SSRN journal concludes:

“It has become increasingly clear that an important negative side-effect of the most aggressive [pandemic] response strategies may involve a steep increase in poverty, hunger, and inequalities”

The New York Post summarises a range of data:

“The data shows lockdowns end more lives than they save”

CNN has offered:

“The pandemic has pushed nearly 100 million people into poverty. They’re struggling to escape”

The United Nations concludes:

“COVID-related hunger could kill more people than the virus…as the health crisis becomes an economic one, funding shortfalls and supply chain issues could see millions more die of hunger.”

The New Zealand government has spent more than $70 billion dollars on its pandemic response, more than half of an entire year’s revenue. This is borrowed money which will have to be repaid by our children. Most of this expenditure has been directed towards economically unproductive activity.

Economic systems involve networks composed of individual workers, creatives, growers, investors, assets, producers, distributors, retailers, and consumers spread across a very wide range of sectors.

Like climatic systems, economic systems are very complex and they are sensitive to marginal changes in their component parts which can drive unexpected outcomes.

From a limited and myopic medical perspective, sacking a highly qualified professional because they are unvaccinated may appear to make sense, but the economic consequences of even small losses in the nation’s skill base can be devastating.

Witness the near collapse of the New Zealand medical system. We lost a few thousand medical professionals to vaccine mandates. Has this played a part? Undoubtedly.

Was it necessary or helpful? No. We now know that unvaccinated individuals create a strong pool of natural immunity after initial infection which would have been a huge asset in our health system.

Medical Interference in Economic Policy Has Been a Disaster

Repeat mandates across the whole economic spectrum, toss in lockdowns and stay at home orders, and you have a prescription for economic chaos.

Discover that vaccines don’t actually work and even lower the immunity of the workforce, and you have entered a generational economic downturn.

Find that vaccines reduce the birth rate and increase all-cause mortality among working age people, and you have cancelled the stability of the world’s economic system altogether. That includes the world’s food supply system that is already under threat from climate change.

There are far more frightening potential consequences of the pandemic that are starting to come under scientific scrutiny. Immune deficiency resulting from Covid vaccination could well drive big surges in cancer incidence, the jury is still out.

Neurological and psychological deficits caused by invasive mRNA gene techniques remain unexplored. We are enrolled in a foolhardy gamble and the medical profession has mandated us to accept poor odds.

Of course, doctors and pharmaceutical systems are fighting back. The narrow economic imperatives of their sector—profits, high salaries, grants, drug and vaccine sales and incentives, all of which are associated with pandemic-focused government policy—are too tempting to give up, but given up they must be if we are to regain some prospect of economic stability.

The Medical System has Expanded Beyond the Limits of Safe Practice

This is not an exclusive product of the pandemic; it has a long history.

The WHO, medical and drug regulation, doctor training and practice, government support, medical orthodoxy and ‘ethics’ form a closely intertwined economic system that has over the years drifted away from any liability for mistakes and adverse outcomes.

This has been an assumption of power over life and death without consequences. The policing of the system has failed us. Medical misadventure became the third leading cause of death even before the pandemic.

Despite this, government policy is currently at the behest of medical czars. Covid was likely created by medical researchers, the dangerous and ultimately useless Covid vaccines certainly were.

Their combined effects are driving a steep downturn in longevity and with it economic productivity. Sadly the medical profession seems content to turn a blind eye to these outcomes in a show of contempt for human life and their hippocratic oath.

The standing of the medical profession has been eroded by their own disregard for science and ethics. The pandemic has been very much their own collective creation.

First among the subsequent mistakes has been a determination to use the pandemic as an opportunity to enforce their epidemiological orthodoxy on everyone irrespective of the introduction of risky novel biotechnology and irrespective of what the public data has been progressively revealing.

The belief that the sprawling self-interested medical system could or should dictate government policy to the exclusion of dissenting voices was a fatal mistake. We are now reaping the inevitable and devastating economic, social, and health outcomes. These are set to carry on for years.

Reform of medical systems and a reduction in their power is necessary.

• This must include the restoration of free medical choice, caution, and accountability.
• It must include a pause in risky biotech experiments.
• It must include a reassessment of the scientific criteria of medical efficacy.
• This must take account of quality of life outcomes and more stringent safety considerations.

The longer remedial action is postponed, the more social and economic pain will result.