At this point in the Covid pandemic saga, the public is still faced with an information blackout.

The data is very concerning indeed, but no one in parliament or MSM wants to get in front of it. Instead many are still stuck stoking the fear factor. As Prof. Vinay Prasad, an American hematologist-oncologist and health researcher, wrote today: Legitimising irrational anxiety is bad medicine.

Early on in our efforts to publicise the dangers of biotechnology medicine, Guy had an email exchange with Jesse Mulligan, popular commentator with RNZ Afternoons. Jesse’s perspective on Covid vaccination was as follows:

Dec 6th 2021 “I feel like anybody aiming to critique such an obviously positive public health measure should begin and end their messaging reminding people that any risks/flaws in the vaccine are minor compared to the horrific impacts of getting Covid….I don’t have the time to correspond with you on this at length but, for what it’s worth, if you’re putting people off getting a largely safe vaccine by what you’re writing about it, I think you need to review how you approach writing these messages.”

Dec 7th 2021 “It’s not your caution I object to but the predictable effect it has in putting people off the vaccine…..I’d say you have the choice whether to use this data to educate and question (which I am keen on) vs lining it up to try and convince people they should fear or think twice about getting the vaccine.”

Jesse quoted from Ministry of Health directives and had also read some questioning scientific articles, but he could not get past the conclusion that vaccination was an obvious public good and for this reason, he declined to have Guy on air.

The ‘obvious public good’ narrative has come in for some recent criticism. The BMJ printed an opinion piece in July entitled “Time to assume that health research is fraudulent until proven otherwise?“. Or try this referenced substack article which reports that the negative harm/benefit ratio in the Moderna and Pfizer vaccine trials has been acknowledged in a scientific journal article. In other words, there is more harm than benefit.

We wonder what is Jesse’s assessment of current evidence? He is on our mailing list, but the correspondence has only been one way since Dec 7th.

An Underlying Assumption That Biotech Medicine Interventions Are Safe

For us, the central early point of pandemic misinformation has been the underlying assumption that biotech medicine interventions could be safe.

There really was little or no evidence to justify such an attitude, in fact, as we have discussed, there was a great deal of published pre-pandemic evidence to justify caution. It seems to me that Jesse and most other MSM pandits were probably under-informed on this point.

Given the central role of DNA in human physiology, altering its function was from the outset potentially catastrophic. We are now facing Covid vaccine outcomes that not only involve serious individual adverse effects but also potentially affect whole populations in the longer term. These outcomes include:

• Elevated excess all-cause death rates and lowered longevity
• Lowered birth rates and fertility

The evidence for these is patchy because governments are not rushing to publish data, but it is still very convincing. So concerning in fact, that the Israeli government has covered up key data and scientific conclusions.

The latest comprehensive evidence for Covid vaccine induced excess all cause mortality can be found in a just published analysis: Excess mortality in Germany 2020-2022.

Sudden Deaths Among All Ages are Being Normalised

It is extraordinary how this perilous new normal has found its way into advertising messages, but not into serious commentary. Today we watched a TV ad for a funeral home which arranges alternative and appropriate funerals for those dying young, whilst a British Heart Foundation appeal featured a young woman collapsing on the football field. It did so in order to encourage donations.

Sudden deaths among all ages are being normalised in the public’s mind because they really are happening at a rate that dwarfs the past, as insurance data confirms. However here in New Zealand, we are still being subjected to puerile government advertising devoid of scientific caution. Like this MoH promotion which turned up this morning:

GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER—I’ve had three shots, do I really need another booster? Current evidence shows your protection against severe infection slowly decreases over time—GET YOUR SECOND BOOSTER

No mention of safety, no mention of efficacy, and the term ‘current evidence’ is bandied about inappropriately as if this advert is scientifically up to date and reliable. It isn’t

So why has it become so unfashionable to be concerned about rising death rates and lowered birth rates? You might find a clue in this frightening pre-pandemic article from the government-owned Canadian Broadcasting Corporation “Medically assisted deaths could save millions in health care spending: Report”. Are higher death rates good news for people with this kind of perspective? We hope not.

Are we being too harsh? No. This involves the health and life of young people on the doorstep of a bright future.

In the Uncertain Covid Climate of Fear

When teaching, kindness and understanding go a long way towards improving communication and successful learning. We are clearly on a learning curve here. The poor vaccination outcomes were never anticipated, the adverse effects were initially disbelieved on principle, and blamed on misinformation.

We can understand that, in the uncertain Covid climate of fear, people took sides and trusted the official Ministry of Health narrative, but continuing to do so now doesn’t fit the published scientific narrative or the public data. Caution was and is a very scientific strategy, it never deserved bad press.

We’re reaching out here. Those offering advice to the public need to be more discerning if they wish to contribute to the well being and longevity of our society. MSM language has become extreme, and it is increasingly polarising without a foundation in science.

The sad reality is that medicine is a very conservative profession. Most medical procedures are locked in during training and seldom challenged for years after. Biotechnology interventions lie outside of the boundaries of past medical practice. What we need to do without anger, politics, or extremism is to talk through the fear of Covid and discuss the risks of biotechnology.

There is still a chance for seasoned journalists to cover the pandemic with an open mind. It is happening elsewhere. GB News for example has gained one of the largest prime time news audiences in the UK. Why not initiate a more open public debate? Cooling rhetoric and decreasing polarisation can only lead to better outcomes. Fresh air never harms anyone, it can save lives.

Co-Authors: Guy Hatchard and Narayani Hatchard

What are the wider implications for personal health, pandemic policy and mitigation strategies?

For some time there have been anecdotal reports circulating concerning the appearance and formation of unusual rubbery blood clots which have been detected in Covid vaccinated individuals who have died.

Some embalmers, pathologists, and funeral home directors have noted extensive white proteinous fibrous structures blocking arteries, unique in their experience, which may have played a role in the etiology and pathology of fatal illness.

If you have been following the issue, you will have seen photographs and/or videos of these structures like this short video from a concerned British funeral home owner, or you might have heard senior US pathologist Dr Ryan Cole discuss the phenomenon.

This issue is contentious and the subject of sceptical comment from some quarters, but the record number of unexplained deaths, even among the young, and the relentless and reckless promotion of mRNA vaccines points to a need for closer investigation.

Dr Jessica Rose, a postdoc biochemist, who blogs on Substack and podcasts on Audible, has released a probing scientific analysis of the possible causes of this widely recognised clotting phenomenon under the title “Is the spike protein acting as a prion with regard to haemoglobin molecules? And is porphyria being induced?”. This article is both highly technical and partly speculative, but it is worth extracting some of the take home warnings and conclusions.

First of all note that this is the kind of precautionary post trial analysis that was omitted by Pfizer and others as they rushed mRNA vaccines to market. The reason behind 10 year approval cycles for previous vaccines is precisely because unexpected effects in the vaccine research field are the norm rather than the exception. The introduction of biotech jabs should have raised red flags about the short trial time frames, but it didn’t.

Dr Rose examines the possibility that the Covid mRNA vaccination causes haemolysis (rupture of red blood cells) releasing massive amounts of haemoglobin. And then asks: does the spike protein, due to its amyloidogenic peptides, trigger misfolding of the haemoglobin into amyloid fibrils causing subsequent blood clots and oxygen incapacity?

In other words, does the spike protein have prion-like properties that are causing chain clotting reactions (including microclots) which can cause death? Dr Rose thinks the answer to this question is a ‘YES’ and calls for more research to investigate the phenomenon.

Prions are pathogens that cause disease because of their misfolded shape rather than their biology. Misfolded proteins do not function like their correctly folded cousins and they are associated with neuro-degenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease. Prions can transform or ‘teach’ other proteins to misfold. It’s not really teaching as much as the disallowance of proper folding in adjacent proteins which then spreads further.

Disease-causing prions can resist proteolysis – the process which under normal conditions removes misfolded proteins. Protected from correction, prions can initiate an autocatalytic chain reaction which forms alien obstructive structures in the physiology. In Mad Cow Disease for example a prion chain reaction progressively replaces healthy structures in the brain.

Dr Rose outlines a plausible chain of events in the blood along with supporting evidence from VAERS data. According to Dr Rose, the reported incidence of porphyria, a rare disease normally caused by genetic defects, has increased in VAERS data by 17,265% when compared to years prior to the introduction of mRNA vaccination.

Porphyrins play a key role in the chain of reactions that produce haemoglobin. Porphyria is an accumulation of porphyrins in the liver or bone marrow due to defects in the porphyrin development pathway.

In addition to a wide range of severe physical and mental symptoms, porphyria can be associated with haemoglobin instability. Rupture of red blood cells is a necessary precondition for the release of unstable haemoglobin proteins susceptible to misfolding.

The increased incidence of porphyria raises another important safety issue which has consistently dogged the introduction of new drugs, vaccines, and even novel food ingredients. There is often an underlying assumption that chemical, physiological, biological, or genetic components perform single functions in isolation. This is invariably incorrect. Most have multiple roles. Altering one function, in the hope of correcting a single imbalance, can affect a whole range of other systems and outcomes.

Acute porphyria, in addition to physical symptomatology such as abdominal pain, has a psychiatric manifestations include hysteria, anxiety, depression, phobias, psychosis, organic disorders, agitation, delirium, and altered consciousness ranging from somnolence to coma. Some patients develop psychosis similar to schizophrenia. All of these effects come down to a dysfunction in physical red blood cell formation.

As we have discussed previously, psychological effects of genetic and epigenetic interventions including mRNA vaccines remains a largely unexplored field, but not one where safety can be assumed a priori. Yet that is precisely what has happened. Absence of evidence (since no one has looked for or measured effects) is not evidence of absence.

There is currently a lot of Covid hysteria, anxiety, agitation, and even phobia without much of a scientific or rational basis especially when you sit back and examine current Covid science publishing and data.

In summary, a whole range of naive safety assumptions have dogged the roll out of mRNA technology, and we have not yet adequately assessed the final outcomes of mRNA serious adverse effects.

Dr Rose raises a number of questions that require more investigation. Importantly, she urges extreme caution concluding:

“Everyone needs to know why it’s essential not to introduce potential agents to disrupt the haemoglobin forming and clotting pathways [as the spike protein induced by mRNA vaccination does]. There are so many ways that things can go wrong. Which, is again, why I don’t understand why there are so many exceedingly arrogant humans who think it’s a good idea to mess with biology [using biotechnology].”

At the Hatchard Report we have already written about the persistence of the spike protein for months after mRNA vaccination and its capacity to accumulate in diverse organ systems. For this reason, it is clear that mRNA vaccine induced clotting can potentially affect all our organ systems in diverse areas of the physiology. The extent of this effect varies from individual to individual. There are currently inadequate procedures in the New Zealand health system to monitor such effects post vaccination or post mortem in order to investigate their extent more closely.

We started out by considering the causes of fibrous proteinous blood clots among the vaccinated, but by taking a wider angle of consideration we have realised that genetic interventions can threaten the holistic stability of life including even mental stability. Genetic structures connect mind and body.

All-cause mortality has surged to unprecedented levels around the world initiating the sharpest fall in longevity in 100 years. There is really only one sensible course of action—an energetic multidisciplinary approach to assess the range of adverse effects of human genetic intervention. The effort should be aimed squarely at pausing biotech and finding mitigating health strategies. This will require open minds. Successful mitigation will have to identify, include, and encourage proven dietary and lifestyle initiatives. Carrying on with present policies regardless is not an option.

Which only leads us back to our very own incautious blinkered government, health advisors, and administrators who this week ramped up the advertising budget yet again to encourage second boosters for everyone and a fifth shot for those with immune deficiencies; completely ignoring accumulating evidence that mRNA vaccination itself causes immune deficiency, while boosters are associated with increased all-cause mortality.

Our government has also launched a new advertising campaign praising the recent closure of District Health Boards and the introduction of centralised control of medicine. According to the advertising campaign, there are now more opportunities for contactless virtual medical consultations. In other words, you don’t need to meet a doctor in person, you can get your medical help directly from…who?? Hopefully it’s not the central government.

The UK government recommends against offering the Pfizer Covid mRNA vaccine for pregnant women, those who might suspect that they could be pregnant, and anyone who is breastfeeding.

A carefully nuanced statement within a document entitled “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” (the latest revised version released on 16th August 2022) says:

“In the context of supply under Regulation 174, it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.…Women of childbearing potential….are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. These judgements reflect the absence of data at the present time..”

The report concludes there never was any safety data for pregnant or lactating mothers and blames the rush to get everyone vaccinated for the lack of caution and incorrect safety advice previously offered by the government.

Here in distant New Zealand, which has been deliberately isolated from international information by our government, we are still being subjected to government advertising and MSM promotional articles advising that it is recommended for pregnant people (??) to take the experimental mRNA biotech shot including boosters.

In contrast to the UK government, pregnant mothers are advised that there are no safety issues or uncertainties.

Yet our all-cause mortality is running at 35% above the long term average.

Rising all cause Deaths are Related to Booster Uptake

The UK government has thereby provided an answer to just one question among the many that remain unanswered. Prominent substack writer Steve Kirsh lists 23 unanswered questions about the safety of mRNA Covid vaccines.

Over the last many months, Mr. Kirsh has offered large sums of money to any vaccine-advocating scientists who will debate these questions with him. There have been no takers.

Among the 23 questions, the prize goes to the gathering dark shadow of rising all cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries across the globe. Mathematician Igor Chudov has given mathematical and statistical validity to what is obvious if you look at graphs of all-cause mortality.

His linear regression of publicly available official death data from 29 countries, calculates an ironclad statistical relationship between booster rates and deaths (p= 0.0002 or 99.98% certainty). In other words, boosters and deaths go together like bread and butter. The statistical details are linked here.

The refusal to publicly debate safety despite mounting and overwhelming evidence of related deaths, marks vaccine advocates as aspiring members of a ruling elite who believe themselves above accountability, ethics, and human rights.

Curiously if any among their number changes sides and entertains counter safety data, they are cast aside. Dr. Vinay Prasad, Dr. Mobeen Syed, Dr. Aseem Malhotra, Dr. John Campbell, and many, many others started out their public commentaries strongly in favour of Covid vaccination. They are all vaccinated. Now they are all very publicly raising alarm bells about safety, but refer any vaccine advocate to their work (if you can) and these responsible doctors are rejected as unreliable (no reasons given).

How Have the Covid Ruling Elites Formed?

Ruling elites rely on enforcement of power structures and supremacy myths. They are often members of a single ethnic, professional or political group. They exclude and persecute those raising questioning or dissenting voices.

Such groups can attract narcissistic personalities and psychopaths (a serious personality disorder characterized by antisocial behavior, untruthfulness, irresponsibility, and lack of remorse or empathy) to join their ranks. Among ruling elites there is little room for debate or rationality.

The 4 C’s—careerism, conformism, coercion, and corruption are very busy around the world propping up the Covid vaccine safety narrative against evidence that has now become overwhelming.

In New Zealand, we are writing the book on suppression of information in order to save the reputation and protect the pockets of our ruling elites. To achieve this, the health of pregnant women and their unborn children, as well as the longevity of the population, including the very young, appear to have been judged expendable.

The use of CRISPR-Cas9 to edit genes was thrust into the spotlight ten years ago in 2012 when George Church, Jennifer Doudna, Emmanuelle Charpentier, and Feng Zhang harnessed it as a tool to modify targeted regions of genomes.

A discovery that earned Doudna and Charpentier a Nobel prize. Given its potential to revolutionize gene editing, Science magazine named CRISPR Breakthrough of the Year in 2015.

Biotech PR went into high gear announcing that an era of precise, safe gene editing and biotech therapy had arrived, promising better crops and livestock, as well as the faultless cure of diseases and genetic defects.

By 2017, it had become apparent that problems were surfacing. Multiple scientists were raising red flags. A summary in New Scientist 18 July 2018 headlined “CRISPR gene editing is not quite as precise and as safe as thought”.

A study of CRISPR by Allan Bradley of the Wellcome Sanger Institute in the UK and others found that in animal and human cell CRISPR experiments around a fifth of cells showed unexpected deletions or rearrangements more than 100 DNA letters long. These surprising changes are sometimes thousands of letters long.

Bradley noted some groups were developing treatments that would involve using genetic techniques to edit billions of cells inside the human body (sound familiar?). There’s a chance that a few of these cells might turn cancerous, he said:

“There’s a risk of causing cancer sometime in a patient’s lifetime. We need to understand more before rushing into human clinical trials.”

A paper published in Cell in 2020 examining CRISPR’s possible use on human embryos found that in more than half of the cases, the editing caused unintended changes, such as loss of an entire chromosome or big chunks of it—sufficient to cause life ending medical conditions.

The general conclusion was that editing of genetic and epigenetic systems carries risks of unintended consequences, and that genetic mobility and rearrangement of genetic sequences is a common outcome. Great caution was advised

Come the pandemic panic of January 2020 and the consequent loosening of the already inadequate safety protocols surrounding genetic experimentation. There followed the warp speed approval of barely tested mRNA vaccines. Then there was the pressure on governments:

Giving evidence to Parliament in May 2021, Dominic Cummings, chief advisor to Boris Johnson, said:

‘The conventional wisdom was that we were not going to be able to have any vaccines in 2020. In March, I started getting calls from various people saying, “These new MRNA vaccines could well smash the conventional wisdom, and don’t necessarily stick to it.” – People like Bill Gates and that kind of network were saying that.’

There was no mention of mainstream scientific caution about biotech safety. The potential profits were mouth-watering. The introduction of gene therapy-based vaccines to billions of people, without any necessity to warn them of the well known risks, was all set to roll.

18 months on the situation has become apocalyptic:

• All cause deaths in highly vaccinated countries worldwide are rising far in excess of pre-pandemic levels.
• VAERS data shows that cancer incidence is rocketing.
• ‘Unknown cause of death’ has become the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada.
• In other places, doctors are just guessing at causes of sudden death on death certificates.
• Insurance claims among working age people are rising steeply.
• Funeral homes are working at 30% or more above pre-pandemic levels.
• In the rare cases where autopsies are performed, also noticed by embalmers, strange white proteinous self-assembling masses in arteries are implicated in blood clot formation.
• Athletic youngsters and aging champions alike are falling ill and dying

You might think that there would be pause for thought, but you would be wrong. Government authorities are so far down the track, that it is proving difficult if not impossible to turn around. Instead they are doubling down.

• In Queensland teachers who didn’t vaccinate are facing compulsory pay cuts.
• An Australian journalist asking questions about pandemic policy was refused entry to New Zealand due to his “character.”
• Two New Zealand journalists had their house raided, computers seized and were arrested for suggesting that some vaccine proponents might have committed criminal offences.
• Ten police turned up at a doorstep to arrest a lady who attended the peaceful parliament protest 6 months ago (ten police to one woman?).
• Pro-vaccine funded scientists are busy misrepresenting Covid data to reassure the public that there is nothing out of the ordinary and recommending more coercive vaccine and mask mandates.
• In the UK and other highly vaccinated countries bivalent mRNA vaccines have been approved in the absence of safety data.
• In Canada the courts have ruled that it is not unconstitutional to deny access to life saving health services to the unvaccinated.

Just reflect for a moment that the predatory commercial arm of the biotech industry has achieved a sought after goal:

• Risky experiments on human populations have been normalised,
• Generously funded by governments,
• Granted indemnity from prosecution,
• Supported by trusted media outlets.
• Acceptable rates of adverse effects have been raised by 5000%
• Doctors, medical professionals, and administrators have been generously paid or coerced into compliance.
• The public has been thoroughly indoctrinated by a paid propaganda blitz.
• Probing questions are cancelled by social media.

It is open season for biotech shots and no one involved in the gravy train is going to give that up without a fight. Dozens of new biotech vaccines are in the development pipeline, all hoping to cash in on the tsunami of death.

The battle lines have been drawn. On the one side vested interests with deep pockets, the modern medical establishment, and governments seeking ultimate control over personal choice, are urging on the majority of highly vaccinated people whose health is deteriorating rapidly but whose belief in final vaccine victory remains undimmed.

On the other hand, small bands of cautious unvaccinated individuals, rational scientists, and alternative media have their health, but are facing unprecedented criticism and cancellation. They have been labelled violent fascists determined to undermine democracy.

No one recalls or references the well known severe risks of biotech interventions which are detailed in multiple reputable journals pre-pandemic.

No one in authority will reference any current publishing that raises red flags. Instead they are blindly intent on making everyone comply with Covid vaccination policies and presumably in the near future with more novel biotech vaccines covering a wide range of illnesses.

For centuries it has been held that free will is what distinguishes us from animals, take that away and what are we left with?

The publication and analysis of damning official data from the UK, Israel, and all points of the compass (see here and here) has established that Covid vaccination is driving adverse effects and all-cause deaths on an unprecedented scale.

Suddenly a few officials are offering apologies. Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Director of the US CDC, told us last week that they had got their pandemic response wrong.

The adverse effects and death data is so definitive that lawyers are warning officials to change tack or face prosecution. A law firm in Australia has warned AHPRA (Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Authority) that they were breaking the law when they forbade doctors and other health professionals from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables.

Even Google owned YouTube is quietly changing its censorship policy. You are now allowed to post a video asserting that masks don’t work, previously your work would have been deleted. However, a school in mask-loving California called the police when a four year old took off his mask and refused to put it back on. He was taken home by the police and excluded from school for a week.

In the UK, the JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation) advised the government to approve the new bivalent Moderna mRNA Covid vaccine. What were they thinking? They did so without adequate safety data, apparently on the basis that we have done it once and got away with it, so why not have another go? View a list of guilty JCVI members here.

An article in the Washington Post entitled “Your first brush with coronavirus could affect how a booster works” reprinted in Stuff illustrates just how far scientists are willing to go in order to retain their options to experiment on the general population.

The nuanced discussion claims that mRNA vaccines were initially spectacularly successful (???), but concedes that they no longer work because of immune system imprinting (aka original antigenic sin), and even goes as far as admitting they almost certainly won’t work in future.

Even so, it quotes scientists urging the development and use of revamped mRNA technology including bivalent vaccines, nasal vaccines, vaccines at birth, and vaccines tailored to individuals (none of which according to the article are likely to work very well, if at all).

Crucially the article makes no mention of adverse effects of RNA vaccination or rising excess all-cause deaths, instead scientists argue that the pandemic response has not worked but has been overall “a good thing”—an oxymoron. They must be really worried about the longevity of their research grants, but not so worried about the longevity of the world’s population.

The most memorable quote from the article is in the last sentence: Christian Gaebler, an assistant professor of clinical investigation at the Rockefeller University says:

“If someone says they fully understood this, they would be lying.”

Here in little New Zealand the penny has not yet dropped among the general public. Why would it? Over 90% of the population are Pfizer vaccinated and the unvaccinated have been publicly designated (by all political parties, the government, MSM, and academia) as terrorists determined to make the country ungovernable. Any public u-turn would be immensely embarrassing.

New Zealand has become party-central for government overreach. Herd-immunity, adverse effects of mRNA vaccination, and lab-leak theories have all been officially labelled by a government funded research institution as baseless conspiracy theories. MSM have elevated the charge to treason.

All three of these concepts are the subject of copious academic publishing and debate. Excluding them from public discussion or labelling them as false amounts to an attempt to subvert the scientific process. A couple of days ago Brett Sutton, Chief Medical Officer of the Australian state of Victoria, tweeted that the lab leak theory was proven false beyond doubt. He doesn’t appear to be following science publishing.

See for example this analysis which argues that recently published studies advocating a zoonotic origin of Covid-19 suffered from ascertainment bias. In other words, their case sampling concentrated around the Wuhan Seafood Market because scientists assumed from the outset that it must have begun there. As a result they omitted to cast a wider sampling net which might have disproved the theory. Statistically equivalent to asking only train drivers if they liked railways, then concluding that all people like railways.

From this point, any politician, media outlet, or health professional who continues to claim the universal safety and effectiveness of Covid vaccination and its applicability for the young has either neglected to inform themselves or they are being willfully misleading.

Anyone who casually blames climate change, holiday heart syndrome, or a host of other excuses for the rising rate of all cause deaths is not only barking up the wrong tree, but they are also confusing the public and obstructing the course of justice.

I am surprised New Zealand media reprinted the Washington Post article, it doesn’t fit with their prior publishing, but then again maybe the tide is beginning to turn even here. We are still waiting for a public discussion offering honest and complete information about risks in a form that can be readily understood.

Formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Guy is the author of Discovering and Defending Your DNA Diet

We have been wondering where all this is going. As time goes by, some longer-term outcomes are becoming apparent.

Excess all-cause mortality is rising around the world, especially in countries with high vaccination rates like New Zealand, Australia, and Portugal.

What are the implications for the world and the potential pathways ahead?

Curiously, resolutions, good or bad, might not be a matter of political decisions or scientific research, but largely a matter of rapidly worsening health outcomes. If all cause mortality continues to rise, there will be a tipping point beyond which what is currently considered normal will no longer be viable.

Our Situation Here in Highly Vaccinated New Zealand Allows us to Examine Possible Scenarios.

As reported previously, Kiwis are seven times sicker than before the pandemic. Businesses are struggling to find workers, some have closed their doors forever. The hospitality industry is reportedly on its knees all over the country.

School attendance has fallen. More than half of the country’s school students failed to attend class regularly in the first term of the year, a record. North of Auckland for example only 34% of students are regularly entering the classroom, compared with 64.4% in 2019 – the year before the pandemic hit.

A survey of more than 900 doctors has revealed that our health workforce is at risk of ‘catastrophic collapse’. Their letter to Jacinda Ardern reports: 

“So many [doctors and nurses] are off sick that we have to close areas of the department or work there on our own with no nursing support…” 

4,000 people have been waiting for more than a year to see a specialist.

The Government and the Health Service are in Denial

Andrew Little, Minister of Health, responded to the doctors in July 

“I’m satisfied that we have the means to get on top of the issues.”

Since then, the winter Covid wave has subsided, but the health crisis has not gone away, it has got worse as all-cause mortality climbs steadily past previous records. Last week recorded all-cause deaths were 946, 35% above the long term average and trending up.

At what point will people ask why are they constantly falling sick and why are they finding that others are in the same boat? Few people are aware of the rising death rate because the government is not analysing the figures and mainstream media is not asking questions, but it can’t remain hidden forever and in any case its influence will be felt whether we realise the cause or not.

As we reported last week, UK ONS figures show that the health crisis is predominantly affecting the vaccinated. If the unvaccinated are excluded from the workforce through mandates, we are shooting ourselves in the foot. Their long term health is the least affected by the pandemic.

Tipped Over the Edge by Biotechnology

A global Covid inoculation scheme has drawn billions of people into what is essentially a biotechnology experiment whose outcome was unknown.

The resulting health crisis has no precedents—it involves genetic manipulation of the immune system function. Is it reversible? No one really knows. We have entered uncharted territory.

The immune system makes quintillions of decisions and effects repairs in our physiology everyday. More than 70,000 daily repairs in each cell for example, and we each have 37 trillion cells. From the outset, believing that immune system function could be fundamentally altered without compromising our health was a pipe dream.

The Extent of Long Term Outcomes is Almost Unimaginable

Increased rates of all cause mortality and greater numbers of sick people imply that longevity is being reduced. This implies fewer people in the workforce.

More sick people means that a larger number of people are involved in looking after them, which reduces overall productivity and economic output.

The nature of increased illness is important. Cancers, heart disease, and neurological illness all have larger longer term effects and require more carers.

Even small changes in the balance of social indicators, especially health outcomes, can have huge effects on macroeconomic conditions. Currently, changes are accelerating and snowballing. Citi Bank predicts that UK inflation will hit 18% next year. it would be a mistake to assume this is solely due to energy pricing.

For almost three years there has been a large measure of Covid pandemic uncertainty, fear, and stress networking itself throughout society and the world. It is driving irrationality, panic buying, price gouging, profiteering, and misdirected anger.

Can Politicians, Medical Professionals, and Our Press Change Gear?

They are not doing very well at present.

We still don’t know the full extent or duration of the problems associated with mRNA vaccination. Does it cause cognitive decline or is it increasing cancer rates in the general population? If so, by how much? There is a growing realization that health authorities and governments have pushed these questions aside.

In some cases, data has been deliberately withheld or manipulated. See for example this video from GB News (watch from 27 minutes to 40 minutes) which contains footage of a zoom meeting between Israeli Ministry of Health officials and researchers in early June about an official investigation verifying serious adverse effects whose concerning conclusions have remained hidden from the highly vaccinated general public.

The findings in Israel verified a causal connection to mRNA vaccination. The adverse effects got stronger after each successive vaccination. Long lasting neurological effects for example were found to be related. Serious menstrual irregularities can persist for over a year.

Despite warnings from the scientists involved in the investigation that the current Israeli government public safety narrative was highly misleading, key findings were omitted from the final report. In fact, incomplete and unrepresentative data was released by the Ministry of Health with the apparent intention of making the adverse effects appear rare or short lived. Minimisation that appears to have happened in a number of countries.

The search for curative health strategies for those affected adversely by both Covid infection and vaccination will have to involve a multidisciplinary approach that must range outside the comfort zone of modern medicine.

Lifestyle Factors are Known to Positively Affect Covid Infection Outcomes

We have already discussed published research studies showing vegetarian diets, regular exercise, some traditional herbs, and sufficient rest all significantly reduce Covid hospitalisation rates by up to 70%. Will they also alleviate the immune deficiency associated with Covid vaccination? We don’t know, but we have to find out. It’s urgent.

DNA sits at the interface between consciousness and matter. Researchers have found that meditation can influence genetic expression. Gene expression is the process which enables the DNA to produce functional proteins. A 2016 study by award-winning cancer researcher Dr. John Fagan, a former colleague of mine, presented at a Belgrade conference, reported improvements in long term meditators:

• Reduced expression of genes involved in the Stress Response
• Reduced expression of genes linked to Inflammation—which could be of importance in reducing incidence and/or severity of Covid, heart disease, arthritis, and atherosclerosis.
• 19 genes linked to Cardiovascular Disease were altered in their regulation
• 2 Tumour-Suppressor Genes were up-regulated

Is there reason here to hope that deep meditation could help correct the immune deficiency associated with Covid mRNA vaccination? Possibly.

Will more people adopt such lifestyle changes in their search for better health? It is hard to say how long people will cling to their faith in biotech shots before the truth sinks in that they are only making matters worse.

What Could Happen?

Doing nothing is not an option. In addition to rising all cause mortality, we are facing regional conflict, supply chain issues, food shortages, and global recession. A catastrophic fall in human immunity could be enough to push the world past a point of no return.

The collapse of essential services, including emergency healthcare, education, and workforce stability are not out of the realm of possibility, as we are seeing in New Zealand.

If central government fails to take a lead in charting sensible rational responses, local non-governmental initiatives, contacts, and informal safety nets could become increasingly important. Expect to see local area groups organising alternative health initiatives and food coops and banks out of necessity. Hopefully before it is too late.

Misguided attempts to mandate more biotech health measures will only intensify problems. Why is the UK government funding the new bi-variant Moderna mRNA shot without any adequate basis in scientific assessment?

On the other hand, if rational discussion becomes possible, increased cooperation in the face of challenges could lead to the cessation of any further risky biotech experimentation which is at the root of the current health crisis. It could also allow currently unforeseen solutions to germinate.

If current pandemic policies are continued regardless and genetic medicine continues to be used in defiance of obvious and ballooning safety issues, the tipping point will be passed. The potential outcomes are at best uncertain. If we continue to place our faith in discredited notions, what we remember as normality may no longer be available.

How biotech and pharmaceutical companies with the help of the Ministry of Health modelled their Covid sales strategy on investment scams.

Last week a college student (with a rich uncle) made $110 million by investing in struggling US retailer Bed Bath and Beyond. BBB’s shares were at a rock bottom $5.50, but the ‘savvy’ student invested $25 million in July which sparked market interest. The share price surged to $27, and then last Tuesday the student sold his stock for $130 million. BBB shares plummeted back down.

This phenomenon, known as meme-investing, relies on small investors tracking big investors and then making identical but small scale stock purchases themselves which drives the price up even further. Their aim is to make money on the coattails of the rich by guessing when to sell out in time. Inevitably, all but a lucky few small investors lose their stake. The wealthy investor, who initiates the scheme and chooses his time to sell, makes a massive profit.

You can see that this sort of investment strategy does not rely on any real information about the underlying strength or weakness of the company being targeted. It simply relies on the initial large stock purchase, the willingness of some small investors to join in the speculation, and then the gullibility of a great many others who believe the initial large upward stock movements point to a real value for the company. They are the ones who eventually lose out.

Cut Back to the Pandemic

Pfizer, Moderna and others announced that their vaccines were highly effective. Figures around 95% were quoted. Consequently the general public believed that the mRNA technology really worked and saved lives. There was instant mass acceptance, governments bought the vaccines thinking they were investing in public health, and also granted indemnity to big pharma.

Just as was the case with mom and pop investors buying rising stocks, there was no indication that there were any risks for the end user.

The eventual pharmaceutical company profits were massive.

The general public thought that a 95% figure meant that 95 out of every 100 people would be protected from infection (apparently very favourable odds). What Pfizer and others didn’t say was that 95% was actually a relative reduction in risk. The absolute reduction in risk of infection measured in the vaccine trials was 0.86%, meaning that only 1 out of every 119 people would be able to avoid infection specifically as a result of the vaccine. Pfizer hid this information. View this link here to watch a UK consultant cardiologist on prime time television explaining the sleight of hand involved.

Crucially Pfizer also hid the fact that the trials did not show that the vaccine would reduce the risk of hospitalisation or death, but instead caused serious adverse effects.

The stage was set for a massive misunderstanding and a catastrophic tragedy. Something that is only coming to light as the casualties and the infection rates reach successive peaks irrespective of high vaccination rates.

There never was an underlying value to the technology, and the risks were huge. There are now record levels of all cause mortality and it is not related to Covid infection. Draw your own conclusions.

No worries for Pfizer, Moderna, and their pals though, the profit is already in the bank. It is more than enough to cover any lawsuits if they ever do get to a court.

What is the Outcome?

Last week Newshub ran a piece drawing on multiple sources reporting that Kiwis are currently seven times sicker than before the pandemic. The incidence of seasonal flu, gastro bugs, respiratory illness, cough, fever, runny nose, conjunctivitis, sore throats, even foot and mouth disease are all at record levels. The piece reports that it is not due to Covid, Covid cases are currently at their lowest level since February.

Even more concerning, excess all-cause deaths are at all-time record highs and rising.

Vaccinologist and government advisor Dr. Helen Petousis-Harris said on the Newshub piece “our immunity against a whole lot of things is a little [???] bit down because we haven’t been constantly, I feel like, primed all the time. We’ve got lots and lots of different viruses coming over [from where??].” The answer according to Dr. Petousis-Harris is to “stay at home, mask-up, and keep your distance from others”. Sound familiar?

Are you, like me, a little puzzled by what Dr Petousis-Harris said? She feels like we haven’t been constantly primed?? Is that sufficient to explain a seven times increased incidence of viral illness and record levels of all cause mortality, or is it even scientific? I don’t think so.

In fact if you look at the UK ONS figures, as we have done in our last two Hatchard Report releases, it is apparent that high all cause mortality has affected the vaccinated but not the unvaccinated.

It is only a short step to realise, correctly, that the immunity of the vaccinated has declined sharply. The truth appears to be—the vaccinated have been primed to be constantly sick.

Who is to Blame?

Our government is keeping quiet and its experts are offering rather vague excuses and encouraging us to continue to follow everything that Pfizer recommends.

Open any media page and the chances are the government will be offering you advice. Today, on opening the New Zealand Herald front page, the government was advertising these encouragements to have another booster.

“The second booster will:

• Make you less likely to go to hospital
• Give you greater immunity against Covid-19, including Omicron
• Boost your immune response back to previous levels”

We have the world’s highest Covid vaccination rates, our hospitals are overwhelmed, our Omicron case rates have been the highest in the world, and we are seven times more likely to fall sick. So do you believe the government? Or do you think that another booster might be a risky investment?

Clearly those who kept secret key aspects of the Covid vaccine trial data are culpable. But why, as the full data is gradually being released by court order, is our government still following Pfizer’s lead?

The wheels of justice are slow to turn. It is often remarked that not enough people speak up publicly. If you see something, say something.

What Are the Lessons Here?

The Christchurch earthquake a few years back was a salutary reminder to take care of our foundations. If the foundations are cracked or resting on unstable ground your home is at risk. If you neglect the foundations of life, your life might get shaken.

DNA is the physical foundation of life. Altering it, or altering the way it works, as mRNA vaccines do, is so dangerous that it puts the whole structure of life at risk. It was a foolhardy enterprise from the start, one from which those who invested their faith were bound to lose out.

Biotechnology experimentation has to be controlled now if we are ever to exit the pandemic era.

There are also psychological lessons to be learned. For two years the whole world has been marooned in a state of fight or flight, unable to calm down because the fear-based information that is being made available to them is misleading and often false. Availability of truth is the psychological counterpart of physical genetic stability. Take that away and life rapidly loses its anchor.

Truth has become an unstable commodity, like the stock market, easily manipulated without reference to its real underlying value.

Every culture and religion in the world espouses a philosophy of right and wrong. Doing the right thing, being honest and truthful, are foundational principles of life.

If we allow ourselves to be governed solely by self interest irrespective of social interest and morality, we have missed the point of life. Inevitably society will begin to disintegrate. If we blindly follow others based on authority or hope, we can easily be misled and then disappointed or worse.

Covid mRNA vaccination has turned out to be a health market manipulation on a global scale. The health of millions has been affected or put at risk by a simple scam, and we still don’t know the extent of the final outcome. The real valuable currencies of life are truth and genetic stability. Both have to be recaptured and protected. That is our task.