Home Blog Page 34

The Long Read: Is mRNA Vaccination Affecting Our Psychology?

The Long Read: Is mRNA vaccination affecting our psychology? If so, how and to what extent? What can we do about it?

The police and other ‘experts’ in New Zealand are complaining that digital ‘deep fake’ tools pose a threat to our justice system. A rendering of Jacinda Ardern with a modified hairstyle is used as an example.

Meanwhile, mathematician Igor Chudov, has reported that California has joined Germany, Hungary, Taiwan, UK, and Sweden in registering a large drop in the birth rate. Read his report here.

So we have the highest rate of excess all cause mortality in the world. Our hospital system is overwhelmed. Birth rates are dropping around the world. Suicide, mental illness and violent crime is rising precipitously. The global economy is floundering. But our police are worried that someone might use their computer to make a realistic cartoon of the prime minister doing something out of character. Am I missing something here?

Yesterday a dear friend who has been helping people in New Zealand injured by the Pfizer mRNA vaccine sent me a 476 page document containing thousands of short personal accounts of vaccine injury and death.

Am I surprised that the police, like those in Uvalde Texas, have initiated no action? Rather they are anxious to close a ‘loophole’ in the law that allows people to play with their computers, but look the other way if people die suddenly and unexpectedly in large numbers.

Has the Response to the Pandemic Changed the Way We Think?

The pandemic has highlighted huge gaps in our understanding of human consciousness. We have moved rapidly and far into an era of social polarisation, which is more representative of a prelude to social conflict than a health crisis. Curiously missing is a sense of human compassion.

In the animal kingdom biting and stinging without remorse is to be expected, but we did not expect ethical considerations to be cast aside in a similar brutal fashion in our human world.

There is no doubt that the refusal to countenance moral imperatives has become deep set and entrenched during the pandemic.

In the face of mounting evidence of harm, most governments, health professionals, vaccine proponents, and commercial interests have stuck to their guns and refused to take real world data seriously.

Respected scientists asking serious questions have been ignored and cancelled.

One of the hallmarks of the heights of human sensibility is the capacity to balance the individual and the social interest with compassion.

Heroes like Nelson Mandela and Mahatma Gandhi led their long oppressed nations to freedom through years of forbearance and fortitude, which blossomed into forgiveness and understanding at the time of victory.

Our modern day leaders are rushing to cast aside hard won freedoms and rights in the service of blatantly commercial causes and overt prejudice. Nor do they shrink from promoting groundless fear and stress.

I am not alone in wondering whether Covid vaccines damage higher human functions. The capacity for moral reasoning, compassion, justice, inference, transcendence, and intuition, which mark out the high points of the human species, appears to be diminished at this time.

Anyone who is engaged in a dialogue with the authorities or publishing on the net will tell you that principles of rational thought and evidence are no longer the deciding arbiters of public truth. There is virtually nothing that qualifies as an open scientific debate taking place.

On a number of occasions pandemic commentator Steve Kirsh has offered huge financial incentives and bets, as much as $1 million, to set up publicly moderated debates, but there have been no takers.

The Structure of Human Consciousness

The origins of both human reasoning and compassion do not lie in a single gene or even a small collection of genes. They are supported by the collective functioning of the whole physiology. They find their counterpart in the balance or homeostasis of the physiology and in the operation of the immune system which protects the integrity of the physiology.

It is already well understood that drugs have both a physiological and a psychological impact, the alteration of the genetic and epigenetic basis of the physiology through genetic vaccines will not prove an exception to this rule, but will likely prove to have a more serious effect on mental disposition.

To begin to apprehend how our consciousness and physiology interact, it is necessary to investigate those traditions of knowledge which aim to understand personal consciousness. Among them is Yoga which is not a belief system, it comprises a set of practices which generate experiences sufficient to verify its philosophy.

Yoga along with many other cultural traditions expounds an underlying unity of life. It defines four forms of speech.

Everyday verbal speech and mental dialogue (or thinking) are the first two.

More subtle is the power of desire and the capacity to fulfill it.

The ultimate level of speech is referred to as ‘para’ which arises from a unity with nature in its broadest sense, something that the practice of Yoga seeks to awaken.

It amounts to our most private yet universal Self, an almost silent level of speech, a state of knowingness and pure potentiality. We will refer to this as the least excited or ground state of consciousness.

Some physical analogies might help to clarify how consciousness functions. Four levels of speech, may be said to be parallel to four states of matter: gas, liquid, solid and macroscopic quantum coherent states.

Everyday gossip is sometimes described as ‘hot air’, a gas.

Internal dialogue and monologue is more substantial and fluid like a liquid.

Our fundamental forces of desire and drive are even more substantial, persistent, and solid.

The ground state of consciousness can be likened to coherent states of matter analogous to those found in a super conductor. In coherent states of matter, individual atoms merge together in a quantum state of coordination and collectively gain access to seemingly impossible abilities like frictionless flow.

Consciousness is absolutely the fundamental of the human condition. It is also well established that consciousness plays a pivotal role in physical theory.

The evolution of quantum states is very instructive. Quantum states evolve as an abstract wave function—a superposition of all possible states in a virtual Hilbert space—until an intervention of consciousness, a measurement, takes place and the wave function collapses into a definite physical state.

In a sense, the ground state of consciousness operates as the quantum field of all possibilities. Poets have reported the most settled state of mind as a connection to the intelligence of nature.

Familiarity with that state of unity is said to give rise to the spontaneous expression of that which is useful in the moment. For example William Wordsworth wrote:

“….that blessed mood,

In which the burthen of the mystery,

In which the heavy and the weary weight

Of all this unintelligible world,

Is lightened:—that serene and blessed mood,

In which the affections gently lead us on,—

Until, the breath of this corporeal frame

And even the motion of our human blood

Almost suspended, we are laid asleep

In body, and become a living soul:

While with an eye made quiet by the power

Of harmony, and the deep power of joy,

We see into the life of things….”

Consciousness and Matter

Many physicists have suggested that the most unified level of physical reality is in fact consciousness itself, in its pure, universal, or unified state.

Many spiritual practices have measurable and repeatable effects particularly including meditations, which can have a normalising impact on a very broad range of physiological functions such as blood pressure, improved immune function, and reduced incidence of disease. In addition, there are measurable psychological effects.

I examine and reference a great many of these in my book Your DNA Diet. I was able to locate over 250 published studies of meditation which support positive effects on 45 key measures of ‘Quality of Life’ identified by health economists in the fields of physiology, psychology, and behaviour.

The psychological effects include reduced anxiety and stress, increased intelligence, field independence, optimisation of the brain, capacity for moral reasoning, improved concentration, emotional stability, improved memory, and reduced anger and depression.

My point here is that not just health, but also a balanced state of mind depends on a very balanced state of the WHOLE physiology. Damage or limit the inherent balanced, reflective, and flexible functioning of the physiology and the immune system, as mRNA vaccines apparently do, and potentially you are damaging your capacity to think clearly.

How Does the Ground State of Our Consciousness Guide Life?

The immune system has access to stored memories of past illness and pathogens, and a library of successful strategies. Many immune memories are inherited. But the invasion of novel pathogens and toxins (a process that modern living has accelerated) launches a systematic search for a fix.

The immune system has set patterns, but in its search for a cure, it also draws upon a highly creative process that must of necessity interface with all the time and distance scales of natural law including the least excited quantum level of life—a virtual superposition of all possible states.

Most successful immune responses are uniquely paired with the pathogen or toxin they are seeking to eliminate. Some, if not most, immune responses involve learning to live with the pathogen whilst simultaneously keeping it in check.

Thus the connection with the abstract quantum level of life, which is also the underlying universal field of consciousness, could be considered to be an essential element of the development of immune responses.

The parallels with our own experiences of consciousness should be apparent. We have characteristic patterns of speech, thought, and fundamental desires. Every so often we need to change gear to meet novel challenges and situations. We are hard wired via our physiology into the most settled state of consciousness—a creative field of all possibilities.

Our intellect, our memories, and our emotions are enriched through this connection which is a driving force of evolution for individuals and through them society at large.

The ground state of our existence is sometimes described as a rock, an anchor through the twists and turns of life. It is that quiet centre of life that we all sense as our substance, our Self.

Our intimate connection with the universal is what protects us and drives us forward. Saints such as Francis of Assisi are recorded as experiencing universal compassion for mankind and nature.

Our connection with and access to the universal level of consciousness depends on the orderly functioning of our whole physiology.

In What Sense Has the Pandemic Changed Our Psychology?

There is one characteristic of the psychology of those administering the pandemic, or one pointedly following the official advice, that is very obvious to the independent observer—reduced capacity to change direction, to change gear, to take account of situations outside the scope of previous usage.

Many commentators have discussed this. Some suggest that it may be the result of a deliberate plan to reset the world economy, others a result of mass formation—a sort of collective mind imposed by saturation propaganda.

There are reasons to support each of these ideas but also reasons to doubt they form the whole story. One problematic aspect of the psychological characteristics of the pandemic is their sudden onset. One week our Prime Minister was telling us she would never force anyone to vaccinate. Within days she enforced coercive vaccination mandates.

Clearly, whole populations are not all co-conspirators seeking to reset the global economy, nor do they appear to have a personal interest in doing so, yet they are mostly compliant.

Our suggestion is that this could be due at least in part to the effect of genetic vaccines which limit the normal flexible pathways of the immune system. This may loosen our connection with our inner Selfand lead us to rely instead on more inflexible conceptions and behaviours.

Are There Other Parallel Examples of Cognitive Impairment?

From a conventional physiological perspective, what could be going on? One possible model can be sought in Parkinson’s disease which is known to cause cognitive impairment in its later stages.

One cause is a drop in the level of dopamine, the neurotransmitter that is involved in regulating the body’s movements. Scientists investigating Parkinsons are looking at changes in two other chemical messengers — acetylcholine and norepinephrine — as possible additional causes of memory and executive function loss.

Areas most often affected include:

  • Difficulty with complex tasks that require a person with Parkinsons to maintain or shift their attention
  • Difficulties in generating, maintaining, shifting and blending different ideas and concepts.

The analogy with Parkinsons is only partially helpful. The cognitive impairment involved takes years to develop, whereas the reported cognitive effects of mRNA vaccination such as brain fog and inflexibility can appear immediately.

mRNA vaccination potentially interferes with the genetic command and control system that controls neurotransmitters. This could explain why specific neural pathways could be directly switched off and instantly affected by Covid vaccination.

The effect of mRNA vaccination on these pathways has not yet been the subject of any research. Thus we don’t know how long such effects, if they exist, will last or how many people they affect. Nor do we know how to reverse any psychological impairment.

Where Will This End?

This discussion has been speculative, pushing the boundaries of what we know and suspect.

It seems clear that trials of mRNA vaccines should have included assessments of cognitive effects and alterations in neural pathways, but then again, if established protocols had been followed, mRNA vaccine trials should have been abandoned when the first deaths subsequent to vaccination were recorded.

This didn’t happen. That in itself is a red flag indicating cognitive impairment.

We are in the middle of a global economic crisis during which corporations are making massive profits, at the expense of affordability.

Thereby they are pushing populations into poverty which will ultimately damage their own corporate affairs.

Health administrators cannot take rational account of real world health data if it contradicts their set ideas, even if it points to mass ill health.

Civilisations which lose their capacity to act rationally, inevitably fail. This is the challenge that the pandemic has thrown up—how do we correct the mistakes that are being made? We will have to dig deep to achieve that.

It is probable that the pathway out of the pandemic, aside from the cessation of risky biotechnology experimentation, should actually involve a process of rediscovering traditions of cultural knowledge and approaches to health which, in the headlong rush of modern living, we have carelessly forgotten or cast aside.

Thankfully this week the German Hospital Federation called for a cessation in the compulsory Covid vaccination programme for health staff because data shows it is endangering health.

New Zealanders received a text message offering them $100, a sausage sizzle, and a Mister Whippy ice cream if they came in for another shot. This is the kind of cognitive dissonance we are still facing.

When is Compelling Evidence Just Propaganda?

0

The BBC has announced compelling evidence that Covid originated in the Wuhan seafood and wildlife market.

Among scientists, this announcement is causing some laughter.

There has been a great deal of prior scientific debate on this subject which has left us in limbo. Principally because the Chinese blocked the possibility of independent investigation and access to data.

Certainly, China, and incidentally, the US National Institute of Health (NIH), have a high interest in repressing any conclusion that Covid originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Infectious Diseases (WIV) which is adjacent to the Wuhan wet market.

After all, WIV was definitely doing recombinant DNA gain of function research on coronaviruses jointly funded by NIH and the Chinese government. If you want it spelled out with two barrells go here.

The BBC article regaled us with a chart of supposed early cases of Covid clustered around the wet market. The first problem with the BBC picture is that the locations of WIV were not shown. They are adjacent and close to the wet market, as Igor Chudov has illustrated (we have added them in RED).

Secondly the actual number, location, and date of early cases is a matter of considerable dispute. The WHO data used in the paper quoted by the BBC was supplied by Chinese authorities and has not been independently verifiable. Weibo data also quoted in the paper is from a later date.

But even if we accept the highly unlikely proposition that the official Chinese data is complete, accurate, and untainted by the authorities, the third problem is that the blue dots (the majority) are cases that have no known connection to the wet market.

Until now, location and origin ambiguity has been a telling argument to question any conclusion that Covid-19 came from the wet market (not to speak of the fact that no species carrying a coronavirus with a genetic makeup sufficiently similar to Covid-19 has been found in Wuhan or nearby or far away for that matter.)

The BBC announced that this problem had been solved by a second paper which suggests that the virus jumped from some unknown animal via an intermediate host (possibly Racoons, quaint furry creatures who sometimes catch a cold) in the SE corner of the market to humans not once but twice at two different times involving two different variants of Covid.

Although animals harbour a great many viruses which could potentially spill over into human populations, the crossover of new types such as Marburg disease or Ebola is a comparatively rare event and in most cases the host animal is identified relatively quickly. This is not the case with Covid-19.

Therefore the suggestion that two distinct variants spilled over in roughly the same place within a short time span from an unidentified animal could be classified as an “ad hoc” suggestion designed to patch up a failing theory.

There are other explanations for the possible early appearance of two phylogenetically related variants of Covid-19 discussed in the second paper referenced by the BBC.

For example some credible accounts have pointed to a laboratory escape (or deliberate release) earlier than November 2019 leaving sufficient time for the highly unstable Covid-19 to mutate.

We are in a period of what has been termed revolutionary science by Thomas Kuhn in his famous book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.

During periods of uncertainty, scientists from opposing camps fight it out in the journals based on experiments and competing theoretical models.

For example the concept of the ether, an invisible substance which pervaded space, was eventually rejected as a result of Einstein’s theory of relativity and its experimental confirmation, but not before reams of ingenious counter arguments were published by scientists anxious to retain the ether concept.

Much the same occurred to defend the notion that space was made of crystal, until Gallielo saw through his telescope the moons of Jupiter travelling freely through the supposedly solid crystalline structure of space.

It is quite legitimate for the authors of the two papers cited by the BBC to publish their observations and speculations about Covid-19 origins. That is a normal process in science. When facts and conclusions are in dispute there is usually a flurry of publishing presenting arguments and counter arguments.

But why did the BBC and their science correspondent Victoria Gill choose to present them to the public as compelling evidence which should end the debate, but omit to depict the location of WIV or discuss the counter arguments?

It is an interesting mystery, but one I think, dear readers, you might be able to solve quite readily. I leave it to you.

Incomprehensible Pronouncements in the Course of a Scientific Revolution

Which brings me to another case of incomprehensible pronouncements in the course of a scientific revolution. Our Director General of Health, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, is retiring from the field of battle.

Dr. Bloomfield has been an unremitting proponent of mRNA vaccination and a person who has gone further even than Pfizer in establishing strict criteria to deny exemptions.

Dr. Bloomfield’s final message to New Zealand was a bombshell:

To better track the risk factors of dying from covid-19 weve done some preliminary analysis….It shows convincingly, here in Aotearoa, that getting boosted is one of the most important things you can do to reduce your risk of death from Covid-19. Very consistent with the international evidence. Across the population, people not fully vaccinated against Covid-19, that is; theyve had less than 2 doses, are 6 times more likely to die if they catch covid-19, compared with someone who has had at least one booster dose. Thats once you adjust for all other factors [my emphasis]. Now, for people under sixty, this risk [of dying if you catch covid-19] is even higher; more than 13 times greater for those who are unvaccinated or less than two doses.”

The key phrase here is ‘once you adjust for all the other factors’.

Dr. Bloomfield didn’t let on what this adjustment involved.

The Boosted Currently Have the Highest Rate of Death

We have been tracking the official daily Covid death toll for months, and it is absolutely clear that the boosted currently have the highest rate of death per 100,000 within 28 days of testing positive for Covid.

This is contrary to what Dr. Bloomfield asserted and much higher than the unvaccinated and the double jabbed. Yet he managed to spin the officially higher mortality among the boosted into a giant health advantage for them by a factor of 6 compared to the unvaccinated population, and 13 (???) for the under 60s. This is not credible and cannot be reasonably asserted without explanation.

We note that the Ministry of Health has exempted its employees under 30 years of age from receiving boosters because of the high rate of adverse reactions in this age group. So what is going on here? Are boosters safe?

The Ministry of Health has decided somehow, without telling us how, that a great many boosted people are not dying ‘because of Covid’, but merely ‘with Covid’.

Hence they have been excluded from the statistics of Covid deaths. You and I can’t really dispute this, because Dr. Bloomfield didn’t give any details of how his gerrymandering Ministry of Health backroom boys have done this.

I did just receive a response to a similar question asked of the Minister of Health Andrew Little a few weeks ago—the minister has noted my concerns and forwarded my correspondence to the Ministry of Health. So he also didn’t say what the boosted are dying of.

New Zealand Has the Highest Rate of Excess All Cause Mortality in the World

One World Data reported last week New Zealand has the highest rate of excess all cause mortality in the world, but the Minister either doesn’t know or doesn’t want anyone to know why.

And just in case we might find out, Dr. Bloomfield has conveniently doctored the data.

Fortunately for us sleuths, the already announced official historical count of deaths cannot be easily altered—the boosted have a higher rate of death than the double jabbed and the unvaccinated. So what are they dying of?

Might I suggest Dr. Watson (sorry, Bloomfield) that the only thing that distinguishes the boosted group from any other group by definition is that they have received more mRNA jabs.

It isn’t a very big step to the conclusion that the boosted must be dying at a greater rate, not because of Covid, but because they are vaccinated.

Boosters are not safe, they are killing us.

As Dr. Bloomfield has resigned from his job and leaves us today for an unknown destination, we may never be able to ask him how he adjusts the data.

We may never be able to ask him why he refused to grant mRNA vaccine exemptions to people injured by the first shot.

We may never be able to ask him why he thinks overseas Covid-19 data points ‘convincingly’ to the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccination, but we do know there are very few if any, credible independent researchers left who agree with him.

Through countless Covid-19 press conferences, Dr. Bloomfield has been rolled out as one source of truth for the NZ public, fully endorsed by Jacinda Ardern. He has left us with a message that will seriously harm many more people unless its is corrected.

Dr. Bloomfield has sought yet again to inflame the public against the run of facts and against the unvaccinated. Just step out from under his shadow and peruse the pages of a published scientific article such as this one.

If you do, you might feel the need to treat Dr. Bloomfield’s recurring advice to get boosted again and again with a great deal of caution. Naked authority by itself does not amount to truth.

Ardern and Her Government Tighten Their Hold on Information Access in New Zealand

0

… and give us a glimpse into their enforcement methods.

Last week the government called for mask wearing to be enforced in New Zealand schools. Many schools have apparently decided to punish students who do not wear masks.

Asked whether she was happy that schools punished students who did not wear masks, Ardern ducked the question, denied the mandate, passed the buck, and still managed to appear happy for students to be punished. Ardern said:

“We are really open minded on this issue [???]. We in fact went back multiple times to education and health and said that ‘look if you believe we should bring that mask mandate back we are happy to do that. Whatever you think is going to be in the best interest of our learners, our schools, and our health outcomes’. They came back to us and said we should strongly encourage their use but we should still allow schools to implement the policies themselves. That’s where we have landed….We have not said mask wearing is compulsory, but we are strongly encouraging it.”

Watch the full interview here. There is plenty of spin but not a lot of ambiguity. Principals have been given a green light to dust off the detention book.

Some schools are giving students detention either during lunchtime or after school (the modern equivalent of writing out “I will wear my mask” a thousand times) which translates into loss of opportunities to participate in extracurricular activities and sports.

This should be unacceptable and is certainly deleterious to a student at any age and may result in them becoming alienated or adversely affected emotionally or socially.

Students go to school to learn and understand the process of verifying knowledge, to engage socially, and to further develop skills in communication; whereby they may debate and agree or disagree with one another, without the fear of being punished or discriminated against.

There is a considerable body of scientific evidence pointing to the ineffectiveness of masks to stop transmission. Longterm mask use also poses health risks and causes significant learning deficits.

Some parents, and hence their children, will be well aware of this.

A policy of punishment for non mask wearers, is the antithesis of a constructive learning environment and teaches, ‘comply without question or face a penalty.’

School attendance in New Zealand is already at an all time low. As a result of this, it is only going to fall further. The opportunities for constructive debate are fast disappearing in education and we can understand why many parents are turning their thoughts to homeschooling and homeschooling communities.

The problem here in New Zealand is that the general public is being deliberately kept in the dark about the ineffectiveness of masks and the dangers of prolonged mask wearing.

Most are following government advice thinking that they are protecting themselves and others from Covid. They are ending the day with a headache and a sore face, but sure that they have thereby saved the world.

A Glimpse Into Their Enforcement Methods

So far, the government has kept a tight hold on the Covid narrative by warning people that alternative news sources and social media conversations are full of misinformation, whilst government announcements are closely following ‘the science’. 

They also give cash grants to MSM and advertise to the point of saturation.

That is all set to ramp up from today. The government has concluded a formal binding agreement with Meta (FB and Instagram), TikTok, Google (Gmail and YouTube), Amazon (Spark) and Twitter to limit the availability of harmful content including misinformation and disinformation in New Zealand.

In a world first, the code is described as ‘voluntary’, but it also includes a ‘commitment’ to being held ‘accountable’ which allows its provisions to be ‘enforced’.

How is that for doublespeak? And who is deciding what is harmful?

The mask mandate rules and the information censorship have something in common. The government is asking others to do their dirty work and then asking us to believe it has nothing to do with them. We are not naive, we already know how this works.

The agreement cleverly conflates things that we all feel should be controled such as child sexual exploitation and incitement to violence with rational discussions about drug safety and effectiveness.

YouTube has previously withdrawn Covid content from view at the private request of the Ministry of Health. Apparently, this can happen if any content causes the New Zealand government embarrassment.

I don’t suppose it has escaped your notice that internet censorship is a tool of oppressive governments. The dangers are becoming all too obvious in New Zealand, where the majority of the general public, who are subjected to saturation government advertising, still believe that regular mRNA boosters and flu shots offer protection for life that is stronger than natural immunity.

This is all taking on a macabre aspect as official Covid data here and in the EU is showing that boosted individuals are increasingly more likely to die with Covid than the unvaccinated are.

The apparent reluctance on the part of the government to engage with the implications of this official Covid data is seriously worrying. Governments traditionally have a general duty of care when it comes to policing public health measures.

This year has been one of the wettest on record. As a result, ants are coming into homes in record numbers, and you may have been struck with how expendable ant populations are.

Ant colonies appear to have a centralised administrative policy whereby any number of workers can be put at risk in the search for homes and food for queens.

A sort of ‘group think’ which starkly contrasts with human ethics wherein the individual is highly valued.

Here in New Zealand, we are 90% mRNA vaccinated and we currently have the highest rate of all cause mortality in the world. Even the Ministry of Health has admitted this is not because of Covid.

Yet if you follow the government advertising and press statements you will probably be unaware of this and happily sure that ‘the science’ is being followed.

I don’t need to draw conclusions for you here. If you are following the current Covid science journal publishing you will be well aware of mathematical arguments entirely based on collected data which are taking place within a rational framework. Ignoring or hiding these is dangerous.

Co-authored: Guy Hatchard Ph.D. and Narayani Hatchard

The NZ Government Wrests Control of Our Children’s Vaccination Status With the Help of Family Court Judges

0

Stuff newspaper under its banner programme ‘The Whole Truth’, which is financially supported by the government, trumpeted its satisfaction yesterday with the headline: “Covid-19: Family Court declines mum’s bid to stop her daughter being vaccinated”

In the latest of six Family Court decisions promoting Covid-19 vaccination for minors, another judge, Sarah Jane Fleming, has followed suit by ruling that a 12 year old girl should receive Covid mRNA vaccination against the wishes of her mother. The judge supported the wish of the father to allow vaccination.

The judge decided to overrule the concerns of the mother regarding adverse effects of mRNA vaccination on younger persons (a matter of published medical evidence) saying: “There was no evidence the girl would be at serious risk of side effects or an adverse reaction” (watch this video to view evidence).

The judge further ignored medical advice that Covid poses little risk to children by speculating: “Of course, the longer-term effects of a child at this age contracting the virus are also largely unknown.” 

Critically, neither are the longer term effects of the experimental biotech vaccine, although research is now pointing to sustained immune deficiency following mRNA vaccination.

The judge noted that the girl wanted to be vaccinated as “she wanted to participate in competitions and go to the movies” and described her as a “mature and thoughtful child” who had decided that vaccination was “the right thing to do.”

The girl had had a string of arguments with her mother, who, according to the court hearing, was seeking to ‘manipulate’ her daughter. The Stuff article referred to the mother as ‘the woman.’

Is this just a case of the family courts settling a dispute between estranged parents or is there a deeper principle at issue?

Who is actually stopping the young girl from going to the movies and participating in school competitions? It is not the mother; this is the direct result of New Zealand government mandates and instructions to school principals. It is the government who is manipulating.

In fact the girl is not taking a ‘mature and thoughtful’ decision as required by the Child Care Act, she is reacting to draconian government mandates. Her response is understandable. What young person wouldn’t want to undertake ordinary activities with her peers?

In this case, the child proved unable to fully rationalise the situation objectively and instead blamed her mother. Anyone who has taught 12 year olds, will tell you that failure to weigh up causal factors is typical of this age group. The judge did not acknowledge this, but instead blamed the mother.

Thus the Family Court sided with the government by overruling the necessity for parents and guardians to make informed joint decisions about their children’s health. This is symptomatic of a growing arrogance on the part of the government and its courts.

There seems to be little comprehension of how much the stability of the wider society depends on the integrity of the family unit. This dangerous trend, which places children at risk, has accelerated during the pandemic.

Government policy in New Zealand allows 12+ year olds to consent to be vaccinated at school without the permission or presence of either parent. This is a case of the government suggesting to children that they can overrule their parents in matters of health. Thus weakening the bond between parent and child that is a, if not the, crucial element of child development and safety.

Covid vaccination is not a lone government intervention. Vaping has taken off among young people based on government recommendations that it is a safe alternative to smoking. It is increasingly clear that vaping is affecting health. According to a survey of 19,000 NZ school children in November 2021, more than a quarter now vape regularly.

Last week the government advised school principals to enforce mask wearing for students despite copious evidence that mask wearing is ineffective at stopping transmission, impairs physical and mental development, and harms the health of the young. Some teachers report that the damage is irreparable.

During 1991, I managed an earthquake relief project in the Soviet Union. I experienced first hand the effect of government childhood intervention. Students were assigned to career paths from an early age. Most ended up as square pegs in round holes, bored with their assigned daytime career whilst moonlighting during the evenings doing something more suitable.

We should be aware of the extremes of what can happen when children are encouraged by the state to overrule their parents’ ideas. This happened during the 1930s in Germany when children were directly pressured to enrol in Nazi youth movements. It fostered a moral vaccuum which eventually helped to normalise the cruelties of the holocaust.

The underlying assumption of our government that they know ‘what is best for children’ is not supported by prior experience. A 2022 investigation found that the government child care agency, Oranga Tamariki, recorded 486 incidences of harm to children under its care during the preceding 12 months. 1 out of every 12 children in care. A scandal that has rocked the nation. These vulnerable children should have been safe, they were not.

When placed in positions of authority over children, the state takes an impersonal approach which mandates the same for everyone in education and health, whereas parents try hard to satisfy the individual needs of their family members.

Our government appears to be determined to undermine the necessary family responsibilities and structures which underpin development and maintenance of stable and adaptive social relationships throughout society. Parental guidance and choice are essential elements of a successful and thriving diverse society.

We are eagerly awaiting the first High Court ruling on vaccine mandates for children and hope the judge diverges from the Family Court rulings to date.

The Consequences of Putting Medical Professionals in Charge of Pandemic Policy

Putting Medical Professionals in Charge of Pandemic Policy Has Been a Prescription for Both a Health Disaster and an Economic Catastrophe.

This week the public narrative changed dramatically. What are the lessons for our future?

The cat is out of the bag. MSM, governments, and health authorities have begun to acknowledge that Covid vaccines don’t work and cause serious health problems.

Worse still, pandemic policy is set to injure many more.

Even CDC director Rochelle Walensky has reportedly admitted ‘hope’ (yes hope) played an important role in their assessment of vaccine efficacy and, thereby, policy formation.

The German government warns that 1 in 5000 suffer serious side effects (just remember this is likely to be a gross underestimate which, in any case, omits long term effects).

The Israeli government has been caught hiding the extent of vaccine injury among children.

The Guardian newspaper, a bastion of vaccine orthodoxy, has conceded that prior infection not Covid vaccination offers the best protection against infection.

If you haven’t already seen it, watch Tucker Carlson on Fox News query the official US narrative, (and he references published science).

Fortunately for us, no one is going to be able to suppress this trend towards honesty, however hard they try, because it is increasingly difficult to ignore, hide, or spin Covid data from around the world.

The Austrian government, under pressure to explain what went wrong with their Covid policy, has apparently decided to blame doctors.

Are doctors at fault? Certainly the pandemic has taught us just how dangerous it is to hand control of public policy to medical professionals who receive a highly specialised but very narrow training.

Medical Professionals Have No Idea How Economic Systems Work.

paper in SSRN journal concludes:

“It has become increasingly clear that an important negative side-effect of the most aggressive [pandemic] response strategies may involve a steep increase in poverty, hunger, and inequalities”

The New York Post summarises a range of data:

“The data shows lockdowns end more lives than they save”

CNN has offered:

“The pandemic has pushed nearly 100 million people into poverty. They’re struggling to escape”

The United Nations concludes:

“COVID-related hunger could kill more people than the virus…as the health crisis becomes an economic one, funding shortfalls and supply chain issues could see millions more die of hunger.”

The New Zealand government has spent more than $70 billion dollars on its pandemic response, more than half of an entire year’s revenue. This is borrowed money which will have to be repaid by our children. Most of this expenditure has been directed towards economically unproductive activity.

Economic systems involve networks composed of individual workers, creatives, growers, investors, assets, producers, distributors, retailers, and consumers spread across a very wide range of sectors.

Like climatic systems, economic systems are very complex and they are sensitive to marginal changes in their component parts which can drive unexpected outcomes.

From a limited and myopic medical perspective, sacking a highly qualified professional because they are unvaccinated may appear to make sense, but the economic consequences of even small losses in the nation’s skill base can be devastating.

Witness the near collapse of the New Zealand medical system. We lost a few thousand medical professionals to vaccine mandates. Has this played a part? Undoubtedly.

Was it necessary or helpful? No. We now know that unvaccinated individuals create a strong pool of natural immunity after initial infection which would have been a huge asset in our health system.

Medical Interference in Economic Policy Has Been a Disaster

Repeat mandates across the whole economic spectrum, toss in lockdowns and stay at home orders, and you have a prescription for economic chaos.

Discover that vaccines don’t actually work and even lower the immunity of the workforce, and you have entered a generational economic downturn.

Find that vaccines reduce the birth rate and increase all-cause mortality among working age people, and you have cancelled the stability of the world’s economic system altogether. That includes the world’s food supply system that is already under threat from climate change.

There are far more frightening potential consequences of the pandemic that are starting to come under scientific scrutiny. Immune deficiency resulting from Covid vaccination could well drive big surges in cancer incidence, the jury is still out.

Neurological and psychological deficits caused by invasive mRNA gene techniques remain unexplored. We are enrolled in a foolhardy gamble and the medical profession has mandated us to accept poor odds.

Of course, doctors and pharmaceutical systems are fighting back. The narrow economic imperatives of their sector—profits, high salaries, grants, drug and vaccine sales and incentives, all of which are associated with pandemic-focused government policy—are too tempting to give up, but given up they must be if we are to regain some prospect of economic stability.

The Medical System has Expanded Beyond the Limits of Safe Practice

This is not an exclusive product of the pandemic; it has a long history.

The WHO, medical and drug regulation, doctor training and practice, government support, medical orthodoxy and ‘ethics’ form a closely intertwined economic system that has over the years drifted away from any liability for mistakes and adverse outcomes.

This has been an assumption of power over life and death without consequences. The policing of the system has failed us. Medical misadventure became the third leading cause of death even before the pandemic.

Despite this, government policy is currently at the behest of medical czars. Covid was likely created by medical researchers, the dangerous and ultimately useless Covid vaccines certainly were.

Their combined effects are driving a steep downturn in longevity and with it economic productivity. Sadly the medical profession seems content to turn a blind eye to these outcomes in a show of contempt for human life and their hippocratic oath.

The standing of the medical profession has been eroded by their own disregard for science and ethics. The pandemic has been very much their own collective creation.

First among the subsequent mistakes has been a determination to use the pandemic as an opportunity to enforce their epidemiological orthodoxy on everyone irrespective of the introduction of risky novel biotechnology and irrespective of what the public data has been progressively revealing.

The belief that the sprawling self-interested medical system could or should dictate government policy to the exclusion of dissenting voices was a fatal mistake. We are now reaping the inevitable and devastating economic, social, and health outcomes. These are set to carry on for years.

Reform of medical systems and a reduction in their power is necessary.

  • This must include the restoration of free medical choice, caution, and accountability.
  • It must include a pause in risky biotech experiments.
  • It must include a reassessment of the scientific criteria of medical efficacy.
  • This must take account of quality of life outcomes and more stringent safety considerations.

The longer remedial action is postponed, the more social and economic pain will result.

Pandemic Policy is Not Based on Science, So What Is It Based on?

For the last year, the Hatchard Report has been publishing discussions carefully referenced to published scientific papers. These reveal an evolving picture.

Unfortunately, government policy has remained fairly static over the course of the year and has consequently become detached from the scientific record.

The questions everyone is asking: “How could this have happened?” and, more importantly, “Why is it still happening?” and finally, “Will I survive this madness?”.

It is Important Not to Lose Contact with Commonsense

New Zealand has simultaneously the world’s highest rate of both vaccination and Covid. Record levels of all cause mortality. Unprecedented rates of vaccination adverse effects. A failing hospital system overwhelmed with a great variety of health conditions, much of which is unrelated to Covid.

Draw your own conclusions, it is not very difficult is it?

It is all too obvious that something has gone terribly wrong with our pandemic policy but the government is obstinately clinging to its course. Today enforcing compulsory mask wearing in schools. Tomorrow, who knows what they will do?

Scientists around the world are becoming noticeably more cautious about endorsing mRNA vaccines; some are openly changing sides.

The German government has officially admitted a high rate of serious adverse effects following mRNA vaccination and encouraged its citizens to seek help.

Despite this, anyone publicly stating the obvious is still being cancelled by social media giants (YouTube, Google, FB, Twitter), MSM, and the pharmaceutical PR machine. Even sharing scientific papers might get your account deleted.

It all has a disturbing ring of unreality doesn’t it? It either makes you laugh or cry.

Don’t worry, the tide is turning, a sense of desperation is creeping into the pro-mRNA narrative.

These are some common tropes that we fact check:

This is only a preprint paper, therefore it is not peer reviewed, so its conclusions must be suspect.

FALSE: Actually almost all Covid publishing is preprint. There are very good reasons for this, Covid mutates so quickly that papers would be out of date if they had to go through the lengthy peer review process before seeing the light of day. In any case, preprint papers are strictly vetted by journals.

It was a study done on mice, so it doesn’t apply to humans.

FALSE: Lots of studies are done on animals as a precursor to assessing the risks for humans. It is standard procedure.

mRNA vaccine does work because it is actually a therapeutic vaccine designed to alleviate symptoms.

FALSE: The term ‘therapeutic vaccine’ was first used in 2010 and is limited to certain experimental pharmaceuticals designed to aid treatment programmes for diseases such as HIV. They are administered after infection. mRNA vaccines are administered before infection.

My eye drops say they could cause irritation to one in every thousand and I use them every day without harm, so even if the vaccine has side effects it is actually very safe.

FALSE: People aren’t dying after using eye drops, as they are after mRNA vaccination.

mRNA vaccination prevents long covid

FALSE: studies show vaccination reduces incidence of long covid by only 14%, which is negligible especially when weighed against the high risk of adverse effects.

Our hospitals are overwhelmed by unvaccinated Covid patients. I am so glad that I am fully vaccinated otherwise my Covid symptoms would have been worse.

FALSE: the rate of hospitalisation per 100,000 boosted individuals exceeds that of the unvaccinated.

mRNA vaccines cannot affect the DNA in your liver because the studies were done in vitro and don’t apply to real life

FALSE: In vitro studies are routinely taken as key indicators of potential human effects.

You’ll have a hard time proving that vaccines cause harm. Temporal association doesn’t amount to causality

FALSE: Temporal association has traditionally been considered the primary indicator of causality.

Herd immunity is a conspiracy theory

FALSE: It is a highly verified epidemiological concept. Unvaccinated people are 97% protected from reinfection after their first Covid inflection, but the vaccinated remain vulnerable due to mRNA vaccine induced immune deficiency.

Masks prevent transmission and infection

FALSE: New Zealand is masked up. Go figure.

Unvaccinated people are reservoirs of infection, they are passing on Covid to others even if they have no symptoms

FALSE: We are getting very silly now, but some New Zealand GPs are circulating this mush.

It is a curious feature of pandemic times that some scientists and medicos want us to transfer our allegiance from our time-honoured cultural, educational, sacred, and scientific traditions, to their own inventions and imaginings.

They want to deny the existence of cultural diversity, scientific inquiry, natural remediation, and ethical morality in favour of their own dictated absolutes. Now their view of health is falling apart.

We Are in What Physicists Might Call a ‘phase Transition’

As the reality of poor and dangerous outcomes of pandemic policy begins to sink home, a period of confusion, disbelief, and desperation is becoming more general.

The potential profits and income from pandemic products and services is beginning to look far less desirable even to its beneficiaries who are looking over their shoulders as Covid catches up with them.

It is a time to stand firm, to hold on to the Self, to remember traditions and historical lessons. A time to understand science as a process of verification rather than a dogma. A time to rekindle our understanding of the sanctity of life.

In the end truth alone triumphs.

Face Off on Face Masks

Professors Michael Baker and Siouxsie Wiles are currently going all in on mask wearing.

Baker has likened the unmasked to “murderers” and “drunk drivers” (???).

Prime Minister Ardern is being widely rebuked for a photo op at the Beehive of a very large unmasked group. Her excuse:

“the photographer
made me do it”.

A Japanese report published by Nature on July 18 2022 entitled Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic should raise eyebrows and lower face masks further.

A picture is worth a thousand words, so try Figure 5. These are the organisms found growing on face masks:

Note the pathogenicity column. These are dangerous for humans. The authors say:

Since masks can be a direct source of infection to the respiratory tract, digestive tract, and skin, it is crucial to maintain their hygiene to prevent bacterial and fungal infections that can exacerbate COVID-19.”

The study found:

We observed bacterial colonies in 99% of the samples on the face-side and 94% on the outer-side….We found no significant differences in the colony counts among the different mask types [non-woven, polyurethane, and gauze or cloth], regardless of the duration of usage.”

Forget ordinary washing, nothing short of prolonged boiling can get rid of these pathogens. Even frequent mask changes are ineffective, pathogens rapidly reappear, as fabric surfaces provide ideal homes for their colonies.

The authors concluded:

We propose that immunocompromised people should avoid repeated use of masks to prevent microbial infection.”

Reports indicate that our hospitals are swamped with cases of respiratory illness. Is prolonged mask use exacerbating the situation? Very probably.

mRNA vaccination has been associated with immune deficiency….

Evidence for mask use is at best weak and contradictory. To assess the counter arguments read this. The Japanese report is one more nail in the coffin. The damaging effects on children’s development is also well known.

But if you listened to Michael Baker’s multiple mainstream media interviews (see this for example) over the last week you wouldn’t be aware that there is any doubt on the subject of mask wearing.

He is going full tilt at Ardern to mandate them for school children, no exemptions, and he is getting plenty of sympathetic coverage in MSM. Is she going to give in? You never know.

As we reported yesterday, there are some sad truths here. Many of our experts are falling behind when it comes to reading the latest studies, or if they do read them, dogma ensures they only see what they want to see.

Government funding distorts actions and advice further. Who in New Zealand is going to willingly give up generous government grants and payments in order to tell it how it is?

At this point, New Zealand appears to be facing a science crisis. Some experts might benefit from a break to restudy, recharge, and reassess what works and what doesn’t according to the published science record.

How the Nz Government Misleads Us Through Payments to Msm and Others

0

Spot the difference between a government funded mainstream newspaper summarising a Covid journal paper and an independent physician/medical educator.

On July 14th Stuff newspaper Keith Lynch Explainer Editor and Kate Newton Senior Data Journalist authored an article Covid-19 NZ: Why the rising tide of cases doesn’t tell the whole story. This was a long article attempting to analyse the current Covid wave in New Zealand.

The article references a preprint study from Qatar entitled: “Protection of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection against reinfection with the Omicron BA.4 or BA.5 subvariants” which analyses Covid outcomes depending on the subject’s prior vaccination and infection history.

mRNA Vaccination Ultimately Increases Vulnerability to Covid

The real substance of the referenced large Qatar study was very interesting but simply not reported by Stuff.

The study found that over the space of just three months, protection against Covid infection from either two mRNA doses or boosters becomes negligible (below 10% effectiveness) and then heads off into negative territory.

In other words, the study implies if you persist in continuing with boosters, you become progressively more vulnerable to Covid infection than before you had any vaccination.

And it’s a double whammy; from other studies, we additionally know that vulnerability to adverse effects such as heart disease increases with each vaccination.

This underlines the now well established science that mRNA Covid vaccination damages your immune system.

When Missing Information Becomes Misinformation

Back in March, Kate Newton wrote “Covid-19: The charts that show why a booster is so important”. At the time, Kate’s article featured Covid hospitalisation charts showing boosters looking incredibly effective and the unvaccinated very vulnerable.

Curiously, in the latest article, Stuff appears to have moved on from discussions promoting boosters.

So why no mention of Covid hospitalisation statistics versus vaccination status?

Presumably, Kate Newton, as Stuff’s Senior Data Journalist, is still following Covid data, so she will know, as we reported two days ago, that the position has since been reversed.

Boosted individuals are currently looking very vulnerable, while the unvaccinated have acquired a significant degree of immunity, significantly greater than boosted individuals.

Instead of discussing vaccination, the Stuff article concentrates on a single piece of data from the very detailed and extensive Qatar study:

“A pre-Omicron infection, the study suggests, offers very little protection against BA.5, but it notes the “effectiveness of a previous infection against symptomatic BA.4/BA.5 reinfection was 76%”

In other words, the study found that if you are vaccinated and caught BA.1 or BA.2, you are 76% protected from catching BA.4 or BA.5 or conversely 24% likely to catch Omicron again.

If you caught Delta and are vaccinated, you have no additional immune protection from the latest Omicron variants. This is, I think you will agree, a rather underwhelming piece of information.

The Unvaccinated are Vindicated by Qatar Studies

Stuff received money from our government to support their programme to target vaccine ‘misinformation’ under their banner The Whole Truth.

I am not sure that the rapidly decreasing vaccination effectiveness data from Qatar would fit in very well, which was perhaps why it didn’t get a mention.

As we reported two days ago another study from the same authors in Qatar found that the unvaccinated are 97.3% protected from severe Covid reinfection if they have already had a previous infection with any form of Covid (not just BA.1 or BA.2 but also including Alpha and Delta).

If you put the two Qatar studies together, there is an inescapable conclusion which is being carefully hidden from the public by our government.

If you compare the outcomes for the vaccinated and unvaccinated, it is clear that the unvaccinated emerge way better off. They made the right choice.

Savvy Medical Commentators are Deserting a Sinking Ship

If you want to see the Qatar articles discussed and analysed in detail by a respected physician (something I wholeheartedly recommend if you want to move away from misleading summaries in MSM), I suggest you watch Dr. Mobeen Syed‘s latest video on his highly respected medical education channel.

Dr. Mobeen Syed is vaccinated himself and initially supported mRNA Covid vaccination policy.

Being a serious and highly respected scientist and physician pioneering high quality health education, he and his team have continued to follow and report on the Covid data as it has accumulated.

According to Dr Syed, this is showing a lack of effectiveness, increasing reinfections, and a growing catalogue of adverse effects.

Dr. Syed concluded that the US authorities should withdraw support for mRNA Covid vaccination and rethink their policies.

The Stuff article went on to discuss the increasing vulnerability of older age groups to the latest Omicron variants in New Zealand. It also notes that all cause mortality is rising. It concludes:

“This all touches on that somewhat bizarre Covid paradox – avoiding infection (particularly for the most vulnerable) is clearly a good thing but at the same time infection, when combined with vaccination, adds to an immunity pool that protects the population.”

This is both obscure and sort of comforting, but in fact, the Qatar studies do not support Stuff’s conclusion that vaccination protects population immunity.

Together the studies point to a completely contradictory conclusion:

Only prior infection without vaccination is creating long lasting immunity.

According to medical staff, our health service is overwhelmed and in danger of collapse. The government would be quite happy if the public concluded this is all due to Covid.

As we reported ten days ago, admissions because of Covid form a small fraction of the hospital workload. The health crisis is not the result of Covid, but it could well be the result of mRNA vaccination.

It is time for the government and the media to come clean to the New Zealand public—mRNA vaccination is not working. It is progressively causing adverse effects and immune deficiency. The vaccination programme needs to be paused.

This should include an end to:

  • misleading saturation government advertising
  • cash grants to vaccinate to individuals and community groups
  • all vaccine mandates including those affecting medical professionals
  • vaccine promotion and administration fees to GPs
  • grants given to MSM to support government pandemic policy

These costly financial policies are disincentivizing access to reliable scientific assessments and distorting public perceptions about healthy choices.

The government is wasting public funds to avoid political embarrassment. In the process they are recklessly endangering the health of the public and damaging the economy.

Self-spreading Vaccines are Coming for You

0

Self-spreading vaccines are coming for you: Are we entering an age of super medicine or a zombie apocalypse?

Pfizer spends more money on public relations (read ‘paid articles’ and ‘political lobbying’) than it does on research and development, which is one reason why, when you read mainstream media or listen to politicians, you might think that mRNA vaccination has been a great success and should be expanded.

Well, it has been a financial success; Pfizer earns close to $1,000 every second from mRNA vaccine sales—a total of $36 billion in 2021 and currently growing fast.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but shouldn’t we measure the success of medicines by how healthy we become?

Looking around the world, we have reported on rising all-cause mortality and birth rates dropping. The stark conclusion: mRNA vaccines are promising a new age, but not the sort we are going to enjoy.

Hot investment money is pouring into biotech research efforts in the hope of even higher profits from a range of products promised to cure everything from leading killers—cancer and heart disease, to acne.

Just one problem, these products don’t actually exist; efforts to create them are currently being carried on in the upside down world of Stranger Things laboratories.

The processes designed to create these products are in fact rather scary and certainly dangerous, but they are usually safely wrapped up in language that is incomprehensible to the layperson.

Try for example this paper written just before the pandemic describing experimental vaccine design and delivery protocols.

Let me translate just a little: research to design new vaccines involves combining parts of viruses and pathogens together along with some chemical adjuvants with a view to evading the defensive mechanisms of our immune system and then changing how it works.

What could possibly go wrong? Is it inconceivable that they would escape their laboratory home?

Scary answer: they are going to be deliberately released.

You may think that anyone so inclined can continue to refuse vaccines (even if it means they lose their job as a result of mandates) well think again.

Biotechnology research has ranged into exotic territory designed to control your life without you even realising what is going on.

For two decades scientists have been sporadically doing research to create new highly contagious diseases containing vaccines which covertly inoculate whole populations without them even getting near a needle.

Suddenly this research has accelerated in order to bypass the ‘problem’ of vaccine hesitancy. Reportedly around a dozen institutions in the UK, US and Europe are involved.

National Geographic reported on March 19 2022:

“Imagine a cure that’s as contagious as the disease it fights—a vaccine that could replicate in a host’s body and spread to others nearby, quickly and easily protecting a whole population from microbial attacks. That’s the goal of several teams around the world who are reviving controversial research to develop self-spreading vaccines.”

“Researchers are currently developing self-spreading vaccines for Ebola, bovine tuberculosis, and Lassa fever, a viral disease spread by rats that causes upward of 300,000 infections annually in parts of West Africa. The approach could be expanded to target other zoonotic diseases, including rabies, West Nile virus, Lyme disease, and the plague.”

Jonas Sandbrink, a biosecurity researcher at the University of Oxford’s Future of Humanity Institute argues that the viruses used in these vaccines could themselves easily mutate, jump species, or set off a chain reaction with devastating effects across entire ecosystems.

“Once you set something engineered and self-transmissible out into nature, you don’t know what happens to it and where it will go. Even if you just start by setting it out into animal populations, part of the genetic elements might find their way back into humans.”

Just one problem with this cautionary quote: for ‘might’ read ‘will’. The pandemic has taught us that genetic material is more highly mobile and invasive than anyone ever imagined.

The Epoch Times reports that in 2019, the UK government began exploring this self-spreading vaccine technology to address the seasonal flu.

A research paper from its Department of Health and Social Care (yes, Social Care) advised that university students could be an obvious target group:

“They do not work, so [vaccinating them] will not cause much economic disruption and most have second homes to go to, thereby spreading the vaccine.”

Researchers admitted that a contagious vaccine for an attenuated flu virus would cause some deaths but estimated these would be less than the original influenza virus. As the UK government report described:

“Self-spreading vaccines are less lethal but not non-lethal: they can still kill. Some people will die who would otherwise have lived, though fewer people die overall.”

I want you to take careful note of the use of the word ‘estimate’. How many times have estimates described by so-called experts and modellers been wildly wrong during the pandemic? You tell me, I’ve lost count.

This is the hundredth article I have written about the pandemic, but I am almost lost for words here. Biotechnology research has crossed the rubicon. The line supposedly separating bioweapons from vaccines has been blurred if not completely dissolved.

Have you ever watched true crime? If you have, you will be aware that criminologists believe that serial killers are in search of control. The sense of power over their victims is intoxicating to them.

Any scientist who is prepared to not only risk the genetic basis of human civilization, but also ensure that no one can escape their net, shares the twisted outlook of the serial killer combined with the means to affect millions supported by government grants and predatory investors.

Most people sitting at home are very glad they feel secure and remote from the potential cruelties of those who are mentally deranged and violent.

The lesson of today’s press release and the pandemic in general has been that we can no longer feel safe in our own homes.

There are biotech scientists, lost to the danger of their work, who are determined to invade our privacy and our bodies. There is only one exit strategy, call for biotechnology research to be paused.