Home Blog Page 31

God’s Own Country

0

One of my favourite books read whilst at Christchurch Teachers College was “Cry The Beloved Country” by Alan Paton. A 1948 novel about the trials and tribulations in pre-apartheid South Africa. It poignantly mourns the loss of the stability offered by traditional tribal ties as the economic and social alienation of blacks takes root in the cities.

hatchardreport.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com.

In 1980 New Zealand was still referred to as Godzone, a derivation of reforming Premier Richard Seddon’s turn of the century vision. ‘Godzone’ cherishes the ideal of a free caring society set in pristine nature. Whether this was ever fully true doesn’t really matter, it was something to aim for and be proud of. It celebrated our aspiration to be an inclusive, kind, and freedom-loving society.

The End of the Dream

Stuff Newspaper, famously sold for $1 in May 2020, is now generously funded by the New Zealand government to stuff us in their words full of “The Whole Truth”. Today Stuff published an article entitled “NZSO musician with anti-mandate ties seeking council seat”.

This is just another in a series of Stuff articles attacking anyone who opposed government Covid vaccine mandates, but for me it signals the end of the Godzone dream.

The assistant principal viola in the New Zealand Symphony Orchestra Nicholas Hancox is standing in the upcoming local body elections, but he is not welcome to do so. His crimes as detailed by the Arts Correspondent of Stuff are as follows:

  • An orchestra colleague accused Hancox of wearing a “Freedom-affiliated T-shirt” to a chamber music rehearsal.
  • Hancox sent an email to his NZSO colleagues in December in which he linked various articles from scientific journals which questioned the safety and effectiveness of mRNA vaccination.
  • Symphony orchestra publicist Tom Cardy described NZSO as ‘nonpolitical’ (??) but linked Mr Hancox’s criticism of mRNA vaccination to the government’s Covid-19 policies and said NZSO staff must refrain from “any act, omission, or statement that may detrimentally affect the goodwill or reputation” of the orchestra. Cardy also said “employees should not do anything that could compromise or be seen to compromise the NZSO’s ability to retain the Government’s confidence”.
  • Hancox made a submission to Parliament opposing the Covid-19 Public Health Response Amendment Bill. Stuff describes such actions as part of an effort to make New Zealand ‘ungovernable’.

So let’s examine these crimes one by one:

  • He wore a freedom T-shirt—apparently offending an unwritten and little-known NZ dress code disbarring references to freedom. Oxford Languages defines freedom as “the state of not being imprisoned or enslaved”.
  • He referenced mainstream scientific journals—he should have referenced the government alone or perhaps Stuff arts correspondents. This is perhaps the end of NZ science. Do you think this is an acceptable position or the start of fanaticism? Fanaticism is defined as “belief or behaviour involving uncritical zeal, excessive enthusiasm, blind faith, and the persecution of dissidents”.
  • He held political views different from the government—to retain employment at government-funded NZSO he should have been a musician devoid of political opinions. A restriction compatible with repressive regimes.
  • He responded to a government public consultation initiative—he should have kept his mouth shut and obeyed without question. Surely the government should stop this pretence of public consultation, responding will only get you into trouble.

Among the journal articles Mr. Hancox linked is this one: Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States an early article whose conclusions have been widely replicated and have since been acknowledged as accurate—the study’s main point being that mRNA vaccination does little to reduce Covid case incidence. Something that we are very well aware of in New Zealand as the vaccinated have filled our hospitals out of proportion to their numbers.

An article written in 1940 by Leo Fanning entitled “New Zealand… A Free Land. The Real God’s Own Country” said:

“No man who found himself suddenly endowed with infinite power could design and make a better country than New Zealand—happy isles of heart’s desire. Here nature offers mankind every gift for health of body and mind…Anyone with a good knowledge of the people here believes firmly that they will strive to their utmost to keep themselves free because they know well that they have a country worth keeping, a country worth guarding.”

I hope the significance of Hancox’s crimes are clear. We are no longer a free country nor a chosen people. We have somehow created an exclusive political class so sure of their right to rule us that the very word freedom sends shudders through their ranks and elicits calls to close the door to those who cherish the opportunity to learn and express themselves—they are no longer welcome here.

Is the Spike Protein Causative in Haemoglobin Disorders and Clotting?

0

What are the wider implications for personal health, pandemic policy and mitigation strategies?

For some time there have been anecdotal reports circulating concerning the appearance and formation of unusual rubbery blood clots which have been detected in Covid vaccinated individuals who have died.

Some embalmers, pathologists, and funeral home directors have noted extensive white proteinous fibrous structures blocking arteries, unique in their experience, which may have played a role in the etiology and pathology of fatal illness.

If you have been following the issue, you will have seen photographs and/or videos of these structures like this short video from a concerned British funeral home owner, or you might have heard senior US pathologist Dr Ryan Cole discuss the phenomenon.

This issue is contentious and the subject of sceptical comment from some quarters, but the record number of unexplained deaths, even among the young, and the relentless and reckless promotion of mRNA vaccines points to a need for closer investigation.

Dr Jessica Rose, a postdoc biochemist, who blogs on Substack and podcasts on Audible, has released a probing scientific analysis of the possible causes of this widely recognised clotting phenomenon under the title “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to haemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?. This article is both highly technical and partly speculative, but it is worth extracting some of the take home warnings and conclusions.

First of all note that this is the kind of precautionary post trial analysis that was omitted by Pfizer and others as they rushed mRNA vaccines to market. The reason behind 10 year approval cycles for previous vaccines is precisely because unexpected effects in the vaccine research field are the norm rather than the exception. The introduction of biotech jabs should have raised red flags about the short trial time frames, but it didn’t.

Dr Rose examines the possibility that the Covid mRNA vaccination causes haemolysis (rupture of red blood cells) releasing massive amounts of haemoglobin. And then asks: does the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, trigger misfolding of the haemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots and oxygen incapacity?

In other words, does the spike protein have prion-like properties that are causing chain clotting reactions (including microclots) which can cause death? Dr Rose thinks the answer to this question is a ‘YES’ and calls for more research to investigate the phenomenon.

Prions are pathogens that cause disease because of their misfolded shape rather than their biology. Misfolded proteins do not function like their correctly folded cousins and they are associated with neuro-degenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Prions can transform or ‘teach’ other proteins to misfold. It’s not really teaching as much as the disallowance of proper folding in adjacent proteins which then spreads further.

Disease-causing prions can resist proteolysis – the process which under normal conditions removes misfolded proteins. Protected from correction, prions can initiate an autocatalytic chain reaction which forms alien obstructive structures in the physiology. In Mad Cow Disease for example a prion chain reaction progressively replaces healthy structures in the brain.

Dr Rose outlines a plausible chain of events in the blood along with supporting evidence from VAERS data. According to Dr Rose, the reported incidence of porphyria, a rare disease normally caused by genetic defects, has increased in VAERS data by 17,265% when compared to years prior to the introduction of mRNA vaccination.

Porphyrins play a key role in the chain of reactions that produce haemoglobin. Porphyria is an accumulation of porphyrins in the liver or bone marrow due to defects in the porphyrin development pathway.

In addition to a wide range of severe physical and mental symptoms, porphyria can be associated with haemoglobin instability. Rupture of red blood cells is a necessary precondition for the release of unstable haemoglobin proteins susceptible to misfolding.

The increased incidence of porphyria raises another important safety issue which has consistently dogged the introduction of new drugs, vaccines, and even novel food ingredients. There is often an underlying assumption that chemical, physiological, biological, or genetic components perform single functions in isolation. This is invariably incorrect. Most have multiple roles. Altering one function, in the hope of correcting a single imbalance, can affect a whole range of other systems and outcomes.

Acute porphyria, in addition to physical symptomatology such as abdominal pain, has a psychiatric manifestations include hysteria, anxiety, depression, phobias, psychosis, organic disorders, agitation, delirium, and altered consciousness ranging from somnolence to coma. Some patients develop psychosis similar to schizophrenia. All of these effects come down to a dysfunction in physical red blood cell formation.

As we have discussed previously, psychological effects of genetic and epigenetic interventions including mRNA vaccines remains a largely unexplored field, but not one where safety can be assumed a priori. Yet that is precisely what has happened. Absence of evidence (since no one has looked for or measured effects) is not evidence of absence.

There is currently a lot of Covid hysteria, anxiety, agitation, and even phobia without much of a scientific or rational basis especially when you sit back and examine current Covid science publishing and data.

In summary, a whole range of naive safety assumptions have dogged the roll out of mRNA technology, and we have not yet adequately assessed the final outcomes of mRNA serious adverse effects.

Dr Rose raises a number of questions that require more investigation. Importantly, she urges extreme caution concluding:

Everyone needs to know why it’s essential not to introduce potential agents to disrupt the haemoglobin forming and clotting pathways [as the spike protein induced by mRNA vaccination does]. There are so many ways that things can go wrong. Which, is again, why I don’t understand why there are so many exceedingly arrogant humans who think it’s a good idea to mess with biology [using biotechnology].”

At the Hatchard Report we have already written about the persistence of the spike protein for months after mRNA vaccination and its capacity to accumulate in diverse organ systems. For this reason, it is clear that mRNA vaccine induced clotting can potentially affect all our organ systems in diverse areas of the physiology. The extent of this effect varies from individual to individual. There are currently inadequate procedures in the New Zealand health system to monitor such effects post vaccination or post mortem in order to investigate their extent more closely.

We started out by considering the causes of fibrous proteinous blood clots among the vaccinated, but by taking a wider angle of consideration we have realised that genetic interventions can threaten the holistic stability of life including even mental stability. Genetic structures connect mind and body.

All-cause mortality has surged to unprecedented levels around the world initiating the sharpest fall in longevity in 100 years. There is really only one sensible course of action—an energetic multidisciplinary approach to assess the range of adverse effects of human genetic intervention. The effort should be aimed squarely at pausing biotech and finding mitigating health strategies. This will require open minds. Successful mitigation will have to identify, include, and encourage proven dietary and lifestyle initiatives. Carrying on with present policies regardless is not an option.

Which only leads us back to our very own incautious blinkered government, health advisors, and administrators who this week ramped up the advertising budget yet again to encourage second boosters for everyone and a fifth shot for those with immune deficiencies; completely ignoring accumulating evidence that mRNA vaccination itself causes immune deficiency, while boosters are associated with increased all-cause mortality.

Our government has also launched a new advertising campaign praising the recent closure of District Health Boards and the introduction of centralised control of medicine. According to the advertising campaign, there are now more opportunities for contactless virtual medical consultations. In other words, you don’t need to meet a doctor in person, you can get your medical help directly from…who?? Hopefully it’s not the central government.

New Zealand—Safety not Guaranteed

0

The UK government recommends against offering the Pfizer Covid mRNA vaccine for pregnant women, those who might suspect that they could be pregnant, and anyone who is breastfeeding.

A carefully nuanced statement within a document entitled “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” (the latest revised version released on 16th August 2022) says:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.…Women of childbearing potential….are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time..”

The report concludes there never was any safety data for pregnant or lactating mothers and blames the rush to get everyone vaccinated for the lack of caution and incorrect safety advice previously offered by the government.

Here in distant New Zealand, which has been deliberately isolated from international information by our government, we are still being subjected to government advertising and MSM promotional articles advising that it is recommended for pregnant people (??) to take the experimental mRNA biotech shot including boosters.

In contrast to the UK government, pregnant mothers are advised that there are no safety issues or uncertainties.

Yet our all-cause mortality is running at 35% above the long term average.

Rising all cause Deaths are Related to Booster Uptake

The UK government has thereby provided an answer to just one question among the many that remain unanswered. Prominent substack writer Steve Kirsh lists 23 unanswered questions about the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines.

Over the last many months, Mr. Kirsh has offered large sums of money to any vaccine-advocating scientists who will debate these questions with him. There have been no takers.

Among the 23 questions, the prize goes to the gathering dark shadow of rising all cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries across the globe. Mathematician Igor Chudov has given mathematical and statistical validity to what is obvious if you look at graphs of all-cause mortality.

His linear regression of publicly available official death data from 29 countries, calculates an ironclad statistical relationship between booster rates and deaths (p= 0.0002 or 99.98% certainty). In other words, boosters and deaths go together like bread and butter. The statistical details are linked here.

The refusal to publicly debate safety despite mounting and overwhelming evidence of related deaths, marks vaccine advocates as aspiring members of a ruling elite who believe themselves above accountability, ethics, and human rights.

Curiously if any among their number changes sides and entertains counter safety data, they are cast aside. Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Mobeen Syed, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John Campbell, and many, many others started out their public commentaries strongly in favour of Covid vaccination. They are all vaccinated. Now they are all very publicly raising alarm bells about safety, but refer any vaccine advocate to their work (if you can) and these responsible doctors are rejected as unreliable (no reasons given).

How Have the Covid Ruling Elites Formed?

Ruling elites rely on enforcement of power structures and supremacy myths. They are often members of a single ethnic, professional or political group. They exclude and persecute those raising questioning or dissenting voices.

Such groups can attract narcissistic personalities and psychopaths (a serious personality disorder characterized by antisocial behavior, untruthfulness, irresponsibility, and lack of remorse or empathy) to join their ranks. Among ruling elites there is little room for debate or rationality.

The 4 C’s—careerism, conformism, coercion, and corruption are very busy around the world propping up the Covid vaccine safety narrative against evidence that has now become overwhelming.

In New Zealand, we are writing the book on suppression of information in order to save the reputation and protect the pockets of our ruling elites. To achieve this, the health of pregnant women and their unborn children, as well as the longevity of the population, including the very young, appear to have been judged expendable.

The Carefully Promoted Fantasy of Biotech Safety Dissolves in a Global Tsunami of Death, but It is Not Over

0

The use of CRISPR-Cas9 to edit genes was thrust into the spotlight ten years ago in 2012 when George Church, Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and Feng Zhang harnessed it as a tool to modify targeted regions of genomes.

A discovery that earned Doudna and Charpentier a Nobel prize. Given its potential to revolutionize gene editing, Science magazine named CRISPR Breakthrough of the Year in 2015.

Biotech PR went into high gear announcing that an era of precise, safe gene editing and biotech therapy had arrived, promising better crops and livestock, as well as the faultless cure of diseases and genetic defects.

By 2017, it had become apparent that problems were surfacing. Multiple scientists were raising red flags. A summary in New Scientist 18 July 2018 headlined “CRISPR gene editing is not quite as precise and as safe as thought”.

A study of CRISPR by Allan Bradley of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the UK and others found that in animal and human cell CRISPR experiments around a fifth of cells showed unexpected deletions or rearrangements more than 100 DNA letters long. These surprising changes are sometimes thousands of letters long.

Bradley noted some groups were developing treatments that would involve using genetic techniques to edit billions of cells inside the human body (sound familiar?). There’s a chance that a few of these cells might turn cancerous, he said:

“There’s a risk of causing cancer sometime in a patient’s lifetimeWe need to understand more before rushing into human clinical trials.”

paper published in Cell in 2020 examining CRISPR’s possible use on human embryos found that in more than half of the cases, the editing caused unintended changes, such as loss of an entire chromosome or big chunks of it—sufficient to cause life ending medical conditions.

The general conclusion was that editing of genetic and epigenetic systems carries risks of unintended consequences, and that genetic mobility and rearrangement of genetic sequences is a common outcome. Great caution was advised

Come the pandemic panic of January 2020 and the consequent loosening of the already inadequate safety protocols surrounding genetic experimentation. There followed the warp speed approval of barely tested mRNA vaccines. Then there was the pressure on governments:

Giving evidence to Parliament in May 2021, Dominic Cummings, chief advisor to Boris Johnson, said:

‘The conventional wisdom was that we were not going to be able to have any vaccines in 2020. In March, I started getting calls from various people saying, “These new MRNA vaccines could well smash the conventional wisdom, and don’t necessarily stick to it.” People like Bill Gates and that kind of network were saying that.’

There was no mention of mainstream scientific caution about biotech safety. The potential profits were mouth-watering. The introduction of gene therapy-based vaccines to billions of people, without any necessity to warn them of the well known risks, was all set to roll.

18 months on the situation has become apocalyptic:

  • All cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries worldwide are rising far in excess of pre-pandemic levels.
  • VAERS data shows that cancer incidence is rocketing.
  • ‘Unknown cause of death’ has become the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada.
  • In other places, doctors are just guessing at causes of sudden death on death certificates.
  • Insurance claims among working age people are rising steeply.
  • Funeral homes are working at 30% or more above pre-pandemic levels.
  • In the rare cases where autopsies are performed, also noticed by embalmers, strange white proteinous self-assembling masses in arteries are implicated in blood clot formation.
  • Athletic youngsters and aging champions alike are falling ill and dying

You might think that there would be pause for thought, but you would be wrong. Government authorities are so far down the track, that it is proving difficult if not impossible to turn around. Instead they are doubling down.

  • In Queensland teachers who didn’t vaccinate are facing compulsory pay cuts.
  • An Australian journalist asking questions about pandemic policy was refused entry to New Zealand due to his “character.”
  • Two New Zealand journalists had their house raided, computers seized and were arrested for suggesting that some vaccine proponents might have committed criminal offences.
  • Ten police turned up at a doorstep to arrest a lady who attended the peaceful parliament protest 6 months ago (ten police to one woman?).
  • Pro-vaccine funded scientists are busy misrepresenting Covid data to reassure the public that there is nothing out of the ordinary and recommending more coercive vaccine and mask mandates.
  • In the UK and other highly vaccinated countries bivalent mRNA vaccines have been approved in the absence of safety data.
  • In Canada the courts have ruled that it is not unconstitutional to deny access to life saving health services to the unvaccinated.

Just reflect for a moment that the predatory commercial arm of the biotech industry has achieved a sought after goal:

  • Risky experiments on human populations have been normalised,
  • Generously funded by governments,
  • Granted indemnity from prosecution,
  • Supported by trusted media outlets.
  • Acceptable rates of adverse effects have been raised by 5000%
  • Doctors, medical professionals, and administrators have been generously paid or coerced into compliance.
  • The public has been thoroughly indoctrinated by a paid propaganda blitz.
  • Probing questions are cancelled by social media.

It is open season for biotech shots and no one involved in the gravy train is going to give that up without a fight. Dozens of new biotech vaccines are in the development pipeline, all hoping to cash in on the tsunami of death.

The battle lines have been drawn. On the one side vested interests with deep pockets, the modern medical establishment, and governments seeking ultimate control over personal choice, are urging on the majority of highly vaccinated people whose health is deteriorating rapidly but whose belief in final vaccine victory remains undimmed.

On the other hand, small bands of cautious unvaccinated individuals, rational scientists, and alternative media have their health, but are facing unprecedented criticism and cancellation. They have been labelled violent fascists determined to undermine democracy.

No one recalls or references the well known severe risks of biotech interventions which are detailed in multiple reputable journals pre-pandemic.

No one in authority will reference any current publishing that raises red flags. Instead they are blindly intent on making everyone comply with Covid vaccination policies and presumably in the near future with more novel biotech vaccines covering a wide range of illnesses.

For centuries it has been held that free will is what distinguishes us from animals, take that away and what are we left with?

How A Small Scientific Elite Dictates Government Policy

0

Fact Check: Are Excess Deaths in New Zealand the world’s highest or lowest?

The University of Otago publishes a blog called Public Health Expert. The 24th August edition was entitled “The Covid-19 experience in Aotearoa New Zealand and other comparable high-income jurisdictions and implications for managing the next pandemic phase“.

The authors were Dr. Jennifer Summers, Prof Nick Wilson, Dr. Lucy Telfar Barnard, Dr. Julie Bennett, Dr. Amanda Kvalsvig, and Prof Michael Baker, who all work at the Otago University Department of Public Health.

This blog has been picked up uncritically by newspapers across New Zealand. For example the Otago Daily Times claims that:

A new analysishas shown how New Zealand’s pandemic response left it with one of the lowest rates of excess mortality in the world sparing it the thousands of extra deaths seen even in elimination countries like Taiwan and Australia.”

The blog uses data from Our World in Data, a US website, in order to compare New Zealand data with Taiwan, Singapore, Japan, Australia, and South Korea. Based on their analysis, the blog authors advise extending New Zealand pandemic policy, including vaccine enforcement, mask wearing, home isolation, and vaccines for the under fives.

The blog prints a graph (below) apparently showing that New Zealand has the lowest rate of excess all-cause deaths among the six countries for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 (the small print notes that the graph might not count all deaths due to incomplete coverage and delays in reporting).

The graph appears to show that all cause deaths in New Zealand have remained well below pre-pandemic levels throughout the three years covered by the pandemic. The Y axis is labeled ‘number of deaths per million relative to previous years’. The graph does not state whether this is a weekly total or a cumulative total or something else.

A naive reading of the graph, which was presumably the approach of the various poorly qualified science explainers in MSM, appears to show that excess deaths per million are currently at a rate of 200 deaths below previous levels (per week, per year, per three years??? the blog doesn’t tell you), but you would be completely wrong to read the graph like this.

If you go vertically up from the date 1 July 2022 to the graph and then across to the Y access, as we are trained to do in school, you reach a figure—minus 250. If you think that means in the week ending 1st of July all-cause deaths were 250 below the long term average, you are being misled. The all-cause death rate for the most recent week of August is actually 246 ABOVE the long term average.

Close inspection shows that the graph is a measure of the accumulating excess death rate for the entire pandemic, not the current death rate. In other words, the early death data before Covid infection and vaccines is averaged with present data, which appears to lower the current death rate.

The success claimed for New Zealand by the blog and the low death rate reported by MSM is actually due to the extreme lockdown measures of 2020 and the consequent zero flu rate. Since then, matters have consistently deteriorated, and now deaths are accelerating to unprecedented high levels.

In 2020 there were virtually no Covid infections and no vaccines. The closure of borders and lockdowns ensured there was no flu season. All-cause deaths were very low. For most of 2021, lockdowns continued, and Covid cases were very low, and vaccines were rolled out. Deaths rose and peaked parallel to the vaccine uptake. In 2022 all-cause deaths have risen dramatically. Deaths because of Covid form a very small percentage of the all-cause deaths.

NZ All Cause Deaths Highest in the World

Official New Zealand Ministry of Health figures from last week show that all cause deaths were 946 for the week. This is a record for New Zealand.

The pre-pandemic average number of deaths per week was 663. Taking into account seasonal fluctuations (winter deaths are higher) the current excess number of weekly all cause deaths is 35% above the long term average. A very worrying figure indeed. Among the highest in the world, not the lowest.

The correct interpretation of the 2022 figures in the graph is as follows:

All six countries which have followed vaccination policies very similar to New Zealand now have rapidly rising all-cause death rates.

Are you impressed or are you disappointed with the rather deceptive approach being taken by Otago scientists? If you are concerned you are not alone, in fact you are in august company. Rishi Sunak, until recently UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, currently in the last weeks of his bid for the Tory leadership, has given an interview with Spectator magazine entitled:

The lockdown files: Rishi Sunak on what we weren’t told

These are some of his conclusions he reached from inside the UK government decision-making process:

When the evidence started to roll in, a strange silence grew in government: dissenting voices were filtered out and a see-no-evil policy was applied.”

A cost-benefit calculation a basic requirement for pretty much every public health intervention was never made…. The script was not to ever acknowledge side effects [of policies]”.

One of Sunak’s big concerns was about the fear messaging, which his Treasury team worried could have long-lasting effects.

In every brief, we tried to say: let’s stop the “fear” narrative. It was always wrong from the beginning. I constantly said it was wrong.”

The UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson wanted to present it as following the science rather than a political decision, and this had implications for the wiring of government decision-making. It meant elevating Sage, a sprawling group of scientific advisers, into a committee that had the power to decide whether the country would lock down or not, but it was a forum where questions could not be asked. Sunak said:

This is the problem, if you empower all these independent people [advisors], youre screwed.”

Sunak said that questions and concerns raised by some Sage scientists during their private meetings were withheld from government. As a result, according to Sunak, government pandemic policies, especially lockdowns, created an economic disaster.

This week’s Public Health blog from the University of Otago is a prime example of what Rishi Sunak has revealed. The blog is aimed directly at informing future government policy. It says:

Based on a comparison of responses we provide updated recommendations for the NZ Government around strengthening existing public health measures to reduce the immediate and long-term impacts from Covid-19.”

In fact, the information provided by the Otago Department of Public Health scientists to the government in this blog is lacking key explanatory information and apparently biased in favour of particular policy decisions. It suggests that prior New Zealand policy has been the best in the world and should be extended.

Their recommendations include:

  • Extending current government messaging encouraging boosters
  • Strengthening measures in schools.
  • mRNA vaccines for the under fives.
  • Deploying new biotech vaccine types.
  • Stronger measures to ensure vaccine acceptance.
  • Mandates to enforce mask wearing.
  • Longer periods of home isolation

The sole reference in the blog to the rapidly accelerating all-time record levels of all-cause mortality in New Zealand is this phrase:

“…the direction of the curve suggests that the reduction is decreasing in magnitude.”

Do you think that is sufficient information for politicians to make informed policy decisions? We don’t. As Benjamin Franklin said many years ago:

There’s none deceived but he that trusts”.

As I wrote to Prime Minister Ardern last week, we are not recording the vaccination status of people on death certificates. As a result, we don’t know what is causing the excess deaths in New Zealand.

In the UK, such figures are kept and they show that excess deaths are disproportionately affecting the vaccinated, especially the boosted. Data from other countries indicates the causes might include high cancer rates, blood clots, and cardiovascular illness.

Crucially, deaths rates are unusually affecting working age people and the young. Have our experts informed our government? Apparently not.

As Rishi Sunak advises:

“Find out what you are not being told”.

The Tide May Be Beginning to Turn, But Most Are Pressing on Regardless

0

The publication and analysis of damning official data from the UK, Israel, and all points of the compass (see here and here) has established that Covid vaccination is driving adverse effects and all-cause deaths on an unprecedented scale.

Suddenly a few officials are offering apologies. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Director of the US CDC, told us last week that they had got their pandemic response wrong.

The adverse effects and death data is so definitive that lawyers are warning officials to change tack or face prosecution. A law firm in Australia has warned AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Authority) that they were breaking the law when they forbade doctors and other health professionals from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables.

Even Google owned YouTube is quietly changing its censorship policy. You are now allowed to post a video asserting that masks don’t work, previously your work would have been deleted. However, a school in mask-loving California called the police when a four year old took off his mask and refused to put it back on. He was taken home by the police and excluded from school for a week.

In the UK, the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation) advised the government to approve the new bivalent Moderna mRNA Covid vaccine. What were they thinking? They did so without adequate safety data, apparently on the basis that we have done it once and got away with it, so why not have another go? View a list of guilty JCVI members here.

An article in the Washington Post entitled “Your first brush with coronavirus could affect how a booster works” reprinted in Stuff illustrates just how far scientists are willing to go in order to retain their options to experiment on the general population.

The nuanced discussion claims that mRNA vaccines were initially spectacularly successful (???), but concedes that they no longer work because of immune system imprinting (aka original antigenic sin), and even goes as far as admitting they almost certainly won’t work in future.

Even so, it quotes scientists urging the development and use of revamped mRNA technology including bivalent vaccines, nasal vaccines, vaccines at birth, and vaccines tailored to individuals (none of which according to the article are likely to work very well, if at all).

Crucially the article makes no mention of adverse effects of RNA vaccination or rising excess all-cause deaths, instead scientists argue that the pandemic response has not worked but has been overall “a good thing”—an oxymoron. They must be really worried about the longevity of their research grants, but not so worried about the longevity of the world’s population.

The most memorable quote from the article is in the last sentence: Christian Gaebler, an assistant professor of clinical investigation at the Rockefeller University says:

“If someone says they fully understood this, they would be lying.”

Here in little New Zealand the penny has not yet dropped among the general public. Why would it? Over 90% of the population are Pfizer vaccinated and the unvaccinated have been publicly designated (by all political parties, the government, MSM, and academia) as terrorists determined to make the country ungovernable. Any public u-turn would be immensely embarrassing.

New Zealand has become party-central for government overreach. Herd-immunity, adverse effects of mRNA vaccination, and lab-leak theories have all been officially labelled by a government funded research institution as baseless conspiracy theories. MSM have elevated the charge to treason.

All three of these concepts are the subject of copious academic publishing and debate. Excluding them from public discussion or labelling them as false amounts to an attempt to subvert the scientific process. A couple of days ago Brett Sutton, Chief Medical Officer of the Australian state of Victoria, tweeted that the lab leak theory was proven false beyond doubt. He doesn’t appear to be following science publishing.

See for example this analysis which argues that recently published studies advocating a zoonotic origin of Covid-19 suffered from ascertainment bias. In other words, their case sampling concentrated around the Wuhan Seafood Market because scientists assumed from the outset that it must have begun there. As a result they omitted to cast a wider sampling net which might have disproved the theory. Statistically equivalent to asking only train drivers if they liked railways, then concluding that all people like railways.

From this point, any politician, media outlet, or health professional who continues to claim the universal safety and effectiveness of Covid vaccination and its applicability for the young has either neglected to inform themselves or they are being willfully misleading.

Anyone who casually blames climate change, holiday heart syndrome, or a host of other excuses for the rising rate of all cause deaths is not only barking up the wrong tree, but they are also confusing the public and obstructing the course of justice.

I am surprised New Zealand media reprinted the Washington Post article, it doesn’t fit with their prior publishing, but then again maybe the tide is beginning to turn even here. We are still waiting for a public discussion offering honest and complete information about risks in a form that can be readily understood.

Formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

The Biotech Tipping Point

0

We have been wondering where all this is going. As time goes by, some longer-term outcomes are becoming apparent.

Excess all-cause mortality is rising around the world, especially in countries with high vaccination rates like New Zealand, Australia, and Portugal.

What are the implications for the world and the potential pathways ahead?

Curiously, resolutions, good or bad, might not be a matter of political decisions or scientific research, but largely a matter of rapidly worsening health outcomes. If all cause mortality continues to rise, there will be a tipping point beyond which what is currently considered normal will no longer be viable.

Our Situation Here in Highly Vaccinated New Zealand Allows us to Examine Possible Scenarios.

As reported previously, Kiwis are seven times sicker than before the pandemic. Businesses are struggling to find workers, some have closed their doors forever. The hospitality industry is reportedly on its knees all over the country.

School attendance has fallen. More than half of the country’s school students failed to attend class regularly in the first term of the year, a record. North of Auckland for example only 34% of students are regularly entering the classroom, compared with 64.4% in 2019 – the year before the pandemic hit.

survey of more than 900 doctors has revealed that our health workforce is at risk of ‘catastrophic collapse’. Their letter to Jacinda Ardern reports: 

“So many [doctors and nurses] are off sick that we have to close areas of the department or work there on our own with no nursing support…” 

4,000 people have been waiting for more than a year to see a specialist.

The Government and the Health Service are in Denial

Andrew Little, Minister of Health, responded to the doctors in July 

“I’m satisfied that we have the means to get on top of the issues.”

Since then, the winter Covid wave has subsided, but the health crisis has not gone away, it has got worse as all-cause mortality climbs steadily past previous records. Last week recorded all-cause deaths were 946, 35% above the long term average and trending up.

At what point will people ask why are they constantly falling sick and why are they finding that others are in the same boat? Few people are aware of the rising death rate because the government is not analysing the figures and mainstream media is not asking questions, but it can’t remain hidden forever and in any case its influence will be felt whether we realise the cause or not.

As we reported last week, UK ONS figures show that the health crisis is predominantly affecting the vaccinated. If the unvaccinated are excluded from the workforce through mandates, we are shooting ourselves in the foot. Their long term health is the least affected by the pandemic.

Tipped Over the Edge by Biotechnology

A global Covid inoculation scheme has drawn billions of people into what is essentially a biotechnology experiment whose outcome was unknown.

The resulting health crisis has no precedents—it involves genetic manipulation of the immune system function. Is it reversible? No one really knows. We have entered uncharted territory.

The immune system makes quintillions of decisions and effects repairs in our physiology everyday. More than 70,000 daily repairs in each cell for example, and we each have 37 trillion cells. From the outset, believing that immune system function could be fundamentally altered without compromising our health was a pipe dream.

The Extent of Long Term Outcomes is Almost Unimaginable

Increased rates of all cause mortality and greater numbers of sick people imply that longevity is being reduced. This implies fewer people in the workforce.

More sick people means that a larger number of people are involved in looking after them, which reduces overall productivity and economic output.

The nature of increased illness is important. Cancers, heart disease, and neurological illness all have larger longer term effects and require more carers.

Even small changes in the balance of social indicators, especially health outcomes, can have huge effects on macroeconomic conditions. Currently, changes are accelerating and snowballing. Citi Bank predicts that UK inflation will hit 18% next year. it would be a mistake to assume this is solely due to energy pricing.

For almost three years there has been a large measure of Covid pandemic uncertainty, fear, and stress networking itself throughout society and the world. It is driving irrationality, panic buying, price gouging, profiteering, and misdirected anger.

Can Politicians, Medical Professionals, and Our Press Change Gear?

They are not doing very well at present.

We still don’t know the full extent or duration of the problems associated with mRNA vaccination. Does it cause cognitive decline or is it increasing cancer rates in the general population? If so, by how much? There is a growing realization that health authorities and governments have pushed these questions aside.

In some cases, data has been deliberately withheld or manipulated. See for example this video from GB News (watch from 27 minutes to 40 minutes) which contains footage of a zoom meeting between Israeli Ministry of Health officials and researchers in early June about an official investigation verifying serious adverse effects whose concerning conclusions have remained hidden from the highly vaccinated general public.

The findings in Israel verified a causal connection to mRNA vaccination. The adverse effects got stronger after each successive vaccination. Long lasting neurological effects for example were found to be related. Serious menstrual irregularities can persist for over a year.

Despite warnings from the scientists involved in the investigation that the current Israeli government public safety narrative was highly misleading, key findings were omitted from the final report. In fact, incomplete and unrepresentative data was released by the Ministry of Health with the apparent intention of making the adverse effects appear rare or short lived. Minimisation that appears to have happened in a number of countries.

The search for curative health strategies for those affected adversely by both Covid infection and vaccination will have to involve a multidisciplinary approach that must range outside the comfort zone of modern medicine.

Lifestyle Factors are Known to Positively Affect Covid Infection Outcomes

We have already discussed published research studies showing vegetarian diets, regular exercise, some traditional herbs, and sufficient rest all significantly reduce Covid hospitalisation rates by up to 70%. Will they also alleviate the immune deficiency associated with Covid vaccination? We don’t know, but we have to find out. It’s urgent.

DNA sits at the interface between consciousness and matter. Researchers have found that meditation can influence genetic expression. Gene expression is the process which enables the DNA to produce functional proteins. A 2016 study by award-winning cancer researcher Dr. John Fagan, a former colleague of mine, presented at a Belgrade conference, reported improvements in long term meditators:

  • Reduced expression of genes involved in the Stress Response
  • Reduced expression of genes linked to Inflammation—which could be of importance in reducing incidence and/or severity of Covid, heart disease, arthritis, and atherosclerosis.
  • 19 genes linked to Cardiovascular Disease were altered in their regulation
  • Tumour-Suppressor Genes were up-regulated

Is there reason here to hope that deep meditation could help correct the immune deficiency associated with Covid mRNA vaccination? Possibly.

Will more people adopt such lifestyle changes in their search for better health? It is hard to say how long people will cling to their faith in biotech shots before the truth sinks in that they are only making matters worse.

What Could Happen?

Doing nothing is not an option. In addition to rising all cause mortality, we are facing regional conflict, supply chain issues, food shortages, and global recession. A catastrophic fall in human immunity could be enough to push the world past a point of no return.

The collapse of essential services, including emergency healthcare, education, and workforce stability are not out of the realm of possibility, as we are seeing in New Zealand.

If central government fails to take a lead in charting sensible rational responses, local non-governmental initiatives, contacts, and informal safety nets could become increasingly important. Expect to see local area groups organising alternative health initiatives and food coops and banks out of necessity. Hopefully before it is too late.

Misguided attempts to mandate more biotech health measures will only intensify problems. Why is the UK government funding the new bi-variant Moderna mRNA shot without any adequate basis in scientific assessment?

On the other hand, if rational discussion becomes possible, increased cooperation in the face of challenges could lead to the cessation of any further risky biotech experimentation which is at the root of the current health crisis. It could also allow currently unforeseen solutions to germinate.

If current pandemic policies are continued regardless and genetic medicine continues to be used in defiance of obvious and ballooning safety issues, the tipping point will be passed. The potential outcomes are at best uncertain. If we continue to place our faith in discredited notions, what we remember as normality may no longer be available.

The Health of Millions Has Been Affected by a Simple Scam

0

How biotech and pharmaceutical companies with the help of the Ministry of Health modelled their Covid sales strategy on investment scams.

Last week a college student (with a rich uncle) made $110 million by investing in struggling US retailer Bed Bath and Beyond. BBB’s shares were at a rock bottom $5.50, but the ‘savvy’ student invested $25 million in July which sparked market interest. The share price surged to $27, and then last Tuesday the student sold his stock for $130 million. BBB shares plummeted back down.

This phenomenon, known as meme-investing, relies on small investors tracking big investors and then making identical but small scale stock purchases themselves which drives the price up even further. Their aim is to make money on the coattails of the rich by guessing when to sell out in time. Inevitably, all but a lucky few small investors lose their stake. The wealthy investor, who initiates the scheme and chooses his time to sell, makes a massive profit.

You can see that this sort of investment strategy does not rely on any real information about the underlying strength or weakness of the company being targeted. It simply relies on the initial large stock purchase, the willingness of some small investors to join in the speculation, and then the gullibility of a great many others who believe the initial large upward stock movements point to a real value for the company. They are the ones who eventually lose out.

Cut Back to the Pandemic

Pfizer, Moderna and others announced that their vaccines were highly effective. Figures around 95% were quoted. Consequently the general public believed that the mRNA technology really worked and saved lives. There was instant mass acceptance, governments bought the vaccines thinking they were investing in public health, and also granted indemnity to big pharma.

Just as was the case with mom and pop investors buying rising stocks, there was no indication that there were any risks for the end user.

The eventual pharmaceutical company profits were massive.

The general public thought that a 95% figure meant that 95 out of every 100 people would be protected from infection (apparently very favourable odds). What Pfizer and others didn’t say was that 95% was actually a relative reduction in risk. The absolute reduction in risk of infection measured in the vaccine trials was 0.86%, meaning that only 1 out of every 119 people would be able to avoid infection specifically as a result of the vaccine. Pfizer hid this information. View this link here to watch a UK consultant cardiologist on prime time television explaining the sleight of hand involved.

Crucially Pfizer also hid the fact that the trials did not show that the vaccine would reduce the risk of hospitalisation or death, but instead caused serious adverse effects.

The stage was set for a massive misunderstanding and a catastrophic tragedy. Something that is only coming to light as the casualties and the infection rates reach successive peaks irrespective of high vaccination rates.

There never was an underlying value to the technology, and the risks were huge. There are now record levels of all cause mortality and it is not related to Covid infection. Draw your own conclusions.

No worries for Pfizer, Moderna, and their pals though, the profit is already in the bank. It is more than enough to cover any lawsuits if they ever do get to a court.

What is the Outcome?

Last week Newshub ran a piece drawing on multiple sources reporting that Kiwis are currently seven times sicker than before the pandemic. The incidence of seasonal flu, gastro bugs, respiratory illness, cough, fever, runny nose, conjunctivitis, sore throats, even foot and mouth disease are all at record levels. The piece reports that it is not due to Covid, Covid cases are currently at their lowest level since February.

Even more concerning, excess all-cause deaths are at all-time record highs and rising.

Vaccinologist and government advisor Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris said on the Newshub piece “our immunity against a whole lot of things is a little [???] bit down because we haven’t been constantly, I feel like, primed all the time. We’ve got lots and lots of different viruses coming over [from where??].” The answer according to Dr. Petousis-Harris is to “stay at home, mask-up, and keep your distance from others”. Sound familiar?

Are you, like me, a little puzzled by what Dr Petousis-Harris said? She feels like we haven’t been constantly primed?? Is that sufficient to explain a seven times increased incidence of viral illness and record levels of all cause mortality, or is it even scientific? I don’t think so.

In fact if you look at the UK ONS figures, as we have done in our last two Hatchard Report releases, it is apparent that high all cause mortality has affected the vaccinated but not the unvaccinated.

It is only a short step to realise, correctly, that the immunity of the vaccinated has declined sharply. The truth appears to be—the vaccinated have been primed to be constantly sick.

Who is to Blame?

Our government is keeping quiet and its experts are offering rather vague excuses and encouraging us to continue to follow everything that Pfizer recommends.

Open any media page and the chances are the government will be offering you advice. Today, on opening the New Zealand Herald front page, the government was advertising these encouragements to have another booster.

“The second booster will:

  • Make you less likely to go to hospital
  • Give you greater immunity against Covid-19, including Omicron
  • Boost your immune response back to previous levels”

We have the world’s highest Covid vaccination rates, our hospitals are overwhelmed, our Omicron case rates have been the highest in the world, and we are seven times more likely to fall sick. So do you believe the government? Or do you think that another booster might be a risky investment?

Clearly those who kept secret key aspects of the Covid vaccine trial data are culpable. But why, as the full data is gradually being released by court order, is our government still following Pfizer’s lead?

The wheels of justice are slow to turn. It is often remarked that not enough people speak up publicly. If you see something, say something.

What Are the Lessons Here?

The Christchurch earthquake a few years back was a salutary reminder to take care of our foundations. If the foundations are cracked or resting on unstable ground your home is at risk. If you neglect the foundations of life, your life might get shaken.

DNA is the physical foundation of life. Altering it, or altering the way it works, as mRNA vaccines do, is so dangerous that it puts the whole structure of life at risk. It was a foolhardy enterprise from the start, one from which those who invested their faith were bound to lose out.

Biotechnology experimentation has to be controlled now if we are ever to exit the pandemic era.

There are also psychological lessons to be learned. For two years the whole world has been marooned in a state of fight or flight, unable to calm down because the fear-based information that is being made available to them is misleading and often false. Availability of truth is the psychological counterpart of physical genetic stability. Take that away and life rapidly loses its anchor.

Truth has become an unstable commodity, like the stock market, easily manipulated without reference to its real underlying value.

Every culture and religion in the world espouses a philosophy of right and wrong. Doing the right thing, being honest and truthful, are foundational principles of life.

If we allow ourselves to be governed solely by self interest irrespective of social interest and morality, we have missed the point of life. Inevitably society will begin to disintegrate. If we blindly follow others based on authority or hope, we can easily be misled and then disappointed or worse.

Covid mRNA vaccination has turned out to be a health market manipulation on a global scale. The health of millions has been affected or put at risk by a simple scam, and we still don’t know the extent of the final outcome. The real valuable currencies of life are truth and genetic stability. Both have to be recaptured and protected. That is our task.

OPEN LETTER to Hon. Jacinda Ardern—Current Pandemic Policy and Protocols Are Out of Date

0

Cc Andrew Little Minister of Health, Leaders of all political parties represented in parliament.

I am writing to request the implementation of key elements of pandemic reporting and policy that are currently absent from Ministry of Health procedures.

Death certificates do not require Covid vax status to be recorded.

In the UK this information is required and the UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) has recently released this data for all people dying from all causes since the start of the Covid vaccination programme in January 2021 as follows:

As you can see, vaccinated people have a relatively elevated rate of dying from any cause when compared to unvaccinated people. In summary, currently the unvaccinated make up 25% of the UK population yet have only a 4% mortality rate per hundred thousand person-years. The boosted compose 50% of the population but have a 86% mortality rate per hundred thousand person-years. ONS figures which separate Covid deaths from non-Covid deaths show that this breakdown is consistent.

To give you an idea of what the use of person-years means in practical terms, if the UK data pattern is being replicated here it is resulting in a rate of 1 in 246 all-cause deaths within 60 days of receiving a Covid vaccination. I note that this concerning figure is not inconsistent with the current elevated rates of all cause mortality we are experiencing.

All cause deaths in New Zealand are currently running at a record level of 930 per week and rising which is 35% above the long term average, whilst weekly ‘because of Covid’ deaths peaked at 143 and are now decreasing.

As you know, older people are in the majority currently getting boosted. This age bracket does have a higher mortality rate, without records of vaccination status at death, the higher rate of death among the vaccinated will be going unnoticed.

Even if those being affected are predominantly older, if you put the two different analyses of the ONS data together, the important point is that the high death rate is happening to the vaccinated but not to the unvaccinated, so you are forced to conclude that something unprecedented and concerning is happening.

I don’t need to spell out the serious implications of the UK ONS data for you, they are obvious. mRNA vaccinations are very risky, they can trigger potentially fatal health events. This establishes that excess all-cause deaths are significantly related to adverse effects of Covid vaccination, especially boosters.

The UK ONS data we have highlighted is entirely objective. ONS records the vaccination status of all those dying. When these figures are graphically presented, the effects relative to vax status are even more obvious and striking.

All Cause Risk of Dying in the UK Since January 2021

I understand that you have not been receiving such information from the Ministry of Health. This is because, as I said at the outset, it is not required in New Zealand to record a person’s vaccination status on death certificates. As a result, objective analysis of cause of death has not been possible. This now needs to be required.

Newly published scientific papers should lead to revised pandemic policy

During the last few weeks, a number of scientific papers have been published which should be of great interest to the New Zealand government.

These include a study from Qatar finding that unvaccinated people, who have recovered from a Covid infection, are 97% protected from serious Covid reinfection outcomes in the longer term.

A preprint study from Thailand found that 29% of adolescents suffer cardiac irregularities following their second jab.

A study from Iceland shows that the vaccinated are particularly vulnerable to reinfection and that this effect is stronger among younger age groups.

The Danish government has stopped offering Covid vaccination to those under 18 years and is currently considering stopping it for all those under 50.

Crucially Rochelle Walensky, director of the CDC, has flagged the need for a complete rethink after missteps as reported by Bloomberg, Walensky said:

“For 75 years, CDC and public health have been preparing for Covid-19, and in our big moment, our performance did not reliably meet expectations. I want us all to do better and it starts with CDC leading the way.My goal is a new, public health action-oriented culture at CDC that emphasizes accountability, collaboration, communication, and timeliness.”

Government pandemic experts and advisors are not required to defend their policies in public forums

On July 12th I wrote to the Hon. Andrew Little asking him:

We wish to reiterate in conclusion that it is very necessary and critical to seek clear and unequivocal data concerning the prevalence of the specific conditions which are overloading hospitals and GPs. No consistent causal analysis is possible without this information. This data should be freely available to a wider range of independent competent analysts and researchers so that you may receive better advice.”

I received a reply to the effect that he had forwarded the information to the Ministry of Health for review, but I have heard nothing further and I am not aware of any action being taken.

For the last two years your advisors at the Ministry of Health have been allowed to offer the government advice unchallenged by the need for debate. Encouraged by your insistence on “one source of truth”, the media have also given them a free ride and simultaneously attacked anybody raising questions about vaccine safety. This has created a distorted perception of safety among the general public.

The investigation of such effects will remain unavailable as long as Covid vaccination status is omitted from death certificates and as long as your advisors are not required to defend their positions in a public forum. These positions are inconsistent with international standards and policies.

I note that fifteen months ago I was in support of New Zealand’s pandemic policies. My personal support for the government’s pandemic initiatives evaporated as a result of my professional assessment of continuing Covid science publishing. See here a consultant cardiologist speaking on primetime UK television about his concerns that pandemic advice to governments from medical professionals has failed to take account of evolving scientific findings.

Without revision of pandemic policy all cause deaths will continue at unacceptable levels

Early on in the pandemic you and your government, in agreement with all other parties, appeared to be acting in good faith based on the advice you had been given. Subsequently it has become obvious that mRNA vaccination methods have adverse effects that go beyond those of any previous vaccines. Most people involved in decision-making underestimated the mobility, toxicity, and persistence of genetic sequences and adjuvants in the vaccine.

The time has come now to revise current New Zealand mRNA vaccination protocols. The latest research and UK ONS data unequivocally show that the loss of life and obfuscation of data involved with continuing current protocols is both substantial and unacceptable.

Continued faith in and reliance on the title ‘vaccine’ (when applied to mRNA injections), as an apparent guarantee of efficacy and safety, is misplaced and foolhardy, as well as misleading for the public.

All political parties need to revise their pandemic knowledge base according to continuing Covid science publishing.

I believe you are in a position to use your communication skills to take a lead in this process and initiate an appropriate public discussion of the limitations of current policy and the possible remedies. In the absence of appropriate debate, we are facing continuing unprecedented record high levels of all-cause mortality including impacts on working age and young people. This is a serious and deteriorating situation which demands immediate action.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

Is there such a thing as ‘mRNA Covid Vaccine Syndrome’?

0

Is there such a thing as ‘mRNA Covid Vaccine Syndrome’? If so, what are its symptoms and how serious is it?

Excess all cause deaths are on the rise around the world. Why?

Here is a comparison of New Zealand weekly all cause deaths 2020-2022. The official Ministry of Health Covid weekly death tally for 2022 is also graphed on the same axis.

All cause deaths have just broken 900 per week—a record. The official tally of Covid deaths peaked at 143, this rate is now falling. Yet all cause deaths continue to rise towards 950. This graph shows that there are currently 800 deaths per week whose causes have not been publicly identified by the Ministry of Health.

The Ministry of Health, mainstream media, and the government would be very happy if we all naively concluded that Covid infection and its aftermath is tragically to blame for the record rate of deaths and nothing else.

As long as the cause of death for the 800 per week unexplained deaths is not released, there is no way of knowing what is really happening. On this point so far there has been deafening silence from the Ministry of Health and the government.

There are other methods to quickly settle any dispute. Figures just released in the UK by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) point in another, but equally tragic direction. ONS data for all cause mortality includes Covid vaccination status. See for example:

When this information is graphed the implications become clear:

All Cause Risk of Dying in the UK Since January 2021

All Cause Risk of Dying in the UK Since January 2021

Leave aside for the moment the technicality of person-years, your risk of dying from any cause increases dramatically the more doses of Covid vaccine you have received, whereas the unvaccinated have far far better mortality outcomes than any vax group. (Graphing credit: David Dickson)

In summary, the unvaccinated make up 25% of the UK population yet have only a 4% mortality rate per hundred thousand person-years. The boosted compose 50% of the population but have a 86% mortality rate.

ONS figures which separate Covid deaths from non-Covid deaths show that this breakdown is consistent.

I don’t need to spell out the serious implications of this for you, they are obvious and irrefutable. mRNA vaccinations are very risky and potentially fatal, especially boosters.

A helpful and revealing perspective on the ONS figures calculated by The Expose shows that 1 in every 246 vaccinated persons has died in the UK within 60 days of receiving a Covid vaccination. To put this in perspective, the smallpox vaccine is considered very dangerous because 2 in every 2 million people die from its side effects.

This establishes beyond any doubt that excess all-cause deaths are related to a significant extent to adverse effects of Covid vaccination. We are left to ask what are the adverse effects at issue?

Because health authorities around the world are deliberately not revealing cause of death data to the public, at this point in time we can only string together a patchwork of strong hints and conclusions derived from published data, microbiological research, theoretical genetic considerations, autopsies, personal reports, VAERS data, insurance stats, Pfizer data, and data analysis

The possible causal candidates include the following in no particular order, (this is by no means an exhaustive list):

  • Cancers
  • Autoimmune Disease
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Neurological Disease
  • Immune Deficiency
  • Kidney and Liver Disease
  • Respiratory Illness
  • Stroke
  • Blood Clots
  • Cognitive Decline

Over the last four days Stuff newspaper has led with several brutal attacks on individuals and organisations who have publicly raised questions about the safety of the experimental mRNA vaccine. Stuff accused such people of seeking to make New Zealand ungovernable by spreading waves of disinformation and hate.

Just reread the above UK statistics for a moment, while Stuff wipes the egg off its face. They are asking the wrong questions and are being paid very well by our government for their efforts which they refer to as The Whole Truth (?)

Take for example today’s Stuff headline Covid-19 NZ: The numbing relentlessness of the 1700 deaths we know very little about”. Stuff should additionally be asking about the 50,000+ New Zealand deaths since mRNA vaccination began, deaths that we know almost nothing about.

Let’s compare the reliability of the UK ONS data with the reliability of the adjusted New Zealand Ministry of Health data used by Stuff.

The UK ONS data we have highlighted is entirely objective. ONS records the vaccination status of all those dying, and then these figures are graphically presented. The conclusions are obvious and striking.

New Zealand Ministry of Health data is now based on subjective assessments and adjustments to cause of death including what amounts to a guess by Ministry of Health administrators as to how much Covid was involved (was it with Covid or because of Covid?).

My mother in law, who had a number of long-standing serious chronic health issues, died in May a couple of days after a sudden stroke at age 93, a month after recovering from Omicron. Her death was described to my wife and I as “a horrible Covid death”.

You can see what is happening can’t you? Fear of Covid is influencing assessments about the actual cause of death and biasing public data.

Today’s Stuff article asked us to look beyond the statistics and think for a moment about the large number of personal tragedies involved. I agree that the circumstances deserve the utmost respect and sympathy, but as long as statistics are adjusted, distorted, withheld, or hidden, all those families affected by the pandemic may never know the real cause of their tragedy.

Yesterday by chance I met an old friend we had not seen for a number of years. I told them I had a website reporting on Covid vaccination outcomes. She said “Oh, so you are talking about what they aren’t telling us”. Yes, that is precisely it. The Ministry of Health has entirely obfuscated pandemic mortality data by omitting to adopt sufficiently objective criteria.